DOCSLIB.ORG

Evangelical Philosophical Society National Meeting, 2009 New Orleans, LA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evangelical Philosophical Society National Meeting, 2009 New Orleans, LA Evangelical Philosophical Society National Meeting, 2009 New Orleans, LA Wednesday, November 18TH J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II/3rd Floor) Moderator: James Joiner (Calvin Theological Seminary) 9:20 John White The Human Person at the Center of Sport Drama: Cedarville University John Paul II’s Personalistic Norm for Sport 10:10 Jae-Yun Park The Past, the Present, and the Future are Altogether Claremont Graduate in There: The Holistic and Eschatological Concept of University Divine Knowledge 11:00 Todd Bates Calvin’s “Eminent Pagan”: The Classical Roots of California Baptist the Sensus Divinitatus University J.W. Marriott (Ile De France III/3rd Floor) Moderator: William Lane Craig (Talbot School of Theology) 8:30 ------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- 9:20 Paul Copan Cruelty or Authority: The Moral Status of Jesus in the Palm Beach Atlantic Account of the Gadarene Demoniac University 10:10 Jim Spiegel/ An Anti-Naturalist Argument from Beauty Taylor University/ Doug Geivett Talbot School of Theology J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II/3rd Floor) Moderator: Christopher Black (New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary) 2:50 Shawn Graves The Epistemology of Disagreement and Christian Belief Cedarville University 3:40 Rich Holland The Incarnation and Temporal Sequence in Divine Life Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary 4:30 Walter Schultz Theistic Modal Structuralism Northwestern College (MN) 5:20 Patrick Smith The Enduring Challenge of Religious Skepticism: Gordon-Conwell An Evaluation of a Recent Proposal Theological Seminary 1 J.W Marriott (Ile De France III/3rd Floor) Moderator: Kolja Keller (New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary 2:50 Xan Bozzo Professor Morriston on Actual Infinites in the Kalam Stritch & Marquette University Marc Belcastro Cosmological Argument Taylor University 3:40 Roger Sharp Social Ethics for a Social Network: An Confident Christianity Unapologetic Presence on Facebook Apologetics and Discernment Ministry J.W. Marriott (Rosalie/St. Claude/3rd Floor) Moderator: David Beck (Liberty University) 2:50 R. Scott Smith For Lack of Intrinsic Intentionality, and Biola University Its Constructive Implications 3:40 Timothy Paul Am I Latino (Or Just Liminal), and Does It Bethel College (IN) Erdel Matter? Dialoguing with Jorge J.E. Gracia On Latinos, Philosophy, and Social Identity 4:30 Tully Borland Duns Scotus’ View on the Nature of Freedom Ouachita Baptist University 5:20 ---------------- EPS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING ---------------------------------- J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II-III/3rd Floor) 8:30 ----------------- EPS RECEPTION (fellowship and a brief encouragement from J.P. Moreland) Thursday, November 19th J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II/3rd Floor) Moderator: Steve Lemke (New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary) 8:30 Timothy Pickavance A New(ish) Argument against Humeanism Talbot School of Theology 9:20 Timothy Mosteller The Logical Limits of Evolutionary Accounts California Baptist University of Human Nature 10:10 ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------- 11:00 Joel Schwartz Does Wolterstorff Get Rights Right? An Baylor University Examination of the Grounding of Human Rights 2 J.W. Marriott (Ile De France III/3rd Floor) Moderator: Jeremy Evans (Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary) 8:30 ----------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ 9:20 ----------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- 10:10 Gary Habermas Discovering Relief from Our Worst Pain: Liberty University The View from the Cross and Empty Tomb 11:00 William Lane Yet Another Failed Anti-Molinist Argument Talbot School of Theology Craig J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II/3rd Floor) Moderator: Paul Copan (Palm Beach Atlantic University) 3:00 Plenary Session: Presented by: Tim O’Connor Indiana University Title: Explaining Contingent Existence 3:50 Plenary Session Continued 5:00 EPS BUSINESS MEETING Friday, November 20th J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II/3rd Floor) Moderator: Craig Mitchell (Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary) 9:10 Tom Provenzola Relational Causality and Truth Saving Pre-Modernity Liberty University 10:00 John Ferrer Propositional Defeat: The Argument from Southwestern Baptist Non-Cognitivism Critiqued Theological Seminary 10:50 Michael Rea Toward a Hylomorphic Model of the Incarnation University of Notre Dame J.W. Marriott (Ile De France III/3rd Floor) Moderator: Shawn Graves (Cedarville University) 9:10 Michael Morkve Toward an Ethic of ‘Religionless Christianity’: Western Seminary (Oregon) The Concepts Development through Bonhoeffer’s Life and Writings 10:00 Roger Overton Virtues and the Case for Christ: Virtue Apologetics Talbot School of Theology As the Connection between Character Development And Evangelism 10:50 Glenn Siniscalchi Resurrecting Jesus and Critical Historiography: Duquesne University William Lane Craig and Dale Allison in Dialogue 3 J. W. Marriott (St. Jerome/3rd Floor) Moderator: Shaun Grunblatt 9:10 Justin Barnard Moral Complicity and Human Embryonic Stem Union University Cell Use 10:00 Jeffrey Koperski Relativity, Spacetime, and Free Will Saginaw Valley State University 10:50 David Baggett If God Weren’t Good Liberty University J.W. Marriott (Ile De France II/3rd Floor) Moderator: Glenn Siniscalchi (Duquesne University) 1:40 Jim Spiegel Why Gay Marriage is Unjust Taylor University 2:30 Steve Lemke Agent Causation and Moral Accountability New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary 3:20 --------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- 4:10 Robert Larmer Christian Philosophy and Methodological University of New Brunswick Naturalism Corrections to the Evangelical Philosophical Society Program: ***Khaldoun Sweis’ presentation has been moved to the section on Personal and Social Ethics (Sheraton (Rhythms 3/3rd Floor)) from 11:00 to 11:40. ***Michael Rea’s paper has been moved from Thursday at 9:20 AM to Friday at 10:50 AM due to a scheduling conflict. ***Tim Mosteller is unable to attend this year’s event, and so his paper session will be cancelled (Thursday morning, 9:20 AM, Ile De France II/3rd Floor). ***Todd Bates is unable to attend this year’s event, and so his paper session will be cancelled (Wednesday morning, 11 AM, Ile De France II/3rd Floor). ***Jeremy Evans will substitute for Khaldoun Sweis’ moderating the Thursday AM session featuring William Lane Craig and Gary Habermas. ***Thomas Provenzola will be speaking at the Friday AM session moderated by Craig Mitchell. The correct title of his paper is “Saving Pre-Modernity: Relational Causality & Truth” 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Atheistic Argument from Ugliness
    AN ATHEISTIC ARGUMENT FROM UGLINESS SCOTT F. AIKIN & NICHOLAOS JONES Vanderbilt University University of Alabama in Huntsville Author posting. (c) European Journal of Philosophy of Religion 7.1 (Spring 2015). This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version is available at http://www.philosophy-of- religion.eu/contents19.html This is a penultimate draft. Please cite only the published version. Abstract The theistic argument from beauty has what we call an ‘evil twin’, the argument from ugliness. The argument yields either what we call ‘atheist win’, or, when faced with aesthetic theodicies, ‘agnostic tie’ with the argument from beauty. 1 AN ATHEISTIC ARGUMENT FROM UGLINESS I. EVIL TWINS FOR TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS The theistic argument from beauty is a teleological argument. Teleological arguments take the following form: 1. The universe (or parts of it) exhibit property X 2. Property X is usually (if not always) brought about by the purposive actions of those who created objects for them to be X. 3. The cases mentioned in Premise 1 are not explained (or fully explained) by human action 4. Therefore: The universe is (likely) the product of a purposive agent who created it to be X, namely God. The variety of teleological arguments is as broad as substitution instances for X. The standard substitutions have been features of the universe (or it all) fine-tuned for life, or the fact of moral action. One further substitution has been beauty. Thus, arguments from beauty. A truism about teleological arguments is that they have evil twins.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt, a NATURAL HISTORY of NATURAL THEOLOGY
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 33 Issue 3 Article 7 7-1-2016 Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt, A NATURAL HISTORY OF NATURAL THEOLOGY Joshua C. Thurow Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Thurow, Joshua C. (2016) "Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt, A NATURAL HISTORY OF NATURAL THEOLOGY," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 33 : Iss. 3 , Article 7. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil201633367 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol33/iss3/7 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. BOOK REVIEWS A Natural History of Natural Theology, by Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt. MIT Press, 2015. Pp. xvii + 246. $40.00 (hardcover). JOSHUA C. THUROW, University of Texas at San Antonio The cognitive science of religion has attracted increasing attention from -an alytic philosophers of religion. Cognitive-evolutionary scientific theories of why humans have religious beliefs have, like counterpart explana- tions of moral beliefs, raised the question of whether religious beliefs are grounded in a cognitive process that can be trusted. Debunking arguments hold that the cognitive-evolutionary explanations of religious beliefs show that these beliefs do not track the truth of the religious facts, and conclude that we should suspend judgment about these beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Does God Exist? the Beauty and Grace of Our Own Human Bodies
    “what may be known of God the Tasaday civilization recently discovered in thing beautiful in its time” (Ecclesiastes 3:11). 1971 in the mountains of the Philippines, held is manifest in them, a belief in god. Moral Argument for God has shown it to them.” How could so many diverse peoples so wide- God exists because of the evidence of morality. ly distributed geographically and historically all Within every man is a sense of morality. While men Romans 1:19 hold to a belief in a Supreme Being? The Scriptures might differ on the specifics, all have a sense of right state this universal belief comes from God. “He and wrong and justice. A just and righteous God is has made everything beautiful in its time. Also the only cause adequate to produce a universal sense He has put eternity in their hearts, except that no of morality in man, therefore Man’s inner sense of one can find out the work that God does from morality was caused by a just and righteous God. beginning to end” (Ecclesiastes 3:11). Paul attests that men’s inner moral compass Paul gave a reasoned explanation for a uni- comes from God and reveals the God who gave it to versal belief in God. “And He has made from them. “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven Does one blood every nation of men to dwell on all against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, the face of the earth, and has determined their who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because preappointed times and the boundaries of their what may be known of God is manifest in them, for dwellings, so that they should seek the Lord, in God has shown it to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argument from Beauty
    Introduction Concept Epistemology Sense Arrangement Moral parallels Wilde Lecture 1: The Argument from Beauty Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Baylor University November 15, 2019 Introduction Concept Epistemology Sense Arrangement Moral parallels Introduction, I Many religious people find compelling the idea that the beauty of the world declares the glory of God. \The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork" (Ps. 19:1 RSV). The beauty of the world makes it psychologically easier to believe in God. Kantian argument that the instantiation of beauty can provide a moral reason to believe in a creator: we have a duty to give thanks for it, and can only sincerely do so if we believe in a creator. But do considerations of beauty provide an epistemic reason to believe in God? Introduction Concept Epistemology Sense Arrangement Moral parallels Introduction, II I will sketch reasons based on: The concept of beauty Our knowledge of beauty Our sense of beauty The beauty-friendly arrangement of the world: instantiations and accessibility. And compare with the moral argument and the problem of evil. Introduction Concept Epistemology Sense Arrangement Moral parallels Diversity Plato's Symposium: One progresses \from one [body] to two, and from two to every lovely body, from bodily beauty to the beauty of institutions, from institutions to learning, and from learning in general to the special lore that pertains to nothing but the beautiful itself". We pursue beauty in everything: it matters to us. Introduction Concept Epistemology Sense Arrangement Moral parallels Diversity Plato's Symposium: One progresses \from one [body] to two, and from two to every lovely body, from bodily beauty to the beauty of institutions, from institutions to learning, and from learning in general to the special lore that pertains to nothing but the beautiful itself".
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural History of Natural Theology the Enduring Tradition of Natural Theology Meets an Academic Newcomer, the Cognitive Science of Religion
    Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt The MIT Press release date December 2014 (US) /January 2015 (world) Available for preorder on amazon.com and amazon.co.uk http://www.amazon.com/Natural-History-Theology-Cognitive- Philosophy/dp/0262028549 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Natural-History-Theology-Cognitive- Philosophy/dp/0262028549 ! "#$%&'(%! Arguments for the existence of God, such as the moral, design, and cosmological argument, have an enduring popularity across times and cultures. This book examines the cognitive origins of the enduring fascination with natural theology, looking at the intuitions that underlie its practice. We argue that intuitions that underlie arguments in natural theology have a stable cognitive basis and emerge early in development. While natural theological arguments can be very sophisticated, they are rooted in everyday intuitions about purpose, causation, agency, and morality that emerge early in development and that are a stable part of human cognition. )(*+,!-!./%,/%! This book contains an in-depth examination of the cognitive basis of natural theological arguments, using historical and contemporary versions of these arguments as they are developed by theologians and philosophers of religion. It integrates this with theories and empirical findings from the cognitive sciences, in particular the multidisciplinary endeavor of the cognitive science of religion, which incorporates among others developmental psychology, cognitive anthropology, and cognitive neuroscience. We challenge two ideas that are widespread in cognitive science of religion, theology, and philosophy of religion: (1) that natural theology is a highly arcane endeavor, far removed from everyday cognitive dispositions, (2) that questions about the origin and justification of religious beliefs should be considered separately.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil and Humans' Relationship with God in Terrence Malick's the Tree of Life
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 17 Article 34 Issue 1 April 2013 4-1-2013 The rP oblem of Evil and Humans’ Relationship with God in Terrence Malick’s The rT ee of Life Bertha Alvarez Manninen Ph.D. Arizona State University at the West Campus, [email protected] Recommended Citation Manninen, Bertha Alvarez Ph.D. (2013) "The rP oblem of Evil and Humans’ Relationship with God in Terrence Malick’s The rT ee of Life," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 17 : Iss. 1 , Article 34. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol17/iss1/34 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The rP oblem of Evil and Humans’ Relationship with God in Terrence Malick’s The rT ee of Life Abstract Terrence Malick’s 2011 film The Tree of Life defies any attempt to be summarized in a few pat sentences. The movie tackles significant theological issues as it tells the story of one man’s journey to regain his faith after the loss of his beloved brother and a difficult relationship with his father. At the same time, it is also a film about humankind’s relationship to God, and about the kind of life human beings should strive to lead. In this paper, I will discuss two of the film’s main themes: Malick’s response to the problem of evil (or, as it is also known, the problem of suffering) and his meditations concerning what kind of relationship humans should seek with God.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountaineering and Mysticism J
    Mountaineering and Mysticism J . W. A. H ickson M Y STICISM, a term derived from the significant Greek word μύειv to shut the eyes,—μύστης, one who is initiated into the mysteries—indicates a phase or state of feeling rather than of thought, which from its very nature is not susceptible of definition: and not communicable. The utterance of the philosopher, Augustine, “If you do not ask me, I know; if you ask me, I do not know,” is a celebrated illustration of this standpoint. In history it has appeared in connection with the endeavour to grasp the ultimate nature of things; this is its philosophical aspect; or to grasp the divine essence behind appearances and enjoy communion with it; this is its re­ ligious aspect. In Spinoza’s unique metaphysical work, Ethica, both aspects are combined: in it, traditional theology underwent an euthanasia in philosophy. Deus sive Natura: Natura sive Deus. The naturalistic Pantheism of Spinoza aimed at being thoroughly rationalistic; it tried to see everything in the clear light of the noon­ day sun, and to demonstrate more geometrico the unity of Nature. Its apparent success, the apparent completeness of its synthesis, rests on the subtle intrusions of elements of feeling into a process of reasoning that has started with clear definitions and appeared to proceed with strict logic. The intuitive science of which Spinoza could not give a clear account, and which culminates in the intellec­ tual love of God (an impersonal being), represents the most impor­ tant of such intrusions. His wonderful system, which is both speculative and practical, its aim being to obtain happiness through knowledge, has appealed in its different aspects to scientists, mountaineers, and poets, and among the last to none more than to one of the greatest, a mountain lover, although not a mountaineer, who gave eloquent expression to Spinoza’s belief in the well-known lines: God dwells within, and moves the world and moulds, Himself and Nature in one form enfolds.
    [Show full text]
  • The God Delusion
    Richard Dawkins THE GOD DELUSION HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY Boston · New York CONTENTS Preface 1 1 A DEEPLY RELIGIOUS NON-BELIEVER 9 Deserved respect 11 Undeserved respect 20 2 THE GOD HYPOTHESIS 29 Polytheism 32 Monotheism 37 Secularism, the Founding Fathers and the religion of America 38 The poverty of agnosticism 46 NOMA 54 The Great Prayer Experiment 61 The Neville Chamberlain school of evolutionists 66 Little green men 69 3 ARGUMENTS FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE 75 Thomas Aquinas' 'proofs' 77 The ontological argument and other a priori arguments 80 The argument from beauty 86 The argument from personal 'experience' 87 The argument from scripture 92 viii Τ' Η Ε G Ο D DEL U S ί Ο Ν The argument from admired religious scientists 97 Pascal's Wager 103 Bayesian arguments 105 4 WHY THERE ALMOST CERTAINLY IS NO GOD 111 The Ultimate Boeing 747 113 Natural selection as a consciousness-raiser 114 Irreducible complexity 119 The worship of gaps 125 The anthropic principle: planetary version 134 The anthropic principle: cosmological version 141 An interlude at Cambridge 151 5 THE ROOTS OF RELIGION 161 The Darwinian imperative 163 Direct advantages of religion 166 Group selection 169 Religion as a by-product of something else 172 Psychologically primed for religion 179 Tread softly, because you tread on my memes 191 Cargo cults 202 6 THE ROOTS OF MORALITY: WHY ARE WE GOOD? 209 Does our moral sense have a Darwinian origin? 214 A case study in the roots of morality 222 If there is no God, why be good? 226 C Ο Ν Τ Ε Ν Τ S 7 THE 'GOOD' BOOK AND THE CHANGING
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Religion
    Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Religion INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION BEAU BRANSON, MARCUS WILLIAM HUNT, TIMOTHY D KNEPPER, ROBERT SLOAN LEE, STEVEN STEYL, HANS VAN EYGHEN, BEAU BRANSON (BOOK EDITOR), AND CHRISTINA HENDRICKS (SERIES EDITOR) Rebus Community Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Religion by Beau Branson, Marcus William Hunt, Timothy D Knepper, Robert Sloan Lee, Steven Steyl, Hans Van Eyghen, Beau Branson (Book Editor), and Christina Hendricks (Series Editor) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. DEDICATION To Roger Branson — the best dad I ever had. For all the sacrifices I know ouy made. And for all the ones I don’t. CONTENTS What is an Open Textbook? ix Christina Hendricks How to Access and Use the Books xi Christina Hendricks Introduction to the Series xiii Christina Hendricks Praise for the Book xvi Acknowledgements xviii Beau Branson and Christina Hendricks Introduction to the Book 1 Beau Branson 1. The Intertwining of Philosophy and Religion in the Western Tradition 7 Beau Branson 2. Reasons to Believe – Theoretical Arguments 18 Marcus William Hunt 3. Non-Standard Arguments for God’s Existence 30 Robert Sloan Lee 4. Reasons Not to Believe 49 Steven Steyl 5. Debunking Arguments against Theistic Belief 62 Hans Van Eyghen 6. From Philosophy of (Mono)theism to Philosophy of Religions 74 Timothy D Knepper Glossary 87 About the Contributors 91 Feedback and Suggestions 94 Adoption Form 95 Licensing and Attribution Information 96 Review Statement 98 Accessibility Assessment 99 Version History 101 WHAT IS AN OPEN TEXTBOOK? CHRISTINA HENDRICKS An open textbook is like a commercial textbook, except: (1) it is publicly available online free of charge (and at low-cost in print), and (2) it has an open license that allows others to reuse it, download and revise it, and redistribute it.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Thought on the Existence of God: Contributions and Contrasts with Contemporary Western Philosophy of Religion
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series IIA, Islam, Volume 16 Islamic Thought on the Existence of God: Contributions and contrasts with Contemporary Western Philosophy of Religion by Cafer S. Yaran The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Copyright © 2003 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Gibbons Hall B-20 620 Michigan Avenue, NE Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Yaran, Cafer S. Islamic thought on the existence of God : with contributions from contemporary Western philosophy of religion / by Cafer S. Yaran. p.cm. – (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series IIA Islam; vol. 16) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. God (Islam). 2. Islamic cosmology. 3. Philosophy, Islam. 4. Philosophy, Comparative. 5. Philosophy and religion. I. Title II. Series. B745.g63y37 2003 2003015390 212’.1—dc21 CIP ISBN 1-56518-192-1 (pbk.) Table of Contents Foreword V Preface VII Introduction a. Belief in God in Islamic Thought 1 b. The Role of Arguments in Belief in God 4 Part One. The Argument from Religious Experience Chapter I. The Argument from Religious Experience 11 a. Evidence: Experience of the Presence and Activity of God b. Evaluation: Illusion or Reality? Part Two. The Teleological Arguments Chapter II. The Argument from Wisdom (Óikmah) 33 a. Evidence: The Fine-Tuning of the Universe and Its Scientific Laws b. Evaluation: The Many-Worlds Hypotheses, and Divine Design Chapter III. The Argument from Providence (‘Ināyeh) 89 a. Evidence: The Anthropic Nature of the World and Its Beauty b.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Beauty Point Us to God?
    CanCan BeautyBeauty PointPoint UsUs toto God?God? AA PosterioriPosteriori Argument:Argument: ReasoningReasoning fromfrom beautybeauty backback toto GodGod www.prshockley.orgwww.prshockley.org ©© PaulPaul R.R. ShockleyShockley ConsiderConsider thethe followingfollowing Quote:Quote: “Now if a man believes in the existence of beautiful things, but not of Beauty itself, and cannot follow a guide who would lead him to a knowledge of it, is he not living in a dream?" Plato's Republic , 476c. Plato is the “father ” & fiercest critics of the philosophy of Aesthetics in Western thought & culture. AnAn Introduction:Introduction: IsIs itit reasonablereasonable toto believebelieve thatthat beautybeauty pointspoints usus toto God?God? OrOr isis beautybeauty merelymerely inin thethe eyeeye ofof thethe beholderbeholder?? WhileWhile notnot discountingdiscounting thethe possibilitypossibility ofof aa subjectivesubjective aspectaspect toto beauty,beauty, subjectivitysubjectivity doesdoes notnot automaticallautomaticallyy meanmean thethe nonnon --existenceexistence ofof objectiveobjective beautybeauty oror thatthat objectivityobjectivity isis necessarilynecessarily oppositionaloppositional toto subjectivsubjectivity.ity. CouldCould itit bebe thatthat bothboth objectiveobjective beautybeauty andand subjectisubjectiveve beautybeauty areare coco --extensiveextensive (i.e.,(i.e., twotwo sidessides ofof aa coin)?coin)? Consider:Consider: ArgumentsArguments andand evidencesevidences thatthat areare usedused fromfrom moralmoral lawlaw forfor GodGod ’’ss existenceexistence
    [Show full text]
  • THE INCARNATION of the SON of GOD Yforfc HORACE HART, PRINTER to the UNIVERSITY the INCARNATION
    ru :D :o THE INCARNATION OF THE SON OF GOD yforfc HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY THE INCARNATION OF THE SON OF GOD t BEING THE BAMPTON LECTURES FOR THE YEAR BY 9*0**** CHARLES GORE.(M.A) Bp- Hi PIIXCIPAL or ri-trv iiot-se ; ritxnw or TRINITY COLLRGC, OXFOID Tu ad libenuidum sosceptunis homincm non horruisti Virginis uterum JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET 1891 [All rights reserved} & EXTRACT FROM THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF THE LATE REV. JOHN HAMPTON, CANON OF SALISBURY. " I give and bequeath my Lands and Estates to the ' Chancellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Oxford ' for ever, to have and to hold all and singular the said Lands or " hereinafter Estates upon trust, and to the intents and purposes " that is to I will and that the Vice- mentioned ; say, appoint " Chancellor of the University of Oxford for the time being shall " take and receive all the rents, issues, and profits thereof, and " (after all taxes, reparations, and necessary deductions made) " that he pay all the remainder to the endowment of eight " Divinity Lecture Sermons, to be established for ever in the " said University, and to be performed in the manner following : " I direct and appoint, that, upon the first Tuesday in Easter " Term, a Lecturer may IK* yearly chosen by the Heads of Col- " leges only, and by no others, in the room adjoining to the " Printing- House, between the hours of ten in the morning and ' two in the afternoon, to preach eight Divinity Lecture "Sermons, the year following, at St.
    [Show full text]