The Rise of Master's Degrees
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Undergraduate Degree Fields
Chapter: 2/Postsecondary Education Section: Programs, Courses, and Completions Undergraduate Degree Fields In 2017–18, over two-thirds of the 1.0 million associate’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions were concentrated in three fields of study: liberal arts and sciences, general studies, and humanities (398,000 degrees); health professions and related programs (181,000 degrees); and business (118,000 degrees). Of the 2.0 million bachelor’s degrees conferred in 2017–18, more than half were concentrated in five fields of study: business (386,000 degrees); health professions and related programs (245,000 degrees); social sciences and history (160,000 degrees); engineering (122,000 degrees); and biological and biomedical sciences (119,000 degrees). In academic year 2017–18, postsecondary institutions were the following: homeland security, law enforcement, conferred 1.0 million associate’s degrees. Over two- and firefighting (3 percent, or 35,300 degrees); computer thirds (69 percent) of these degrees were concentrated and information sciences and support services (3 percent, in three fields of study: liberal arts and sciences, general or 31,500 degrees); and multi/interdisciplinary studies2 studies, and humanities (39 percent, or 398,000 degrees); (3 percent, or 31,100 degrees). Overall, 85,300 associate’s health professions and related programs (18 percent, or degrees or certificates (8 percent) were conferred in 181,000 degrees); and business1 (12 percent, or 118,000 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics degrees). -
Early Childhood Master's Degree Program (M.Ed.) Prospectus
Kent State University College of Education, Health and Human Services School of Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Studies EARLY CHILDHOOD MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAM (M.Ed) *NOTE: The M.Ed. requires a minimum of 32 semester hours of course work Name: Home Address: E-mail address: City: State: Zip code: Telephone number: Kent State ID: Date graduate work started: Advisor: Final date for completion (all coursework must be completed within the six year limit): Exit Project: Yes No Expected completion date of exit project: CONCENTRATION (if selected): ENDORSEMENT (if selected): _________________________________________________________________________________________ Instructions for Filing the Prospectus 1. During the first semester of course work, you must schedule a meeting with your advisor to discuss the self assessment form and prospectus. Consult the graduate catalog for electives prior to meeting with advisor. 2. The prospectus must be completed and filed by the end of the first year of course work in 418 White Hall. Prior to filing the prospectus in 418 White Hall, make two (2) copies. Give one (1) copy to your major advisor. Retain one (1) copy for your personal use. 3. Any deviation from the prospectus MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE by the student’s advisor. Changes are to be filed by the student with the Coordinator of Graduate Education Programs, Valorie Adkins, in Room 418 White Hall one semester prior to anticipated graduation. She can be contacted at 330-672-0559 or [email protected]. 4. You have 6 years to complete your program work. The time limit begins when you take your first course toward the degree; or if you are seeking to transfer courses, your time limit begins with the earliest of those transferred courses. -
Ece-Phd-Policy-Handbook.Pdf
The University of Alabama at Birmingham Ph.D. Doctoral Program in Early Childhood Education POLICY HANDBOOK FOR STUDENTS Revised April 12, 2018 This handbook for the Doctoral Program in Early Childhood Education and Development is for the use of students who have been approved for admission. For complete requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, students must consult their program advisor, the UAB Graduate School Catalog where you can find the Graduate Student Handbook, and the UAB Graduate School Policies and Procedures. These documents can be found by browsing the graduate school webpage. http://www.uab.edu/graduate/ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Contents PURPOSE OF THE Ph.D. PROGRAM ...................................................................................... 3 UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM ................................................................. 3 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ....................................................................................................... 3 CONCEPTUAL OVERVIEW OF Ph.D. PROGRAM ................................................................. 4 STEPS FOR COMPLETION OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE................................. 5 Benchmark Requirements ........................................................................................................ 6 COURSE OF STUDY................................................................................................................. 7 Prerequisite Courses ............................................................................................................... -
1. List of Active Partners by Country
The University of Victoria holds 288 agreements with 224 partnership institutions and organizations based in 54 countries as of September 2020. This document includes: List of active partners by country Partners by region and agreement type 1. List of Active Partners by Country Australia Australian National University Deakin University Griffith University James Cook University Macquarie University Murdoch University Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University of Adelaide University of New South Wales University of Newcastle University of South Australia University of Sydney University of Wollongong Austria FH JOANNEUM - University of Applied Sciences Johannes-Kepler-Universität Linz Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Belgium L'institut Superieur de Traducteurs et Interpretes de la Haute Ecole de Bruxelles (ISTI), - Université Libre de Bruxelles Louvain School of Management Thomas More Mechelen-Antwerpen Bhutan Jigme Singye Wangchuck School of Law Page 1 Updated Sept 2020 Brazil Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Fundação Getulio Vargas - Escola de Administracão de Empresas de São Paulo Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro Universidade de São Paulo Universidade Estadual Paulista 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho' (UNESP) Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Canada Camosun College IC-IMPACTS Canada-India Research Centre of Excellence Université de Montréal University of Ottawa University of Waterloo Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez Universidad del Desarrollo China Beihang -
How America Pays for Graduate School
Sallie Mae | Ipsos 1 How America Pays for Graduate School Sallie Mae’s national study of graduate school students Conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs 2017 How America Pays for Graduate School 2017 Sallie Mae | Ipsos About Sallie Mae® About Ipsos Sallie Mae is the nation’s saving, planning, and Ipsos is a global independent market research paying for college company. company ranking third worldwide among research firms. We’re proud to offer products and services that promote responsible personal finance and help students and families At Ipsos, we are passionately curious about people, make college happen, including markets, brands, and society. • A range of FDIC-insured savings products, including SmartyPig® We make our changing world easier and faster to navigate, and and other goal-based savings accounts, money market inspire clients to make smarter decisions. We deliver research accounts, and certificates of deposit.* In addition, Upromise® by with security, speed, simplicity, and substance. We believe it’s Sallie Mae provides financial rewards on everyday purchases to time to change the game—it’s time for Game Changers! help families save for college. • A variety of free online tips, tools, and resources that help Our commitment to driving the industry with innovative, best families plan for college and graduate school, including in class research techniques that are meaningful in today’s Scholarship Search, which offers free access to 5 million connected society is our primary goal. scholarships worth up to $24 billion, the College Planning Focusing on six research specializations, our broad range of CalculatorSM, and the College AheadSM mobile app. -
Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2006 to 2016 Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2006 to 2016 Hironao Okahana Enyu Zhou
Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2006 to 2016 Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2006 to 2016 Hironao Okahana Enyu Zhou September 2017 The CGS/GRE Survey of Graduate Enrollment and Degrees is jointly sponsored by: The CGS/GRE Survey of Graduate Enrollment and Degrees is jointly sponsored by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS) and the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) Board. For more information about the survey or the survey reports, please contact: Council of Graduate Schools Graduate Record Examinations Program One Dupont Circle NW, Suite 230 Educational Testing Service Washington, DC 20036-1146 Rosedale Road www.cgsnet.org Princeton, NJ 08541-6000 www.ets.org/gre Hironao Okahana (202) 696-1560 Carol A. Hawkes [email protected] (609) 683-2237 [email protected] Suggested citation: Okahana, H., & Zhou, E. (2017). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2006 to 2016. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools. Copyright © 2017 Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced or used in any form by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution, or information storage and retrieval systems—without the written permission of the Council of Graduate Schools, One Dupont Circle NW, Suite 230, Washington, DC 20036-1146. Printed in the United States 2 Council of Graduate Schools Quick Takes The CGS/GRE Survey of Graduate Enrollment and Degrees is the comprehensive source of information for master’s and doctoral program applications, enrollment, and degrees in the United States. This report highlights findings from Fall 2016 with detailed data tables. -
Introduction: Postgraduate Studies/ Postgraduate Pedagogy? Alison Lee and Bill Green University of Technology, Sydney and Deakin University
Feature: Postgraduate studies/postgraduate pedagogy Introduction: postgraduate studies/ postgraduate pedagogy? Alison Lee and Bill Green University of Technology, Sydney and Deakin University In recent years, the nature and quality of postgraduate studies in collecting information about postgraduate research students’ experi- higher education has become a matter of increasing interest and ences that can inform guidelines about good supervisory practices (eg concern. This has been partly produced out of the collapse of the binary Parry and Hayden 1994; Powles, 1993), as well as on across-Faculty system in the mid eighties and the subsequent restructuring and re- understandings and practices regarding postgraduate research super- positioning of the higher education sector, following the interventions vision and study (eg Whittle, 1994), with the Zuber-Skerritt and Ryan and decisions of the then Minister for Education in the Federal Labor 1994 collection on ‘quality’ in postgraduate education being a signifi- Government, in direct relation to new and changing economic impera- cant and representative text in this regard. The indications are that such tives. What has emerged on the scene is a greatly expanded number of orientations and regimes in research are likely to be further institution- universities, within an across the board re-assessment and re-organi- alised if rational ‘science’ models of research and supervision are sation of the academic-institutional agenda to take more explicitly and adopted uncritically as normative across the academic-institutional formally into account notions of accountability, efficiency, spectrum, as seems to be the trend, in accordance with new bureau- performativity, professionalisation and vocationalism. More broadly, cratic logics of funding and accountability. -
1/4 Undergraduate Degree and Graduation Requirements
Undergraduate Degree and Graduation Requirements Responsible Official: Provost Responsible Office: Registrar Policy Purpose The purpose of this policy is to define requirements for earning an undergraduate degree and graduating from East Tennessee State University (ETSU). Policy Statement I. Undergraduate Degree Requirements • Grades o Minimum overall Grade Point Average (GPA) of 2.0 o Minimum GPA of 2.0 in each of the following at ETSU: . All courses . Major . Minor (if applicable) o Other published grade requirements for the degree program • Credits o All baccalaureate degrees require 120 credits unless approved by the ETSU Board of Trustees o At least: . 50 of the credits required for the degree must be earned at four-year colleges or universities . 25% of the total credits required for the degree must be earned through instruction offered by ETSU . Six credits in the major must be earned at ETSU . One foreign language course with a number of 2020 or higher with a grade of at least C- for the Bachelor of Arts degree. Prerequisites could include courses numbered 1010, 1020, and/or 2010 to prepare for success in 2020. o Credits earned in remedial or developmental courses do not fulfill ETSU’s baccalaureate degree requirements. • General Education Requirements o Complete (41-42) semester hours in the following subject areas Credits Areas 6 Written Composition 1/4 3 Oral Communication 3 Literature 3 Fine Arts 3 Humanities Electives 6 Social and Behavioral Sciences 6 History* 8 Natural Sciences 3-4 Mathematics *Six (6) credits of American history or three (3) credits of American history and three (3) credits of Tennessee history. -
Because at CMU, It's All About You
Because at CMU, it’s all about you. Distance learning programs that meet your schedule Welcome Distance learning courses from Central Michigan University give you control over your time. You can take classes at home, or on the road, early in the morning, or late at night. CMU – accredited and experienced Central Michigan University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. Founded in 1892, CMU is Michigan’s fifth largest state university. More than 50,000 students have earned their degrees through CMU’s off-campus degree programs since 1971. Today CMU serves more than 12,000 students at over 60 locations in the United States, Canada and Mexico and through its distance learning courses. Programs Complete a bachelor’s degree Whether you already have some college credit, or you’re just starting out, CMU’s distance learning classes can help you complete an undergraduate degree. The Bachelor of Science Degree with an Option in Community Development/Health Sciences is available entirely through distance learning. In fall 2003 we are scheduled to begin offering the Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration. Check our web site www.ddl.cmich.edu for additional information on this new program in the coming months. You can complete other undergraduate degrees by combining CMU distance learning courses with previous college credit, credit for work or life experience or classes taken at CMU centers. Earn a graduate degree You can use distance learning master’s level courses to add flexibility to your graduate studies, whether you’re attending classes at a CMU program center, at CMU’s main campus in Mount Pleasant, or at another institution. -
The State of the Humanities: Higher Education 2015
american academy of arts & sciences THE STATE OF THE HUMANITIES: HIGHER EDUCATION 2015 humanitiesindicators.org 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138 telephone: 617-576-5000 email: [email protected] website: www.amacad.org THE STATE OF THE HUMANITIES: HIGHER EDUCATION 2015 Table of Contents 3 Introduction 4 Estimated Number of Departments in Surveyed Humanities Disciplines, Fall 2007 and Fall 2012 5 Percentage of Humanities Departments Ceasing to Grant Degrees at Some Level, by Control of Institution and Discipline, Fall 2007–Fall 2012 6 Degree Completions in the Humanities as a Percentage of All Degree Completions at That Level, 1987–2013 7 Humanities Bachelor’s Degrees Earned as “Second Majors,” 2001–2013 8 Associate’s Degree Completions in Selected Fields as a Percentage of All Associate’s Degree Completions, 1987–2013 9 Humanities Bachelor’s Degree Completions as a Percentage of All Bachelor’s Degree Completions, by Control of Institution, 1987–2013 10 Advanced Placement Exams Taken in Major Fields, 1996–2013 11 Median Number of College Credits Earned in Selected Subjects by 2008 Graduates, by Student Major 12 Median Annual Earnings of Full-Time Workers with Bachelor’s Degrees in Selected Fields, by Highest Degree Earned and Undergraduate Major, 2012 13 Occupations of Humanities Majors, by Highest Degree Earned and Undergraduate Major, 2012 14 Number of Postsecondary Faculty Teaching in Selected Academic Fields, 1999–2012 15 Percentage of Humanities Faculty Members Employed Part-Time or Off the Tenure Track, by Discipline, -
Engaging Undergraduates in Science Research: Not Just About Faculty Willingness
Res High Educ DOI 10.1007/s11162-010-9189-9 Engaging Undergraduates in Science Research: Not Just About Faculty Willingness M. Kevin Eagan Jr. • Jessica Sharkness • Sylvia Hurtado • Cynthia M. Mosqueda • Mitchell J. Chang Received: 23 August 2010 Ó The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Despite the many benefits of involving undergraduates in research and the growing number of undergraduate research programs, few scholars have investigated the factors that affect faculty members’ decisions to involve undergraduates in their research projects. We investigated the individual factors and institutional contexts that predict faculty members’ likelihood of engaging undergraduates in their research project(s). Using data from the Higher Education Research Institute’s 2007–2008 Faculty Survey, we employ hierarchical generalized linear modeling to analyze data from 4,832 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty across 194 institutions to examine how organizational citizenship behavior theory and social exchange theory relate to mentoring students in research. Key findings show that faculty who work in the life sciences and those who receive government funding for their research are more likely to involve undergraduates in their research project(s). In addition, faculty at liberal arts or historically Black colleges are significantly more likely to involve undergraduate students in research. Implications for advancing undergraduate research opportunities are discussed. Keywords Undergraduate research experience Á STEM faculty Á Mentorship Á Hierarchical generalized linear modeling Á Organizational climate Introduction Students who initially enter college with the intention of majoring in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) fields have substantially lower completion rates in these disciplines than do their peers who enter with aspirations for a non-STEM major (Huang et al. -
Online Undergraduate Degree Task Force Report
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ACADEMIC SENATE BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ Mary Gauvain Chair of the Assembly of the Academic Senate Telephone: (510) 987-0887 Faculty Representative to the Regents Email:[email protected] University of California 1111 Franklin Street, 12th Floor Oakland, California 94607-5200 September 8, 2020 CHAIRS OF SENATE DIVISIONS AND COMMITTEES: Re: Systemwide Review of the Report of the Online Undergraduate Degree Task Force Dear Colleagues, Last year, the Academic Council formed an Online Undergraduate Degree Task Force to examine the implications of possibly creating full-time, online, undergraduate degree programs at UC. Its July 2020 report provides three distinct policy options with the strengths and weaknesses of each. Option 1 (UC-Quality On-campus Degree) would prohibit fully remote undergraduate degree programs and require at least one-third of all major units and also one-third of total units to be earned in non-remote courses; Option 2 (UC-Quality Remote Degree) would support the formation of entirely remote degree programs, but require that programs meet all ordinary expectations for a UC degree; Option 3 (Instruction-Only Remote Degree) would allow fully remote degree programs that satisfy the same coursework expectations as UC’s face-to-face programs, but may not guarantee equivalent out of classroom opportunities. Please submit comments to the Academic Senate office at [email protected] by December 9, 2020 to allow us to compile and summarize comments for the Academic Council’s December 16 meeting. As always, any committee that considers these matters outside its jurisdiction or charge may decline to comment.