NCCN's Principles of Pathologic Review and Biomarker Testing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NCCN's Principles of Pathologic Review and Biomarker Testing NCCN’s Principles of Pathologic Review and Biomarker Testing Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 lmmunohistochemical Criteria for Scoring HER2 Expression in Gastrointestinal Cancer1 HER2 Surgical Specimen Expression Biopsy Specimen Expression Overexpression Pattern, lmmunohistochemistry Pattern, lmmunohistochemistry Assessment No reactivity or membranous No reactivity or no membranous 0 reactivity in <10% Negative reactivity in any cancer cell of cancer cells Faint or barely perceptible Cluster of ≥5 cancer cells with a faint membranous reactivity in ≥10% of or barely perceptible membranous 1+ Negative cancer cells; cells are reactive only reactivity irrespective of percentage in part of their membrane of cancer cells positive Cluster of ≥5 cancer cells with Weak to moderate complete, a weak to moderate complete, basolateral, or lateral 2+ basolateral, or lateral membranous Equivocal membranous reactivity in ≥10% of reactivity irrespective of percentage cancer cells of cancer cells positive Cluster of five or more cancer cells Strong complete, basolateral, or with a strong complete, basolateral, 3+ lateral membranous reactivity in or lateral membranous reactivity Positive ≥10% of cancer cells irrespective of percentage of cancer cells positive Perform ISH to determine if cancer cells are ISH-negative or ISH-positive NCCN’s Principles of Pathologic Review and Biomarker Testing Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 Microsatellite Instability (MSI) or Mismatch Repair (MMR) Testing1 • Used for locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric cancer in patients who are candidates for treatment with PD-1 inhibitors • Performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue • Results interpreted as MSl-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) in accordance with CAP DNA Mismatch Repair Biomarker Reporting Guidelines • Refer patients with MSI-H or dMMR tumors to a genetics counselor for further assessment • No loss of nuclear expression of MMR proteins: no evidence of deficient mismatch repair (low probability of MSI-H) MMR • Loss of nuclear expression of one or more MMR Interpretation proteins: deficient mismatch repair • Refer patients with MSI-H or dMMR tumors to a genetics counselor for further assessment • Microsatellite stable (MSS) • MSI-Low (MSI-L) – 1%-29% of markers exhibit instability – 1 of the 5 National Cancer Institute (NCI) or MSI mononucleotide markers exhibits instability Interpretation • MSI-High (MSI-H) – ≥30% of the markers exhibit instability – 2 or more of the 5 NCI or mono-nucleotide markers exhibit instability NCCN’s Principles of Pathologic Review and Biomarker Testing Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 PD-L1 Testing1 • Used for locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric carcinomas in patients who are candidates for treatment with PD-1 inhibitors • An FDA-approved companion diagnostic test for use on FFPE tissue is available as an aid in identifying patients for treatment with PD-1 inhibitors • Should be performed only in CLIA-approved laboratories • This is a qualitative immuno-histochemical assay using anti–PD-L1 antibodies for the detection of PD-L1 protein in FFPE tissues from gastric adenocarcinoma Assessment of • A minimum of 100 tumor cells must be present in PD-L1 Protein the PD-L1–stained slide for the specimen to be Expression considered adequate for PD-L1 evaluation in Gastric • A specimen is considered to have PD-L1 expression if Cancers the Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥1 – CPS is the number of PD-L1 staining cells (ie, tumor cells, lymphocytes, macrophages) divided by the total number of viable tumor cells, multiplied by 100 NCCN’s Principles of Pathologic Review and Biomarker Testing Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 Colon Cancer2 KRAS, NRAS, • All patients with metastatic colorectal cancer should and BRAF have tumor tissue genotyped for RAS (KRAS and Mutation NRAS) and BRAF mutations individually or as part of Testing an NGS panel Microsatellite Instability • Universal MMR or MSI testing is recommended in all or Mismatch newly diagnosed patients with colon cancer Repair Testing • Diagnostic testing is via immunohistochemistry, FISH, or NGS • Positive by immunohistochemistry is defined as: 3+ staining in more than 50% of tumor cells – 3+ staining is defined as an intense membrane staining HER2 Testing that can be circumferential, basolateral, or lateral – Reflex those with a 2+ HER2 score to FISH testing » Positive when the HER2:CEP17 ratio is ≥2 in more than 50% of tumor cells • Anti-HER2 therapy is only indicated in HER2-amplified tumors that are also RAS and BRAF wild type • NTRK fusions are extremely rare in colorectal carcinomas NTRK Fusions • Methods for detecting NTRK fusions are IHC, FISH, DNA-based NGS, and RNA-based NGS 1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines. Gastric Cancer. Version 3.2020 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric_blocks.pdf. 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines. Colon Cancer. NCCN Answer Blocks™. Version 4.2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon_blocks.pdf. Gastric and Colorectal Cancer: Current Treatment Algorithms and Select Clinical Trials Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 The Evolving Treatment Algorithm With Targeted Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer1 If progression and PS 0-1, second-line treatment: ramucirumab-based, irinotecan, paclitaxel, or clinical trial ECOG/PS 0-1 If progression and PS first-line treatment: 0-1, third-line treatment: platinum + trifluridine/tipiracil or fluoropyrimidine ± clinical trial trastuzumab (if HER2+) If progression and PS If CPS ≥1, third-line 0-1 and MSI-H tumor, treatment: New diagnosis of GC second-line treatment: pembrolizumab PS, blood analysis, pembrolizumab physical examination, If HER2-positive pathology report with and received prior HER2 status trastuzumab-based regimen: newly FDA approved T-DXd ECOG PS >2 Best supportive care Gastric and Colorectal Cancer: Current Treatment Algorithms and Select Clinical Trials Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 Diagnosis of Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer2,3 Identify patient characteristics according to performance status, comorbidities, age, previous adjuvant treatment, quality of life, acceptance of toxicities, and patient preferences Unfit for intensive treatment: FP + anti-EGFR (if RAS wt) Totally unfit: Fit patients FP + bev Best supportive care Dose-adjusted doublet CT Treatment Goal: Cure Second Step Surgery ± CT in “clearly resectable” metastases Focus on treatment goals Preoperative CT in “potentially resectable disease” according to resectability of MDT metastases, sites of metastases, pattern of progression, and Treatment Goal: Disease Control tumor burden Best combination of CT ± surgery ± locoregional treatments in oligometastatic disease Third Step Evaluate disease characteristics according to primary tumor location (left vs right) and molecular profile (RAS/BRAF status, MSI status and HER2 overexpression, NTRK rearrangements) Trastuzumab + (pertuzumab or lapatinib) and trastuzumab deruxtecan are recommended by the NCCN guidelines as initial therapy for patients with HER2-amplified and BRAF wild-type, advanced CRC, who are not appropriate for intensive therapy Gastric and Colorectal Cancer: Current Treatment Algorithms and Select Clinical Trials Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 HER2+ Gastric Cancer4 PD-1 Inhibitor + Monoclonal Antibody + CTX NCT03615326: KEYNOTE-811 Phase 3 Recruiting 732 participants Pembrolizumab + trastuzumab + CTX Monoclonal Antibody ± PD-1 Inhibitor ± CTX ± Dual CPI NCT04082364: MAHOGANY Phase 2/3 Recruiting 850 participants Margetuximab +/- INCMGA00012 +/- CTX +/- MGD013 +/- trastuzumab ADC ADC CTLA-4 Inhibitor or CTX + PD-1 Inhibitor + NCT03556345 NCT04014075: DESTINY-Gastric02 Monoclonal Antibody Active (127), not recruiting Recruiting 72 participants NCT03409848: INTEGA RC48-ADC Trastuzumab deruxtecan Active (97), not recruiting Ipilimumab or FOLFOX + nivolumab + trastuzumab Phase 2 ADC Bispecific Antibody + CTX NCT03329690: DESTINY-Gastric01 NCT03929666 Active (220), not recruiting Recruiting 115 participants Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician's choice (irinotecan or paclitaxel) Zanidatamab + CTX vs physician's choice ADC + PD-L1 Inhibitor + CTX Monoclonal Antibody + PD-1 Inhibitor Bispecific Antibody + PD-1 Inhibitor + CTX NCT04379596: DESTINY-Gastric03 NCT02689284 NCT04276493 Phase 1b/2 Recruiting 220 participants Active (95), not recruiting Recruiting 50 participants Trastuzumab deruxtecan ± durvalumab ± CTX Margetuximab + pembrolizumab Zanidatamab + tislelizumab + CTX ADC + PD-1 Inhibitor NCT04280341 Phase 1 Not yet recruiting (50) RC48-ADC + JS001 Gastric and Colorectal Cancer: Current Treatment Algorithms and Select Clinical Trials Full abbreviations, accreditation, and disclosure information available at PeerView.com/PXC40 Immunotherapy and Combinations for Gastric Cancer4 Immunotherapy + CTX Immunotherapy + CTX Immunotherapy + CTX Phase 3 NCT03745170: ORIENT-16 NCT03675737: KEYNOTE-859 NCT03221426: KEYNOTE-585 Recruiting 650 participants Recruiting 1,542 participants Recruiting 1,000 participants
Recommended publications
  • RP - HPLC Method Development & Validation for the Simultaneous Estimation of Encorafenib and Binimetinib in API & Tablet Dosage Form
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 ResearchGate Impact Factor (2018): 0.28 | SJIF (2018): 7.426 RP - HPLC Method Development & Validation for the Simultaneous Estimation of Encorafenib and Binimetinib in API & Tablet Dosage Form Kafiya Suroor1, Kudaravalli Sreedevi2 Department of Quality Assurance, Sultan –ul-Uloom College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, India Abstract: A new RP-HPLC method was developed, validated and adapted for the estimation of encorafenib and binimetinib in bulk and tablet formulation. In this method, separation and assay of encorafenib and binimetinib was done in stationary phase using Agilent C18 column with mobile phase of 0.1M dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (pH 4.0) and methanol in 50:50 vol/vol ratio. The Binimetinib was eluted at 3.448 min and encorafenib at 5.795 min. Linearity ranges are 7.5-22.5 μg/ml and 37.5-112.50 μg/ml with regression coefficient values of 0.9996 and 0.9997 for binimetinib and encorafenib respectively. The LOD values found were binimetinib – 0.017 µg/ml and encorafenib – 0.114 µg/ml, and the LOQ values of binimetinib – 0.058 µg/ml and encorafenib – 0.381 µg/ml. Validation parameters examined following suggestions of ICH are accurate ample for the supposed assay. The approach is confirmed as splendid method for assay of encorafenib and binimetinib in tablet formula with excellent assay percentage values. Keywords: RP-HPLC, Encorafenib, Binimetinib, Antineoplastic drugs 1. Introduction dose of binimetinib is 45 mg orally twice daily and of encorafenib is 450 mg orally once daily. Approval by FDA Encorafenib and Binimetanib belong to the class of was based on a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, antineoplastic agents.
    [Show full text]
  • DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION in the MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1
    Effective Date: 08/01/2021 DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IN THE MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1 Therapeutic Category Drug Class Trade Name Generic Name HCPCS Procedure Code HCPCS Procedure Code Description Anti-infectives Antiretrovirals, HIV CABENUVA cabotegravir-rilpivirine C9077 Injection, cabotegravir and rilpivirine, 2mg/3mg Antithrombotic Agents von Willebrand Factor-Directed Antibody CABLIVI caplacizumab-yhdp C9047 Injection, caplacizumab-yhdp, 1 mg Cardiology Antilipemic EVKEEZA evinacumab-dgnb C9079 Injection, evinacumab-dgnb, 5 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent BERINERT c1 esterase J0597 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Berinert, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent CINRYZE c1 esterase J0598 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Cinryze, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent FIRAZYR icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent HAEGARDA c1 esterase J0599 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), (Haegarda), 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent ICATIBANT (generic) icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent KALBITOR ecallantide J1290 Injection, ecallantide, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent RUCONEST c1 esterase J0596 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (recombinant), Ruconest, 10 units Injection, lanadelumab-flyo, 1 mg (code may be used for Medicare when drug administered under Cardiology Hemostatic Agent TAKHZYRO lanadelumab-flyo J0593 direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self-administered) Cardiology Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension EPOPROSTENOL (generic)
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Reference: FOI 414 - 2021
    FOI Reference: FOI 414 - 2021 Title: Researching the Incidence and Treatment of Melanoma and Breast Cancer Date: February 2021 FOI Category: Pharmacy FOI Request: 1. How many patients are currently (in the past 3 months) undergoing treatment for melanoma, and how many of these are BRAF+? 2. In the past 3 months, how many melanoma patients (any stage) were treated with the following: • Cobimetinib • Dabrafenib • Dabrafenib AND Trametinib • Encorafenib AND Binimetinib • Ipilimumab • Ipilimumab AND Nivolumab • Nivolumab • Pembrolizumab • Trametinib • Vemurafenib • Vemurafenib AND Cobimetinib • Other active systemic anti-cancer therapy • Palliative care only 3. If possible, could you please provide the patients treated in the past 3 months with the following therapies for metastatic melanoma ONLY: • Ipilimumab • Ipilimumab AND Nivolumab • Nivolumab • Pembrolizumab • Any other therapies 4. In the past 3 months how many patients were treated with the following for breast cancer? • Abemaciclib + Anastrozole/Exemestane/Letrozole • Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant • Alpelisib + Fulvestrant • Atezolizumab • Bevacizumab [Type text] • Eribulin • Everolimus + Exemestane • Fulvestrant as a single agent • Gemcitabine + Paclitaxel • Lapatinib • Neratinib • Olaparib • Palbociclib + Anastrozole/Exemestane/Letrozole • Palbociclib + Fulvestrant • Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel • Ribociclib + Anastrozole/Exemestane/Letrozole • Ribociclib + Fulvestrant • Talazoparib • Transtuzumab + Paclitaxel • Transtuzumab as a single agent • Trastuzumab emtansine • Any other
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Risk Management Plan for Braftovi
    Summary of the risk management plan Summary of the risk management plan for BRAFTOVI This is a summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for BRAFTOVI when administered in combination with MEKTOVI or cetuximab. The RMP details important risks of BRAFTOVI in combination with MEKTOVI or cetuximab, how these risks can be minimised, and how more information will be obtained about BRAFTOVI in combination with MEKTOVI or cetuximab risks and uncertainties (missing information). Summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for BRAFTOVI and its package leaflets give essential information to healthcare professionals and patients on how BRAFTOVI should be used. This summary of the RMP for BRAFTOVI when administered in combination with MEKTOVI or cetuximab should be read in the context of all this information including the assessment reports of the evaluation and the plain-language summary, all of which are part of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). Important new concerns or changes to current concerns will be included in future updates of the RMP for BRAFTOVI. I. The medicine and what it is used for BRAFTOVI is authorised in combination with MEKTOVI for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation (see SmPC for the full indication). The active substance of BRAFTOVI is encorafenib and of MEKTOVI is binimetinib and both are given by the oral route of administration. BRAFTOVI in combination with cetuximab is authorised for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with a BRAF V600E mutation, who have received prior systemic therapy. Cetuximab is given by intravenous infusion.
    [Show full text]
  • New Century Health Policy Changes April 2021
    Policy # Drug(s) Type of Change Brief Description of Policy Change new Pepaxto (melphalan flufenamide) n/a n/a new Fotivda (tivozanib) n/a n/a new Cosela (trilaciclib) n/a n/a Add inclusion criteria: NSCLC UM ONC_1089 Libtayo (cemiplimab‐rwlc) Negative change 2.Libtayo (cemiplimab) may be used as montherapy in members with locally advanced, recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, with PD‐L1 ≥ 50%, negative for actionable molecular markers (ALK, EGFR, or ROS‐1) Add inclusion criteria: a.As a part of primary/de�ni�ve/cura�ve‐intent concurrent chemo radia�on (Erbitux + Radia�on) as a single agent for members with a UM ONC_1133 Erbitux (Cetuximab) Positive change contraindication and/or intolerance to cisplatin use OR B.Head and Neck Cancers ‐ For recurrent/metasta�c disease as a single agent, or in combination with chemotherapy. Add inclusion criteria: UM ONC_1133 Erbitux (Cetuximab) Negative change NOTE: Erbitux (cetuximab) + Braftovi (encorafenib) is NCH preferred L1 pathway for second‐line or subsequent therapy in the metastatic setting, for BRAFV600E positive colorectal cancer.. Add inclusion criteria: B.HER‐2 Posi�ve Breast Cancer i.Note #1: For adjuvant (post‐opera�ve) use in members who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy/received neoadjuvant therapy and did not have any residual disease in the breast and/or axillary lymph nodes, Perjeta (pertuzumab) use is restricted to node positive stage II and III disease only. ii.Note #2: Perjeta (pertuzumab) use in the neoadjuvant (pre‐opera�ve) se�ng requires radiographic (e.g., breast MRI, CT) and/or pathologic confirmation of ipsilateral (same side) axillary nodal involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of BRAF-Targeted Therapy for Advanced Melanoma in the Immunotherapy Era
    Current Oncology Reports (2019) 21: 76 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-019-0827-x MELANOMA (RJ SULLIVAN, SECTION EDITOR) The Role of BRAF-Targeted Therapy for Advanced Melanoma in the Immunotherapy Era Vito Vanella1 & Lucia Festino 1 & Claudia Trojaniello1 & Maria Grazia Vitale1,2 & Antonio Sorrentino1 & Miriam Paone1 & Paolo A. Ascierto 1 Published online: 29 July 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review The treatment of advanced melanoma has changed dramatically in recent years with several new drugs having been approved for the treatment of melanoma since 2011. This review aims to evaluate the role of BRAF-targeted therapy for advanced melanoma in the immunotherapy era. Recent Findings Currently, in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma, anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) is the main treatment. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) is also an important option for these patients, resulting in a better outcome, but with less favorable toxicity profile. In patients with BRAF mutations, three regimens of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors are now approved (vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, dabrafenib plus trametinib, and encorafenib plus binimetinib), which achieve rapid antitumor responses and a significant survival benefit. In these patients, as well as in BRAF wild-type patients, immunotherapy can be also effective and is regularly used. Summary Immunotherapy and targeted therapy have become the new standards of care, substantially improving survival rates. However, many questions still remain unanswered, such as what is the best first- and second-line treatment and the best treatment sequence. New combinations of drugs, targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy, and sequencing approaches are now underway in many ongoing clinical trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Braftovi, INN-Encorafenib
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions. 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Braftovi 50 mg hard capsules Braftovi 75 mg hard capsules 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Braftovi 50 mg hard capsules Each hard capsule contains 50 mg of encorafenib. Braftovi 75 mg hard capsules Each hard capsule contains 75 mg of encorafenib. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Hard capsule (capsule). Braftovi 50 mg hard capsules Orange opaque cap and flesh opaque body, printed with a stylised “A” on the cap and “LGX 50mg” on the body. The length of the capsule is approximately 22 mm. Braftovi 75 mg hard capsules Flesh coloured opaque cap and white opaque body, printed with a stylised “A” on the cap and “LGX 75mg” on the body. The length of the capsule is approximately 23 mm. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Encorafenib is indicated: - in combination with binimetinib for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation (see sections 4.4 and 5.1). - in combination with cetuximab, for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with a BRAF V600E mutation, who have received prior systemic therapy (see sections 4.4 and 5.1). 4.2 Posology and method of administration Encorafenib treatment should be initiated and supervised under the responsibility of a physician experienced in the use of anticancer medicinal products.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    IN THIS ISSUE The HER2T798I Mutation Promotes Acquired Resistance to Neratinib • A patient with breast cancer • HER2T798I acquisition promoted • Patients with HER2L869R/T798I tumors harboring the HER2L869R mutation neratinib resistance, but cells remained may respond to afatinib even after initially responded to neratinib. sensitive to afatinib in vitro. neratinib resistance develops. The receptor tyrosine kinase Consistent with these findings, HER2L869R expression trans- HER2 (also known as ERBB2) is formed MCF10A breast epithelial cells, and neratinib blocked subject to activating mutations the activity of HER2L869R. Based on these findings, the patient in a subset of breast cancers. was enrolled in a clinical trial to receive single-agent neratinib Irreversible EGFR/HER2 tyros- and exhibited an excellent clinical response. The patient even- ine kinase inhibitors includ- tually progressed on neratinib, and NGS detected an acquired ing neratinib and afatinib have HER2T798I mutation. Computational models predicted that demonstrated preclinical activity this mutation would result in steric hindrance to reduce ner- against HER2-mutant tumors atinib binding. Indeed, the T798I mutation reduced HER2 and clinical trials are ongoing. stability and rendered HER2L869R-transformed cells refrac- Hanker and colleagues identified aHER2 kinase domain tory to neratinib, suggesting that neratinib treatment selects mutation (HER2L869R) in a patient with estrogen receptor– for the HER2T798I mutation to promote neratinib resistance. positive, progesterone receptor–positive lobular breast carci- HER2L869R/T798I cells that had developed resistance to ner- noma through targeted capture next-generation sequencing atinib showed sensitivity to afatinib. In addition to identify- (NGS) of DNA from a skin metastasis. Structural modeling ing HER2T798I as an acquired neratinib-resistant mutation, predicted that the HER2L869R mutation would destabilize the these results suggest that patients with this mutation may inactive kinase conformation to activate HER2.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparator Report on Cancer in Europe 2019 −Disease Burden, Costs and Access to Medicines
    COMPARATOR REPORT ON CANCER IN EUROPE 2019 −DISEASE BURDEN, COSTS AND ACCESS TO MEDICINES THOMAS HOFMARCHER GUNNAR BRÅDVIK CHRISTER SVEDMAN PETER LINDGREN BENGT JÖNSSON IHE REPORT NILS WILKING 2019:7 COMPARATOR REPORT ON CANCER IN EUROPE 2019 – DISEASE BURDEN, COSTS AND ACCESS TO MEDICINES Thomas Hofmarcher Gunnar Brådvik Christer Svedman Peter Lindgren Bengt Jönsson Nils Wilking IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Updated version: October 2020 Please cite this report as: Hofmarcher, T., Brådvik, G., Svedman, C., Lindgren, P., Jönsson, B., Wilking, N. Comparator Report on Cancer in Europe 2019 – Disease Burden, Costs and Access to Medicines. IHE Report 2019:7. IHE: Lund, Sweden. This report was commissioned and funded by EFPIA - the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations and based on independent research delivered by IHE. EFPIA has had no influence or editorial control over the content of this report, and the views and opinions of the authors are not necessarily those of EFPIA. IHE REPORT 2019:7 e-ISSN: 1651-8187 ISSN: 1651-7628 The report can be downloaded from IHE’s website. www.ihe.se | [email protected] COMPARATOR REPORT ON CANCER IN EUROPE 2019 Foreword Cancer care remains one of the most intensely discussed health policy issues in Europe. Demographic factors such as an ageing population, in part driven by advancements in other medical fields, have led to an increased disease burden caused by cancer, both to patients and to the health care system as a whole. At the same time, there has been significant scientific advancements made, in some cases transforming cancer from a fatal to a chronic disease which in turn introduces new challenges that need to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • SABCS 2020 – Focus on Breast Cancer
    EPICS Conference Coverage: SABCS 2020 – Focus on Breast Cancer Chair: Adam Brufsky Faculty: Mark Pegram, Peter Kaufman, Joyce O’Shaughnessy (joining 9.30 AM), Nadia Harbeck, Miguel Martin, Hope Rugo Date: Monday, December 14, 2020 Time: 9.00 AM – 12.00 PM EST Time EST Topic Speaker/Moderator 9.00 AM Welcome and Introductions Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD (10 min) CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Other Targeted Agents for ER+ Breast Cancer • GS1-01. Primary outcome analysis of invasive disease-free survival for monarchE: abemaciclib combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy for high risk early breast cancer. O’Shaughnessy et al. • GS1-02. Phase III study of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative primary breast cancer and with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): First results from PENELOPE-B. Loibl et al. • GS1-04. Correlative biomarker analysis of intrinsic subtypes and efficacy across the MONALEESA Phase III studies. Prat et al. 9.10 AM • PD2-01. High Ki-67 as a biomarker for identifying Miguel Martin, MD, PhD (10 min) patients with high risk early breast cancer treated in monarchE. Harbeck et al. • PD2-03. Treatment persistence and dose modifications in the PALLAS trial: PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. Mayer et al. • GS4-02. E2112: randomized phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy plus entinostat/placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group. Connolly et al. • PD1-01. Open-label, randomized, phase 2 study of sapanisertib (TAK-228/MLN0128) in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with Aptitude Health - US Aptitude Health - EU Page 1 of 6 5901-C Peachtree Dunwoody Road NE Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 104 Suite 200 2595 AN The Hague Atlanta, GA 30328, US the Netherlands aptitudehealth.com Copyright © 2020 Aptitude Health.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future Margaret Ottaviano 1,2,3,*,† , Emilio Francesco Giunta 4,† , Marianna Tortora 3 , Marcello Curvietto 5, Laura Attademo 2, Davide Bosso 2, Cinzia Cardalesi 2, Mario Rosanova 2, Pietro De Placido 1, Erica Pietroluongo 1 , Vittorio Riccio 1, Brigitta Mucci 1, Sara Parola 1, Maria Grazia Vitale 5, Giovannella Palmieri 3 , Bruno Daniele 2 , Ester Simeone 5 and on behalf of SCITO YOUTH ‡ 1 Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; [email protected] (P.D.P.); [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (V.R.); [email protected] (B.M.); [email protected] (S.P.) 2 Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; [email protected] (L.A.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (B.D.) 3 CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, 80131 Naples, Italy; [email protected] (M.T.); [email protected] (G.P.) 4 Department of Precision Medicine, Università Degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; [email protected] 5 Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.G.V.); [email protected] (E.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ Membership of the SCITO YOUTH is provided in the Acknowledgments. Citation: Ottaviano, M.; Giunta, E.F.; Tortora, M.; Curvietto, M.; Attademo, Abstract: As widely acknowledged, 40–50% of all melanoma patients harbour an activating BRAF L.; Bosso, D.; Cardalesi, C.; Rosanova, mutation (mostly BRAF V600E).
    [Show full text]
  • BRAFTOVI (Encorafenib) RATIONALE for INCLUSION in PA PROGRAM
    BRAFTOVI (encorafenib) RATIONALE FOR INCLUSION IN PA PROGRAM Background Braftovi (encorafenib) is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with certain cancers with BRAF mutations. Mutations in the BRAF gene, such as BRAF V600E, can result in constitutively activated BRAF kinases that may stimulate tumor cell growth. Braftovi targets BRAF V600E as well as other kinases and inhibits the activity of these kinases, thereby inhibiting tumor growth and proliferation (1). Regulatory Status FDA approved indications: Braftovi is a kinase inhibitor indicated: (1) • In combination with binimetinib, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test • In combination with cetuximab, for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with a BRAF V600E mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test, after prior therapy Limitations of use: (1) Braftovi is not indicated for treatment of patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma or wild-type BRAF CRC. Confirmation of the presence of BRAF V600E or V600K mutation in tumor specimens prior to the initiation of Braftovi. New primary malignancies, cutaneous and non-cutaneous can occur during therapy as well as major hemorrhagic events, uveitis, embryo-fetal toxicity, and QT prolongation. Prescribers must monitor for these adverse events and adjust the dosage, interrupt, or discontinue therapy as indicated (1). Safety and effectiveness of Braftovi in pediatric patients have not been established (1). Summary Braftovi (encorafenib) is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with certain cancers with BRAF mutations. Confirm the presence of BRAF V600E or V600K mutation in tumor specimens prior to the initiation of Braftovi.
    [Show full text]