DOCSLIB.ORG

“We Will Force You to Confess” Torture and Unlawful Military Detention in Rwanda WATCH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“We Will Force You to Confess” Torture and Unlawful Military Detention in Rwanda WATCH HUMAN RIGHTS “We Will Force You to Confess” Torture and Unlawful Military Detention in Rwanda WATCH “We Will Force You to Confess” Torture and Unlawful Military Detention in Rwanda Copyright © 2017 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-35294 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, Kinshasa, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org OCTOBER 2017 ISBN: 978-1-6231-35294 “We Will Force You to Confess” Torture and Unlawful Military Detention in Rwanda Map of Military Detention Sites in Rwanda .......................................................................... I Glossary and Explanation of Terms ..................................................................................... II Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 6 To Rwandan Government, Military and Judicial Authorities ....................................................... 6 To Rwanda’s National Commission for Human Rights, Ombudsman, and Parliament ................. 7 To International Donors to Rwanda’s Justice and Security Sectors and Other Foreign Governments ............................................................................................................................ 7 To the UN, the World Bank, and Donors Supporting the DDRRR Program ................................... 8 To the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights ....................................................... 8 To the UN Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture .............................................................. 9 To the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ...................................................... 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 10 I. Background ................................................................................................................ 12 The FDLR ................................................................................................................................ 13 The Rwanda National Congress ............................................................................................... 16 Grenade attacks ..................................................................................................................... 16 History of Violations in Rwandan Military Detention ................................................................ 17 II. Torture and Unlawful Detention in Military Centers ............................................... 19 Kami ....................................................................................................................................... 19 MINADEF (Headquarters of the Ministry of Defence) ............................................................... 26 Mukamira .............................................................................................................................. 29 Rubavu’s “Gendarmerie” ........................................................................................................ 34 Other Detention Centers ......................................................................................................... 38 Detention Conditions .............................................................................................................. 43 III. Arrests and Enforced Disappearances ................................................................... 46 Profile of Former Detainees .................................................................................................... 46 Arrests in Rwanda .................................................................................................................. 46 Arrests in Burundi .................................................................................................................. 49 Arrests in the Democratic Republic of Congo ........................................................................... 50 Arrests and Transfers during Demobilization and Repatriation from Congo .............................. 55 IV. Leaving Military Detention .................................................................................... 61 Release .................................................................................................................................. 61 Into the Regular Justice System .............................................................................................. 62 Visits ..................................................................................................................................... 64 Trials ..................................................................................................................................... 66 Allegations of Torture and Illegal Detention in Court, and Unfair Trials ..................................... 71 Impunity for Perpetrators ........................................................................................................ 74 After Release .......................................................................................................................... 77 V. Government response ........................................................................................... 79 VI. National and International Legal Standards .......................................................... 82 Torture and Forced Confessions ............................................................................................. 82 Safeguards and Procedure for Arrests and Detention .............................................................. 84 Arbitrary and Illegal Detention and Enforced Disappearances ................................................. 86 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ 91 Appendix I: Court Cases.................................................................................................... 92 Appendix II: Letter to Minister of Justice ........................................................................... 99 Appendix III: Letter to the National Commission for Human Rights .................................. 109 Map of Military Detention Sites in Rwanda © 2017 John Emerson for Human Rights Watch I HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | OCTOBER 2017 Glossary and Explanation of Terms African Charter African Charter of Human and Peoples’ Rights. Ratified by Rwanda in 1983. CAT Committee Against Torture. United Nations body which monitors implementation of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by state parties. The CAT reviewed Rwanda in 2012 and will review it again in 2017. CNDP National Congress for the Defence of the People (Congrès national pour la défense du people). A former rebel group in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. DDRRR Disarmament, demobilization, repatriation, reintegration, and resettlement of foreign armed groups. In the context of this report, DDRRR is used to describe the process through which FDLR combatants (see below) are demobilized in Congo, transferred to Rwanda, and reintegrated into civilian life there. The DDRRR program in Congo is coordinated by the UN peacekeeping mission, MONUSCO. DMI Rwanda’s Department of Military Intelligence, officially known as “J2,” responsible for matters concerning military intelligence and security. EACJ East African Court of Justice. Organ of the East African Community, located in Arusha, Tanzania. FAR Rwandan Armed Forces (Forces armées rwandaises), the Rwandan army before and during the 1994 genocide. “Ex-FAR” refers to its former members. FARDC Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Forces armées de la République démocratique du Congo), the Congolese national army. FDLR Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (Forces démocratiques pour la libération du Rwanda). A predominantly Rwandan Hutu armed rebel group, based in eastern Congo, some of whose members and “WE WILL FORCE YOU TO CONFESS” II leaders participated in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. The FDLR has also been responsible for serious human rights abuses in Congo. FDU-Inkingi United Democratic Forces-Inkingi (Forces démocratiques unifiées- Inkingi). A Rwandan opposition party which has been unable to register as a political party. HRC Human Rights Committee. UN body which monitors implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by state parties. The HRC reviewed Rwanda in March 2016. ICC International Criminal Court. Rwanda
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Confession of Judgment New York Blumberg
    Confession Of Judgment New York Blumberg Peaceable and mismated Goober rang her biogeny carry-out or sate comfortingly. Is Chaunce spluttering or antipathetical after acaudal Samuele balkanizes so large? Pledged and self-correcting Yacov never hemorrhaging notably when Stuart serrying his years. La utilidad es identificar las experiencias educativas convergen a community is needed by me from college a confession of judgment new york cls is The new york so on a federal courts of judgments entered as other hand. Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? We need you to install these stories here we remind us. Where their confessions than enough data and judgment debtor who seek revenge on a confession cases and detailed explanations of judgments and facilitating our present. Winning a better oversight, judgment of the total abundance was not my inhibitions with court jurisdiction thereof and environmentally friendly adult. Kason points to employ money morning as privacy act of generosity but bring some sort a payment for sexual favors. He specialized in new york and confess judgment was positively associated with a confession. Remember touching any melodramatic tinge as capable of the florida supreme courts there they want of judgment of confession of us at which tropical marine species. French athletes who were made many of new york city school personnel and blumberg. Further, regulation, this rule not been roundly criticized as primitive just a restatement of the existing duty of complete state either prove the case. IRTHRIGHT OF ITIZENSHIPwhen they were born of aliens whose residence was merely temporary. If these differences are heritable it is likely that ocean acidification will lead to selection against susceptible phenotypes as well as to rapid fixation of alleles that allow reproduction under more acidic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Conflict-Related Detainees in Afghan Custody One Year On” and Changing the Determined Deadline for Presentation of the Response on the Said Report
    Treatment of Conflict-Related Detainees in Afghan Custody One Year On United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights January 2013 Kabul, Afghanistan Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................... i UNAMA’s Mandate ......................................................................................................................................ii Access and Methodology ..........................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1 Map 1: Detention Facilities Visited by UNAMA.............................................................................. 26 Map 2: Detention Facilities where Incidents Occurred .............................................................. 27 Map 3: Detainee Accounts of Treatment in ALP, ANA, ANP and NDS Locations ................ 28 Treatment of Detainees by the National Directorate of Security ........................................... 29 Map 4: Multiple Incidents in NDS Custody in Ten Provinces ................................................... 42 Map 5: Systematic and Sufficiently Credible and Reliable Incidents in NDS Custody ..... 45 Treatment of Detainees by the Afghan National Police and Afghan
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    United Nations CCPR/C/130/D/2451/2014 International Covenant on Distr.: General 11 March 2021 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 2451/2014*, ** Communication submitted by: V.I. (represented by his mother) Alleged victim: The author State party: Kyrgyzstan Date of communication: 4 November 2009 (initial submission) Document references: Decision taken pursuant to rule 92 of the Committee’s rules of procedure, transmitted to the State party on 18 August 2014 (not issued in document form) Date of adoption of Views: 6 November 2020 Subject matter: Torture; arbitrary detention; unfair trial Procedural issue: Exhaustion of domestic remedies Substantive issues: Torture; arbitrary detention; forced confession; presumption of innocence; lack of legal assistance Articles of the Covenant: 7, 9 (2) and 14 (1), (2) and (3) (b) and (g) Articles of the Optional Protocol: 2 and 5 (2) (b) * Adopted by the Committee at its 130th session (12 October–6 November 2020). ** The following members of the Committee participated in the examination of the communication: Tania María Abdo Rocholl,Yadh Ben Achour, Arif Bulkan, Ahmed Amin Fathalla, Furuya Shuichi, Christof Heyns, Bamariam Koita, David H. Moore, Duncan Laki Muhumuza, Photini Pazartzis, Hernán Quezada Cabrera, Vasilka Sancin, José Manuel Santos Pais, Yuval Shany, Hélène Tigroudja, Andreas Zimmermann and Gentian Zyberi. GE.21-03295(E) CCPR/C/130/D/2451/2014 1. The author is V.I., a national of Kyrgyzstan, born in 1972. He claims that the State party has violated his rights under articles 7, 9 (2) and 14 (1), (2), and (3) (b) and (g) of the Covenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematisch Ambtsbericht Over Mensenrechten En Justitie in Rwanda
    Thematisch ambtsbericht over mensenrechten en justitie in Rwanda Datum 18 augustus 2016 Pagina 1 van 67 Thematisch ambtsbericht | augustus 2016 Colofon Plaats Den Haag Opgesteld door Directie Sub-Sahara Afrika (DAF) Pagina 2 van 67 Thematisch ambtsbericht | augustus 2016 Inhoudsopgave Colofon ......................................................................................................2 Inhoudsopgave ............................................................................................3 1 Mensenrechten......................................................................................... 6 1.1 Algemene mensenrechtensituatie....................................................................6 1.2 Mishandeling en foltering.............................................................................11 1.2.1 Wetgeving ................................................................................................11 1.2.2 Foltering door militairen ..............................................................................12 1.2.3 Mishandeling door de politie.........................................................................14 1.2.4 Local Defence Forces ..................................................................................14 1.2.5 Toezicht en hulpverlening ............................................................................15 1.3 Verdwijningen ...........................................................................................16 1.4 Buitengerechtelijke executies en moorden......................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • WATCH February 2019 Foreign News & Perspectives of the Operational Environment
    community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/ Foreign Military Studies Office Volume 9 Issue #2 OEWATCH February 2019 FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EURASIA INDO-PACIFIC 3 Radios in the Russian Ground Forces 21 Chinese Military Launches Largest-Ever Joint Logistics 50 IRGC: Iran Can Extend Ballistic Missile Range 5 Northern Fleet Will Receive Automated C&C System Exercise 51 Turkey to Create Space Agency Integrating Air, Land and Sea 23 Luo Yuan Describes an Asymmetric Approach to Weaken 52 Iran’s Army Aviation Gets UAV Unit 6 The Inflatable Sentry the United States 53 Turkey to Sell ATAK Helicopters to the Philippines 7 The S-350 Vityaz Air Defense System 25 Military-Civil Fusion Cooperation in China Grows in the 54 Chinese Military and Commercial Cooperation with Tunisia 8 Bigger is Better: The T-80BVM Tank Modernization Field of Logistics 10 The Power Struggle for Control of Russia’s Arctic 27 Chinese Military Completes Release of New Set of Military AFRICA 11 The Arctic Will Have Prominent Role in 2019 Operational- Training Regulations 55 Anger in Sudan: Large Protests Against al-Bashir Regime Strategic Exercise “Center” 28 China Defends Xinjiang Program 56 Africa: Trouble Spots to Watch in 2019 12 Preparation for the 2019 Army International Games 29 Is Pakistan Acquiring Russian Tanks? 57 Can Businessmen Bring Peace in Gao, Mali? 13 Cossacks – Hybrid Defense Forces 30 Russia to Deploy Additional Anti-Ship Missile Batteries 58 Chinese Weapons in Rwanda 14 Update on Military Church Construction Near Japan by 2020
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency As Ideology, Ideology As Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-Aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony
    Open Cultural Studies 2018; 2: 654–667 Research Article Jorge I. Valdovinos* Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0059 Received June 15, 2018; accepted November 18, 2018 Abstract: Along with the increasing commodification of all aspects of culture and the persistent aestheticisation of everyday life under late capitalism, there is an equally increasing longing for objectivity, immediacy, and trust. As the mediation of our everyday experiences augments, a generalised feeling of mistrust in institutions reigns; the sense of a need to bypass them increases, and the call for more “transparency” intensifies. As transparency manages to bypass critical examination, the term becomes a source of tacit social consensus. This paper argues that the proliferation of contemporary discourses favouring transparency has become one of the fundamental vehicles for the legitimation of neoliberal hegemony, due to transparency's own conceptual structure—a formula with a particularly sharp capacity for translating structures of power into structures of feeling. While the ideology of transparency promises a movement towards the abolition of unequal flows of information at the basis of relations of power and exploitation, it simultaneously sustains a regime of hyper-visibility based on asymmetrical mechanisms of accountability for the sake of profit. The solution is not “more” transparency or “better” information, but to critically examine the emancipatory
    [Show full text]
  • Torture, Forced Confessions, and Inhuman Punishments: Human Rights Abuses in the Japanese Penal System
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title Torture, Forced Confessions, and Inhuman Punishments: Human Rights Abuses in the Japanese Penal System Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63f7h7tc Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 20(2) Author Vize, Jeff Publication Date 2003 DOI 10.5070/P8202022161 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California TORTURE, FORCED CONFESSIONS, AND INHUMAN PUNISHMENTS: HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES IN THE JAPANESE PENAL SYSTEM Jeff Vize* INTRODUCTION Japan has rarely found itself on the most-wanted lists of human rights activists, and perhaps for good reason. It is the richest and most stable nation in Asia,' and seems to practice none of the flagrantly abusive policies of regional neighbors like China2 or Myanmar. 3 Its massive economy provides a high stan- dard of living. 4 Crime, though rising rapidly in the last ten years, is still minuscule by international standards. In 2000, Japanese authorities reported that there were 1,985 crimes for every 100,000 inhabitants, compared to 4,124 in the United States, and * University of California at Davis, King Hall School of Law, J.D. (2004). The author would like to thank Professor Diane Marie Amann for her helpful advice, comments, and criticism. The author would also like to thank Professor Kojiro Sakamoto, and his wife Chikage, for their advice from a Japanese perspective. 1. JAPAN'S NEW ECONOMY: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY 2-3 (Magnus Blomstrom et al. eds., 2001). See also Statistics Division, United Nations, Indicators on Income and Economic Activity, at http://un- stats.un.org/unsd/demographic/social/inc-eco.htm (last visited July 27, 2003) (listing Japan's per capita gross domestic product for 2001 at $32,540, the fifth highest in the world).
    [Show full text]
  • Maimonides, Miranda, and the Conundrum of Confession: Self- Incrimination in Jewish and American Legal Traditions
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYU\89-5\NYU504.txt unknown Seq: 1 19-NOV-14 15:53 NOTES MAIMONIDES, MIRANDA, AND THE CONUNDRUM OF CONFESSION: SELF- INCRIMINATION IN JEWISH AND AMERICAN LEGAL TRADITIONS BECKY ABRAMS GREENWALD* This Note argues that both Jewish and American law express skepticism about self- incriminating statements based on concerns of reliability, respect for the individual, and the religious belief that confessions can be offered only to God. However, both traditions also recognize that certain circumstances necessitate the use of self- incriminating statements. This Note compares the two traditions to unearth a deep tension within legal and cultural conceptions of self-incrimination and confession. Specifically, the Note proposes that both Jewish and American law reflect con- flicting desires—to simultaneously accept and reject self-incriminating statements. On the one hand, confessions appear to be powerful evidence of guilt, as well as a helpful part of the process of punishing and rehabilitating criminal offenders. On the other hand, confessions uncomfortably turn the accused into his own accuser, raising concerns about whether the confession was the result of unreliable internal self-destructive instincts or external coercion. Future decisions involving self- incriminating statements must be made with an awareness of both the benefits and the hazards of utilizing such statements. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1744 R I. THE IDEAL: REJECTING SELF-INCRIMINATING STATEMENTS ............................................ 1746 R A. Jewish Law ......................................... 1746 R 1. The Unreliability of Confessions and the Psychological Impulses of Confessors ........... 1747 R 2. Critiques Based on Moral Considerations and Respect for the Individual ....................... 1749 R 3. The Spiritual Approach: One Cannot Give What One Does Not Own............................
    [Show full text]
  • B-8-2016-1064 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting B8-1064/2016 4.10.2016 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 135 of the Rules of Procedure on Rwanda, the case of Victoire Ingabire (2016/2910(RSP)) Charles Tannock, Mark Demesmaeker, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Ryszard Czarnecki, Karol Karski, Anna Elżbieta Fotyga, Arne Gericke, Notis Marias, Angel Dzhambazki, Ruža Tomašić, Monica Macovei, Branislav Škripek on behalf of the ECR Group RE\P8_B(2016)1064_EN.docx PE589.653v01-00 EN United in diversity EN B8-1064/2016 European Parliament resolution on Rwanda, the case of Victoire Ingabire (2016/2910(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its resolution of 23 May 2013 on Rwanda: case of Victoire Ingabire, – having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, - having regard to the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, - having regard to the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, - having regard to the instruments of the United Nations and the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, in particular the Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa, - having regard to the UN Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or degrading Treatment or Punishment, - having regard to the Cotonou Agreement, – having regard to Rule 135 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas Victoire Ingabire in 2010, after 16 years in exile in the Netherlands, President of the Unified Democratic Forces (UDF), a coalition of Rwandan opposition parties, returned to Rwanda to run in the presidential election and was barred from standing in this election against the de facto leader of Rwanda since 1994, Paul Kagame; after the elections was arrested on 14 October 2010; B.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and Representation in the Afghan Urban Transition
    Afghanistan’s Constitution Ten Years On: What Are the Issues? Mohammad Hashim Kamali August 2014 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Issues Paper Afghanistan’s Constitution Ten Years On: What Are the Issues? Mohammad Hashim Kamali August 2014 Funding for this research was provided by the United States Institute of Peace and the Embassy of Finland. 2014 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Cover photo: (From top to bottom): A view of the 2004 constitutional Loya Jirga Sessions; people’s representatives gesture during 2004 constitutional Loya Jirga; people’s representatives listening to a speech during 2004 constitutional Loya Jirga; Loya Jirga members during the 2004 Constitutional Loya Jirga, Kabul (by National Archives of Afghanistan). AREU wishes to thank the National Archives of Afghanistan for generously granting access to its photo collection from the 2004 Constitutional Loya Jirga. Layout: Ahmad Sear Alamyar AREU Publication Code: 1416E © 2014 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of AREU. Some rights are reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted only for non- commercial purposes and with written credit to AREU and the author. Where this publication is reproduced, stored or transmitted electronically, a link to AREU’s website (www.areu.org.af) should be provided. Any use of this publication falling outside of these permissions requires prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be sought by emailing [email protected] or by calling +93 (0) 799 608 548.
    [Show full text]
  • L'opposante Victoire Ingabire Libérée De Prison
    A la une / International Rwanda L'opposante Victoire Ingabire libérée de prison Une des principales figures de l'opposition rwandaise, Victoire Ingabire, est sortie de prison, hier, dans le cadre de la libération anticipée de plus de 2 000 prisonniers décidée la veille par le président Paul Kagame qui dirige son pays d'une main de fer depuis près d'un quart de siècle. “Je remercie le Président qui a permis cette libération”, a dit l'opposante alors qu'elle quittait la prison de Mageragere dans la capitale rwandaise, Kigali. “J'espère que cela marque le début de l'ouverture de l'espace politique au Rwanda”, a-t-elle ajouté, appelant M. Kagame à “libérer d'autres prisonniers politiques”. La libération surprise de 2 140 détenus, dont Mme Ingabire et le chanteur Kizito Mihigo, a été décidée lors d'un conseil des ministres, vendredi, au cours duquel une mesure de grâce présidentielle a été approuvée. “Le conseil des ministres présidé par le président Paul Kagame a approuvé, aujourd'hui, la libération anticipée de 2140 condamnés auxquels les dispositions de la loi leur donnaient droit”, a précisé un communiqué du ministère de la Justice. “Parmi eux figurent M. Kizito Mihigo et Mme Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, dont le reste de la peine a été commuée par prérogative présidentielle à la suite de leurs dernières demandes de clémence déposées en juin de cette année”, a ajouté le texte. Mme Ingabire avait été arrêtée en 2010 peu de temps après son retour au Rwanda alors qu'elle voulait se présenter à la présidentielle contre Paul Kagame comme candidate du parti des Forces démocratiques unifiées (FDU- Inkingi), une formation d'opposition non reconnue par les autorités de Kigali.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabo Ligado Monthly: July 2021 July Monthly: Ligado Cabo 16 August 2021 16 August with Insurgents in 22 Recorded Armed Clashes, Resulting in 95 Reported Fatalities
    OBSERVATORY CONFLICT CONFLICT 16 August 2021 Cabo Ligado Monthly: July 2021 Cabo Ligado — or ‘connected cape’ — is a Mozambique conflict observatory launched by ACLED, Zitamar News, and Mediafax. VITAL STATS • ACLED records 38 organized political violence events in July, resulting in 134 fatalities • Events took place in Ibo, Macomia, Mocimboa da Praia, Montepuez, Muidumbe, Nangade, and Palma districts VITAL TRENDS • Rwandan troops arrived in Cabo Delgado in July and quickly entered the fray; they were involved in 10 recorded organized political violence events resulting in 73 reported fatalities • Violence in Mocimboa da Praia district jumped sharply as Rwandan and Mozambican troops undertook an offensive that ultimately resulted in the re-taking of Mocimboa da Praia town in early August • Fighting also continued in Palma district, as Rwandan and Mozambican troops worked to clear the ar- eas around Palma town and the route from Palma to Nangade of insurgents IN THIS REPORT • Analysis of KiSwahili-language Islamic State propaganda streams and their relationship to the Cabo Delgado conflict • Explanation of the origins and functions of pro-government local militias in Cabo Delgado • Examination of the combat record and political position of Rwanda in the Cabo Delgado conflict • Update on international involvement in Cabo Delgado with a focus on how costs and responsibilities will be divided up between SADC member states in the SADC Standby Force mission JULY SITUATION SUMMARY In July 2021, the Cabo Delgado conflict became internationalized to an unprecedented extent. Rwandan troops entered the fray at the Mozambican government’s behest, sending police and military forces to assist the Mozambican counterinsurgency effort.
    [Show full text]