DOCSLIB.ORG

Application Recommended for Approval APP/2013/0344 Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application Recommended for Approval APP/2013/0344 Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward Application Recommended for Approval APP/2013/0344 Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward Removal of Condition no.2 on planning permission APP/2007/0636 to allow the granny annexe to be used as a seperate dwelling 200A BROWNSIDE ROAD WORSTHORNE-WITH-HURSTWOOD Background: Planning permission was granted in 2007 for the erection of an annex to the front of the dwelling at No. 200 Brownside Road. It was put forward at the time that it would be very difficult to attach it to the house because of the internal layout, position of main windows etc. The possibility that there would be pressure for it to be a separate dwelling was considered and a condition was imposed to restrict the building to an annex only, so that a proposal to convert it to a separate house could be reconsidered having regard to residential amenity, car parking, etc. Also at the time of the application for the annex the Borough was in a position of over- supply of housing and further applications for housing were not being granted except in the Intervention Areas. The application is now for the removal of the condition so that the annex can be operated as a single dwelling independent of the house. No objections have been received. Main dwelling Annex Relevant Policies: Burnley Local Plan Second Review GP1 - Development within the Urban Boundary H1 - Land for new housing development H2 - The sequential release of further housing land for development H3 - Quality and design in new housing development H13 – Alterations and extensions to existing dwellings H14 – Gardens and Backland Development Article 31 Statement The application as submitted was in accordance with the local plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework and there was no need for any negotiation with the applicant. Site History: APP/2007/0636 – Proposed creation of granny annexe (resubmission) – granted APP/2006/0393 – Creation of granny annexe – refused Consultation Responses: Lancashire County Council (Highways) - no objections raised. The plan has been satisfactorily amended to show access from the existing drive with turning facility within the site. Would wish to see the front wall rebuilt to prevent casual use of the access. Planning and Environmental Considerations: The main issue is the principle of a new dwelling in this location having regard to the housing land position; its impact on the character of the area; residential amenity and highway safety. The Council is in a position where there is sufficient housing land provision to meet the Borough’s needs for a five year rolling period and there is no need to release additional sites to meet the housing requirement. There is some capacity to allow windfall applications for housing development in suitable locations. In principle, therefore the proposal is acceptable. It is a brownfield site within the Urban Boundary. It is not in a highly accessible position in relation to shops and services but it would make use of the existing infrastructure and has reasonable access to public transport. In terms of the impact on the character of the area, the resultant layout would amount to a form of backland development, with the original house being set back from the road and the annex close to the road. Although it is set back, the main house is visible from the road being positioned at the top of the access drive and there is adequate space around the buildings so that it does not lead to a cramped appearance. It would not result in a detriment impact on the overall appearance and character of the area. There is a window in the dwelling to a main room which would directly face the patio door of a bedroom in the side elevation of the proposed bungalow and the applicant has agreed to obscurely glaze this to avoid any privacy issues. This can be achieved by condition. No other residents would be affected in terms of outlook or privacy. The front wall of the property has been partially demolished to form a gateway to the proposed bungalow, but the Highway Authority were concerned that this would not be a suitable access in this position. The applicant has amended the layout so that access would be gained from the existing drive and a turning area provided to the front of the bungalow. It would be appropriate to require that the front wall was reinstated to prevent it being used for access / egress. This would also help to shield the parking area from the main road frontage. The proposal satisfies the policies of the Local Plan and is acceptable. Recommendation: That the condition preventing the use of the building as a separate dwelling be removed and additional conditions imposed in respect of the glazing of the bedroom window and the reinstatement of the front boundary wall be imposed. Conditions 1. The patio window in northern elevation of the former annexe shall be obscurely glazed before the building is used as a separate dwellinghouse. The obscure glazing shall thereafter remain to the satisfaction of the local planning authority. 2. The opening formed in the front stone wall to Brownside Road, directly in front of the proposed bungalow, shall be closed and the wall rebuilt to its former height, in natural stone which matches the existing stonework in colour, coursing, size and texture before the building is brought into use as a separate dwelling. 3. The parking and turning area indicated on the approved plan, drawing no. BIRD/01A Dwg 04 received 27 August 2013 shall be provided before the building is brought into use as a separate dwelling. Reasons 1. In order to protect the residential amenity of the occupants of the original house and the proposed bungalow having regard to Policy H3 of the Burnley Local Plan Second Review. 2. In the interests of highway safety having regard to Policy H3 of the Burnley Local Plan Second Review. 3. In the interests of highway safety, to ensure the adequate provision for the parking of vehicles and to ensure that they can enter and leave the site in forward gear, having regard to Policy TM15 and H3 of the Burnley Local Plan Second Review. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vebraalto.Com
    18 Mayfair Road Burnley BB10 4HW £130,000 Key Features: • Three Bed Semi Detached • Open Plan Living/ Dining Room Tenure: Leasehold • Pike Hill Area • Driveway For Multiple Cars EPC Rating: • Detached Garage • Highly Sough After Area Council Tax Band: • Close To Cliviger & Worsthorne • Family Home 3 1 1 1 • Front & Back Garden • MUST VIEW PROPERTY! 26 Manchester Road, Burnley, Lancashire, BB11 1HH T: www.pettyreal.co.uk 3 BEDROOM House - Semi-Detached Main Description: Fantastic opportunity to acquire this three-bed semi-detached in the highly sought after area of Pike Hill. Close to local schools, amenities, bus stops, and walks to Worsthorne & Cliviger. This large bay fronted semi provides a great space for a growing family, or individuals who are looking to put their own *Stamp* and design their ideal home. Entering the property via the entrance vestibule you are welcomed into the entrance hall which provides access to the first floor or the open plan living room/ diner which houses a gas fire and the back boiler. The kitchen has matching wall, base, and drawer units in an L shape arrangement with contrasting worktop surfaces. On the first floor, there are two double bedrooms and a single. The family bathroom houses a three-piece suite comprising a low-level WC, hand wash basin, and paneled bath. Externally there is a driveway for multiple cars to the front and side of the property, front and rear gardens with a detached garage. The property shows great potential for an extension or a *Grand Design* makeover. This is a rare opportunity and a viewing is imperative..
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme
    LANCASHIRE HISTORIC TOWN SURVEY PROGRAMME BURNLEY HISTORIC TOWN ASSESSMENT REPORT MAY 2005 Lancashire County Council and Egerton Lea Consultancy with the support of English Heritage and Burnley Borough Council Lancashire Historic Town Survey Burnley The Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme was carried out between 2000 and 2006 by Lancashire County Council and Egerton Lea Consultancy with the support of English Heritage. This document has been prepared by Lesley Mitchell and Suzanne Hartley of the Lancashire County Archaeology Service, and is based on an original report written by Richard Newman and Caron Newman, who undertook the documentary research and field study. The illustrations were prepared and processed by Caron Newman, Lesley Mitchell, Suzanne Hartley, Nik Bruce and Peter Iles. Copyright © Lancashire County Council 2005 Contact: Lancashire County Archaeology Service Environment Directorate Lancashire County Council Guild House Cross Street Preston PR1 8RD Mapping in this volume is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Lancashire County Council Licence No. 100023320 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lancashire County Council would like to acknowledge the advice and assistance provided by Graham Fairclough, Jennie Stopford, Andrew Davison, Roger Thomas, Judith Nelson and Darren Ratcliffe at English Heritage, Paul Mason, John Trippier, and all the staff at Lancashire County Council, in particular Nik Bruce, Jenny Hayward, Jo Clark, Peter Iles, Peter McCrone and Lynda Sutton. Egerton Lea Consultancy Ltd wishes to thank the staff of the Lancashire Record Office, particularly Sue Goodwin, for all their assistance during the course of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 23 November, 1920. 11485
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 23 NOVEMBER, 1920. 11485 menfc Acts, 1888 ,and 1894; the Local Loans veniences connected therewith or incidental Act, 1875; the Lands Clauses Acts; and the thereto, namely: — Arbitration Act, 1889; and all Acts amending A diversion, widening and improvement of those Acts respectively. ELiddrow-lane commencing at the junction Printed copies of the Bill for the intended of that lane with Padiham-road, and ter- Act will be deposited in the Private Bill Office minating by a junction with Lower House- of the House of Commons on or before the 17th lane at a point 133 yards or thereabouts day of December next. measured in a north-westerly direction from Dated this 18th day of November, 1920. the junction of Hordley-street and Lower House-lane. R. SHBRITON HOLMES, Council Offices, In the above description the junction of Gosforth, Clerk to the Council, Soli- any two streets is to be taken as the point at citor for the Bill. which the centre lines of those two streets (if SHAEPE, PJEUTCHATJD AND Co., Parlia- necessary continued) intersect each other. ment-mansions. Orchard-street, Vic- 2. To empower the Corporation to make and toria-street, Westminster, S.W. 1. 2 maintain the reservoir hereinafter described in 39 Parliamentary Agents. the parish of Worsthorne-with-Hurstwood, ic the rural district of Burnley, in the county In Parliament.—Session 1921. Palatine of Lancaster, together with all neces- BURNLEY CORPORATION. sary and proper pipes, conduits, culverts, (Construction of New Street or Improvement drains, sluices, channels,
    [Show full text]
  • Worsthorne Conservation Area Appraisal February 2018
    Worsthorne Conservation Area Appraisal Burnley Borough Council Published February 2018 1 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 What is a Conservation Area? .............................................................................................. 3 What is a Conservation Area Appraisal? .............................................................................. 3 How will the Conservation Area Appraisal be used?............................................................ 4 Consultation on the Conservation Area Appraisal ............................................................... 4 History of Designation .......................................................................................................... 4 Planning Policy Context ........................................................................................................ 5 2. Summary of Special Interest ................................................................................................. 6 3. General Character Appraisal ................................................................................................. 7 Location and Landscape Setting ........................................................................................... 7 Historic Development and Archaeology ............................................................................... 8 General Character, Layout and Form ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 14 0023 Hillside House.Pdf
    Application Recommended for Approval APP/2014/0023 Cliviger with Worsthorne Ward Full Planning Application Proposed erection of detached bungalow in garden HILLSIDE HOUSE MERECLOUGH CLIVIGER BURNLEY Background: It is proposed to build a detached bungalow in the garden area of Hillside House, between Nos 30 and 34 School Lane. Access to the new property would be from School Lane, via an existing access to Hillside House. Hillside House would then use an existing access from Long Causeway. No. 30 Hillside House No. 34 (No. 32) View of land from School Lane frontage Hillside House (No. 32) Existing access for Hillside House No. 34 No. 30 Existing access to serve new bungalow An objection has been received. Relevant Policies: Burnley Local Plan Second Review GP2 - Development in the Rural Areas H1 - Land for new housing development H2 - he sequential release of further housing land for development H3 - Quality and design in new housing development TM15 - Car parking standards Consultation Responses: 1 Lancashire County Council (Highways) – No objections are raised to the proposal on highway grounds 2 Burnley Civic Trust – do not consider that this development is appropriate. The location is outside the urban boundary and the Greencliffe Lane properties are spaced out, the new development is not on the footprint of an existing building. The location is on the skyline looking up from Mereclough and it is not considered that the development would fit in with the character of the area. Planning and Environmental Considerations: The site is outside the Urban Boundary within the Rural Area where Policy GP2 restricts development to that appropriate to the rural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley Borough Council Housing & Development Control Town
    Burnley Borough Council Housing & Development Control Town Hall, Manchester Road Burnley, Lancashire BB11 9SA Tel 01282 425011 Email [email protected] Worsthorne With Hurstwood PC Planning Date: 29th July 2021 Committee Ref No: HOU/2021/0455 3 Townfield Avenue Contact: Lesley Blakey Worsthorne Telephone: 3293 Burnley BB10 3JG Dear Sir/Madam Town and Country Planning Act 1990 APPLICATION: HOU/2021/0455 PROPOSAL: Erection of a single storey pitched roof rear extension AT: 29 Inchfield, Worsthorne-with-hurstwood, Lancashire The Council has received an application which may interest your group. You now have a chance to look at the plans and comment on the planning merits. Plans, forms etc. are now available to view using the planning application search facility on the website at www.burnley.gov.uk/planning where you can also submit your comments. If you are unable to gain access to the internet the application can be viewed by appointment with the Case Officer named above. If you do wish to comment please use the online form or write to me either by e-mail or letter quoting application number before 19th August 2021. It may not be possible to take into account your comments after that date. If you are commenting by e- mail please give details of your name and address. If you do write I will take into account the planning merits of what you say. The Council makes most replies available for inspection by the general public, the press and the applicant, and copies may be made available. When a decision has been made it will be available to view on the Council’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotton and the Community: Exploring Changing Concepts of Identity and Community on Lancashire’S Cotton Frontier C.1890-1950
    Cotton and the Community: Exploring Changing Concepts of Identity and Community on Lancashire’s Cotton Frontier c.1890-1950 By Jack Southern A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for the degree of a PhD, at the University of Central Lancashire April 2016 1 i University of Central Lancashire STUDENT DECLARATION FORM I declare that whilst being registered as a candidate of the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another aware of the University or other academic or professional institution. I declare that no material contained in this thesis has been used for any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work. Signature of Candidate ________________________________________________ Type of Award: Doctor of Philosophy School: Education and Social Sciences ii ABSTRACT This thesis explores the evolution of identity and community within north east Lancashire during a period when the area gained regional and national prominence through its involvement in the cotton industry. It examines how the overarching shared culture of the area could evolve under altering economic conditions, and how expressions of identity fluctuated through the cotton industry’s peak and decline. In effect, it explores how local populations could shape and be shaped by the cotton industry. By focusing on a compact area with diverse settlements, this thesis contributes to the wider understanding of what it was to live in an area dominated by a single industry. The complex legacy that the cotton industry’s decline has had is explored through a range of settlement types, from large town to small village.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley District Flood Report
    Burnley District Flood Report Recommended Actions February 2017 Lancashire County Council - District Flood Report Contents Report section and type Page No. 1. Background 3 2. Key Definitions 3 The Risk Management Authorities 3 The Risk Management Functions 4 Riparian Landowners 4 Interconnections between responsibilities 4 3 Key Functions of the Risk Management Authorities 5 The Environment Agency 5 Lancashire County Council 6 City and Borough Councils 6 Internal Drainage Boards 7 Water Companies 7 Civil Contingencies Responsibilities 7 4. Recommended Actions 8 County-wide Actions 8 District-wide Actions 11 Community Actions 12 5 Useful Links 27 2 | P a g e Lancashire County Council - District Flood Report 1. Background: As a Lead Local Flood Authority, Lancashire County Council has a role in coordinating flood risk activities and ensuring the free flow of communication and collaborative works. In order to help achieve this, Lancashire County Council and relevant risk management authorities meet regularly to discuss local flooding issues and to identify opportunities for managing future flood risks. This has worked very well up to now and has allowed risk management authorities to work closely together to tackle often complex and challenging situations. However following the significant flooding that hit Lancashire in December 2015, it became evident that improvements could be made to the way in which these messages get communicated to affected communities. As such, Lancashire County Council has now developed a series of district level reports which aim to provide affected communities with information about what relevant risk management authorities are doing in their areas to help manage the risk of flooding from a variety of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Zone Map in a New
    Crosby Garrett Kirkby Stephen Orion Smardale Grasmere Raisbeck Nateby Sadgill Ambleside Tebay Kelleth Kentmere Ravenstonedale Skelwith Bridge Troutbeck Outhgill Windermere Selside Zone 1 M6 Hawkshead Aisgill Grayrigg Bowness-on-Windermere Bowston Lowgill Monday/Tuesday Near Sawrey Burneside Mitchelland Crook Firbank 2 Kendal Lunds Killington Sedburgh Garsdale Head Zone 2 Lake Crosthwaite Bowland Oxenholme Garsdale Brigsteer Wednesday Bridge Killington Broughton-in-Furness 1 Rusland Old Hutton Cartmel Fell Lakeside Dent Cowgill Lowick Newby Bridge Whitbarrow National Levens M6 Middleton Stone House Nature Reserve Foxfield Bouth Zone 3 A595 Backbarrow A5092 The Green Deepdale Crooklands Heversham Penny Bridge A590 High Newton A590 Mansergh Barbon Wednesday/Thursday Kirkby-in-Furness Milnthorpe Meathop A65 Kirksanton Lindale Storth Gearstones Millom Kirkby Lonsdale Holme A595 Ulverston Hutton Roof Zone 4 Haverigg Grange-over-Sands Askam-in-Furness Chapel-le-Dale High Birkwith Swarthmoor Arnside & Burton-in-Kendal Leck Cark Silverdale AONB Yealand Whittington Flookburgh A65 Thursday A590 Redmayne Ingleborough National Bardsea Nature Reserve New Houses Dalton-in-Furness M6 Tunstall Ingleton A687 A590 Warton Horton in Kettlewell Arkholme Amcliffe Scales Capernwray Ribblesdale North Walney National Zone 5 Nature Reserve A65 Hawkswick Carnforth Gressingham Helwith Bridge Barrow-in-Furness Bentham Clapham Hornby Austwick Tuesday Bolton-le-Sands Kilnsey A683 Wray Feizor Malham Moor Stainforth Conistone Claughton Keasden Rampside Slyne Zone 6 Morecambe
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Brownside Road, Worsthorne
    Land at Brownside Road, Worsthorne Appeal by Seddon Homes Ltd and H&F Eccles and Son PINS Reference: APP/Z2315/ W/17/3173214 Planning Hearing Statement Land at Brownside Road, Worsthorne Appeal by Seddon Homes Ltd and H&F Eccles and Son PINS Reference: APP/Z2315/W/17/3173214 August 2017 Indigo St James’ Tower 7 Charlotte Street Manchester, M1 4DZ T 0161 836 6910 E [email protected] W indigoplanning.com Land at Brownside Road, Worsthorne Appeal by Seddon Homes Ltd and H&F Eccles and Son PINS Reference: APP/Z2315/W/17/3173214 Contents Page 1. Qualifications 1 2. Introduction 2 3. Site and Proposed Development 4 4. The Development Plan 7 5. National Planning Policy Framework 12 6. Sustainability 14 7. Development Benefits 17 8. Planning Justification 20 9. S106 Contributions / Unilateral Undertaking 30 10. The Planning Balance 31 Land at Brownside Road, Worsthorne Appeal by Seddon Homes Ltd and H&F Eccles and Son PINS Reference: APP/Z2315/W/17/3173214 Appendices Appendix 1 Supreme Court Judgement (Suffolk Costal District Council (Appellant) v Hopkins Homes Ltd and another (Respondents) Richborough Estates Partnership LLP and another (Respondents) v Cheshire East Borough Council (Appellant) Appendix 2 Worsthorne-with-Hurstwood Parish Council Neighbourhood Plan Area Application Letter Appendix 3 Viewpoint Story Boards Page 1 1. Qualifications 1.1. My name is Doug Hann and I am a main board Director at Indigo Planning Limited, and head of its Manchester office. I hold a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Geography, a Masters in Town Planning and a Masters in Business Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Magazine October & November, 2020
    Parish Magazine October & November, 2020 Parish Church of St. Matthew the Apostle with Holy Trinity, Habergham Eaves, Burnley WEEKLY SERVICES AT ST. MATTHEW’S Provided there are no further lockdowns, etc. ONE SUNDAY SERVICE: 10.30am PARISH EUCHARIST EXCEPT on the FIRST SUNDAY of the month when we hope to have THREE SERVICES 8.30 * Modern Language Eucharist, St. Paul’s Chapel * earlier time, to allow cleaning between services 10.30 Family Service & Uniformed Organisations’ Parade - a short (about 45-minute) Service aimed at helping younger members of our church to get involved and worship. But everyone is welcome! and 6.30pm Evensong MID-WEEK SERVICES Tuesdays 10.30am Said Eucharist St. Paul’s Chapel Thursdays 7.00pm Said Eucharist High Altar (we are not able to reintroduce a Friday Eucharist at this time) We look forward to seeing you! FROM THE VICAR Hello Everyone, Well goodness me, at the time of writing this for the magazine the future remains uncertain and as clear a mud. The good news of course is that at present church worship is unaffected and long may that continue. Spiritual wellbeing is essential as it helps to keep things in perspective and maintain a sensible and considered response to this dreadful virus that doesn’t want to go away. Church life at the moment is a real roller coaster of emotions and full of ups and downs as we approach the colder months. On the positive side of things, Mother Enid is now recovering from a successful operation and values your continued prayers, Rev Kat is about to be priested (finally) and although Covid restrictions make these big occasions tricky I prayerfully hope it still proves to be a wonderful occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley Task Force Report
    BURNLEY TASK FORCE Page No CONTENTS 1-3 LISTEN TO US 4 PREFACE 5-6 CHAIR’S INTRODUCTION 7-9 TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLAN 10-23 MAPS OF BURNLEY 24-26 SECTION 1 1.1 The origins of the Task Force, its 27-30 Membership and Terms of Reference 1.2 The First Meeting 30-31 1.3 The Consultation Process 31-34 SECTION 2 2.1. What Happened? 35-36 2.2. Why Did it Happen? 36-37 SECTION 3 3.1. Submissions and Task Force Responses 38-39 3.2. Housing 39-47 3.2.1. Ways Forward 3.2.2. Housing Market Renewal Fund 3.2.3. Partnership Management 3.2.4. The Borough’s Approach 3.2.5. Information from other Local Authorities 3.2.6. Private Landlords Page 1 of 87 3.2.7. Housing and Landlords Associations 3.3. Community Relations 4753 3.3.1. Funding of Race Relations Work 3.3.2. The Politicisation of Race 3.3.3. The Asian Heritage Communities 3.3.4. The White Community 3.4. Community and Voluntary Sector 54-57 3.5. Burnley Borough Council 58-62 3.5.1. Council’s Submission 3.6. Police 63-65 3.7. Summary of Newspaper Media Analysis 65-67 3.8. Education 67-68 3.9. Young People 68-77 3.9.1. How the Young People’s Group Operated 3.9.2. How the views of Young People were Obtained 3.9.3. Young People’s Questionnaire 3.9.4. Web Page and ROBOT 3.9.5.
    [Show full text]