DOCSLIB.ORG

Sign Here to Caucus 2004 2004 WINNER: WINNER: Caucus Goers Sign in to Vote in the 2008 Iowa Caucus in the Cafeteria at Davenport West High School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sign Here to Caucus 2004 2004 WINNER: WINNER: Caucus Goers Sign in to Vote in the 2008 Iowa Caucus in the Cafeteria at Davenport West High School IOWA CAUCUS QUAD-CITY TIMES ● XXXXXDAY, DECEMBER XX, 2011 ● XX HOW TO CAUCUS First-in-the-nation means that the eyes of this nation, and even some others, CANDIDATE VISITS TO IOWA SINCE 2008 will be on Iowa Jan. 3 as the first official voting of the 2012 presidential campaign season takes place. 30 visits 27 visits Republicans will have the opportunity to vote at precinct caucuses around the state from a slate of presidential candidates. Candidates include Rep. Michele 83 Days in Iowa 37 Days in Iowa Bachmann, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Utah Gov.Jon Hunts- Santorum Paul man, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, Texas Gov.Rick Perry,former Massachusetts Gov.Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum. Former candidate Herman 29 visits 10 visits Cain also is on the ballot, but he has suspended his campaign. The winner in Iowa doesn’t always end up with the party’s nomination.Four years 46 Days in Iowa 18 Days in Iowa ago,Republican voters gave Mike Huckabee the victory in Iowa,but he couldn’t over- Gingrich Perry come John McCain in other states.Rather,the Iowa caucuses often serve to narrow the field; generally,political observers say three people can punch a ticket out of the state 28 visits 9 visits and remain competition in New Hampshire’s primary and beyond. On the Democratic side this year, there’s no suspense. President Barack Obama 60 Days in Iowa 12 Days in Iowa will be the nominee, but some Democratic caucus-goers will get a chance to hear Bachmann Romney from their candidate, who will be calling in and appearing via video-conference. Source: Democracy in Action, visits through Wednesday. HOW IT WORKS Republicans ■ Caucuses start at 7 p.m. Because it is already 8 p.m. on the East Coast, party leaders have opted to conduct the presidential prefer- ence polling early in the caucuses to accommodate the national radio and TV networks, which are trying to get results on the air during primetime. ■ Activists at each meeting elect a leader, then backers of each candidate deliver speeches on their behalf. ■ Presidential preference selection on the Republican side is done with a straw vote of those attending the caucuses. ■ After the results are sent to a central reporting system, people turn to party business, such as beginning to write a party platform, electing precinct officers and picking delegates to county conven- tions in March. ■ For information, go to the Iowa Republican Party website at iowagop.org.You can also download an app for your iPhone or android-based smart phone. Democrats ■ The Democratic caucus process is more complicated, but because President Barack Obama faces no opposition, there will be less attention paid to the presidential selection process. Democrats still will hold caucuses across the state as an orga- nizing effort to get ready for the 2012 general election. Registra- tion begins at 6:30 p.m., and the caucuses begin at 7 p.m. Obama is scheduled to talk with caucus-goers via video-confer- encing and calls to selected sites on caucus nights. Details of that have not yet been released. ■ For information, go to the Iowa Democratic Party website at iowademocrats.org and click on “The Caucuses.” IOWA CAUCUS WINNERS/PARTY NOMINEES Caucus winner is pictured REPUBLICANS DEMOCRATS 2008 2008 WINNER: WINNER: Mike Huckabee Barack Obama John Schultz /QUAD-CITY TIMES NOMINEE: NOMINEE: John McCain Obama Sign here to caucus 2004 2004 WINNER: WINNER: Caucus goers sign in to vote in the 2008 Iowa caucus in the cafeteria at Davenport West High School. George W. Bush John Kerry (unopposed) NOMINEE: Kerry 2000 2000 QUESTIONS ANSWERED WINNER: WINNER: Al Gore George W. Bush NOMINEE: Gore Q: What is a caucus? Q: Who runs the caucuses? Q: Do you have to be registered NOMINEE: Bush A: The word caucus is a North Amer- A: The caucuses are run by the par- as a Democrat or a Republican? ican Indian word, thought to be of ties, not state election officials. What about independents? 1996 1996 Algonquin origin, meaning a gather- Q: Where do you go? A: Voters can show up and register or WINNER: WINNER: ing of the ruling tribal chiefs. The A: To find your caucus location, switch party registration at the cau- Bob Dole Bill Clinton (unopposed) modern definition describes cau- check your voter registration card for cus site. You must register Democrat NOMINEE: Dole cuses as a process of political party your voting precinct and call the Iowa to participate in the Democratic cau- members gathering to make policy cus and Republican to go to the GOP Democratic Party at 515-244-7292 or decisions and to select candidates. caucus. To register at the Republican 1992 1992 go to www.iowademocrats.org or the WINNER: George WINNER: sites, you need a valid photo ID. Q: How did the caucuses begin? Republican Party of Iowa at 515-282- H.W. Bush Tom Harkin A: Some form of caucus has existed 8105 or go to www.iowagop.org. The Q: Is there any penalty for (unopposed) NOMINEE: since the early 1800s, even before 1,784 precinct caucuses statewide are sneaking into a caucus? NOMINEE: Bush Bill Clinton Iowa became a state in 1846. Devel- A: If a caucus-goer is found to have held in church basements, fire sta- 1988 1988 oping from the congressional and tions, schools and libraries. lied about identity or residency,that WINNER: WINNER: legislative caucuses, the pioneers of person can be fined up to $7,500, but Q: How did the Iowa caucus gain Bob Dole Dick Gephardt the Iowa Constitution chose cau- that rarely happens. its first-in-the nation status? NOMINEE: NOMINEE: cuses rather than a primary election George H.W. A: In the early 1970s, the Iowa Q: How do you vote in the cau- Michael Dukakis to nominate candidates, preferring Bush Democratic Party made several cuses? the grassroots democracy-in-action A: Unlike what most Americans are 1984 1984 approach. reforms to their delegate selection process. These reforms included accustomed to, there’s no voting WINNER: WINNER: Q: When are the caucuses? booth in the very public process. The Ronald Reagan Walter Mondale requiring a minimum of 30 days (unopposed) A: Democrats and Republicans will between the precinct caucuses and methods differ between the Democ- NOMINEE: gather Tuesday,Jan. 3, at precincts the county,district and state conven- rats and Republicans. NOMINEE: Reagan Mondale across Iowa to choose presidential tions, and publicizing the events to Q: How many people are 1980 1980 candidates and discuss party issues. allow more people to take part in the expected to participate in the WINNER: George WINNER: Both parties begin their caucuses at 7 process. When the 1972 Democratic Iowa caucuses? H.W. Bush Jimmy Carter p.m. The parties actually hold cau- State Convention was set for May 20, NOMINEE: Ronald NOMINEE: Carter A: There are 613,521 registered Reagan cuses every two years, but usually get the new rules dictated that the Republicans and 645,475 registered attention, a lot of it, only during precinct caucus would be Jan. 24, Democrats in the state; total voter 1976 1976 presidential years. thereby making it the first statewide registration is 2,111,548. The parties WINNERS: WINNER: Q: Who can participate? test for presidential candidates in the don’t predict turnout, but in 2008, Gerald Ford Jimmy Carter* A: Any voter who is a registered nation. In 1976, recognizing the 239,000 Democrats took part, and NOMINEE: NOMINEE: Carter Ford Republican or Democrat, and can increased exposure, the Republican 120,000 Republicans caucused. It prove residency in Iowa, can partici- Party of Iowa moved its caucus to the was a big year for caucus turnout. In 1972 pate in the caucus of their party. same date as the Democrats. The 2004, 124,000 Democrats took NOTE: Iowa GOP caucuses WINNER: Edmund Those who will be 18 years old in time candidates and national media have part, and 87,000 Republicans cau- weren’t on same date in 1972. Muskie* for the general election in November observed the Iowa caucuses as the cused in 2000 in a contested GOP *Uncommitted received the NOMINEE: George also can participate. “First in the Nation” ever since. event. highest amount of votes. McGovern Page design by Nate Bloomquist, Quad-City Times.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide
    Iowa Democratic Party 2016 Precinct Caucus Guide The following is a step-by-step guide for caucus night. An additional guide will be printed for caucus chairs, which will provide a further in-depth discussion of all procedures and reporting of caucus activities. If you have questions concerning the procedures contained in this caucus guide, please contact the Iowa Democratic Party at 515-244-7292. Paid for by the Iowa Democratic Party www.iowademocrats.org and not authorized by any federal candidate or candidate’s committee . Produced in-house Monday, February 1, 2016 – 7:00PM Doors open 6:30PM Who Can Participate in the Caucuses? In order to participate in the Iowa Democratic Party’s First-in-the-Nation Caucuses, you must meet the following qualifications: • Be a resident of Iowa and of the precinct in which you wish to participate • Be a U.S. citizen and otherwise eligible voter (18 years old by November 8, 2016) • Register as a Democrat* (you can register at the caucus) • Be in the registration line or signed in by 7:00pm Those who do not meet the above qualifications are allowed to remain at the caucus as an observer. *Iowans who will be 18 years old by Election Day, November 8, 2016, can participate in the caucuses; however, one cannot register to vote in Iowa until he/she is at least 17 ½ years old. Because the caucuses are held February 1, 2016, it is possible an eligible 2016 voter won’t be able to register as a Democrat by February 1, in which case the eligible voter must declare himself/herself a Democrat by signing a form with the Iowa Democratic Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's
    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Poll Report with Crosstabs
    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Thursday, January 28, 2016 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick IOWA: CLINTON CLINGS TO CAUCUS LEAD But Sanders makes gains among most voting blocs West Long Branch, NJ – Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders by 5 points in the latest Monmouth University Poll of likely Iowa Democratic caucusgoers, which is down from 22 points just one month ago. High turnout could make this race even tighter. Hillary Clinton currently garners the support of 47% of likely Democratic caucusgoers compared to 42% for Bernie Sanders. Clinton’s lead has shrunk from the 55% to 33% advantage she held in December. Martin O’Malley clocks in at 6% of the vote, which is unchanged from a month ago. Another 6% are uncommitted or undecided. Clinton enjoys a lead over Sanders among female voters by 50% to 38%, but that is not as large as her 61% to 27% advantage last month. The two are basically tied among men – 46% for Sanders and 43% for Clinton. Last month, Clinton had a slight 47% to 42% edge among men. Clinton leads Sanders by 54% to 34% among voters age 50 and older, which is slightly weaker than her 63% to 26% lead in December. Sanders continues to hold the advantage among voters under 50 by a 59% to 31% margin, which is wider than his 48% to 38% lead last month.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact-Checking Carrie Giddins & the New York Times
    FACT-CHECKING CARRIE GIDDINS & THE NEW YORK TIMES The following editorial by former Iowa Democratic Party Communications Director Carrie Giddins appeared Comment [M1]: This is completely in the New York Times today with numerous falsehoods and distortions. Ms. Giddins was not involved in any false. Even before the GOP Legislature and Governor moved the primary up, the discussions between the Florida Democratic Party and the DNC and has no firsthand knowledge of this FDP enlisted experts on alternative situation, which emerged more than a year ago. processes and conducted extensive research. We proposed a vote-by-mail primary to be held after Feb. 5. Tina Flournoy and other DNC RBC members tried to help us find funding, but “Rules Count” unfortunately, we could not find anyone By CARRIE GIDDINS, New York Times interested in paying for a later primary Comment [M2]: This situation was by no means self-inflicted. Republicans IN life, in love and in politics, when you break the rules there are inevitable and often deserved consequences. control the Florida House 77-43, the Senate 26-14, and the Governor’s office. There was (and remains) no way for the Last year, the Democratic National Committee tried to work with the Florida Democratic Party after the Florida FDP to change the law. We also proposed Legislature selected a date for the state’s primary that conflicted with the committee’s nominating calendar. an alternative plan – the only one that was possible – but it did not receive the Those efforts were met with silence and stonewalling from Florida’s party leaders despite the penalties.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President
    Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 This report was researched and writen during the 2019-2020 academic year by students in Fordham Law School’s Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic, where students developed non-partsan recommendatons to strengthen the naton’s insttutons and its democracy. The clinic was supervised by Professor and Dean Emeritus John D. Feerick and Visitng Clinical Professor John Rogan. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the individuals who generously took tme to share their general views and knowledge with us: Robert Bauer, Esq., Professor Monika McDermot, Thomas J. Schwarz, Esq., Representatve Thomas Suozzi, and Jesse Wegman, Esq. This report greatly benefted from Gail McDonald’s research guidance and Flora Donovan’s editng assistance. Judith Rew and Robert Yasharian designed the report. Table of Contents Executve Summary .....................................................................................................................................1 Introducton .....................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama's Strategy to Win the 2008 Democratic Nomination for President
    Barackin’ The Vote: Barack Obama’s Strategy to Win The 2008 Democratic Nomination for President By: Daniel H. Greeley GOVT 315.001 – Elections & Voting Behavior Capstone Advisor: Professor Candice Nelson Table of Contents Section Page Number Introduction 1 Overall Strategy 2 Message 9 Fundraising 16 State-by-State Tactics 20 Conclusion 28 Works Cited 30 Appendix I: Table 1 – Obama Campaign State-by-State Expenditure Totals 34 Appendix II: Chart 1 – Obama Campaign Expenditures by State Over Time 35 Appendix III: Chart 2 – Obama Campaign Expenditures by Type 36 Appendix IV: Charts 3-11 – Obama Campaign Expenditures Per Quarter For Key States 38 Greeley 1 Introduction: While most people think that the goal of a presidential campaign is to win the election, this is not always the case. Some candidates mount a presidential campaign to raise awareness about an issue, such as Senator Tom Tancredo on immigration reform. Others want to make one of the frontrunner candidates address a specific issue. And, other candidates might want to garner name recognition and fundraising prowess to strengthen their chances of winning re- election to their current office. Finally, some candidates, like George H.W. Bush in 1980, enter the race to showcase their political strengths in the hopes that they might be able to join their party’s ticket or administration if their party wins in the general election. Senator Barack Obama from Illinois, who is an African-American, is running in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. Even four years ago, if someone had said an African-American was running for president, the conventional wisdom in the political establishment would probably have been that the candidate was running to raise awareness about race issues or to make the other candidates at least acknowledge these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Review Report for the Iowa Democratic Party 2020 Iowa Caucuses
    INTERNAL REVIEW REPORT FOR THE IOWA DEMOCRATIC PARTY 2020 IOWA CAUCUSES November 10, 2020 Nick Klinefeldt David Yoshimura & Bonnie Campbell Campbell Law Firm TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Engagement ........................................................................................................................................ 1 B. Process ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. History of the Iowa Caucuses .............................................................................................................. 1 B. How the Iowa Democratic Caucuses Work.......................................................................................... 2 Findings of Fact ................................................................................................................................................. 3 A. The IDP Delegate Selection Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 1. Unity Reform Commission Report ................................................................................................. 3 2. DNC Delegate Selection
    [Show full text]
  • <Em>La Follette</Em>'S Folly: a Critique of Party Associational
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 42 2008 La Follette's Folly: A Critique of Party Associational Rights in Presidential Nomination Politics Alan Martinson University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Law and Politics Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Alan Martinson, La Follette's Folly: A Critique of Party Associational Rights in Presidential Nomination Politics, 42 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 185 (2008). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol42/iss1/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LA FOLLE7TE'S FOLLY: A CRITIQUE OF PARTY ASSOCIATIONAL RIGHTS IN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION POLITICS Alan Martinson* Every four years, observers of the presidential nomination season decry the undue influence of those states that hold theirprimaries first, particularlyIowa and New Hampshire. Currently, Democratic Party rules protect the position of these states. In 2008, two states disregardedparty rules in order to move their primaries to a more influentialposition in the primary season. As punishmentfor disobeying the rules, the national party diluted the influence of the delegates from these states at the national convention. Legislative solutions to the problems of the current nomi- nation process appear unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Indiana
    Politics Indiana V14 N19 Thursday, Dec. 20, 2007 We grew up as a city with Julia Carson Congresswoman helped Rep. Carson wept during break down political this cere- mony where barriers in a racist city civil rights pioneer Rosa By BRIAN A. HOWEY Parks was INDIANAPOLIS - In a political honored with sense, Julia Carson’s greatest legacy is the Con- that she established new mileposts for gressional Indiana’s capital city. From a diversity Gold Medal. standpoint, Indianapolis matured with Carson died the congresswoman. on Dec. 15 of When she attended Crispus lung cancer. Attucks High School, the basketball (C-Span team led by Oscar Robertson couldn’t Photo) even play kids from local white high schools. They had to go to places like Smithville. There were many estab- lishments from restaurants to clubs she intended to run for Congress that wouldn’t serve a black man or woman. Like much of when Andy Jacobs Jr. decided to retire in 1996. Some Indiana, Jim Crow could easily find an address in the North. in the Democratic Party establishment told her the seat While black politicians could find their way to the city coun- was unattainable. Former state chairwoman Ann DeLaney cil and the legislature, the big plums - mayor, Member of was supposed to be the establishment choice. But it was Congress, U.S. Senator, governor - seemed distant. Carson who consolidated the support of the Marion County That all began to change with Carson announcing See Page 3 Submerged fiscal bombs By MORTON J. MARCUS INDIANAPOLIS - The Indiana Department of Local Government Finance (DLGF) issued a “Citizens’ Guide to Property Taxes” on November 20th this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama at a Glance
    ALABAMA ALABAMA AT A GLANCE ****************************** PRESIDENTIAL ****************************** Date Primaries: Tuesday, June 1 Polls Open/Close Must be open at least from 10am(ET) to 8pm (ET). Polls may open earlier or close later depending on local jurisdiction. Delegates/Method Republican Democratic 48: 27 at-large; 21 by CD Pledged: 54: 19 at-large; 35 by CD. Unpledged: 8: including 5 DNC members, and 2 members of Congress. Total: 62 Who Can Vote Open. Any voter can participate in either primary. Registered Voters 2,356,423 as of 11/02, no party registration ******************************* PAST RESULTS ****************************** Democratic Primary Gore 214,541 77%, LaRouche 15,465 6% Other 48,521 17% June 6, 2000 Turnout 278,527 Republican Primary Bush 171,077 84%, Keyes 23,394 12% Uncommitted 8,608 4% June 6, 2000 Turnout 203,079 Gen Election 2000 Bush 941,173 57%, Gore 692,611 41% Nader 18,323 1% Other 14,165, Turnout 1,666,272 Republican Primary Dole 160,097 76%, Buchanan 33,409 16%, Keyes 7,354 3%, June 4, 1996 Other 11,073 5%, Turnout 211,933 Gen Election 1996 Dole 769,044 50.1%, Clinton 662,165 43.2%, Perot 92,149 6.0%, Other 10,991, Turnout 1,534,349 1 ALABAMA ********************** CBS NEWS EXIT POLL RESULTS *********************** 6/2/92 Dem Prim Brown Clinton Uncm Total 7% 68 20 Male (49%) 9% 66 21 Female (51%) 6% 70 20 Lib (27%) 9% 76 13 Mod (48%) 7% 70 20 Cons (26%) 4% 56 31 18-29 (13%) 10% 70 16 30-44 (29%) 10% 61 24 45-59 (29%) 6% 69 21 60+ (30%) 4% 74 19 White (76%) 7% 63 24 Black (23%) 5% 86 8 Union (26%)
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Caucus Results
    ELECTIONS 377 CAUCUS RESULTS Democrats Note: Delegate strength figures are projections by the Iowa Democratic Party of the percentage of state convention delegates each candidate controlled as a result of strength shown at the caucuses. In 1972 and 1976, the Iowa Democratic Party also projected the national delegates won based on the strength shown at the caucuses. In 1984 and 1988, the News Election Service (N.E.S.) also conducted straw polls. Since both the Iowa Democratic Party and N.E.S. results depend on volunteer reporting, the results are never complete. In 1992, a N.E.S. straw poll was not conducted. In all years, information was never reported from some precincts. 1972 Delegate Strength National Delegates Won Uncommitted ......................................................... 35.8% ................................................................18 Edmund Muskie .................................................... 35.5% ................................................................18 George McGovern ................................................ 22.6% ................................................................10 Others .................................................................... ....7%.............................................................. .0 Hubert Humphrey ................................................ 1.6% ..................................................................0 Eugene McCarthy ................................................ 1.4% ...................................................................0
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2021 Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Daisy De Wolff Fordham University School of Law Ben Kremnitzer Fordham University School of Law Samara Perlman Fordham University School of Law Gabriella Weick Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Daisy De Wolff, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, and Gabriella Weick, Selecting Representative and Qualified Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries, January (2021) Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/1114 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 Selecting Representative and Qualifed Candidates for President: Proposals to Reform Presidential Primaries Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic Fordham University School of Law Daisy de Wolf, Ben Kremnitzer, Samara Perlman, & Gabriella Weick January 2021 This report was researched and writen during the 2019-2020 academic year by students in Fordham Law School’s Democracy and the Consttuton Clinic, where students developed non-partsan recommendatons to strengthen the naton’s insttutons and its democracy.
    [Show full text]