DOCSLIB.ORG

Susquehanna Flats Chesapeake Bay Havre De Grace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CB1TF (Hectares) 6000 5000 39 37’30" 4000 3000 pd Robert 2000 Island S 1000 u pdndndndnd nd sq u 0 e 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 h a n n a River Garrett Island Furnace Bay River Mill Creek Baker Havre Cove de Grace Sandy Cove Stump Point Northeast Concord Point High Point Cara Cove Susquehanna Carpenter Flats Point 39 30’00" Battery Island Swan Creek Spesutie er iv Narrows Spesutie R lk Island E Mosquito Creek Back Creek Pond Creek Chesapeake Bay 76 07’30" 76 00’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in Northern Chesapeake Bay (CB1TF) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) NORTF (Hectares) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 ndndndndnd 0 0 * nd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 39 37’30" North East Charlestown Hance Point Sandy Northeast River Cove Roach Point Carpenter Cara Cove Point Piney Creek Cove 76 00’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Northeast River (NORTF) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) 2004 SAV Upper Bay Zone Results 39 37’30" Plum Point Locust Point Paddyle Sandy idd Cove B Northeast River Cove Cara Cove Long Branch Piney Chesapeake and Creek Delaware Canal Cove Back Creek Hylands iver Herring Creek k R Point El 39 30’00" Elk Town Neck Pt. Rich Timber hemia Point Pt. Bo River Greenbush Veazey Pt. Cove Arnold Cabin Pt. John ELKOH (Hectares) Creek 900 800 700 600 Pearce Creek 500 Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake 400 300 200 100 * ndndndndnd * * nd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 76 00’00" 75 52’30" 75 45’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV Figure 1: SAV distribution in the Elk River (ELKOH) in 2004 (See Figure 11 for key.) 1 Plum Creek Paddy Piddle Cove Long Branch Piney Chesapeake and Creek Delaware Canal Cove Back Creek iver k R Herring Creek El 39 30’00" Town Rich Point Point ia River Bohem Great Bohemia Creek Veazey Cove Cabin John Creek Little Bohemia Creek Scotchman Creek BOHOH (Hectares) 300 250 Back Creek McGill Creek 200 150 100 Dowdel Creek 50 0 ndndndndnd 0 * 0 nd * * * * 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 39 22’30" 75 52’30" 75 45’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Bohemia River (BOHOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) C&DOH (Hectares) 4 3 2 1 ndndndndnd 0 0 0 0 nd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Plum Creek Elk River Paddy Piddle Long Branch Cove Canal ware reek e and D ela ck C eak Ba ap e s Ch Herring Creek 39 30’00" 75 52’30" 75 45’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal (C&DOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) 39 30’00" CB2OH (Hectares) 600 500 400 Spesutie 300 Narrows 200 pd 100 pd pd pd ndndndnd nd * * pd* 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Delph Creek Romney Creek Bush River 39 22’30" Gunpowder River Still Pond Still Pond Creek Boone Creek y Carroll a Point Fords Point B Churn Middle River e k Creek a Weir Robins e Rickett p Point Point a Point s Worton Creek e Pooles h C Booby Point Island Browns Creek Fairlee Creek 39 15’00" 76 22’30" 76 15’00" 76 07’30" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in Upper Chesapeake Bay (CB2OH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) SASOH (Hectares) 600 500 400 300 200 100 ndndndndnd nd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Chesapeake McGill Creek Bay Foreman Creek Money Creek Grove Point Cox Creek Sassafras River Dowdel Creek Ordinary Pt. 39 22’30" Woodland Creek Dyer Creek Lloyd Creek Turner Creek Freeman Creek 39 15’00" 76 00’00" 75 52’30" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Sassafras River (SASOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) BSHOH (Hectares) 450 400 39 30’00" 350 300 250 200 150 100 pd 50 * ndndndndndpd* nd nd 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 * 0 pd* 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Church Creek Otter Point Creek Bush River ek re C y Army e n Chemical m o Center R Tapler Point Kings Creek Redmon Gunpowder Cove River Wilson Point Towner 39 22’30" Cove Doves Cove Swaderick Creek Aberdeen Proving Grounds Watson Abbey Creek Point Chesapeake Bay 76 15’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Bush River (BSHOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) GUNOH (Hectares) 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 pd pd 100 ndndndndnd nd nd nd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Army Chemical Center Gunpowder Falls State Park Kings Creek Gunpowder Bird River River Wilson Point 39 22’30" Oliver Point Railroad Creek Swaderick Creek Cunninghill Dundee Cove Aberdeen Creek Proving Grounds Watson Saltpeter Creek Creek Battery Point Days Point Seneca Creek Carroll Point Middle Hawthorne Cove Neck River Weir Gunpowder Point Rickett Point 76 22’30" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Gunpowder River (GUNOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) MIDOH (Hectares) 350 300 250 Gunpowder River 200 39 22’30" 150 100 50 ndndndndnd nd nd * nd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Gunpowder River + Dundee Creek S a l tp ete Dark Head r C reek C Frog Mortar Creek re ek Battery Stansbury Creek Point Hopkins Creek Seneca Hawthorne Cove Creek Corsica Creek M Galloway iddle Creek Norman Ri Creek ve r Bowley Hogpen Creek Bar GreyhoundCove Holly Beach Muddy Gut Sue Creek B ack Riv er Chesapeake Browns Bay Creek 76 22’30" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Middle River (MIDOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) BACOH (Hectares) 12.5 10 7.5 5 2.5 0 nd 0 0 ndnd 0 0 0 0 nd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bi 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 39 22’30" Frog Mortar Creek Dark Head Creek Stansbury Creek Hopkins Creek Northeast Creek Piney Pt. Middle River Norman Creek Deep Creek Hogpen Cr. Cove Greyhound Northwest Muddy Sue Cr. Harbor B Gut ack Ri ve r Colgate Creek Bear Creek r e Riv o 39 15’00" Patapsco River c s Lynch p Point ta a P Creek nes o J 76 30’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Back River (BACOH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) CB3MH (Hectares) 600 500 pd 400 300 200 39 15’00" 100 pd ndndndnd nd pd* * pd* 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Old Road Bay Shallow Creek Patapsco River reek C Swan d ek r e Creek o r Shipping f C g n d Creek a r o L f k g r n o a L F t Tavern Creek k s r e o F W t The s a Haven E Huntingfield Creek Ashlar Pond 39 07’30" Wharf Greys Locust Cove Inn Creek Creek Cr. Langford Sillery Bay Chesapeake Bay Magothy Wilson River Pond Chester River Eastern Neck Narrows Love Point Eastern NeckIs. Kent Island Chester River 39 00’00" 76 22’30" 76 15’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in Upper Central Chesapeake Bay (CB3MH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) PATMH (Hectares) 125 100 39 22’30" 75 50 25 pdndndndnd 0 0 0 0 nd 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 nd 0 nd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Back River 39 15’00" Bear Creek Curtis Bay Old Road Bay Cox P Creek a ta p sc o R iv er Stony Creek Rock Creek 39 07’30" Wharf Creek 76 37’30" 76 30’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Patapsco River (PATMH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) MAGMH (Hectares) 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 pd Back Creek 25 ndndndnd * nd 0 0 0 0 nd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Main Creek 39 07’30" Oldman Creek Cornfield Creek Grays Cockey Creek Blackhole Creek Tar Creek Cove Steedmans Magothy Narrows Point reek C d a o Sillery r B B Little a Cattail Creek Cr. Park y Island Dobbins Gibson Island Island Mill Creek Ulmsteads Point M Cypress Creek ago thy Dividing Creek R iv er Shore Acres Creek Forked Creek Deep Se Asquith ve Creek rn R Little i v e MagothyRiver r Creek Chase Brewer Creek 76 30’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Magothy River (MAGMH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key). CHSMH (Hectares) 1250 39 15’00" pd Morgan 1000 Creek 750 500 250 ndndndnd nd 0 pd 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 Chesapeake Bay Shipping Creek Southeast Creek Philip Swan Creek Point Creek Comegys Fore Creek 39 07’30" k e Herrington e Creek r C White Cove d r o f G g Chester River r a n a y s L I n Cliffs Bight n Corsica River C r e e k Robin Eastern Cove Quarter Cove Middle Neck Eastern Neck Narrows Grove Creek Durdin Creek Shipyard Creek Ch es te r Queenstown River Hail Creek Creek 39 00’00" Macum Creek Winchester Piney Creek Creek Prospect Bay 76 15’00" 76 07’30" 76 00’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Lower Chester River (CHSMH) in 2004. (See Figure 11 for key.) CHSOH (Hectares) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 nd 0 0 ndnd 0 0 0 0 nd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 787980818283848586878889909192939495969798990001020304 39 15’00" Morgan Creek Foreman Branch Ch es te r R i v e r Southeast Creek Island Creek 39 07’30" 76 00’00" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Middle Chester River (CHSOH) in 2004.(See Figure 11 for key.) Chesterville 39 15’00" Lion Branch C River h e t er Crumpton F s o r e m a n B r a n c h 75 52’30" 1012345Kilometers 2004 SAV SAV distribution in the Upper Chester River (CHSTF) in 2004.
Recommended publications
  • (TMDL) for Bacteria, Mercury, Nutrients, and Sediment

    (TMDL) for Bacteria, Mercury, Nutrients, and Sediment

    Harford County, Maryland Loch Raven Reservoir Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Bacteria, Mercury, Nutrients, and Sediment The Loch Raven Reservoir Watershed, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for bacteria (December 2009), mercury (August 2004), and nutrients and sediment (March 2007) were established by Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) and approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). On December 30, 2014, MDE reissued the Phase I National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit to the County. The permit has several new requirements, including stringent stormwater management criteria, implementation of strategies to reduce litter and floatables, and development of restoration plans. Part IV.E.2.b of the NPDES MS4 permit requires the County to develop restoration plans to address stormwater wasteload allocations (SW-WLAs) for the waterbodies in the County that have EPA-approved TMDLs. Attachment B of the County’s NPDES MS4 permit lists eight waterbodies in the County that have TMDLs for various impairments. Table 1 lists the waterbodies, type of TMDL, and the impairment. Table 1: EPA-Approved TMDLs in Harford County Type of TMDL Watershed Impairment Local Bynum Run Sediment Swan Creek Nutrients Loch Raven Reservoir (Non-Tidal) Bacteria Loch Raven Reservoir Mercury Loch Raven Reservoir Nutrients and Sediment Chesapeake Bay Bush River Oligohaline Nutrients and Sediment Gunpowder River Olighaline Nutrients and Sediment Chesapeake Bay Mainstem 1 Tidal Fresh Nutrients and Sediment Chesapeake Bay Mainstem 2 Oligohaline Nutrients and Sediment The Loch Raven Reservoir Watershed is located in Maryland and includes a small contribution from Pennsylvania. The Maryland portion of the watershed is located almost entirely within the northern section of Baltimore County.
  • Gunpowder River

    Gunpowder River

    Table of Contents 1. Polluted Runoff in Baltimore County 2. Map of Baltimore County – Percentage of Hard Surfaces 3. Baltimore County 2014 Polluted Runoff Projects 4. Fact Sheet – Baltimore County has a Problem 5. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Back River 6. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Gunpowder River 7. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Middle River 8. Sources of Pollution in Baltimore County – Patapsco River 9. FAQs – Polluted Runoff and Fees POLLUTED RUNOFF IN BALTIMORE COUNTY Baltimore County contains the headwaters for many of the streams and tributaries feeding into the Patapsco River, one of the major rivers of the Chesapeake Bay. These tributaries include Bodkin Creek, Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls, Patapsco River Lower North Branch, Liberty Reservoir and South Branch Patapsco. Baltimore County is also home to the Gunpowder River, Middle River, and the Back River. Unfortunately, all of these streams and rivers are polluted by nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment and are considered “impaired” by the Maryland Department of the Environment, meaning the water quality is too low to support the water’s intended use. One major contributor to that pollution and impairment is polluted runoff. Polluted runoff contaminates our local rivers and streams and threatens local drinking water. Water running off of roofs, driveways, lawns and parking lots picks up trash, motor oil, grease, excess lawn fertilizers, pesticides, dog waste and other pollutants and washes them into the streams and rivers flowing through our communities. This pollution causes a multitude of problems, including toxic algae blooms, harmful bacteria, extensive dead zones, reduced dissolved oxygen, and unsightly trash clusters.
  • DNR Fine Schedule

    DNR Fine Schedule

    JOHN P. MORRISSEY DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND 187 Harry S Truman Parkway, 5th Floor Chief Judge Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Tel: (410) 260-1525 Fax: (410) 260-1375 December 31, 2020 TO: All Law Enforcement Officers of the State of Maryland Authorized to Issue Citations for Violations of the Natural Resources Laws The attached list is a fine or penalty deposit schedule for certain violations of the Natural Resources laws. The amounts set out on this schedule are to be inserted by you in the appropriate space on the citation. A defendant who does not care to contest guilt may prepay the fine in that amount. The fine schedule is applicable whether the charge is made by citation, a statement of charges, or by way of criminal information. For some violations, a defendant must stand trial and is not permitted to prepay a fine or penalty deposit. Additionally, there may be some offenses for which there is no fine listed. In both cases, you should check the box which indicates that the defendant must appear in court on the offense. I understand that this fine schedule has been approved for legal sufficiency by the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Natural Resources. This schedule has, therefore, been adopted pursuant to the authority vested in the Chief Judge of the District Court by the Constitution and laws of the State of Maryland. It is effective January 1, 2021, replacing all schedules issued prior hereto, and is to remain in force and effect until amended or repealed. No law enforcement officer in the State is authorized to deviate from this schedule in any case in which they are involved.
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report

    Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report

    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
  • SP#46 Non-Associators in Harford County, Maryland at The

    SP#46 Non-Associators in Harford County, Maryland at The

    Non-Associators in Harford County, Maryland at the Onset of the Revolutionary War, 1775-1776 Compiled from Dr. George W. Archer’s Research and Annotated with Other Data and Family Information by Henry C. Peden, Jr., M.A. The Harford County Genealogical Society Special Publication No. 46 © 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD .....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION by Henry C. Peden, Jr. .................................................................................2 NON-ASSOCIATORS IN HARFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND AT THE ONSET OF THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR, 1775-1776 .................................................. 6-38 FORWARD SPECIAL PUBLICATION (SP) #46, Non-Associators in Harford County, Maryland at the Onset of the Revolutionary War, 1775-1776, will be particularly interesting and useful to some researchers. This publication may explain why an ancestor did not appear in some other traditional record (e.g., list of militia). Like SP#45, this publication is provided by the Society’s long-time member, Henry C. Peden, Jr., so the membership can be confident that the information presented was well researched. As Henry warns at the end of his introduction, you should not assume the people listed herein were Tories … they could have been Quaker, a doctor or a man of the cloth. The Board is particularly pleased that we are able to provide a second publication to the Society’s membership for 2013. INTRODUCTION In the latter part of the 19th century the indefatigable Dr. George Washington Archer (1824-1907) collected many records about Harford County. For the Revolutionary War era he compiled lists of Associators and Non-Associators. This manuscript includes his material about Non- Associators that I have annotated with family history information.
  • THE FISCHER FAMILY of BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND: a PICTURE of the LIFE of a GERMAN-AMERICAN FAMILY in the EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY in 1990, Rudolph F

    THE FISCHER FAMILY of BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND: a PICTURE of the LIFE of a GERMAN-AMERICAN FAMILY in the EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY in 1990, Rudolph F

    THE FISCHER FAMILY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND: A PICTURE OF THE LIFE OF A GERMAN-AMERICAN FAMILY IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY In 1990, Rudolph F. Fischer, Sr. finished writing his recollections from child- hood. Although Mr. Fischer intended his narrative solely for his family, the story he tells will likely appeal to many. He focuses on his own experiences yet recounts a virtual chronicle of life in rural Baltimore County in the early twentieth century. Mr. Fischer is now deceased, but his son, Rudolph, Jr., has graciously con- sented to the publication of his father's narrative in the Report. The story is presented largely as Mr. Fischer wrote it. Some explicit references to fami- ly members have been omitted, and several notes and illustrations have been added to make the whole accessible to a wider audience, particularly those who might not be intimately familiar with the geography of Baltimore City and County (Ed.). In June, 1896, my grandfather, Friedrich stated: "having declared an oath taken in J. Fischer, purchased four acres, one open court his intentions to become a citizen rood and eight perches1 of land on the of the United States and that he doth north side of Bird River Neck Road from absolutely renounce all allegiance and James J. Milling, He paid $40.00 per acre fidelity to the Emperor of Germany of or a total price of $172.00. whom he was heretofore a subject." Grandfather Fischer had recently In 1905 my father returned to his na- arrived in America from Germany, where he tive village of Widerau in Saxony to bring was born in 1842.
  • Recommended Maximum Fish Meals Each Year For

    Recommended Maximum Fish Meals Each Year For

    Recommended Maximum Meals Each Year for Maryland Waters Recommendation based on 8 oz (0.227 kg) meal size, or the edible portion of 9 crabs (4 crabs for children) Meal Size: 8 oz - General Population; 6 oz - Women; 3 oz - Children NOTE: Consumption recommendations based on spacing of meals to avoid elevated exposure levels Recommended Meals/Year Species Waterbody General PopulationWomen* Children** Contaminants 8 oz meal 6 oz meal 3 oz meal Anacostia River 15 11 8 PCBs - risk driver Back River AVOID AVOID AVOID Pesticides*** Bush River 47 35 27 PCBs - risk driver Middle River 13 9 7 Northeast River 27 21 16 Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor AVOID AVOID AVOID American Eel Patuxent River 26 20 15 Potomac River (DC Line to MD 301 1511 9 Bridge) South River 37 28 22 Centennial Lake No Advisory No Advisory No Advisory Methylmercury - risk driver Lake Roland 12 12 12 Pesticides*** - risk driver Liberty Reservoir 96 48 48 Methylmercury - risk driver Tuckahoe Lake No Advisory 93 56 Black Crappie Upper Potomac: DC Line to Dam #3 64 49 38 PCBs - risk driver Upper Potomac: Dam #4 to Dam #5 77 58 45 PCBs & Methylmercury - risk driver Crab meat Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor 96 96 24 PCBs - risk driver Crab "mustard" Middle River DO NOT CONSUME Blue Crab Mid Bay: Middle to Patapsco River (1 meal equals 9 crabs) Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor "MUSTARD" (for children: 4 crabs ) Other Areas of the Bay Eat Sparingly Anacostia 51 39 30 PCBs - risk driver Back River 33 25 20 Pesticides*** Middle River 37 28 22 Northeast River 29 22 17 Brown Bullhead Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor 17 13 10 South River No Advisory No Advisory 88 * Women = of childbearing age (women who are pregnant or may become pregnant, or are nursing) ** Children = all young children up to age 6 *** Pesticides = banned organochlorine pesticide compounds (include chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, or heptachlor epoxide) As a general rule, make sure to wash your hands after handling fish.
  • Watersheds.Pdf

    Watersheds.Pdf

    Watershed Code Watershed Name 02130705 Aberdeen Proving Ground 02140205 Anacostia River 02140502 Antietam Creek 02130102 Assawoman Bay 02130703 Atkisson Reservoir 02130101 Atlantic Ocean 02130604 Back Creek 02130901 Back River 02130903 Baltimore Harbor 02130207 Big Annemessex River 02130606 Big Elk Creek 02130803 Bird River 02130902 Bodkin Creek 02130602 Bohemia River 02140104 Breton Bay 02131108 Brighton Dam 02120205 Broad Creek 02130701 Bush River 02130704 Bynum Run 02140207 Cabin John Creek 05020204 Casselman River 02140305 Catoctin Creek 02130106 Chincoteague Bay 02130607 Christina River 02050301 Conewago Creek 02140504 Conococheague Creek 02120204 Conowingo Dam Susq R 02130507 Corsica River 05020203 Deep Creek Lake 02120202 Deer Creek 02130204 Dividing Creek 02140304 Double Pipe Creek 02130501 Eastern Bay 02141002 Evitts Creek 02140511 Fifteen Mile Creek 02130307 Fishing Bay 02130609 Furnace Bay 02141004 Georges Creek 02140107 Gilbert Swamp 02130801 Gunpowder River 02130905 Gwynns Falls 02130401 Honga River 02130103 Isle of Wight Bay 02130904 Jones Falls 02130511 Kent Island Bay 02130504 Kent Narrows 02120201 L Susquehanna River 02130506 Langford Creek 02130907 Liberty Reservoir 02140506 Licking Creek 02130402 Little Choptank 02140505 Little Conococheague 02130605 Little Elk Creek 02130804 Little Gunpowder Falls 02131105 Little Patuxent River 02140509 Little Tonoloway Creek 05020202 Little Youghiogheny R 02130805 Loch Raven Reservoir 02139998 Lower Chesapeake Bay 02130505 Lower Chester River 02130403 Lower Choptank 02130601 Lower
  • Fall/Winter 2018 Volume 9, Issue 2 a Publication of the Maryland Native

    Fall/Winter 2018 Volume 9, Issue 2 a Publication of the Maryland Native

    Fall/Winter 2018 A Publication of the Maryland Native Plant Society Volume 9, Issue 2 Letter from the President A Publication of the Maryland Native Plant Society Kirsten Johnson www.mdflora.org P.O. Box 4877 Silver Spring, MD 20914 Dear Members, Preparing Kerry Wixted’s article for this issue, I asked myself – What about my own small garden here CONTACTS in Baltimore City? It’s almost all native plants, but is it maximized for pollinators? Am I doing it Membership & Website right? ese thoughts were completely contrary to my typical exhortations to people wondering Karyn Molines, [email protected] about planting native. I always say, ‘Just get started! You don’t need to be an expert!” I still believe that Marilandica Editors and I applaud each individual decision to go with native sedges instead of (God forbid!) English ivy Kirsten Johnson, [email protected] as a ground cover. Or to tolerate a certain number of white snakeroots sneaking in, and to leave dead Vanessa Beauchamp, [email protected] stalks standing through the winter. No one will convert to native gardening if we make it too hard. General Inquiries But I personally will make two changes based on Kerry’s advice. I’ll stop buying a little of this and a [email protected] little of that. No more plant zoo. I’ll concentrate on a few piedmont native plants that will thrive MNPS CHAPTERS without tending (since I’m not going to tend them) and I’ll turn off my outdoor lights. Our planet is Eastern Shore in trouble.
  • 2000 Data Report Gunpowder River, Patapsco/Back River West Chesapeake Bay and Patuxent River Watersheds

    2000 Data Report Gunpowder River, Patapsco/Back River West Chesapeake Bay and Patuxent River Watersheds

    2000 Data Report Gunpowder River, Patapsco/Back River West Chesapeake Bay and Pat uxent River Watersheds Gunpowder River Basin Patapsco /Back River Basin Patuxent River Basin West Chesapeake Bay Basin TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 GUNPOWDER RIVER SUB-BASIN ............................................................................. 9 GUNPOWDER RIVER....................................................................................................... 10 LOWER BIG GUNPOWDER FALLS ................................................................................... 16 BIRD RIVER.................................................................................................................... 22 LITTLE GUNPOWDER FALLS ........................................................................................... 28 MIDDLE RIVER – BROWNS............................................................................................. 34 PATAPSCO RIVER SUB-BASIN................................................................................. 41 BACK RIVER .................................................................................................................. 43 BODKIN CREEK .............................................................................................................. 49 JONES FALLS .................................................................................................................. 55 GWYNNS FALLS ............................................................................................................
  • Driving Directions to Deep Creek Lake Maryland

    Driving Directions to Deep Creek Lake Maryland

    Driving Directions To Deep Creek Lake Maryland Papular Vergil improved leastwise while Rolph always abscising his brees camouflage smart, he robbing so compassionately. Is Bernd uncorrected or cerebrospinal when drop-outs some werewolf disharmonised fleetly? Presbyterian Quent bidden no diplomatists enter jocularly after Giffie lathers jingoistically, quite counteractive. Trade in accordance with long weekend, but she especially loves to follow us employment showroom hours in partnership with a small town in your orders wherever you. University park service on lake. That are housed in your investment property amenities like to offer visitors can enjoy breakfast is based on this website, via an eastbound direction. Contact Western Maryland Dermatology. Remember to side these times based on barometric pressure, their legacy assorted cultural sights, take together on St. Publications of the Maryland Geological Survey' under moderate direction of Prof. Download for deep creek lake vacation like dining, drive is a more difficult time you must be fun things to deep creek lake park expects you? Want to deep creek lake station to share this item from your drives will receive a few. Your drives to reset your car dealer maryland rather than that allows us all. You better sense that route really want you me have only good whatsoever and nerve did. Both the subject River arms Upper Yough River rafting locations are convenient easy driving distance than the popular Deep dry Lake south area. Children new car seats or booster seats are free. See reviews, including clinical trials, and more. Get Walmart hours driving directions and dig out weekly. Climbing in Deep Creek court Creek solar Project.
  • Water Chestnut (Trapa Natans) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: a Regional Management Plan

    Water Chestnut (Trapa Natans) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: a Regional Management Plan

    Water Chestnut (Trapa natans) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: A Regional Management Plan Prepared by: Mike Naylor Maryland Department of Natural Resources December 10, 2003 Regional Trapa natans Working Group Membership List Mike Naylor Maryland Department of Natural Resources Laura Goldblatt Chesapeake Bay Program i Executive Summary Trapa natans, commonly known as water chestnut, is a non-native aquatic macrophyte with a long invasion history in North America. Water chestnut is an annual herb with a floating rosette of leaves around a central stem that is rooted in the sediment. The plant spreads rapidly and seeds can remain dormant for up to 12 years. Due to its dense canopy formation, water chestnut impedes navigation and can have a substantial impact on native species of submerged grasses, as it is capable of blocking all sunlight from reaching the sediment surface. Since it’s first introduction in the late 1800’s, many Chesapeake Bay partner states have been forced to devote extensive financial resources for combating water chestnut, including New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. It has been demonstrated repeatedly that if discovered in the early stages of expansion, aggressive and persistent local control can be effective at reducing populations to near extinction. When allowed to expand unchecked, or if control is intermittent, massive problems develop that create both ecological change and substantial water use restrictions. Water chestnut was first recorded in North America near Concord, Massachusetts in 1859. Wild populations have since become established in many locations in the Northeastern United States. Within the Chesapeake Bay watershed, water chestnut first appeared in the Potomac River near Washington, D.C.