USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama #73 5 June 2001 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established here at the Air War College in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal to Lt. Col. Michael W. Ritz, CPC Intelligence/Public Affairs or JoAnn Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953- 7538 or DSN 493-7538. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved May 21, 2001 Contact: HHS Press Office (202) 690-6343 HHS INITIATIVE PREPARES FOR POSSIBLE BIOTERRORISM THREAT Overview: While the exact risks are unknown, the use of biological weapons by terrorists potentially could result in life-threatening illness on a large scale. Even a lone terrorist could cause a major disease outbreak in the population - and, in the case of communicable disease, the outbreak could spread in successive waves of infection. Unlike explosions or chemical releases, a bioterrorist attack could be surreptitious and thus difficult and time- consuming to detect. Symptoms might not occur among victims for days or weeks, and those initially presenting themselves to physicians and clinics might be geographically dispersed. A strong public health network would be needed to piece together early reports and quickly determine what had happened. Once detected, the situation could overwhelm local health systems that are faced not only with the tasks of caring for mass casualties but also with the demands of even larger numbers of people requiring preventive care…. http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2001pres/01fsbioterrorism.html Monday May 28 8:00 PM ET U.N. Arms Experts Training in Canada OTTAWA (AP)- Some 60 arms experts with the United Nations (news - web sites) inspection mission in Iraq have begun five weeks of training in Canada, the government said Monday. The chief weapons inspector with the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in Iraq, Hans Blix, was due to visit Ottawa to address the trainees, who come from 28 countries. ``Canada's hosting of this training exercise underscores this country's support for UNMOVIC and its mandate,'' the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade said in a statement. The U.N. agency's mandate is to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction and to set up a monitoring and verification system. But Baghdad has yet to agree to let the team in. The last group of inspectors left the country in December 1998. Iraq, which is under U.N. sanctions for its invasion of Kuwait, argues that there is no need for more inspections as all its weapons have been accounted for. But the United Nations says the sanctions will not be lifted until the inspectors certify that the weapons have been destroyed. http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20010528/wl/canada_iraq_1.html Baltimore Sun May 31, 2001 White House Considers OK Of Biological Weapons Ban WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is deciding whether to support a draft agreement to enforce an international treaty banning biological weapons, State Department spokesman Philip Reeker said yesterday. The 1972 treaty, which 143 nations have ratified, prohibits the development, production and possession of biological weapons. It has always lacked a means of verifying compliance, however. After six years of negotiations, diplomats in Geneva have produced a draft, or protocol, that would establish steps to monitor the ban. Case Narrative Reported Chemical Warfare Agent Exposure in the 2d Reconnaissance Battalion Case Narratives are reports of what we know today about certain events of the 1990-1991 Gulf War. This case narrative focuses on a group of Marines who reportedly experienced injuries that appeared symptomatic of chemical warfare agent exposure. This is an interim, not a final, report. We hope you will read this and contact us with any information that would help us better understand the events reported here. With your help, we will be able to report more accurately on the events surrounding the incident(s) reported in this narrative. Please contact us to report any new information by calling: 1-800-497-6261 Office of the Special Assistant to the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) for Gulf War Illnesses, Medical Readiness, and Military Deployments Department of Defense Last Update: May 25, 2001 Many veterans of the Gulf War have expressed concern their unexplained illnesses may result from their experiences in that war. In response to veterans’ concerns, the Department of Defense established a task force in June 1995 to investigate incidents and circumstances relating to possible causes. The Office of the Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of Defense for Gulf War Illnesses assumed responsibility for these investigations on November 12, 1996, and continued to investigate reports of chemical warfare agent incidents. Effective April 5, 2001, this office became the Office of the Special Assistant to the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) for Gulf War Illnesses, Medical Readiness, and Military Deployments, with continued responsibility for Gulf War issues…. http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/2d_recon/ New York Times June 1, 2001 Pg. 1 Missile Defenses Need More Tests, Key Senator Says By Thom Shanker WASHINGTON, May 31 — The next chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said today that it was highly unlikely that missile defenses would be fielded in President Bush's current term, and should not be deployed at all until repeated tests proved their effectiveness. The senator, Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan, said he was confident that the nation had both the treasury and technology for missile defenses. But he predicted that diplomatic battles over the Antiballistic Missile Treaty and the scientific hurdles meant "the odds are against" deployment by the end of 2004. "I don't think the technology is likely to develop fast enough, even if he decided to violate the treaty," Mr. Levin said, referring to Mr. Bush, in an interview. "And I think our European allies have responded with caution and concern to such a degree that the president is going to have to look again at the complexities of the issue." In the interview, Mr. Levin laid out his agenda — and therefore that of the Senate's new leadership — on military affairs. He emphasized that he would not occupy himself solely with the high-profile issues of strategic nuclear posture and billion-dollar weapons systems, but would focus on improving pay, health care and housing for those in uniform. He also said he would try to modernize the Pentagon's purchasing practices and push for another round of base closings to save money. Mr. Levin also energetically endorsed the role played by American troops in peacekeeping operations in the Balkans and in Sinai. Mr. Bush and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld have questioned the peacekeeping missions, saying they divert money and troops from more important assignments. As head of a committee widely recognized for striving to maintain a calm, nonpartisan approach to national security, Senator Levin said that he planned to "make sure that we look at the realities of a national missile defense, not just look at that one threat that has been focused on, the North Korea threat, or just the threat from ballistic missiles." Proponents of Mr. Bush's still- evolving plan to rapidly deploy missile defenses — unilaterally if need be, and even before they are proven effective — see Mr. Levin's comments not as cautionary speed bumps, but as barriers consciously set too high. Frank J. Gaffney Jr., a missile defense advocate who served in the Pentagon in the Reagan administration, said: "To the extent that he decides to make stopping missile defense one of his principal priorities, it will greatly compound the challenge the president has in doing what he said — in the course of the campaign and more recently — he is determined to do." Mr. Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy, a conservative defense analysis group, described Mr. Levin's technical requirements for deploying missile defense as "a delaying action." On May 11, before Senator James M. Jeffords of Vermont defected from the Republican Party — giving Democrats control of the Senate as of next week — Mr. Levin spoke on missile defense at the National Defense University. Initially, his comments garnered little attention. Today, the speech is becoming required reading in Pentagon circles as the most detailed agenda of the man who is to become the most powerful Senate voice on military affairs. "There is a serious possibility that if we take the wrong approach, it would decrease our security and increase the risk of nuclear proliferation," Mr. Levin said of unilateral deployment of missile defenses.
Recommended publications
  • Presidential Documents
    Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, December 18, 2006 Volume 42—Number 50 Pages 2147–2171 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:34 Dec 19, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P50DEF4.015 P50DEF4 Contents Addresses and Remarks Letters and Messages See also Meetings With Foreign Leaders Hanukkah 2006, message—2168 Presidential Medal of Freedom, Meetings With Foreign Leaders presentation—2162 Radio address—2148 Benin, President Yayi—2157 State Department, meeting with senior Iraq, Deputy President Hashimi—2152 officials—2151 Proclamations Virginia Armed Forces Full Honor Review for Human Rights Day, Bill of Rights Day, and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld—2166 Human Rights Week—2147 Defense Department, meeting with senior Wright Brothers Day—2168 officials in Arlington—2153 Statements by the President White House Summit on Malaria—2158 Congressional passage Communications to Federal Agencies Fisheries management legislation—2150 Designation of Officers of the Department of Outer Continental Shelf legislation—2149 Justice, memorandum—2148 Ryan White CARE Act, reauthorization Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of legislation—2150 the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act U.S.-India nuclear energy cooperation of 1962, as Amended, memorandum—2162 legislation—2151 Presidential Determination on Sanctions Vietnam, permanent trade relations Against North Korea for Detonation of a legislation—2150 Nuclear Explosive Device, memorandum— Sudan, Darfur situation—2151 2147 Syrian Government—2156 Executive Orders Supplementary Materials Amendment to Executive Order 13317, Acts approved by the President—2171 Volunteers for Prosperity—2162 Checklist of White House press releases— 2170 Interviews With the News Media Digest of other White House Exchange with reporters in Arlington, VA— announcements—2169 2153 Nominations submitted to the Senate—2170 WEEKLY COMPILATION OF Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Docu- ments, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 74) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 74) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) HYATT REGENCY HOUSE FEBRUARY 4 1975 ATLANTA, GEORGIA TIME DAY 7:55 a.m. TUESDAY PHONE - TIME ACTIVITY In Out The President was an,overIiight guest)(at the Hyatt Regency House, 265 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia. 8:00 The President went to the Tudor Ioom. 8:00 9:35 The President attended a working breakfast with newspaper editors, publishers, and broadcast executives. For a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "A.II 9:35 The President returned to his suite. 10:20 11:25 The President met with Ernest J.E. Griffes, Treasurer of Haxelhurst and Associates, consulting actuaries in Atlanta, Georgia. 11:31 The President went to his motorcade. 11:34 11:36 The President motored from the Hyatt Regency House to the Marriott Hotel, Courtland and Cain Street~, N.W. 11:36 1:25 The Fresident attended a luncheon for the 11th Annual Convention of the Opportunities Industrialization Centers. 11:36 The President was greeted by: Leon H. Sullivan, Founder of Opportunities Industrialization Center (OIC) and pastor of Zion Baptist Church, Philide~phia, Pennsylvania Maurice Dawkins, National Director of OIC Richard Stormont, Marriott Hotel General Manager The President, escorted by Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Dawkins, went to the Nation .fuf Brotherhood Room. The President met with headtcable guests. For a list of head table guests-i see APPENDIX liB." 11:56 The President went to the holding room.
    [Show full text]
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ______
    07-4943-cv IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ JOHN DOE INC., JOHN DOE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and VALERIE E. CAPRONI, in her official capacity as General Counsel to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________ BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE, NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE AND ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ___________________ Meredith Fuchs National Security Archive George Washington University 2130 H St. NW, Suite 701 Washington, D.C. 20037 202-994-7000 Marcia Hofmann Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415-436-9333 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 26.1, amicus curiae the National Security Archive discloses that it is a project of the National Security Archive Fund, Inc. The National Security Archive Fund, Inc. is a not-for- profit corporation established under the laws of the District of Columbia. The National Security Archive Fund, Inc. has no parent corporation and no stock, thus no publicly held corporation owns ten percent or more of its stock. The Archive identifies that its general nature and purpose is to promote research and public education on U.S. governmental and national security decisionmaking and to promote and encourage openness in government and government accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Cost of the Military Industrial Complex
    The Economic Cost of the Military Industrial Complex By James Quinn "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hope of its children." These must be the words of some liberal Democratic Senator running for President in 2008. But no, these are the words of Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander during World War II, five decades ago. The United States, the only superpower remaining on earth, currently spends more on military than the next 45 highest spending countries in the world combined. The U.S. accounts for 48% of the world’s total military spending. Where did the peace dividend from winning the Cold War go? (click to enlarge images) The United States spends on its military 5.8 times more than China, 10.2 times more than Russia, and 98.6 times more than Iran. The Cold War has been over for 20 years, but we are spending like World War III is on the near term horizon. There is no country on earth that can challenge the U.S. militarily. So, why are we spending like we are preparing for a major conflict? The impression on the rest of the world is that we have aggressive intentions. The administration is posturing like Iran is a threat to our security.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford, SACEUR Alexander M. Haig, Donald Rumsfeld
    File scanned from the National Security Adviser's Memoranda of Conversation Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library I NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Presidential Libraries Withdrawal Sheet WITHDRAWAL ID 010807 REASON FOR WITHDRAWAL National security restriction TYPE OF MATERIAL • Memorandum of Conversation CREATOR'S NAME. · Ford/Haig/Rumsfeld/Scowcroft CREATION DATE · 03/27/1975 VOLUME • • . 5 pages COLLECTION/SERIES/FOLDER ID • 036600109 COLLECTION TITLE • • . • NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER. MEORANDA OF CONVERSATIONS BOX NUMBER •. • 10 FOLDER TITLE • . • March 27, 1975 - Ford, SACEUR Alexander Haig, Donald Rumsfeld DATE WITHDRAWN • • • • . • 02/01/2000 WITHDRAWING ARCHIVIST • • • • LET ~ '+/~/()S q Is /10 MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE DECLASSIFIED wI portIon....mptM WASHINGTON f.O. 12958 (as amended) see!u ~T /NODJS/XGDS MR # /.." -II"; "1'" P1IIG I{.w 'i1.5/Jo,' osl> J.Ad/ni! 'fj ~~q~ .~ Date IO/!;J.UP.."" MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS: President Ford General Alexander M. Haig, Supreme Allied Commander, Europe Amb. Donald Rumsfeld, Assistant to the President Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs DATE AND TIME: March 27, 1975 5:15 p.m. PLACE: The Oval Office The White House [Photographers were admitted briefly and then dismissed] President: Why don't you fill us in? Haig: I have good news and bad news. The good news is that the United States forces have really turned around. They still need a little more training but things are very good. The Allies are better, too, except for Canada. The Dutch service is doing a lot of breast beating, but the British and the Danes are up five percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks Hon. Donald Rumsfeld Hon. B
    1146 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS January 16, 1969 H.R. 3977. A blll for the relief of Falesca H.R. 3988. A blll for the relief of Lucia By Mr. SIKES: Knight; to the Committee on the Judiciary. Tortorella; to the Committee on the Judi­ H.R. 4000. A bill for the relief of Do Sung H.R. 3978. A bill for the relief of Maria ciary. Deuk; to the Committee on the Judiciary. Pinazzi; to the Committee on the Judiciary, · By Mr. RHODES: By Mr. TIERNAN: By Mr. POLLOCK: H.R. 3989. A bill for the relief of Vladko H.R. 4001. A blll for the relief of Anna Elsa H.R. 3979. A bill to authorize the Secre­ Dimitrov Denev; to the Committee on the Bayer; to the Committee on the Judiciary. tary of the Interior to consider a petition Judiciary. H.R. 4002. A bill for the relief of Chu Yi for reinstatement of certain oil and gas By Mr. ROGERS of Florida (by re­ Chang; to the Committee on the Judiciary. leases; to the Committee on Interior and quest): H.R. 4003. A bill for the relief of Jose Marta Insular Affairs. H.R. 3990. A bill for the relief of Harvey Sousa Costa; to the Committee on the Ju­ By Mr. PURCELL: E. Ward; to the Committee on the Judiciary. diciary. H.R. 3980. A bill for the relief of Reuben­ By Mr. ROSENTHAL: H.R. 4004. A bill for the relief of Giovanni stein D. Landreth; to the Committee on the H.R. 3991. A bill for the relief of Ben Zion Finocchiaro; to the Committee on the Ju­ Judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • On Shi Resignations T Surs Enter
    Resignations enter on Shi t Surs `Politics' at CIA Feared By Walter Pincus and Laurence Stern Washington Post Stall Writerg. Warnings that the ap- knOwledge of his background pointment of George Bush and experience in this field." could lead to election-year He said Bush's appointment manipulation of the sup- could. well "compromise the posedly nonpartisan Central independence of the CIA." ' Intelligence Agency were Hush, interviewedin Peking sounded yesterday on Capitol by Reuter, inadvertently may Hill and within the intelligence have added fuel to the con- community. , troversy with the observation Indicative of the reaction that he was not sure the CIA was the comment Of Sep,: appointment . meant his Frank Church (D-Idaho)t political career was over. "Once they used- to give for ,Bush currently heads the U.S. mer national party chairmen: liaison office in China, postmaster generalships—the President Ford in his press most political and least conference Monday night also sensitive job in government. fed the concern with the ob- Now they have given this . nervation that he did not think former party chairman "the' either ,Bush or Donald most sensitive and least '• Rumsfeld, his ,nominee' as political agency." Defense SecretarY, could be CA. assessments -.were sharply at odds with those of Church, chairman`of the eliminated from "con- sideration by anybody" for the - the Nixon White House and the Senate CIA investigating Defense Department Helmq committee, said he would be vice presidency. An illustration 'of 'the was willing 'to testify on obliged to vote against the Capitol Hill against then- 'confirmation of Bush.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL PROGRAM • #Aiaaspace © 2013 Lockheed Martin Corporation
    10–12 September 2013 San Diego Convention Center San Diego, California Organized by FINAL PROGRAM www.aiaa.org/space2013 • #aiaaSpace © 2013 Lockheed Martin Corporation MULTI-MISSION MAXIMUM RETURN Faster. Farther. Safer. Astronauts need new ships to travel deeper into the solar system. NASA’s Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle meets this challenge. On track for fi rst exploration fl ight test in 2014 and mission capability in 2017, Orion enables affordable stepping-stone missions to the far side of the Moon. Asteroids. The moons of Mars and beyond. www.lockheedmartin.com/orion MultiMission_Orion_AIAA.indd 1 7/29/2013 12:30:11 PM WELCOME Dear Colleagues: The members of the Executive Steering Committee are very excited to welcome you to the AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference & Exposition! This year’s event comes at a critical time for the space community as a number Greg Jones David King Vice President, Strategy Executive Vice President, of outside forces continue to shape decisions and directions. Budgets are being and Development, Orbital Dynetics, Inc squeezed, new players are emerging, business models are evolving. Now more Sciences Corporation than ever it is critical for government, industry, and academia to work together to lead the community forward in a sustainable direction, for all of us to continue our industry’s legacy of innovation to solve problems and exploit emerging opportunities, and to develop the technology that will enable the next steps in our shared journey outward. It is with these factors in mind that we have developed the program for AIAA SPACE 2013. The theme of “Sparking Ingenuity and Collaboration to Enable Mission Success” is explored through frank and forward-looking discussions designed to review the current achievements in space and highlight new initiatives and plans, while Peter McGrath Peter Montgomery surfacing the key issues and challenges that need to be addressed in order to Director, Space Exploration Resource Provisioning define clear roadmaps for future progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense
    The Strange Rebirth of Missile Defense: Why Republicans Resurrected Reagan’s Dream Paul Musgrave Introduction National missile defense, even in its stripped-down, post-Reagan version, died in 1993. The Clinton administration killed it; shifting funding from research on “Star Wars”-like projects to missile defense systems like the Patriot. Instead of building a shield that would protect all of America, the United States would henceforth try to construct only limited defenses that could protect troops deployed in a future battleground. Yet ten years later, the George W. Bush administration has broken ground on new testing sites for a planned national missile defense, and billions of dollars annually are flowing into research and construction of a nationwide missile shield. The Bush administration could claim, were it so inclined, that it was merely following its predecessors; the basic parts of the Bush system are the same as those President Clinton proposed to use in his national missile defense. Why did U.S. policy toward missile defenses shift so dramatically? How did National Missile Defense survive its apparent death in 1993? These questions are important. National missile defense, in all of its guises and architectures, is among the most complex technical challenges humans have ever attempted to solve. It is also among the most costly, with some estimates placing the total cost of a missile defense system at nearly a trillion dollars. Understanding the sources of NMD’s resurrection is critical to a deeper comprehension of American security policy in the early years of the twenty-first century. The rebirth of missile defense came from two sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald-Rumsfeld.Pdf
    Gerald R. Ford Oral History Project Donald Rumsfeld Interviewed by Richard Norton Smith March 31, 2009 Smith: First of all, thanks so much for doing this. You have a unique position in the Ford story because you’re one of a dwindling band who can talk with authority about Ford’s years in Congress, and indeed, were instrumental in his becoming Minority Leader. You came in in ’62... Rumsfeld: Right. I worked in the House of Representatives from 1957 to 1960. One of the Congressmen I worked for was Bob Griffin of Michigan. So there was an earlier connection. Smith: So you had contact with Ford earlier. Rumsfeld: Slightly. Gerald Ford was way up there and I was staff assistant to a couple of Republican Congressmen. I did, however, have an interesting connection though to Congressman Ford; one of the pilots with me in the Navy, Jim Dean, who was shot down by the Chinese, was from Grand Rapids. His wife went to Representative Ford when I was working on the Hill and came to see me. So I had an awareness of Gerald Ford back then. Some years later, 1974, Henry Kissinger and I were going into the Peoples’ Republic of China after we left Vladivostok, where President Ford had met with General Secretary Brezhnev. I was going through some papers and there was my friend Jim Dean’s name. Kissinger had been asked by the government to raise the question as to whether Dean’s body was found or whether he was in prison and if so, if they would release him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Plan
    M A Y 2 0 1 8 THE FLIGHT PLAN The Newsletter of AIAA Albuquerque Section The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA ALBUQUERQUE ATOMIC SENSORS – REV OLUTIONIZING POSITION, NAVIGATION AND TIMING DR. BRIAN KASCH, AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABO RATORY RVBYE INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Atomic physics is no longer SECTION CALENDAR 2 strictly a laboratory venture. Increas- MAY MEETING DETAILS 3 ingly, "quantum engineering" is By Arup Maji—Programs bringing the innate precision of at- FELLOWS AND ANNIVERSARIES 4 oms to real-world devices. While AIAA SECTION SCHOLARSHIP AWARD 4 atomic sensors have demonstrated SCIENCE FAIR WINNERS 5 state-of-the-art detection of inertial UNM ROCKET ENGINEERING UPDATE 5 forces (acceleration and rotation), magnetic fields, and the passage of er grid timing, air traffic control, on OFFICER BIOS 6 time, realizing robust devices contin- trains, on ships, etc. GPS is vulnerable ASTRONAUT HARRISON SCHMITT EVENT 11 ues to present extraordinary chal- to solar flares, jamming, spoofing, and AIAA REGION IV STUDENT CONFERENCE 13 lenges. Dr. Kasch discussed how direct attack (anti-satellite.) It does UNM OFFERS COMPOSITES COURSE 15 atomic sensors are transitioning not work underwater, and may not be from pure research to fielded envi- available indoors, in canyons, or in THIS MONTH IN AIR AND SPACE HISTORY 16 ronments. cities with tall buildings. PHOTO OF THE MONTH 17 These technologies promise Inertial measurement units SECTION INFORMATION 18 to revolutionize position, navigation are also used to get location. Atomic and timing for DoD and civilian appli- interferometer can be used for iner- cations. Furthermore, devices based tial navigation, but needs develop- on atomic sensing will open up new ment to be practical.
    [Show full text]