DOCSLIB.ORG

Benefits of Consulting with the Family Advocate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benefits of Consulting with the Family Advocate The Family Advocate protects the best interest of children You may consult the What is the Family Advocate when: You are in a dispute regarding contact or care Family Advocate? of a child. You want to draft and/or register a parental The Family Advocate is an unbiased rights and responsibilities agreement. This family law specialist who assists parents is a legal agreement made by both parents/parties in dispute (for example, those going regarding the care of their child which can be through a divorce) to reach an agreement registered with the Family Advocate. regarding the care and contact of You want to amend or terminate a parental their children. rights and responsibility agreement registered with the Family Advocate. There is a dispute on whether a father of a child born out of wedlock satisfies the requirements to acquire full parental rights and responsibilities in terms of the law. A court has made an order that the Family Advocate has to conduct an inquiry on the best interests of the child. If the parents/parties reach agreement on the care and contact Benefits of of their children, the matter does not proceed to court, thereby saving legal costs and time. consulting Courts will not readily issue a decree of divorce where there is a dispute regarding minor children without the report with the or recommendations of the Family Advocate. The Family Advocate can amend or terminate parental rights and responsibilities agreements registered by the Family Family Advocate’s office. This means that the parents/parties do not have to go to court if they want to amend the Advocate: agreement when the need arises. Parental rights and responsibilities agreements or parenting plans registered with the Family Advocate have the same legal effect as a court order. Courts or Judicial officers are required by law to consider the report and/or recommendations of the Family Advocate when making a decision in the best interests of a minor child. www.justice.gov.za @DOJCD_ZA at DOJ&CD) at DOJCD The Family Advocate protects the best interest of children The rights of parents Parents are expected to: Take care of their child/children. Maintain contact with their child/ children. Act as a guardian to their child/ Step-by-step guide children. Provide financial support to their on solving a dispute child/children. Provide for the needs of 1 Upon application by either of the parties or their child/children. by direction of the court, the Family Advocate will interview the parties in the presence of each other or separately where necessary, to ascertain their personal circumstances and background details in the matter. 2 The Office of the Family Advocate also The Family Advocate cannot become interviews the child with the assistance of the involved in any matter that has already been Family Counsellor in order to obtain and finalised by the court. convey the child’s views on the matter to The Family Advocate cannot be subpoenaed court. The aim is to protect the child from to court as a witness to give evidence on behalf of any party, even if his/her testifying in a potentially harsh court recommendation is in favour of that party. environment. A recommendation of the Family Advocate is intended to assist the Court in adjudicating a 3 The Family Advocate helps the parties reach matter. an agreeable or viable solution through A recommendation itself is not enforceable mediation by applying their legal expertise unless incorporated in a court order. and dispute resolution skills in the matter. The Family Advocate is a neutral institution and cannot act as a legal representative. 4 If the parties reach an agreement the Family Advocate will then help them draft a parenting plan or responsibilities and rights agreement which can be registered with the Office of the Family Advocate or made an order of court. 5 If the parties cannot reach an agreement, the Family Advocate will then compile a report for court and make a recommendation based on the enquiry that was conducted. www.justice.gov.za @DOJCD_ZA at DOJ&CD) at DOJCD Where do I find the offices of the Family Advocate? There are 26 established offices of the Family Advocate in all 9 provinces in the country. Office of the Chief Family Advocate: Pietermaritzburg - KZN Physical Address: 5th Floor, New Public Building Tel: 012-357 8022, Fax:012-357 8043 Tel: 033-342 0616, Fax:033-342 0587 (Magistrate Court), c/o Knight & Stead Street, E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Kimberley, 8301 Postal Address: Private Bag X81 PRETORIA 0001 Postal Address: Private Bag X 9134, Physical Address: 329 Pretoruis Street, Momentum Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Upington - NC Building, West Tower, Pretoria Physical Address: 239 Church Street , Tel: 054 337 5390, Fax:n/a Pietermaritzburg, 3200 E-mail: [email protected] Bloemfontein - FS Postal Address: Private Bag X3111, Tel: 051-447 1115, Fax:051-430 5052 East London (Buffalo City) - EC Worcester, 6849 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 043- 722 8866/7, Fax:043- 722 8868 Physical Address: 1 Weideman Str, Postal Address: P. O. Box 12457, Brandhof, 9324 E-mail: [email protected] Upington, 8801 Physical Address: 163 A Nelson Mandela Drive, Postal Address: Private Bag X0003, 2nd Floor Sanlam Building, Bloemfontein Southernwood, East London, 5213 Mafikeng (Mmabatho) - NW Physical Address: 29 St Peters Road , Tel: 018- 388 9500, Fax:018- 394 0915 Welkom - FS Southernwood, East London, 5200 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 057 353 1368/1375, Fax:n/a Postal Address: Private Bag x2232 E-mail: [email protected] Mthatha - EC Mafikeng South 2791 Postal Address: Private Bag X5, Welkom, 9460 Tel: 047 532 3998, Fax:047 532 5337 Physical Address: 461/805 Steve Biko Drive, Unit 2, Physical Address: Magistrate Court, c/o Heerden & E-mail: [email protected] Mmabatho, 2745 (Black and White building not far Buiten Str, Welkom, 9460 Postal Address: Private Bag X5255 from Department of Social Development) Mthatha, 5099 Cape Town - WC Physical Address: 6th Floor, Manpower Building, Rustenburg- NW Tel: 021-426 1216, Fax:021-424 6108 Corner of Elliot and Madeira Street, Mthatha, 5100 Tel: 014 592 0999/8 , Fax:014 592 1039 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Postal Address: Private Bag X 9003 , Port Elizabeth - EC Postal Address: N/A Cape Town , 8000 Tel: 041 585 5718, Fax:041 585 4459 Physical Address: C/o Nelson Mandela Drive & Physical Address: 55 Union Castle Building, 10th E-mail: [email protected] Klopper Str, Old SARS Bld, Rustenburg, 0300 Floor, c/o House Street & St George’s Mall, Cape Postal Address: Private Bag X 6080 , Town Port Elizabeth, 6000 Klerksdorp - NW Physical Address: No. 1 Bird Street, Tel: 018 464 8917, Fax:n/a Worcester - WC Central, Port Elizabeth, 3200 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 023 347 1238, Fax:023 347 1524 Postal Address: N/A E-mail: [email protected] Graaff Reinet - EC Physical Address: PC Pelser Building, Postal Address: Private Bag X3111, Tel: 049 891 1207, Fax:049 891 1209 Cnr Anderson & Voortrekker, Klerksdorp Worcester, 6849 E-mail: [email protected] Physical Address: 67 High Street, Postal Address: 20 Somerset Str, Nelspruit - MP Worcester, 6850 Graaff-Reinet, 6280 Tel: 013 - 752 2755/ 2762/ 2920, Physical Address: 20 Somerset Str, Fax: 013 - 752 3657 / 4896 or 086 754 2479 Mitchells Plain - WC Graaff-Reinet, 6280 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 021 370 4200, Fax:021 391 3063 Postal Address: Private Bag X 11217, E-mail: [email protected] Johannesburg - GP Nelspruit, 1200 Postal Address: n/a Tel: 011-333 3724, Fax:011-337 8189 Physical Address: No 3 Marloth Street, Physical Address: 1st Avenue, East Ridge, Mitchells E-mail: [email protected] Nelspruit, 1200 Plein Postal Address: Private Bag X 14, Johannesburg, 2000 Witbank (Vosman) - MP George - WC Physical Address: 94 Pritchard Street, 13th Floor, Tel: 013 - 752 2755, Tel: 044-802 4200, Fax:044-802 4202 Schreiner Chambers, Johannesburg, 2000 Fax: 013 752 3657 or 086 754 2479 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Postal Address: Private Bag X6586, Pretoria - GP Postal Address: Private Bag X 11217, George, 6530 Tel: 012 323 0760, Fax:012 323 9566 Nelspruit, 1200 Physical Address: Cnr Cathedral & Cradock Street, E-mail: [email protected] Physical Address: Mathew Phosa Drive, Batleur Park Building, George, 6530 Postal Address: Private Bag X 8, Pretoria, 0001 Vosman (opposite new mall) Physical Address: 4th Floor, Die Meent Building, c/o Durban – KZN Thabo Sehume* & Pretorius Streets Tel: 031-310 6500, Fax:031-305 4130 *Andries Street was renamed Thabo Sehume Street Polokwane - LP E-mail: [email protected] by Tshwane Council in March 2012. Tel: 015 291 1730 / 015 817 1200, Postal Address: Private Bag x 54353, Fax:015 291 1599/2762 Durban, 4000 Palm Ridge - GP E-mail: [email protected] Physical Address: 143 Grove Street, 15th Floor Tel: 010 232 2097, Fax: Postal Address: Private Bag X 9320, Polokwane, 0700 Maritime House, Durban, 4001 E-mail: [email protected] Physical Address: Wyndom Park Building, Postal Address: Private Bag X5, Welkom, 9460 23 Rabie Street, Polokwane, 0700 Newcastle - KZN Physical Address: Magistrate Court, c/o Heerden & Tel: 034-326 4932, Fax:034-326 4923 Buiten Str, Welkom, 9460 Sibasa - LP E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 015 960 1410, Fax: N/A Postal Address: Private Bag X 6610, Kimberley -NC E-mail: [email protected] Newcastle, 2940 Tel: 053-833 1019/63, Fax: 053-833 1062/69 Postal Address: N/A Physical Address: 43 Harding Street , E-mail: [email protected] Physical Address: Thohoyandou Magistrate Court Newcastle, 2940 Postal Address: Private Bag X 6071, Kimberley, 8300 www.justice.gov.za @DOJCD_ZA at DOJ&CD) at DOJCD .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shang Yang 商鞅 and Legalist 法家 Reform in the Ancient Chinese State of Qin 秦
    SHANG YANG 商鞅 AND LEGALIST 法家 REFORM IN THE ANCIENT CHINESE STATE OF QIN 秦 Daniel HAITAS Abstract Legalism has played a major role in the history of the Chinese legal and governmental tradition. One of the major exponents and formulators of this school of thought in ancient times was Shang Yang, an official in the state of Qin. Shang Yang oversaw a program of law reform in Qin in such areas as criminal law and the economic life of the country which aimed to strengthen the power of the state. This can be said to have had long term consequences for both Chinese and world history, in that the strengthening and reorganization of Qin along the lines of Legalist principles helped lead to its gaining preeminence amongst the other states vying for influence in the Warring States period, ultimately leading to the unification of China under the rule of the Qin dynasty. Keywords: Shang Yang, Legalism, law reform, Qin state, criminal law, economic regulation. that would be known among the general population, which included a system of strict punishments to be 1. Introduction applied equally to all. Additionally, he implemented Throughout much of the history of the Chinese reforms that favoured agriculture at the expense of legal and governmental tradition, two different schools commerce. of thought have been portrayed as competing and This study particularly draws on the Book of Lord coexisting at the same time; these are the Legalists 法 Shang 商君書, the earliest surviving and foundational 1 家 and the Confucians 儒家 . Both sought to maintain text of the Legalist school whose authorship is 7 social order, yet differed in the primary methods attributed to Shang Yang .
    [Show full text]
  • Stability and Development in Canon Law and the Case of "Definitive" Teaching
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2001 Stability and Development in Canon Law and the Case of "Definitive" Teaching Ladislas M. Örsy Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Vol. 76 Notre Dame Law Review, Page 865 (2001). Reprinted with permission. © Notre Dame Law Review, University of Notre Dame. This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/569 76 Notre Dame L. Rev. 865-879 (2001) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Religion Law Commons STABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT IN CANON LAW AND THE CASE OF "DEFINITIVE" TEACHING Ladislas Orsy, SJ!:~ The beginning of knowledge is wonder, wonder provoked by a puzzle whose pieces do not seem to fit together. We do have such an on-going puzzle in canon law; it is the prima facie conflict between the demand of stability and the imperative of development. Stability is an essential quality of any good legal system because a community's lav{s are an expression of its identity, and there is no identity without permanency. Many times we hear in the United States that we are a country held together by our laws. Although the statement cannot be the full truth, it is obvious that if our laws ever lost their stability, the nation's identity would be imperiled. In a relig­ ious community where the source of its identity is in the common memory of a divine revelation, the demand for stability is even stronger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Interests of the Child Are of Paramount
    WHERE TO FIND THE FAMILY ADVOCATE IN YOUR AREA: ISSUED 2018 ENGLISH National Office Sibasa Mthatha Adv. C.J Maree Northern Cape George Adv. Petunia Seabi-Mathope Adv. R.D. Ramanenzhe Adv. M.S. Van Pletzen (Senior Family Advocate) Kimberley – Provincial Office Adv. J. Gerber Chief Family Advocate (Family Advocate) (Senior Family Advocate) Tel: 012 323 0760, Fax: 012 323 9566 Adv. P.M Molokwane (Senior Family Advocate) Ms C. Molai (Secretary to the Chief Tel: 015 960 1410 Tel: 047 532 3998, Pretoria [email protected] (Acting Principal Family Advocate) Tel: 044 802 4200, Family Advocate) [email protected] Fax: 047 532 5337 Postal Address: Private Bag X 88, (Senior Family Advocate) Fax: 044 802 4202 OFFICE OF THE FAMILY ADVOCATE Tel: 012 357 8022 Postal Address: Private Bag X 5005 [email protected] Pretoria, 0001. Tel: 053 833 1019/63, [email protected] Fax: 012 357 8043 Thohoyandou 0950. Physical Address: Postal Address: Private Bag X 5255 Physical Address: 4th Floor, Centre Fax: 053 833 1062/69 Postal Address: Private Bag X 6586, [email protected] Thohoyandou Magistrate Court Mthatha 5099. Physical Address: 6th Walk Building, C/o Thabo Sehume [email protected] George, 6530. Physical Address: Postal Address: Private Bag X 6071, THE BEST INTERESTS Postal Address: Private Bag X 81 Floor, Manpower Building, C/o & Pretorius Streets , Pretoria, 0001 Cnr Cradock & Cathedral Street, Pretoria 0001. Physical Address: Mpumalanga Elliot and Madeira Street, Kimberley, 8300. Physical Address: Bateleur Park Building, George, 329 Pretorius Street, Momentum Nelspruit – Provincial Office Mthatha, 5100 Soshanguve 5th Floor, New Public Building OF THE CHILD ARE Building, West Tower, Pretoria Adv.
    [Show full text]
  • Factless Jurisprudence
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Summer 2003 Factless Jurisprudence Darren Lenard Hutchinson University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Darren Lenard Hutchinson, Factless Jurisprudence, 34 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 615 (2003), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/393 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTLESS JURISPRUDENCE* by Darren Lenard Hutchinson** I. INTRODUCTION Professor Terry Smith has written a very important work on the inadequacy of juridical approaches to antidiscrimination law in the context of Title VII litigation.' Smith argues that the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII can serve more broadly as a mechanism for protecting workers of color from prohibited racial discrimination.2 Smith contends that contemporary equality jurisprudence, however, impedes the protective scope of the anti-retaliation provision because courts fail to appreciate the broader context of racial antag- onism in which persons of color live.3 Particularly,
    [Show full text]
  • Han Fei and the Han Feizi
    Introduction: Han Fei and the Han Feizi Paul R. Goldin Han Fei 韓非 was the name of a proli fi c Chinese philosopher who (according to the scanty records available to us) was executed on trumped up charges in 233 B.C.E. Han Feizi 韓非子, meaning Master Han Fei , is the name of the book purported to contain his writings. In this volume, we distinguish rigorously between Han Fei (the man) and Han Feizi (the book) for two main reasons. First, the authenticity of the Han Feizi —or at least of parts of it—has long been doubted (the best studies remain Lundahl 1992 and Zheng Liangshu 1993 ) . This issue will be revisited below; for now, suffi ce to it to say that although the contributors to this volume accept the bulk of it as genuine, one cannot simply assume that Han Fei was the author of everything in the Han Feizi . Indeed, there is a memorial explic- itly attributed to Han Fei’s rival Li Si 李斯 (ca. 280–208 B.C.E.) in the pages of the Han Feizi ( Chen Qiyou 陳奇猷 2000 : 1.2.42–47); some scholars fear that other material in the text might also be the work of people other than Han Fei. Second, and no less importantly, even if Han Fei is responsible for the lion’s share of the extant Han Feizi , a reader must be careful not to identify the philosophy of Han Fei himself with the philosophy (or philosophies) advanced in the Han Feizi , as though these were necessarily the same thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fa [1]: Did Its Meaning Change in Chinese Philosophy? Some Remarks on Fa in Confucianism and Legalism
    ASIAN AND AFRICAN STUDIES, 70, 2001, 1, 44-55 FA [1]: DID ITS MEANING CHANGE IN CHINESE PHILOSOPHY? SOME REMARKS ON FA IN CONFUCIANISM AND LEGALISM Jana B enická Department of the Languages and Cultures of the Countries of East Asia, Faculty of Philosophy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia The aim of this article is to briefly analyse the use of the character fa in early Chinese philosophical texts and in the works of so-called Legalists, and give some justifications for the claim that the meaning of the character did not simply change from ‘standard’, ‘to mod­ el’ in the texts of the Confucians into the meaning ‘law’ in the intentions of legal positivism, as it is often interpreted in the books on Chinese philosophy. First of all I want to say that the primary impulse for writing this essay was an article by Chad Hansen: Fa (Standards:Laws) and Meaning Changes in Chi­ nese Philosophy j 1 published a few years ago. In his paper he treats the problem of the meaning changes of Chinese characters. He says: “The orthodoxy is that Chinese characters (1) have more meanings and (2) change meanings more fre­ quently than words of other languages.”2 Than he gives an example of fa (standards:laws), saying that the usual view is that this character means stan­ dard or to model for early Confucians, Mohists, and Daoists, but for those called Legalists (and perhaps for Xunzi [2] (fl. 298-238 B.C.))3 it means laws. H ansen, Chad. Fa (Standards:Laws) and Meaning Changes in Chinese Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilitarianism for a Broken Future
    Utilitarianism for a broken future. Tim Mulgan, University of St Andrews, [email protected] November 2010 for the Club of Amsterdam Philosophers have a collaborative relationship with our own and resources beyond these minimum requirements. By con- history. We work within traditions of thought that emphasise trast, a broken world lacks favourable conditions. Natural re- some questions, problems, and methods rather than others. I sources are insufficient to meet the basic needs of the popula- work in the liberal utilitarian tradition, associated most fa- tion – perhaps due to inadequate supplies of food and drinka- mously with Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and Henry ble water. A broken world cannot feed itself, and the resources Sidgwick. This tradition places human well-being centre of the earth cannot support all human beings. The climate is stage. Utilitarians judge everything – actions, moral codes, very unpredictable, and extreme weather events are common. political and legal institutions, and even beliefs – by its impact Each generation is worse-off than the last, and our affluent on human flourishing. Utilitarianism is also completely impar- way of life is no longer an option. Within this harsh global tial. As Bentham put it, ‘each is to count for one, and none for context, some areas are more broken than others. Indeed, some more than one’. Utilitarians count all human happiness equal- are uninhabitable by human beings. ly, wherever and whenever it occurs.1 This is not our world. Humanity currently has the resources to My recent work has focused on the demands of utilitarianism, meet everyone's needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Judicial Conduct
    Code of Judicial Conduct WASHINGTON STATE CODE OF JUCIAIL CONDUCT (CJC) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE SCOPE APPLICATION TERMINOLOGY CANON 1 A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD AND PROMOTE THE INDEPENDENCE, INTEGRITY, AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY, AND SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY. RULE 1.1 Compliance with the Law RULE 1.2 Promoting Confidence in the Judiciary RULE 1.3 Avoiding Abuse of the Prestige of Judicial Office CANON 2 A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY, COMPETENTLY, AND DILIGENTLY. RULE 2.1 Giving Precedence to the Duties of Judicial Office RULE 2.2 Impartiality and Fairness RULE 2.3 Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment RULE 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct RULE 2.5 Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation RULE 2.6 Ensuring the Right To Be Heard RULE 2.7 Responsibility To Decide RULE 2.8 Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors RULE 2.9 Ex Parte Communications RULE 2.10 Judicial Statements on Pending and Impending Cases RULE 2.11 Disqualification RULE 2.12 Supervisory Duties RULE 2.13 Administrative Appointments RULE 2.14 Disability and Impairment RULE 2.15 Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct RULE 2.16 Cooperation with Disciplinary Authorities CANON 3 A JUDGE SHALL CONDUCT THE JUDGE?S PERSONAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OF JUDICIAL OFFICE. RULE 3.1 Extrajudicial Activities in General RULE 3.2 Appearances before Governmental Bodies and Consultation with Government Officials RULE 3.3 Testifying as Character Witness
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy 302: Plato and Aristotle Course Description This Course
    Philosophy 302: Plato and Aristotle Course Description This course surveys the essential content of the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle and considers more briefly some of the earlier thinkers whose ideas form the immediate context for their works. We will begin with dialogues in which Plato's is thought to give a reasonable accurate depiction of his mentor Socrates, and will focus on the ethical theses defended in these works and on the standards for knowledge presupposed by them. We will then observe how these theses and standards, in combination with certain ideas and problems from pre-Socratic thought, lead Plato to develop the first philosophical system: an integrated set of ideas about the fundamental nature of reality, man, knowledge, and value. We will then turn to Aristotle’s formulation of the principles of logic and the structure of science. Finally, we will study Aristotle's own philosophical system, with a focus on the ways in which it is similar to and different from Plato's. Instructor and Course Information Instructor: Gregory Salmieri ([email protected], 412-576-2990) Meetings: Friday 11:30am – 2:30pm, Murray Hall 115 Required Books Reeve (tr.), Plato: Republic, Hackett (ISBN-10: 0872207366, ISBN-13: 978-0872207363). [Amazon] [Barnes and Noble] Irwin and Fine (tr.), Aristotle: Selections (ISBN-10: 0915145677, ISBN-13: 978-0915145676). [Amazon] [Barnes and Noble] Adamson, Classical Philosophy, Oxford University Press (ISBN-10: 0199674531, ISBN-13: 978- 0199674534). [Amazon] [Barnes and Noble] Additional readings available online. Grading There will be ten quizzes over the course of the semester, administered through Sakai, which will be collectively worth 20% of the grade, two papers each worth 30% of the grade, and a final exam worth 20%.
    [Show full text]
  • Han Fei and Justice*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Volume 9, No. 4 20 Han Fei and Justice* Henrique SCHNEIDER Universität Graz, Austria Abstract: Justice in an abstract sense (or, establishing just outcomes) is one of the most important goals of any legal system. For Han Fei, on the other hand, justice did not seem worthy of a meaningful consideration within framework, which focused on the effectiveness and efficiency of the state aiming at increasing the power and/or stability of the state (and its ruler). However, this paper claims that there is a proposition to be made: Although Han Fei was not concerned with justice, establishing just outcomes was equally fundamental for the functioning of the system proposed by him as its inherent stability. Key Words: Philosophy, Political System, Qin, Justice, Dao * The author gratefully acknowledges the insightful comments given by Al Martinich, Yang Xiao, and Hui-chieh Loy. Cambridge Journal of China Studies 21 Fundamenta justitiæ sunt, ut ne cui noceatur, deinde ut communi utilitatiserviatur. (The foundations of justice are that no one shall suffer wrong; then, that the public good be promoted.) Cicero, De Officiis, I. 10. It’s a very heterogenic group; it even seems too disparate to be brought together: legal philosophy, justice, Han Fei, and (some) comparative philosophy. Yet, there is an intuition of justice that merits some thought within legal philosophy. Would this entail that Han Fei 1, as a philosopher thinking about legality, had justice in mind, as well? This paper aims to establish what justice means in the philosophy of Han Fei.
    [Show full text]
  • China United Ying Zheng Was the Son of Zichu, a Prince of the State of Qin
    During this turbulent time of Chinese history, building a united Name nation was a farfetched idea. But one man took up the challenge and succeeded. That remarkable man was Ying Zheng (259 B.C. - 210 B.C.). He united China in 221 B.C. China United Ying Zheng was the son of Zichu, a prince of the State of Qin. As was the custom of the time, the heads of the seven strongest By Vickie Chao city-states of the Warring States Period often held each other's sons as hostages. The concept behind this idea was that nobody would In the beginning, China was never a united want to rush into wars unless they had no regard for their own country. For a long while, the landscape was offspring. Zichu was the hostage in the State of Zhao. He was dotted with hundreds of city-states. Sometimes, miserable there. He wanted to go back to his own country, but he the heads of the smaller city-states would swear could not. One day, he had a chance encounter with a rich merchant allegiance to the head of the biggest, strongest named Lu Buwei. The two struck up a conversation, and Lu Buwei city-state. Sometimes, they would not. During was very impressed by the prince. He decided to help Zichu to this chaotic period of time, wars were very become the next Qin emperor. Using his personal wealth and common. Around the 11th century B.C., the State connection, Lu Buwei persuaded the childless Madam Hua Yang to of Zhou became a dominant powerhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Han Fei As “Social Scientist”: a Case-Study in “Historical Correspondence”
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 4, No. 1 (2013): 90-102 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org READING HAN FEI AS “SOCIAL SCIENTIST”: A CASE-STUDY IN “HISTORICAL CORRESPONDENCE” HENRIQUE SCHNEIDER ABSTRACT: Han Fei was one of the main proponents of Legalism in Qin-era China. Although his works are mostly read from a historic perspective, the aim of this paper is to advance an interpretation of Han Fei as a “social scientist”. The social sciences are the fields of academic scholarship that study society and its institutions as a consequence of human behavior. Methodologically, social sciences combine abstract approaches in model- building with empiric investigations, seeking to prove the functioning of the models. In a third step, social sciences also aim at providing policy advice. Han Fei can be read as operating similarly. First, he builds a model of the nature of men, the state, and its interconnections, and then he uses history as empiric ground to prove his models. Again, after studying society as a “raw fact”, Han Fei develops models on how to deal with “society”. This article examines the “social scientific” inclinations of Han Fei by re-reading Chapter 49 of his book and applying an analysis in “historical correspondence”. This article serves as a case-study in this new type of analysis that can prove fruitful for the advancement of comparative philosophy. Keywords: Han Fei, Social Science, Qin, Chinese Legalism, Philosophy of Law 1. INTRODUCTION Han Fei (韓非, 280? – 233 b.c.e.) was one of the main proponents of Legalism in Qin-era China.
    [Show full text]