DOCSLIB.ORG

INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT & NATIVE PLANTINGS at 47

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT & NATIVE PLANTINGS at 47 NOTICE OF INTENT APPLICATION INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT & NATIVE PLANTINGS At 47 SQUAM ROAD OCTOBER 2019 Prepared For ELI ZABAR 20 Mary Ann Drive • Nantucket, MA 02554 508-825-5053 • www.NantucketEngineer.com Town and County of Nantucket, MA October 16, 2019 Locus Map 1" = 287 ft Property Information Property ID 13 22 Location 47 SQUAM RD Owner ZABAR ELI MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT Town and County of Nantucket, MA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map. Geometry updated 11/13/2018 Data updated 11/19/2018 October 18, 2019 Ms. Ashley Erisman, Chair Nantucket Conservation Commission 2 Bathing Beach Road Nantucket, MA 02554 Re: Notice of Intent 47 Squam Road Map 13 Parcel 22 Dear Ms. Erisman: On behalf of the property owner, Eli Zabar, Nantucket Engineering & Survey, P.C. is submitting this Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Nantucket Conservation Commission for proposed activities within the Buffer Zone and Bordering Vegetated Wetland at the above referenced property (the “Site”) in Nantucket, Massachusetts. Proposed activities at the Site consist of the mechanical removal of invasive species, native plantings and relocation of a fence from within the resource area. Attached are permit drawings, including plans showing a site locus, existing conditions including resource area locations, and proposed work areas. A completed WPA Form 3 – Notice of Intent is attached along with the NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form including checks for $42.50, $67.50, $25 and $200 to cover the WPA filing fee, Nantucket Wetland by-law fee and the Nantucket Expert Review fee. Also included is a check for $335.10 to the Inquirer & Mirror for publication of the notice of the public hearing. A waiver is required from the Town of Nantucket Bylaw Chapter 136 for the proposed project to allow the work within the 25-foot buffer zone and resource area. Notification of this NOI filing was provided to all abutting property owners by certified mail. This property owner listing was obtained from the Town of Nantucket Assessor’s office. Documentation of the notification is provided including a copy of the notification letter, the property owner listing and certified mail receipts. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is approximately 1-acre in size and is located on the northeast end of Nantucket Island. The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling served by on-site wells, and a septic system. The Wetland Resource Areas on-site subject to jurisdiction of the Commission are a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, and the respective Buffer Zones. The currently shown boundaries in the southern portion of the property were delineated by Brian Madden of LEC, with the associated field data forms included with this application. 20 Mary Ann Drive • Nantucket, MA 02554 508-825-5053 • www.NantucketEngineer.com 2 A review of the August 1, 2017 "Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas", prepared by the Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP), indicates that the work area is within the known range of state listed rare wildlife species defined by the Estimated Habitat mapping. WORK DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes to mechanically remove invasive species from throughout the property, primarily fox grape and bush honeysuckle. The removed plants will be properly disposed of at the bin at the landfill for that purpose. The native plants selected from the attached list will be installed, with all disturbed areas will be covered with a minimum of 6” of topsoil and planted with grass seed or mulch. WAIVER REQUEST A waiver is required from Section 3.02.B.1 to allow the work within the 25-foot buffer zone and resource area. Disturbed areas will be covered with topsoil and then be planted with Cape Cod Premium Grass Seed Mix. Waivers from the By-law can be granted for a number of reasons including: • Chapter 1.03 F.3.c The Commission may grant a waiver from these regulations when the Commission finds that a project will provide a long-term net benefit/improvement to the resource area, provided any adverse effects are minimized by carefully considered conditions. However, no such project may be permitted which could have an adverse effect on rare wildlife species. The removal of invasive species and planting of native species will improve the habitat value of the area. The proposed project will not have any adverse impact to the interests protected in the resource area by the Commission. CONCLUSION The proposed project will not result in an adverse impact on the areas or the interests protected by the Commission including flood control, erosion control, storm damage prevention, prevention of pollution, wildlife, and wetland scenic views. I plan to attend the Public Hearings for this application to address any questions, comments or concerns that the Commission may have. Sincerely, Arthur D. Gasbarro, PE, PLS Cc: MassDEP Eli Zabar Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 – Notice of Intent Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 NANTUCKET And the Town of Nantucket Wetlands Protection Bylaw 136 City/Town A. General Information 1. Project Location (Note: electronic filers will click on button to locate project site): 47 Squam Road Nantucket 02554 a. Street Address b. City/Town c. Zip Code 41d18’50.0”N 69d59’15.9” Latitude and Longitude: d. Latitude e. Longitude 13 22 f. Assessors Map/Plat Number g. Parcel /Lot Number 2. Applicant: Eli Zabar a. First Name b. Last Name c. Organization 52 East 92nd Street d. Street Address New York NY 10128 e. City/Town f. State g. Zip Code h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j. Email Address 3. Property owner (required if different from applicant): Check if more than one owner a. First Name b. Last Name c. Organization d. Street Address e. City/Town f. State g. Zip Code h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j. Email address 4. Representative (if any): Arthur D. Gasbarro, P.E., P.L.S. a. First Name b. Last Name Nantucket Engineering & Survey, PC c. Company 20 Mary Ann Drive d. Street Address Nantucket MA 02554 e. City/Town f. State g. Zip Code 508-825-5053 [email protected] h. Phone Number i. Fax Number j. Email address 5. Total WPA Fee Paid (from NOI Wetland Fee Transmittal Form): $110 + $25 + $200 $42.50 $67.50 + $25 + $200 a. Total Fee Paid b. State Fee Paid c. City/Town Fee Paid wpaform3.doc • rev. 02/21/08 Page 1 of 8 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Provided by MassDEP: Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands MassDEP File Number WPA Form 3 – Notice of Intent Document Transaction Number Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act M.G.L. c. 131, §40 NANTUCKET And the Town of Nantucket Wetlands Protection Bylaw 136 City/Town A. General Information (continued) 6. General Project Description: The Applicant proposes to manage invasive species and install native plantings within the 100-foot buffer zone and vegetated wetland resource area. A waiver is requested from the Nantucket Wetland Protection Regulations to allow the work to occur in the 25-foot buffer zone and resource area. 7a. Project Type Checklist: 1. Single Family Home 2. Residential Subdivision 3. Limited Project Driveway Crossing 4. Commercial/Industrial 5. Dock/Pier 6. Utilities 7. Coastal Engineering Structure 8. Agriculture (e.g., cranberries, forestry) 9. Transportation 10. Other 7b. Is any portion of the proposed activity eligible to be treated as a limited project subject to 310 CMR 10.24 (coastal) or 310 CMR 10.53 (inland)? 1. Yes No If yes, describe which limited project applies to this project: 2. Limited Project 8. Property recorded at the Registry of Deeds for: NANTUCKET 14427 a. County b. Certificate # (if registered land) c. Book d. Page Number B. Buffer Zone & Resource Area Impacts (temporary & permanent) 1. Buffer Zone Only – Check if the project is located only in the Buffer Zone of a Bordering Vegetated Wetland, Inland Bank, or Coastal Resource Area. 2. Inland Resource Areas (see 310 CMR 10.54-10.58; if not applicable, go to Section B.3, Coastal Resource Areas). Check all that apply below. Attach narrative and any supporting documentation describing how the project will meet all performance standards for each of the resource areas altered, including standards requiring consideration of alternative project design or location. Resource Area Size of Proposed Alteration Proposed Replacement (if any) a. Bank 1. linear feet 2. linear feet b. Bordering Vegetated Est.2,000 +/- (invasive removal) Wetland 1. square feet 2. square feet c. Land Under 1. linear feet 2. linear feet Waterbodies and Waterways 3. cubic yards dredged wpaform3.doc • rev. 02/21/08 Page 2 of 8 October 2019 Why Choose Natives? Native vs. Non Native Plants RESOURCES Selecting Natives Will: Massachusetts Prohibited Plants List Native plants are species that are indigenous to the www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/agr/farm-products/plants/ island. Having grown and evolved here for thousands • Save Water —Native plants are adapted to the local massachusetts-prohibited-plant-list.html of years, native plants are well-adapted to living in climate and site conditions. Nantucket Invasive Plants List (Wetland Regulations) Nantucket’s coastal habitats and have formed nantucket-ma.gov/documentcenter/view/1008 • Save Time—Less maintenance is required with native complex and interdependent relationships with the plants once established. Native Plant Nurseries in MA/New England island’s wildlife. Some native plants are aggressive grownativemass.org/resources/nurseries growers, such as grape and scrub oak, but they are key • Reduce Pesticide Use—Native plants have developed Coastal Zone Landscaping dominant plants in local ecosystems.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Pollinator Paradise" Garden at Chatham Mills
    "Pollinator Paradise" Garden at Chatham Mills Created by Debbie Roos, North Carolina Cooperative Extension 206 species, 85% of them native to North Carolina More info at www.carolinapollinatorgarden.org Common Name Scientific Name Origin Perennial Flowers Yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Moonshine' NC Yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Paprika' NC Mexican giant hyssop Agastache mexicana 'Acapulco Orange' Mexico Anise hyssop Agastache x 'Blue Fortune' hybrid of U.S. native Mexican hyssop Agastache x 'Grape Nectar' Mexico Hummingbird mint Agastache x 'Red Happiness' southwest U.S. Licorice hyssop Agastache rupestris southwest U.S. Nodding onion Allium cernuum NC Dwarf indigo bush Amorpha herbacea NC Arkansas bluestar Amsonia hubrichtii Arkansas, Oklahoma Bluestar Amsonia tabernaemontana NC Tall anemone Anemone virginiana NC Eastern wild columbine Aquilegia canadensis NC Golden columbine Aquilegia chrysantha southwest U.S. Common leopardbane Arnica acaulis NC Swamp milkweed Asclepias incarnata NC Purple milkweed Asclepias purpurascens NC Common Name Scientific Name Origin Red milkweed Asclepias rubra NC Common milkweed Asclepias syriaca NC Butterfly weed Asclepias tuberosa NC Redring milkweed Asclepias variegata NC Whorled milkweed Asclepias verticillata NC Dwarf Tartarian aster Aster tataricus 'Jin Dai' exotic Wild indigo Baptisia x 'Carolina Moonlight' NC Wild indigo Baptisia x 'Purple Smoke' NC White wild indigo Baptisia alba NC Dwarf wild indigo Baptisia minor NC Downy wood mint Blephilia ciliata NC Decurrent false aster Boltonia decurrens central U.S. Bush's poppy mallow Callirhoe bushii central U.S. Fringed poppy mallow Callirhoe digitata central U.S. Prairie poppy mallow Callirhoe involucrata central U.S. Clustered poppy mallow Callirhoe triangulata NC Pink turtlehead Chelone lyonii NC Maryland golden aster Chrysopis mariana NC Field thistle Cirsium discolor NC Curlyheads Clematis ochroleuca NC Wild ageratum/mistflower Conoclinium coelestinum NC Palmleaf thoroughwort Conoclinium greggii southwest U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Landscapes of Maine a Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems
    Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Copyright © 2010 by the Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation 93 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the authors or the Maine Natural Areas Program, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Illustrations and photographs are used with permission and are copyright by the contributors. Images cannot be reproduced without expressed written consent of the contributor. ISBN 0-615-34739-4 To cite this document: Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine. Cover photo: Circumneutral Riverside Seep on the St. John River, Maine Printed and bound in Maine using recycled, chlorine-free paper Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 3 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation for the Conservation of Pityopsis Ruthii, an Endangered
    HORTSCIENCE 49(2):194–200. 2014. species listed under the ESA, has outlined recovery criteria for Ruth’s golden aster that highlight the most critical data gaps and Propagation for the Conservation of research needs [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser- vice (USFWS), 1992]. The most recent re- Pityopsis ruthii, an Endangered Species view of the species status cites a continuing need for better ex situ conservation efforts from the Southeastern United States and additional research focused on restora- tion of Ruth’s golden aster in suitable habitat Phillip A. Wadl1 (USFWS, 2012). Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Previous ex situ conservation efforts for 2505 E.J. Chapman Drive, 370 Plant Biotechnology Building, Knoxville, Ruth’s golden aster have been focused en- tirely on long-term seed storage (USFWS, TN 37996 2012). Provided seeds are available and Timothy A. Rinehart germinate readily, seed-based methods are often the most efficient means for ex situ Thad Cochran Southern Horticulture Research Laboratory, U.S. Department conservation (Pence, 2011). However, wild- of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 810 Highway 26 collected Ruth’s golden aster seeds often West, Poplarville, MS 39470 exhibit poor germination and produce seed- lings with low vigor (Clebsch and Sloan, Adam J. Dattilo 1993; Cruzan, 2001; Farmer, 1977; White, Biological Compliance, Tennessee Valley Authority, West Tower 11C-K, 400 1977). To overcome the limitations of prop- West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, TN 37902 agating solely with seed and to provide increased flexibility in ex situ conservation Mark Pistrang efforts, an in vitro propagation protocol was Cherokee National Forest, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Leaved Panic-Grass, Coleataenia Longifolia
    Natural Heritage Long-leaved Panic-grass & Endangered Species Coleataenia longifolia (Torr.) Program Soreng ssp. longifolia www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Threatened Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Federal Status: None DESCRIPTION: Long-leaved Panic-grass (Coleataenia longifolia spp. longifolia) is a coarse, tufted perennial in the Grass family (Poaceae) that grows in clumps up to 1.5 m tall (~4.5 ft.). The panicle is either pyramidal or narrow, and 10 to 30 cm in height. It blooms from summer to fall, and has distinctive dark red inflorescences that may be slightly branched, ascending, or clumped in an ascending spike. The lance-ovoid spikelets are 1.8 to 3.5 mm long, borne on pedicels 0.5 to 1.5 mm in length. The narrow leaf blades grow primarily from the base of the plant, and are 20 to 40 cm on a mature specimen. Two subspecies of Coleataenia longifolia are known in Massachusetts: C. longifolia ssp. rigidula is widespread throughout the state, while C. longifolia spp. longifolia is rare and listed as Threatened. AIDS TO IDENTIFICATION: To positively identify panic-grasses, a technical manual must be used. A strongly compressed leaf sheath and short pedicels differentiate Long-leaved Panic-grass from other Coleataenia species. The two subspecies can be distinguished by differences in the length and Long-leaved Panic-grass inflorescence (top) and tufted growth form (bottom). Photos by Jennifer Garrett. pubescence of the ligules. In the rare Coleataenia Distribution in Massachusetts longifolia spp. longifolia, the ligule is 0.5 to 3 mm long 1995 - 2020 and finely pubescent, whereas in C.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Plants in Southern U.S. Proposed for Listing
    December 1984 Vol. IX No. 12 Department of interior. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Bulletin Endangered Species Program, Washington, D.C. 20240 Seven Plants in Southern U.S. Proposed for Listing Seven plants occurring in the south- ern United States were proposed by the Service during Novennber for listing as Endangered and Threatened species. These plants all face the possibility of extinction, but may benefit from protec- tion authorized by the Endangered Spe- cies Act. Pityopsis ruthii Pityopsis ruthii, a plant endemic to Polk County, Tennessee, was first col- lected In the late 1800s by Albert Ruth, a Knoxville botanist, near the Hlwassee River. Commonly referred to as Ruth's golden aster, this plant is a fibrous- rooted perennial that grows only in the soil-filled cracks of phyllite boulders in and adjacent to the Ocoee and Hlwas- see Rivers. Its stems range from one to three decimeters tall and bear long nar- row leaves covered with silvery hairs. Yellow flowers appear in a paniculate Inflorescence in late August and Sep- tember, and fruits develop a few weeks after the flowers fade. Pityopsis ruthii is being threatened by water quality degradation, toxic chemi- cal spills, and water flow regime manip- ulations. The two known populations of this species occur on short reaches of Pityopsis ruthii (Ruth's golden aster) rivers In which water regimes are con- trolled by upstream dams operated by river result in frequent high flow condi- the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). tions that naturally would occur only a Natural water flows in the Hlwassee few times per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Native Wildflowers of North Florida1 Jeffrey G
    Circular 1246 Common Native Wildflowers of North Florida1 Jeffrey G. Norcini2 The species in this publication are plants that are native to Much of the information about native wildflower habitat is the US and occur in Florida; most of them are considered from Guide to the Vascular Plants of the Florida Panhandle native to Florida. You might observe these species along the by A.F. Clewell (see references). roadside in North Florida, or while you’re taking a hike in a natural area. Information shown in the following tables References is based on personal observations and on information Bell, C.R. and B.J. Taylor. 1982. Florida Wild Flowers and obtained from the references listed in the next section. Roadside Plants. Chapel Hill, NC: Laurel Hill Press. Plant type, flowering, native habitat, and light requirement refer to North Florida conditions. Some of these species Clewell, A.F. 1985. Guide to the Vascular Plants of the may be available at local garden centers or retail nurseries, Florida Panhandle. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University especially those that specialize in native plants. Press. The species information presented refers primarily to plants Jones, S.B., Jr. and L.E. Foote. 1990. Gardening with Native as they occur in the wild. Wildflowers or cultivars obtained Wild Flowers. Portland, OR: Timber Press. through seed companies or at local garden centers may differ substantially in flowering season, appearance, site Native Nurseries, Tallahassee, FL. 1997. (pers. comm.). requirement, and pest susceptibility. In addition, plants derived from a local native population of a wildflower Phillips, H.R. 1985. Growing and Propagating Wild Flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Grasslands
    LONG ISLAND SOUND HABITAT RESTORATION INITIATIVE SECTION 4: COASTAL GRASSLANDS Technical Support for Coastal Habitat Restoration SECTION 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS COASTAL GRASSLANDS ..........................................................4-1 DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 4-1 Maritime Grasses..............................................................................................4-1 Sand Plains ......................................................................................................4-1 Hempstead Plains ............................................................................................4-2 Old Field Grasslands ........................................................................................4-3 VALUES AND FUNCTIONS ........................................................................... 4-3 STATUS AND TRENDS ................................................................................. 4-4 DEGRADED GRASSLANDS AND RESTORATION METHODS.............................. 4-6 SPECIFIC RESTORATION OBJECTIVES ........................................................... 4-7 RESTORATION SUCCESS AND MONITORING................................................. 4-8 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................... 4-9 LIST OF FIGURES SECTION 4 FIGURE 4-1. Newly Seeded Little Bluestem .......................................................4-1 FIGURE 4-2. Farm Field with Common Reed, Shrubs, and Invasive
    [Show full text]
  • Sericocarpus Caespitosus, Sp. Nov. Phytoneuron 2021-33: 1–33
    Nesom, G.L. 2021. Sericocarpus asteroides (Asteraceae: Astereae), rhizomatous and colonial, and Sericocarpus caespitosus, sp. nov. Phytoneuron 2021-33: 1–33. Published 5 July 2021. ISSN 2153 733X SERICOCARPUS ASTEROIDES (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE), RHIZOMATOUS AND COLONIAL, AND SERICOCARPUS CAESPITOSUS, SP. NOV. GUY L. NESOM Research Associate Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 [email protected] ABSTRACT Allopatric population systems of two growth forms comprise the eastern USA species traditionally identified as Sericocarpus asteroides. The typical form (the type collected by Peter Kalm in New Jersey), which produces slender, stoloniform rhizomes, occurs along the Atlantic coast from southern Maine into South Carolina. Sericocarpus caespitosus Nesom, sp. nov., without stoloniform rhizomes, occurs inland from western New York to coastal counties of Alabama and Florida. An epitype is designated for Conyza asteroides L., clearly showing the rhizomes; neotypes are designated for Aster leucanthemus Raf. and Aster conyzoides var. plantaginifolius Nutt. (both are synonyms of S. asteroides sensu stricto). Sericocarpus oregonensis (with stoloniform rhizomes) and S. californicus (without stoloniform rhizomes) are similar in morphological distinction and have geographically separate distributions –– a similar rationale (morphology and geography) justifies their treatment as separate species. Sericocarpus asteroides (L.) B.S.P. occurs widely through the eastern USA (Fig. 1). Over much of its range, plants produce a relatively short, thick, fibrous-rooted rhizome with short basal offsets arising from a short caudex. Short, thick, caudex branches may arise from growth of these offsets. Along the Atlantic seaboard, however, from southern Maine to South Carolina, in addition to the larger perennating rhizome, plants produce slender, scale-leaved, stoloniform rhizomes that may elongate laterally up to 15 centimeters –– a rooting plantlet is produced at the tip of these rhizomes (these features are shown in type collections–Figs.
    [Show full text]