DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, IN FOR THE YEARS 1773-1 828. VOLUME I. NEW-YORK: PUBLISHED BY T. MASON AND G. LANE, FOR THE METHODIST EPI8COPAL CHURCH, AT THE CONFERENCE OFFICE, 200 MULBERRY-STREEt. J. Collord, Printer. 1840. 268 Minutes for 1816. lively as I ever knew him to be. Yet, I he had the soldiers together who desired believe this kind of labour was too severe to flee from the wrath to come. How for a man of his advanced age in this hot lovingly and earnestly he would address climate ; and I am sorry to add, not only them ! and how fervently would he ad frqm my own thoughts, but also from the dress the Lord Jesus on their behalf! judgment of the above-mentioned medical These little meetings he considered as gentlemen, that it was one means of has dawnings of the gospel in the East. tening his sudden death. Yet while we Tuesday, May 3. This day God has view and deplore this conduct, as exem visited us with a most awful and afflictive plified in the case of our venerable leader, dispensation. Our highly esteemed and it is a standard of emulation, at which all venerable leader is taken from us. Dr. young ministers ought to aspire ; and even Coke is dead ! This morning he was our passengers confessed that Dr. Coke's found dead in his cabin. While we view conduct was a tacit reproof to all. The every circumstance of this most distress only way in which I can account for his ing visitation, we are led to wonder and unremitting labours, is this :—That as Asia adore. The event would have been less had so long occupied his serious attention, alarming had he been encircled by his and to send the gospel to so great a num friends, who might have heard his latest ber of immortal souls, who were in hea testimony, received his dying instructions, thenish darkness and superstition, was and obtained directions how to proceed in now the chief concern of his life ; as more the work of this great mission ; but these than once, since we came on board, he advantages were not enjoyed, and we are had told me, that if he had not succeeded now left to lament the departure of our in establishing the present mission, he be Elijah, and to tremble for the cause of lieved it would have broken his heart; but God. He is gone ! and he is gone to re having so clear a discovery of the will of ceive a crown of righteousness that fadeth God on the subject, he cast himself upon not away. His death, though a loss to us, his direction, fully persuaded that his way and to the cause of God, to himself is infi would be opened ; and having so far suc nite gain. Though sudden, his death was ceeded, he took it as a proof of the divine glorious : he died in the work of God, with approbation of the undertaking, and now his soul fired with an ardent desire and determined to spend and be spent in so zeal for the enlargement of his church, glorious a cause. And now, having made and the divine glory. For some time be a beginning, by translating and composing fore his death it appeared that he had no in Portuguese, he experienced great joy desire to live, but to see the gospel est*, in his soul ; and when he had composed a blished in Asia. He frequently observed, short sermon or prayer, he always read that he had given up his life to Asia ; and it to us with joy and gratitude. But it is astonishing with what assiduity he that which afforded him the greatest joy pursued his object. Though near sixty- • was, when in our prayer meetings we seven years of age, in a short time he ac sung his translation of our hymns into quired such a knowledge of the Portuguese Portuguese, and which (according to our language that he had written many sermons, judgment) were translated astonishingly and translated many hymns : this work he well. Among all these labours, our ever was engaged in but yesterday, and is now dear father enjoyed deep communion with enjoying his reward. Thus did he his Lord and Saviour; this we felt both " His body with his charge lay down, in our public and private meetings, when And cease at once to work and live." MINUTES TAKEN AT THE SEVERAL ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, FOB THE YEAR 1816. Quest. 1. Wh» are admitted on trial ? Cunningham, Absalom Hunt, James Sim- OHIO CONFERENCE. mons, John Tivis, Othniel Talbot, James Cornelius Springer, Samuel Hamilton, G. Leach, Matthew Mahan, Samuel Che- Andrew Monroe, Benj. Lawrence, Wm. nowith, John Kent — 13. Minutes for 1816. 2G9 TENNESSEE CONFERENCE. C. Harbison, John Scrips, Elijah Gen Lewis Garrett, John Seaton, John Hut try—7. chinson, Nathan Barnes, Dan'l M'Henry, SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE. Thomas Davis, John Bloom, Wm. Ster John W. Norton, John Simons, Wm. venson, Benjamin Proctor, Joseph Piggott, Kennedy, John Mote, Bryan Gause—5. Alex. Fleming, Josiah Daughtry, Philip Davis, John Smith — 14. VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE. Daniel Day, Thacker Muire, Allen R. Barnard, John T. Brame, David Brow- ZaccheusDowling, Zachariah Williams, der, Thomas Browder, Joshua Feather- Daniel Gartman, James Bellah, Samuel stone, John F. Wright, Ebenezer W. Harrison, Jesse Sinclair, Dan'l Christen- Ward, Benj. Stephens, James Reid —11. burv, Andrew Hammill, Tillman Snead, David Garretson — 10. BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. John Everhart, Henry Baker, Joha Childs, Robert Cadden, Bazil James Hanner, John Turner, Samuel Barry, Ro bert —6. Hooser, Russel Foster, George Burnett, Boyd William Peebles, Wm. H. Star, Samuel PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. Wells, John W. Boyd, Solomon Day, Rich'dW.Petherbridge, Jacob Moore — 2. Stephen Rowe, Williarn Richards, Thos. NEW-YORK CONFERENCE. Saunders— 13. Aaron Pierce, Sherman Minor, Josiah BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. Bowen, James Young, Heman Bangs, Joseph Carper, Morris Covert, Thomas Smith Dayton, Earl Bancroft, Phinehas Beaks, Mordecai Gosnell, George Brown, Doan— 8. , — James Taylor 6. NEW-ENGLAND CONFERENCE. PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. John Lord, Josiah A. Scarritt, Nathan Sinickson Tuff, John Creamer, Walters Paine, Salmon Winchester, Bradbury Burrows, Abraham Ketchum— 4. Clay, Joseph C. Pierce — 6. NEW-YORK CONFERENCE. GENESEE CONFERENCE. James Covel, David Barclay, Jeremiah James H. Harris, William Brown, M'Daniels, John Goodsel, Isaac Lent, Joshua Rogers, John Arnold, Peter Ba John Boyd, David Miller, Ibri Cannon, ker— 5. Isaac Hill, Zalmon Stewart, Horace Quest. 3. Who are admitted into Weston, John Lovejoy — 12. full connection ? NEW-ENGLAND CONFERENCE. OHIO CONFERENCE. Jeremiah Marsh, Moses Fifield, Daniel John Solomon, David Sharp, Samuel Plumley, Daniel Dorchester— 4. Brown, Olrver Carver, Jacob Hooper, GENESEE CONFERENCE. Sbadrach Ruark — 6. Daniel Sheperson, John Dempster, TENNESSEE CONFERENCE. Abraham Lippett, Joshua Beebee, Al- Hardy M. Cryer, Ivy Walke, John pheus Davis, Joseph M'Creary, George Schrader, John Manifee, William Strib- Peck, Isaac Grant, William Jones, Ebe- ling, Nicholas Norwood, Moses Ash- nezer Fairchild, John Byem, Thomas worth, Joshua Butcher, Peter James, M'Gee, George Ferguson — 13. Thomas Owen, Thomas Bailey, John Quest. 2. Who remain on trial t M'Gee, John S. Ford, Elisha Lott— 14. OHIO CONFERENCE. SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE. Lemuel Lane, Boroughs Westlake, Elijah Bird, David Hilliard, John Lane, Joseph Pownal, Sadosa Bacon, Henry John Murrow, Daniel Monaghan, West Baker, William P. Finley, Elijah Truitt, Williams, John M'Clendon, William Win- John Waterman, William Hunt, Russell ningham, Travis Owen, Aquila Leather- Bigelow, William Adams, Jabez Bow wood, William Collinsworth, John Scott, man, Henry B. Bascom— 13. Nicholas M'Intyre — 13. TENNESSEE CONFERENCE. VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. Josiah Patterson, George M'Nelly, Hugh A. M'Cain, James C. M'Aden, Nace Overall, Jacob Wbitesides, John Peyton Anderson, Waddell Johnson, Reu 270 Minutes for 1816. ben Ellis, Bowen Reynolds, William Daniel Monaghan,* Nicholas M'Intyre, Jones, Charles Moseley — 8. elect, West Williams,* John M'Clendon,* BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. William Winningham,* Travis Owen,* Aquila Leatherwood* — 28. Samuel P. V. Gillespie, John Bear, Samuel Davis, Richard Hunt, James VIRGINIA CONFERENCE. Sewell, Henry Padgett, Thomas Lar- Lewis Kimbell, Lewis Skidmore, John kins — 7. Doyle, Fletcher Harris, Elijah Sparks, Samuel B. White, Abraham Trail, Hugh PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. A. M'Cain,* James C. M'Aden,* Peyton William Preityman, Daniel Moore, Wil Anderson,* Reuben Ellis,* Bowen Rey liam Lummis, Edward Stout, Joseph nolds,* William Jones,* Charles Mose Rusling, William Ross, Henry Kunzel- ley*— 14. — man, Lott Warfield, Amos C. Moore 9. BALTIMORE CONFERENCE. NEW-YORK CONFERENCE. Caleb Leach, John Macklefresh, Tho Buel Good sell, Daniel Brayton, Charles mas C. Thornton, William C. Morrison, Northrop, William M. Stilwell, Daniel I. Thomas Kennerly, John Connelly, Zach- Wright, Eli Barnett, Samuel Eighmey, ariah Mitchell, Samuel P. V. Gillespie,* Moses Amedon— 8. John Bear,* Samuel Davis,* Richard Hunt,* Thomas Lar- NEW-ENGLAND CONFERENCE. Henry Padgett,* kins*— 13. Zenas Adams, Orin Roberts, Job Pratt, PHILADELPHIA CONFERENCE. Ezekiel W. Coffin, Bartholomew Othe- man, Walter Sleeper, Henry True, Elea- Phinehas Price, elect, Wm. Prettyman, zar Phelps — 8. elect, Daniel Moore, elect, Wm. Lum mis, elect, Edward Stout, elect, Joseph GENESEE CONFERENCE. Rusling, elect, Wm. Ross, elect, Henry Wyatt Chamberlin, John Griffin, James Kunzelman, elect, Amos C. Moore, elect, Hazen, Elias Bowen, William Cameron, John Potts, elect, Samuel Cox, elect, — J. William Barlow 6. John Goforth, elect — 12. Quest. 4. Who are the deacons ? NEW-YORK CONFERENCE. Those marked thus (*) were ordained this year. Thomas Thorp, Beardsley Northrop, OHIO CONFERENCE. Nicholas White, Buel Goodsell,* Daniel Brayton,* Charles Northrop,* William M. John Graham, Charles Waddel, Robert Stilwell,* Daniel I. Wright,* Eli Bar C. Hatton, John Dew, Francis Landrum, nett,* Samuel Eighmey,* Moses Ame John Solomon,* David Samuel Sharp,* don*— 11.
Recommended publications
  • The Form and Function of Methodist Autobiography

    The Form and Function of Methodist Autobiography

    The Form and Function of Methodist Autobiography Michael K. Turner I. INTRODUCTION Between 1778 and 1860 a large number of Methodist autobiographies were published in religious magazines, journals, and book formats in both the United States and England. While enjoying a large circulation, the autobiographies were originally intended for an audience consisting chiefly of ministers. The goal of these accounts were to educate preachers and, hence, work toward bringing them into conformity with one another. Instead, as the genre expanded in popularity, it became a vehicle of dissent. II. THE METHODIST NARRATIVE The narratives and autobiographical patterns crafted by nineteenth-century Methodists drew and expanded upon the model propagated by the denomination’s founder, John Wesley. From 1778 until his death in 17911 John Wesley published a series of personal accounts written by English Methodists in his monthly periodical, The Arminian Magazine. These accounts were formative in establishing religious biography as an integral part of Methodist devotion. Wesley created The Arminian Magazine as a response to Calvinist periodicals, particularly The Spiritual Magazine and The Gospel Magazine. The founding intention of this English magazine was, thus, to promote a belief in the universal availability of salvation. As such, Wesley sought to only include those elements in the magazine that contributed to the spreading of this doctrine. The journal, thus, was organized in a four- part format. The first section of the magazine consisted of theological tracts which defended the “grand Christian doctrine, ‘God willeth all men to be saved, and to come to 1 The periodical was published through 1797. It continued the practice of publishing these “accounts.” 2 the knowledge of truth.’”2 To meet this purpose, Wesley included in the periodical, carefully edited works of divines who looked, sounded, or could be made to look or sound like “Arminians.”3 The second part of the journal was a biographical account of a “holy” person.
  • Remembering Francis Asbury Erik Alsgaard the Rev

    Remembering Francis Asbury Erik Alsgaard the Rev

    FOR IN GOD ALL THINGS WERE CREATED: ALL THINGS HAVE BEEN CREATED THROUGH GOD AND FOR GOD. – COLOSSIANS 1:16 Baltimore-Washington UM Conference of The United Methodist Church • BecomingConnection fully alive in Christ and making a difference in a diverse and ever-changing world • www.bwcumc.org • Volume 27, Issue 04 • April 2016 Remembering Francis Asbury Erik Alsgaard The Rev. Emora Brannan speaks at the dedication of a new monument (tallest one, to his right) honoring Bishop Francis Asbury and others at Mt. Olivet Cemetery in Baltimore. On the platform are the Rev. Travis Knoll, left, pastor of Lovely Lane UMC, and Walter Tegeler, owner of the company that made the monument. By Erik Alsgaard Asbury knew popular American culture long before UMConnection Staff anyone else because of his extensive travels, Day said. His mission was to make the Gospel relevant to BMCR meets in ishop Francis Asbury was remembered as the everyone he met. One piece of American culture he “The Prophet of the Long Road” on the 200th abhorred was slavery; Asbury called it a “moral evil.” Baltimore anniversary of his death during worship at And yet, Asbury made accommodations for slave- Lovely Lane UMC and ceremonies at Mt. Olivet holding Methodists, mostly in the South, in order to By Melissa Lauber & Larry Hygh* BCemetery, both in Baltimore, on April 3. hold the church together, Day said. “This haunted him UMConnection Staff Asbury, an icon of Methodism from its start in the rest of his life.” Colonial America, arrived on these shores from England At the Christmas Conference of 1784, held in tanding before the 330 members of the in 1771 at the age of 26.
  • Holston Methodism

    Holston Methodism

    HOLSTON METHODISM REV. THOMAS STRINGFIELD. HOLSTON METHODISM FROM ITS ORIGIN TO THE PRESENT TIME. By R. N. PRICE. VOLUME III. From the Year 1824 to the Year 1844. Nashville, Tenn.; Dallas, Tex.: Publishing House of the M. E. Church, South. Smith & Lamar, Agents. 1908. Entered, according to Aet of Congress, in the year 190S, By R. N. Pkice, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. PREFACE. The tardiness with which the successive volumes of this work have been issued has evidently abated somewhat the interest of preachers and people in it; but this tardiness has grown out of circumstances which I have not been able to control. There is more official matter in this volume than in its predecessors, making it a little less racy than the oth- ers; but the official matter used is of considerable historic value. Thus while the volume is heavier than the others as to entertaining qualities, it is also heavier as to historic importance. The chapters on Stringfield, Fulton, Patton, Sevier, Brownlow, and the General Conference of 1844 are chapters of general interest and thrilling import, not on ac- count of ability in the writing, but on account of the in- trinsic value of the matter recorded. I owe my Church an explanation for dwelling so much at length upon the life of Senator Brownlow. It is my busi- ness to record history, not to invent it. A Methodist preach- er who lived as long as Brownlow did, was constantly be- fore the public, took an active part in theological and eccle- siastical controversies, was so gifted and was such a pro- digious laborer, must necessarily have made much history, which could not be ignored by an honest historian.
  • Copyright Holiness Data Ministry -- All Rights Are Reserved for This Digital Publication, and Duplication of This DVD by Any Means Is Forbidden

    Copyright Holiness Data Ministry -- All Rights Are Reserved for This Digital Publication, and Duplication of This DVD by Any Means Is Forbidden

    Copyright Holiness Data Ministry -- All Rights Are Reserved For This Digital Publication, And Duplication Of This DVD By Any Means Is Forbidden. Also, Copies Of Individual Files Must Be Made In Accordance With The Restrictions Of The B4UCopy.txt File On This Disc. AMERICAN METHODISM By M. L. Scudder With An Introduction By Rev. Joseph Cummings, President Of Wesleyan University Illustrated "Ye are chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people." S. S. Scranton & Co., Hartford, Connecticut Zeigler, McCurdy & Co., Cincinnati, Ohio; O. F. Gibbs, Chicago, Illinois; H. H. Bancroft & Co., San Francisco, California. 1867 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by S. S. Scranton & Co., In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Connecticut. * * * * * * * Digital Edition 07-26-09 By Holiness Data Ministry * * * * * * * CONTENTS Introduction Book Pictures 01 -- PRESENT STATE OF METHODISM -- Methodism Claims To Be Of God -- The Phenomena Of Its History -- Its Present Status -- Its Rapid Growth, Compared With The Primitive Church -- Statistical Proof Of Greatness -- English Methodism -- Its Numerical Strength -- A Religious Educator Of The Young -- Its Literature Among The People -- Its Missionary Work -- Beneficial Re-Action On The Domestic Church - - Its Moral Power On The Masses -- Maintains Its Evangelical Spirit -- American Methodism -- A Wonderful Religious Movement -- What The Centenary Year Has Shown, By Its Services, By Its Teachings, By Its Commemorative Offerings -- General Diffusion
  • Pennsylvania Female College in Harrisburg

    Pennsylvania Female College in Harrisburg

    Papers Relating to Harrisburg Women At first glance this section might appear to be papers written by women of Harrisburg – but in the English tradition the Christian name Beverly was employed for males. Accordingly, the first author, Beverly R. Waugh, was not a female – in fact he named his daughter Beverlina, which was then the accepted feminized form of the name. In truth, Beverly R. Waugh is the collector and not the author of the articles presented in the first paper. The material reproduced in this volume of The Chronicle has been selected from a scrapbook kept by Mr. Waugh during his tenure as principal of Pennsylvania Female College in Harrisburg. While the scrapbook likely remained in the possession of Mrs. Waugh until her death in 1908, no one can account for its whereabouts for almost 100 years. It was purchased by the conference archives last year from a Camp Hill antiques dealer, who had recently acquired it from a collector of local memorabilia – in whose Harrisburg attic it had been stored for some unknown period of time. Hidden between the lines of the articles is a most revealing picture of the place of females in mid nineteenth century America. Following the lead article that paints a broad picture, the remaining papers present in chronological order more detailed examinations of particular Harrisburg females and their Methodist involvements. Each is based on a document housed in the conference archives. Taken together they lead the reader on a journey through the eyes of area females from the days of the earliest circuit rider to the modern era.
  • It Has Long Been Observed That the Reason the Methodist Movement

    It Has Long Been Observed That the Reason the Methodist Movement

    .,.,..,.. r,r r ~ .: ·. ' Methodist History, 31:1 (October 1992) "THE ADVANTAGES OF LIBERTY": DEMOCRATIC THOUGHT IN THE FORMATION OF THE METHODIST PROTESTANT CHURCH RICK NUTT It has long been observed that the reason the Methodist movement proved overwhelmingly successful in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries was its concern for the commoner. With an emphasis on religious experience and intimate community among the believers, Methodism '. I became a mass movement. As a popular movement in the upper south and Middle Atlantic states, Methodism had appealed to the dispossessed of society. Its adherents in the TJnited States tended to come from the farms of the nation, from those who served the wealthy in town, or those serving on plantations in the south. These people felt unappreciated and ignored by those who held power in the institutions that governed their lives-including the church (notice, for example, how African-Americans in the south responded to Methodist and Baptist preaching). People suddenly felt new hope in their identity , a sense of value, and release from the strictures of society. The i' . church became a world with values and expectations radically at odds with ' those of the world outside its fellowship. Donald Mathews has observed that," ... whether or not a person was a member of the gentry and had fine Clothes and a position of worldly authority was not important because I these distinctions were based on ephemeral things. They were saying i . that the conventional distinctions of society were not authoritative for I them." 1 Francis As bury, although the undisputed authority in the Meth­ odist Episcopal Church, was a man of the people and realized the value of the church to the powerless, largely unchurched, masses.
  • Methodism and the Negotiation of Masculinity

    Methodism and the Negotiation of Masculinity

    SERVING TWO MASTERS: METHODISM AND THE NEGOTIATION OF MASCULINITY IN THE ANTEBELLUM SOUTH by CHARITY RAKESTRAW CARNEY A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Charity Rakestraw Carney 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the development of a distinct southern Methodist masculinity from the 1830s to the 1860s. More than a church history, this study explores the relationship between non-religious and religious society, the tensions inherent in to relationship, and the ethical questions that emerged from that tension. As Methodism evolved in the South, it took on regional social practices and affectations while also maintaining a denominational identity that opposed southern culture. Southern Methodists served two masters—the church and society— and both demanded obedience to divergent visions of masculinity and manhood. Although they rejected many manly pursuits, ministers adopted a proslavery ideology and patriarchal practices and reflected southern attitudes in their church doctrine and structure. My study argues that the ethical shift that occurred in the southern Methodist Church in the 1840s resulted from the dual demands of southern and denominational culture, which led them to construct their own vision of masculine identity. This study uses the Methodist Church as an example of the friction caused and questions raised by the intersection of gender, religion, and ethics in a constricted, patriarchal society. ii DEDICATION To my husband, Court Carney And to my grandparents, R.A. and Juanita Rakestraw iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is certainly a labor of love and required the support and encouragement of a number of people whose contributions and efforts I would like to recognize.
  • 378069 Tenaris Directive 10

    378069 Tenaris Directive 10

    Texas Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church 2012 Journal TEXAS ANNUAL ANNUAL TEXAS CONFERENCE TEXAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE of the United Methodist Church 2012 Journal A TEXAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE A-1 JOURNAL of THE Texas Annual Conference Of The UNITED METHODIST CHURCH South Central Jurisdiction Forty-third Session since Merger of the Gulf Coast and Texas Annual Conferences One Hundred and Seventy-Second since Organization Galveston Convention Center June 4 - 7, 2012 BISHOP JANICE RIGGLE HUIE - Bishop GAIL HARRELSON - Secretary RICHARD P. WHITE - Statistician ELIJAH STANSELL, JR. - Treasurer B. T. WILLIAMSON - Assistant to the Bishop Office of Communications - Editors 5215 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77002 A-2 TEXAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE Texas Annual Conference 2012 BISHOP JANICE RIGGLE HUIE Bishop of the Houston Area South Central Jurisdiction The United Methodist Church TEXAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE A-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Pages, Historical Summary and Photos A-1 I. Officers and Delegates of the Annual Conference B-1 II. Boards, Councils, Divisions, Commissions, Committees, Trustees, Lay Members C-1 III. Conference Directory D-1 IV. Daily Proceedings E-1 V. Resolutions and Mission Statements F-1 VI. Business of the Annual Conference G-1 VII. Appointments H-1 VIII. Conference Structure and Standing Rules I-1 IX. Reports as Ordered by Annual Conference J-1 X. Memoirs K-1 XI. Pastoral Records L-1 XII. Other Records M-1 XIII. Statistical Tables N-1 XIV. Index O-1 A-4 TEXAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE TEXAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE HISTORICAL SUMMARY The earliest Methodist activity within the bounds of present day Texas occurred in northeastern Texas in the settlements of immigrants along the Red and Sulfur Rivers and their tributaries.
  • MH-2004-July-Discovery.Pdf (1.312Mb)

    MH-2004-July-Discovery.Pdf (1.312Mb)

    Methodist Hist01y, 42:2 (July 2004) DISCOVERY Edited by ROBERT DREW SIMPSON Robert Richford Roberts (1778-1843) - "The Log Cabin" Bishop The United Methodist General Commission on Archives and History possesses a treasure trove of priceless artifacts. Among the most popular items in the collection is George Whitefield's thumb, the original of John Wesley's death mask, and Bishop Francis Asbury's watch, his glasses, and his comb. However, there are many other artifacts which represent the world-wide reach of United Methodism. Personally, I especially delight in artifacts connected with Bishop Robert Roberts, affectionately known as the Log Cabin Bishop. In its vault the Commission holds Roberts' rocking chair (which he inay have made himself), two sets of his saddlebags, and his watch. These items date from the early 1800s. When I see them, I am prompted to remember some of the stories about this unusual circuit- riding bishop. Bishop Roberts was born in Frederick County, Maryland in 1778. His family moved over the mountains to the Ligonier Valley in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. They lived in the woods with little contact with the outside world until a Methodist circuit rider reached their settlement and converted Roberts, his mother, and sister to the Methodist understanding of Christian faith. When he embraced the faith, Roberts was fifteen years old. In 1795, young Roberts moved on to Mercer County, living off the land and sleeping under the trees for shelter. In 1800 he was given a license to preach. What expectation could there possibly be for such a ho1nespun character? But he was immensely successful, and was named Presiding Elder of the Schuylkill District which included Philadelphia.
  • Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church For

    Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church For

    MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, IN FOR THE YEARS 1773-1 828. VOLUME I. NEW-YORK: PUBLISHED BY T. MASON AND G. LANE, FOR THE METHODIST EPI8COPAL CHURCH, AT THE CONFERENCE OFFICE, 200 MULBERRY-STREEt. J. Collord, Printer. 1840. 448 Minutes for 1825. Lyons Creek, Isaac B. Smith. Bav Qdintik Dist. Wm. Case, P. EMer. Ancaster, David Culp. Smith's Creek, David Breckenridge. Long Point, D. Shepardson,T. Sovereign. Belville, Samuel Belton. Westminster, George Ferguson. Hallowell, Franklin Metcalf, Jacob Pool. Thames, Jos. Jackson, Joseph Messmore. Bay Quintie, John Ryerson, Wm. Slater. St. Clair, William Griffes. Augusta, Wyatt Chamberlin, P. Smith. London, Edmund Stoney. Perth, Ezra Healey. Dumfries, Robert Corson. Rideau, David Wright. Young-street and York, Wm. H. Williams, Cornwall, Solomon Waldron. Joseph Atwood. Attawa, George Bissell. New Settlements, Rowland Heyland. _, „., , , ... 15' and our next Grand River mission, Alvin Torry. Quest- ™heTe befenheldfall? Henry Ryan, missionary to ChippeWay Conference and Grand River Falls, and the newdesti- September 14, 1825, at Fifty Mile Creek, tute settlements in those parts. township of Saltfleet, Upper Canada. GENERAL RECAPITULATION. Whites. Coloured. Indians. Total. Ohio Conference 30348 193 36541 Kentucky Conference 21552 3139 24691 Missouri Conference 11353 420 11773 Tennessee Conference 22527 2982 25509 Mississippi Conference - - • - - 7213 1796 9009 South Carolina Conference 24909 14736 39645 Virginia Conference 21134 6964 28098 Baltimore Conference 29137 9179 38316 Philadelphia Conference 27890 7920 35810 New- York Conference 26819 376 27195 New-England Conference 21398 227 21625 Genesee Conference 24075 86 24161 Canada Conference ...... 6072 22 56 6150 Total this year - 280427 48040 56 328523 Total last year 312540 Increase this year 159B3 Travelling preachers this.......year - - - .
  • The History of Heritage United Methodist Church

    The History of Heritage United Methodist Church

    The History of Heritage United Methodist Church Est. 1903 Heritage United Methodist Church 107 South Market Street Ligonier, Pennsylvania 15658 Phone: 724-238-2627 Fax: 724-238-4480 www.ligonierhumc.org On the Diamond in Ligonier, Pennsylvania In 2003, to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the dedication of the Methodist Church, It’s been more than a hundred years since Methodists in Ligonier dedicated their new the time capsule was removed and the contents were put on display in the Fellowship church on the Diamond. On the outside, the church was strong and durable with walls Hall. of blue stone, oak doors, and a bell tower tall enough to hold the town clock. It was built to be a landmark. On the inside, it was serene and peaceful. A place where one could The items taken from the 1902 Cornerstone included: feel the presence of God. It was a place to practice the doctrine of Methodism. Over a century later the church building still stands strong and its ministry continues to be in- Two Ligonier Echos dated April 1902, Greensburg Tribune Herald dated April 1902, Pitts- spired and directed by the spirit of God. burg Post dated April 1902, Two Christian Advocates, Two Italian coins – donated by stone mason Carlos Mosini, One Indian Head penny, Book of Discipline of the Methodist The Methodist doctrine, developed by John and Charles Wes- Episcopal Church of 1900 ley and friends in England, was introduced to the Ligonier Val- ley well before the Heritage Church was built. The first Meth- Items that were placed in the 2003 Time Capsule included: odist Episcopal Church was established in 1788 and author- ized by a letter from John Wesley that was sent from Bristol, 1807 Hymnal, Two 1849 Hymnals, 1905 Sunday School Record Book, 1930’s Sunday England.
  • United Methodist Bishops Page 17 Historical Statement Page 25 Methodism in Northern Europe & Eurasia Page 37

    United Methodist Bishops Page 17 Historical Statement Page 25 Methodism in Northern Europe & Eurasia Page 37

    THE NORTHERN EUROPE & EURASIA BOOK of DISCIPLINE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 2009 Copyright © 2009 The United Methodist Church in Northern Europe & Eurasia. All rights reserved. United Methodist churches and other official United Methodist bodies may reproduce up to 1,000 words from this publication, provided the following notice appears with the excerpted material: “From The Northern Europe & Eurasia Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church—2009. Copyright © 2009 by The United Method- ist Church in Northern Europe & Eurasia. Used by permission.” Requests for quotations that exceed 1,000 words should be addressed to the Bishop’s Office, Copenhagen. Scripture quotations, unless otherwise noted, are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA. Used by permission. Name of the original edition: “The Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church 2008”. Copyright © 2008 by The United Methodist Publishing House Adapted by the 2009 Northern Europe & Eurasia Central Conference in Strandby, Denmark. An asterisc (*) indicates an adaption in the paragraph or subparagraph made by the central conference. ISBN 82-8100-005-8 2 PREFACE TO THE NORTHERN EUROPE & EURASIA EDITION There is an ongoing conversation in our church internationally about the bound- aries for the adaptations of the Book of Discipline, which a central conference can make (See ¶ 543.7), and what principles it has to follow when editing the Ameri- can text (See ¶ 543.16). The Northern Europe and Eurasia Central Conference 2009 adopted the following principles. The examples show how they have been implemented in this edition.