THE IMPRECATORY PSALMS and CHRISTIAN ETHICS by John N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE IMPRECATORY PSALMS and CHRISTIAN ETHICS by John N ABSTRACT THE IMPRECATORY PSALMS AND CHRISTIAN ETHICS by John N. Day [© 2000, by John N. Day, cited with permission] Dallas Theological Seminary Readers: Prof. Don Glenn, Dr. Rick Taylor, Dr. W. Hall Harris III In this dissertation, I attempt plausibly to demonstrate that the utterance of imprecations (including the appeal for divine vengeance) against the recalcitrant enemies of God and his people—as is found in the Imprecatory Psalms—is consistent with the ethics of the Old Testament and finds corresponding (albeit somewhat lessened) echo in the New. This thesis is rooted (1) in the establishment of the psalms’ theology of imprecation in the very essence of the Torah—especially seen in the promise of divine vengeance expressed in the Song of Moses, the principle of divine justice outlined in the lex talionis, and the assurance of divine cursing as well as blessing articulated in the inaugural covenant of God with his people; and (2) in the presence of this theology carried, in essence, unchanged through to the end of the Christian Canon, and likewise utilized as the foundation for the infrequent imprecations in the New Testament. There is indeed a degree of difference in the progress of the testaments, but it is a difference in degree not a difference in kind. Thus, it is argued that whereas “love and blessing” is the dominant tone and characteristic ethic of the believer of both testaments, “cursing and calling for divine vengeance” is the believer’s extreme ethic—legitimately utilized in extreme circumstances, against sustained injustice, hardened enmity, and gross oppression. This thesis is developed in four discrete sections: (1) an evaluation of the principal solutions proffered with regard to the Imprecatory Psalms and Christian ethics; (2) an investigation into the broader ancient Near Eastern practice of imprecation; (3) an exploration of the three harshest psalms of imprecation (Pss 58, 137, 109) and the theological foundations upon which their cries were uttered; and (4) an examination of the apparently contradictory statements of the New Testament (“love your enemies” and “bless and curse not”) coupled with the continued presence of imprecations. THE IMPRECATORY PSALMS AND CHRISTIAN ETHICS _______________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Old Testament Studies Dallas Theological Seminary _______________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy [© 2000, by John N. Day, cited with permission] _______________________ by John N. Day August 2001 Accepted by the Faculty of the Dallas Theological Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. Examining Committee ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ To my beloved wife, Lorri and our dear children Tiffanie, Hannah, and JohnEzra TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS . vii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 Facing the Problem The Breadth of Definition The Stigma of Vengeance Narrowing the Field The Method of Approach 2. UNSATISFACTORY SOLUTIONS . 25 Evil Emotions Not to Be Expressed To Be Expressed and Relinquished Old Covenant Morality Inferior Morality Differing Dispensations Songs of Christ Summary iv 3. THE CULTURAL CONTEXT OF THE CURSE . 62 The Function of Imprecation in the Ancient Near East Treaty Curses Inscriptional Curses Incantations to Undo Curses The Power of the Curse 4. THE HARSHEST PSALMS OF IMPRECATION . 85 Psalm 58 Curse Against a Societal Enemy Theological Foundation Psalm 137 Curse Against a National Enemy Theological Foundation Psalm 109 Curse Against a Personal Enemy Theological Foundation 5. COLLIDING WITH THE NEW TESTAMENT . 143 Apparent Contradictions “Love Your Enemies” “Bless, and Curse Not” v Instances of Imprecation Christ The Apostles The Saints in Heaven Conclusion 6. CONCLUSION . 176 Appendices A. WOE AND CURSE . 186 B. THE TEXT OF DEUT 32:43 . 191 C. COALS OF FIRE IN ROM 12:19-20 . 197 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 206 vi ABBREVIATIONS AER American Ecclesiastical Review ANET J. B. Pritchard (ed.), Ancient Near Eastern Texts, 3d ed BDB F. Brown, S. R. Driver, and C. A. Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament BECNT Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament BHS Biblia hebraica stuttgartensia Bib Biblica BSac Bibliotheca Sacra BZAW Beihefte zur ZAW CBQ Catholic Biblical Quarterly DCH D. J. A. Clines (ed.), Dictionary of Classical Hebrew ExpTim Expository Times FN Filologia Neotestamentaria GKC Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar, ed. E. Kautzsch, tr. A. E. Cowley, 2d ed HALOT L. Koehler and W. Baumgartner, Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, Revised ed HUCA Hebrew Union College Annual ICC International Critical Commentary vii JAOS Journal of the American Oriental Society JB A. Jones (ed.), Jerusalem Bible JBL Journal of Biblical Literature JETS Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies JNSL Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages JQR Jewish Quarterly Review JSNTSup Journal for the Study of the New Testament—Supplement Series JTS Journal of Theological Studies KJV King James Bible NEB New English Bible NICNT New International Commentary on the New Testament NICOT New International Commentary on the Old Testament NIDOTTE W. van Gemeren (ed.), New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis NIGTC New International Greek Testament Commentary NIV New International Version NRSV New Revised Standard Version NTS New Testament Studies OTL Old Testament Library PTR Princeton Theological Review RB Revue biblique viii RevQ Revue de Qumran RTR Reformed Theological Review TDNT G. Kittel and G. Friedrich (eds.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament TDOT G. J. Botterweck and H. Ringgren (eds.), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament TEV Today’s English Version TOTC Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries TNTC Tyndale New Testament Commentaries TWOT R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer Jr., and B. K. Waltke (eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament TynBul Tyndale Bulletin VT Vetus Testamentum WBC Word Biblical Commentary WTJ Westminster Theological Journal ZAW Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Facing the Problem There is hardly an area of biblical theology more troublesome to the Christian conscience than that expressed in the so-called Imprecatory Psalms—those psalms whose characterizing element is the desire for God’s just vengeance to fall upon his and his people’s enemies, including the use of more formal curses or imprecations. These psalms naturally evoke a reaction of revulsion to Christians schooled in the “law of Christ”; the venom these psalms exude collides abrasively with their sweeter instincts. For are not Christians called to “love your enemies” (Matt 5:44), to “bless and not curse” (Rom 12:14)? How, then, can such calls for the barbaric “dashing of infants against the rocks” (Ps 137:9), the “bathing of feet in the blood of the wicked” (Ps 58:10), the “curse passed down to the 1 offender’s children” (Ps 109:10-15) be justified? Are the Imprecatory Psalms merely a way of venting one’s rage without really meaning it? Has the morality of Scripture evolved? Or is cursing enemies the Old Testament way and loving enemies the New Testament way? And is there any legitimate echo of the substance of these psalms in the New Testament? 1 Partly based upon a negative reaction to the invectives hurled against their enemies by the psalmists, Gunkel asserts: “the opinion that the Old Testament is a safe guide to true religion and morality cannot any longer be maintained.” Hermann Gunkel, What Remains of the Old Testament and Other Essays, trans. A. K. Dallas (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1928), 16. 1 2 There have been a few modern treatments of the Imprecatory Psalms vis-à-vis their relation to biblical theology and the New Testament. However these treatments have been, in large measure, cursory, and the proposed solutions have been, in my view, 2 theologically inadequate. The Imprecatory Psalms have been unsatisfactorily explained 3 chiefly as expressing (1) evil emotions—whether to be suppressed or expressed (e.g., Lewis, 4 Brueggemann ), (2) a morality consonant with the Old Covenant but inconsistent with the 5 6 New (e.g., Zuck, Laney ), or (3) words appropriately uttered solely from the lips of Christ, 7 and consequently only by his followers through him and his cross (e.g., Adams, 8 Bonhoeffer ). 2 The reasons for their respective inadequacy will be dealt with below. Chiefly and summarily, a theologically adequate reconciliation of the Imprecatory Psalms with Christian ethics must deal fairly with the entirety of scriptural revelation. 3 C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1958). Idem, Christian Reflections, ed. Walter Hooper (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1967). 4 Walter Brueggemann, The Message of the Psalms: A Theological Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1984). Idem, Praying the Psalms (Winona, MN: Saint Mary’s Press, 1986). 5 Roy Ben Zuck, “The Problem of the Imprecatory Psalms” (Th.M. thesis, Dallas Theological Seminary, 1957). 6 J. Carl Laney, “A Fresh Look at the Imprecatory Psalms,” BSac 138 (1981): 35-45. 7 James E. Adams, War Psalms of the Prince of Peace: Lessons from the Imprecatory Psalms (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1991). 8 Dietrich Bonhoeffer, “A Bonhoeffer Sermon,” trans. Daniel Bloesch, ed. F. Burton Nelson, Theology
Recommended publications
  • The Imprecatory Psalms
    The imprecatory Psalms Although the Psalms were written many years ago, in an age and culture very different from ours, they still speak to Christians today. The Psalms are timeless, for they express the whole range of human feelings and experiences — from dark doubts and deep depression to exuberant joy and thankful praise. Today, Christians' experience the same emotions. They are puzzled by the same problems of life, cry out in great need, and delight in praise and worship to the same God. We can identify with the poets of the Psalms in many ways. Yet, there are certain themes in the Psalms which cause many people, even sincere Christians, great problems. The imprecatory character of some of the Psalms, where the author requests God to punish and pour out His wrath against evildoers, poses problems which are not easily solved. Problem Psalms Of the one hundred and fifty Psalms, six are commonly classified as "imprecatory" Psalms. These are the 55th, 59th, 69th, 79th, 109th and 137th Psalms. Besides these Psalms, there are portions of other Psalms which include statements, calling for God's wrath and punishment to be executed upon the wicked. Some examples are Psalms 17:13-14, 35:4-6, 24-26, 58:6-11, 68:1, 71:13, 83:13-17, 94:1-7, 129:5-8, 140:9-11, 143:12, etc. How can we account for the petitions raised to God in regard for curses upon the wicked? "Let death seize upon them, and let them go down quick into hell" (Psalms 55:15), or "Break their teeth, O God, in their mouth" (Psalms 58:6), "Let them be blotted out of the book of the living?" (Psalms 69:28), "Pour out thy wrath upon the heathen" (Psalms 79:6), are some of the awesome curses the Psalmists wish upon their enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imprecatory Psalms KJV 5, 10, 17, 35, 58, 59, 69, 70, 79, 83, 109, 129, 137, 140 Psalm 5 1 Give Ear to My Words, O LORD
    The Imprecatory Psalms KJV 7 His mouth is full of cursing and deceit and 5, 10, 17, 35, 58, 59, 69, 70, 79, 83, 109, 129, fraud: under his tongue is mischief and vanity. 137, 140 8 He sitteth in the lurking places of the villages: in the secret places doth he murder the innocent: Psalm 5 his eyes are privily set against the poor. 1 9 Give ear to my words, O LORD, consider my He lieth in wait secretly as a lion in his den: he meditation. lieth in wait to catch the poor: he doth catch the 2 Hearken unto the voice of my cry, my King, and poor, when he draweth him into his net. my God: for unto thee will I pray. 10 He croucheth, and humbleth himself, that the 3 My voice shalt thou hear in the morning, poor may fall by his strong ones. 11 O LORD; in the morning will I direct my prayer He hath said in his heart, God hath forgotten: unto thee, and will look up. he hideth his face; he will never see it. 4 12 For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in Arise, O LORD; O God, lift up thine hand: forget wickedness: neither shall evil dwell with thee. not the humble. 5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou 13 Wherefore doth the wicked contemn God? he hatest all workers of iniquity. hath said in his heart, Thou wilt not require it. 6 Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing: 14 Thou hast seen it; for thou beholdest mischief the LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imprecatory Psalms: an Interpretive Guide
    THE IMPRECATORY PSALMS: AN INTERPRETIVE GUIDE The imprecatory psalms are some of the most shocking words in the Bible. Take Psalm 137:9: “Blessed shall he be who takes your little ones and dashes them against the rock!” It is hard to imagine cross-stitching that passage on a pillow, and yet these are inspired words of God. How should we understand them? A Christ-Centered Interpretation Due to the shocking nature of many of these imprecatory psalms, three primary interpretive responses have been proffered. Some have attempted to dismiss the imprecatory psalms as vengeful cries from a primitive people. Unfortunately, in making this assertion they disregard Scripture’s unity and authority, and they make themselves self-sufficient arbiters of God’s Word. A second approach is similar. In the progress of redemption and revelation, the New Testament imperative to love your enemies has trumped this Old Testament ethic of retribution. While acknowledging the place of these psalms in history, they make them out to be obsolete. The problem again is that this method disjoints the Bible, when in fact the NT interprets these psalms in light of Christ. A third approach is to read these imprecations in the light of Christ. As we put these Davidic words in Jesus’ mouth, we begin to understand his pleas from the cross. Likewise, we better understand the purpose of these troubled psalms. On this side of the cross, we can read these psalms fearfully as we consider the eschatological retribution that will be poured out on Christ’s aggressors, who have not trusted in his own wrath-bearing atonement.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Study of Imprecatory Psalms: Reformed and Evangelical Approaches to the Interpretation of Imprecatory Psalms
    Simango and Krüger, “Imprecatory Psalms,” OTE 29/2 (2016): 581-600 581 An Overview of the Study of Imprecatory Psalms: Reformed and Evangelical Approaches to the Interpretation of Imprecatory Psalms DANIEL SIMANGO & P. PAUL KRÜGER (NWU) ABSTRACT This article looks at some interpretive issues regarding the so-called imprecatory psalms, focusing on the debate within reformed and evangelical circles. Introductory issues regarding these psalms abound, such as their definition and scope and the question whether they constitute a specific genre or subgenre within the Psalter. More important are hermeneutical issues regarding the rationale or motivation behind these psalms, namely the reasons why they were written in the first place. These issues also inform the relevance for the present day reader, specifically the New Testament reader, or vice versa: the perceived relevance informs the interpreter's stance on the rationale of these psalms. The article argues that reformed and evangelical scholars’ interpretations of imprecation Psalms are largely led by their presuppositions about the relation between the Old and New Testament. The article concludes by suggesting that the deadlock in approaches could be resolved by an in-depth exegesis of the specific psalms taking into account the divergent presuppositions of contemporary interpreters. KEYWORDS: Imprecatory Psalms; Evangelical Approach; Reformed Approach; Covenant; Prophetic Books. A INTRODUCTION The book of the Psalms is one of the most read and most popular books of the Bible in the church. It is often used for devotional readings in the life of the church and believers. Despite its popularity, the study of the Psalter is problematic in academic circles because of the numerous questions surrounding authorship, setting, composition, interpretation, theology, and application.1 Not least of all is the * Article submitted: 29/04/2016; accepted: 22/06/2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlotte Motor Speed- Take Every Win That’S Available, His Performance Sheet 3
    The Daytona Beach News-Journal’s Godwin Kelly & Ken Willis have covered NASCAR for nearly 60 years combined. godwin.kelly@ NASCAR THIS WEEK news-jrnl.com [email protected] SPEED FREAKS QUESTIONS & ATTITUDE A few questions we had to ask ourselves Compelling questions ... and PHOENIX maybe a few actual answers Your knee-jerk review of Vegas and results of the “new THREE THINGS TO WATCH Is that a look of concern? package”? GODSPEAK: It’s a work in 1. Penske power Let’s call it a mix of mild concern, progress. Drivers have more car balanced by a hesitance to offer control, and there have been It sure looks like Team snap judgment. I tuned into Sun- fewer wrecks. Give it time. Penske has found the day’s race, saw a big pack of cars KEN’S CALL: If it seemed perfect secret key to the new slicing and dicing, and said, “See, at the start, the engineers NASCAR package — two that’s exactly what NASCAR was would eventually mess it up. But wins by two drivers on looking for with the new con- it seems imperfect at the start, consecutive weekends. figurations.” Then I looked in the so maybe the engineers will find Joey Logano credited corner of the screen and realized a way to tighten up the field. Ford’s engineers for solv- it was just the second lap of Reverse psychology, right there. ing the puzzle. “Everyone a green-flag run. By Lap 10, it is going through a learn- became the Urban Meyer 400 — Kez, then Joey.
    [Show full text]
  • • Interview with Lorenzo Tucker. Remembering Dorothy Dandridge. • Vonetta Mcgee • the Blaxploitation Era • Paul Robeson •
    • Interview with Lorenzo Tucker. Remembering Dorothy Dandridge. • Vonetta McGee • The Blaxploitation Era • Paul Robeson •. m Vol. 4, No.2 Spring 1988 ,$2.50 Co-produced with the Black Film Institute of the University of the District of Columbia .,.... ~. .# • ...-. .~ , .' \ r . t .• ~ . ·'t I !JJIII JlIf8€ LA~ ~N / Ul/ll /lOr&£ LAlE 1\6fJt1~ I WIL/, ,.,Dr 8~ tATE /lfVll" I h/ILl kif /J£ tlf1E M/tl# / wlU ~t11' BE 1II~ fr4lt11 I k/Ilt- /V6f Ie tJ]1f. 1t6/tlfV _ I WILL No~ ~'% .,~. "o~ ~/~-_/~ This is the Spring 1988 issue of der which we mail the magazine, the Black Fzlm Review. You're getting it U.S. Postal Service will not forward co- ~~~~~ some time in mid 1988, which means pies, even ifyou've told them your new',: - we're almost on schedule. - address. You need to tell us as well, be- \ Thank you for keeping faith with cause the Postal Service charges us to tell us. We're going to do our best not to us where you've gone. be late. Ever again. Third: Why not buy a Black Fzlm Without your support, Black Fzlm Review T-shirt? They're only $8. They Review could not have evolved from a come in black or dark blue, with the two-page photocopied newsletter into logo in white lettering. We've got lots the glossy magazine it is today. We need of them, in small, medium, large, and your continued support. extra-large sizes. First: You can tell ifyour subscrip­ And, finally, why not make a con­ tion is about to lapse by comparing the tribution to Sojourner Productions, Inc., last line of your mailing label with the the non-profit, tax-exempt corporation issue date on the front cover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imprecatory Psalms
    Do I not hate those who hate you O Lord? Learning to read the imprecatory psalms By Randal Rauser www.randalrauser.com Christians have long loved and prayed the psalms… • Hymns/Praise • Royal Psalms • Thanksgiving Psalms • Wisdom Psalms • Mixed types • Lament/Complaint Christians have long loved and prayed the psalms… • Hymns/Praise • Royal Psalms • Thanksgiving Psalms • Wisdom Psalms • Mixed types • Lament/Complaint 1 The LORD is my shepherd, I lack nothing. 5 You prepare a table before me 2 He makes me lie down in green in the presence of my enemies. pastures, You anoint my head with oil; he leads me beside quiet my cup overflows. waters, 6 Surely your goodness and love will 3 he refreshes my soul. He guides me along the right follow me paths all the days of my life, for his name's sake. and I will dwell in the house of the 4 Even though I walk LORD forever. through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me. 1 The LORD is my shepherd, I lack nothing. 5 You prepare a table before me 2 He makes me lie down in green in the presence of my enemies. pastures, You anoint my head with oil; he leads me beside quiet my cup overflows. waters, 6 Surely your goodness and love will 3 he refreshes my soul. He guides me along the right follow me paths all the days of my life, for his name's sake. and I will dwell in the house of the 4 Even though I walk LORD forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Imprecatory Speech-Acts in the Book of Acts
    The Asbury Journal 63/2:xx-xx © 2008 Asbury Theological Seminary DAVID H. WENKEL Imprecatory Speech-Acts in the Book of Acts Abstract Theologies of prayer in Acts have long neglected imprecatory prayers or curses as integral to the theological agenda of Luke. This article seeks to survey the instances of imprecations in Acts to determine how they function as speech-acts. The article makes two conclusions about imprecations in Acts based on the survey. First, imprecations identify the true People of God in the midst of competing claims. Second, imprecations reveal how one can participate in the salvific work of God. KEYWORDS: prayer, curse, imprecatory, imprecation, Luke, Acts, People of God, salvation David H. Wenkel is currently pursuing graduate studies at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. 81 Imprecatory prayers are not unique to the Judeo-Christian scripture and are commonly defined as a prayer of cursing so that evil would befall another person.1 They are challenging for the Christian tradition on several levels. While imprecations have long been recognized as existing in the New Testament, they are rarely integrated into biblical theologies of prayer on either a text or canonical level. With regard to the book of Acts it is particularly true that theologies of prayer lack interaction with imprecations. If cursing or imprecations are discussed it is not always clear what they are accomplishing or how they function in the larger narrative framework.2 There are several approaches to dealing with the problem of imprecations in the New Testament. One approach places imprecations under a rubric of the changes within the epochs in salvation history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Problem of the Imprecatory Psalms
    THE ETHICAL PROBLEM OF THE IMPRECATORY PSALMS JOHANNES G. VOS F THE hundred and fifty Psalms in the Psalter, six are Ocommonly classified as ' 'imprecatory'' Psalms. These are the 55th, 59th, 69th, 79th, 109th and 137th. The 137th is not ascribed to a particular author; the scene pictured in it is "by the rivers of Babylon". The 79th is ascribed to Asaph, and the remaining four to David. It must be admitted that the designation "imprecatory" is open to objection on the ground that as applied to these Psalms it is not merely descriptive of the content of the Psalms but also commonly conveys a certain impression of reproach, a certain element of disapproval on the part of the person using the term. These Psalms are indeed imprecatory, if this term be understood in its proper sense of invoking a judgment, calamity or curse, and the objection is not to the term itself so much as to the manner of its use by many persons, as if to designate a Psalm as "imprecatory" were almost the same as calling it "wicked" or "immoral". Though various other designations, such as "Psalms of Justice", have been suggested, these are not satisfactory because they fail to designate that which differentiates these Psalms from the other parts of the Psalter. Consequently in the present article we shall avail ourselves of the common designation of "Imprecatory Psalms". Certain expressions in these Psalms have caused a great deal of abuse to be heaped upon them, some persons even going so far as to say that they breathe a savage spirit and are totally unfit for Christian devotional use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pray-The-Imprecatory-Psalms
    Pray The Imprecatory Psalms 5, 10, 17, 35, 58, 59, 69, 70, 79, 83, 109, 129, 137, 140 The so-called Imprecatory psalms are prayers from King David asking God to protect him from his enemies. Some Christians believe that we should not pray the Imprecatory psalms. What would be the reasons to not pray to God for protection from our enemies? Would a reason be that we are called to endure abuse as a part of our Christian witness? Over the centuries of Christian history believers have been in danger of being abused by their enemies. To suffer needless abuse for ourselves and our loved ones for no reason is not always something a thing we must endure. Our heavenly father loves us and what earthy father is willing to let his wife and children suffer because of a bully. To be persecuted because we will not deny Christ is quite another thing. To be martyred for Christ is quite another thing. Would a reason be that we always have to be loving to our enemies as well as to our friends? Loving sometimes means standing up to someone. Do we have to always be “nice?” Jesus was often not nice. Merely nice Christians are often without a witness to others. Merely nice people without convictions are useless. Would a reason be that in the New Testament, “He (Jesus) has obtained a more excellent ministry, by as much as He is also the mediator of a better covenant, which has been enacted on better promises.” (Hebrews 8:6 NASB) What does “better” mean.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Munday Lawrence, Producer. Oscar Micheaux, Film Pioneer
    Carol Munday Lawrence, Producer. Oscar Mi cheaux, Fi lm Pioneer. (Nguzo Saba Films, Inc., 1981) 16mm film, 29 minutes, color, rental fe e $19.75; purchase $650.00. Distributor: Beacon Films, P.O. Box 575, Norwood, MA 02062 (617/762-08 11). Oscar Micheaux, Film Pioneer is one of seven filmsin the "Were You There" series produced by Carol Lawrence (the others include The Black We st, The Cotton Club, The Facts of Life, Portrait of Two Artists, Sports Profile, and When the Animals Talked). This film's story revolves around Bee Freeman's (the Sepia Mae West) and Lorenzo Tucker's (the black Valentino) recollections of their relationships with Micheaux and their perceptions of his character. Danny Glover plays the role of Oscar Micheaux, Richard Harder is shown as the young Lorenzo Tucker, and Janice Morgan portrays the vamp that was Bee Freeman in Shuffle Along. The fi lm is technologically superior-better than anything that Micheaux ever produced between 1918 and 1948-and visually pleasing. The only significantproblem with Oscar Micheaux, Film Pioneer is the overall veracity of the information provided by Freeman and Tucker. Three examples will suffice: Freeman says that "In South America they went crazy over all [of Micheaux's] pictures"; what she probably meant was the Southern United States, which is the truth. Tucker says that Paul Robeson was in the Homesteader (19 18); Robeson was in only one Micheaux film and that was Body and Soul (1925). He also says that God's Step Children (1938) was Micheaux's fi nal fi lm, but there were at least three others after God's Step Children, including Th e No torious Elinor Lee (1940), Lying Lips (1940), and The Betrayal (1948), which was a flop.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Look at the Imprecatory Psalms
    Bibliotheca Sacra 138 (1981) 35-45 Copyright © 1981 by Dallas Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. A Fresh Look at the Imprecatory Psalms J. Carl Laney Included in the Psalter are various psalms containing appeals for God to pour out His wrath on the psalmist's enemies. These psalms are commonly classified "imprecatory psalms" for the imprecation forms a chief element in the psalm. These psalms have been problematic for Bible teachers and preachers because of the difficulty in reconciling them with Christian thought. Barnes comments on this problem. perhaps there is no part of the Bible that gives more perplexity and pain to its readers than this; perhaps nothing that constitutes a more plausible objection to the belief that the psalms are the productions of inspired men than the spirit of revenge which they sometimes seem to breathe and the spirit of cherished malice and implacableness which the writers seem to manifest.1 The purposes of this article are to define an "imprecation," iden- tify the imprecatory psalms, pinpoint the problem that interpre- ters have with such psalms, recount proposed solutions to the difficulty, and present a suggested solution to this problem. The Definition of Imprecation An "imprecation" is an invocation of judgment, calamity, or curse uttered against one's enemies, or the enemies of God. The morning prayer of Moses was an imprecation that the enemies of Yahweh, who were Moses' enemies as well, would be scattered and flee from His presence (Num. 10:35). The Song of Deborah 35 36 Bibliotheca Sacra -- January-March 1981 and Barak concludes with an imprecation that Yahweh's ene- mies might perish (Judg.
    [Show full text]