Democrat Use It! by the Editor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Democrat Use It! by the Editor IRISHMEN, YOU HAVE THE VOTE fcui'.m DEMOCRAT USE IT! BY THE EDITOR ^^E'RE not telling you who to vote for. It's not our business. LANDLADIES BEWARE! BUT WE DO SAY: YOU HAVE —That lodger may be the A VOTE, USE IT. Irish Democrat reporter Candidates have told the Irish Demo- cret that in canvassing they have found THAT TOOLBOX MAY HOLD A CAMERA! Irishmen who are unaware that they are entitled to vote. EVERY IRISHMAN OVER 21, EVERY IRISH WOMAN OVER 21, IS ENTITLED TO VOTE. MR. MAURICE ORBACH, M.P. If he or she lives in lodgings, then the landlord or landlady had the duty to-fill " One of the big issues in the Six Counties in a return and see all lodgers were on the which has unfortunately also made its register. There are severe penalties for appearance in Britain is that of discrimina- failuie to record all persons of voting age tion in employment, in schools and in letting living on the premises. of rooms. Most of my constituents are aware that I have spent the last 15 years in fighting such discrimination, and that I will continue HAVE YOU MOVED ? to declare as base and evil any effort to pre- II you have moved since the register was vent a man or woman from working, or their made just before Christmas, then you will be children from going to school, or their being on the register lor your former address, and housed on the grounds of faith or colour. can vote there. II it is not far away, take the " I hope all Irishmen who are at present trouble to do .so. resident in Britain will participate in our But before the election ask the candidates democratic way of life, not only by voting at their views. You are entitled to take a full local and national elections, but also by part in the political life of Britain. You have joining their respective trade unions, and so absolutely equal rights, guaranteed by law, helping themselves and their fellow-workers WHAT'S WRONG HERE? with any British-born citizen. Claim them and to establish a decent standard of life and use them. Take part in the campaign. Ask proper working conditions." the candidates where they stand on partition, 1. NOT ENOUGH BEDCLOTHES FOR MARCH 1955. and also on housing, wages, peace and colonial Now ask the Tories, and see if they can offer freedom. anything better than that—somehow we doubt 2. WHERE DO THEY HANG THEIR CLOTHES? 'it. Just to start you off. the "Irish Democrat" 3. BEDS TOO MANY AND TOO CLOSE. has taken a lew samples for you. More "Irish Let's leave the " Bronx " of Britain, and go Democrats" are distributed m Willesden than to Manchester. There Ken Marks is opposing anywhere else in England, so we asked the Florence Horsbrugh, the unpopular ex-Minister WRITE IN YOUR IDEA OF WHAT Labour candidate, Mr. Maurich Orbach, M.P., of Education; Leslie Lever is standing for Ard- "DIGS" SHOULD BE LIKE ! for his views. wick. MR. ORBACH WRITES: MR. MARKS WRITES : " Nothing has convinced me that Ireland " Most Irish people know the Tory Party for MORE UNION BRANCHES should be split into two parts, and therefore what it is. Indeed the description Tory was I remain a strong supporter of the anti- coined in Ireland and was not complimentary. CONDEMN 'B' SPECIALS partition. Continued on Page 6, Column 4 kJANCHESTER Branch of the ^WWWWAWW/M "" Constructional Engineering Union has passed a resolution con- Valuables Ores I.R.A. HOAX CATCHES demning the "shooting of Irish citizens in the North of Ireland," and found in Galway demanding the disbandment of the INISTER FOR INDUSTRY > LONDON EVENING PAPER "B" specials and restoration' of full M & COMMERCE, Mr. Norton, «, democratic rights. i" told Fianna Fail deputy G. Bart- % THE 'STAR" TURNED RED IN LONDON ON MAY 2nd. St. Helens branch ol the C.E.U. also «J ley, that Mianrai Teoranta had protests against the " unorovoked attack drilled for molybdenite at >| —AND WELL MIGHT THEY BLUSH. " and views with, on Arthur Leonard, Ji Roundstone, Co. Galway with- Late night edition carried huge banner Police were said to have thrown a cor- within the United alarm the Existence out finding enough to justify % headlines right across the top of the front don round the mysterious geographical Kingdom of a police force with such wide entity where the raid was supposed to •J exploitation. / page, saying; " '6 shot in army raid' re- powers. It demands criminal proceedings port," followed by "Sentry clubbed by take place. ^ But traces had now been «] against those responsible and the dis- IR.A. men." But alas! The "Late night edition" found near Mace, and prelimi- % bandment ot the "B" Specials. was forced to carry a wee one-and-a-half Then followed an account of great ex- nary investigations were being V inch paragraph, right at the bottom of Further protests have come Iiom citements in "Armagh, Co. Tyrone." This made to see if it was worth page one headed "l.R.A. hoax"—admit- apparently passed the sub-editors and E T U. branches in South London; Acton ting that the raid on Armagh (County while getting the drills out seems to have aroused no suspicions. N U.R. protest .as reported in our third Tyrone!) had not taken place at all. edition last mc (th. People were saying that newspapers in Britain are a bit too ready to rush into print when there is an anti-Irish story. The "Manchester Guardian" recently pub- CONNOLLY PRESIDENT CALLS FOR UNITY lished three "expert" articles on Satur- days, purporting to show the terrible con- collaboration be- voice, said Mr. Clancy, they were numer- through not understanding the nature of pROSPECT of ditions that Irish girls suffer under—and . ., ous enough to win Labour to opposition Imperialism, had led it into a dead end. the total effect was not to show Irish between Irish organisations was ^ ^ Border But there were men in it he would be girls in a very good light. the object of an Analysing the prospects of co-operation phmd to work with, The "South London Press" gave splash at West London bonnouy Mbbuo.a ^^ bodies as they cxjsted to.day> Evan (he sma|,est organisation, the headlines to the statements of Mr. Isaacs, tion, when Mr. P. J. Clancy, prestdent hc sajrf jt was necessary t0 rcmember that London " United Irishmen," contained M.P. for Southward, who spoke of the alleged nuisance of the Irish Danoe Hall of the association, traced the years ev(jn jn organisations with bad or reac- sincere nationalists, and he would not be wi,h ,hem on ma1,ers thers—though the police report was by of effort he and his colleagues had tionary leadership, there were good and of common Intorest. no means so damning. spent advocating that Irish people | cere Irishmen. Many of the alleged " ' ' S n The "Daily Herald" spoke of an "Irish- should unite on a single platform obstacles to co-operation were unreal, TIE way of co-operation may not be man's Rise" m a recent editorial (It would against partition. l.iOR example, Sinn Fein was a Repub- I easy or short, said Mr. Clancy, but be better called an Englishman's rise, for that is what the British old age pen- The Connolly Association, lie said, had ' lican organisation which had impor- the Connolly Association would not be discharging its responsibility if it did not sioners have got, and is the old trick of had fts ups and its downs. It could now tant objectives in common. The Con- sound the note of unity among fc-ish British Toryism. claim without fear of contradiction that nolly Association was insistent that poli- people in Britain If others did not come And then evon "Reynolds News" has it was the most influential Irish organisa- tical methods were needed Were the with the Association in seeing unity with posters on show which say: "Serving tion in Britain. doubts which Sinn Fein had on this sub- the British Labour Movement as equally Democratic Britain"—and display the six But even though the future 1 argely ject any argument against co-operating essential, it was no reason for rejecting counties prominently in the picture. depended on how fast, it could establish where we did agree? For example, why the unity that could be obtained. Will they never learn? When there was fresh branches and grow into a mass not a joint campaign in Britain for the The pre-condition for unity was, he a newspaper strike the British people had movement, it was its policy to try to get disbandmrnt of the B" Specials? The stressed, the building up of a strong Con- a fair picture of foreign countries for the united action with others Anti-Partition League was not a Repub- nolly Association, since the ideas of Con- first time they heard nothing about lican organisation, and its leaders. nolly were the unifying Ideas. them. It the Irish in Britain spoke with one 2 THE IRISH DEMOCRAT May 1955 May 1955 THE IRISH DEMOCRAT 3 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAm AAAAAAA^4MA« > Prison for going on strike f * IBISH DEMOCRAT 'OME emplnyci:.' as.-oisal 10 and trade Registrar under section l(j of the Trade N as-iicial ions conic under ihe Com- Union Act. 1871 together with such re- > IS ONE OF THE PROVISIONS OF i 53 Rosoman Street, London, E.C.l panics Acts and may spend money on poli- turn covering the union's income and ex- I ncal objects without hindrance provided, penditure as to its Northern Ireland mem- THE TRADES DISPUTES ACT > All communications to Subscription Rates: of e.uirsc, that ilie memorandum of asso- bers as the Registrar may require.
Recommended publications
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry Page 1 of 182
    The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry Page 1 of 182 Preferred Citation: Beinin, Joel. The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry: Culture, Politics, and the Formation of a Modern Diaspora. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft2290045n/ The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry Culture, Politics. and the Formation of Modern Diaspora Joel Beinin UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · London © 1998 The Regents of the University of California To Miriam, my life partner Preferred Citation: Beinin, Joel. The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry: Culture, Politics, and the Formation of a Modern Diaspora. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft2290045n/ To Miriam, my life partner Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to the many Egyptian Jews in Egypt, Israel, Paris, and San Francisco who shared their memories, papers, and hearts with me in the course of my research for this book. Without their assistance, this book would have been an entirely different and inferior product. Their names are listed in the Bibliography. Many Egyptian Jews as well as other friends and colleagues saved clippings from the Israeli and Egyptian press for me, allowed me to copy personal papers, or gave me books, magazines, and other materials that were invaluable sources for this book. Among them were Raymond Aghion, Ada Aharoni, Shlomo Barad, Esther and Gilbert Bar-On, Henriette Busnach, Yusuf Darwish, Marcelle Fisher, Karim al-Gawhary, Yitzhaq Gormezano-Goren, David Harel, Anda Harel-Dagan, Jacques Hassoun, Reuven Kaminer, Mourad El-Kodsi, Yoram Meital, Doris and Henry Mourad, Remy and Joe Pessah, Sami Shemtov, Ted Swedenburg, and Robert Vitalis.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961)
    Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961) N. Israeli (Akiva Orr and Moshé Machover) Translated from Hebrew by Mark Marshall ii Introduction [to the first edition]................................................................................... xv Chapter 1: “Following Clayton’s Participation in the League’s Meetings”................ 1 Chapter 2: Borders and Refugees ................................................................................. 28 Map: How the Palestinian state was divided............................................................ 42 Chapter 3: Israel and the Powers (1948-1955)............................................................. 83 Chapter 4: Israel and Changes in the Arab World ................................................... 141 Chapter 5: Reprisal Actions......................................................................................... 166 Chapter 6: “The Third Kingdom of Israel” (29/11/56 – 7/3/57).............................. 225 Chapter 7: Sinai War: Post-Mortem........................................................................... 303 Chapter 8: After Suez................................................................................................... 394 Chapter 9: How is the Problem to be Solved?............................................................ 420 Appendices (1999) ......................................................................................................... 498 Appendix 1: Haaretz article on the 30th anniversary of “Operation Qadesh”
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Sources
    172 Appendices Appendix 1: Sources Newspapers and Journals Cahiers du Communisme* Comment* Daily Herald* Daily Mail* Daily Worker France Nouvelle* The Guardian* Horizons* L’Humanité Israel Labour News* Jewish Chronicle Jewish Clarion* Jewish Vanguard* (Poale Zion) Labour Herald* Labour Israel* Labour Leader* Labour Monthly* Labour Woman* LFI News* Marxism Today Le Matin* Le Monde Morning Star New Socialist* New Statesman (and Nation)* La Nouvelle Critique* Le Nouvel Observateur* Paris-Presse* La Pensée* Le Populaire Quotidien de Paris* The Spectator* The Times Les Temps Modernes* Tribune Twentieth Century* Vanguard* (Poale Zion) World News (and Views)* Zionist Review* * ϭ occasional. 172 Appendices 173 Labour Party Published Documents Agenda for the Annual Conference Labour Party Annual Conference Report (LPACR) Agenda for the National Conference of Labour Women (NCLW) NCLW Reports Resolutions TUC Reports Problems of Foreign Policy (1952 Labour Party discussion document) Labour Party Foreign Affairs, 1946/47 Labour’s Foreign Policy (1958 LPAC) Britain in the Modern World (1959 Labour Party discussion document) Notes for Speakers (1974, Foreign Policy) A Socialist Foreign Policy (1981 Labour Party discussion document) Parliamentary Documents Early Day Motions (EDMs) Parliamentary Reports (Hansard) Labour Party Internal Documents NEC International Department/Committee Middle East Sub-Committee (MESC) Parliamentary Group, LFI Communist Party of Great Britain Internal Documents International Department Private Papers Hugh Dalton (British Library
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Anti-American ?': the British Left and the United States, 1945-1956
    (1) 'Who is anti-American ?': The British Left and the United States, 1945-1956 by Giora Goodman University College London A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) © 1996 U (2) Abstract The subject of this research is British 'anti-Americanism' in the decade after 1945: a complex phenomenon with often contradictory political and cultural manifestations. This study focuses primarily on the attitudes towards the United States of the organized political Left, because the Left came to be regarded in this period as the most 'anti-American' element in British political life. Examining that charge, this study follows the development of attitudes towards the United States in British political life, particularly within the Labour Party, long- established as the most serious organized force on the Left, and the governing Party from 1945 to 195 1. The study aims to show that hostile responses towards the United States on the British Left imbibed the same national resentments which could be found in other quarters of British political life. The British Left had its own set of ideological and emotional prejudices which gave a distinct colour, and perhaps added impetus, to its resentments. However, underpinning all the hostile sentiments was the resentment of Britain's postwar domination and displacement by the United States, which among Conservatives was concealed only by the onset of the Cold War, until it forcefully erupted during the Suez crisis. Finally, this study delineates and examines the great concern with which 'anti- Americanism' was viewed at the time by policy-makers and politicians on both sides of the Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of New Labor's Multicultural Education Policy
    Building a tolerant society : the origins of New Labor's multicultural education policy Author: Melanie Bashor Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/961 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History BUILDING A TOLERANT SOCIETY: THE ORIGINS OF NEW LABOR'S MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION POLICY A Thesis by MELANIE BASHOR submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 2009 © copyright by MELANIE DIANNE BASHOR 2009 BUILDING A TOLERANT SOCIETY: THE ORIGINS OF NEW LABOR'S MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION POLICY Melanie Bashor Thesis Chair: Peter H. Weiler In 1997, New Labor embraced an ideal of multiculturalism in an attempt to foster a particular brand of open communication and respectful cooperation among different individuals and cultural groups. This MA thesis investigates the background to one aspect of this multiculturalism, New Labor's education policies. The thesis shows how New Labor's current multicultural ideal originated in the 1960s in Labor's attempts to combat racial discrimination. As its attempts proved inadequate, Labor expanded its understanding of what was necessary to create a tolerant society, including educational policies that fostered tolerance, respect for different cultural groups, and personal responsibility. During eighteen years spent in opposition to a Conservative majority government, Labor refined its ideal of multiculturalism in debates, forging a path from the idealistic and radical reforms of the 1960s and 1970s toward New Labor's middle way.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Labour Party and Palestine 1917-1949. Phd Thesis, University of Nottingham
    Sargent, Andrew (1980) The British Labour Party and Palestine 1917-1949. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11289/1/280995.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] A. Sargent. The British labour Party and Palestine 1917 -1949 Nottingham University !-r -\ "'The British Labour Party and Palestine 1917-1949'by Andrew Sargent, B.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Who Is Anti-American?': the British Left and the United States, 1945-1956
    (1) ‘Who is anti-American ?’: The British Left and the United States, 1945-1956 by Giora Goodman University College London A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) © 1996 ProQuest Number: 10017218 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10017218 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 (2 ) Abstract The subject of this research is British ‘anti-Americanism’ in the decade after 1945: a complex phenomenon with often contradictory political and cultural manifestations. This study focuses primarily on the attitudes towards the United States of the organized political Left, because the Left came to be regarded in this period as the most ‘anti-American’ element in British political life. Examining that charge, this study follows the development of attitudes towards the United States in British political life, particularly within the Labour Party, long- established as the most serious organized force on the Left, and the governing Party from 1945 to 1951. The study aims to show that hostile responses towards the United States on the British Left imbibed the same national resentments which could be found in other quarters of British political life.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Anglo-Egyptian Refugees in Britain
    ASSETS AND LIABILITIES: REFUGEES FROM HUNGARY AND EGYPT IN FRANCE AND IN BRITAIN, 1956-1960 ALEXANDRE DE ARANJO Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy JULY 2013 Abstract This thesis investigates the reception and treatment of the refugees from Hungary and Egypt who arrived in France and in Britain after the Hungarian revolution and the Suez crisis. The thesis argues that the reception of the refugees from Hungary and from Egypt was primarily linked to the French and British immigration policies and influenced by the Cold War context. The first part deals with the creation of the Hungarian refugees and their reception in France and Britain. Chapter two gives a brief account on the Hungarian revolution and what led 200,000 Hungarians to leave their country. Chapter three deals with the reception and treatment of the Hungarian refugees in France, and sets out to demonstrate how the revolution and the refugee situation were first exploited for propagandistic purposes and national political interests. It also examines immigration policy in France and how the Hungarians were to serve France's economic and demographic interests as candidates for immigration. French-Jewish responses to the refugee situation are also explored. Finally, it discusses the effects of the Cold War in the resettlement process. Chapter four explores similar questions about the Hungarians with respect to Britain. The second part of the thesis studies the expulsion of the French, British and stateless Jews from Egypt and their resettlement in France and Britain. Chapter five deals with who the refugees from Egypt were, and the unusual nature of their nationality and cultural background.
    [Show full text]