Of Human Evolution S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of Human Evolution S C CTONI HYP TE OT HE SE OF HUMAN EVOLUTION S M. Royhan Gani and Nahid DS Gani tum. Tectonics can be seen as the Tearing Apart root cause of Earth’s changing and ometime around 7 million diverse landscapes and seascapes and The African superplume has been years ago, the land in East their associated climates. The cyclic brewing beneath eastern Africa for Africa began to rise in ear- breakup and reassembly of the super- at least the last 45 million years. The nest, and life on Earth took continents Rodinia and Pangea can earliest direct surface evidence of the Sa drastic turn. A creature began to be explained simply by the existence rising hot plume-head is in north- evolve into a form that would eventu- of one or two superplumes (upwell- east Africa’s Afar region, as seen by ally take over the world. ings of abnormally hot rock from the extensive volcanism around 30 mil- Exactly how humans originated core-mantle boundary) in the mantle. lion years ago. Consequent weaken- and evolved is an intrinsic intel- Only two superplumes exist today: ing of the lithosphere, Earth’s rigid lectual question. But one thing has one beneath Africa and the other outer layer, by excessive heating and become fairly clear: Tectonics was beneath the Pacific. Perhaps, it is this mechanical stretching resulted in rift- ultimately responsible for the evolu- African superplume that was ulti- ing in three directions in Ethiopia and tion of humankind. mately responsible for driving human in the eventual creation of the Gulf of Any discussion of the evolution of evolution in East Africa. Aden, the East African Rift and the life starts with Charles Darwin, and Humanity began in Africa. Genetic Red Sea. Rifting causes subsidence human evolution is no exception. and fossil evidence suggest that that results in rift valleys, and Earth’s More than a century ago, Darwin between 33 million and 22 million crust adjusts wto this subsidence by saw a link between the African arid years ago hominoids, or apes — a raising rift shoulders on both sides savanna and human evolution, an group that includes gibbons, orang- of the valley. In East Africa, uplift idea that later became popular as the utans, African apes (chimpanzees and of the narrow rift shoulders (tens of “savanna hypothesis.” However, in gorillas) and hominins (ancient and kilometers wide) were superimposed his original theory of natural selec- modern humans) — began to evolve. on the uplift of wide domes (hun- tion, Darwin downplayed the role of Hominins and African apes (partic- dreds of kilometers wide) linked to the physical environment as a mecha- ularly chimps) are closely related. the plume-head pushing from under- nism for evolution, stating instead These two lineages split off between neath. The mode and tempo of these that natural selection could drive evo- 7 million and 4 million years ago, as uplifts in East Africa were anything lutionary changes in the absence of indicated by DNA and fossil evidence. but simple. any change in the physical environ- Most paleoanthropologists agree that Over the past 30 million years, the ment or climate. this split is the most critical juncture plume has created the East African Over the last century, the impact in human evolution, although fos- Rift, a north-south elongated dynamic of geomorphic and climatic change on sil evidence is rare from this period. topography with isolated volcanic evolution, particularly human evolu- Much was happening in Africa at that peaks such as Mount Kilimanjaro. tion, has gained considerable momen- time, however. Rifting occurred in a few places 22 Geotimes January 2008 www.geotimes.org Mediterranean Sea ONIC H Red Sea T Y Nile River C P Saudi Arabia O Red Sea L. Tana E Hadar T T Blue Nile Chad H Africa Middle Awash Yemen Ethiopian Melka E Plateau Kunture Omo S EASTERN BRANCH Gulf of Aden Turkana L. Albert Afar E L. Edward Depression Main Atlantic Ocean Ethiopian L. Kivu S Rift L.Victoria Turkana Lows Olduvai Kenya Indian Ocean Rift L. Tanganyika Laetoli Indian Ocean L. Rukwa Atlantic Ocean Kenya L. Mweru Dome WESTERN BRANCH L. Malawi Uraha N L. Kariba N Kanapoi {M. Royhan Gani{M. Royhan and Nahid DS Gani 500 km N 500 km Elevation 500 km (m) Lakes (L.) 5100 Rivers 4280 Madagascar Karoo Makapansgat Hominin fossil 2680 Plateau sites 1080 Sterkfontein Major rift faults Tuang The north-south oriented Wall of Africa, about 6000 kilometers long and 600 kilometers wide, characterized by a unique and dynamic physiography with plateaus, volcanoes, mountains, deep rift-valleys, freshwater lakes, and vegetation patchwork ranging from closed woodland to desert grassland. Notably, all the early hominin fossil sites of the world, except Chad, are located inside this narrow wall. Perhaps the unique physiography of the wall was the reason for human evolution the way we are now — walking tall and thinking big. throughout East Africa and along the rift floors and dramatic Global Climatic Shifts propagated both northward relief that runs from 156 meters and southward, from the Afar below sea level — Lake Assal in the Over the last 15 million years, region in northern Ethiopia Afar Depression, the lowest point in Earth has experienced a net cool- down almost to South Africa. Africa — to 5,895 meters above sea ing trend superimposed by repeated The result was the formation level at Kilimanjaro, the highest point cooling-and-warming cycles — the so- of the “Wall of Africa,” which in Africa. Although the Wall of Africa called Milankovitch cycles related to is about 6,000 kilometers long started to form around 30 million Earth’s orbital forcing that controls and 600 kilometers wide, and years ago, recent studies show that the planet’s variable dose of solar rises to more than five kilome- most of the uplift occurred between 7 radiation, with periodicities ranging ters high. million and 2 million years ago, just from 20,000 to 100,000 years. The This belt is the largest and about when hominins split off from great ice ages, associated with a drier longest-lived rift in the world, African apes, developed bipedalism climate, started only between 3 mil- punctuated with freshwater lakes and evolved bigger brains. lion and 2.5 million years ago. This present-day vegetation patchwork of East Africa is related to the massive uplift of the Wall of Africa between 7 million and 2 million years ago, an uplift that wrung moisture out of monsoonal air moving across the region and caused progressive aridification of East Africa. {credit} M. Royhan Gani M. Royhan and Nahid DS Gani{credit} www.geotimes.org January 2008 23 Geotimes Because our early ancestors were primar- Thinking Locally ily herbivores, scientists tend to focus heavily on past vegetation changes in East Africa to Léo Laporte and Adrienne Zihlman of the understand early hominin evolution, as altera- University of California at Santa Cruz were the tions in type and distribution of plants would pioneers in linking East African aridification immediately impact an ape’s food system. Using to local tectonics. In 1983, they argued that carbon isotopes, researchers can determine the African uplift and rifting threw the eastern type of vegetation present in a region at a part of the continent into a rain shadow, caus- particular time in the geologic past, such as ing a spread of the savanna and the end of the whether vegetation was wood-dominated or rainforests that had dominated the landscape. grass-dominated. Recent isotopic studies sug- Many subsequent studies have argued essen- gest that an important global shift from wood- tially the same thing. So far, probably the most dominated to grass-dominated ecosystems that convincing case was made by Pierre Sepulchre occurred between 8 million and 4 million years of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de ago was likely related to an increase in aridity l’Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette in France and and, to some extent, fires that cleared out large his team in a recent atmospheric and vegeta- swaths of forest. No doubt these climate and tion modeling study. They found that reduction climate-driven vegetation changes, again at of East African present-day topography by just the right time in the geologic past, were critical one kilometer would permit moist air to circu- in hominin evolution. But were these changes late across the region, increasing rainfall. The that led to a progressive increase of aridity and currently dry and grass-dominated landscape consequential expansion of open grassland, a would thus transform into one of tree-domi- phenomenon known as East African aridifica- nated vegetation. If this rain shadow hypothesis tion, primarily controlled by global (climate) or is correct, the uplift history of the Wall of Africa by local (tectonic) processes? is crucial in assessing East African aridification, and thus human evolutionary changes. Again, the East African Rift uplift occurred sometime over the past 30 million years, with likely the most uplift occurring sometime after 7 million years ago. New research on the Ethiopian Plateau — perhaps the most promi- nent part of the wall and next to a significant hominin fossil site, the Afar rift valley — sug- For survival, these gests that the plateau itself uplifted right in Ethiopian women that time period. Analyzing how fast the Blue walk daily for tens Nile carved a spectacularly deep canyon, a true of kilometers on this rough and dry rival of the Grand Canyon of North America, terrain to collect on the plateau, Nahid Gani and her team found water and trade that the Ethiopian Plateau uplifted more than a foods. Perhaps kilometer between 6 million and 3 million years early hominins ago.
Recommended publications
  • Models and Methods of Tectonic Geomorphology and the Reconstruction of Hominin Landscapes
    This is a repository copy of Landscapes of human evolution : models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/11178/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Bailey, G.N. orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-830X, Reynolds, Sally and King, G.C.P. (2011) Landscapes of human evolution : models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. Journal of Human Evolution. pp. 257-80. ISSN 0047-2484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.004 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ This is an author-created pdf. Cite as: In press, J Hum Evol (2010), doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.004 Landscapes of human evolution: models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes Geoffrey N. Bailey 1 Sally C. Reynolds 2, 3 Geoffrey C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reanalysis of Hominid Phylogeny
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2004 Taxonomical structures of Australopithecus : a reanalysis of hominid phylogeny David Alexander Lukaszek The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lukaszek, David Alexander, "Taxonomical structures of Australopithecus : a reanalysis of hominid phylogeny" (2004). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7081. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7081 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission ______ Author’s Signal Date: uf Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author’s explicit consent. 8/98 TAXONOMICAL STRUCTURES OF AUSTRALOPITHECUS: A REANALYSIS OF HOMINID PHYTOGENY By David Alexander Lukaszek A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Montana November 4, 2004 Approved by: Chairperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP37882 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of the Phylogenetic Value of Molar Cusp Patterns for Australopithecus Paranthropus and Early Homo
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2000 Examination of the phylogenetic value of molar cusp patterns for Australopithecus Paranthropus and early Homo Michael Sperazza The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Sperazza, Michael, "Examination of the phylogenetic value of molar cusp patterns for Australopithecus Paranthropus and early Homo" (2000). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7080. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7080 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of IVIONTANA Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature ** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature D ate ^ 00 Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. An Examination of the Phylogenetic Value of Molar Cusp Patterns for Australopithecus^ Paranthropus and EarlyHomo by Michael Sperazza B.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Reynolds Etal 2011 Author V5 GK.Pages
    Bailey, G.N., Reynolds S.C.and King, G.C.P. 2011. Landscapes of human evolution: models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. Journal of Human Evolution. 60, p257-280 doi:10.1016/jjhevol.2010.01.004. Landscapes and their rela/on to hominin habitats: Case studies from Australopithecus sites in eastern and southern Africa Sally C. Reynolds a,b,*, Geoff N. Bailey c, Geoffrey C.P. King a,c a Laboratoire Tectonique, Instut de Physique du Globe Paris, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France b Instute for Human Evoluon, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, PO WITS, 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa c Department of Archaeology, The King’s Manor, University of York, YO1 7EP, United Kingdom Abstract We examine the links between geomorphological processes, specific landscape features, surface water drainage, and the creaon of suitable habitats for hominins. The existence of mosaic (i.e. heterogeneous) habitats within hominin site landscape reconstrucons is typically explained using models of the riverine and gallery forest sengs, or the pan or lake seng. We propose a different model: the Tectonic Landscape Model (TLM), where tectonic faulng and volcanism disrupts exisng pan or river sengs at small scales (~ 10–25 km). Our model encompasses the interpretaon of the landscape features, the role of tectonics in creang these landscapes, and the implicaons for hominins. In parcular, the model explains the underlying mechanism for the creaon and maintenance of heterogeneous habitats in regions of acve tectonics. We illustrate how areas with faulng and disturbed drainage paderns would have been aracve habitats for hominins, such as Australopithecus, and other fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes and Their Relation to Hominin Habitats : Case Studies from Australopithecus Sites in Eastern and Southern Africa
    This is a repository copy of Landscapes and their relation to hominin habitats : case studies from Australopithecus sites in eastern and southern Africa. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/83719/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Reynolds, S.C., Bailey, Geoff orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-830X and King, G.C.P. (2011) Landscapes and their relation to hominin habitats : case studies from Australopithecus sites in eastern and southern Africa. Journal of Human Evolution. pp. 281-98. ISSN 0047- 2484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.001 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Bailey, G.N., Reynolds S.C.and King, G.C.P. 2011. Landscapes of human evolution: models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. Journal of Human Evolution. 60, p257-280 doi:10.1016/jjhevol.2010.01.004. Landscapes and their rela/on t0)+01inin habitats: Case)%tudie%)6rom) Australopithecus)%,*es in eastern and southern Africa Sally C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10- Early Hominid Origins and Evolution: the Roots of Humanity
    Chapter 10- Early Hominid Origins and Evolution: The Roots of Humanity 1 1. What is a Hominid? a. Bipedal Locomotion: Getting Around on Two Feet i. Evolved before large brain size ii. Walking on two limbs (with associated skeletal changes) b. Nonhoning Chewing: No Slicing, Mainly Grinding i. Refers to the way the mouth processes food ii. Lack of projecting canine, diastema iii. More pressure on front portion of chewing muscles 2 2. Why Did Hominids Emerge? Three Hypotheses a. Charles Darwin’s Hunting Hypothesis i. Bipedalism had freed the hands for carrying weapons. ii. Intelligence increased; size of canines diminished. iii. Tool production and use essential for development of human intelligence. iv. New evidence shows this not to be the case. b. Peter Rodman and Henry McHenry’s Patchy Forest Hypothesis i. Human origins and bipedalism related to the greater efficiency in some habitats of moving on two limbs rather than four. ii. Bipedalism arose in areas where forests were fragmented and food resources also became scattered. iii. As forests fragmented, bipedalism freed the hands to pick up food allowing for both tree and ground food resources to be exploited. 3 2. Why Did Hominids Emerge? Three Hypotheses (cont’d) c. Owen Lovejoy’s Provisioning Hypothesis i. Freeing the hands was important in allowing males to assist females more efficiently in procuring food; thus “provisioning” acted as a form of sexual competition among males for females. ii. Birth spacing would also be reduced, since females would have to move around less and would have access to greater food resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on the Legacy of William White Howells (1908-2005) LR Godfrey
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Anthropology Department Faculty Publication Anthropology Series 2008 From the Shoulders of a Giant: Perspectives on the Legacy of William White Howells (1908-2005) LR Godfrey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Godfrey, LR, "From the Shoulders of a Giant: Perspectives on the Legacy of William White Howells (1908-2005)" (2008). Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. 130. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_faculty_pubs/130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From the Shoulders of a Giant: Perspectives on the Legacy of William White Howells (1908–2005) Laurie R. Godfrey ABSTRACT : William White Howells was one of the intellectual giants of the discipline of biological anthropology during the twentieth century. He was a devoted student of Earnest A. Hooton; yet he played a central role in directing the discipline away from the typological thinking that infused the work of his predecessor, and toward the population perspective that characterizes the field today. An original and productive scholar with diverse interests, his influence was extraordinary not merely because of his brilliance, but also because of the kind of mentor he was. Almost two dozen graduate students, and countless others with whom he interacted in various capacities, have carried Howells’ legacy into the twenty-first century. PORTRAIT OF A GIANT He was an intellectual powerhouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Bipedalism: 1
    Evolution of Bipedalism: 1 Bipedalism Kevin D. Hunt Department of Anthropology Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405 Phone: (812) 855 2555 Among living primates, only humans are bipedal. It is not certain when this unique feature emerged, but it must have been before the 3.6 million-year-old Laetoli footprints were made. Although the prints were not made by completely modern feet, they are unequivocally the prints of bipeds. They are the impressions of feet that lacked a distinctive human rounded ball, or swelling, at the base of the great toe, that had no well-defined arch, and that retained ever so slightly divergent great toes. Somewhat later in time, the well- known 2.9 million year old Australopithecus afarensis Lucy fossil is the earliest human ancestor to display the clear skeletal hallmarks of bipedalism. Earlier fossils are either not yet described, or lack the two most diagnostic parts, the pelvis and the distal (i.e. lower) femur. Despite the paucity of fossils near the beginning of the human lineage, most paleontologists regard bipedalism as the earliest distinctively human feature to have evolved in hominins. “Hominin” refers to members of the taxonomic family Homininae, which consists of human ancestors and collateral species after the lineage split from that leading to chimpanzees. In great apes, the pelvis is vertically elongated so that it makes up much of the back (see Figure 1), leaving the back somewhat inflexible. The human pelvis is vertically short and shaped like a bowl with an open bottom, the opening being the pelvic inlet or birth canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 24. ORIGIN of the HUMAN ADAPTIVE PATTERN
    Chapter 24. ORIGIN OF THE HUMAN ADAPTIVE PATTERN Contrast the title of this book by Charles Darwin: The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex with this book by Jacob Bronowski: The Ascent of Man I. Introduction Over the span of time from about 5.5 million BP until about 50,000 BP the hominid line evolved from something very like a chimpanzee to a biologically modern species es- sentially like ourselves. The objectives of this chapter are to describe the basic differences between humans and our primate relatives, and to introduce you to the data and hypotheses that are available to explain the origin of the human species. In essence, we would like to be able to explain the hunting and gathering “revolution”—the emergence of a (presumably adaptive) pattern of human behavior that is rather distinctively different from that of apes. Even the simplest human societies we can study today are sharply different from the soci- eties of our closest primate relatives. What sort of micro- and macro-evolutionary processes can we use to account for this development that began perhaps 6 million years ago? With quite some anatomical data on our ancestors, but barely any behavioral data, there is plenty of room to mythologize. The work of the Leakey family, Donald Johanson, Tim White, Henry McHenry and many others have made the bones and stone tools of these people fairly well known. Roger Lewin (1987b) and Richard Klein (1989) survey the main findings. We have a fairly good outline of how our bodies evolved, although new fossil dis- coveries require major rewrites of parts of the story every year.
    [Show full text]