DOCSLIB.ORG

(Mont Avic Natural Park, North-Western Italy): Soil Properties and Their Relationships with Substrate, Vegetation and Biological Activity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Mont Avic Natural Park, North-Western Italy): Soil Properties and Their Relationships with Substrate, Vegetation and Biological Activity Michele E. D’Amico Soil ecology and pedogenesis on ophiolitic materials in the western Alps (Mont Avic Natural Park, North-western Italy): soil properties and their relationships with substrate, vegetation and biological activity. Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Dottorato di Ricerca in Scienze Ambientali XXII ciclo Novembre 2009 2 Michele E. D’Amico Soil ecology and pedogenesis on ophiolitic materials in the western Alps (Mont Avic Natural Park, North-western Italy): soil properties and their relationships with substrate, vegetation and biological activity. Tutor: Prof Franco Previtali Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Dottorato di Ricerca in Scienze Ambientali XXII ciclo Novembre 2009 3 Summary Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 8 1 – Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Why studying soils on ophiolites: the “serpentine factor” ......................................................... 9 1.2 Plant-soil relationships: the ecology of soils formed on serpentinite ...................................... 10 1.3 Soil forming processes on ultramafic materials ....................................................................... 11 1.4 The study area .......................................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Aims and structure. .................................................................................................................. 14 References ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2. Edaphic influences on vegetation of ophiolitic substrates ............................................................. 17 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 17 2.2. Materials and methods ............................................................................................................ 18 2.2.1. Field data collection and soil sampling ............................................................................ 18 2.2.2. Laboratory analysis .......................................................................................................... 18 2.2.3. Data analysis .................................................................................................................... 19 2.3. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.1. The vegetation .................................................................................................................. 20 2.3.2. The soils ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.3. Soil-vegetation relationships ............................................................................................ 22 2.3.4. Notes on some species ..................................................................................................... 23 2.4. Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.1. Forest habitats .................................................................................................................. 23 2.4.2. Alpine habitats ................................................................................................................. 25 2.5. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 26 References ...................................................................................................................................... 27 3. Podzolization over ophiolitic materials .......................................................................................... 34 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 34 3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 34 3.2. Physiographic outlines of the study area................................................................................. 35 3.3. Materials and methods ............................................................................................................ 35 3.3.1. Soil description and sampling .......................................................................................... 35 3.3.2. Laboratory analyses: soil chemistry and spodic properties ............................................. 35 3.3.3. Laboratory analyses: soil mineralogy and parent material .............................................. 36 3.4. Results and discussion ............................................................................................................ 36 3.4.1. Parent material ................................................................................................................. 36 3.4.2. Morphological and physical properties of soil profiles ................................................... 37 3.4.3. Humus forms .................................................................................................................... 38 3.4.4. Chemical properties ......................................................................................................... 38 3.4.5. Bulk chemical composition .............................................................................................. 38 3.4.6. Extractable forms of Fe, Al and Si and their meaning (Table 3.8) .................................. 39 3.4.7. Spodicity indexes ............................................................................................................. 40 3.4.8. Soil classification ............................................................................................................. 41 5. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 41 References ...................................................................................................................................... 43 4: Podzolization over ophiolitic materials: weathering and clay minerals ........................................ 51 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 51 4.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 51 4 4.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................................................. 52 4.3 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 53 4.3.1 Parent material .................................................................................................................. 53 4.3.2 Mass transport calculations ............................................................................................... 54 4.3.3 Granulometric evolution ................................................................................................... 55 4.3.4 Clay minerals .................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.5 Magnetic minerals ............................................................................................................. 56 4.3.6 Allophanic materials ......................................................................................................... 57 4.3.8: IR measurements .............................................................................................................. 57 4.4 Discussion and conclusions ..................................................................................................... 58 Bibliography................................................................................................................................... 60 5. Heavy metal speciation and mobility along altitudinal gradients on ophiolites. ........................... 69 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 69 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 69 5.2 The studied soil profiles ........................................................................................................... 70 5.3 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................... 71 5.4 Results ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Soil Survey
    The Soil Survey The soil survey delineates the basal soil pattern of an area and characterises each kind of soil so that the response to changes can be assessed and used as a basis for prediction. Although in an economic climate it is necessarily made for some practical purpose, it is not subordinated to the parti­ cular need of the moment, but is conducted in a scientific way that provides basal information of general application and eliminates the necessity for a resurvey whenever a new problem arises. It supplies information that can be combined, analysed, or amplified for many practical purposes, but the purpose should not be allowed to modify the method of survey in any fundamental way. According to the degree of detail required, soil surveys in New Zealand are classed as general, . district, or detailed. General surveys produce sufficient detail for a final map on the scale of 4 miles to an inch (1 :253440); they show the main sets of soils and their general relation to land forms; they are an aid to investigations and planning on the regional or national scale. District surveys, for maps, on the scale of 2 miles to an inch (1: 126720), show soil types or, where the pattern is detailed, combinations of types; they are designed to show the soil pattern in sufficient detail to allow the study of local soil problems and to provide a basis for assembling and distributing information in many fields such as agriculture, forestry, and engineering. Detailed surveys, mostiy for maps on the scale of 40 chains to an inch (1 :31680), delineate soil types and land-use phases, and show the soil pattern in relation to farm boundaries and subdivisional fences.
    [Show full text]
  • Tillage and Soil Ecology: Partners for Sustainable Agriculture
    Soil & Tillage Research 111 (2010) 33–40 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Soil & Tillage Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/still Review Tillage and soil ecology: Partners for sustainable agriculture Jean Roger-Estrade a,b,*, Christel Anger b, Michel Bertrand b, Guy Richard c a AgroParisTech, UMR 211 INRA/AgroParisTech., Thiverval-Grignon, 78850, France b INRA, UMR 211 INRA/AgroParisTech. Thiverval-Grignon, 78850, France c INRA, UR 0272 Science du sol, Centre de recherche d’Orle´ans, Orle´ans, 45075, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Much of the biodiversity of agroecosystems lies in the soil. The functions performed by soil biota have Tillage major direct and indirect effects on crop growth and quality, soil and residue-borne pests, diseases Soil ecology incidence, the quality of nutrient cycling and water transfer, and, thus, on the sustainability of crop Agroecosystems management systems. Farmers use tillage, consciously or inadvertently, to manage soil biodiversity. Soil biota Given the importance of soil biota, one of the key challenges in tillage research is understanding and No tillage Plowing predicting the effects of tillage on soil ecology, not only for assessments of the impact of tillage on soil organisms and functions, but also for the design of tillage systems to make the best use of soil biodiversity, particularly for crop protection. In this paper, we first address the complexity of soil ecosystems, the descriptions of which vary between studies, in terms of the size of organisms, the structure of food webs and functions. We then examine the impact of tillage on various groups of soil biota, outlining, through examples, the crucial effects of tillage on population dynamics and species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Ecology
    LSC 322 Laboratory 10 LAB #10: SOIL ECOLOGY Soil is one of the earth’s most important resources. For a community of plants and animals to become established on land, soil must first be present. Further, soil quality is often a limiting factor for growth many systems. Soil is a complex mixture of inorganic and organic materials, microorganisms, water and air. The weathering of bedrock produces small grains of rock that accumulate as a layer on the surface of the earth. There they are altered by biology, becoming mixed with organic matter, which results from the decomposition of the waste products and dead tissue of living organisms to form humus. The soil formation process is very slow (hundreds to thousands of years), so it can be very detrimental to a community if the soil is lost through erosion or its quality degraded by pollution or misuse. Soil Sampling As a class, we will identify interesting soil ecosystems on campus that we would like to examine further. Your small group will be assigned to collect one of those samples. Using a trowel, you will scoop the top 5 cm (this is where most of the biological “action” happens) into a ziplock bag. Also, take notes to record the environmental surroundings. What is the land usage? What plants are growing here? What is the soil moisture? These environmental characteristics will influence many aspects of the soil. Questions - Describe the environment from which you took your soil sample. Include all of the information from your notes. - How do these conditions relate to the soil characteristics measured during the lab exercise (texture, nutrients, pH, and biota)? After samples are collected, we will return to the lab and measure the following characteristics: Soil Texture Soil texture refers to the proportion of sand, silt, and clay present in a soil, which differ in their particle size.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Serpentine
    CALIFORNIA'S SERPENTINE by Art Kruckeberg Serpentine Rock Traditional teaching in geology tells us that rocks Californians boast of their world-class tallest and can be divided into three major categories—igneous, oldest trees, highest mountain and deepest valley; but metamorphic, and sedimentary. The igneous rocks, that "book of records" can claim another first for the formed by cooling from molten rock called magma, state. California, a state with the richest geological are broadly classified as mafic or silicic depending tapestry on the continent, also has the largest exposures mainly on the amount of magnesium and iron or silica of serpentine rock in North America. Indeed, this present. Serpentine is called an ultramafic rock because unique and colorful rock, so abundantly distributed of the presence of unusually large amounts of around the state, is California's state rock. For magnesium and iron. Igneous rocks, particularly those botanists, the most dramatic attribute of serpentine is that originate within the earth's crust, above the its highly selective, demanding influence on plant life. mantle, contain small but significant amounts of The unique flora growing on serpentine in California illustrates the ecological truism that though regional climate controls overall plant distribution, regional Views of the classic serpentine areas at New Idria in San Benito County. The upper photo was taken in 1932, the lower in 1960 geology controls local plant diversity. Geology is used of the same view; no evident change in 28 years. Photos here in its broad sense to include land forms, rocks courtesy of the U.S. Forest Service and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil As a Huge Laboratory for Microorganisms
    Research Article Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J Volume 22 Issue 4 - September 2019 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Mishra BB DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.22.556205 Soil as a Huge Laboratory for Microorganisms Sachidanand B1, Mitra NG1, Vinod Kumar1, Richa Roy2 and Mishra BB3* 1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India 2Department of Biotechnology, TNB College, India 3Haramaya University, Ethiopia Submission: June 24, 2019; Published: September 17, 2019 *Corresponding author: Mishra BB, Haramaya University, Ethiopia Abstract Biodiversity consisting of living organisms both plants and animals, constitute an important component of soil. Soil organisms are important elements for preserved ecosystem biodiversity and services thus assess functional and structural biodiversity in arable soils is interest. One of the main threats to soil biodiversity occurred by soil environmental impacts and agricultural management. This review focuses on interactions relating how soil ecology (soil physical, chemical and biological properties) and soil management regime affect the microbial diversity in soil. We propose that the fact that in some situations the soil is the key factor determining soil microbial diversity is related to the complexity of the microbial interactions in soil, including interactions between microorganisms (MOs) and soil. A conceptual framework, based on the relative strengths of the shaping forces exerted by soil versus the ecological behavior of MOs, is proposed. Plant-bacterial interactions in the rhizosphere are the determinants of plant health and soil fertility. Symbiotic nitrogen (N2)-fixing bacteria include the cyanobacteria of the genera Rhizobium, Free-livingBradyrhizobium, soil bacteria Azorhizobium, play a vital Allorhizobium, role in plant Sinorhizobium growth, usually and referred Mesorhizobium.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Crop and Soil Science. a Blacksburg. Agricultural
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 098 289 CB 002 33$ AUTHOR Miller, Larry E. TITLE What Is Soil? Advanced Crop and Soil Science. A Course of Study. INSTITUTION Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. Agricultural Education Program.; Virginia State Dept. of Education, Richmond. Agricultural Education Service. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 42p.; For related courses of study, see CE 002 333-337 and CE 003 222 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Agricultural Education; *Agronomy; Behavioral Objectives; Conservation (Environment); Course Content; Course Descriptions; *Curriculum Guides; Ecological Factors; Environmental Education; *Instructional Materials; Lesson Plans; Natural Resources; Post Sc-tondary Education; Secondary Education; *Soil Science IDENTIFIERS Virginia ABSTRACT The course of study represents the first of six modules in advanced crop and soil science and introduces the griculture student to the topic of soil management. Upon completing the two day lesson, the student vill be able to define "soil", list the soil forming agencies, define and use soil terminology, and discuss soil formation and what makes up the soil complex. Information and directions necessary to make soil profiles are included for the instructor's use. The course outline suggests teaching procedures, behavioral objectives, teaching aids and references, problems, a summary, and evaluation. Following the lesson plans, pages are coded for use as handouts and overhead transparencies. A materials source list for the complete soil module is included. (MW) Agdex 506 BEST COPY AVAILABLE LJ US DEPARTMENT OFmrAITM E nufAT ION t WE 1. F ARE MAT IONAI. ItiST ifuf I OF EDuCATiCiN :),t; tnArh, t 1.t PI-1, t+ h 4t t wt 44t F.,.."11 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Accumulation for 61 Years After Agricultural Abandonment
    Ecology, 81(1), 2000, pp. 88±98 q 2000 by the Ecological Society of America DYNAMICS OF SOIL NITROGEN AND CARBON ACCUMULATION FOR 61 YEARS AFTER AGRICULTURAL ABANDONMENT JOHANNES M. H. KNOPS1 AND DAVID TILMAN Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 USA Abstract. We used two independent methods to determine the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen following abandonment of agricultural ®elds on a Minnesota sand plain. First, we used a chronosequence of 19 ®elds abandoned from 1927 to 1982 to infer soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Second, we directly observed dynamics of carbon and nitrogen over a 12-yr period in 1900 permanent plots in these ®elds. These observed dynamics were used in a differential equation model to predict soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics. The two methods yielded similar results. Resampling the 1900 plots showed that the rates of accumulation of nitrogen and carbon over 12 yr depended on ambient carbon and nitrogen levels in the soil, with rates of accumulation declining at higher carbon and nitrogen levels. A dynamic model ®tted to the observed rates of change predicted logistic dynamics for nitrogen and carbon accumulation. On average, agricultural practices resulted in a 75% loss of soil nitrogen and an 89% loss of soil carbon at the time of abandonment. Recovery to 95% of the preagricultural levels is predicted to require 180 yr for nitrogen and 230 yr for carbon. This model accurately predicted the soil carbon, nitrogen, and carbon : nitrogen ratio patterns observed in the chronosequence of old ®elds, suggesting that the chronose- quence may be indicative of actual changes in soil carbon and nitrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systemic Approach for Modeling Soil Functions
    SOIL, 4, 83–92, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-83-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under SOIL the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A systemic approach for modeling soil functions Hans-Jörg Vogel1,5, Stephan Bartke1, Katrin Daedlow2, Katharina Helming2, Ingrid Kögel-Knabner3, Birgit Lang4, Eva Rabot1, David Russell4, Bastian Stößel1, Ulrich Weller1, Martin Wiesmeier3, and Ute Wollschläger1 1Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 2Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany 3TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Straße 2, 85354 Freising, Germany 4Senckenberg Museum of Natural History, Sonnenplan 7, 02826 Görlitz, Germany 5Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 3, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany Correspondence: Hans-Jörg Vogel ([email protected]) Received: 13 September 2017 – Discussion started: 4 October 2017 Revised: 2 February 2018 – Accepted: 14 February 2018 – Published: 15 March 2018 Abstract. The central importance of soil for the functioning of terrestrial systems is increasingly recognized. Critically relevant for water quality, climate control, nutrient cycling and biodiversity, soil provides more func- tions than just the basis for agricultural production. Nowadays, soil is increasingly under pressure as a limited resource for the production of food, energy and raw materials. This has led to an increasing demand for concepts assessing soil functions so that they can be adequately considered in decision-making aimed at sustainable soil management. The various soil science disciplines have progressively developed highly sophisticated methods to explore the multitude of physical, chemical and biological processes in soil.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era of Digital Soil Mapping Across Forested Landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ B, Grant M
    CHAPTER A new era of digital soil mapping across forested landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ b, Grant M. Domkec aBC Ministry Forests Lands Natural Resource Operations Rural Development, Vernon, BC, Canada, bNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada, cNorthern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, United States *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Soil maps provide essential information for forest management, and a recent transformation of the map making process through digital soil mapping (DSM) is providing much improved soil information compared to what was available through traditional mapping methods. The improvements include higher resolution soil data for greater mapping extents, and incorporating a wide range of environmental factors to predict soil classes and attributes, along with a better understanding of mapping uncertainties. In this chapter, we provide a brief introduction to the concepts and methods underlying the digital soil map, outline the current state of DSM as it relates to forestry and global change, and provide some examples of how DSM can be applied to evaluate soil changes in response to multiple stressors. Throughout the chapter, we highlight the immense potential of DSM, but also describe some of the challenges that need to be overcome to truly realize this potential. Those challenges include finding ways to provide additional field data to train models and validate results, developing a group of highly skilled people with combined abilities in computational science and pedology, as well as the ongoing need to encourage communi- cation between the DSM community, land managers and decision makers whose work we believe can benefit from the new information provided by DSM.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals in Soil Science Course a Course Offered by the Soil Science Society of America
    Fundamentals in Soil Science Course A course offered by the Soil Science Society of America. This course is divided into six modules: Fundamentals of Soil Genesis, Classification, and Morphology, Fundamentals in Soil Chemistry and Mineralogy, Fundamentals in Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management, Soil Biology and Soil Ecology, Influences and Management of Soil Physical Properties and Soil and Land Use Management. Each module contains 2 lessons. Lectures are approximately two hours. To maximize learning, students will be expected to spend time reading and studying outside of the recorded lesson. Course Description The Soil Science Fundamentals Review Course is designed to provide an overview of the fundamental concepts in soil science: Genesis, Classification and Morphology, Physics, Chemistry, Fertility, Biology, and Land Use. Instructors will use the Fundamentals Performance Objectives (POs) as a guide for discussing topics within each section, but will not go through each objective individually. However, students are encouraged to ask questions regarding specific POs if needed. The objective of the course is to provide the student with a formalized way to build their fundamental knowledge and skills within the different areas of soil science to enhance their professional skills and/or to prepare to take the Fundamentals of Soil Science Exam. Lecture material is supplemented with additional readings and practical examples to illustrate the concepts and provide practical examples of how the concepts are used in practice. This course is not designed to teach a student how to take the Fundamentals Exam, but instead is designed to complement the students existing knowledge of soil science and help the student understand the principles behind the POs.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 2.3, Soil Biology and Ecology
    2.3 Soil Biology and Ecology Introduction 85 Lecture 1: Soil Biology and Ecology 87 Demonstration 1: Organic Matter Decomposition in Litter Bags Instructor’s Demonstration Outline 101 Step-by-Step Instructions for Students 103 Demonstration 2: Soil Respiration Instructor’s Demonstration Outline 105 Step-by-Step Instructions for Students 107 Demonstration 3: Assessing Earthworm Populations as Indicators of Soil Quality Instructor’s Demonstration Outline 111 Step-by-Step Instructions for Students 113 Demonstration 4: Soil Arthropods Instructor’s Demonstration Outline 115 Assessment Questions and Key 117 Resources 119 Appendices 1. Major Organic Components of Typical Decomposer 121 Food Sources 2. Litter Bag Data Sheet 122 3. Litter Bag Data Sheet Example 123 4. Soil Respiration Data Sheet 124 5. Earthworm Data Sheet 125 6. Arthropod Data Sheet 126 Part 2 – 84 | Unit 2.3 Soil Biology & Ecology Introduction: Soil Biology & Ecology UNIT OVERVIEW MODES OF INSTRUCTION This unit introduces students to the > LECTURE (1 LECTURE, 1.5 HOURS) biological properties and ecosystem The lecture covers the basic biology and ecosystem pro- processes of agricultural soils. cesses of soils, focusing on ways to improve soil quality for organic farming and gardening systems. The lecture reviews the constituents of soils > DEMONSTRATION 1: ORGANIC MATTER DECOMPOSITION and the physical characteristics and soil (1.5 HOURS) ecosystem processes that can be managed to In Demonstration 1, students will learn how to assess the improve soil quality. Demonstrations and capacity of different soils to decompose organic matter. exercises introduce students to techniques Discussion questions ask students to reflect on what envi- used to assess the biological properties of ronmental and management factors might have influenced soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles, and the Creation of New Soil Habitats in Other Scientific fields Who Also Made Early Contributions Through the Weathering of Rocks (Puente Et Al., 2004)
    Editorial SOIL, 1, 117–129, 2015 www.soil-journal.net/1/117/2015/ doi:10.5194/soil-1-117-2015 SOIL © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The interdisciplinary nature of SOIL E. C. Brevik1, A. Cerdà2, J. Mataix-Solera3, L. Pereg4, J. N. Quinton5, J. Six6, and K. Van Oost7 1Department of Natural Sciences, Dickinson State University, Dickinson, ND, USA 2Departament de Geografia, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain 3GEA-Grupo de Edafología Ambiental , Departamento de Agroquímica y Medio Ambiente, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, Edificio Alcudia, Elche, Alicante, Spain 4School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia 5Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK 6Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Tannenstrasse 1, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 7Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Correspondence to: J. Six ([email protected]) Received: 26 August 2014 – Published in SOIL Discuss.: 23 September 2014 Revised: – – Accepted: 23 December 2014 – Published: 16 January 2015 Abstract. The holistic study of soils requires an interdisciplinary approach involving biologists, chemists, ge- ologists, and physicists, amongst others, something that has been true from the earliest days of the field. In more recent years this list has grown to include anthropologists, economists, engineers, medical professionals, military professionals, sociologists, and even artists. This approach has been strengthened and reinforced as cur- rent research continues to use experts trained in both soil science and related fields and by the wide array of issues impacting the world that require an in-depth understanding of soils.
    [Show full text]