DOCSLIB.ORG

Behavioural Interventions to Remediate Learning Disorders: a Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Behavioural Interventions to Remediate Learning Disorders: a Technical Report Behavioural Interventions to Remediate Learning Disorders: A Technical Report 23 March 2015 George Dawson & Stephanie D'Souza Supervised by: Dr. David Moreau PhD & A/Prof. Karen Waldie PhD Centre for Brain Research and School of Psychology The University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand Contact: [email protected] Behavioural interventions to remediate learning disorders: A technical report TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 II Audited Programmes .............................................................................................. 4 A Arrowsmith Programme ........................................................................................ 4 B Brain Gym ........................................................................................................... 8 C Cellfield ............................................................................................................. 17 D Cogmed Working Memory Training ........................................................................ 21 E Coloured Overlays and Lenses (including those from Irlen and The Institute of Optometry) ............................................................................................................. 30 F Danks Davis Dyslexia Tutoring .............................................................................. 34 G Davis Dyslexia .................................................................................................... 35 H Dore Programme ................................................................................................. 41 I Fast ForWord ....................................................................................................... 46 J Lexia Reading ...................................................................................................... 60 K Lumosity ............................................................................................................ 78 L Orton-Gillingham ................................................................................................. 93 M The Slingerland Approach, as used in New Zealand by The Learning Key .................. 100 N Steps .............................................................................................................. 102 O The Tomatis Method for Auditory Retraining ......................................................... 107 III Omitted Programmes .......................................................................................... 120 IV Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 124 2 Dawson, D’Souza, Moreau, Waldie – MovinCog.org I INTRODUCTION Learning disorders such as dyslexia, dyscalculia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can present significant challenges for children, parents, and educators. Combined, these disorders impair learning in as many as one in five children, with sometimes devastating repercussions for numerous aspects of their lives. Much knowledge has been gained recently by studying the neural correlates of such learning disorders, leading to the identification of specific neural networks that are altered in impaired learning (although questions remain regarding the causal links between these changes in neural activity and changes in behaviour). Quite logically, advances in the scientific understanding of these disorders have paved the way for cognitive remediation programmes aiming to alleviate behavioural symptoms by targeting their underlying mechanisms. Although we believe this endeavour should be praised, marketed programmes often lack sufficient scientific evidence to back up their claims. This is prejudicial to individuals and institutions investing time and money into interventions that may not lead to the intended results. In this report, we assess with a critical eye a selection of current popular remediation programmes. For each intervention we discuss, we provide an overview of the training tools and report on the strength of the evidence available at this time. Note that we do not have any financial involvement with these programmes, which means that there is no conflict of interest surrounding the statements reported here. Finally, we want to emphasise that none of the sections in this report are definitive. Science is a collaborative enterprise, moving forward collectively, and we make no specific predictions regarding the future of each programme. Rather, as we mentioned, we have assessed and synthesised the evidence currently available to us in order to help parents, educators and policy-makers reach better, more informed conclusions. 3 Behavioural interventions to remediate learning disorders: A technical report II AUDITED PROGRAMMES A Arrowsmith Programme Website / for more information see: http://www.arrowsmithschool.org/arrowsmithprogram/index.html What it involves: Arrowsmith offers a three to four year for-profit programme which replaces regular school tuition. It was developed by Barbara Arrowsmith-Young, author of The Woman Who Changed Her Brain. Its goal is to address the root causes of learning disabilities rather than managing their symptoms. Ostensibly the programme and its exercises are based on research in neuroscience, particularly on the principle of neuroplasticity and localisation of functions as described by A.R. Luria. The Arrowsmith programme is delivered in a school setting by specially trained teachers. Arrowsmith mandates a teacher:student ratio of one Arrowsmith teacher to approximately 10 students. The overall class size can, however, exceed 10 students, so long as the appropriate teacher:student ratio is maintained. Arrowsmith education begins with an individual online assessment process which takes approximately one day. Each student’s results are submitted to Arrowsmith, which creates an ‘Individual Learning Profile’ for the student, identifying their strengths and weaknesses. Once a student’s Individual Learning Profile has been created, he or she then spends approximately four periods per day, five days a week performing Arrowsmith cognitive exercises. These include computer, auditory and pen and paper exercises. The rest of the school day is usually devoted to more traditional English and mathematics teaching. The extent to which more traditional teaching is involved depends on curriculum regulations and individual students’ needs. Each student’s progress is tracked monthly on a web-based system, and a full year-end reassessment is carried out to update the student’s Individual Learning Profile. What claims does the company make / what does the programme target? Relatively bold claims are made in support of the Arrowsmith programme. In its programme brochure it is stated that “[u]pon completion, and with the attendant improved cognitive capacities, students are able to participate in a full academic curriculum at their appropriate grade level without the need for resource support or curriculum modification” (Arrowsmith, 2010, p. 5) Arrowsmith is not free and so details about its remediation processes are not available to the public. However, based on Arrowsmith-Young’s (2013) book The Woman Who Changed Her Brain, the programme seems to identify and target the following deficits: (1) Motor Symbol Sequencing — said to involve the premotor region of the left hemisphere of the brain, and enable us to learn motor plans to consistently and sequentially produce a set of symbols (e.g., alphabet letters or numbers). This is remedied by a tracing exercise using pen and paper, where the student is to wear an eye patch over his or her left eye apparently to stimulate the left-hemisphere 4 Dawson, D’Souza, Moreau, Waldie – MovinCog.org motor area. After remediation, the student may show improved reading tracking and potentially even an improved ability to use binocular vision cues. (2) Symbol Relations — said to involve the juncture of the occipital-parietal-temporal areas in the left hemisphere of the brain. A deficit in this area may show itself as a propensity to reverse letters (b/d, p/q) and find it difficult to read an analogue clock. Grammar (especially prepositions) may also be difficult to understand. The Arrowsmith programme seems to target this deficit with the ‘clocks’ exercise, where the student must input via a keyboard the time displayed on a computer-drawn clock, which may have many different (certainly more than three) hands. There are apparently fourteen different rules to the clocks exercise. (3) Memory for Information or Instructions — said to involve the temporal region of the left hemisphere of the brain. This deficit shows itself as difficulty in remembering and following lectures and conversations or instructions. These may have to be repeated several times before someone with this deficit can retain them. The deficit is remedied by an auditory exercise where the student must listen over and over to song lyrics until he or she can repeat them. The lyrics to be remembered get progressively more complex as the exercise continues. (4) Predicative Speech — a deficit in which means you cannot learn the rules governing sentence structure, leading to a propensity to speak and write in short sentences. This deficit may further make it difficult to anticipate the consequences of words and actions and so someone suffering from it may appear to be rude or lacking tact. It is remediated through an auditory exercise where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Voice of Parents Who Have Used Rhythmic Movement Training with Their Child
    The voice of parents who have used Rhythmic Movement Training with their child A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Education University of Canterbury College of Education, Health and Human Development Tessa M Grigg 2016 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... V ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ VI CHAPTER 1. WHY RESEARCH RETAINED PRIMITIVE REFLEXES? ....................................... 1 1.1. AN INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Aim of the project ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2. Research questions .............................................................................................................. 2 1.1.3. Researcher interest in the topic and pre-study understandings ....................................... 2 1.2. REFLEXES DEFINED ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3. INTRODUCTION SUMMARY ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orton-Gillingham Or Multisensory Structured Language Approaches
    JUST THE FACTS... Information provided by The International Dyslexia Association® ORTON-GILLINGHAM-BASED AND/OR MULTISENSORY STRUCTURED LANGUAGE APPROACHES The principles of instruction and content of a Syntax: Syntax is the set of principles that dictate the multisensory structured language program are essential sequence and function of words in a sentence in order for effective teaching methodologies. The International to convey meaning. This includes grammar, sentence Dyslexia Association (IDA) actively promotes effective variation, and the mechanics of language. teaching approaches and related clinical educational Semantics: Semantics is that aspect of language intervention strategies for dyslexics. concerned with meaning. The curriculum (from the beginning) must include instruction in the CONTENT: What Is Taught comprehension of written language. Phonology and Phonological Awareness: Phonology is the study of sounds and how they work within their environment. A phoneme is the smallest unit of sound PRINCIPLES OF INSTRUCTION: How It Is Taught in a given language that can be recognized as being Simultaneous, Multisensory (VAKT): Teaching is distinct from other sounds in the language. done using all learning pathways in the brain Phonological awareness is the understanding of the (visual/auditory, kinesthetic-tactile) simultaneously in internal linguistic structure of words. An important order to enhance memory and learning. aspect of phonological awareness is phonemic awareness or the ability to segment words into their Systematic and Cumulative: Multisensory language component sounds. instruction requires that the organization of material follows the logical order of the language. The Sound-Symbol Association: This is the knowledge of sequence must begin with the easiest and most basic the various sounds in the English language and their elements and progress methodically to more difficult correspondence to the letters and combinations of material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of a New System of Haploscopic Coloured Filters on Rate of Reading and Visual Fatigue in Dyslexics Dr. David Harris D
    The Effect of a New System of Haploscopic Coloured Filters on Rate of Reading and Visual Fatigue in Dyslexics Dr. David Harris Dr. John Downes Dr. Richard Latto School of Psychology, Liverpool University Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA 1 Abstract A new system for prescribing haploscopic (i.e. different for the two eyes) coloured filters, mounted as spectacle lenses, is described. It concentrates on the blue, short wavelength end of the spectrum in order to identify the optimal filters more accurately. Reading with the prescribed filters was compared with baseline performance, in a balanced design using the Wilkins Rate of Reading Test (WRRT), in a group of 73 dyslexic participants. The filters produced a 35% increase in reading rate, a substantial improvement on the only previous study prescribing haploscopic lenses which used lenses spread equally across the full spectrum (Harris and MacRow-hill (1999). In the present study, there was a strong inverse correlation between individuals’ baseline reading rates and their proportional improvement when wearing the filters, indicating that at least part of the effect of the filters was specific to their dyslexia rather than being due to a general facilitation of reading rates in all participants. As part of the balanced testing design, the WRRT was given twice, in each case for two minutes. Comparing the performance, again using transformed data to give a proportional change, between the first and second minutes of each test showed no change over the first test. However, there was a deterioration in performance over the second test for the group without filters but not for the group wearing filters.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Literacy Intervention on Achievement Outcomes of Children with Developmental Language Disorders: a Systematic Review
    Impact of Literacy Intervention on Achievement Outcomes of Children With Developmental Language Disorders: A Systematic Review Jaumeiko J. Coleman and Rebecca A. Venediktov National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD Gary A. Troia Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI Beverly P. Wang National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD ASHA’s National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders • July 2013 ABSTRACT The American Speech-Language-Hearing Purpose: In this systematic review, the Association’s National Center for Evidence- authors examined the impact of literacy Based Practice (N-CEP) was charged with intervention on achievement outcomes of developing an evidence-based systematic school-age children with developmental review (EBSR) of studies reporting on the language disorders. impact of written language (i.e., reading and writing) interventions on achievement Method: Databases containing peer- outcomes of school-aged children with reviewed academic studies were searched developmental language disorder (DLD). for randomized and nonrandomized The relatively recent adoption of the controlled trials that reported efficacy and Common Core State Standards by the bulk comparative efficacy findings in English. of the United States and its territories Methodological quality and strength of underscores the importance of this topic evidence were also evaluated. (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2012). The standards were created to Results: Nine reading intervention studies promote quality and consistency in were accepted; no writing intervention education for all students so as to adequately studies were identified that met the inclusion prepare them for college and the workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Assessment
    Identifying, Assessing, and Treating Dyslexia at School Developmental Psychopathology at School Series Editors: Stephen E. Brock, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA Shane R. Jimerson, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Catherine Christo • John M. Davis Stephen E. Brock Identifying, Assessing, and Treating Dyslexia at School Catherine Christo John M. Davis California State University, Sacramento California State University, Department of Special Education, East Bay Rehabilitation School Psychology, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd. & Deaf Studies Hayward CA 94542-3095 6000 J Street USA Sacramento CA 95819-6079 [email protected] USA [email protected] Stephen E. Brock California State University, Sacramento Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation School Psychology, & Deaf Studies 6000 J Street Sacramento CA 95819-6079 USA [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-387-88599-5 e-ISBN: 978-0-387-88600-8 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88600-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008942044 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Implementing the Orton-Gillingham Approach to Reading
    The Effect of Implementing the Orton-Gillingham Approach to Reading on the Decoding Abilities of Struggling Eighth and Tenth Grade Readers by Caroline E. Taylor Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education May 2019 Goucher College Graduate Programs in Education Table of Contents List of Tables i Abstract ii I. Introduction 1 Statement of the Problem 3 Statement of Research Hypothesis 3 Operational Definitions 3 II. Literature Review 5 Dyslexia 5 Multi-Sensory Reading Programs 8 Current Student Performance in Reading and Writing 11 Addressing Reading Disabilities in High School 11 III. Methods 14 Design 14 Participants 14 Instrument 15 Procedure 16 IV. Results 19 V. Discussion 22 References 27 Appendix A 29 List of Tables 1. Hypotheses for testing the sample gains from pre-to-post. 19 2. Descriptive statistics for mean gains. 20 3. t-Test for significance of the sample mean gains. 20 4. Cohen’s Delta effect size for sample mean gains. 20 i Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the Orton-Gillingham approach to reading on eighth and tenth grade decoding abilities. This was a two-group quasi-experimental study that used students who were not randomly selected. Each class contained three students. The study used the results of the Woodcock Johnson Test of Achievement IV: Letter-Word Identification subtest measurement tool. Results of the statistical analysis indicated that the null hypothesis that intervention would have no effect on the students’ reading levels could not be rejected at the customary level of statistical significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyslexia: Quick Fix Or Hard Slog?
    Dyslexia: quick fix or hard slog? Allan Marshall Broomfield School Sabbatical Report Allan Marshall sabbatical report 2008 1 Table of contents Executive Summary 3 Purpose 4 Background 5 Methodology 7 Findings New Zealand Government recognition of dyslexia 8 Alternative programmes available to support dyslexic children 12 Dalwood Assessment Centre and Palm Avenue School, Sydney 16 Implications 19 Conclusions 20 References 21 Allan Marshall sabbatical report 2008 2 Executive Summary Despite a great deal of effort by the MOE, schools, teachers and parents, children who are believed to be dyslexic often show little progress in reading. This is frustrating for teachers, parents and students. Lobby groups such as the Dyslexia Foundation of New Zealand (DFNZ) have worked hard to make the Ministry of Education (MOE) recognise dyslexia as a specific learning disability. The MOE acknowledged that there were still many students who were not achieving and in 2007, it announced that dyslexia was to be formally recognized as a specific learning disability. This was a shift from being non categorical. They now intend to provide specific funding for resources such as web sites, and brochures and resources for parents and teachers. The DFNZ believes that, despite the formal recognition of dyslexia as a learning disability, the MOE’s response has been slow and disappointing. If a child is diagnosed as dyslexic, there is very little clear direction about how to help the child overcome their specific reading problems. Frustrated and anxious parents often turn to expensive commercial programmes that offer ‘quick fixes’ and cures. Unfortunately, no quick fixes are available for dyslexia: dyslexia appears to be ‘for life’ and there is no ‘cure’.
    [Show full text]
  • Coloured Filters for Reading Disability FINAL VERSION2
    UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of coloured filters for reading disability: A systematic review Esther Albon, Yaser Adi & Chris Hyde Department of Public Health and Epidemiology West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Group DPHE 2008, Report Number 67 The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of coloured filters for reading disability: A systematic review A WEST MIDLANDS HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT COLLABORATION REPORT Report commissioned by: Regional Evaluation Panel Produced by: West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration Department of Public Health and Epidemiology The University of Birmingham Authors: Esther Albon, Systematic Reviewer Yaser Adi, Systematic Reviewer Chris Hyde, Director of WMHTAC Correspondence to: Dr Esther Albon Department of Public Health and Epidemiology The University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT Date completed: January 2008 Expiry Date: January 2011 Report Number: 67 ISBN No: 0704426951 9780704426955 © Copyright, West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration Department of Public Health and Epidemiology The University of Birmingham 2008 Coloured filters for reading disability WEST MIDLANDS HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT COLLABORATION (WMHTAC) The West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration (WMHTAC) produce rapid systematic reviews about the effectiveness of healthcare interventions and technologies, in response to requests from West Midlands Health Authorities or the HTA program. Reviews usually take 3-6 months and aim to give a timely and accurate analysis of the quality, strength and direction of the available evidence, generating an economic analysis (where possible a cost-utility analysis) of the intervention. CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS: Esther Albon (re)designed the protocol, identified included studies, undertook data extraction and quality assessment, identified included studies for the cost effectiveness section, and wrote the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Through Color
    Working draft 43 – probably final READING THROUGH COLOUR HOW COLOURED FILTERS CAN REDUCE READING DIFFICULTY, EYE-STRAIN AND HEADACHES ARNOLD WILKINS UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX DEDICATION To the individuals who can benefit from coloured filters, and to my family, Liz, Martha, Jonty, and my parents, Barbara and Leslie and to my secretary, Avril, and collaborator, Liz and you! “But soft, what light though yonder window breaks?” 2 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Professor Wilkins obtained a doctorate from Sussex University for work on human memory. He then spent two years at the Montreal Neurological Institute (1972-1974) where he became interested in epilepsy. He returned to England to work as a research scientist at the Medical Research Council Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, from 1974 until the unit was disbanded in 1997, when he joined the University of Essex. He spent ten years studying the mechanisms of photosensitive epilepsy and techniques for treatment and this study broadened into more general interest in vision and health. He has been responsible for several innovations, including a clinical test of vision; the first controlled trial showing that fluorescent lighting is detrimental to health, and the invention of the first scientifically designed system for ophthalmic tinting, and its introduction into optometric practice. He has a wide range of research interests including the neuropsychology of vision, reading and colour, photosensitive epilepsy, migraine, typography, human memory and attention. These interests have helped him formulate a unified theory of Visual Stress, detailed in a book with this title (Oxford University Press, 1995). He is currently head of the Visual Perception Unit at the University of Essex where he is co-coordinating research on the use of coloured filters in the treatment of reading difficulties and visual stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Into Dyslexia Provision in Wales Literature Review on the State of Research for Children with Dyslexia
    Research into dyslexia provision in Wales Literature review on the state of research for children with dyslexia Research Research document no: 058/2012 Date of issue: 24 August 2012 Research into dyslexia provision in Wales Audience Local authorities and schools. Overview The Welsh Government commissioned a literature review, auditing and benchmarking exercise to respond to the recommendations of the former Enterprise and Learning Committee’s Follow-up report on Support for People with Dyslexia in Wales (2009). This work was conducted by a working group, which comprised of experts in the field of specific learning difficulties (SpLD) in Wales including the Centre for Child Development at Swansea University, the Miles Dyslexia Centre at Bangor University, the Dyscovery Centre at the University of Wales, Newport, the Wrexham NHS Trust and representatives from the National Association of Principal Educational Psychologists (NAPEP) and the Association of Directors of Education in Wales (ADEW). Action None – for information only. required Further Enquiries about this document should be directed to: information Additional Needs Branch Support for Learners Division Department for Education and Skills Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NQ Tel: 029 2082 6044 Fax: 029 2080 1044 e-mail: [email protected] Additional This document can be accessed from the Welsh Government’s copies website at http://wales.gov.uk/topics/educationandskills/publications/ researchandevaluation/research/?lang=en Related Current literacy and dyslexia provision in Wales: A report on the documents benchmarking study (2012) Digital ISBN 978 0 7504 7972 1 © Crown copyright 2012 WG16498 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. CURRENT DEFINITIONS OF DYSLEXIA 4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 468 018 EC 309 152 TITLE Mississippi Dyslexia Handbook: Guidelines and Procedures Concerning Dyslexia and Related Disorders. Revised. INSTITUTION Mississippi State Dept. of Education, Jackson. SPONS AGENCY Department of Education, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 90p.; Revised by the Office of Reading, Early Childhood & Language Arts. CONTRACT ES276A000024 AVAILABLE FROM Office of Reading, Early Childhood & Language Arts, Mississippi State Department of Education, 359 North West Street, P.O. Box 771, Jackson, MS 39205-0771. Tel: 601 -359- 3778; Web site: http://www.mde.k12.ms.us/ACAD/ID/Curriculum/ LAER/index.html. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) Tests/Questionnaires (160) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Accommodations (Disabilities); *Classroom Techniques; Disability Identification; *Dyslexia; Elementary Secondary Education; Inclusive Schools; Intervention; *Multisensory Learning; *Prereferral Intervention; Reading Strategies; State Regulation; Student Characteristics; Study Skills; Symptoms (Individual Disorders); Writing Strategies IDENTIFIERS *Mississippi ABSTRACT This handbook of procedures related to dyslexia is designed to provide guidelines for Mississippi school districts, teachers, and parents in the identification and instruction of students with dyslexia, to assist regular educators in gaining current information concerning dyslexia, accommodations and modifications, and to provide information on instructional programs designed to meet the unique needs of students
    [Show full text]
  • Cogmed Working Memory Training
    PROGRAMME OVERVIEW & IMPLEMENTATION COST/FEES RESEARCH-BASED EVIDENCE *NZD est. based on exchange rate 9/15 Aims to strengthen weak cogniOve capaciOes underlying No published, peer-reviewed evidence available evalua2ng the learning disabili2es through specific cogni2ve exercises. Replaces Annual TuiOon: efficacy of the programme. Anecdotal evidence and unpublished regular school for 3 to 4 years. Students spend 4 periods per day, NZ$15,000 per student Arrowsmith research conducted by Arrowsmith company claims large academic 5 days per week with specially-trained teachers in a 1:10 classroom gains, however, the present scien2fic literature does not provide Program performing computer, auditory, and pen and paper exercises. Training workshop: support for the use of the Arrowsmith programme in the remedia2on Claims a wide range of learning-disabled students will be able to NZ$5,600 + travel to Toronto of learning disabili2es. par2cipate in age-appropriate academic curriculum upon comple2on. IntroducOon to Limited peer-reviewed research support; publica2ons in System of “educaOonal kinesiology” (learning through movement); Brain Gym course: self-funded “Brain Gym Journal” claim gains in cogni2on. Other based on the no2on that learning difficul2es arise from poor NZ$150 peer-reviewed work has labeled Brain Gym as “pseudoscience,” coordina2on between the brain and body. Uses 26 dis2nct exercises due to invalid theoreOcal assumpOons (neurological repa\erning Brain Gym to improve integraOon of specific brain funcOons with body One-on-one training: procedures invalidated, idea that cerebral dominance affects movements. Offered as intensive 2-3 day training courses, 8 sessions: NZ$800 learning repeatedly refuted, and no demonstrated support for typically 8 hours per day.
    [Show full text]