Martes Caurina) Version 2.0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Martes Caurina) Version 2.0 Species Status Assessment for the Coastal Marten (Martes caurina) Version 2.0 July 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 8 Arcata, CA This document was prepared by Jenny Lynn Hutchinson and Sue Livingston with assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s coastal marten Species Status Assessment Team (Beth Forbus, Arnold Roessler, Daniel Russell, Kathleen Brubaker, and Michelle Reilly). We also received assistance from Ray Davis of the U.S. Forest Service, and Matt Gregory and Zhiqiang Yang of Oregon State University in developing the fire and vegetation disturbance and trend tools. Additionally, valuable reviews of a draft of this document were provided by Daniel Applebee, A. Baker, Therese Bradford, Derek Broman, Steven Buskirk, David Clayton, Ray Davis, S. McMillin, Katie Moriarty, B. Munk, Anne Poopatanapong, Kristin Schmidt, Randy Smith, Jake Verschuyl, Jennifer Weikel, and Chris West. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the coastal marten (Martes caurina), Version 2.0. July 2018. Arcata, CA. 2 Species Status Assessment for Coastal Marten (Martes caurina) Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific marten (Martes caurina) in coastal Oregon and northern coastal California, commonly referred to as the coastal marten, and provides a thorough account of the overall viability and extinction risk for the coastal marten. The coastal marten is a mammal in the weasel family and is native to forests of coastal Oregon and coastal California. They occur primarily in older forests, although there is one remnant population occupying the coastal dune forest of central Oregon. To evaluate the biological status of the coastal marten both currently and into the future, we assessed a range of conditions to allow us to consider the species’ resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). Coastal marten needs multiple resilient populations distributed widely across its range to maintain persistence into the future and to avoid extinction. Several factors influence whether coastal marten populations will increase to maximize habitat occupancy, which increases the resiliency of a population to stochastic events. These factors are the connectivity between populations, amount of suitable habitat for establishing home ranges, and amount of habitat that allows for predator avoidance. As we consider the future viability of the species, more populations with high resiliency distributed across the known range of the species are associated with higher overall species viability. Coastal marten historically ranged throughout coastal Oregon and coastal northern California, but has not recently been detected throughout much of the historical range, despite extensive surveys. The species exists in four small populations and is absent from the northern and southern ends of its historical range. We have assessed the coastal marten’s levels of resiliency, redundancy, and representation currently and into the future by ranking the condition of each population. Rankings are a qualitative assessment of the relative condition of occupied habitat based on the knowledge and expertise of Service staff, as well as published reports. Our analysis of the past, current, and future influences on what the coastal marten needs for long term viability revealed that there are two factors that pose the largest risk to future viability of the species. These risks are primarily related to habitat loss and associated changes in quality and distribution: decrease in connectivity between populations, and habitat conversion from that suitable for martens to that suitable for generalist predators and competitors, increasing potential 3 interactions and subsequent marten injury, mortality, or predation; these are all influenced by vegetation management, wildfire, and changing climate. The coastal marten faces a variety of risks from loss of habitat, wildfire, and increased predation risk. These risks play a large role in the resiliency and future viability of the coastal marten. If populations lose resiliency, they are more vulnerable to extirpation, with resulting losses in representation and redundancy. Given the uncertainty regarding connectivity between populations, suitable habitat, and increases in predation within the populations, we have forecasted what the coastal marten may have in terms of resiliency, redundancy, and representation under three plausible future scenarios. While we don’t expect all assumptions to be met in each scenario, these scenarios are meant to give a range of possibilities for the future. To create this range of possibilities we made the following assumptions about stressors to the populations: (1) Scenario One (Continuation): Central Coastal Oregon – Trapping is legal. Loss of older forest continues to follow current trends on Federal and private lands due to wildfire and vegetation management, proposed restoration on the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area moves forward potentially affecting currently occupied suitable habitat. There is no change in connectivity across Highway 101. Southern Coastal Oregon – Trapping is legal. There is a moderate loss of older forest on Federal and private lands due to wildfire and vegetation management. California–Oregon Border – There is little change to older forest on Federal and private lands due to limited impacts of wildfire and vegetation management. Northern Coastal California – There is a moderate loss of older forest on Federal and private lands due to wildfire and vegetation management. (2) Scenario Two (Upper Bound): Central Coastal Oregon – There is a ban on trapping. Connectivity improves to the east through implementation of functional corridors across Highway 101, and there is no increase in the rate of loss of older forest above current trends as described in Scenario One. Proposed dune restoration at the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area does not negatively impact suitable habitat. Southern Coastal Oregon – There is a ban on trapping. There is a 25% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return interval and drought, based on a moderate emissions scenario. The rate of timber harvest does not increase. California–Oregon Border – There is a 25% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return interval and drought, based on a moderate emissions scenario. The rate of timber harvest does not increase. Northern Coastal California – Assisted dispersal is feasible and is implemented to create one additional population and the Habitat Management Guide is implemented. There is a 25% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return 4 interval and drought, based on a moderate emissions scenario. The rate of timber harvest does not increase. (3) Scenario Three (Lower Bound): Central Coastal Oregon – Trapping remains legal. Proposed dune restoration at the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area negatively impacts the amount of suitable habitat. There is a 50% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return interval and drought, based on a high emissions scenario. There is no change in connectivity across Highway 101. Southern Coastal Oregon – Trapping remains legal. There is a 50% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return interval and drought, based on a high emissions scenario. California–Oregon Border – There is a 50% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return interval and drought, based on a high emissions scenario. Northern Coastal California – The assisted dispersal study is not feasible. There is a 25% increase over the rate of older forest lost in Scenario 1 from a shorter fire return interval and drought, based on a moderate emissions scenario. We examined the resiliency, representation, and redundancy of coastal marten under each of these plausible scenarios (Table ES–1). Resiliency of coastal marten populations depends on connectivity, available suitable habitat, and habitat that allows for predator avoidance. We expect the four extant coastal marten populations to experience changes to these aspects of their habitat in different ways under the different scenarios. We projected the coastal marten’s expected future resiliency, representation, and redundancy based on the events that would occur under each scenario (Table ES–2). For these projections, populations in high condition are expected to have high resiliency at that time period; i.e., they occupy habitat of sufficient size and in sufficient numbers to survive stochastic events. Populations in high condition are expected to persist into the future and have the ability to withstand stochastic events that may occur. Populations in moderate condition have less resiliency than those in high condition, but the majority of these populations are expected to persist into the future. Populations in moderation condition are smaller and less dense than those in high condition. Finally, the populations in low condition have low resiliency and are not necessarily able to withstand stochastic events. As a result, they would not be likely to persist in that condition into the future. Under Scenario One (Continuation) – We would expect the coastal marten’s viability
Recommended publications
  • MINNESOTA MUSTELIDS Young
    By Blane Klemek MINNESOTA MUSTELIDS Young Naturalists the Slinky,Stinky Weasel family ave you ever heard anyone call somebody a weasel? If you have, then you might think Hthat being called a weasel is bad. But weasels are good hunters, and they are cunning, curious, strong, and fierce. Weasels and their relatives are mammals. They belong to the order Carnivora (meat eaters) and the family Mustelidae, also known as the weasel family or mustelids. Mustela means weasel in Latin. With 65 species, mustelids are the largest family of carnivores in the world. Eight mustelid species currently make their homes in Minnesota: short-tailed weasel, long-tailed weasel, least weasel, mink, American marten, OTTERS BY DANIEL J. COX fisher, river otter, and American badger. Minnesota Conservation Volunteer May–June 2003 n e MARY CLAY, DEMBINSKY t PHOTO ASSOCIATES r mammals a WEASELS flexible m Here are two TOM AND PAT LEESON specialized mustelid feet. b One is for climb- ou can recognize a ing and the other for hort-tailed weasels (Mustela erminea), long- The long-tailed weasel d most mustelids g digging. Can you tell tailed weasels (M. frenata), and least weasels eats the most varied e food of all weasels. It by their tubelike r which is which? (M. nivalis) live throughout Minnesota. In also lives in the widest Ybodies and their short Stheir northern range, including Minnesota, weasels variety of habitats and legs. Some, such as badgers, hunting. Otters and minks turn white in winter. In autumn, white hairs begin climates across North are heavy and chunky. Some, are excellent swimmers that hunt to replace their brown summer coat.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for the Humboldt Marten (Martes Americana Humboldtensis)
    Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Species Assessment for the Humboldt Marten (Martes americana humboldtensis) R. Hamlin, L. Roberts, G. Schmidt, K. Brubaker and R. Bosch Photo credit: Six Rivers National Forest Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, California 95521 (707) 822-7201 www.fws.gov/arcata September 2010 i The suggested citation for this report is: Hamlin, R., L. Roberts, G. Schmidt, K. Brubaker and R. Bosch 2010. Species assessment for the Humboldt marten (Martes americana humboldtensis). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, California. 34 + iv pp. ii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 1 Species Description ................................................................................................... 1 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................. 1 Life History ............................................................................................................... 4 Reproduction .................................................................................................. 5 Diet ................................................................................................................ 5 Home Range
    [Show full text]
  • American Marten (Martes Americana) Species Assessment Prepared For
    American Marten (Martes Americana) Species Assessment Prepared for the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forest September 2005 Prepared by Matt Vasquez1 with contributions by Leslie Spicer1, 2005 1 Biological Science Technician (Wildlife), Gunnison Ranger District Reviewed and Edited by Clay Speas, Forest Fisheries Biologist and Tom Holland, Forest Wildlife Biologist Cover photos taken by remote cameras at track plate and bait stations on the Gunnison Ranger District, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forest. Last Revised: September 28, 2005 Page 1 of 23 Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forest American Marten (Martes Americana) Species Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 5 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS .............................................................................................................. 5 HABITAT CRITERIA USED IN FOREST-WIDE HABITAT EVALUATION ................................... 6 2001 MIS Habitat Criteria...................................................................................................................... 6 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2005 MIS Habitat Criteria...................................................................................................................... 6 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx and Wolverine in the Western United States
    United States The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores Department of Agriculture Forest Service American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, Rocky Mountain and Wolverine Forest and Range Experiment Station in the Western United States Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 General Technical Report RM-254 Abstract Ruggiero, Leonard F.; Aubry, Keith B.; Buskirk, Steven W.; Lyon, L. Jack; Zielinski, William J., tech. eds. 1994. The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx and Wolverine in the Western United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-254. Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 184 p. This cooperative effort by USDA Forest Service Research and the National Forest System assesses the state of knowledge related to the conservation status of four forest carnivores in the western United States: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine. The conservation assessment reviews the biology and ecology of these species. It also discusses management considerations stemming from what is known and identifies information needed. Overall, we found huge knowledge gaps that make it difficult to evaluate the species’ conservation status. In the western United States, the forest carnivores in this assessment are limited to boreal forest ecosystems. These forests are characterized by extensive landscapes with a component of structurally complex, mesic coniferous stands that are characteristic of late stages of forest development. The center of the distrbution of this forest type, and of forest carnivores, is the vast boreal forest of Canada and Alaska. In the western conterminous 48 states, the distribution of boreal forest is less continuous and more isolated so that forest carnivores and their habitats are more fragmented at the southern limits of their ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes Necator): a Conservation Assessment
    Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes necator): A Conservation Assessment John D. Perrine * Environmental Science, Policy and Management Department and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology University of California, Berkeley Lori A. Campbell** USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Sierra Nevada Research Center Davis, California Gregory A. Green Tetra Tech EC Bothell, Washington Current address and contact information: *Primary Author: J. Perrine, Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0401 [email protected] **L. Campbell, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 Perrine, Campbell and Green R5-FR-010 August 2010 NOTES IN PROOF • Genetic analyses by B. Sacks and others 2010 (Conservation Genetics 11:1523-1539) indicate that the Sacramento Valley red fox population is native to California and is closely related to the Sierra Nevada red fox. They designated the Sacramento Valley red fox as a new subspecies, V. v. patwin. • In August 2010, as this document was going to press, biologists on the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest detected a red fox at an automatic camera station near the Sonora Pass along the border of Tuolomne and Mono Counties. Preliminary genetic analyses conducted at UC Davis indicate that the fox was a Sierra Nevada red fox. Further surveys and analyses are planned. • The California Department of Fish and Game Region 1 Timber Harvest Program has established a Sierra Nevada red fox information portal, where many management-relevant documents can be downloaded as PDFs. See: https://r1.dfg.ca.gov/Portal/SierraNevadaRedFox/tabid/618/Default.aspx Sierra Nevada Red Fox Conservation Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This conservation assessment provides a science-based, comprehensive assessment of the status of the Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) and its habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, and Wolverine: Survey Methods for Their Detection Agriculture
    United States Department of American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, and Wolverine: Survey Methods for Their Detection Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Abstract Zielinski, William J.; Kucera, Thomas E., technical editors. 1995. American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: survey methods for their detection. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-157. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 163 p. The status of the American marten (Martes americana), fisher (Martes pennanti), lynx (Lynx canadensis), and wolverine (Gulo gulo) is of increasing concern to managers and conservationists in much of the western United States. Because these species are protected throughout much of their range in the west, information on population status and trends is unavailable from trapping records. This report describes methods to detect the four species using either remote photography, track plates, or snow tracking. A strategy for systematic sampling and advice on the number of devices used, their deployment, and the minimum sampling duration for each sampling unit are provided. A method for the disposition of survey data is recommended such that the collective results of multiple surveys can describe regional distribution patterns over time. The report describes survey methods for detection only but also provides some considerations for their use to monitor population change. Retrieval Terms: furbearers, forest carnivores, survey methods, monitoring, inventory, western United States Technical Editors William J. Zielinski is research wildlife biologist with the Station's TimberlWildlife Research Unit, Redwood Sciences Laboratory, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, CA 95521; and an Associate Faculty, Wildlife Department, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521. Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • American Marten, Fisher
    Chapter 3 Fisher Roger A. Powell, Department of Zoology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina William J. Zielinski, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Arcata, California INTRODUCTION guard hairs are noticeably shorter than during the rest of the year, giving fishers a sleek appearance. Natural History Fishers have five toes on all four feet. Their claws are retractable but not sheathed. Fishers are planti- The fisher (Martes pennanti) is a medium-size mam- grade and their feet are large. There are pads on each malian carnivore and the largest member of the ge- toe and four central pads, one each behind digits 1, 2 nus Martes (Anderson 1970) of the family Mustelidae and 3, 4, and 5, on each foot. From the central pads in the order Carnivora. The genus Martes includes to the heels of the hindpaws, there are coarse hairs five or six other extant species. The fisher has the covering tough skin. The small, circular patches of general body build of a stocky weasel and is long, coarse hair on the central pads of the hindpaws are thin, and set low to the ground. A fisher's head is associated with plantar glands and carry an odor triangular with a pronounced muzzle, its ears are distinctly different from other fisher odors (Buskirk large but rounded, and its eyes face largely forward at al. 1986; Powell 1977, 1981a, 1993). Because these (Douglas and Strickland 1987). Adult male fishers patches enlarge on both males and females during generally weigh between 3.5 and 5.5 kg and are be- the breeding season (Frost and Krohn, unpubl.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of American Black Bear Occurrences and Human–Bear Incidents in Missouri
    Distribution of American black bear occurrences and human–bear incidents in Missouri Clay M. Wilton1,3, Jerrold L. Belant1,4, and Jeff Beringer2 1Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA 2Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd., Columbia, MO 65202, USA Abstract: American black bears (Ursus americanus) were nearly extirpated from Missouri (USA) by the early 1900s and began re-colonizing apparent suitable habitat in southern Missouri following reintroduction efforts in Arkansas (USA) during the 1960s. We used anecdotal occurrence data from 1989 to 2010 and forest cover to describe broad patterns of black bear re-colonization, human–bear incidents, and bear mortality reports in Missouri. Overall, 1,114 black bear occurrences (including 118 with dependent young) were reported, with 95% occurring within the Ozark Highlands ecological region. We created evidentiary standards to increase reliability of reports, resulting in exclusion of 21% of all occurrences and 13% of dependent young. Human–bear incidents comprised 5% of total occurrences, with 86% involving bears eating anthropogenic foods. We found support for a northward trend in latitudinal extent of total occurrences over time, but not for reported incidents. We found a positive correlation between the distribution of bear occurrences and incidents. Twenty bear mortalities were reported, with 60% caused by vehicle collisions. Black bear occurrences have been reported throughout most of Missouri’s forested areas, although most reports of reproduction occur in the southern and eastern Ozark Highlands. Though occurrence data are often suspect, the distribution of reliable reports supports our understanding of black bear ecology in Missouri and reveals basic, but important, large-scale patterns important for establishing management and research plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Express Newsletter
    Volume 24/Issue 5 American Marten January 2011 American Marten AHO ID F I E S H M & GA et’s Talk About . The American Marten LThere is a word that describes the American when born, but they grow quickly drinking their marten well – cute! They look a bit like a small, mother’s milk. For the first six weeks of their lives, slender house cat with a long, bushy tail. the kits are nursed by their mother. When the kits American martens are 18 to 26 inches long and are six to seven weeks old, the mother will start weigh only one to three pounds. Their face is to wean them and bring them meat to eat. By the pointed with big round ears. American martens time the kits are three months old, they are nearly have beautiful fur. It is brown to black in color and full grown and able to live on their own. silky soft. On their throats, they have a splash of Next time you are in an Idaho forest, don’t forget color. This fur is a creamy white to orange color. to look up. You may be lucky enough to see a You may hear people call American martens, curious American marten looking back at you. You pine martens; they live in dense forests. American may even see it leaping and jumping from tree to martens are excellent tree climbers. They have tree! semi-retractable claws similar to a cat. With their claws and long tail for balance, American martens can zip up a tree and leap between trees quickly and easily.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance, Prey Availability and Diets of American Martens: Implications for the Design of Old-Growth Reserves in Southeast Alaska
    Wildlife Research Final Report ABUNDANCE, PREY AVAILABILITY AND DIETS OF AMERICAN MARTENS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF OLD-GROWTH RESERVES IN SOUTHEAST ALASKA Rodney W. Flynn, Thomas V. Schumacher, Merav Ben-David This project was primarily funded by THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Juneau Field Office, Juneau, Alaska and THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME. Division of Wildlife, Douglas, Alaska ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Kim Hastings, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, assisted in arranging the grant, provided peer review of the study plan, and made many useful comments on the manuscript. Joe McClung captained the FWS boat at Point Couverden. Staff of the Tongass National Forest, U.S. Forest Service, assisted with many aspects of the project. Glenn Ith and Jim Brainerd arranged for facilities and vehicles on the Petersburg District. On the Thorne Bay District, Susan Howell and Ray Slayton assisted with logistics and the fieldwork. Dennis Chester assisted with the trapping at Point Couverden. Steve Lewis, Richard Lowell, Paul Converse, Chad Rice, and Mary Mecci from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, provided field or administrative support. Kimberly Titus provided supervision and project review. Grey Pendleton developed the population estimator and provided statistical review. Becky Strauch computed the variance for the study area estimates. Cathy Brown edited the report. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, natural origin, age, sex, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at [voice] 907-465­ 4120, telecommunications device for the deaf [TDD] 1-800-478-3648, or fax 907-465-6078.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Wildlife
    Science Synthesis to Support Socioecological Resilience in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Range Section 7—Terrestrial Wildlife wide range of terrestrial wildlife species inhabit the synthesis area. This sec- A tion of the report focuses on three of those species: two forest carnivores, the fisher Pekania( pennanti) and the Pacific marten Martes( caurina), and one raptor, the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis). Recent taxonomic revi- sions have changed the scientific names of the fisher and marten in California. The fisher was formerly known as M. pennanti (Sato et al. 2012), and the Pacific marten, found in western North America, was formerly classified with the American marten (M. americana), which now refers to martens in eastern North America (Dawson and Cook 2012). Chapter 7.1, “The Forest Carnivores: Marten and Fisher,” describes the ecology and context of fisher and marten, summarizing population trends, iden- tifying threats, and highlighting science-based implications for the management of their habitats. Chapter 7.2, “California Spotted Owl: Scientific Considerations for Forest Planning,” describes the ecological context, population trends, and habitat needs of this top predator, highlighting recent findings on the effects of forest management, wildfire, and other important ecological stressors. Several aquatic species of concern to management, including native trouts and amphibians, are addressed in chapters 6.1 “Water and Stream Ecosystems,” and 6.4, “Lakes: Recent Research and Restoration Strategies.” Munton Tom The species in this section are not the only ones that could be affected by management actions, but they have been priorities for conservation in the synthesis area because of ecological and social factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Carnivore Research in the Northern Cascades of Oregon (Oct 2012–May 2013, Oct 2013–Jun 2014)
    Final Progress Report Forest Carnivore Research in the Northern Cascades of Oregon (Oct 2012–May 2013, Oct 2013–Jun 2014) 2 July 2014 Jamie E. McFadden-Hiller1,2, Oregon Wildlife, 1122 NE 122nd, Suite 1148, Portland, OR 97230, USA Tim L. Hiller1,3, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Division, 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE, Salem, OR 97302, USA One of several red foxes detected in the northern Cascades of Oregon. Suggested citation: McFadden-Hiller, J. E., and T. L. Hiller. 2014. Forest carnivore research in the northern Cascades of Oregon, final progress report (Oct 2012–May 2013, Oct 2013–Jun 2014). Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, Oregon, USA. 1 Current address: Mississippi State University, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762-9690, USA 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] Oregon Cascades Forest Carnivore Research, Final Progress Report, Jun 2014 2 Habitat for American marten (Martes americana)4 typically includes late successional coniferous and mixed forests with >30% canopy cover (see Clark et al. 1987, Strickland and Douglas 1987). The Pacific Northwest has experienced intensive logging during the past century and the distribution of martens in this region is largely discontinuous because of fragmented patches of forest cover (Gibilisco 1994). Based on state agency harvest data, the average annual number of martens harvested in the Oregon Cascades (and statewide) has decreased substantially during recent decades, but disentangling the potential factors (e.g., decreasing abundance, decreasing harvest effort) attributed to changes in harvest levels continues to prove difficult (Hiller 2011, Hiller et al.
    [Show full text]