Montana Kaimin, September 1, 2006 Students of the Niu Versity of Montana, Missoula

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Montana Kaimin, September 1, 2006 Students of the Niu Versity of Montana, Missoula University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 9-1-2006 Montana Kaimin, September 1, 2006 Students of The niU versity of Montana, Missoula Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Students of The nivU ersity of Montana, Missoula, "Montana Kaimin, September 1, 2006" (2006). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 4914. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/4914 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ¤ Sports Kaimin Back Football frenzy MONTANA to school tip No. 2 Page 14 Page 11 Friday, September 1, 2006 AIMIN Volume CIX, Issue 4 ComeKdic Concert Wage increase initiative sparks strongTY HAMPTON debate MONTANA KAIMIN Montana’s stagnant minimum wage rate of $5.15 per hour, the feder- al minimum, might increase by $1 after nine years without change if voters pass Initiative-151 in November’s general election. The proposal put forth on the ballot by the Raise Montana campaign includes built-in annual adjustments to match cost-of-living increases. And it appears popular, if three public polls that showed between 74 percent to 80 percent of Montanans favor of the proposal are any indi- cation. “This shows Montanans believe it to be a reasonable rate — maybe not enough — but reasonable,” Raise Montana Campaign Manager Doug Mitchell said. A minimum wage increase proposal hasn’t appeared on the Montana ballot since 1996, when a proposal to raise it from $4.25 to $6.25 by 2000 was defeated 56 percent to 44 percent. Federal law required the raise to $5.15 in 1997. Three hundred volunteers and a dozen paid signature gatherers col- lected more than 30,000 signatures of those in favor of the initiative in 67 of Montana’s 100 legislative districts and 54 of the state’s 56 coun- ties. Interestingly, the number of signatures equals the state Labor Department’s estimate of how many Montana workers receive mini- mum wage – 30,000. Shane McMillan / Montana Kaimin According to Mitchell, the average minimum wage worker is 26 The Oval was converted into a comedy corner Thursday night as comedian-musicians Mike Hardwick and Chris Phirman entertained the crowd years old. Many dismiss the issue as unnecessary because “it’s just high for about an hour. The goal was to “get people out of the halls and meeting each other,” said associate director of the UC Lee Clark. school or college students who are going to run out to buy the newest CD,” Mitchell said, but he disagrees with that view. “It’s really a movement to decide what is fair and, student or other- wise, working full time to only make 69 percent of the federal poverty level isn’t fair,” Mitchell said. Aaron Brock, outreach coordinator at the Missoula Food Bank, Student escapes gunpoint asault agrees with Mitchell, calling the current wage conditions a social and economic injustice with an unfortunate consequence – Montanans ZACHARY FRANZ See MINIMUM WAGE, Page 6 MONTANA KAIMIN wallet, but he threw it down and then attempted to sexually assault her. The woman was able to escape and call police, the A student reported to police that she was robbed at report says. The man fled before officers arrived on $$ttuuddeenntt gunpoint just off campus Tuesday night, said Sgt. the scene. The woman was taken to First Step, the Scott Hoffman with the Missoula Police Department. division of St. Patrick Hospital that specializes in The woman, a 21-year-old student, was walking cases of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault, from the University Center to her home in the Hoffman said. University Village Apartments on South Avenue The woman said the man who attacked her was ¢¢aasshh around 11:30 p.m., according to the police report. black, between 5’10” and 6’0” tall, with a medium Just off campus, a man approached her, held a gun build. He was wearing a black, hooded sweatshirt to her head and demanded money, the report says. and had the hood pulled up, she said. The woman told police that she gave the man her Student pay goes from Segway to parking-ticket future monthly to biweekly ZACHARY FRANZ & SHANE MCMILLAN TY HAMPTON MONTANA KAIMIN MONTANA KAIMIN Starting this semester, all students with on-campus student jobs pay- The University of Montana’s new Segway Human ing hourly wages will be paid biweekly instead of monthly, as in the Transporter looks pretty cool, but students may not be quick past. to embrace it. After all, its major contribution so far has Student workers who use direct deposit will be paid on the 1st and been to allow Campus Safety Parking Officer Audrey 15th of every month beginning Sept. 15. Those who don’t use direct Kramer-Jorgenson to find more illegally parked cars. deposit can pick up their checks the following business day. “I can write more tickets faster because I can move According to Terri Phillips, associate director of Human Resource faster,” she said. Services, students have been requesting a more frequent pay schedule Kramer-Jorgenson is the primary user of the University’s for years now. But the old computer network couldn’t handle managing Segway – a gyroscope-balanced, scooter-like vehicle. UM payroll every two weeks along with other duties. purchased the Segway over the summer. It’s an older Now, due to a more powerful computer network drive installed this model, said Office of Public Safety Director Ken Willett, summer, biweekly pay is possible. and cost about $4,300. Mark LoParco, director of Dining Services, said his department and The school plans to purchase another Segway for police many others around campus have been supporters of the change for at use in the next few weeks, Willett said. The new unit will be least the past decade. a more advanced model and will have some off-road capa- “It’s very important to us because we rely on a student work force bility, he said. He expects it to cost UM about $6,500. with approximately 450 student workers,” LoParco said. Several factors justify that cost, Willett said. A Segway At times, hiring and retaining employees at places like the Food Zoo can go longer than an officer on foot, is easier to use in a was made difficult in the old system, LoParco said. One reason is that crowd than a block and can get places that a car can’t, Willet employees who started in mid-August would not be paid until Oct. 1. said. In the new system, the same employees will see a check two weeks The Segway also plays a public relations role, as people earlier, by Sept. 15. It will make it easier to hire new employees midse- are always curious and want to ask about it, he said. mester and fill the turnover gap when November hits and some student Furthermore, the Segway runs on electricity, saving expen- workers decide to focus more on their studies, LoParco said. sive gas. “If you subscribe to the ‘students first’ motto, you have to see this as The vehicles have the same weather limitations as a bike, positive action in that respect,” LoParco said. Willett said. They aren’t practical in rain or extreme cold. Shane McMillan / Montana Kaimin Food Zoo employee Kendrie Willhite, a junior, has been waiting a “I really think they are going to catch on,” Kramer- Campus Safety Parking Officer Audrey Kramer-Jorgenson explains year and a half for the change to take place. Jorgensen said. the operation of the Segway she often uses while ticketing illegally “It just makes it easier to manage your finances, and I think it’s a parked vehicles on campus. See STUDENT PAY, Page 6 www.montanakaimin.com M o n t a n a K a i m i n 2 Opinion Friday, September 1, 2006 d the Guest Column n O u ... al v Students have biggest stake in elections o O v e h r t a d n u A o l r A . When I was a novice political candidate a few For me, this isn’t a partisan issue. It is an issue . A l r years ago, trying to put together a political campaign about whether the form of government I love is a o v u strategy that would overcome the experience and going to have any relevancy or whether it is going to O n e d h t notoriety of my opponent, I was advised over and be given over to the well-heeled, the connected and over again, “Don’t waste time campaigning with uni- the powerful. When given the right to vote and par- versity students — they don’t vote and they don’t ticipate in government, will students embrace care.” democracy as a personal duty or return it with a Question 1: What was your greatest moment of the I couldn’t believe it. Students not care? Students blank stare of indifference? Will they plead they are summer? have the biggest stake in the outcome of any election. unaware of how to register to vote? Too ignorant of Question 2: Was it a summer of romance? Their future is on the line.
Recommended publications
  • Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty
    California District Attorneys Association Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty Produced in collaboration with the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation MARCH 2003 GILBERT G. OTERO LAWRENCE G. BROWN President Executive Director Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty MARCH 2003 CDAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS DIRECTORS PRESIDENT John Paul Bernardi, Los Angeles County Gilbert G. Otero Imperial County Cregor G. Datig, Riverside County SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Bradford Fenocchio, Placer County David W. Paulson Solano County James P. Fox, San Mateo County SECRETARY-TREASURER Ed Jagels, Kern County Jan Scully Sacramento County Ernest J. LiCalsi, Madera County SERGEANT-AT-ARMS Martin T. Murray, San Mateo County Gerald Shea San Luis Obispo County Rolanda Pierre Dixon, Santa Clara County PAST PRESIDENT Frank J. Vanella, San Bernardino County Gordon Spencer Merced County Terry Wiley, Alameda County Acknowledgments The research and preparation of this document required the effort, skill, and collaboration of some of California’s most experienced capital-case prosecutors and talented administration- of-justice attorneys. Deep gratitude is extended to all who assisted. Special recognition is also deserved by CDAA’s Projects Editor, Kaye Bassett, Esq. This paper would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of the California District Attorneys Association’s Death Penalty White Paper Ad Hoc Committee. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION DEATH PENALTY WHITE PAPER AD HOC COMMITTEE JIM ANDERSON ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TAMI R. BOGERT CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION SUSAN BLAKE CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION LAWRENCE G. BROWN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION WARD A. CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE BRENDA DALY SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE DANE GILLETTE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE DAVID R.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Session Committee On
    MINUTES MONTANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 54th LEGISLATURE -- REGULAR SESSION COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Call to Order: By CHAIRMAN BOB CLARK, on January 18, 1995, at 8:05 AM. ROLL CALL Members Present: Rep. Robert C. Clark, Chairman (R) Rep. Shiell Anderson, Vice Chairman (Majority) (R) Rep. Diana E. Wyatt, Vice Chairman (Minority) (D) Rep. Chris Ahner (R) Rep. Ellen Bergman (R) Rep. William Boharski Rep. Bill Carey (D) Rep. Aubyn A. Curtiss (R) Rep. Duane Grimes (R) Rep. Joan Hurdle (D) Rep. Deb Kottel (D) Rep. Linda McCulloch (D) Rep. Daniel W. McGee (R) Rep. Brad Molnar (R) Rep. Debbie Shea (D) Rep. Liz Smith (R) Rep. Loren L. Soft (R) Rep. Bill Tash (R) Rep. Cliff Trexler (R) Members Excused: None Members Absent: None Staff Present: John MacMaster, Legislative Council Joanne Gunderson, Committee Secretary Please Note: These are summary minutes. Testimony and discussion are paraphrased and condensed. Committee Business Summary: Hearing: HB 69, HB 135 Executive Action: NONE 950118JU.HM1 HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE January 18, 1995 Page 2 of 15 {Tape: ~i Side: A} HEARING ON HB 69 Opening Statement by Sponsor: REP. MARJORIE FISHER, HD 80, introduced HB 69 which includes in its intent the notification of victims of crime of an. escape or release of an offender; and if it doesn't jeopardize a pending investigation, it deals with the release of information about the case. It is also intends to cover restitution to a victim as well as to provi~e protection from future harm. Proponents' Testimony: Joe Mazurek, Attorney General, said that while there is agreement that crime victims should be an integral part of the criminal justice system, they are often overlooked in the technicalities and procedures of the criminal process.
    [Show full text]
  • State V. Smith (1985)
    Nos. 95-477 and 95-494 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Respondent, --v. RONALD ALLEN SMITH, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, In and for the County of Flathead, The Honorable John W. Larson, Judge presiding. COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Gregory A. Jackson, Jackson & Rice, Helena, Montana Donald Vernay, Big Fork, Montana For Respondent: Hon. Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General; Elizabeth Griffing, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana Thomas Esch, County Attorney, Kalispell, Montana Heard: October 29, 1996 Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: December 1,13, 1996 Filed: ,,..I_ Chief Justice J. A. Turnage delivered the Opinion of the Court. Ronald Allen Smith appeals from the September 19, 1995 judgment of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, ordering that he be executed according to the laws of the State of Montana. His appeal is here consolidated with this Court's automatic review of a death penalty case. We affirm. The issues are: 1. Is the sentence imposed the result of vindictive prosecu- tion by the State of Montana? 2. Is Montana's death penalty statutory scheme unconstitu- tional in its allocation of the burdens of proof of aggravating and mitigating circumstances? 3. Are the court's findings of the existence or nonexistence of aggravating and mitigating circumstances supported by the evidence? 4. Did the court erroneously rely upon the reports and testimony of Dr. Stratford in reaching its decision, and, if it did so rely, did such reliance violate Smith's right against self- incrimination, right to counsel, and right to due process? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Criminal Defense Lawyers Association V. State of Montana
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2 No. OP 06-0492 3 MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LA WYERS; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES 4 UNION OF MONTANA; MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES; MONTANA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE; 5 GORDON BENNETT; JOHN C. SHEEHY; SENATORS BRENT CROMLEY, STEVE GALLUS, DAN HARRINGTON, 6 DON RYAN AND DAN WEINBERG; REPRESENTATIVES NORMA BIXBY, PAUL CLARK, GAIL GUTSCHE, JOEY 7 JA YNE, AND JEANNE WINDHAM; MARIETTA JAEGER CLERK OF THF SUPREME COURT LANE; EVE MALO, 81ATE or MONTANA 8 Peti ti oners, 9 v. 10 STATE OF MONTANA- DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; I I DIRECTOR MIKE FERRITER; WARDEN MIKE MAHONEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE McGRATH; JOHN DOES 1-10, 12 Defendant and Appellant. 13 14 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 15 16 Without presenting any evidence of any past or present problem related 17 to Montana's lethal injection procedure, and only thirty days prior to his 18 scheduled execution on August II, 2006, Petitioners ask this Court to invoke 19 its original jurisdiction to stay the execution of David Thomas Dawson 20 (Dawson) on the ground that Montana's lethal injection procedure may pose a 21 risk of error that may violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel 22 and unusual punishment. Noticeably absent from the long list of Petitioners is 23 David Dawson. In fact, Dawson has specifically informed this Court that he 24 does not desire to participate in this lawsuit, and that he desires that his 25 execution proceed as scheduled. Also absent are the other inmates subject 26 to a death penalty in Montana: William Gollehon, Ronald Smith, and 27 RESPO",SE TO PETITIO", FOR I'iJL'iCTIVE RELIEF P·\(;E I Daniel Johnson.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for Injunctive Relief
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. _______ MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MONTANA; MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES; MONTANA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE; GORDON BENNETT; JOHN C. SHEEHY; SENATORS BRENT CROMLEY, STEVE GALLUS, DAN HARRINGTON, DON RYAN AND DAN WEINBERG; REPRESENTATIVES NORMA BIXBY, PAUL CLARK, GAIL GUTSCHE, JOEY JAYNE, AND JEANNE WINDHAM; MARIETTA JAEGER LANE; EVE MALO, Petitioners, v. STATE OF MONTANA; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DIRECTOR MIKE FERRITER; WARDEN MIKE MAHONEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE MCGRATH, JOHN DOES 1-10, Respondents. VEH1FIED PETITI01~ FOR n~JlJi'·~CTIVE RELIEF "AJ~D MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED) Ronald F. Waterman, Esq. Julie A. Johnson, Esq. GOUGH, SHANAHAN, JOHNSON & WATERMAN P.O. Box 1715 Helena, MT 59624 406/442-8560 1. VERIFIED PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF COME NOW Petitioners pursuant to § 3-2-205(2), MCA, and Rule 17, M.R.App.P., and request a temporary restraining order and preliminalY and permanent injunctions barring the administration of all executions by lethal injection in the State of Montana. Petitioners also request this Court to remand the matter to the Montana First Judicial District 1 for an evidentiary hearing on Montana's lethal injection protocol with the instruction that the district court shall permit limited discovery to allow the parties and the district court to fully investigate and review the protocol and thus alTive at a reasoned determination of its constitutionality or lack thereof. Finally, Petitioners request oral argument before this Court pursuant to Rule l7(f), M.R.App.P. II. INVOCATION OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION An action for iniunctive relief can be commenced in this Court if the State is J a party, the public is interested, or the rights of the public are involved.
    [Show full text]