An Exploratory Study of Preschool Teachers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF PRESCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERCEIVED KNOWLEDGE, BEHAVIORS AND ATTITUDES/BELIEFS REGARDING THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM) PROCESS STANDARDS A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Julia A. Stoll May 2015 © Copyright, 2015 by Julia A. Stoll All Rights Reserved ii A dissertation written by Julia A. Stoll B.S., Bowling Green State University, 1993 M.A., Kent State University, 2000 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2015 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Anne Reynolds _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Karl W. Kosko _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Karen L. Kritzer Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Alexa L. Sandmann Studies _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human Services Daniel F. Mahony iii STOLL, JULIA A., Ph.D., May 2015 Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Studies AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF PRESCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERCEIVED KNOWLEDGE, BEHAVIORS AND ATTITUDES/BELIEFS REGARDING THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM) PROCESS STANDARDS (249 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Anne Reynolds, Ph.D. The purpose of this study was to find out what preschool teachers know about the NCTM Process Standards. A 56 item survey instrument was designed to assess, a) teachers’ perceived content and pedagogical content knowledge, b) teachers’ reported behaviors, and c) teachers’ attitudes and beliefs, all regarding the value and importance of the mathematics processes in preschool settings. The recommendation in the literature is that quality mathematics instruction is important in preschool and should include a focus on these processes. There were 217 preschool teachers in the state of Ohio that completed the online survey. Data analysis revealed areas where teachers would benefit from more professional development opportunities. Teachers have some knowledge of the mathematics processes but not a strong knowledge base. They had the most knowledge of mathematical connections and least knowledge of problem solving. A look at reported behaviors revealed that teachers promote representation of mathematical ideas the least, and for attitudes/beliefs teachers are least confident with reasoning & proof and representation. There was a meaningfully significant correlation between teachers’ reported behaviors and attitudes/beliefs. Further analyses indicated that teachers with a state teaching license had more knowledge of the processes, particularly for reasoning & proof and representation. Also, work setting did have an affect on teacher behaviors with significant differences found between teachers who work in Head Start programs and teachers in public school settings, with Head Start teachers reporting more frequent behaviors that promote the mathematics processes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my family, friends, professors, and especially the wonderful people on my dissertation committee. With the extra few years it took me to complete this work I can’t thank my dissertation committee director, Anne Reynolds, Ph.D., enough for hanging in there with me. Also, on my committee I want to thank Karen Kritzer, Ph.D. and Karl Kosko, Ph.D. for their time, feedback, and words of encouragement. Thank you Dr. Kosko for the personal knowledge and resources that helped in my analysis of the survey data. I thank my parents for ongoing “check-ins” and for the many times they took care of my darling, four-year old son, Finley, so I had time to write and my sister Marcia for the statistics talks that were ever so helpful in my understanding of the data. Also, I never would have completed this work without the entire Hutchins family: Pam, Tom, Emily, Eva, and Trey. Since Finley was born they have graciously provided him a home away from home where he feels like one of their family. I wish to thank Debbie Shama-Davis, Ph.D. from the KSU Research & Evaluation Bureau for the initial input provided in the design of my survey instrument. Also, I would like to thank Eddie Bolden, evaluator for the bureau, who provided an abundance of support with the SPSS program analyses and reports. Who I was as both a teacher and a learner was transformed during my master’s program at KSU where I had the opportunity to engage in critical conversations with my professors, Carol Bersani, Genevieve Davis, Nancy Barbour, Beverly Timmons, Rich iv Ambrose. Thank you to all of them, especially Genevieve Davis, for inspiring me to continue my graduate work. Last but certainly not least, I want to thank all of my colleagues at the KSU Child Development Center. I would have never finished the program without their support, encouragement, and help in many ways from offering feedback on the survey to numerous cheers of “You can do it!” They are my family and have supported me as any family would by going above and beyond what anyone would have expected. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. x CHAPTER Page I INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................1 Significance of the Study ..........................................................................................11 Research Goals and Objectives .................................................................................15 II LITERATURE REVIEW .........................................................................................18 Introduction ...............................................................................................................18 Reform Mathematics Curriculum .............................................................................20 Mathematics Education: An Historical Lens ...................................................20 Learning with Understanding ..........................................................................23 NCTM Mathematics Process Standards Defined ............................................26 Problem solving ......................................................................................26 Reasoning and proof ...............................................................................28 Communication .......................................................................................30 Connections.............................................................................................31 Representation.........................................................................................33 The State of Mathematics in Early Education ..........................................................34 Children’s Informal and Formal Mathematics Knowledge .............................40 The Vital Role of the Preschool Teacher .........................................................44 Measures of Mathematics Instruction in Early Education ...............................47 Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Education .............................53 Teacher Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes/Beliefs ...................................56 Teacher Knowledge Defined ..................................................................57 Teacher Attitudes and Beliefs Defined ...................................................61 Relationships Between Teacher Knowledge, Attitudes/Beliefs and Behaviors................................................................................................62 Conclusion ................................................................................................................65 III METHOD AND PROCEDURES .............................................................................67 Introduction ...............................................................................................................67 Research Objectives ........................................................................................67 Research Questions ..........................................................................................68 vi Research Design........................................................................................................71 Dependent Variables ........................................................................................71 Independent Variables .....................................................................................72 Population and Sampling Plan .........................................................................73 Validity and Reliability ....................................................................................74 Face validity and content validity ..........................................................75 Reliability ................................................................................................76 Development of the Instrument: Teaching Mathematics Processes in Preschool Survey (TMPPS) ...................................................................................76 Survey Design .........................................................................................79