DOCSLIB.ORG

Special-Status Plant Survey Report Special-Status Plant Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Special-Status Plant Survey Report Special-Status Plant Survey Report For the Hidden Creeks Project Site, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California Prepared for: First American Communities 370 N. Westlake Boulevard, #130 Thousand Oaks, California 91362 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 803 Camarillo Springs Road, Suite A Camarillo, California 93012 (805) 437-1900 June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................................2 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Project Description................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Purpose...................................................................................................................................................2 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING......................................................................................................................2 3.1 General Site Characteristics .................................................................................................................2 3.2 Plant Communities................................................................................................................................3 4.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................................13 4.1 Database Search...................................................................................................................................13 4.2 Presence/Absence Special-Status Plant Surveys .............................................................................13 5.0 RESULTS.........................................................................................................................................................14 5.1 Database Search Results for Special-Status Plant Species..............................................................14 5.2 Presence/Absence Plant Survey Results...........................................................................................14 6.0 CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................................................14 7.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................................15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Regional Context Map .................................................................................................................................4 2 Location Dominant Plant Communities on the Hidden Creeks Estates Project Site and Impact Area...................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Special-Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur on the Hidden Creeks Project Site Based on CNDDB and CNPS Database Search Results......................................................................................6 2 Plant Species Observed on theHidden Creeks Project Site....................................................................7 Impact Sciences, Inc. i Hidden Creeks Project Site 860-001 June 2006 Special-Status Plant Survey Report 1.0 SUMMARY Focused surveys for special-status plant species were conducted on the Hidden Creeks project site. Suitable habitat exists on the site for the following ten special-status plant species known to occur in the area: Greata’s aster (Aster greatae), Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astralagus brauntonii), Nevin’s barberry (Berberis nevinii), slender mariposa lily (Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis), Plummer’s mariposa lily (Calochortus plummerae), San Fernando valley spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. fernandina), round- leaved filaree (Erodium macrophyllum), Los Angeles sunflower (Helianthus nuttallii ssp. parishii), Davidson’s bush mallow (Malacothamnus davidsonii), and chaparral nolina (Nolina cismontana). These plant species were not observed on the site during the focused surveys; nor were any other special- status plant species. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Project Description The Hidden Creeks Estates development is proposed as a gated community with 183 single-family residential lots and 5 residential equestrian lots, associated roadways and infrastructure, a 17-acre public park, and a new equestrian boarding facility. The majority of the residential lots will be clustered on a graded, centralized plateau currently used for ongoing filming operations and grazing. 2.2 Purpose The purpose of this report is to describe the findings of focused plant surveys that were conducted at the Hidden Creeks project site. Focused surveys were conducted to determine whether any special- status plant species are present on the site that may pose development constraints to the proposed project. Special-status plants include those that are state- or federally-listed as Rare, Threatened, or Endangered, proposed for state or federal listing as Threatened or Endangered, are federal Candidate species for listing, or are state and/or federal Species of Concern. In addition, plants included on Lists 1A, 1B, 2, 3, or 4 of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) are also considered special-status. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 General Site Characteristics The project site is located within the southern reaches of the Santa Susana Mountains, near the western edge of Los Angeles County. Open space borders the site immediately to the north, south, Impact Sciences, Inc. 2 Hidden Creeks Project Site 860-001 June 2006 Special-Status Plant Survey Report east, and west. Beyond the open space to the south is Highway 118. Existing uses within the project site boundaries consist of equestrian-related facilities located in the southeastern part of the property, movie and television production facilities located in the central-eastern part of the property, and cattle ranching facilities and associated access roads located throughout the property. The regional location of the site is shown in Figure 1, Regional Context Map. Elevations within the Hidden Creeks Estates property ranges from approximately 1,350 feet above mean sea level in the southernmost extent of the property, at the confluence of Browns Canyon Wash and Mormon Canyon, to 2,145 feet in the northernmost extent. Topography on the site ranges from rolling hills with gentle slopes to steep hillsides and highly eroded streambanks. 3.2 Plant Communities There were 15 primary vegetation communities (CDFG, 2003) or land uses observed on the project site and/or in the Mason Avenue extension impact area. These include: Non-Native Grassland, Mixed Sage Scrub, Coast Live Oak Woodland, Disturbed, Coastal Sage Chaparral Scrub, California Sagebrush Scrub, Chamise Chaparral, Mixed Coast Live Oak-Willow Riparian Woodland, Tamarisk Scrub, California Walnut Woodland, Mixed California Black Walnut-Coast Live Oak Woodland, Mulefat Scrub, Mixed Willow Riparian Woodland, Bulrush-Cattail Wetland, and Mulefat Scrub-Non- Native Grassland (Figure 2, Location Dominant Plant Communities on the Hidden Creeks Estates Project Site and Impact Area.). Several of these plant communities could provide habitat for several special-status plants known to occur in the region of the site (Table 1, Special-Status Plant Species With Potential to Occur on the Hidden Creeks Project Site Based on CNDDB and CNPS Database Search Results). In addition, two plant communities, the Mixed Willow Riparian Woodland and the California Walnut Woodland, are considered sensitive natural communities by the CDFG, requiring mitigation for any acreage impacted. A complete list of species used to identify the various habitats and communities of the property is included in this report (Table 2, Plant Species Observed on the Hidden Creeks Project Site). 3.2.1 Non-Native Grassland (142.92Acres) The majority of vegetation observed on the site consisted of the Non-Native Grassland community, dominated by exotic annual grass such as wild oats (Avena fatua), foxtail barley (Hordeum murinum), and ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus). This community had a number of annual herb species as well, as plants such as black mustard (Brassica nigra), storks-bill filaree (Erodium cicutarium), and devil’s lettuce (Amsinckia intermedia) were present. Non-Native Grassland occurs in the central portion of the site, and is most likely a result of the active grazing on site. Impact Sciences, Inc. 3 Hidden Creeks Project Site 860-001 June 2006 Kern County Los Angeles County LIFORN CA IA O ALIF RNIA 14 C 138 California Aqueduct LIFORN CA IA 138 INTERSTATE 5 LIFORN CA IA LIFORN 138 CA IA 18 LIFORN CA IA 138 LIFORN Los Angeles County CA IA 14 LIFORN CA IA Santa Clarita Ventura County 126 LIFORN CA IA LIFORN 126 Project CA IA Site 2 Porter LIFORN CA IA Ranch LIFORN CA IA LIFORN 118 Mission Hills CA IA 118 2 Granada Hills Chatsworth INTERSTATE LIFORN INTERSTATE CA IA 210 405 27 Sun Valley INTERSTATE US LIFORN Warner Center CA IA LIFORN CA IA US 5 LIFORN 101 CA IA 101 170 2 LIFORN CA IA 39 INTERSTATE Woodland Hills Encino 134 Sherman Oaks 210 US LIFORNI Pasadena CA A Calabasas 101 30 South IFORN Hollywood L CA IA INTERSTATE Pasadena US LIFORN CA IA LIFORNI San Bernardino County
Recommended publications
  • Biological Resources Assessment

    Biological Resources Assessment

    APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Sierra West Assisted Living and Memory Care Project City of Santa Clarita APNs 2827-005-042 & -043 Prepared for: MR. NORRIS WHITMORE P.O. Box 55786 Valencia, CA 91385 Attn: Mr. Norris Whitmore (661) 406-0961 Prepared by: ENVICOM CORPORATION 4165 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 290 WestlaKe Village, CA 91362 Contact: Jim Anderson, Senior Biologist (818) 879-4700 ext. 234 January 2020 Revised February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 METHODS 1 2.1 Biological Resources Inventory 1 2.1.1 Literature Review 1 2.1.2 Field Survey 4 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4 4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 6 4.1 Vegetation and Plant Communities 6 4.1.1 Vegetation 6 4.1.2 Natural Communities of Special Concern 8 4.1.3 Plant Communities/Habitats Listed in CNDDB 9 4.2 Plant Species 10 4.2.1 Plant Species Observed 10 4.2.2 Special-Status Plant Species 10 4.3 Wildlife Species 12 4.3.1 Wildlife Observed 12 4.3.2 Special-Status Wildlife Species 12 4.4 Wildlife Movement 15 5.0 PROJECT IMPACTS 16 5.1 Impacts to Special-Status Plants 18 5.2 Impacts to Special-Status Wildlife 19 5.3 Impacts to Nesting Birds 20 6.0 REFERENCES 22 FIGURES Figure 1 Location Map 2 Figure 2 Aerial Image of the Project Site/Photo Location Map 3 Figure 3 Vegetation and Impacts Map 7 PLATE Plate 1 Representative Photographs of the Project Site and Habitats 5 Biological Resources Assessment S ierra West Assisted Living and Memory Care Project City of Santa Clarita i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES Table 1 Natural
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center

    2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center

    Dudek and Associates, Inc., "2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center, Los Angeles County, California" (January 2003; 2002C) 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 3 P R E P A R E D F O R : The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Blvd. Valencia, CA 91355 P R E P A R E D B Y : Dudek & Associates, Inc. 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results for the Valencia Commerce Center Los Angeles County, California Prepared for: The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Boulevard Valencia, CA 91355 Contact: Glenn Adamick Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Contact: Mark A. Elvin (760) 942-5147 January 23, 2003 2002 Sensitive Plant Survey Results Valencia Commerce Center TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.1 Plant Communities and Land Covers ................................................................5 2.2 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................5 3.0 METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS..........................................................5 3.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................6 3.2 Field Reconnaissance Methods...........................................................................6
  • Artemisia Californica Less

    Artemisia Californica Less

    I. SPECIES Artemisia californica Less. [Updated 2017] NRCS CODE: Subtribe: Artemisiinae ARCA11 Tribe: Anthemideae (FEIS CODE: Family: Asteraceae ARCAL) Order: Asterales Subclass: Asteridae Class: Magnoliopsida flowering heads spring growth seedling, March 2009 juvenile plant photos A. Montalvo flowering plant, November 2005 mature plant with flower buds August 2010 A. Subspecific taxa None. Artemisia californica Less. var. insularis (Rydb.) Munz is now recognized as Artemisia nesiotica P.H. Raven (Jepson eFlora 2017). B. Synonyms Artemisia abrotanoides Nuttall; A. fischeriana Besser; A. foliosa Nuttall; Crossostephium californicum (Lessing) Rydberg (FNA 2017). C. Common name California sagebrush. The common name refers to its strong, sage-like aroma and endemism to California and Baja California. Other names include: coastal sage, coast sage, coast sagebrush (Painter 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships The FNA (2017) places this species in subgenus Artemisia . The molecular phylogeny of the genus has improved the understanding of relationships among the many species of Artemisia and has, at times, placed the species in subgenus Tridentadae; morphology of the inflorescences and flowers alone does not place this species with its closest relatives (Watson et al. 2002). The detailed phylogeny is not completely resolved (Hayat et al. 2009). E. Related taxa in region There are 18 species and a total of 31 taxa (including infrataxa) of Artemisia in southern California, all of which differ clearly from A. californica in habitat affinity, structure, or both (Munz 1974, Jepson eFlora 2017). Within subgenus Artemisia (as per FNA 2017), A. nesiotica from the Channel Islands is the most similar and was once considered part of A. californica ; it can be distinguished by its wider leaves with flat leaf margins (not rolled under).
  • Species Report for the San Fernando Valley Spineflower (Chorizanthe Parryi Var

    Species Report for the San Fernando Valley Spineflower (Chorizanthe Parryi Var

    Comments on “Species Report for the San Fernando Valley Spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. fernandina)” The report presents a misleading representation of the threat of Argentine ant invasion into the areas planned for development by the Newhall Land Company and inadequate information regarding the pollination biology of the SFVS (San Fernando Valley Spineflower). For these reasons, my professional opinion, which is based on over 20 years of experience studying the Argentine ant in the field in California, is that additional research would have to be conducted to assess how the planned developments would impact the Santa Clarita populations of SFVS. In the sections of the report dealing with Argentine ant invasion, several points require clarification. (1) In the interior portions of southern California, the Argentine ant is limited by soil moisture and tends to occur primarily in riparian woodlands and irrigated areas, which can include urban, suburban and agricultural environments. That said, all of the isolated patches of SFVS in Santa Clarita, if exposed to the development illustrated in Figure 4 of the report, would likely be vulnerable to Argentine ant invasion given that they would be surrounded either by urban development or by the Santa Clarita River riparian corridor. Planned urban and suburban developments would affect (and mostly increase) soil moisture levels in unexpected ways by changing impermeable surface cover, storm water run off, flood control measures, irrigation, and landscaping. These changes will increase the risk that isolated SFVS reserves will become invaded by the Argentine ant but will likely do so in ways that are not easy to predict.
  • Eldorado National Forest Placerville Ranger District Biological Assessment / Evaluation for Botanical Species

    Eldorado National Forest Placerville Ranger District Biological Assessment / Evaluation for Botanical Species

    ELDORADO NATIONAL FOREST PLACERVILLE RANGER DISTRICT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT / EVALUATION FOR BOTANICAL SPECIES: PILLIKEN FOREST HEALTH PROJECT 2016 Prepared By: /s/ Matt Brown Date: 4/13/2016 . Matt Brown Botanist Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 II. CONSULTATION TO DATE ....................................................................................... 6 III. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............................................................... 6 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 7 V. EXISTING SPECIES AND HABITAT CONDITION ................................................. 7 VI. EFFECTS .................................................................................................................... 16 VII. OTHER MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ..................... 16 VIII. MITIGATIONS AND MONITORING ................................................................... 19 IX. DETERMINATION ................................................................................................... 19 X. REFERENCES............................................................................................................. 20 APPENDIX A: BOTANY REPORT FOR SPECIAL INTEREST PLANTS .................. 21 APPENDIX B: NOXIOUS WEED RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................. 27 APPENDIX C: NOXIOUS/INVASIVE WEEDS OF CONCERN .................................
  • Biological Assessment 2730 Onyx, Los Angeles, California

    Biological Assessment 2730 Onyx, Los Angeles, California

    H AMILTON B IOLOGICAL February 6, 2020 Henry Suarez Yalla Yalla LLC 1030 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 201 La Cañada, CA, 91011 SUBJECT: BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2730 ONYX, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Suarez, At your request, Hamilton Biological has prepared this biological assessment that the City of Los Angeles (the City) has requested in association with planning of a proposed residential project at 2730 Onyx Drive. The property covers 3.90 acres and is located in the eastern part of Los Angeles (Figures 1, 2). Figure 1. Regional Location Scale 1 inch = 2 miles Hamilton Biological Figure 1. The 3.9-acre project site is located in the in the eastern part of the City of Los Angeles. Aerial Source: Google Earth Pro. 316 Monrovia Avenue Long Beach, CA 90803 562-477-2181 [email protected] Biological Assessment, 2730 Onyx Drive, Los Angeles Hamilton Biological, Inc. February 6, 2020 Page 2 of 15 Figure 2. Project Vicinity Scale 1 inch = 1500 feet Hamilton Biological Figure 2. The property is located west of North Mission Road /Huntington Drive North, and north of Commo- dore Street. The surrounding land uses consist of low-density hillside residential housing and light industrial. Natural open space of Ascot Hills Park lies a sixth of a mile to the east, and Abraham Lincoln Senior High School lies a quarter-mile to the southwest. Aerial Source: Google Earth Pro. The proposed project involves grading most of the site to construct 32 single-family res- idences and associated infrastructure. The goals of this study were: (1) to characterize the property’s vegetation; (2) to identify the plant and wildlife species observed on the property; (3) to evaluate the potential for any listed and otherwise sensitive plant or wildlife species to occur on the property; and (4) to determine whether implementation of the proposed project could entail any impacts considered significant under the Cali- fornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3

    Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3

    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
  • Paper Version of Palos Verdes

    Paper Version of Palos Verdes

    Selected Plants Native to Palos Verdes Peninsula (C.M. Rodrigue, 07/26/11) http://www.csulb.edu/geography/PV/ Succulents (plants with fleshy, often liquid-saturated leaves and/or stems. These features can be found in a variety of life forms, including annual herbaceous plants, vines, shrubs, and trees, as well as cacti) Herbaceous plants (non-woody, though there may be a woody caudex or basal stem and root -- annual growth dies back each year, resprouting in perennial or biennial plants, or the plant dies and is replaced by a new generation each year in the case of annual plants) Extremely tiny plant. Stems only about 2-6 cm tall, occasionally as much as 10 cm, leaves only 1-3 mm long (can get up to 6 mm long), fleshy, found at the plant's base or on the stems, shape generally ovate (egg-shaped), may have a blunt rounded end or a fine acute tip. The leaves are arranged oppositely, not alternately. The plant is green when new but ages to red or pink. Tiny flower (0.5- 2 mm) borne in leaf axils, usually just one per leaf pair on a pedicel (floral stem) less than 6 mm long. Two or 3 petals and 3 or 4 sepals. Flowers February to May. Annual herb. Found in open areas, in rocky nooks and crannies, and sometimes in vernal ponds (temporary pools that form after a rain and then slowly evaporate). Crassula connata (Crassulaceae): pygmy stonecrop or pygmy-weed or sand pygmyweed Leaves converted into scales along stems, which are arranged alternately and overlap.
  • Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey

    Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey

    Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. EIN 72-1598095 Daniel S. Cooper, President 5850 W. 3rd St. #167 Los Angeles, CA 90036 (323) 397-3562 [email protected] Griffith Park Rare Plant Survey Plummer's mariposa-lily Calochortus plummerae (CNPS 1B.2) blooms near Skyline Trail in the northeastern corner of Griffith Park, 26 May 2010 (ph. DSC). Prepared by: Daniel S. Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. October 2010 1 Part I. Summary of Findings Part II (species accounts) begins after p. 26. We present information on extant occurrences of 15 special-status species, subspecies and/or varieties of vascular plants in Griffith Park and contiguous open space, including three for which no known local specimen existed prior to this study: slender mariposa-lily (Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis; CNPS 1B.2), Humboldt lily (Lilium humboldtii var. ocellatum; CNPS 4.2), and Hubby's phacelia (Phacelia hubbyi; CNPS 4.2). Using lists developed by local botanists, we document - from specimens or digital photographs - extant occurrences of nearly 40 additional plant taxa felt to be of conservation concern in the eastern Santa Monica Mountains, including 16 for which no prior specimen existed for the park or surrounding open space. We also identify several dozen taxa known from the specimen record but unconfirmed in the park in recent years. From this information, we discuss patterns of occurrence of rare plants in the park, drawing attention to "hotspots" for rare species diversity, such as Spring Canyon and Royce Canyon, and identify areas, particularly in the northeastern corner of the park and along the southeastern border, where rare plants are relatively poorly represented in the landscape.
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern

    Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern

    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
  • 1.26 Chaparral Nolina (Nolina Cismontana) – Category SL

    1.26 Chaparral Nolina (Nolina Cismontana) – Category SL

    Volume 2D: Goals and Objectives for Species Focus Management Species 1.0 Plants 1.26 Chaparral Nolina (Nolina cismontana) – Category SL Management Units with Known Occurrences Chaparral nolina occurs in coastal sage scrub and open chaparral habitats in foothills from Ventura County south to San Diego County (Reiser 1994; Hess and Dice 1995; CNPS 2011). In the MSPA, the only known occurrence on Conserved Lands in the MSPA is in MU5 at Hellhole Canyon Preserve (see Occurrence Table or online map: http://arcg.is/2kFKRpZ); however, another occurrence was found in 2001 in MU4 on Conserved Lands in Cleveland National Forest (CNF), though its status is currently unknown (SANBIOS 2015). The occurrence on CNF lands burned in 2003 and 2007 and may no longer be extant. It was detected in 2005 following the 2003 fire; however, it was not observed during surveys in 2008 after the 2007 fire. Outside the MSPA, 3 occurrences were found on U.S. Forest Service lands at Viejas Mountain (CCH 2013; SDNHM 2013). Three more occurrences were found in MU8 on private, unconserved lands in the Pala area (SANBIOS 2013; SDNHM 2013). In 2015, 1 occurrence was found on military lands (CCH 2017; SDNHM 2017). Management Categorization Rationale Chaparral nolina should be managed as a Species Management Focus Category SL Species due to a high risk of loss from Conserved Lands in the MSPA and because managing chaparral and coastal sage scrub habitats alone will not ensure its persistence (see Vol. 1, Table 2-4). Chaparral nolina is at high risk of loss from the MSPA as there are only 1 to 2 recent occurrences on Conserved Lands.