DOCSLIB.ORG

Radio Occultation of Saturn's Rings with the Cassini Spacecraft: Ring Microstructure Inferred from Near-Forward Radio Wave

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radio Occultation of Saturn's Rings with the Cassini Spacecraft: Ring Microstructure Inferred from Near-Forward Radio Wave RADIO OCCULTATION OF SATURN’S RINGS WITH THE CASSINI SPACECRAFT: RING MICROSTRUCTURE INFERRED FROM NEAR-FORWARD RADIO WAVE SCATTERING A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Fraser Stuart Thomson July 2010 © 2010 by Fraser Stuart Thomson. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/pb657pg3502 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Howard Zebker, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Per Enge I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Essam Marouf Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii iv Abstract The Cassini spacecraft is a robotic probe sent from Earth to orbit and explore the planet Saturn, its moons, and its expansive ring system. Between May 3 and Au- gust 2 of 2005, we undertook a series of radio occultation experiments, during which the Cassini spacecraft operated in conjunction with the NASA Deep Space Network (DSN) to probe the rings at three distinct radio wavelengths. During our occultation experiments, Cassini flies behind the rings of Saturn as viewed from Earth and transmits coherent radio signals at wavelengths of 13 cm, 3.6 cm, and 0.94 cm, in the radio bands known as S, X, and Ka, respectively. These signals pass through the rings and are received and recorded on Earth at the large antenna complexes of the DSN. At each of the three transmitted frequency channels, the received signal comprises two components, i) a direct (coherent) component, which is the transmitted sinusoid, attenuated and phase shifted by the average effect of its interaction with the interceding ring material, and ii) a scattered (incoherent) signal component, comprising energy that is forward-scattered towards the receiver from all of the ring particles illuminated by the transmitting antenna’s beam. The time- and spatially-averaged diffraction signature of ring microstructure—which forms when individual ring particles organize into large clusters or groups under the influence of collisional and self-gravitational forces—is superimposed on the scattered signal. Coherent radio waves transmitted by the Cassini spacecraft are diffracted at vari- ous locations in Ring A and B and indicate the presence of fine-scale structure showing periodic variation in optical depth, which we refer to as periodic microstructure (PM). We interpret the observed spectral signature using simple diffraction grating models, yielding estimates of the structural period λgr ≈ 100–250 meters. In particular, two v regions in Ring A at radial locations 123.05–123.4 × 103 km and 123.6–124.6 × 103 + + km yield average estimates of λgr=163−6 meters and λgr=217−8 meters, respectively. Three regions in Ring B at radial locations 92.1–92.6 × 103 km, 99.0–104.5 × 103 × 3 +20 + km, and 110.0–115.0 10 km yield average estimates of λgr=115−15, 146−14, and +150 250−75 meters, respectively. In all regions, the structure appears to be azimuthally o ≤ ≤ o symmetric with mean orientation angles ranging between -2.8 φgr 1.5 . Prior to Cassini, axisymmetric periodic microstructure was predicted by fluid dynamical theory and by the results of dynamical simulations of the rings, but was not observed experimentally. Our observations are the first to directly observe PM in the rings, and to report estimates of its structural period and orientation in five distinct regions across Rings A and B. vi Acknowledgements I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to Howard Zebker for taking over from Len Tyler as my primary advisor in early 2008. Without his support, it is unlikely that I would have completed this degree program. I will always be in his debt for his acts of kindness and support. Sincere thanks are due to Essam Marouf, who always made the effort to find time in his busy schedule for my many questions. Essam has been a model of patience, diligence, and excellence during our years of collaboration, and his steady provision of guidance, tutelage, and financial support has made this work possible. His ethics and commitment to excellence in his work form an ideal that all scientists should aspire to, and which many on the Cassini radio science team depend on and are indebted to. One of the most memorable moments in my life is being at JPL during the first planned Cassini radio occultation experiment, and watching how excited Essam and Dick French were as we all watched the spectrum of the received signal varying in real time, as the experiment revealed hints of ring structure. Throughout my years at Stanford, it has been a great privilege and joy for me to observe Essam’s passion for the rings firsthand. Thanks also to Per Enge for serving as my third reader, for serving on my oral defense committee, and for teaching me about orbital mechanics and GPS. He is an excellent professor and a friend to many students, myself included. I extend many thanks to my teacher and friend Ivan Linscott, who always has time to discuss new ideas and old ones, and for being such a generous friend to many students over the years. Thanks also to Antony Fraser-Smith for stepping in to save the day on several occasions, for serving on my defense committee, and for being such vii a great guy in general. Special thanks go to Len Tyler for all of his time, energy, and support, and for being a mentor to me for several years prior to his semi-retirement. Len is a polymath, and memories of times when I have glimpsed his brilliance will always bring a smile to my face. On those rare occasions when Len did not know the answer, his honest and free willingness to admit gaps in his knowledge provide an inspirational lesson to us all; there is no better way to get started solving a problem than to admit what is known and what is not known. Len’s insistent attention to detail has taught me to choose my words more carefully, and has made me a better technical writer. As Len would say, a key goal in writing is to minimize the impedance mismatch between the writer and their audience. I hope I have done that here. A very special thanks to Sami Asmar of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, for being a friend and a great boss during my all-too-brief work terms at the lab. I would be honored to work with him or for him again, anytime and anywhere. I would also like to thank Christopher Chyba, my friend and mentor, and one of the kindest and smartest people I’ve ever known. The nine months that we collaborated before I chose to join Cassini was the most exciting and fulfilling period of time that I spent at Stanford. Lots of love and thanks to my parents, who provided access to all of the oppor- tunities that anyone could ever ask for in life. I would not be writing this without them. There are many other people who, either knowingly or unknowingly, helped to make this dissertation possible. To the anonymous, I offer my thanks also. I dedicate this dissertation to my wife Katherine and to my son Kaiden (b. June 7, 2009), for showing me how simple life really is, and for being a constant reminder of what is truly important. This work was supported by the NASA Cassini Project through JPL Contract No. 1214216. The support is gratefully acknowledged. viii Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vii 1 Introduction and Historical Review 11 1.1 The Discovery of Saturn’s Rings ..................... 12 1.2 Occultation Studies of Saturn’s Rings: A Brief History ........ 20 1.3 Contents and Contributions of this Dissertation ............ 22 2 Saturn Ring Structure and Dynamics 27 2.1 Ring Macrostructure ........................... 33 2.1.1 Gaps and Ring Boundaries .................... 34 2.1.2 Spiral Density and Bending Waves ............... 38 2.2 Ring Microstructure ........................... 40 2.2.1 Gravitational Wakes ....................... 40 2.2.2 Periodic Microstructure ..................... 42 2.3 Models of Ring Microstructure ...................... 44 2.4 Summary ................................. 47 3 EM Scattering and Diffraction from Ring Particle Clusters 49 3.1 Introduction ................................ 50 3.2 Theoretical Background ......................... 53 3.2.1 Coherent Scattering from a Sphere: Mie Theory ........ 56 3.2.2 Multi-ParticleScatteringUsingMieTheory.......... 60 ix 3.2.3 Diffraction from an Amplitude Screen .............. 64 3.2.4 Mie and Diffraction Theory: Some Practical Considerations . 66 3.3SimulationResults............................ 68 3.3.1 Scattering from a Single Sphere ................. 70 3.3.2 Scattering from Two and Three Spheres ............ 71 3.3.3 Scattering from Ten Spheres ................... 77 3.4 Discussion ................................. 83 3.5 Amplitude Screen Model Results for Thick, Homogeneous Rings .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Galileo and the Telescope
    Galileo and the Telescope A Discussion of Galileo Galilei and the Beginning of Modern Observational Astronomy ___________________________ Billy Teets, Ph.D. Acting Director and Outreach Astronomer, Vanderbilt University Dyer Observatory Tuesday, October 20, 2020 Image Credit: Giuseppe Bertini General Outline • Telescopes/Galileo’s Telescopes • Observations of the Moon • Observations of Jupiter • Observations of Other Planets • The Milky Way • Sunspots Brief History of the Telescope – Hans Lippershey • Dutch Spectacle Maker • Invention credited to Hans Lippershey (c. 1608 - refracting telescope) • Late 1608 – Dutch gov’t: “ a device by means of which all things at a very great distance can be seen as if they were nearby” • Is said he observed two children playing with lenses • Patent not awarded Image Source: Wikipedia Galileo and the Telescope • Created his own – 3x magnification. • Similar to what was peddled in Europe. • Learned magnification depended on the ratio of lens focal lengths. • Had to learn to grind his own lenses. Image Source: Britannica.com Image Source: Wikipedia Refracting Telescopes Bend Light Refracting Telescopes Chromatic Aberration Chromatic aberration limits ability to distinguish details Dealing with Chromatic Aberration - Stop Down Aperture Galileo used cardboard rings to limit aperture – Results were dimmer views but less chromatic aberration Galileo and the Telescope • Created his own (3x, 8-9x, 20x, etc.) • Noted by many for its military advantages August 1609 Galileo and the Telescope • First observed the
    [Show full text]
  • The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion
    References The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion Leah Ganis May 30th, 2013 Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References Outline of Talk I Introduction to Problem I The Basics: Hamiltonian, Equations of Motion, Fixed Points, Stability I Linear Modes I The Progressing Ellipse and Other Regular Motions I Chaotic Motion I References Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References Introduction The swinging spring, or elastic pendulum, is a simple mechanical system in which many different types of motion can occur. The system is comprised of a heavy mass, attached to an essentially massless spring which does not deform. The system moves under the force of gravity and in accordance with Hooke's Law. z y r φ x k m Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References The Basics We can write down the equations of motion by finding the Lagrangian of the system and using the Euler-Lagrange equations. The Lagrangian, L is given by L = T − V where T is the kinetic energy of the system and V is the potential energy. Leah Ganis The Swinging Spring: Regular and Chaotic Motion References The Basics In Cartesian coordinates, the kinetic energy is given by the following: 1 T = m(_x2 +y _ 2 +z _2) 2 and the potential is given by the sum of gravitational potential and the spring potential: 1 V = mgz + k(r − l )2 2 0 where m is the mass, g is the gravitational constant, k the spring constant, r the stretched length of the spring (px2 + y 2 + z2), and l0 the unstretched length of the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Planetary Rings Matthew S
    7 Planetary Rings Matthew S. Tiscareno Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA 1Introduction..................................................... 311 1.1 Orbital Elements ..................................................... 312 1.2 Roche Limits, Roche Lobes, and Roche Critical Densities .................... 313 1.3 Optical Depth ....................................................... 316 2 Rings by Planetary System .......................................... 317 2.1 The Rings of Jupiter ................................................... 317 2.2 The Rings of Saturn ................................................... 319 2.3 The Rings of Uranus .................................................. 320 2.4 The Rings of Neptune ................................................. 323 2.5 Unconfirmed Ring Systems ............................................. 324 2.5.1 Mars ............................................................... 324 2.5.2 Pluto ............................................................... 325 2.5.3 Rhea and Other Moons ................................................ 325 2.5.4 Exoplanets ........................................................... 327 3RingsbyType.................................................... 328 3.1 Dense Broad Disks ................................................... 328 3.1.1 Spiral Waves ......................................................... 329 3.1.2 Gap Edges and Moonlet Wakes .......................................... 333 3.1.3 Radial Structure .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Modelling Forward Light Scattering in the Human Eye
    MEASURING AND MODELLING FORWARD LIGHT SCATTERING IN THE HUMAN EYE A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Faculty of Life Sciences. 2015 Pablo Benito López Optometry THESIS CONTENT THESIS CONTENT ...................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 10 LIST OF EQUATIONS ............................................................................................................... 11 ABBREVIATIONS LIST ........................................................................................................... 12 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 13 DECLARATION .......................................................................................................................... 14 THESIS FORMAT ....................................................................................................................... 14 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Elastic Pendulum Qisong Xiao; Shenghao Xia ; Corey Zammit; Nirantha Balagopal; Zijun Li Agenda
    Dynamics of the Elastic Pendulum Qisong Xiao; Shenghao Xia ; Corey Zammit; Nirantha Balagopal; Zijun Li Agenda • Introduction to the elastic pendulum problem • Derivations of the equations of motion • Real-life examples of an elastic pendulum • Trivial cases & equilibrium states • MATLAB models The Elastic Problem (Simple Harmonic Motion) 푑2푥 푑2푥 푘 • 퐹 = 푚 = −푘푥 = − 푥 푛푒푡 푑푡2 푑푡2 푚 • Solve this differential equation to find 푥 푡 = 푐1 cos 휔푡 + 푐2 sin 휔푡 = 퐴푐표푠(휔푡 − 휑) • With velocity and acceleration 푣 푡 = −퐴휔 sin 휔푡 + 휑 푎 푡 = −퐴휔2cos(휔푡 + 휑) • Total energy of the system 퐸 = 퐾 푡 + 푈 푡 1 1 1 = 푚푣푡2 + 푘푥2 = 푘퐴2 2 2 2 The Pendulum Problem (with some assumptions) • With position vector of point mass 푥 = 푙 푠푖푛휃푖 − 푐표푠휃푗 , define 푟 such that 푥 = 푙푟 and 휃 = 푐표푠휃푖 + 푠푖푛휃푗 • Find the first and second derivatives of the position vector: 푑푥 푑휃 = 푙 휃 푑푡 푑푡 2 푑2푥 푑2휃 푑휃 = 푙 휃 − 푙 푟 푑푡2 푑푡2 푑푡 • From Newton’s Law, (neglecting frictional force) 푑2푥 푚 = 퐹 + 퐹 푑푡2 푔 푡 The Pendulum Problem (with some assumptions) Defining force of gravity as 퐹푔 = −푚푔푗 = 푚푔푐표푠휃푟 − 푚푔푠푖푛휃휃 and tension of the string as 퐹푡 = −푇푟 : 2 푑휃 −푚푙 = 푚푔푐표푠휃 − 푇 푑푡 푑2휃 푚푙 = −푚푔푠푖푛휃 푑푡2 Define 휔0 = 푔/푙 to find the solution: 푑2휃 푔 = − 푠푖푛휃 = −휔2푠푖푛휃 푑푡2 푙 0 Derivation of Equations of Motion • m = pendulum mass • mspring = spring mass • l = unstreatched spring length • k = spring constant • g = acceleration due to gravity • Ft = pre-tension of spring 푚푔−퐹 • r = static spring stretch, 푟 = 푡 s 푠 푘 • rd = dynamic spring stretch • r = total spring stretch 푟푠 + 푟푑 Derivation of Equations of Motion
    [Show full text]
  • Compound Light Microscopes Magnification
    Compound Light Microscopes • Frequently used tools of biologists. • Magnify organisms too small to be seen with the unaided eye. • To use: – Sandwich specimen between transparent slide and thin, transparent coverslip. – Shine light through specimen into lenses of microscope. • Lens closest to object is objective lens. • Lens closest to your eye is the ocular lens. • The image viewed through a compound light microscope is formed by the projection of light through a mounted specimen on a slide. Eyepiece/ ocular lens Magnification Nosepiece Arm Objectives/ • Magnification - the process of objective lens enlarging something in appearance, not Stage Clips Light intensity knob actual physical size. Stage Coarse DiaphragmDiaphragm Adjustment Fine Adjustment Light Positioning knobs Source Base Always carry a microscope with one hand holding the arm and one hand under the base. What’s my power? Comparing Powers of Magnification To calculate the power of magnification or total magnification, multiply the power of the ocular lens by the We can see better details with higher power of the objective. the powers of magnification, but we cannot see as much of the image. Which of these images would be viewed at a higher power of magnification? 1 Resolution Limit of resolution • Resolution - the shortest distance • As magnifying power increases, we see between two points more detail. on a specimen that • There is a point where we can see no can still be more detail is the limit of resolution. distinguished as – Beyond the limit of resolution, objects get two points. blurry and detail is lost. – Use electron microscopes to reveal detail beyond the limit of resolution of a compound light microscope! Proper handling technique Field of view 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14. Saturn and Its Attendants
    14. Saturn and Its Attendants 1 Chapter 14. Saturn and Its Attendants Figure 14.3. A Voyager portrait. Note. In this section we survey physical properties of Saturn. Note. Some general facts about Saturn include: Orbital Period 29.5 years Rotation Period 10 hours 40 minutes Tilt of Axis 26◦ Mass 95 times Earth’s mass Surface Gravity 1.13 of Earth’s Albedo 34% Satellites 17 known Galileo was the first to see Saturn’s rings. Huygens explained them as rings and discovered the moon Titan. Cassini observed gaps in the rings and discovered four satellites. Saturn also has differential rotation, and a composition similar to that of Jupiter. 14. Saturn and Its Attendants 2 Note. Saturn is similar to Jupiter, with belts and zones, but the contrast on Saturn is less extreme. Rising and descending gas combines with rapid rotation to form strips circling the planet, as on Jupiter. The interior is similar to Jupiter, with a very thick layer of clouds, a layer of liquid hydrogen and helium, a layer of liquid metallic hydrogen, and a rock-and-ice solid core. Saturn puts out 1.8 times as much energy as it takes in, the excess is from continued differentiation (the heavy stuff sinks and releases energy). Saturn has a magnetic field slightly stronger than Earth’s and its magnetosphere fluctuates in size with solar activity. Figure 14.7. The internal structure of Saturn. Note. There is evidence for as many as 22 satellites. Of primary concern are (in no particular order): Titan. It is only one of two satellites that has an atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 11: the Compound Microscope
    OPTI 202L - Geometrical and Instrumental Optics Lab 9-1 LAB 9: THE COMPOUND MICROSCOPE The microscope is a widely used optical instrument. In its simplest form, it consists of two lenses Fig. 9.1. An objective forms a real inverted image of an object, which is a finite distance in front of the lens. This image in turn becomes the object for the ocular, or eyepiece. The eyepiece forms the final image which is virtual, and magnified. The overall magnification is the product of the individual magnifications of the objective and the eyepiece. Figure 9.1. Images in a compound microscope. To illustrate the concept, use a 38 mm focal length lens (KPX079) as the objective, and a 50 mm focal length lens (KBX052) as the eyepiece. Set them up on the optical rail and adjust them until you see an inverted and magnified image of an illuminated object. Note the intermediate real image by inserting a piece of paper between the lenses. Q1 ● Can you demonstrate the final image by holding a piece of paper behind the eyepiece? Why or why not? The eyepiece functions as a magnifying glass, or simple magnifier. In effect, your eye looks into the eyepiece, and in turn the eyepiece looks into the optical system--be it a compound microscope, a spotting scope, telescope, or binocular. In all cases, the eyepiece doesn't view an actual object, but rather some intermediate image formed by the "front" part of the optical system. With telescopes, this intermediate image may be real or virtual. With the compound microscope, this intermediate image is real, formed by the objective lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers in Optics: Christiaan Huygens
    Downloaded from Microscopy Pioneers https://www.cambridge.org/core Pioneers in Optics: Christiaan Huygens Eric Clark From the website Molecular Expressions created by the late Michael Davidson and now maintained by Eric Clark, National Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 . IP address: [email protected] 170.106.33.22 Christiaan Huygens reliability and accuracy. The first watch using this principle (1629–1695) was finished in 1675, whereupon it was promptly presented , on Christiaan Huygens was a to his sponsor, King Louis XIV. 29 Sep 2021 at 16:11:10 brilliant Dutch mathematician, In 1681, Huygens returned to Holland where he began physicist, and astronomer who lived to construct optical lenses with extremely large focal lengths, during the seventeenth century, a which were eventually presented to the Royal Society of period sometimes referred to as the London, where they remain today. Continuing along this line Scientific Revolution. Huygens, a of work, Huygens perfected his skills in lens grinding and highly gifted theoretical and experi- subsequently invented the achromatic eyepiece that bears his , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at mental scientist, is best known name and is still in widespread use today. for his work on the theories of Huygens left Holland in 1689, and ventured to London centrifugal force, the wave theory of where he became acquainted with Sir Isaac Newton and began light, and the pendulum clock. to study Newton’s theories on classical physics. Although it At an early age, Huygens began seems Huygens was duly impressed with Newton’s work, he work in advanced mathematics was still very skeptical about any theory that did not explain by attempting to disprove several theories established by gravitation by mechanical means.
    [Show full text]
  • Depth of Focus (DOF)
    Erect Image Depth of Focus (DOF) unit: mm Also known as ‘depth of field’, this is the distance (measured in the An image in which the orientations of left, right, top, bottom and direction of the optical axis) between the two planes which define the moving directions are the same as those of a workpiece on the limits of acceptable image sharpness when the microscope is focused workstage. PG on an object. As the numerical aperture (NA) increases, the depth of 46 focus becomes shallower, as shown by the expression below: λ DOF = λ = 0.55µm is often used as the reference wavelength 2·(NA)2 Field number (FN), real field of view, and monitor display magnification unit: mm Example: For an M Plan Apo 100X lens (NA = 0.7) The depth of focus of this objective is The observation range of the sample surface is determined by the diameter of the eyepiece’s field stop. The value of this diameter in 0.55µm = 0.6µm 2 x 0.72 millimeters is called the field number (FN). In contrast, the real field of view is the range on the workpiece surface when actually magnified and observed with the objective lens. Bright-field Illumination and Dark-field Illumination The real field of view can be calculated with the following formula: In brightfield illumination a full cone of light is focused by the objective on the specimen surface. This is the normal mode of viewing with an (1) The range of the workpiece that can be observed with the optical microscope. With darkfield illumination, the inner area of the microscope (diameter) light cone is blocked so that the surface is only illuminated by light FN of eyepiece Real field of view = from an oblique angle.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12 the Rings and Moons of the Outer Planets October 15, 2018
    Lecture 12 The Rings and Moons of the Outer Planets October 15, 2018 1 2 Rings of Outer Planets • Rings are not solid but are fragments of material – Saturn: Ice and ice-coated rock (bright) – Others: Dusty ice, rocky material (dark) • Very thin – Saturn rings ~0.05 km thick! • Rings can have many gaps due to small satellites – Saturn and Uranus 3 Rings of Jupiter •Very thin and made of small, dark particles. 4 Rings of Saturn Flash movie 5 Saturn’s Rings Ring structure in natural color, photographed by Cassini probe July 23, 2004. Click on image for Astronomy Picture of the Day site, or here for JPL information 6 Saturn’s Rings (false color) Photo taken by Voyager 2 on August 17, 1981. Click on image for more information 7 Saturn’s Ring System (Cassini) Mars Mimas Janus Venus Prometheus A B C D F G E Pandora Enceladus Epimetheus Earth Tethys Moon Wikipedia image with annotations On July 19, 2013, in an event celebrated the world over, NASA's Cassini spacecraft slipped into Saturn's shadow and turned to image the planet, seven of its moons, its inner rings -- and, in the background, our home planet, Earth. 8 Newly Discovered Saturnian Ring • Nearly invisible ring in the plane of the moon Pheobe’s orbit, tilted 27° from Saturn’s equatorial plane • Discovered by the infrared Spitzer Space Telescope and announced 6 October 2009 • Extends from 128 to 207 Saturnian radii and is about 40 radii thick • Contributes to the two-tone coloring of the moon Iapetus • Click here for more info about the artist’s rendering 9 Rings of Uranus • Uranus -- rings discovered through stellar occultation – Rings block light from star as Uranus moves by.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018: Aiaa-Space-Report
    AIAA TEAM SPACE TRANSPORTATION DESIGN COMPETITION TEAM PERSEPHONE Submitted By: Chelsea Dalton Ashley Miller Ryan Decker Sahil Pathan Layne Droppers Joshua Prentice Zach Harmon Andrew Townsend Nicholas Malone Nicholas Wijaya Iowa State University Department of Aerospace Engineering May 10, 2018 TEAM PERSEPHONE Page I Iowa State University: Persephone Design Team Chelsea Dalton Ryan Decker Layne Droppers Zachary Harmon Trajectory & Propulsion Communications & Power Team Lead Thermal Systems AIAA ID #908154 AIAA ID #906791 AIAA ID #532184 AIAA ID #921129 Nicholas Malone Ashley Miller Sahil Pathan Joshua Prentice Orbit Design Science Science Science AIAA ID #921128 AIAA ID #922108 AIAA ID #761247 AIAA ID #922104 Andrew Townsend Nicholas Wijaya Structures & CAD Trajectory & Propulsion AIAA ID #820259 AIAA ID #644893 TEAM PERSEPHONE Page II Contents 1 Introduction & Problem Background2 1.1 Motivation & Background......................................2 1.2 Mission Definition..........................................3 2 Mission Overview 5 2.1 Trade Study Tools..........................................5 2.2 Mission Architecture.........................................6 2.3 Planetary Protection.........................................6 3 Science 8 3.1 Observations of Interest.......................................8 3.2 Goals.................................................9 3.3 Instrumentation............................................ 10 3.3.1 Visible and Infrared Imaging|Ralph............................ 11 3.3.2 Radio Science Subsystem.................................
    [Show full text]