Free Software Testing Tools for Web Applications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EVALUATING and SELECTING SOFTWARE TEST AUTOMATION TOOLS Synthesizing Empirical Evidence from Practitioners
A 752 OULU 2020 A 752 UNIVERSITY OF OULU P.O. Box 8000 FI-90014 UNIVERSITY OF OULU FINLAND ACTA UNIVERSITATISUNIVERSITATIS OULUENSISOULUENSIS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS ACTAACTA SCIENTIAESCIENTIAEA A RERUMRERUM Päivi Raulamo-Jurvanen NATURALIUMNATURALIUM Päivi Raulamo-Jurvanen University Lecturer Tuomo Glumoff EVALUATING AND University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen SELECTING SOFTWARE TEST Postdoctoral researcher Jani Peräntie AUTOMATION TOOLS SYNTHESIZING EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM University Lecturer Anne Tuomisto PRACTITIONERS University Lecturer Veli-Matti Ulvinen Planning Director Pertti Tikkanen Professor Jari Juga University Lecturer Anu Soikkeli University Lecturer Santeri Palviainen UNIVERSITY OF OULU GRADUATE SCHOOL; UNIVERSITY OF OULU, FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Publications Editor Kirsti Nurkkala ISBN 978-952-62-2765-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-2766-5 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3191 (Print) ISSN 1796-220X (Online) ACTA UNIVERSITATIS OULUENSIS A Scientiae Rerum Naturalium 752 PÄIVI RAULAMO-JURVANEN EVALUATING AND SELECTING SOFTWARE TEST AUTOMATION TOOLS Synthesizing Empirical Evidence from Practitioners Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Doctoral Training Committee of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering of the University of Oulu for public defence in the OP auditorium (L10), Linnanmaa, on 13 November 2020, at 12 noon UNIVERSITY OF OULU, OULU 2020 Copyright © 2020 Acta Univ. Oul. A 752, 2020 Supervised by Professor Mika Mäntylä Professor Burak Turhan Associate Professor Vahid Garousi Reviewed by Associate Professor Filippo Ricca Associate Professor Viktoria Stray Opponent Professor Kari Smolander ISBN 978-952-62-2765-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-952-62-2766-5 (PDF) ISSN 0355-3191 (Printed) ISSN 1796-220X (Online) Cover Design Raimo Ahonen PUNAMUSTA TAMPERE 2020 Raulamo-Jurvanen, Päivi, Evaluating and Selecting Software Test Automation Tools. -
Software License Agreement
ESSENTIAL STUDIO SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT This Software License Agreement (the “Agreement”) is a legal agreement between you (“You”, “Your”, or “Customer”) and Syncfusion, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 2501 Aerial Center Parkway, Suite 200, Morrisville, NC 27560 (“Syncfusion”). This license is for Essential Studio Enterprise Edition, Essential Studio WPF Edition, Essential Studio PDF Edition, Essential Studio Xamarin Edition, and Essential Studio Win Forms Edition. Syncfusion licenses its products on a per-copy basis (referred to below as Retail Licenses) or under a project license, a corporate division license, or an enterprise license. Your right to use any given copy of a Syncfusion Essential Studio software product is generally set forth in this Agreement. In the event that your copy of this software product is licensed under a project license, a division license, or global license, additional terms and conditions shall also apply which will be set forth in a separate written and signed agreement. Carefully read all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement prior to downloading and/or installing or using the Licensed Product (as that term is defined below). This Agreement between you and Syncfusion sets forth the terms and conditions of your use of the Licensed Product. For the purposes of this Agreement, the effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which you click the “YES” button below. BY CLICKING THE “YES” BUTTON, YOU ARE ACCEPTING ALL OF THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT CONSTITUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. -
Automated Web Application Testing Using Search Based Software Engineering
Automated Web Application Testing Using Search Based Software Engineering Nadia Alshahwan and Mark Harman CREST Centre University College London London, UK fnadia.alshahwan.10,[email protected] Abstract—This paper introduces three related algorithms and [21]. However, of 399 research papers on SBST,1 only one a tool, SWAT, for automated web application testing using Search [20] mentions web application testing issues and none applies Based Software Testing (SBST). The algorithms significantly search based test data generation to automate web application enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of traditional search based techniques exploiting both static and dynamic analysis. The testing. combined approach yields a 54% increase in branch coverage and Popular web development languages such as PHP and a 30% reduction in test effort. Each improvement is separately Python have characteristics that pose a challenge when ap- evaluated in an empirical study on 6 real world web applications. plying search based techniques such as dynamic typing and identifying the input vector. Moreover, the unique and rich Index Terms—SBSE; Automated Test data generation; Web nature of a web application’s output can be exploited to aid applications the test generation process and potentially improve effective- ness and efficiency. This was the motivation for our work: We seek to develop a search based approach to automated I. INTRODUCTION web application testing that overcomes challenges and takes advantage of opportunities that web applications offer. The importance of automated web application testing de- rives from the increasing reliance on these systems for busi- In this paper we introduce an automated search based ness, social, organizational and governmental functions. -
Web Gui Testing Checklist
Web Gui Testing Checklist Wes recrystallizing her quinone congruously, phytophagous and sulphonic. How imponderable is Schroeder when barbate whileand soft-footed Brewer gliff Zachery some incisure yakety-yak affluently. some chatoyancy? Fulgurating and battiest Nealson blossoms her amontillados refine Wbox aims to the field to be able to the automated support data, testing web gui checklist Planned testing techniques, including scripted testing, exploratory testing, and user experience testing. This gui content will the css or dynamic values? Test all input fields for special characters. For instance, create test data assist the maximum and minimum values in those data field. Assisted by timing testing is not tested to the order to achieve true black art relying on gui testing web checklist will best. The web hosting environments you start all web testing gui checklist can provide tests has had made. The gui testing procedures are the weak factors causing delays in agile here offering, gui testing web? At anytime without giving us a testing web gui checklist can also has on. How gui testing checklist for a gui testing web checklist to induce further eliminating redundant if there is transmitted without the below to use of jobs with. Monkey testing tool that an application or even perform testing web gui changes some test android scripts behind successful only allows an. Discusses the preceding css or if a sql injections through an application penetration testing on gui testing web? How much regression testing is enough? Fully automated attack simulations and highly automated fuzzing tests are appropriate here, and testers might also use domain testing to pursue intuitions. -
Get Started with Corticon.Js
Get Started with Corticon.js Copyright © 2020 Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates. All rights reserved. ® These materials and all Progress software products are copyrighted and all rights are reserved by Progress Software Corporation. The information in these materials is subject to change without notice, and Progress Software Corporation assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear therein. The references in these materials to specific platforms supported are subject to change. Corticon, DataDirect (and design), DataDirect Cloud, DataDirect Connect, DataDirect Connect64, DataDirect XML Converters, DataDirect XQuery, DataRPM, Defrag This, Deliver More Than Expected, Icenium, Ipswitch, iMacros, Kendo UI, Kinvey, MessageWay, MOVEit, NativeChat, NativeScript, OpenEdge, Powered by Progress, Progress, Progress Software Developers Network, SequeLink, Sitefinity (and Design), Sitefinity, SpeedScript, Stylus Studio, TeamPulse, Telerik, Telerik (and Design), Test Studio, WebSpeed, WhatsConfigured, WhatsConnected, WhatsUp, and WS_FTP are registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation or one of its affiliates or subsidiaries in the U.S. and/or other countries. Analytics360, AppServer, BusinessEdge, DataDirect Autonomous REST Connector, DataDirect Spy, SupportLink, DevCraft, Fiddler, iMail, JustAssembly, JustDecompile, JustMock, NativeScript Sidekick, OpenAccess, ProDataSet, Progress Results, Progress Software, ProVision, PSE Pro, SmartBrowser, SmartComponent, SmartDataBrowser, SmartDataObjects, -
Test Automation in Web Environment
FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Test Automation in Web Environment Jorge Miguel Guerra Santos ForMestrado Jury Integrado em Engenharia Evaluation Informática e Computação Supervisor: Profa Ana Paiva Proponent: Engo Joel Campos June 27, 2016 Test Automation in Web Environment Jorge Miguel Guerra Santos Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Informática e Computação Approved in oral examination by the committee: Chair: External Examiner: Supervisor: June 27, 2016 Abstract In today’s fast moving world, it is a challenge for any company to continuously maintain and improve the quality and efficiency of software systems development. In many software projects, testing is neglected because of time or cost constraints. This leads to a lack of product quality, followed by customer dissatisfaction and ultimately to increased overall quality costs. Addition- ally, with the increasingly more complex software projects, the number of hours spent on testing increases as well, but without the support of suitable tools, the test efficiency and validity tends to decline. Some software testing tasks, such as extensive low-level interface regression testing, can be laborious and time consuming to do manually. In addition, a manual approach might not always be effective in finding certain classes of defects. Test automation offers a possibility to perform these types of testing effectively. Once automated tests have been developed, they can be run quickly and repeatedly. However, test automation systems usually lack reporting, analysis and meaningful information about project status. The end goal of this research work is to create a prototype that can create and organize test batteries by recording user interaction, reproduce the recorded actions automatically, detect failures during test execution and generate reports, while also setting up the test environment, all in a automatic fashion and develop techniques to create more maintainable test cases. -
A Systematic Review on Regression Testing for Web-Based Applications
Journal of Software A Systematic Review on Regression Testing for Web-Based Applications Anis Zarrad* Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +966114948531; email: [email protected] Manuscript submitted December 12, 2014; accepted April 16, 2015. doi: 10.17706/jsw.10.8.971-990 Abstract: Web-based applications and their underlying parts are growing rapidly to offer services over the internet around the world. Web applications play critical roles in various areas such as community development, business, academic, sciences etc. Therefore their correctness and reliability become important factors with each succeeding release. Regression testing is an important means to ensure such factors for every new released version. Regression testing is a verification process to discover the impact of changes in other interconnected modules. With the goal of selecting an appropriate regression testing approach to respond adequately to any changes in Web applications, we conduct a complete systematic study of regression testing techniques in Web applications. Out of 64, we identified a total of 22 papers reporting experiments and case studies. We present a qualitative analysis for used tools, an overview of test case section techniques and empirical study evaluation for every selected work. No approaches were found clearly superior to other since results depend on many varying factors and the deployment environments. We identified the need of evidences where approaches are evaluated cost effective rather than technical description. Key words: Regressing testing, web-based application testing, empirical study, test set, software testing. 1. Introduction In today’s scenario, as the world became global and with the advent of internet technologies, Web-based applications become more effective manner for enterprises, and academic entities to produce business strategies and policies. -
Integrated Testing Environment for Developers and Coding Testers
INTEGRATED TESTING ENVIRONMENT for Developers and Coding Testers Telerik www.telerik.com/test-studio www.twitter.com/teleriktesting Test Studio’s plugin for Visual Studio enables developers and testers comfortable writing code to work in the environment where they’re most productive. Write Code Where Needed Every test automation project will require some level of coding to be successful. Test Studio’s record and playback creates powerful, maintainable tests, but you’ll still need to write code at some point to cover common, critical aspects such as configuration, backing APIs, or test oracles. to ensure those APIs are properly tested elsewhere in the Setup and Teardown/ system, of course!) Using these APIs ensures our tests run Configuration faster, and we’re also keeping the overall test suite much more maintainable. Complex tests require clear, flexible configuration actions that keep the overall test suite maintainable over the long run. Pushing setup, teardown, and configuration to Configuration Actions code versus the system’s interface dramatically speeds up test execution by leveraging the system’s own internal Part of keeping your test suite lean and focused on high-value functionality through internal APIs, web service endpoints, tests is ensuring you’re not testing components which don’t or database stored procedures. make sense to test. Using coded steps to disable and re-enable these components during automated testing runs is a great Let’s have a look at some common scenarios where a team way to keep your tests smoother and targeted to functionality might drop to code to handle specific situations. your teams are writing. -
Computer Science) Thesis Title
MS (Computer Science) Thesis title: Formal Automated Testing of an Information Management System Submitted by: Rozina Kamil Roll no. 11 Reg. no: IU15M2LA011 Supervised by: Dr. Nadeem Akhtar i Title Formal Automated Testing of an Information Management System By Rozina Kamil Roll no. 11 Reg. no: IU15M2LA011 Thesis submitted for the partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In COMPUTER SCIENCE Department of Computer Science & IT The Islamic University of Bahawalpur - PAKISTAN Fall 2015-17 i DECLARATION Formal Automated Testing of an Information management System published source (except the references, standard mathematical or geometrical models/equations /formulae /protocols etc.). I further declare that this work has not been submitted for award of any other diploma/degree. The university may take action if information provided is found inaccurate at any stage. (In case of default, the scholar will be proceeded against as per HEC plagiarism policy). Rozina Kamil Roll no. 11 Reg no. IU15M2LA011 ii To, The Controller of Examinations The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan We, the supervisory committee, certify that the contents and format of thesis titled Formal Automated testing of an information management system submitted by Rozina Kamil, Roll no. 11, and Registration no. IU15M2LA011 have been found satisfactory and recommend that it be processed for evaluation by the External Examiner(s) for the award of degree. Supervisor Dr. Nadeem Akhtar Department of Computer Science & IT The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan iii Dedication I dedicate my dissertation work to my all family members, friends, class mates and my supervisor. It cannot be possible for their sincere support and encourage. -
Guide to Test Automation Tools 2017 - 2018
Guide to Test Automation Tools 2017 - 2018 WHITEPAPER QATestlab 2017 Copyright 2017 ©QATestLab. All Rights Reserved Table of Contents Summary 3 Introduction 3 1. Test Automation Tools. Market review 1.1. Selenium WebDriver Framework 4 1.2. Appium Framework 5 1.3. Robotium Framework 7 1.4. Serenity Framework 9 1.5. Robot Framework 10 1.6. Galen Framework 12 1.7. HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT) 14 1.8. Ranorex Studio 16 1.9. TestComplete 19 1.10. Telerik Test Studio 20 1.11. Applitools Eyes 22 1.12. Test Automation Tools and Frameworks: Comparison of 23 Technical Aspects 2. Test Automation Tools Approved by QATestLab 2.1. Selenium WebDriver 26 2.2. Appium 28 2.3. TestComplete 29 2.4. Ranorex Studio 31 3. Summary 32 Contact Information 33 2 Copyright 2017 ©QATestLab. All Rights Reserved Summary Table of Contents Click the section to jump This whitepaper aims at providing the comprehensive data on the most ahead popular test automation tools in 2017 - 2018 including the description of Summary their parameters which can be considered when selecting a tool / framework for test automation. The document also provides the Introduction comparison of the leading test automation tools highlighting both 1. Test Automation advantages and disadvantages, and also main objectives, technical Tools. Market review characteristics and the information about a provider. 1.1. Selenium WebDriver Framework The whitepaper is aimed to assist in selecting a proper test automation 1.2 Appium Framework tool avoiding time and money losses. Besides, it includes the 1.3 Robotium recommendations on the most effective test automation tools, Framework 1.4 Serenity Framework information about their effectiveness and maintainability, which were 1.5 Robot Framework prepared by QATestLab on the ground of successful execution of 50 test 1.6 Galen Framework automation projects. -
Corticon.Js Integration
Corticon.js Integration Copyright © 2021 Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates. All rights reserved. ® These materials and all Progress software products are copyrighted and all rights are reserved by Progress Software Corporation. The information in these materials is subject to change without notice, and Progress Software Corporation assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear therein. The references in these materials to specific platforms supported are subject to change. DataDirect Cloud, DataDirect Connect, DataDirect Connect64, DataDirect XML Converters, DataDirect XQuery, DataRPM, Defrag This, Deliver More Than Expected, DevReach (and design), Icenium, Inspec, Ipswitch, iMacros, Kendo UI, Kinvey, MessageWay, MOVEit, NativeChat, NativeScript, OpenEdge, Powered by Chef, Powered by Progress, Progress, Progress Software Developers Network, SequeLink, Sitefinity (and Design), Sitefinity, Sitefinity (and design), SpeedScript, Stylus Studio, Stylized Design (Arrow/3D Box logo), Styleized Design (C Chef logo), Stylized Design of Samurai, TeamPulse, Telerik, Telerik (and design), Test Studio, WebSpeed, WhatsConfigured, WhatsConnected, WhatsUp, and WS_FTP are registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation or one of its affiliates or subsidiaries in the U.S. and/or other countries. Analytics360, AppServer, BusinessEdge, Chef Automate, Chef Compliance, Chef Desktop, Chef Habitat, Chef WorkStation, Corticon.js, Corticon Rules, Data Access, DataDirect Autonomous REST Connector, DataDirect Spy, -
Understanding How Test Studio Differs from Visual Studio 2010
Understanding how Test Studio differs from Visual Studio 2010 This page is designed to help clarify the way Telerik Test Studio goes beyond Visual Studio 2010 testing products (Visual Studio Test Premium 2010 and Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate) to offer richer user experience and enhanced productivity. Its purpose is also to help visitors understand the key challenges with test automation that we are trying to solve with our solution beyond just the “Hello World” test case. With the release of Visual Studio 2010, Microsoft has introduced the capability to automate the user interface (UI) of applications on the Windows platform. Visual Studio 2010 introduces the CodedUI test framework and the MTM (Microsoft Test Manager) as solutions for Testers and QAs to help manage test creation and test automation. We believe this to be a great step forward and a win for our customers especially in the areas of Test and Lab management. The Visual Studio / .NET platform has traditionally been exclusive to developers but now with VS2010 it also encompass- es testers and QA professionals. Quick Facts Sheet: Benefits Test Studio Visual Studio 2010 Level of complexity Technical & Non-Technical Development skills required Point-and-click UI Yes Limited Easy to Maintain Tests Yes No Silverlight automation Yes Yes, only for Silverlight 4 Test step keyword view Yes No Browser support IE, FF, Safari, Chrome IE, FF Native support for Telerik controls for Yes No AJAX and Silverlight Web-specific testing features Yes Yes Integrates with VS Professional and Visual Studio Ultimate / Licensing model above Premium Edition license Major product updates 3 times a year Unknown Premier Support (response within 24 Yes No hours) Contents The Specialized vs.