DOCSLIB.ORG

The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D LICENSED FOR INDIVIDUAL USE ONLY The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 The 13 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up by John R. Rymer and Rob Koplowitz March 13, 2019 Why Read This Report Key Takeaways Our 28-criterion evaluation of low-code Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix, Kony, And development platforms for application Salesforce Are Leaders development and delivery (AD&D) professionals Forrester’s research reveals a market in which assesses the 13 most significant suppliers — Microsoft, longtime rivals OutSystems and Clear Software, GeneXus, Kony, MatsSoft, Mendix, Kony, and Salesforce are Leaders; Mendix, Microsoft, OutSystems, Progress ServiceNow, GeneXus, and Progress Software are Software, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Skuid, Strong Performers; MatsSoft, WaveMaker, and Thinkwise, and WaveMaker. This report shows Thinkwise are Contenders; and Skuid and Clear how each provider measures up and helps AD&D Software are Challengers. pros select the right one for their needs. Features For Digital-Business Use Cases Set Apart The Leaders Development services for basic web and mobile applications, including standards for integration, basic data management and mapping, workflow, development process support, and application and identity administration, are table stakes. The leading vendors have also moved into business process automation, real-time applications, and AI services, as well as large, mission-critical apps. This PDF is only licensed for individual use when downloaded from forrester.com or reprints.forrester.com. All other distribution prohibited. FORRESTER.COM FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 The 13 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up by John R. Rymer and Rob Koplowitz with Christopher Mines, Sara Sjoblom, and Christine Turley March 13, 2019 Table Of Contents Related Research Documents 2 Low-Code For AD&D Professionals Vendors The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Expand Enterprise Value Platforms For AD&D Pros, Q4 2017 2 Evaluation Summary Now Tech: Rapid App Delivery, Q1 2019 5 Vendor Offerings The State Of Low-Code Platform Adoption, 2018 Vendor Profiles Leaders Strong Performers Share reports with colleagues. Enhance your membership with Contenders Research Share. Challengers 11 Evaluation Overview Vendor Inclusion Criteria 13 Supplemental Material Forrester Research, Inc., 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA +1 617-613-6000 | Fax: +1 617-613-5000 | forrester.com © 2019 Forrester Research, Inc. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®, Technographics®, Forrester Wave, TechRadar, and Total Economic Impact are trademarks of Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law. [email protected] or +1 866-367-7378 FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS March 13, 2019 The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 The 13 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up Low-Code For AD&D Professionals Vendors Expand Enterprise Value Enterprise development teams are adopting low-code development platforms, and the market’s growth prospects appear rosy. In our survey of global developers, 23% reported using low-code platforms in 2018, and another 22% planned to do so within a year.1 Digital businesses’ demand for ever more software ever more quickly is the big driver of adoption. But our assessment of 13 leading platforms also reveals vendors removing previous limitations on low-code adoption — even by supporting coding. Vendors in this segment now: › Provide solid features for common use cases; differentiated vendors add depth. Tools and features to deliver web and mobile user experiences, including sophisticated forms, page navigation, and single-page apps, are now common across most of these vendors. So too are basic data management and reporting, workflow automation, and collaboration tools and features. Differentiated products include tools for pixel-perfect native mobile apps, natural language processing, event-management applications, and apps incorporating machine learning and case and content management. › Power projects with integral coding, as well as business expert participation. Some vendors allow developers to work in either code or declarative tools — their choice. Embedded integrated development environments and code editors free developers to build features outside of the low- code platform’s framework but manage that code within projects. “Code behind” approaches allow developers to swap back and forth between graphical and coding views of their apps. Several of the vendors added tools designed for business experts, which allow them to contribute to development projects. Contributions range from screen and workflow prototypes to sections of projects. › Automate governance and production management. Leading vendors are also adding features for enterprise AD&D teams to govern development processes and application change in large app and service portfolios, as well as provide data loading and synchronization in production apps and automated error reporting and handling. Evaluation Summary The Forrester Wave™ evaluation highlights Leaders, Strong Performers, Contenders, and Challengers within a market. It’s an assessment of the top vendors in the market and does not represent the entire vendor landscape. You’ll find more information about this market in our reports on low-code development and digital process automation platforms.2 This evaluation is a starting point only. View the details of our assessments in the accompanying Excel- based tool, and create custom weightings to reflect your organization’s priorities and critical needs (see Figure 1 and see Figure 2). Click the link at the beginning of this report on Forrester.com to download the tool. © 2019 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law. 2 [email protected] or +1 866-367-7378 FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS March 13, 2019 The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 The 13 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up FIGURE 1 Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals Q1 2019 Strong Challengers Contenders Performers Leaders Stronger OutSystems current offering Mendix Kony Microsoft ServiceNow Salesforce Progress Software GeneXus WaveMaker MatsSoft Thinkwise Skuid Clear Software Weaker current offering Weaker strategy Stronger strategy Market presence © 2019 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law. 3 [email protected] or +1 866-367-7378 FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS March 13, 2019 The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 The 13 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up FIGURE 2 Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D Professionals Scorecard, Q1 2019 re s ester’ osoft Forr weighting Clear SoftwaGeneXus Kony MatsSoft Mendix Micr OutSystems Current offering 50% 0.84 3.18 4.10 2.54 4.49 3.95 4.58 Tooling for application development 33% 1.54 3.34 3.90 2.82 4.28 4.26 4.14 Tooling for platform and app admin 33% 0.60 3.00 4.60 2.60 5.00 3.80 5.00 App deployment, ops tools, and 34% 0.40 3.20 3.80 2.20 4.20 3.80 4.60 features Strategy 50% 1.75 3.00 3.50 2.25 3.50 4.50 3.50 Vision and strategy 25% 1.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Training, community, and marketplace 25% 3.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 Partners 25% 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 Commercial model 25% 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Market presence 0% 2.32 2.69 2.34 1.67 3.33 4.67 2.67 Revenue from low-code platform sales 33% 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 Revenue growth rate 33% 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 2.00 Number of enterprise customers 34% 1.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 © 2019 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law. 4 [email protected] or +1 866-367-7378 FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY PROFESSIONALS March 13, 2019 The Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms For AD&D Professionals, Q1 2019 The 13 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up FIGURE 2 Forrester Wave™: Low-Code Development Platforms for AD&D Professionals Scorecard, Q1 2019 (Cont.) e s ce ess Softwar ester’ ogr Forr weighting Pr Salesfor ServiceNowSkuid ThinkwiseWaveMaker Current offering 50% 3.02 3.48 3.24 1.31 2.12 2.65 Tooling for application development 33% 3.06 4.06 3.34 2.16 1.98 2.16 Tooling for platform and app admin 33% 3.00 3.80 3.40 1.20 3.40 3.20 App deployment, ops tools, and 34% 3.00 2.60 3.00 0.60 1.00 2.60 features Strategy 50% 2.50 4.00 3.00 1.75 2.25 2.00 Vision and strategy 25% 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Training, community, and marketplace 25% 1.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Partners 25% 3.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 Commercial model 25% 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 Market presence 0% 2.34 4.01 4.00 2.33 1.00 2.66 Revenue from low-code platform sales 33% 3.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Revenue growth rate 33% 1.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 Number of enterprise customers 34% 3.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 Vendor Offerings Forrester included 13 vendors in this assessment: Clear Software, GeneXus, Kony, MatsSoft, Mendix, Microsoft, OutSystems, Progress Software, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Skuid, Thinkwise, and WaveMaker (see Figure 3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WEIYANG (STEPHEN) YUAN [email protected] | Chicago | 608-504-0649 | Stephenyuan.Urspace.Io Education University of Wisconsin-Madison B.S
    WEIYANG (STEPHEN) YUAN [email protected] | Chicago | 608-504-0649 | stephenyuan.urspace.io Education University of Wisconsin-Madison B.S. in Computer Engineering May 2020 ● GPA: 3.83/4.0 ​ ● Related Coursework: Operating Systems • A​ rtificial Intelligence • Computer Networks and Communication • Databases • Information Security • Big Data Systems • Android Mobile Development Skills ● Programming Languages: Java • Golang • C++ • Scala • MATLAB • SQL • Julia • C • Python ​ ● Technologies: Git, Linux, Java Spring, Amazon Web Services (AWS), MongoDB, Postgres, React, Node.js, Docker, Jenkins, ​ Play Framework, Hadoop, Spark, Wireshark, Visual Studio Experience Enfusion, Chicago Java Software Developer July 2020 - Current ● Develop the portfolio management software system used by over 500 clients that supports a variety of financial calculation and valuation over 20 financial derivatives as well as back office general ledger and cash flow with more than 10,000 daily positions on average ● Take responsibility in the whole development lifecycle from designing (10%), implementing (40%), running regression & unit testing (40%) to supporting internal and production issues (10%) ● Apply experience of Object-Oriented design patterns and best practices to creating a robust and reliable infrastructure for the system with knowledge of Java SE, Hibernate, JMS, JVM and MySQL and deliver constant results in weekly production ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ release ● Automate development and testing frameworks by writing python and shell scripts to improve overall
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence
    TechnoVision The Impact of AI 20 18 CONTENTS Foreword 3 Introduction 4 TechnoVision 2018 and Artificial Intelligence 5 Overview of TechnoVision 2018 14 Design for Digital 17 Invisible Infostructure 26 Applications Unleashed 33 Thriving on Data 40 Process on the Fly 47 You Experience 54 We Collaborate 61 Applying TechnoVision 68 Conclusion 77 2 TechnoVision 2018 The Impact of AI FOREWORD We introduce TechnoVision 2018, now in its eleventh year, with pride in reaching a second decade of providing a proven and relevant source of technology guidance and thought leadership to help enterprises navigate the compelling and yet complex opportunities for business. The longevity of this publication has been achieved through the insight of our colleagues, clients, and partners in applying TechnoVision as a technology guide and coupling that insight with the expert input of our authors and contributors who are highly engaged in monitoring and synthesizing the shift and emergence of technologies and the impact they have on enterprises globally. In this edition, we continue to build on the We believe that with TechnoVision 2018, you can framework that TechnoVision has established further crystalize your plans and bet on the right for several years with updates on last years’ technology disruptions, to continue to map and content, reflecting new insights, use cases, and traverse a successful digital journey. A journey technology solutions. which is not about a single destination, but rather a single mission to thrive in the digital epoch The featured main theme for TechnoVision 2018 through agile cycles of transformation delivering is AI, due to breakthroughs burgeoning the business outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for CLOUD and AS-A-SERVICE PROCUREMENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction
    BEST PRACTICE GUIDE FOR CLOUD AND AS-A-SERVICE PROCUREMENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction Specific Models and Understanding Cloud Procurement Service Models Data EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Breach Notification Personnel Security While private companies rapidly move systems and Vendors share blame, too. Lots of cloud providers are new to Encryption applications to the cloud, public agencies still struggle to adopt public sector business, having grown up selling to consumers Audits Operations hosted services that could save money and provide better value. and private firms. These companies don’t always understand Hybrid Cloud Environments legitimate demands that make government contracting Preparation for Migrating Yet states and localities have much to gain from the different from selling to other markets. Failure to accommodate Workloads to the Cloud technology industry’s “as-a-service” revolution. Many unique government requirements can be a deal-breaker for jurisdictions face huge legacy system replacement challenges. agencies charged with protecting the public’s interests. Conclusion They’re also under pressure to provide new classes of digital services. The cloud can offer a better path toward All too often, government and industry aren’t on the same page Workgroup Members modernization — there’s no hardware to buy, you’re always when it comes to cloud services. They may not even speak the and Contributors on the latest version of the software and system capacity same language. can be adjusted almost instantly based on your needs. Appendix 1 Bridging the Gap Model Terms and Conditions Templates So why is government lagging behind? The fact is that These pressures led us to release the first version of this guide Software-as-a-Service governments often struggle to buy cloud-based services because two years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Google Is a Strong Performer in Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms Excerpted from the Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms, Q4 2014 by John R
    FOR CIOS DECEMBER 29, 2014 Google Is A Strong Performer In Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms Excerpted From The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms, Q4 2014 by John R. Rymer and James Staten with Peter Burris, Christopher Mines, and Dominique Whittaker GOOGLE, NOW A FULL-SERVICE PLATFORM, IS RUNNING TO CATCH THE LEADERS Since our last analysis, Google has made significant improvements to its cloud platform — adding an IaaS service, innovated with new big data solutions (based on its homegrown dremel architecture), and added partners. Google is popular among web developers — we estimate that it has between 10,000 and 99,000 customers. But Google Cloud Platform lacks several key certifications, monitoring and security controls, and application services important to CIOs and provided by AWS and Microsoft.1 Google has also been slow to position its cloud platform as the home for applications that want to leverage the broad set of Google services such as Android, AdSense, Search, Maps, and so many other technologies. Look for that to be a key focus in 2015, and for a faster cadence of new features. Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms For CIOs, Q4 ‘14 Platforms For Rapid Developers, Q4 ‘14 Risky Strong Risky Strong Bets Contenders Performers Leaders Bets Contenders Performers Leaders Strong Strong Amazon Web Services MIOsoft Microsoft Salesforce Cordys* Mendix MIOsoft Salesforce (Q2 2013) OutSystems OutSystems Google Mendix Acquia Current Rackspace* IBM Current offering (Q2 2013) offering Cordys* (Q2 2013) Engine Yard Acquia CenturyLink Google, with a Forrester score of 2.35, is a Strong Performer in this Dimension Data GoGrid Forrester Wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Q& a – Wavemaker Demo/Training Webinar – March 15, 2016
    Q& A – WaveMaker Demo/Training Webinar – March 15, 2016 Q: Is there a workflow engine ie BPMN v2 A: WaveMaker has strong integrations with APIs, web services and SDKs. You can integrate with rules engine platforms like JBPM and Drools using their Java SDKs (jars) or through their ReST APIs. You need to do this only if the workflow requires very complex workflows. Otherwise, the native capabilities of the WaveMaker should be enough to take care of your app requirements. Q: on oracle db's there are schemas, which should be considered...what is important to consider regarding to that (schema)? do I have to import the tables over each schema or is there a way how to import the whole tables (over all schemas)...? A: WaveMaker allows you to import tables from multiple schemas. See the image below. This is the second step of importing an Oracle DB. [Steps: Import > Database > Select Oracle > ….] Q: Can we provide read only access to a user group? A: For instance if you are dealing with an editable grid, which has an add/save button, all you to do is to hide the button for users with a specific role. If you are dealing with a specific widget then you can use the conditional read-only option as shown below. Here you need to write a one-line javascript as shown below, where the users with the role “rolename” will be presented a read-only birthdate. Q: Can we integrate the application for SSO ? A: You can configure SSO easily through the following approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Datacross – Software- and System Information
    o Konformität mit geltendem Recht o Umsetzung der DIN EN 50581/63000 o Beurteilung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit o Lieferantenkommunikation o Beurteilung/Reduzieren von Risiken DataCross – Software- and System Information Mansystems – the software house „inside“ DataCross – platform concept tec4U-Solutions GmbH DataCross is provided as a SaaS (software as a service) Mansystems Deutschland GmbH, acting as a software solution on a Mendix development PaaS (platform as a ser- house „inside“ tec4U-Solutions, performs the following vice). This is the platform on which the required business tasks in the DataCross project partnership: services, platform services and data & storage are realized along with other services. This platform can be hosted in all ► Implementation of technical software specifi cations for popular clouds as IaaS (infrastructure as a service), inclu- the DataCross application ding the amazon cloud, Azure Cloud or also SAP Cloud, for ► Ensuring DataCross software operation example. ► Technical support for DataCross As a medium-sized software company with more than 140 staff and 27 years of experience, Mansystems is globally engaged with own locations largely situated in Europe, in the Netherlands, Germany, Slovenia and Poland. Mansystems not only understands itself as a partner and More information: „center of excellence“ for individual software solutions in https://docs.mendix.com/developerportal/ DataCross. Special focus areas for this are the digitalization https://docs.mendix.com/deployment/ of products and processes, and realization of new business models – i.e. provision of business applications in the cloud. https://docs.mendix.com/developerportal/general/mendix- Mansystems also off ers customized integration solutions for cloud-status connection to third-party systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Software As a Service
    Software as a Service Haojie Hang Ogheneovo Dibie Executive Summary • In this presentation, we go through the Software as a Service Methodology, examine its benefits and drawbacks and talk about two state-of-art SaaS systems– Amazon Web Service and Google App Engine • We also look into Service Oriented Architecture powering SaaS applications and its impact on modern web 2.0 applications • Finally, we examine hybrids of traditional and SaaS applications Overview • What is Software as a Service (SaaS) • Background o Brief history o Concept o Big picture o Related terms • Computing Today o SasS is everywhere o The SaaS Market • Benefits of SaaS • Drawbacks of SaaS o Robustness o Privacy o Security o Reliability • Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) o Guiding principles of SOA • Case studies o Amazon Web Services (AWS) o Google App Engine • Influence of SOA on Web 2.0 development o Zend Framework • Hybrids of Traditional and SaaS applications o Dropbox o Microsoft Office • Summary • References What is SaaS? • Definition: Software as a Service (SaaS), a.k.a. on- demand software, is a software delivery model in which software and its associated data are hosted centrally and accessed using a thin-client, usually a web browser over the internet. – Wikipedia • Simply put, SaaS is a method for delivering software that provides remote access to software as a web- based service. The software service can be purchased with a monthly fee and pay as you go. What is SaaS? • Where does the term SaaS come from? o The SAAS acronym allegedly first appeared
    [Show full text]
  • Salesforce Heroku Enterprise: a Cloud Security Overview June 2016
    Salesforce Heroku Enterprise: A Cloud Security Overview June 2016 1 Contents INTRODUCTION 3 CASESTUDY:GLIBC 19 Heroku behind the Curtain: Patching SALESFORCETRUSTMODEL 4 the glibc Security Hole What Do We Do When a Security CLOUD COMPUTING AND Vulnerability Lands? THESHAREDSECURITYMODEL 5 Provider Responsibilities How Do We Do This with Minimum Downtime? Tenant Responsibilities What about Data? INFRASTRUCTURE AND What about Heroku Itself? APPLICATIONSECURITY 8 Keep Calm, Carry On Server Hardening Customer Applications BUSINESSCONTINUITY 23 Heroku Platform: High Availability Container Hardening and Disaster Recovery Application Security Customer Applications Heroku Flow Postgres Databases Identity and Access Management Customer Configuration and Identity Federation via Single Sign-On Meta-Information Organizations, Roles, and Permissions Service Resiliency and Availability Business Continuity and Emergency NETWORKSECURITY 14 Preparedness Secure Network Architecture Secure Access Points INCIDENTRESPONSE 27 Data in Motion ELEMENTSMARKETPLACE 28 Private Spaces App Permissions Building Secure Applications with Add-Ons DATASECURITY 16 Heroku Postgres PHYSICALSECURITY 29 Encryption Data Center Access Customer Data Retention and Destruction Environmental Controls Management SECURITYMONITORING 17 Storage Device Decommissioning Logging and Network Monitoring DDoS COMPLIANCEANDAUDIT 31 Man in the Middle and IP Spoofing SUMMARY 33 Patch Management HEROKU ENTERPRISE SECURITY WHITE PAPER 2 Introduction eroku Enterprise, a key component of the Salesforce Platform, is a cloud application platform used by organizations of all sizes to deploy and operate applications throughout Hthe world. The Heroku platform is one of the first cloud application platforms delivered entirely as a service, allowing organizations to focus on application development and business strategy while Salesforce and the Heroku division of Salesforce focus on infrastructure management, scaling, and security.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Computing: a Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-Level Offerings David Hilley College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology
    Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-level Offerings David Hilley College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology April 2009 Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-level Offerings David Hilley 1 Introduction Cloud computing is a buzzword and umbrella term applied to several nascent trends in the turbulent landscape of information technology. Computing in the “cloud” alludes to ubiquitous and inexhaustible on-demand IT resources accessible through the Internet. Practically every new Internet-based service from Gmail [1] to Amazon Web Services [2] to Microsoft Online Services [3] to even Facebook [4] have been labeled “cloud” offerings, either officially or externally. Although cloud computing has garnered significant interest, factors such as unclear terminology, non-existent product “paper launches”, and opportunistic marketing have led to a significant lack of clarity surrounding discussions of cloud computing technology and products. The need for clarity is well-recognized within the industry [5] and by industry observers [6]. Perhaps more importantly, due to the relative infancy of the industry, currently-available product offerings are not standardized. Neither providers nor potential consumers really know what a “good” cloud computing product offering should look like and what classes of products are appropriate. Consequently, products are not easily comparable. The scope of various product offerings differ and overlap in complicated ways – for example, Ama- zon’s EC2 service [7] and Google’s App Engine [8] partially overlap in scope and applicability. EC2 is more flexible but also lower-level, while App Engine subsumes some functionality in Amazon Web Services suite of offerings [2] external to EC2.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating App Delivery
    Accelerating App Delivery How aPaaS Enables Fast Delivery & Continuous Innovation Issue 1 2 Welcome 2 Resources 3 From the Gartner Files: Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Application Platform as a Service, Worldwide 32 About Mendix Featuring research from 2 Welcome Innovate or perish. That’s the reality facing every business, regardless of industry. The need to deliver modern, multi-channel applications that engage customers and empower employees has never been more urgent. Yet, fast-growing project backlogs and unhappy business sponsors are clear indications that traditional development approaches aren’t cutting it. Enterprise application Platform-as-a-Service (aPaaS) offers a much-needed way forward, promising to accelerate your application delivery cadence and capacity. But the market is crowded, and not all aPaaS offerings are created equal. In Gartner’s 2015 Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Application Platform as Service (aPaaS), Mendix was positioned as a “Visionary” due to its completeness of vision and ability to execute. Use this complimentary Gartner report to better understand and navigate the aPaaS landscape and ultimately select the platform best suited to your organization’s priorities. Resources In addition to Gartner’s perspective, we have [Video] aPaaS Success Stories included four resources to illustrate how Mendix See how Mendix customers, such as Dun & supports customers through their digital journeys, Bradstreet, LV= Insurance, The Boston Globe empowering them to deliver the right apps with and Kao, are rapidly delivering custom apps that unprecedented speed. differentiate their business. Watch video → Successful App Delivery for the Digital Age Find out how to keep your IT team on track and [Video] The Mendix App Platform Tour quickly deliver the multi-channel, multi-device Take a two-minute tour of the Mendix App apps needed to digitize your business.
    [Show full text]
  • Openstack: the Path to Cloud
    OpenStack: The Path to Cloud Considerations and recommendations for businesses adopting cloud technology openstack.org Table of Contents Executive Overview 1 Enterprise Cloud Strategy 2 Approaches to an OpenStack Private Cloud 5 Forming the OpenStack Team 9 Organization and Process Considerations 13 Choosing Workloads for Your Cloud 16 Implementation Phases 22 Post-deployment 30 Summary 32 References 33 Glossary 34 *Underlined gray bold words and concepts are defined in the Glossary at the end. CONTRIBUTORS Carol Barrett, Cloud Software Planner, Intel Corporation Tyler Britten, Technical Advocate, Blue Box, an IBM company Kathy Cacciatore, Consulting Marketing Manager, OpenStack Foundation Pete Chadwick, Senior Product Manager, SUSE Paula Phipps, Senior Manager, Infrastructure Software Marketing, Hitachi Data Systems Gerd Prüßmann, Director Cloud Solutions, Mirantis Megan Rossetti, Cloud Infrastructure Operations, Walmart Yih Leong Sun, PhD, Senior Software Cloud Architect, Intel Corporation Shamail Tahir, Offering Manager, IBM Heidi Joy Tretheway, Senior Marketing Manager, OpenStack Foundation Susan Wu, Director of Technical Marketing, Midokura Executive Overview This book is written to help enterprise architects implement an OpenStack® cloud. With architects with one foot in information technology and the other in business operations in mind, we want to offer insights and best practices to help you achieve multiple (and sometimes competing) goals. If you’re looking for vendor-neutral answers about planning your path to an OpenStack cloud, you’re in the right place. Members of the OpenStack community—technologists, business leaders and product managers—collaborated on this book to explain how to get started with an OpenStack cloud. We’ve included pros and cons to help you make better choices when setting up your cloud, along with anticipated investments of both time and money.
    [Show full text]
  • Outsystems Platform and Force.Com Different Paas for Different Players
    InComparison OutSystems Platform and Force.com different PaaS for different players An InComparison Paper by Bloor Research Author : David Norfolk Publish date : October 2013 Using cloud doesn’t necessarily (and shouldn’t) mean giving up control of your data and processing David Norfolk OutSystems Platform and Force.com different PaaS for different players Executive summary This paper is about two different PaaS— ethos for end user computing. This is what Platform as a Service—solutions. In the PaaS could make Force.com popular—it’s busi- model, the cloud service customer creates the ness-oriented and Force developers should software it needs using tools and/or libraries not need to bother about performance, avail- from the PaaS provider. The customer also ability, security etc., all of which are supplied controls software deployment and configura- by the platform (although the effectiveness of tion settings; whereas the PaaS provider looks this probably shouldn’t be taken for granted). after the provision of the networks, servers, Adopting a single platform (basically, Sales- storage, and other services that support force.com) with a lot of pre-written and the software. Analysts such as Gartner are market-tested apps, and the choice of predicting a sharp rise in PaaS adoption, now writing your own apps with Force.com only if that people are more used to using cloud you really have to, is very attractive to large services and PaaS isn’t only available from organisations with a lot of sometimes over- risky start-ups. lapping, usually very expensive, point solu- tions to manage. One platform with the data OutSystems is a well-established supplier shared between apps should be a lot more of high-productivity in-house programming cost-effective.
    [Show full text]