About RADIUS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EAP-TLS Authentication with an NPS RADIUS Server
EAP-TLS Authentication with an NPS RADIUS Server 802.1X/EAP-TLS (Extensible Authentication Protocol-Transport Layer Security), defined in RFC 5216, provides secure authentication methods. Client devices (RADIUS supplicants) and a RADIUS authentication server verify each other's identity by validating the signature on the computer and server certificates that they send one another. This authentication method uses an infrastructure that includes a RADIUS authentication server that communicates with an external LDAP database. It also needs a mechanism for installing certificates on the server and all the supplicants, which you can do with a Windows NPS (Network Policy Server) using a GPO (Group Policy Object) to distribute computer certificates and an 802.1X SSID client configuration for wireless access. You can also employ the same infrastructure to authenticate users (also referred to as RADIUS supplicants) who submit user names and passwords to the authentication server. This document explains how to set up the following components to provide wireless client and user authentication through 802.1X/EAP-TLS: • (Aerohive) An 802.1X SSID that instructs APs (RADIUS authenticators) to forward authentication requests to an NPS RADIUS server • (Windows) An NPS RADIUS server that accepts authentication requests from the APs and EAP-TLS authentication requests from clients • (Windows) A GPO to deploy computer certificates and a wireless network configuration to clients • (Aerohive and Windows – optional) An Aerohive and NPS configuration in which different RADIUS attributes are returned based on authentication method (EAP-TLS or PEAP-MS-CHAPv2 in this example) assigning one user profile to clients authenticating by certificate and another to users authenticating by user name/password. -
Application Notes for Avaya IP Office Telephony Infrastructure in A
Avaya Solution & Interoperability Test Lab Application Notes for Avaya IP Office Telephony Infrastructure in a Converged VoIP and Data Network using Hewlett Packard Networking Switches configured with 802.1X Authentication - Issue 1.0 Abstract The IEEE 802.1X standard defines a client-server based network access control (NAC) and authentication protocol that restricts unauthorized clients from connecting to a Local Area Network (LAN) through publicly accessible ports. 802.1X provides a means of authenticating and authorizing users attached to a LAN port and of preventing access to that port in cases where the authentication process fails. Hewlett Packard (HP) Networking switches support 802.1X as authenticators and Avaya IP Telephones support 802.1X as supplicants. These Application Notes provides the steps necessary to configure 802.1X on the HP Networking switches for an Avaya IP Telephone with an attached PC. Linux FreeRADIUS is used as the authentication server. Information in these Application Notes has been obtained through DevConnect compliance testing and additional technical discussions. Testing was conducted via the DevConnect Program at the Avaya Solution and Interoperability Test Lab. RDC; Reviewed: Solution & Interoperability Test Lab Application Notes 1 of 21 SPOC 10/18/2012 ©2012 Avaya Inc. All Rights Reserved. HP_IPO80_8021X 1. Introduction The 802.1X protocol is an IEEE standard for media-level network access control (NAC), offering the capability to permit or deny network connectivity, control LAN access, and apply traffic policy, based on user or machine identity. 802.1X consists of three components (or entities): Supplicant – a port access entity (PAE) that requests access to the network. -
Utility-Grade Core Network Services
WHITEPAPER Utility-Grade Core Network Services The infoblox appliance-based platform integrates distributes, and manages DNS, DHCP, IPAM, TFTP, NTP and more to drive networks and applications Executive Summary Networks and applications have become highly dependent on a collection of essential core network services that are not always “visible” or on the forefront of IT project lists. For example, virtually all applications, including web, e-mail, ERP, CRM, and Microsoft’s Active Directory require the Domain Name System (DNS) for their basic operation. Most IP-based devices, including laptops and desktops, require Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) to obtain an IP address. Newer devices such as IP phones, RFID readers, and cameras that are network-connected require file transfer services (via TFTP or HTTP) to receive configuration information and firmware updates. If core network services are compromised, networks and applications fail. These failures often manifest themselves as “network” or “application” issues but are often caused by failure of the underlying core network services themselves. A majority of enterprises still use an “ad-hoc” collection of disparate systems to deploy core network services and are, therefore, experiencing growing problems with availability, security, audit-ability, and real-time data integration that threaten current and future applications. For more than a decade, the focus of networking professionals has been on physical network architectures with high levels of redundancy and fault-tolerance. From the endpoint inward, enterprise networks are designed to provide high availability with device redundancy and multiple paths among users and data. One of the key components of these architectures has been the network appliance, purpose-built devices that are designed to perform a specific function such as routing, switching, or gateway applications. -
7750 SR OS System Management Guide
7750 SR OS System Management Guide Software Version: 7750 SR OS 10.0 R4 July 2012 Document Part Number: 93-0071-09-02 *93-0071-09-02* This document is protected by copyright. Except as specifically permitted herein, no portion of the provided information can be reproduced in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from Alcatel-Lucent. Alcatel, Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent and the Alcatel-Lucent logo are trademarks of Alcatel-Lucent. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. The information presented is subject to change without notice. Alcatel-Lucent assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies contained herein. Copyright 2012 Alcatel-Lucent Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Preface. .13 Getting Started Alcatel-Lucent 7750 SR Router Configuration Process . .17 Security Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting . .20 Authentication . .21 Local Authentication . .22 RADIUS Authentication . .22 TACACS+ Authentication . .25 Authorization . .26 Local Authorization. .27 RADIUS Authorization . .27 TACACS+ Authorization. .27 Accounting. .28 RADIUS Accounting . .28 TACACS+ Accounting . .28 Security Controls . .30 When a Server Does Not Respond . .30 Access Request Flow . .31 CPU Protection . .32 CPU Protection Extensions ETH-CFM . .36 Vendor-Specific Attributes (VSAs) . .38 Other Security Features . .39 Secure Shell (SSH) . .39 Per Peer CPM Queuing. .41 Filters and Traffic Management. .42 TTL Security for BGP and LDP . .43 Exponential Login Backoff . .43 User Lockout . .45 Encryption . .46 802.1x Network Access Control . .46 TCP Enhanced Authentication Option. .46 Packet Formats . .48 Keychain. .49 Configuration Notes . .50 General . .50 Configuring Security with CLI . .51 Setting Up Security Attributes. .52 Configuring Authentication . .52 Configuring Authorization . -
Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) and IEEE 802.1X: Tutorial and Empirical Experience
CHEN LAYOUT 11/17/05 11:57 AM Page 52 Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) and IEEE 802.1x: Tutorial and Empirical Experience JYH-CHENG CHEN AND YU-PING WANG, NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY Abstract oped WIRE1x to support various versions of MS Windows. As This article presents the technical details of the Extensible the name suggests, WIRE1x is an open-source implementa- Authentication Protocol (EAP) and IEEE 802.1x by using tion of IEEE 802.1x client (supplicant)1 developed by the WIRE1x, an open-source implementation of IEEE 802.1x Wireless Internet Research & Engineering (WIRE) Laborato- client (supplicant) and various EAP-based authentication ry.2 Both source code and executable code of WIRE1x can be mechanisms. By using a real implementation, 802.1x and EAP downloaded freely from http://wire.cs.nthu.edu.tw/wire1x/. should be easily understood. Essentially, 802.1x provides a framework for port-based access control. It can work with various authentication mecha- nisms to authenticate and authorize users. The Extensible Introduction Authentication Protocol (EAP, IETF RFC 2284) is a protocol Wireless local area networks (WLANs) have become increas- commonly used in 802.1x to authenticate users. Currently, ingly more prevalent in recent years. The IEEE 802.11 stan- WIRE1x provides various authentication mechanisms, includ- dard is one of the most widely adopted standards for ing EAP Message Digest 5 (EAP-MD5, IETF RFC 1321), broadband wireless Internet access. However, security consid- EAP Transport Layer Security (EAP-TLS, IETF RFC 2716), erations with regard to wireless environments are more com- EAP Tunneled TLS (EAP-TTLS) [5], and Protected Extensi- plicated than those in wired environments. -
Architectures for Broadband Residential IP Services Over CATV Networks Enrique J
12 Architectures for Broadband Residential IP Services Over CATV Networks Enrique J. Hernandez-Valencia, Bell Laboratories, USA Abstract The current state of the art in digital broadband access technologies to support emerging telecommunications services makes imminent the introduction of interac- tive broadband services — including data, video and the Internet — into the resi- dential market. Over the last few years, much attention has been paid to the development of media access control protocols for cable TV networks that will allow the immediate support of broadband data services as the first step toward enhanced communications services for residential users. Here we review some of the architectural options that must be carefully considered in order to deliver IP ser- vices to such users in an efficient yet flexible manner. uture residential cable data services are expected to • Support for data forwarding/routing services, including IP deliver Internet access, work-at-home applications, Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) and the Internet Con- small business access, local area network LAN-LAN trol Message Protocol (ICMP) interconnect, and LAN emulation services over cable • Host address configuration TV (CATV) networks. These services are anticipated as a • Subscription FFnatural extension to the residential consumer market of the • Security data networking capabilities in the business sector today [1]. In addition, any proposed access architecture for broad- Although related residential Internet Protocol (IP) services band residential data services will be expected to support are already being trialed in the marketplace, substantive existing IP services such as the Dynamic Host Configuration standardization efforts in this area did not materialize until Protocol [6], Domain Name System [8], IP Multicasting and quite recently. -
Aerohive Configuration Guide: RADIUS Authentication | 2
Aerohive Configuration Guide RADIUS Authentication Aerohive Configuration Guide: RADIUS Authentication | 2 Copyright © 2012 Aerohive Networks, Inc. All rights reserved Aerohive Networks, Inc. 330 Gibraltar Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 P/N 330068-03, Rev. A To learn more about Aerohive products visit www.aerohive.com/techdocs Aerohive Networks, Inc. Aerohive Configuration Guide: RADIUS Authentication | 3 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 IEEE 802.1X Primer................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Example 1: Single Site Authentication .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Step 1: Configuring the Network Policy ..............................................................................................................................................................7 Step 2: Configuring the Interface and User Access .........................................................................................................................................7 Step 3: Uploading the Configuration and Certificates .................................................................................................................................... -
Kerberos: an Authentication Service for Computer Networks by Clifford Neuman and Theodore Ts’O
Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Computer Networks by Clifford Neuman and Theodore Ts’o Presented by: Smitha Sundareswaran Chi Tsong Su Introduction z Kerberos: An authentication protocol based on cryptography z Designed at MIT under project Athena z Variation of Needham Schroeder protocol - Difference: Kerberos assumes all systems on the network to be synchronized z Similar function as its mythological namesake: “guards” the access to network protocols Contribution z Defines ideas of authentication, Integrity, confidentiality and Authorization z Working of Kerberos z Limitations z Utilities z How to obtain and use Kerberos z Other methods to improve security Why Kerberos? z Foils threats due to eavesdropping z More convenient than password based authentication { Allows user to avoid “authentication by assertion” z Authentication based on cryptography: attacker can’t impersonate a valid user How Kerberos Works z Distributed authentication service using a series of encrypted messages {Password doesn’t pass through the network z Timestamps to reduce the number of messages needed for authentication z “Ticket granting Service” for subsequent authentication Kerberos Authentication and Encryption zAuthentication proves that a client is running on behalf of a particular user zUses encryption key for authentication {Encryption key = Password zEncryption implemented using DES {Checksum included in message checksum and encryption provide integrity & confidentiality The Kerberos Ticket z Initially, client and Server don’t share an encryption -
Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab Roch H. Glitho
Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab 1 Roch H. Glitho Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab Layering in next generation networks Services ( value-added services) also called application / services . Services (Basic service) also called call/session Transport (Below IP + IP + transport layer) also called bearer 2 Roch H. Glitho Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab Layering in next generation networks Infrastructural, application, middleware and baseware services Services NGN Resources service Service Service . management functions control functions Transport Transport s e management functions control functions c r NGN u o s transport e R Transfer functional area 3 Roch H. Glitho Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab Layering in UMTS UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication Systems) - An example of 3G system: - Evolution of GSM - Use of WCDMA - Largest footprint - Another example of 3G system - Evolution of CDMA -One - Use of WCDMA, but a version incompatible with UMTS - Dwindling footprint 4 Roch H. Glitho Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab Layering in UMTS UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication Systems) - UMTS transport: - TCP - IP - Below IP - WCDMA - Bandwidth (Peak rate: single digit Mbits/s – usually lower than 2) 5 Roch H. Glitho Telecommunication Services Engineering Lab Layering in UMTS UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication Systems) - UMTS Service: - IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) - Basic service (call / session or control layer) - Value added services (value added service or service layer) - Focus -
Network Access Control and Cloud Security
NETWORK ACCESS CONTROL AND CLOUD SECURITY Tran Song Dat Phuc SeoulTech 2015 Table of Contents Network Access Control (NAC) Network Access Enforcement Methods Extensible Authentication Protocol IEEE 802.1X Port-Based NAC Cloud Computing Cloud Security Risks and Countermeasures Cloud Security as a Service (SecaaS) Network Access Control (NAC) • “Network Access Control (NAC) is a computer networking solution that uses a set of protocols to define and implement a policy that describes how to secure access to network nodes by devices when they initially attempt to access the network.” – wikipedia. • “NAC is an approach to computer network security that attempts to unify endpoint security technology (such as antivirus, host intrusion prevention, and vulnerability assessment), user or system authentication and network security enforcement.” – wikipedia. • NAC authenticates users logging into the network and determines what data they can access and action they can perform. • NAC examines the health of the user’s computer or mobile device (the endpoints). Network Access Control (NAC) • Access requestor (AR): referred to as supplicants, or clients. The AR is the node that is attempting to access the network and may be any device that is managed by the NAC system. • Policy server: Based on the AR’s posture and an enterprise’s defined policy, the policy server determines what access should be granted. • Network access server (NAS): Also called a media gateway, a remote access server (RAS), or a policy server. The NAS functions as an access control point for users in remote locations connecting to an enterprise’s internal network. Network Access Control (NAC) NAC Context Network Access Enforcement Methods • Enforcement methods are the actions that are applied to ARs to regulate access to the enterprise network. -
PUF Based Authentication Protocol for Iot
S S symmetry Article PUF Based Authentication Protocol for IoT An Braeken Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium; [email protected]; Tel.: +32-468-104-767 Received: 11 July 2018; Accepted: 11 August 2018; Published: 20 August 2018 Abstract: Key agreement between two constrained Internet of Things (IoT) devices that have not met each other is an essential feature to provide in order to establish trust among its users. Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) on a device represent a low cost primitive exploiting the unique random patterns in the device and have been already applied in a multitude of applications for secure key generation and key agreement in order to avoid an attacker to take over the identity of a tampered device, whose key material has been extracted. This paper shows that the key agreement scheme of a recently proposed PUF based protocol, presented by Chatterjee et al., for Internet of Things (IoT) is vulnerable for man-in-the-middle, impersonation, and replay attacks in the Yao–Dolev security model. We propose an alternative scheme, which is able to solve these issues and can provide in addition a more efficient key agreement and subsequently a communication phase between two IoT devices connected to the same authentication server. The scheme also offers identity based authentication and repudiation, when only using elliptic curve multiplications and additions, instead of the compute intensive pairing operations. Keywords: physical unclonable function; authentication; elliptic curve cryptography; internet of things 1. Introduction Internet of Things (IoT) is experiencing worldwide growth. Not only classical computing and communication devices are connected, but also a whole range of other gadgets that are used in our daily life, such as thermostats, light switches, door locks, refrigerators, etc. -
Recommendation for EAP Methods
Archived NIST Technical Series Publication The attached publication has been archived (withdrawn), and is provided solely for historical purposes. It may have been superseded by another publication (indicated below). Archived Publication Series/Number: NIST Special Publication 800-120 Title: Recommendation for EAP Methods Used in Wireless Network Access Authentication Publication Date(s): September 2009 Withdrawal Date: October 19, 2018 Withdrawal Note: This publication is out of date. Refer to relevant standards from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), http://www.ietf.org/ . Superseding Publication(s) The attached publication has been superseded by the following publication(s): Series/Number: Title: Author(s): Publication Date(s): URL/DOI: Additional Information (if applicable) Contact: Computer Security Division (Information Technology Laboratory) Latest revision of the attached publication: Related information: https://csrc.nist.gov https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-120/archive/2009-09-17 Withdrawal N/A announcement (link): Date updated: October 19, 2018 NIST Special Publication 800-120 Recommendation for EAP Methods Used in Wireless Network Access Authentication Katrin Hoeper and Lily Chen Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y September 2009 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Patrick Gallagher, Deputy Director Abstract This Recommendation specifies security requirements for authentication methods with key establishment supported by the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) defined in IETF RFC 3748 for wireless access authentications to federal networks. KEY WORDS: EAP methods, authentication, key establishment. SP 800-120: Recommendation for EAP Methods Used in Wireless Network Access Authentication Acknowledgments The authors, Katrin Hoeper and Lily Chen, wish to thank their colleagues who reviewed drafts of this document and contributed to its technical content.