FEASIBILITY STUDY Proposed Aloft South Arlington

SWQ INTERSTATE 20 AND SOUTH COLLINS STREET ARLINGTON, TEXAS

SUBMITTED TO:PR OPOSED PREPARED BY: Mr. Hiren Desai HVS Consulting & Valuation Stonewood Division of TS Worldwide, LLC 682 Flagstone Drive 2601 Sagebrush Drive, Suite 101 Irving, Texas Flower Mound, Texas, 75028

+1 (469) 995-9645 +1 (972) 890-3548

November-2018

November 8, 2018

Mr. Hiren Desai Stonewood Hotels 682 Flagstone Drive Irving, Texas

HVS DALLAS Re: Proposed Aloft South Arlington

2601 Sagebrush Drive, Suite 101 Arlington, Texas Flower Mound, Texas, 75028 HVS Reference: 2018021901 +1 (972) 890-3548 +1 (516) 742-3059 FAX www.hvs.com Dear Mr. Desai:

Pursuant to your request, we herewith submit our feasibility study pertaining to the above-captioned property. We have inspected the real estate and analyzed the

market conditions in the Arlington, Texas area. We have studied the proposed project, and the results of our fieldwork and analysis are presented in this report. We have also reviewed the proposed improvements for this site. Our report was prepared in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), as provided by the Appraisal Foundation.

We hereby certify that we have no undisclosed interest in the property, and our employment and compensation are not contingent upon our findings. This study is subject to the comments made throughout this report and to all assumptions and

limiting conditions set forth herein.

Sincerely, TS Worldwide, LLC

Kathleen D. Donahue, Senior Vice President, Partner

[email protected], +1 (972) 890-3548 State Appraiser License TX 1337633 G

Superior results through unrivaled hospitality intelligence. Everywhere.

Table of Contents

SECTION TITLE PAGE 1. Executive Summary 5 Ownership, Franchise, and Management Assumptions 5 Summary of Hotel Market Trends 6 Summary of Forecast Occupancy and Average Rate 10 Summary of Forecast Income and Expense Statement 10 Feasibility Conclusion 13 2. Description of the Site and Neighborhood 16 Physical Characteristics 16 Access and Visibility 19 Airport Access 21 Neighborhood 21 Flood Zone 22 Zoning 23 3. Market Area Analysis 24 Workforce Characteristics 27 Radial Demographic Snapshot 31 Unemployment Statistics 33 Major Business and Industry 34 Office Space Statistics 35 Convention Activity 38 Airport Traffic 39 Tourist Attractions 42 4. Supply and Demand Analysis 43 Definition of Subject Hotel Market 43 Historical Supply and Demand Data 43 Competitive Supply 46 Supply Changes 50

Demand Analysis Using Market Segmentation 52 Latent Demand 53 Accommodated Demand and Market-wide Occupancy 55 5. Description of the Proposed Improvements 58 Project Overview 58 Summary of the Facilities 59 ADA and Environmental 65 Capital Expenditures 65 Construction Budget 65 Conclusion 66 6. Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate 68 Forecast of Subject Property’s Occupancy 68 Average Rate Analysis 71 7. Projection of Income and Expense 73 Comparable Operating Statements 73 Forecast of Revenue and Expense 77 Property Taxes 80 8. Feasibility Analysis 84 Construction Cost Estimate 84 Mortgage-Equity Method 87 Conclusion 89 9. Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 91 10. Certification 94

Addenda

Qualifications Copy of Appraisal License(s)

1. Executive Summary

Subject of the The subject of the feasibility study is a 113,528-square-foot (2.61-acre) site to be Feasibility Study improved with a select-service lodging facility; the hotel will be associated with the Aloft Hotels brand. The property, which is expected to open on June 1, 2020, will feature 124 rooms, a bar, 785 square feet of meeting space, an outdoor pool, an outdoor patio seating area, a fitness room, a business center, a market pantry, and a guest laundry room. The hotel will also contain the appropriate parking capacity (126) and all necessary back-of-the-house space.

RENDERING OF PROJECT

The proposed hotel represents the second Aloft hotel in the city of Arlington. The subject site’s location is in the southwest quadrant formed by Interstate 20 and South Collins Street in Arlington, Texas, 76018.

Pertinent Dates The effective date of the report is November 8, 2018. The subject site was inspected by Kathleen D. Donahue on October 16, 2018.

Ownership, Franchise, The developer of the proposed subject hotel is Hiren Desai/Stonewood Hotels, and Management which is based in Irving, Texas. The subject site is part of a larger 9.75-acre parcel. Assumptions In May 2018, Collins Road Development, LLC purchased the 9.75-acre parcel from Moritz Interests Ltd. for an unknown price; Tarrant Appraisal District records do not list the transaction details, and the buyer of the subject site was unaware of the purchase price. Prior to the 2018 sale, the 9.75-acre parcel has been owned by Moritz Interest since 1994. Since June 30, 2018, Hiren Desai has been under contract to purchase the 2.61-acre subject site from Collins Road Development, LLC for a reported price of $12.00 per square foot, or $1,362,336.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 5

The proposed subject hotel will be managed by Stonewood Hotels. We assume that the proposed hotel will be managed by a professional hotel-operating company, with fees deducted at rates consistent with current market standards. We have assumed a market-appropriate total management fee of 3.0% of total revenues in our study.

The proposed subject hotel will reportedly operate under a franchise agreement with as an Aloft. A copy of the agreement was not provided for our review. Based on our review of the agreement’s terms or expected terms, the Aloft Hotels franchise is reflected in our forecasts with a royalty fee of 5.5% of rooms revenue, and a marketing assessment of 4% of rooms revenue.

Summary of Hotel This selected set of competitive hotels achieved a RevPAR of nearly $40 in 2008, Market Trends before it declined to a low point of roughly $32 by year-end 2009 because of the recession. A recovery began in 2010 that accelerated in 2011 given atypical average rate growth associated with Super Bowl XLV. From 2010 through 2016, both occupancy and average rate registered year-over-year improvements. Limited supply change and the continued expansion of the local economy were largely responsible for this period of growth. This trend reversed in 2017 as supply growth caused occupancy declines despite continued demand gains. Year-to-date 2018 data illustrate a minimal softening in occupancy and a roughly $2 gain in average rate. The continued absorption of competitive new supply, combined with the high- quality hotel inventory in South Arlington, has contributed to the latest trend. The near-term outlook is positive; while new hotel supply is expected, continued development in the area should allow for induced demand and the absorption of new supply over the long term.

The following table provides a historical perspective on the supply and demand trends for a selected set of hotels, as provided by STR.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 6

FIGURE 1-1 HISTORICAL SUPPLY AND DEMAND TRENDS (STR)

Average Daily Room Occupied Room Average Year Count Available Room Nights Change Nights Change Occupancy Rate Change RevPAR Change

2008 1,193 435,445 — 301,400 — 69.2 % $57.24 — $39.62 — 2009 1,209 441,301 1.3 % 268,060 (11.1) % 60.7 53.29 (6.9) % 32.37 (18.3) % 2010 1,383 504,887 14.4 316,990 18.3 62.8 55.58 4.3 34.89 7.8 2011 1,391 507,708 0.6 345,445 9.0 68.0 60.63 9.1 41.26 18.2 2012 1,380 503,547 (0.8) 358,922 3.9 71.3 61.14 0.8 43.58 5.6 2013 1,379 503,335 (0.0) 360,567 0.5 71.6 63.67 4.2 45.61 4.7 2014 1,379 503,335 0.0 366,070 1.5 72.7 66.78 4.9 48.57 6.5 2015 1,380 503,580 0.0 370,601 1.2 73.6 71.33 6.8 52.49 8.1 2016 1,389 506,831 0.6 380,545 2.7 75.1 75.82 6.3 56.93 8.5 2017 1,481 540,565 6.7 390,266 2.6 72.2 77.64 2.4 56.05 (1.5) Year-to-Date Through September 2017 1,481 404,313 — 295,553 — 73.1 % $77.23 — $56.45 — 2018 1,481 404,313 0.0 % 293,855 (0.6) % 72.7 79.01 2.3 % 57.43 1.7 % Average Annual Compounded Change: 2008 - 2011 5.3 % 4.7 % 1.9 % 1.4 % 2011 - 2017 1.1 2.1 4.2 5.2

Competitive Number Year Year Hotels Included in Sample Class Status of Rooms Affiliated Opened Quality Inn @ Arlington Highlands Midscale Class Secondary 128 Feb 2007 Dec 1985 Arlington Economy Class Secondary 66 Apr 2015 Feb 1995 Studio 6 South Arlington Economy Class Secondary 142 Jan 2001 Apr 1995 Express & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall Upper Midscale Class Primary 101 Sep 1995 Sep 1995 La Quinta Inns & Suites Dallas Arlington South Midscale Class Primary 128 May 1997 Ma y 1997 InTown Suites Arlington I20 Economy Class Secondary 133 May 2002 Dec 1997 Microtel Inn & Suites by Wyndham Dallas Arlington Economy Class Secondary 45 Oct 1998 Oct 1998 InTown Suites Arlington Economy Class Secondary 121 Nov 1998 Nov 1998 Arlington Economy Class Secondary 50 Nov 1999 Nov 1999 InTown Suites Arlington South Economy Class Secondary 121 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 Arlington East Economy Class Secondary 48 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Hampton Inn Suites Dallas Arlington South Upper Midscale Class Primary 98 Nov 2007 Nov 2007 Residence Inn Dallas Arlington South Upscale Class Primary 96 Nov 2009 Nov 2009 Courtyard Dallas Arlington South Upscale Class Primary 103 Feb 2010 Feb 2010 Homewood Suites Dallas Arlington South Upscale Class Primary 101 Dec 2016 Dec 2016

Total 1,481 Source: STR

The following tables reflect our estimates of operating data for hotels on an individual basis. These trends are presented in detail in the Supply and Demand Analysis chapter of this report.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 7

FIGURE 1-2 PRIMARY COMPETITORS – OPERATING PERFORMANCE

Est. Segmentation Estimated 2016 Estimated 2017

Weighted Weighted Annual Annual Number of Room Room Occupancy Yield

Property Rooms Commercial Group Leisure Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR Penetration Penetration

Hilton Garden Inn Dallas Arlington South 132 55 % 25 % 20 % 0 — — — 132 60 - 65 % $120 - $125 $75 - $80 85 - 90 % 100 - 110 %

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 103 65 15 20 103 80 - 85 130 - 140 105 - 110 103 75 - 80 125 - 130 100 - 105 110 - 120 130 - 140

Hampton Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 98 65 15 20 98 75 - 80 115 - 120 90 - 95 98 65 - 70 110 - 115 80 - 85 95 - 100 110 - 120

Holiday Inn Express & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall 101 55 20 25 101 70 - 75 115 - 120 80 - 85 101 65 - 70 110 - 115 75 - 80 90 - 95 100 - 110

La Quinta Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 128 50 25 25 128 70 - 75 90 - 95 65 - 70 128 65 - 70 90 - 95 60 - 65 90 - 95 80 - 85

Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Arlington South 101 65 15 20 9 20 - 25 115 - 120 20 - 25 101 60 - 65 115 - 120 75 - 80 90 - 95 100 - 110

Residence Inn by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 96 70 10 20 96 85 - 90 140 - 150 120 - 125 96 85 - 90 130 - 140 115 - 120 120 - 130 150 - 160

Sub-Totals/Averages 759 61 % 18 % 21 % 535 77.0 % $118.66 $91.36 759 70.8 % $117.45 $83.14 99.6 % 114.4 %

Secondary Competitors 854 50 % 15 % 35 % 214 74.0 % $48.00 $35.52 214 72.0 % $49.25 $35.46 101.3 % 48.8 %

Totals/Averages 1,613 58 % 17 % 24 % 748 76.1 % $99.06 $75.43 973 71.1 % $102.28 $72.67 100.0 % 100.0 % * Specific occupancy and average rate data were utilized in our analysis, but are presented in ranges in the above table for the purposes of confidentiality.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 8

FIGURE 1-3 SECONDARY COMPETITORS – OPERATING PERFORMANCE

Est. Segmentation Estimated 2016 Estimated 2017

Weighted Weighted Total Annual Annual Number of Competitive Room Room

Property Rooms Commercial Group Leisure Level Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR

Secondary Competitors 854 50 % 15 % 35 % 25 % 214 70 - 75 % $45 - $50 $35 - $40 214 70 - 75 % $45 - $50 $35 - $40 Aggregate

Totals/Averages 854 50 % 15 % 35 % 25 % 214 74.0 % $48.00 $35.52 214 72.0 % $49.25 $35.46

* Specific occupancy and average rate data was utilized in our analysis, but is presented in ranges in the above table for the purposes of confidentiality.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 9

Summary of Forecast Based on our analysis presented in the Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate Occupancy and chapter, we have chosen to use a stabilized occupancy level of 72% and a base-year Average Rate rate position of $115.00 for the proposed subject hotel. The following table reflects a summary of our market-wide and proposed subject hotel occupancy and average rate projections.

FIGURE 1-4 MARKET AND SUBJECT PROPERTY AVERAGE RATE FORECAST

Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Ma rket ADR $102.28 $104.83 $106.93 $109.07 $111.80 $115.15 $118.61 $122.16 $125.83 Projected Market ADR Growth Rate — 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

Proposed Subject Property ADR (As-If Stabilized) $115.00 $117.88 $120.23 $122.64 $125.70 $129.47 $133.36 $137.36 $141.48 ADR Growth Rate — 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

Proposed Subject Stabilized ADR Penetration 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112.4%

Fiscal Year 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26

Proposed Subject Property Average Rate $123.91 $127.26 $131.08 $135.01 $139.06 $143.24 Opening Discount 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Average Rate After Discount $121.43 $125.99 $131.08 $135.01 $139.06 $143.24 Real Average Rate Growth — 3.8% 4.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Ma rket ADR $110.20 $113.18 $116.58 $120.08 $123.68 $127.39 Proposed Subject ADR Penetration (After Discount) 110% 111% 112% 112% 112% 112% ADR Expressed in Base-Year Dollars Deflated @ Inflation Rate $112.21 $113.04 $114.18 $114.18 $114.18 $114.18

Summary of Forecast Our positioning of each revenue and expense level is supported by comparable Income and Expense operations or trends specific to this market. Our forecast of income and expense is Statement presented in the following table.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 10

FIGURE 1-5 DETAILED FORECAST OF INCOME AND EXPENSE

2020/21 Begins June 2021/22 Stabilized 2023/24 2024/25 Number of Rooms: 124 124 124 124 124 Occupancy: 64% 68% 72% 72% 72% Average Rate: $121.43 $125.99 $131.08 $135.01 $139.06 RevPAR: $77.71 $85.67 $94.38 $97.21 $100.13 Days Open: 365 365 365 365 365 Occupied Rooms: 28,966 %Gross PAR POR 30,777 %Gross PAR POR 32,587 %Gross PAR POR 32,587 %Gross PAR POR 32,587 %Gross PAR POR OPERATING REVENUE Rooms $3,517 91.1 % $28,363 $121.42 $3,878 91.4 % $31,274 $126.00 $4,272 91.7 % $34,452 $131.09 $4,400 91.7 % $35,484 $135.02 $4,532 91.7 % $36,548 $139.07 Food 115 3.0 924 3.95 123 2.9 995 4.01 133 2.8 1,069 4.07 137 2.8 1,101 4.19 141 2.8 1,134 4.32 Beverage 167 4.3 1,350 5.78 178 4.2 1,436 5.79 189 4.1 1,527 5.81 195 4.1 1,573 5.99 201 4.1 1,620 6.17 Other Operated Departments 52 1.3 417 1.79 54 1.3 437 1.76 57 1.2 458 1.74 59 1.2 472 1.80 60 1.2 486 1.85 Miscellaneous Income 9 0.2 70 0.30 9 0.2 73 0.29 9 0.2 76 0.29 10 0.2 79 0.30 10 0.2 81 0.31 Total Operating Revenues 3,859 100.0 31,123 133.23 4,243 100.0 34,216 137.85 4,660 100.0 37,582 143.01 4,800 100.0 38,709 147.29 4,944 100.0 39,870 151.71 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES * Rooms 808 23.0 6,516 27.89 852 22.0 6,867 27.67 897 21.0 7,234 27.53 924 21.0 7,451 28.35 952 21.0 7,675 29.20 Food & Beverage 220 78.2 1,777 7.61 231 76.5 1,860 7.50 241 75.0 1,947 7.41 249 75.0 2,006 7.63 256 75.0 2,066 7.86 Other Operated Departments 27 51.2 214 0.92 27 50.6 221 0.89 28 50.0 229 0.87 29 50.0 236 0.90 30 50.0 243 0.92 Total Expenses 1,055 27.3 8,506 36.41 1,110 26.2 8,949 36.06 1,167 25.0 9,410 35.81 1,202 25.0 9,693 36.88 1,238 25.0 9,983 37.99 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 2,805 72.7 22,617 96.82 3,133 73.8 25,267 101.80 3,493 75.0 28,172 107.20 3,598 75.0 29,016 110.41 3,706 75.0 29,886 113.72 UNDISTRIBUTED OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 356 9.2 2,868 12.28 372 8.8 2,999 12.08 389 8.4 3,138 11.94 401 8.4 3,232 12.30 413 8.4 3,329 12.67 Info & Telecom Systems 40 1.0 319 1.36 41 1.0 333 1.34 43 0.9 349 1.33 45 0.9 359 1.37 46 0.9 370 1.41 Marketing 158 4.1 1,275 5.46 165 3.9 1,333 5.37 173 3.7 1,395 5.31 178 3.7 1,437 5.47 183 3.7 1,480 5.63 Franchise Fee 334 8.7 2,694 11.53 368 8.7 2,971 11.97 406 8.7 3,273 12.45 418 8.7 3,371 12.83 431 8.7 3,472 13.21 Prop. Operations & Maint. 101 2.6 818 3.50 129 3.0 1,039 4.18 159 3.4 1,279 4.87 163 3.4 1,317 5.01 168 3.4 1,356 5.16 Utilities 132 3.4 1,062 4.55 138 3.2 1,111 4.48 144 3.1 1,162 4.42 148 3.1 1,197 4.56 153 3.1 1,233 4.69 Total Expenses 1,121 29.0 9,037 38.68 1,213 28.6 9,786 39.43 1,314 28.2 10,595 40.32 1,353 28.2 10,913 41.53 1,394 28.2 11,240 42.77 GROSS HOUSE PROFIT 1,684 43.7 13,580 58.14 1,920 45.2 15,480 62.37 2,180 46.8 17,577 66.88 2,245 46.8 18,103 68.88 2,312 46.8 18,646 70.95 Management Fee 116 3.0 934 4.00 127 3.0 1,026 4.14 140 3.0 1,127 4.29 144 3.0 1,161 4.42 148 3.0 1,196 4.55 INCOME BEFORE NON-OPR. INC. & EXP. 1,568 40.7 12,647 54.14 1,792 42.2 14,454 58.24 2,040 43.8 16,449 62.59 2,101 43.8 16,942 64.47 2,164 43.8 17,450 66.40 NON-OPERATING INCOME & EXPENSE Property Taxes 267 6.9 2,156 9.23 274 6.5 2,210 8.90 282 6.1 2,277 8.66 291 6.1 2,345 8.92 299 6.1 2,415 9.19 Insurance 54 1.4 438 1.88 56 1.3 451 1.82 58 1.2 465 1.77 59 1.2 479 1.82 61 1.2 493 1.88 Reserve for Replacement 77 2.0 622 2.66 127 3.0 1,026 4.14 186 4.0 1,503 5.72 192 4.0 1,548 5.89 198 4.0 1,595 6.07 Total Expenses 399 10.3 3,217 13.77 457 10.8 3,688 14.86 526 11.3 4,245 16.15 542 11.3 4,372 16.64 558 11.3 4,503 17.14 EBITDA LESS RESERVE $1,169 30.4 % $9,430 $40.37 $1,335 31.4 % $10,766 $43.38 $1,513 32.5 % $12,204 $46.44 $1,559 32.5 % $12,570 $47.83 $1,605 32.5 % $12,947 $49.26 *Departmental expenses are expressed as a percentage of departmental revenues.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 11

FIGURE 1-6 TEN-YEAR FORECAST OF INCOME AND EXPENSE

2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30

Number of Rooms: 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 Occupied Rooms: 28,966 30,777 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 Occupancy: 64% 68% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% Average Rate: $121.43 % of $125.99 % of $131.08 % of $135.01 % of $139.06 % of $143.24 % of $147.53 % of $151.96 % of $156.52 % of $161.21 % of RevPAR: $77.71 Gross $85.67 Gross $94.38 Gross $97.21 Gross $100.13 Gross $103.13 Gross $106.22 Gross $109.41 Gross $112.69 Gross $116.07 Gross OPERATING REVENUE Rooms $3,517 91.1 % $3,878 91.4 % $4,272 91.7 % $4,400 91.7 % $4,532 91.7 % $4,668 91.7 % $4,808 91.7 % $4,952 91.7 % $5,100 91.7 % $5,253 91.7 % Food 115 3.0 123 2.9 133 2.8 137 2.8 141 2.8 145 2.8 149 2.8 154 2.8 158 2.8 163 2.8 Beverage 167 4.3 178 4.2 189 4.1 195 4.1 201 4.1 207 4.1 213 4.1 220 4.1 226 4.1 233 4.1 Other Operated Departments 52 1.3 54 1.3 57 1.2 59 1.2 60 1.2 62 1.2 64 1.2 66 1.2 68 1.2 70 1.2 Miscellaneous Income 9 0.2 9 0.2 9 0.2 10 0.2 10 0.2 10 0.2 11 0.2 11 0.2 11 0.2 12 0.2 Total Operating Revenues 3,859 100.0 4,243 100.0 4,660 100.0 4,800 100.0 4,944 100.0 5,092 100.0 5,245 100.0 5,402 100.0 5,564 100.0 5,730 100.0 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES * Rooms 808 23.0 852 22.0 897 21.0 924 21.0 952 21.0 980 21.0 1,010 21.0 1,040 21.0 1,071 21.0 1,103 21.0 Food & Beverage 220 78.2 231 76.5 241 75.0 249 75.0 256 75.0 264 75.0 272 75.0 280 75.0 288 75.0 297 75.0 Other Operated Departments 27 51.2 27 50.6 28 50.0 29 50.0 30 50.0 31 50.0 32 50.0 33 50.0 34 50.0 35 50.0 Total Expenses 1,055 27.3 1,110 26.2 1,167 25.0 1,202 25.0 1,238 25.0 1,275 25.0 1,313 25.0 1,353 25.0 1,393 25.0 1,435 25.0 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 2,805 72.7 3,133 73.8 3,493 75.0 3,598 75.0 3,706 75.0 3,817 75.0 3,932 75.0 4,049 75.0 4,170 75.0 4,295 75.0 UNDISTRIBUTED OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 356 9.2 372 8.8 389 8.4 401 8.4 413 8.4 425 8.4 438 8.4 451 8.4 465 8.4 479 8.4 Info & Telecom Systems 40 1.0 41 1.0 43 0.9 45 0.9 46 0.9 47 0.9 49 0.9 50 0.9 52 0.9 53 0.9 Marketing 158 4.1 165 3.9 173 3.7 178 3.7 183 3.7 189 3.7 195 3.7 200 3.7 207 3.7 213 3.7 Franchise Fee 334 8.7 368 8.7 406 8.7 418 8.7 431 8.7 443 8.7 457 8.7 470 8.7 485 8.7 499 8.7 Prop. Operations & Maint. 101 2.6 129 3.0 159 3.4 163 3.4 168 3.4 173 3.4 178 3.4 184 3.4 189 3.4 195 3.4 Utilities 132 3.4 138 3.2 144 3.1 148 3.1 153 3.1 157 3.1 162 3.1 167 3.1 172 3.1 177 3.1 Total Expenses 1,121 29.0 1,213 28.6 1,314 28.2 1,353 28.2 1,394 28.2 1,436 28.2 1,479 28.2 1,523 28.2 1,569 28.2 1,616 28.2 GROSS HOUSE PROFIT 1,684 43.7 1,920 45.2 2,180 46.8 2,245 46.8 2,312 46.8 2,381 46.8 2,453 46.8 2,526 46.8 2,602 46.8 2,680 46.8 Management Fee 116 3.0 127 3.0 140 3.0 144 3.0 148 3.0 153 3.0 157 3.0 162 3.0 167 3.0 172 3.0 INCOME BEFORE NON-OPR. INC. & EXP. 1,568 40.7 1,792 42.2 2,040 43.8 2,101 43.8 2,164 43.8 2,229 43.8 2,296 43.8 2,364 43.8 2,435 43.8 2,508 43.8 NON-OPERATING INCOME & EXPENSE Property Taxes 267 6.9 274 6.5 282 6.1 291 6.1 299 6.1 308 6.1 318 6.1 327 6.1 337 6.1 347 6.1 Insurance 54 1.4 56 1.3 58 1.2 59 1.2 61 1.2 63 1.2 65 1.2 67 1.2 69 1.2 71 1.2 Reserve for Replacement 77 2.0 127 3.0 186 4.0 192 4.0 198 4.0 204 4.0 210 4.0 216 4.0 223 4.0 229 4.0 Total Expenses 399 10.3 457 10.8 526 11.3 542 11.3 558 11.3 575 11.3 592 11.3 610 11.3 628 11.3 647 11.3 EBITDA LESS RESERVE $1,169 30.4 % $1,335 31.4 % $1,513 32.5 % $1,559 32.5 % $1,605 32.5 % $1,654 32.5 % $1,703 32.5 % $1,754 32.5 % $1,806 32.5 % $1,860 32.5 % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 12

As illustrated, the hotel is expected to stabilize at a profitable level. Please refer to the Forecast of Income and Expense chapter of our report for a detailed explanation of the methodology used in deriving this forecast.

Feasibility Conclusion The Feasibility Analysis chapter of this report converts these cash flows into a net present value indication assuming set-forth debt and equity requirements. The conclusion of this analysis indicates that an equity investor contributing $5,245,000 (roughly 35% of the $15,000,000 development cost) could expect to receive a 20.5% internal rate of return over a ten-year holding period, assuming that the investor obtains financing at the time of the project’s completion at the loan-to-value ratio and interest rate set forth. The proposed subject hotel has an opportunity to provide an elevated guestroom product within the South Arlington market. Based on our market analysis, there is sufficient market support for the proposed Aloft hotel. Our review of investor surveys indicates equity returns ranging from 12.7% to 26.1%, with an average of 19.1%. Based on these parameters, the calculated return to the equity investor, 20.5%, is above the average and within the range of market-level returns given the developer's anticipated cost of $15,000,000 (does not include entrepreneurial incentive).

Assignment Conditions “Extraordinary Assumption” is defined in USPAP as follows:

An assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. Comment: Uncertain information might include physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or the integrity of data used in an analysis.1

The analysis is based on the extraordinary assumption that the described improvements have been completed as of the stated date of opening. The reader should understand that the completed subject property does not yet exist as of the date of this report. Our feasibility study does not address unforeseeable events that could alter the proposed project, and/or the market conditions reflected in the analyses; we assume that no significant changes, other than those anticipated and explained in this report, shall take place between the date of inspection and stated date of opening. The use of this extraordinary assumption may have affected the assignment results. We have made no other extraordinary assumptions specific to this feasibility study. However, several important general assumptions have been made that apply to this feasibility study and our studies of proposed hotels in

1 The Appraisal Foundation, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2018–2019 ed.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 13

general. These aspects are set forth in the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions chapter of this report.

Intended Use of the This feasibility report is being prepared for use in the development of the proposed Feasibility Study subject hotel.

Identification of the The client for this engagement is Stonewood Hotels. This report is intended for the Client and Intended addressee firm and may not be distributed to or relied upon by other persons or User(s) entities.

Scope of Work The methodology used to develop this study is based on the market research and valuation techniques set forth in the textbooks authored by Hospitality Valuation Services for the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and the Appraisal Institute, entitled The Valuation of Hotels and Motels,2 Hotels, Motels and Restaurants: Valuations and Market Studies,3 The Computerized Income Approach to Hotel/Motel Market Studies and Valuations,4 Hotels and Motels: A Guide to Market Analysis, Investment Analysis, and Valuations,5 and Hotels and Motels – Valuations and Market Studies.6

1. All information was collected and analyzed by the staff of TS Worldwide, LLC. Information was supplied by the client and/or the property’s development team. 2. The subject site has been evaluated from the viewpoint of its physical utility for the future operation of a hotel, as well as access, visibility, and other relevant factors. 3. The subject property's proposed improvements have been reviewed for their expected quality of construction, design, and layout efficiency. 4. The surrounding economic environment, on both an area and neighborhood level, has been reviewed to identify specific hostelry-related economic and demographic trends that may have an impact on future demand for hotels.

2 Stephen Rushmore, The Valuation of Hotels and Motels. (Chicago: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 1978). 3 Stephen Rushmore, Hotels, Motels and Restaurants: Valuations and Market Studies. (Chicago: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 1983). 4 Stephen Rushmore, The Computerized Income Approach to Hotel/Motel Market Studies and Valuations. (Chicago: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 1990). 5 Stephen Rushmore, Hotels and Motels: A Guide to Market Analysis, Investment Analysis, and Valuations (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 1992). 6 Stephen Rushmore and Erich Baum, Hotels and Motels – Valuations and Market Studies. (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2001).

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 14

5. Dividing the market for hotel accommodations into individual segments defines specific market characteristics for the types of travelers expected to utilize the area's hotels. The factors investigated include purpose of visit, average length of stay, facilities and amenities required, seasonality, daily demand fluctuations, and price sensitivity. 6. An analysis of existing and proposed competition provides an indication of the current accommodated demand, along with market penetration and the degree of competitiveness. Unless noted otherwise, we have inspected the competitive lodging facilities summarized in this report. 7. Documentation for an occupancy and ADR projection is derived utilizing the build-up approach based on an analysis of lodging activity. 8. A detailed projection of income and expense made in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts for the Lodging Industry sets forth the anticipated economic benefits of the proposed subject property. 9. A feasibility analysis is performed, in which the market equity yield that an investor would expect is compared to the equity yield that an investor must accept.

November-2018 Executive Summary Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 15

2. Description of the Site and Neighborhood

The suitability of the land for the operation of a lodging facility is an important consideration affecting the economic viability of a property and its ultimate marketability. Factors such as size, topography, access, visibility, and the availability of utilities have a direct impact on the desirability of a particular site.

The subject site is located in South Arlington, in the southwest quadrant of the intersection formed by the Interstate 20 frontage road and South Collins Street. This site is in the city of Arlington, Texas.

Physical Characteristics The subject site measures approximately 2.61 acres, or 113,528 square feet. The parcel's adjacent uses are set forth in the following table.

FIGURE 2-1 SUBJECT PARCEL'S ADJACENT USES

Direction Adjacent Use

North Vacant Land East Access Road Easement, Vacant Land South Vacant Land West Arlington Municipal Airport

VIEW OF SUBJECT SITE

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 16

SITE PLAN

Topography and The topography of the site is generally flat, and the shape should permit efficient Site Utility use of the site for building and site improvements, including ingress and egress. Upon completion of construction, the subject site will not contain any significant portion of undeveloped land that could be sold, entitled, and developed for alternate use. It is expected that the site will be developed fully with building and site improvements, thus contributing to the overall profitability of the hotel.

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 17

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

VIEW FROM SITE TO THE NORTH VIEW FROM SITE TO THE SOUTH

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 18

VIEW FROM SITE TO THE EAST VIEW FROM SITE TO THE WEST

Access and Visibility It is important to analyze the site with respect to regional and local transportation routes and demand generators, including ease of access. The subject site is readily accessible to a variety of local and county roads, as well as state and interstate highways.

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 19

MAP OF REGIONAL ACCESS ROUTES

Regional access to/from the city of Arlington and the subject site, in particular, is considered very good. The subject market is served by a variety of additional local highways, which are illustrated on the map.

Primary vehicular access to the subject site will be provided by an access easement road extending from South Collins Street. The subject site is located near a busy intersection and is relatively simple to locate from Interstate 20, which is the nearest major highway. The proposed subject hotel is anticipated to have adequate signage at the street, as well as on its façade. The proposed hotel is expected to benefit from very good visibility within its immediate neighborhood, due to its proposed four-story structure. Overall, the subject site benefits from very good accessibility, and the proposed hotel is expected to enjoy very good visibility from within its local neighborhood.

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 20

Airport Access The proposed subject hotel will be served by the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, which is located approximately 13 miles to the north of the subject site. The proposed subject hotel will also be served by the Dallas Love Field Airport, which is located approximately 16 miles to the northeast of the subject site.

Neighborhood The neighborhood surrounding a lodging facility often has an impact on a hotel's status, image, class, style of operation, and sometimes its ability to attract and properly serve a particular market segment. This section of the report investigates the subject neighborhood and evaluates any pertinent location factors that could affect its future occupancy, average rate, and overall profitability.

The neighborhood surrounding the subject site can be generally described as the Interstate 20 corridor between Cooper Street to the west and State Highway 360 to the east. The neighborhood is characterized by freestanding retail stores and larger retail complexes, such as the Park Mall at Arlington and Arlington Highlands; restaurants; office complexes; automobile dealerships; industrial centers and warehouses; two hospitals; and residential areas. The Arlington Municipal Airport, a "reliever" airport for corporate, cargo, and recreational pilots, is also located in this neighborhood. In general, this neighborhood's growth in recent years has been paced by retail expansions such as a new Duluth Trading Company store and Summit Racing's 700,000-square-foot facility; however, new hotels and other retail centers are also examples of recent development. A opened in January 2017, and a Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott is currently under construction. Finally, General Motors operates three financial centers in the neighborhood, having occupied its newest facility in late 2017. The proposed subject hotel's opening should be a positive influence on the area; the hotel will be in character with and will complement surrounding land uses.

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 21

MAP OF NEIGHBORHOOD

Utilities The subject site will reportedly be served by all necessary utilities.

Soil and Geological and soil reports were not provided to us or made available for our review Subsoil Conditions during the preparation of this report. We are not qualified to evaluate soil conditions other than by a visual inspection of the surface; no extraordinary conditions were apparent.

Nuisances We were not informed of any site-specific nuisances or hazards, and there were no and Hazards visible signs of toxic ground contaminants at the time of our inspection. Because we are not experts in this field, we do not warrant the absence of hazardous waste and urge the reader to obtain an independent analysis of these factors.

Flood Zone According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the subject site is located in flood zone X. The flood zone definition for the X designation is as follows: areas outside the 500-year flood plain; areas of the 500-year flood; areas of the 100-year

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 22

flood with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas less than one square mile and areas protected by levees from the 100-year flood.

Zoning According to the local planning office, the subject property is zoned as follows: APO- CG - General Commercial, Airport Overlay. Additional details pertaining to the proposed subject property’s zoning regulations are summarized in the following table.

FIGURE 2-2 ZONING

Municipality Governing Zoning City of Arlington Current Zoni ng General Commercial, Airport Overlay Current Us e Vacant Land Is Current Use Permitted? Not Applicable Is Change in Zoning Likely? No Permitted Us es Retail, Restaurants, Hotels Hotel Allowed Yes Legally Non-Conforming Not Applicable

Easements and We are not aware of any easements attached to the property that would significantly Encroachments affect the utility of the site or marketability of this project.

Conclusion We have analyzed the issues of size, topography, access, visibility, and the availability of utilities. The subject site is favorably located near the interstate and a major interchange. In general, the site should be well suited for future hotel use, with acceptable access, visibility, and topography for an effective operation.

November-2018 Description of the Site and Neighborhood Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 23

3. Market Area Analysis

The economic vitality of the market area and neighborhood surrounding the subject site is an important consideration in forecasting lodging demand and future income potential. Economic and demographic trends that reflect the amount of visitation provide a basis from which to project lodging demand. The purpose of the market area analysis is to review available economic and demographic data to determine whether the local market will undergo economic growth, stabilize, or decline. In addition to predicting the direction of the economy, the rate of change must be quantified. These trends are then correlated based on their propensity to reflect variations in lodging demand, with the objective of forecasting the amount of growth or decline in visitation by individual market segment (e.g., commercial, meeting and group, and leisure).

Market Area Definition The market area for a lodging facility is the geographical region where the sources of demand and the competitive supply are located. The subject site is located in the city of Arlington, the county of Tarrant, and the state of Texas. Arlington is the seventh-largest city in Texas and is the largest city in the United States without mass transit. The city, which is located twelve miles east of Downtown Fort Worth and 20 miles west of Downtown Dallas, was founded in 1876 along the Texas and Pacific Railroad. Large-scale industrialization began in 1954 with the arrival of a General Motors assembly plant. Automotive and aerospace development gave the city one of the nation's greatest population growth rates between 1950 and 1990. Arlington is home to the Globe Life Park in Arlington, Six Flags Over Texas, Six Flags Hurricane Harbor, The University of Texas at Arlington, and the AT&T Stadium.

The subject property’s market area can be defined by its Combined Statistical Area (CSA): Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK. The CSA represents adjacent metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas that have a moderate degree of employment interchange. Micropolitan statistical areas represent urban areas in the United States based around a core city or town with a population of 10,000 to 49,999; the MSA requires the presence of a core city of at least 50,000 people and a total population of at least 100,000 (75,000 in New England). The following exhibit illustrates the market area.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 24

MAP OF MARKET AREA

Economic and A primary source of economic and demographic statistics used in this analysis is the Demographic Review Complete Economic and Demographic Data Source published by Woods & Poole Economics, Inc.—a well-regarded forecasting service based in Washington, D.C. Using a database containing more than 900 variables for each county in the nation, Woods & Poole employs a sophisticated regional model to forecast economic and demographic trends. Historical statistics are based on census data and information published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Projections are formulated by Woods & Poole, and all dollar amounts have been adjusted for inflation, thus reflecting real change.

These data are summarized in the following table.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 25

FIGURE 3-1 ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA SUMMARY

Average Annual Compounded Change 2000 2010 2016 2020 2000-10 2010-16 2016-20

Resident Population (Thousands) Tarrant County 1,456.9 1,817.7 2,016.9 2,123.5 2.2 % 1.7 % 1.3 % Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA 5,235.4 6,452.7 7,233.3 7,730.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK CSA 5,628.3 6,878.5 7,673.3 8,186.7 2.0 1.8 1.6 State of Texas 20,944.5 25,244.3 27,862.6 29,611.5 1.9 1.7 1.5 United States 282,162.4 309,348.1 323,132.3 335,057.8 0.9 0.7 0.9 Per-Capita Personal Income* Tarrant County $36,669 $39,060 $43,370 $45,574 0.6 1.8 1.2 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA 40,540 39,952 46,123 49,024 (0.1) 2.4 1.5 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK CSA 39,586 39,360 45,441 48,322 (0.1) 2.4 1.5 State of Texas 33,856 37,276 41,768 44,737 1.0 1.9 1.7 United States 36,812 39,622 44,450 47,348 0.7 1.9 1.6 W&P Wealth Index Tarrant County 102.3 101.2 100.1 98.8 (0.1) (0.2) (0.3) Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA 112.7 103.8 106.2 105.8 (0.8) 0.4 (0.1) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK CSA 109.5 101.9 104.2 103.9 (0.7) 0.4 (0.1) State of Texas 93.4 95.4 95.3 95.7 0.2 (0.0) 0.1 United States 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Food and Beverage Sales (Millions)* Tarrant County $2,360 $3,182 $4,256 $4,584 3.0 5.0 1.9 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA 8,138 10,654 14,693 15,998 2.7 5.5 2.2 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK CSA 8,492 11,087 15,273 16,609 2.7 5.5 2.1 State of Texas 27,748 37,635 52,906 57,560 3.1 5.8 2.1 United States 368,829 447,728 582,294 615,384 2.0 4.5 1.4 Total Retail Sales (Millions)* Tarrant County $22,869 $27,725 $34,833 $37,859 1.9 3.9 2.1 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA 80,693 94,010 118,487 130,757 1.5 3.9 2.5 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK CSA 85,514 98,721 124,004 136,665 1.4 3.9 2.5 State of Texas 291,221 341,775 428,825 470,718 1.6 3.9 2.4 United States 3,902,830 4,130,414 4,880,293 5,227,450 0.6 2.8 1.7

* Inflation Adjusted Source: Woods & Poole Economics, Inc.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 26

The U.S. population has grown at an average annual compounded rate of 0.7% from 2010 through 2016. The county’s population has increased at a quicker pace than the nation’s population; the average annual growth rate of 1.7% between 2010 and 2016 reflects a gradually expanding area. Following this population trend, per- capita personal income increased slowly, at 1.8% on average annually for the county between 2010 and 2016. Local wealth indexes have remained stable in recent years, registering a relatively near average 100.1 level for the county in 2016.

Food and beverage sales totaled $4,256 million in the county in 2016, versus $3,182 million in 2010. This reflects a 5.0% average annual change, which is stronger than the 3.0% pace recorded in the prior decade, the latter years of which were adversely affected by the recession. Over the long term, the pace of growth is forecast to moderate to a more sustainable level of 1.9%, which is forecast through 2020. The retail sales sector demonstrated an annual increase of 1.9% registered in the decade 2000 to 2010, followed by an increase of 3.9% in the period 2010 to 2016. An increase of 2.1% average annual change is expected in county retail sales through 2020.

Workforce The characteristics of an area's workforce provide an indication of the type and Characteristics amount of transient visitation likely to be generated by local businesses. Sectors such as finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE); wholesale trade; and services produce a considerable number of visitors who are not particularly rate-sensitive. The government sector often generates transient room nights, but per-diem reimbursement allowances often limit the accommodations selection to budget and mid-priced lodging facilities. Contributions from manufacturing, construction, transportation, communications, and public utilities (TCPU) employers can also be important, depending on the company type.

The following table sets forth the county workforce distribution by business sector in 2000, 2010, and 2016, as well as a forecast for 2020.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 27

FIGURE 3-2 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT (000S)

Average Annual Compounded Change Percent Percent Percent Percent Industry 2000 of Total 2010 of Total 2016 of Total 2020 of Total 2000-2010 2010-2016 2016-2020

Farm 1.5 0.2 % 1.5 0.1 % 1.4 0.1 % 1.6 0.1 % (0.0) % (0.6) % 2.6 % Forestry, Fishing, Related Activities And Other 0.6 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.1 2.7 (0.8) 2.2 Mi ni ng 8.0 0.9 19.7 1.9 26.2 2.2 27.3 2.1 9.5 4.9 1.0 Utilities 1.5 0.2 2.1 0.2 2.3 0.2 2.4 0.2 3.3 1.9 0.9 Construction 54.8 6.2 57.0 5.5 73.1 6.0 82.4 6.3 0.4 4.2 3.0 Manufacturi ng 100.7 11.4 80.4 7.8 86.4 7.1 91.8 7.1 (2.2) 1.2 1.5 Total Trade 147.0 16.7 149.8 14.6 178.1 14.7 193.7 14.9 0.2 2.9 2.1 Wholesale Trade 40.0 4.5 41.9 4.1 53.7 4.4 56.2 4.3 0.5 4.2 1.2 Retail Trade 107.0 12.1 107.9 10.5 124.5 10.3 137.5 10.6 0.1 2.4 2.5 Transportation And Warehousing 66.3 7.5 65.8 6.4 90.0 7.4 90.2 6.9 (0.1) 5.4 0.1 Information 22.2 2.5 17.1 1.7 14.3 1.2 14.6 1.1 (2.6) (2.9) 0.6 Finance And Insurance 44.1 5.0 69.5 6.8 76.9 6.4 83.7 6.4 4.7 1.7 2.1 Real Estate And Rental And Lease 24.7 2.8 40.3 3.9 49.2 4.1 53.8 4.1 5.0 3.4 2.3 Total Services 316.6 35.9 412.1 40.1 493.6 40.8 534.1 41.1 2.7 3.1 2.0 Professional And Technical Services 44.6 5.1 59.2 5.8 65.8 5.4 70.3 5.4 2.9 1.8 1.7 Management Of Companies And Enterprises 3.3 0.4 7.6 0.7 10.6 0.9 11.4 0.9 8.6 5.6 1.8 Administrative And Waste Services 63.4 7.2 74.9 7.3 84.1 7.0 90.2 6.9 1.7 2.0 1.8 Educational Services 10.9 1.2 19.1 1.9 20.3 1.7 21.7 1.7 5.7 1.0 1.8 Health Care And Social Assistance 68.1 7.7 92.9 9.0 117.2 9.7 129.5 10.0 3.2 3.9 2.5 Arts, Entertainment, And Recreation 16.2 1.8 23.5 2.3 26.8 2.2 28.5 2.2 3.8 2.2 1.5 Accommodation And Food Services 62.0 7.0 74.8 7.3 93.7 7.7 100.1 7.7 1.9 3.8 1.7 Other Services, Except Public Administration 48.0 5.4 60.1 5.8 75.2 6.2 82.4 6.3 2.3 3.8 2.3 Total Government 93.4 10.6 112.5 10.9 117.6 9.7 124.3 9.6 1.9 0.7 1.4 Federal Civilian Government 13.8 1.6 15.1 1.5 14.7 1.2 14.6 1.1 0.9 (0.5) (0.1) Federal Military 4.8 0.5 5.1 0.5 5.5 0.5 5.5 0.4 0.5 1.3 0.1 State And Local Government 74.8 8.5 92.3 9.0 97.4 8.1 104.1 8.0 2.1 0.9 1.7

TOTAL 881.2 100.0 % 1,028.4 100.0 % 1,209.9 100.0 % 1,300.6 100.0 % 1.6 % 2.7 % 1.8 %

MSA 3,436.6 — 3,963.1 — 4,792.7 — 5,223.8 — 1.4 % 3.2 % 2.2 % U.S. 165,372.0 — 173,034.7 — 193,668.4 — 208,570.0 — 1.0 1.9 1.9

Source: Woods & Poole Economics, Inc.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 28

Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. reports that during the period from 2000 to 2010, total employment in the county grew at an average annual rate of 1.6%. This trend was above the growth rate recorded by the MSA and also outpaced the national average. More recently, the pace of total employment growth in the county accelerated to 2.7% on an annual average from 2010 to 2016, reflecting the initial years of the recovery.

Of the primary employment sectors, Total Services recorded the highest increase in number of employees during the period from 2010 to 2016, increasing by 81,451 people, or 19.8%, and rising from 40.1% to 40.8% of total employment. Of the various service sub-sectors, Health Care And Social Assistance and Accommodation And Food Services were the largest employers. Strong growth was also recorded in the Total Trade sector, as well as the Transportation And Warehousing sector, which expanded by 18.9% and 7.5%, respectively, in the period 2010 to 2016. Forecasts developed by Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. anticipate that total employment in the county will change by 1.8% on average annually through 2020. The trend is below the forecast rate of change for the U.S. as a whole during the same period.

The following table illustrates historical and projected employment, households, population and average household income data as provided by REIS for the overall Fort Worth market.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 29

FIGURE 3-3 HISTORICAL & PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT, HOUSEHOLDS, POPULATION, AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME STATISTICS

Total Office Industrial Household Year Employment % Chg Employment % Chg Employment % Chg Households % Chg Population % Chg Avg. Income % Chg

2005 851,500 — 232,079 — 148,623 — 739,800 — 2,006,070 — $96,268 — 2006 879,370 3.3 % 239,295 3.1 % 153,837 3.5 % 757,180 2.3 % 2,049,990 2.2 % 101,851 5.8 % 2007 902,700 2.7 245,031 2.4 155,808 1.3 776,460 2.5 2,100,080 2.4 106,223 4.3 2008 903,670 0.1 245,679 0.3 151,490 (2.8) 790,470 1.8 2,147,130 2.2 110,464 4.0 2009 867,070 (4.1) 239,697 (2.4) 138,440 (8.6) 799,970 1.2 2,187,890 1.9 102,640 (7.1) 2010 879,830 1.5 245,259 2.3 140,821 1.7 803,160 0.4 2,221,030 1.5 108,436 5.6 2011 910,330 3.5 254,414 3.7 146,027 3.7 816,830 1.7 2,257,280 1.6 112,493 3.7 2012 938,400 3.1 261,673 2.9 151,947 4.1 831,670 1.8 2,293,380 1.6 120,788 7.4 2013 959,230 2.2 266,478 1.8 153,904 1.3 846,410 1.8 2,327,960 1.5 121,230 0.4 2014 987,570 3.0 270,615 1.6 157,583 2.4 860,040 1.6 2,371,230 1.9 129,750 7.0 2015 998,500 1.1 271,119 0.2 154,702 (1.8) 872,990 1.5 2,419,640 2.0 130,317 0.4 2016 1,014,330 1.6 273,497 0.9 154,421 (0.2) 886,140 1.5 2,466,490 1.9 131,030 0.5 2017 1,038,830 2.4 278,884 2.0 159,277 3.1 902,440 1.8 2,511,970 1.8 134,289 2.5

Forecasts 2018 1,063,250 2.4 % 286,973 2.9 % 161,093 1.1 % 922,460 2.2 % 2,560,940 1.9 % $139,594 4.0 % 2019 1,083,590 1.9 292,454 1.9 162,721 1.0 942,110 2.1 2,608,340 1.9 143,957 3.1 2020 1,097,830 1.3 296,137 1.3 163,378 0.4 960,580 2.0 2,655,230 1.8 147,569 2.5 2021 1,112,490 1.3 300,317 1.4 163,922 0.3 979,900 2.0 2,704,180 1.8 152,590 3.4 2022 1,130,180 1.6 305,700 1.8 164,788 0.5 999,370 2.0 2,754,240 1.9 157,642 3.3

Average Annual Compound Change 2005 - 2017 1.7 % 1.5 % 0.6 % 1.7 % 1.9 % 2.8 % 2005 - 2007 3.0 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.3 5.0 2007 - 2010 (0.9) 0.0 (3.3) 1.1 1.9 0.7 2010 - 2017 2.4 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 5.5 Forecast 2018 - 2022 1.5 % 1.6 % 0.6 % 2.0 % 1.8 % 3.1 %

Source: REIS Report, 2nd Quarter, 2018

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 30

For the Fort Worth market, of the roughly 1,000,000 persons employed, 27% are categorized as office employees, while 15% are categorized as industrial employees. Total employment decreased by an average annual compound rate of -0.9% during the recession of 2007 to 2010, followed by an increase of 2.4% from 2010 to 2017. By comparison, office employment reflected compound change rates of 0.0% and 1.9%, during the same respective periods. Total employment is expected to expand by 2.4% in 2018, while office employment is forecast to expand by 2.9% in 2018. From 2018 through 2022, REIS anticipates that total employment will expand at an average annual compound rate of 1.5%, while office employment will expand by 1.6% on average annually during the same period.

The number of households is forecast to expand by 2.0% on average annually between 2018 and 2022. Population is forecast to expand during this same period, at an average annual compounded rate of 1.8%. Household average income is forecast to grow by 3.1% on average annually from 2018 through 2022.

Radial Demographic The following table reflects radial demographic trends for our market area Snapshot measured by three points of distance from the subject site.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 31

FIGURE 3-4 DEMOGRAPHICS BY RADIUS

0.00 - 1.00 miles 0.00 - 3.00 miles 0.00 - 5.00 miles Population 2023 Projection 9,469 158,812 379,091 2018 Estimate 8,887 148,749 354,098 2010 Census 8,127 134,593 317,417 2000 Census 7,589 113,910 252,524 Percent Change: 2018 to 2023 6.6% 6.8% 7.1% Percent Change: 2010 to 2018 9.4% 10.5% 11.6% Percent Change: 2000 to 2010 7.1% 18.2% 25.7% Households 2023 Projection 3,245 53,322 124,503 2018 Estimate 3,059 50,089 116,894 2010 Census 2,827 45,866 107,033 2000 Census 2,482 39,369 87,950 Percent Change: 2018 to 2023 6.1% 6.5% 6.5% Percent Change: 2010 to 2018 8.2% 9.2% 9.2% Percent Change: 2000 to 2010 13.9% 16.5% 21.7% Income 2018 Est. Average Household Income $66,460 $70,943 $79,565 2018 Est. Median Household Income 58,284 56,817 62,317 2018 Est. Civ. Employed Pop 16+ by Occupation Architecture/Engineering 38 857 2,907 Arts/Design/Entertainment/Sports/Media 72 1,055 2,615 Building/Grounds Cleaning/Maintenance 166 2,703 6,352 Business/Financial Operations 293 3,626 8,775 Community/Social Services 88 949 2,234 Computer/Mathematical 135 1,836 4,577 Construction/Extraction 248 3,739 9,786 Education/Training/Library 232 3,622 10,015 Farming/Fishing/Forestry 4 179 268 Food Preparation/Serving Related 156 4,360 10,118 Healthcare Practitioner/Technician 209 4,269 9,817 Healthcare Support 114 1,661 3,570 Installation/Maintenance/Repair 236 3,086 6,801 Legal 7 410 1,151 Life/Physical/Social Science 4 148 612 Management 326 4,879 13,607 Office/Administrative Support 632 11,701 26,507 Production 227 5,313 11,621 Protective Servi ces 72 1,541 3,796 Sales/Related 564 7,990 19,210 Personal Care/Service 205 2,451 5,455 Transportation/Material Moving 317 6,792 14,944 Source: Environics Analytics

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 32

This source reports a population of 354,098 within a five-mile radius of the subject site, and 116,894 households within this same radius. Average household income within a five-mile radius of the subject site is currently reported at $79,565, while the median is $62,317.

Unemployment The following table presents historical unemployment rates for the proposed Statistics subject hotel’s market area.

FIGURE 3-5 UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS

Year City MSA State U.S. 2008 4.5 % 4.9 % 4.8 % 5.8 % 2009 7.2 7.8 7.6 9.3 2010 8.2 8.1 8.1 9.6 2011 7.6 7.6 7.8 8.9 2012 6.5 6.6 6.7 8.1 2013 6.1 6.1 6.3 7.4 2014 5.0 5.0 5.1 6.2 2015 4.0 4.1 4.4 5.3 2016 3.9 3.9 4.6 4.9 2017 3.7 3.6 4.3 4.4

Recent Month - Aug 2017 3.9 % 3.8 % 4.4 % 4.4 % 2018 3.6 3.6 3.9 3.9

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Current U.S. unemployment levels are now firmly below the annual averages of the last economic cycle peak of 2006 and 2007, when annual averages were 4.6%. National unemployment registered 4.1% each month during the first quarter of 2018, as well as the last quarter of 2017, roughly six points below the October 2009 peak of 10.0%. In August, September, and October of 2018, the rate remained low at 3.9%, 3.7%, and 3.7%, respectively. Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 118,000, 286,000, and 250,000 jobs in August, September, and October of 2018, respectively. Gains in October occurred in the health care, manufacturing, construction, transportation, and warehousing sectors. Unemployment has remained under the 5.0% mark since May 2016, reflecting a trend of relative stability and the overall strength of the U.S. economy. The unemployment rate fell to a 48-year low in September and October.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 33

Locally, the unemployment rate was 3.7% in 2017; for this same area in 2018, the most recent month’s unemployment rate was registered at 3.6%, versus 3.9% for the same month in 2017. Unemployment rose in 2009 as the region entered an economic slowdown, and this trend continued in 2010 as the height of the national recession took hold. However, unemployment declined in 2011 as the economy rebounded, a trend that continued through 2017. The most recent comparative period illustrates a decrease in unemployment, indicated by the lower unemployment rate in the latest available data for 2018. The Dallas/Fort Worth area continues to be one of the top U.S. metropolitan areas for job growth. Moreover, the local unemployment rate is well below the state and national levels. Local employment has been strong within the entertainment industry and at such entities as The University of Texas at Arlington, General Motors Arlington Assembly Plant, and Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital. An abundance of construction activity and robust entertainment and retail sectors should provide strong employment in the market. Our interviews with economic development officials reflect an optimistic outlook.

Major Business and Providing additional context for understanding the nature of the regional economy, Industry the following table presents a list of the major employers in the subject property’s market.

FIGURE 3-6 MAJOR EMPLOYERS

Number of Rank Firm Employees

1 Arlington ISD 8,200 2 University of Texas at Arlington 5,300 3 General Motors Co. 4,484 4 Texas Health Resources 4,063 5 Six Flags Over Texas 3,800 6 The Parks Mall 3,500 7 General Motors Financial 3,300 8 Ci ty of Arl i ngton 2,509 9 JPMorgan Chase 1,965 10 Texas Rangers 1,881

Source: City of Arlington Office of Economic Development, 2017

The entertainment, retail, and tourism industries represent significant sources of revenue and employment for the area. In August 2018, the first phase of Texas Live, a new, $4-billion, public-private partnership, mixed-use development, located between AT&T Stadium and Globe Life Park in Arlington, opened. Globe Life Field,

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 34

the Texas Rangers' new ballpark, will open in 2020. Arlington also boasts numerous shopping venues. In the center of Arlington’s Entertainment District, Lincoln Square offers an outdoor mall that is complemented by restaurants and nightlife options. In South Arlington, the Parks Mall at Arlington combines shopping and entertainment venues, including a menagerie-themed carousel, an NHL-sized ice arena, and an AMC movie theater with stadium-style seating. Nearby, the Arlington Highlands lifestyle center blends office, retail, restaurant, hotel, and entertainment uses. At The University of Texas at Arlington, a $125-million, 220,000-square-foot Science, Engineering Innovation and Research building opened in September 2018. General Motors (GM) operates an assembly plant in Arlington that has been in operation for over 50 years. In October 2018, Bell unveiled its expanded Flight Research Center; this South Arlington facility houses many of the Fort Worth-based newest technology and innovations, including the Bell V-280 Valor, 525 Relentless, V-247 Vigilant and the Autonomous Pod Transport (APT). To the east in Grand Prairie, North Texas' second IKEA furniture store opened in December 2017. The Epic development in Grand Prairie, a massive $75-million water park opened in January 2018. The entertainment industry, complemented by new retail, entertainment, and lodging developments, should remain an important anchor for the Arlington economy.

Office Space Statistics Trends in occupied office space are typically among the most reliable indicators of lodging demand, as firms that occupy office space often exhibit a strong propensity to attract commercial visitors. Thus, trends that cause changes in vacancy rates or occupied office space may have a proportional impact on commercial lodging demand and a less direct effect on meeting demand. The following table details office space statistics for the pertinent market area.

FIGURE 3-7 OFFICE SPACE STATISTICS – MARKET OVERVIEW

Inventory Occupied Office Vacancy Average Asking Submarket Buildings Square Feet Space Rate Lease Rate

1 Southeast 105 5,573,000 4,764,900 14.5 % $18.44 2 Southwest 25 1,742,000 1,512,100 13.2 19.30 3 Northwest 51 3,706,000 3,328,000 10.2 21.55 4 CBD 44 8,375,000 7,353,300 12.2 24.48 5 Northeast 158 6,893,000 4,556,300 33.9 18.58 Totals and Averages 383 26,289,000 21,514,600 18.2 % $20.90 Source: REIS Report, 2nd Quarter, 2018

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 35

The greater Fort Worth market comprises a total of 26.3 million square feet of office space. For the 2nd Quarter of 2018, the market reported a vacancy rate of 18.2% and an average asking rent of $20.90. The subject property is located in the Southeast submarket, which houses 5,573,000 square feet of office space. The submarket's vacancy rate of 14.5% is below the overall market average. The average asking lease rate of $18.44 is below the average for the broader market.

The following table illustrates a trend of office space statistics for the overall Fort Worth market and the Southeast submarket.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 36

FIGURE 3-8 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED OFFICE SPACE STATISTICS – GREATER MARKET VS. SUBMARKET

Fort Worth Market Southeast Submarket Available Occupied Vacancy Asking Available Occupied Vacancy Asking Year Office Space % Chg Office Space % Chg Rate Lease Rate % Chg Office Space % Chg Office Space % Chg Rate Lease Rate % Chg

2005 24,561,000 — 20,705,000 — 15.7 % $17.19 — 5,993,000 — 5,070,000 — 15.4 % $16.19 — 2006 24,530,000 (0.1) % 21,371,000 3.2 % 12.9 18.11 5.4 % 6,013,000 0.3 % 5,189,000 2.3 % 13.7 16.87 4.2 % 2007 24,499,000 (0.1) 21,786,000 1.9 11.1 19.03 5.1 5,774,000 (4.0) 4,908,000 (5.4) 15.0 17.37 3.0 2008 24,915,000 1.7 21,537,000 (1.1) 13.6 19.61 3.0 5,583,000 (3.3) 4,584,000 (6.6) 17.9 17.62 1.4 2009 25,054,000 0.6 20,829,000 (3.3) 16.9 19.12 (2.5) 5,550,000 (0.6) 4,573,000 (0.2) 17.6 17.27 (2.0) 2010 25,003,000 (0.2) 20,682,000 (0.7) 17.3 19.13 0.1 5,538,000 (0.2) 4,585,000 0.3 17.2 16.91 (2.1) 2011 25,206,000 0.8 20,738,000 0.3 17.7 19.27 0.7 5,573,000 0.6 4,715,000 2.8 15.4 17.11 1.2 2012 25,261,000 0.2 20,983,000 1.2 16.9 19.35 0.4 5,573,000 0.0 4,698,000 (0.4) 15.7 17.12 0.1 2013 25,483,000 0.9 21,557,000 2.7 15.4 19.77 2.2 5,573,000 0.0 4,798,000 2.1 13.9 17.57 2.6 2014 25,638,000 0.6 21,582,000 0.1 15.8 20.02 1.3 5,573,000 0.0 4,782,000 (0.3) 14.2 18.03 2.6 2015 25,401,000 (0.9) 21,684,000 0.5 14.6 20.37 1.7 5,573,000 0.0 4,731,000 (1.1) 15.1 18.27 1.3 2016 25,560,000 0.6 21,539,000 (0.7) 15.7 20.52 0.7 5,573,000 0.0 4,793,000 1.3 14.0 18.10 (0.9) 2017 25,908,000 1.4 21,371,000 (0.8) 17.5 20.71 0.9 5,573,000 0.0 4,804,000 0.2 13.8 18.43 1.8

Forecasts 2018 26,339,000 1.7 % 21,530,000 0.7 % 18.3 % $21.04 1.6 % 5,588,000 0.3 % 4,747,000 (1.2) % 15.1 % $18.66 1.2 % 2019 26,569,000 0.9 21,631,000 0.5 18.6 21.37 1.6 5,598,000 0.2 4,675,000 (1.5) 16.5 18.85 1.0 2020 26,693,000 0.5 21,630,000 (0.0) 19.0 21.71 1.6 5,643,000 0.8 4,637,000 (0.8) 17.8 19.04 1.0 2021 26,857,000 0.6 21,628,000 (0.0) 19.5 22.14 2.0 5,701,000 1.0 4,604,000 (0.7) 19.3 19.27 1.2 2022 27,039,000 0.7 21,645,000 0.1 19.9 22.55 1.9 5,769,000 1.2 4,577,000 (0.6) 20.7 19.43 0.8

Average Annual Compound Change 2005 - 2017 0.4 % 0.3 % 1.6 % (0.6) % (0.4) % 1.1 % 2005 - 2007 (0.1) 2.6 5.2 (1.8) (1.6) 3.6 2007 - 2010 0.7 (1.7) 0.2 (1.4) (2.2) (0.9) 2010 - 2017 0.5 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.7 1.2 Forecast 2018 - 2022 0.7 % 0.1 % 1.7 % 0.8 % (0.9) % 1.0 %

Source: REIS Report, 2nd Quarter, 2018

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 37

The inventory of office space in the Fort Worth market increased at an average annual compound rate of 0.4% from 2005 through 2017, while occupied office space expanded at an average annual rate of 0.3% over the same period. During the period of 2005 through 2010, occupied office space expanded at an average annual compound rate of 2.6%. From 2010 through 2013, occupied office space contracted at an average annual compound rate of -1.7%, reflecting the impact of the recession. The onset of the recovery is evident in the 0.5% average annual change in occupied office space from 2013 to 2017. From 2017 through 2022, the inventory of occupied office space is forecast to increase at an average annual compound rate of 0.1%, with available office space expected to increase 0.7%, thus resulting in an anticipated vacancy rate of 19.9% as of 2022. Within Arlington, the majority of the office space is located in North Arlington, although rapid retail growth along the Interstate 20 corridor in South Arlington has prompted the addition of space within the South Arlington submarket.

Convention Activity A convention center serves as a gauge of visitation trends to a particular market. Convention centers also generate significant levels of demand for area hotels and serve as a focal point for community activity. Typically, hotels within the closest proximity to a convention center—up to three miles away—will benefit the most. Hotels serving as headquarters for an event benefit the most by way of premium rates and hosting related banquet events. During the largest of conventions, peripheral hotels may benefit from compression within the city as a whole.

The following table illustrates recent use statistics for this facility.

FIGURE 3-9 CONVENTION CENTER STATISTICS

Percent Number of Percent Year Number of Events Change Delegates Change

2010/11 169 — 237,390 — 2011/12 160 (5.3) % 177,690 (25.1) % 2012/13 165 3.1 188,631 6.2 2013/14 147 (10.9) 170,983 (9.4) 2014/15 156 6.1 172,599 0.9 2015/16 163 4.5 184,039 6.6

Source: Arlington Convention Center

The Arlington Convention Center contains approximately 101,000 square feet of gross space. In November 2018, the center will be rebranded as Esports Stadium Arlington, a dedicated facility serving the unique and technologically advanced

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 38

demands of the esports industry. Situated in the heart of the Entertainment District, the facility is nestled among Globe Life Park in Arlington (home of the Texas Rangers), AT&T Stadium (home of the Cowboys), Six Flags Over Texas, Six Flags Hurricane Harbor, and numerous hotels and restaurants.

It was reported that the convention center has been affected by several regional changes. In addition to groups outgrowing the facility, activity at the center has been affected by the opening of the Gaylord Texan in 2004 and the increased popularity of the Fort Worth Convention Center following the opening of the Omni Convention Hotel in 2009. Furthermore, the opening of the Irving Convention Center in January 2011 has influenced usage trends at the Arlington Convention Center. Per the last two fiscal years of available data, the number of events and delegates increased, supported by the entertainment and retail options in North Arlington; however, usage statistics for 2016/17 and 2017/18 were unavailable upon request at the time of this report. In March 2018, the City of Arlington announced plans to transform the Arlington Convention Center into a state-of-the-art esports arena through a $10-million private-public partnership. The convention center will still be available for other events, such as training groups.

Airport Traffic Airport passenger counts are important indicators of lodging demand. Depending on the type of service provided by a particular airfield, a sizable percentage of arriving passengers may require hotel accommodations. Trends showing changes in passenger counts also reflect local business activity and the overall economic health of the area.

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) is one of the nation's largest airports and serves as headquarters for American Airlines. In February 2011, the $2.7-billion DFW International Airport Terminal Renewal and Improvement Program (TRIP), a seven-year plan to improve Terminals A, B, C, and E, commenced. Additionally, the DART Rail Orange Line connection inside the airport opened in August 2014. The comprehensive renovation of Terminal A was completed in January 2017, and Terminal E was completed in August 2017. Terminal B is still undergoing renovations, which are expected to be completed in 2018. Plans to renovate Terminal C have been placed on hold as the possibility of building a sixth terminal (Terminal F) is considered; officials estimate that construction would span roughly five years if the project were to move forward. In August 2018, the Federal Aviation Administration granted $180 million to DFW to add new perimeter taxiways to eliminate the waiting period required for aircraft to safely cross runways during busy periods. Construction on these new taxiways is expected to start by the end of 2018.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 39

The following table illustrates recent operating statistics for the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, which is the primary airport facility serving the proposed subject hotel’s submarket.

FIGURE 3-10 AIRPORT STATISTICS - DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Passenger Percent Percent Year Traffic Change* Change**

2008 57,093,187 — — 2009 56,030,457 (1.9) % (1.9) % 2010 56,905,600 1.6 (0.2) 2011 57,806,918 1.6 0.4 2012 58,590,633 1.4 0.6 2013 60,436,739 3.2 1.1 2014 63,522,823 5.1 1.8 2015 65,512,471 3.1 2.0 2016 65,598,618 0.1 1.8 2017 67,092,224 2.3 1.8 Year-to-date, Aug 2017 44,821,164 — — 2018 46,824,504 4.5 % —

*Annual average compounded percentage change from the previous year **Annual average compounded percentage change from first year of data

Source: Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport

This facility recorded 67,092,224 passengers in 2017. The change in passenger traffic between 2016 and 2017 was 2.3%. The average annual change during the period shown was 1.8%.

Dallas Love Field Airport is a public airport located northwest of Dallas, Texas. Love Field was the primary airport for Dallas until Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport opened in 1974. Love Field was designated as a Texas State Historical Site in 2003, celebrating 90 years in the aviation industry in 2007. The five-year, $519- million renovation of Love Field, through a joint venture between the City of Dallas and Southwest Airlines, was completed in October 2014. The timing of the capital project's completion coincided with the end of federal restrictions on how far planes can fly from the airport as part of the Wright Amendment. The project included replacing the terminals with a 20-gate concourse; the first twelve gates opened in 2013, while the remaining eight gates opened in early October 2014. Other

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 40

renovation projects included an expanded baggage-claim area, a remodeled lobby, and a new ticketing wing; additionally, a 5,000-space parking garage was completed in October 2018. The airport is primarily served by Southwest Airlines; however, Delta Air Lines has been trying to increase the number of gates it operates because of the continued growth in passenger traffic.

The following table illustrates recent operating statistics for the Dallas Love Field, which is the secondary airport facility serving the proposed subject property’s submarket.

FIGURE 3-11 AIRPORT STATISTICS – DALLAS LOVE FIELD

Passenger Percent Percent Year Traffic Change* Change**

2008 8,060,792 — — 2009 7,744,522 (3.9) % (3.9) % 2010 7,960,809 2.8 (0.6) 2011 7,982,844 0.3 (0.3) 2012 8,173,927 2.4 0.3 2013 8,470,586 3.6 1.0 2014 9,413,706 11.1 2.6 2015 14,497,498 54.0 8.7 2016 15,562,738 7.3 8.6 2017 15,723,617 1.0 7.7 Year-to-date, Aug 2017 10,324,992 — — 2018 10,811,640 4.7 % —

*Annual average compounded percentage change from the previous year **Annual average compounded percentage change from first year of data

Source: Dallas Love Field

Air traffic registered 15,723,617 passengers in 2017. The change in passenger traffic between 2016 and 2017 was 1.0%. The double-digit increases in passenger traffic at Dallas Love Field Airport in 2014 and 2015 were primarily attributed to the addition of Virgin Airlines and increased service by Southwest Airlines following the repeal of the Wright Amendment on October 13, 2014. After the notable increases in 2014 and 2015, growth began to moderate given the size of the airport.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 41

Tourist Attractions The subject market benefits from a variety of tourism and leisure attractions in the area. Leisure demand generators include Six Flags Over Texas, Six Flags Hurricane Harbor, AT&T Stadium, and Globe Life Park in Arlington. Special events also play a role during key weekends, such as events at The University of Texas at Arlington, Texas Ranger games, Dallas Cowboys games, and other events held at AT&T Stadium. AT&T Stadium and Globe Life Park have begun to expand the types and number of events they host through new initiatives. The Dallas metropolitan area features a multitude of professional sports venues that generate demand for area hotels; American Airlines Center in Downtown Dallas hosts the Dallas Mavericks basketball team and the Dallas Stars hockey team, as well as many high-profile concerts, special events, and shows. The 2018 opening of Texas Live and the planned 2020 opening of Globe Life Field should allow Arlington to remain known as the "Entertainment Capital of Texas."

Conclusion This section discussed a wide variety of economic indicators for the pertinent market area. Arlington is experiencing a period of economic strength and expansion, led by the tourism and manufacturing industries, as well as the education and healthcare sectors. The city benefits from established institutions such as The University of Texas at Arlington, as well as a highly popular mix of tourism attractions that continue to drive strong visitation during the summer months. Moreover, many local corporations, such as General Motors, Bell, and American Airlines, are nationally renowned entities. The population and residential housing development continues to grow within the city. Overall, the strengthening economic trend in the Metroplex, as well as new developments within Arlington, should also bode well for this market.

November-2018 Market Area Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 42

4. Supply and Demand Analysis

In the lodging industry, price varies directly, but not proportionately, with demand and inversely, but not proportionately, with supply. Supply is measured by the number of guestrooms available, and demand is measured by the number of rooms occupied; the net effect of supply and demand toward equilibrium results in a prevailing price, or average daily rate (ADR). The purpose of this section is to investigate current supply and demand trends, as indicated by the current competitive market, and to set forth a basis for the projection of future supply and demand growth.

Definition of Subject The subject site is located in the greater Arlington lodging market. Within this Hotel Market greater market, the proposed subject hotel will compete with a smaller set of hotels in South Arlington based on various factors, such as product, price, and brand.

Historical Supply STR is an independent research firm that compiles and publishes data on the lodging and Demand Data industry, routinely used by typical hotel buyers. HVS has ordered and analyzed an STR Trend Report of historical supply and demand data for a group of hotels considered applicable to this analysis for the proposed subject hotel. This information is presented in the following table, along with the market-wide occupancy, average rate, and rooms revenue per available room (RevPAR). RevPAR is calculated by multiplying occupancy by average rate and provides an indication of how well rooms revenue is being maximized.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 43

FIGURE 4-1 HISTORICAL SUPPLY AND DEMAND TRENDS

Average Daily Room Occupied Room Average Year Count Available Room Nights Change Nights Change Occupancy Rate Change RevPAR Change

2008 1,193 435,445 — 301,400 — 69.2 % $57.24 — $39.62 — 2009 1,209 441,301 1.3 % 268,060 (11.1) % 60.7 53.29 (6.9) % 32.37 (18.3) % 2010 1,383 504,887 14.4 316,990 18.3 62.8 55.58 4.3 34.89 7.8 2011 1,391 507,708 0.6 345,445 9.0 68.0 60.63 9.1 41.26 18.2 2012 1,380 503,547 (0.8) 358,922 3.9 71.3 61.14 0.8 43.58 5.6 2013 1,379 503,335 (0.0) 360,567 0.5 71.6 63.67 4.2 45.61 4.7 2014 1,379 503,335 0.0 366,070 1.5 72.7 66.78 4.9 48.57 6.5 2015 1,380 503,580 0.0 370,601 1.2 73.6 71.33 6.8 52.49 8.1 2016 1,389 506,831 0.6 380,545 2.7 75.1 75.82 6.3 56.93 8.5 2017 1,481 540,565 6.7 390,266 2.6 72.2 77.64 2.4 56.05 (1.5) Year-to-Date Through September 2017 1,481 404,313 — 295,553 — 73.1 % $77.23 — $56.45 — 2018 1,481 404,313 0.0 % 293,855 (0.6) % 72.7 79.01 2.3 % 57.43 1.7 %

Average Annual Compounded Change: 2008 - 2011 5.3 % 4.7 % 1.9 % 1.4 % 2011 - 2017 1.1 2.1 4.2 5.2 Competitive Number Year Year Hotels Included in Sample Class Status of Rooms Affiliated Opened

Quality Inn @ Arlington Highlands Mids ca le Cl as s Secondary 128 Feb 2007 Dec 1985 Motel 6 Arl ington Economy Class Secondary 66 Apr 2015 Feb 1995 Studio 6 South Arlington Economy Class Secondary 142 Jan 2001 Apr 1995 & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall Upper Midscale Class Primary 101 Sep 1995 Sep 1995 La Quinta Inns & Suites Dallas Arlington South Mids ca le Cl as s Primary 128 May 1997 Ma y 1997 InTown Suites Arlington I20 Economy Class Secondary 133 May 2002 Dec 1997 Microtel Inn & Suites by Wyndham Dallas Arlington Economy Class Secondary 45 Oct 1998 Oct 1998 InTown Suites Arlington Economy Class Secondary 121 Nov 1998 Nov 1998 Days Inn Arlington Economy Class Secondary 50 Nov 1999 Nov 1999 InTown Suites Arlington South Economy Class Secondary 121 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 Super 8 Arlington East Economy Class Secondary 48 Jun 2001 Jun 2001 Hampton Inn Suites Dallas Arlington South Upper Midscale Class Primary 98 Nov 2007 Nov 2007 Residence Inn Dallas Arlington South Upscale Class Primary 96 Nov 2009 Nov 2009 Courtyard Dallas Arlington South Upscale Class Primary 103 Feb 2010 Feb 2010 Homewood Suites Dallas Arlington South Upscale Class Primary 101 Dec 2016 Dec 2016

Total 1,481

Source: STR

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 44

FIGURE 4-2 HISTORICAL SUPPLY AND DEMAND TRENDS (STR)

600,000 80.0 70.0 500,000 60.0 400,000 50.0 300,000 40.0 30.0

Room Nights Room 200,000 20.0 Occupancy (%) 100,000 10.0 0 0.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Available Room Nights Occupied Room Nights Occupancy

It is important to note some limitations of the STR data. Hotels are occasionally added to or removed from the sample; furthermore, not every property reports data in a consistent and timely manner. These factors can influence the overall quality of the information by skewing the results, and these inconsistencies may also cause the STR data to differ from the results of our competitive survey. Nonetheless, STR data provide the best indication of aggregate growth or decline in existing supply and demand; thus, these trends have been considered in our analysis. Opening dates, as available, are presented for each reporting hotel in the previous table.

The STR data for the competitive set reflect a market-wide occupancy level of 2017 in 72.2%, which compares to 75.1% for 2016. The overall average occupancy level for the calendar years presented equates to 72.7%. The STR data for the competitive set reflect a market-wide ADR level of $77.64 in 2017, which compares to $75.82 For 2016. The average across all calendar years presented for ADR equates to $69.57. These occupancy and average rate trends resulted in a RevPAR level of $56.05 in 2017.

This selected set of competitive hotels achieved a RevPAR of nearly $40 in 2008, before it declined to a low point of roughly $32 by year-end 2009 because of the recession. A recovery began in 2010 that accelerated in 2011 given atypical average rate growth associated with Super Bowl XLV. From 2010 through 2016, both occupancy and average rate registered year-over-year improvements. Limited supply change and the continued expansion of the local economy were largely responsible for this period of growth. This trend reversed in 2017 as supply growth caused occupancy declines despite continued demand gains. Year-to-date 2018 data

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 45

illustrate a minimal softening in occupancy and a roughly $2 gain in average rate. The continued absorption of competitive new supply, combined with the high- quality hotel inventory in South Arlington, has contributed to the latest trend. The near-term outlook is positive; while new hotel supply is expected, continued development in the area should allow for induced demand and the absorption of new supply over the long term.

Competitive Supply The following table summarizes the important operating characteristics of the future primary competitors and the aggregate secondary competitors (if applicable). This information was compiled from personal interviews, inspections, online resources, and our in-house database of operating and hotel facility data.

Primary competitors generally encompass South Arlington’s upper midscale and upscale properties; the interior-corridor midscale La Quinta Inn was also considered a primary competitor. The complement of hotel inventory in the South Arlington market, inclusive of midscale and economy properties, represent the secondary competitive set. Given the large disparity in product quality, brand, and price point between the primary and secondary competitors, the secondary competitors have been weighted minimally competitive in our analysis.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 46

FIGURE 4-3 PRIMARY COMPETITORS – OPERATING PERFORMANCE

Est. Segmentation Estimated 2016 Estimated 2017

Weighted Weighted Annual Annual Number of Room Room Occupancy Yield

Property Rooms Commercial Group Leisure Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR Penetration Penetration

Hilton Garden Inn Dallas Arlington South 132 55 % 25 % 20 % 0 — — — 132 60 - 65 % $120 - $125 $75 - $80 85 - 90 % 100 - 110 %

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 103 65 15 20 103 80 - 85 130 - 140 105 - 110 103 75 - 80 125 - 130 100 - 105 110 - 120 130 - 140

Hampton Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 98 65 15 20 98 75 - 80 115 - 120 90 - 95 98 65 - 70 110 - 115 80 - 85 95 - 100 110 - 120

Holiday Inn Express & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall 101 55 20 25 101 70 - 75 115 - 120 80 - 85 101 65 - 70 110 - 115 75 - 80 90 - 95 100 - 110

La Quinta Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 128 50 25 25 128 70 - 75 90 - 95 65 - 70 128 65 - 70 90 - 95 60 - 65 90 - 95 80 - 85

Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Arlington South 101 65 15 20 9 20 - 25 115 - 120 20 - 25 101 60 - 65 115 - 120 75 - 80 90 - 95 100 - 110

Residence Inn by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 96 70 10 20 96 85 - 90 140 - 150 120 - 125 96 85 - 90 130 - 140 115 - 120 120 - 130 150 - 160

Sub-Totals/Averages 759 61 % 18 % 21 % 535 77.0 % $118.66 $91.36 759 70.8 % $117.45 $83.14 99.6 % 114.4 %

Secondary Competitors 854 50 % 15 % 35 % 214 74.0 % $48.00 $35.52 214 72.0 % $49.25 $35.46 101.3 % 48.8 %

Totals/Averages 1,613 58 % 17 % 24 % 748 76.1 % $99.06 $75.43 973 71.1 % $102.28 $72.67 100.0 % 100.0 % * Specific occupancy and average rate data were utilized in our analysis, but are presented in ranges in the above table for the purposes of confidentiality.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 47

FIGURE 4-4 PRIMARY COMPETITORS – FACILITY PROFILES

Approx. Miles Indoor Number of Year Last Major To Subject Meeting Meeting Space Property Rooms Opened Renovation(s) Property Food and Beverage Outlets Space (SF) per Room Facilities & Amenities Hilton Garden Inn Dallas Arlington South 132 2017 — 0.5 Garden Grill & Bar 5,040 38.2 Business Center; Guest Laundry Area; Indoor Swimming Pool; Fitness Center; 521 East Interstate 20 Market Pantry; Outdoor Patio & Fire Pit

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 103 2010 2017 1.4 The Bistro 2,256 21.9 Guest Laundry Area; Outdoor Swimming Pool; Fitness Center; Lobby 711 Highlander Boulevard Workstation; Market Pantry; Outdoor Patio & Fire Pit

Hampton Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 98 2007 2018 0.3 Breakfast Dining Area 1,456 14.9 Business Center; Guest Laundry Area; Outdoor Swimming Pool; Fitness Room; 1100 East Interstate 20 Ma rket Pa ntry

Holiday Inn Express & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall 101 1995 2018 2.6 Breakfast Dining Area 900 8.9 Guest Laundry Area; Outdoor Swimming Pool; Fitness Room; Lobby Workstation; 1721 Pleasant Place Market Pantry; Outdoor Whirlpool

La Quinta Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 128 1997 2013 1.8 Breakfast Dining Area 700 5.5 Guest Laundry Area; Outdoor Swimming Pool; Fitness Room; Lobby Workstation; 4001 Scots Legacy Drive Courtyard; Outdoor Whirlpool

Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Arlington South 101 2016 — 0.2 Compl imenta ry Servi ces Area 1,359 13.5 Business Center; Guest Laundry Area; Outdoor Swimming Pool; Fitness Room; 4550 Waxwing Drive Market Pantry; Outdoor Patio & Barbecue Area; Putting Green

Residence Inn by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 96 2009 2017 1.5 Compl imenta ry Servi ces Area 1,024 10.7 Guest Laundry Area; Indoor Swimming Pool; Indoor Whirlpool; Fitness Room; 801 Highlander Boulevard Lobby Workstation; Market Pantry; Sport Court; Outdoor Patio & Barbecue Area; Outdoor Patio & Fire Pit

FIGURE 4-5 SECONDARY COMPETITOR(S) – OPERATING PERFORMANCE

Est. Segmentation Estimated 2016 Estimated 2017

Weighted Weighted Total Annual Annual Number of Competitive Room Room

Property Rooms Commercial Group Leisure Level Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR Count Occ. Average Rate RevPAR

Secondary Competitors 854 50 % 15 % 35 % 25 % 214 70 - 75 % $45 - $50 $35 - $40 214 70 - 75 % $45 - $50 $35 - $40 Aggregate

Totals/Averages 854 50 % 15 % 35 % 25 % 214 74.0 % $48.00 $35.52 214 72.0 % $49.25 $35.46 * Specific occupancy and average rate data was utilized in our analysis, but is presented in ranges in the above table for the purposes of confidentiality.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 48

The following map illustrates the locations of the proposed subject hotel and its future competitors.

MAP OF COMPETITION

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 49

Supply Changes It is important to consider any new hotels that may have an impact on the proposed subject hotel’s operating performance. The hotels that have recently opened, are under construction, or are in the stages of early development (if any) in the Arlington and Grand Prairie market areas noted below.

FIGURE 4-6 AREA DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY

Estimated Expected Number of Qtr. & Year ProposProposed ed Hotel Hotel Name Rooms0 Hotel Product Tier Development Stage of Opening Address

South Arlington Hilton Garden Inn Arlington 132 Upscale Recently Opened Q1 '17 521 East Interstate 20, Arlington, TX Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriott 110 Upper-Midscale Under Construction Q1 '19 4251 South Collins Street, Arlington, TX Proposed SpringHill Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 131 Upscale Approved Q3 '19 3900 South Collins Street, Arlington, TX Proposed TownePlace Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 100 Upscale Approved Q3 '19 3900 South Collins Street, Arlington, TX Proposed Aloft South Arlington 124 Upscale Early Development Q2 '20 SWQ Interstate 20 and South Collins Street, Arlington, TX Propos ed Tru by Hi l ton 95 Mi dsca l e Early Development Q3 '20 SEQ Interstate 20 and Centreway Place, Arlington, TX Proposed 98 Upper-Midscale Early Development Q3 '20 SEQ Interstate 20 and Centreway Place, Arlington, TX

North Arlington Proposed Aloft Dallas Arlington Entertainment District 136 Upscale Under Construction Q1 '19 2140 East Lamar Boulevard, Arlington, TX Proposed Loews Hotel at Texas! Live 304 Upscale Under Construction Q1 '19 Texas Live!, Arlington, TX Propos ed Drury Hotel 268 Upper-Midscale On Hold — Lincoln Square West, Arlington, TX

Grand Prairie Home2 Suites by Hilton Grand Prairie 96 Upper-Midscale Recently Opened Q3 '16 2123 West Interstate 20, Grand Prairie, TX Comfort Suites Grand Prairie 91 Upper-Midscale Recently Opened Q4 '17 702 Paddock Way, Grand Prairie, TX Proposed Place Grand Prairie 100 Upper-Midscale Under Construction Q3 '19 Sara Jane Parkway, Grand Prairie, TX Proposed Grand Prairie 112 Upscale Approved Q1 '20 Lake Ridge Parkway/Interstate 20, Grand Prairie, TX Proposed Grand Prairie 98 Upper-Midscale Under Construction Q3 '19 1520 North State Highway 360, Grand Prairie, TX Propos ed Courtyard by Ma rri ott Gra nd Pra i ri e 120 Upscale Early Development Q1 '20 Arkansas Lane & President George Bush Turnpike, Grand Prairie, TX Proposed Hotel Grand Prairie Entertainment District 115 Upscale Rumored Q1 '20 Grand Prairie Entertainment District, Grand Prairie, TX

Of the hotels listed in the preceding table, we have identified the following new supply that is expected to have some degree of competitive interaction with the proposed subject hotel, based on location, anticipated market orientation and price point, and/or operating profile.

FIGURE 4-7 NEW SUPPLY

Total Weighted Number Competitive Room Estimated Opening Proposed Property of Rooms Level Count Date Developer Development Stage

Proposed Subject Property 124 100 % 124 June 1, 2020 Stonewood Hotels Early Development Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriott 110 100 110 January 1, 2019 Chase Hospitality LLC Under Construction Proposed SpringHill Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 131 100 131 September 1, 2019 Q Hotels Approved Proposed TownePlace Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 100 100 100 September 1, 2019 Q Hotels Approved Proposed Tru by Hilton 95 75 71 September 1, 2020 Champion Hotels and Development Early Development Proposed Home2 Suites by Hilton 98 75 74 September 1, 2020 Champion Hotels and Development Early Development

Totals/Averages 658 610

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 50

A Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott is under construction near the subject site, while a proposed dual-branded SpringHill Suites by Marriott/TownePlace Suites by Marriott will be located within one mile of the proposed subject hotel. Although the Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott is expected to operate at a lower price point, and the dual-branded hotel will offer a larger guestroom count and more extensive amenities, these hotels are expected to be fully competitive due to the limited high- quality select- and full-service hotels in South Arlington. A Tru by Hilton and a Home2 Suites by Hilton have been proposed for development on a site roughly three-quarters of a mile to the west of the subject site, near Interstate 20 and Centreway Place. While these projects would also be expected to compete directly with the subject hotel, the competitive weight of these projects has been reduced to account for their more speculative nature when compared to the remaining hotels.

While we have taken reasonable steps to investigate proposed hotel projects and their status, due to the nature of real estate development, it is impossible to determine with certainty every hotel that will be opened in the future, or what their marketing strategies and effect in the market will be. Depending on the outcome of current and future projects, the future operating potential of the proposed subject hotel may be affected. Future improvement in market conditions will raise the risk of increased competition. Our forthcoming forecast of stabilized occupancy and average rate is intended to reflect such risk.

Supply Conclusion We have identified various properties that are expected to be competitive to some degree with the proposed subject hotel. We have also investigated potential increases in competitive supply in this Arlington submarket. The Proposed Aloft South Arlington should enter a dynamic market of varying product types and price points. Next, we will present our forecast for demand change, using the historical supply data presented as a starting point.

DEMAND The following table presents the most recent trends for the subject hotel market as tracked by HVS. These data pertain to the competitors discussed previously in this section; performance results are estimated, rounded for the competition, and in some cases weighted if there are secondary competitors present. In this respect, the information in the table differs from the previously presented STR data and is consistent with the supply and demand analysis developed for this report.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 51

FIGURE 4-8 HISTORICAL MARKET TRENDS

Accommodated Room Nights Market Market Year Room Nights % Change Available % Change Occupancy Market ADR % Change RevPAR % Change Est. 2015 203,240 — 269,826 — 75.3 % $94.37 — $71.08 — Est. 2016 207,902 2.3 % 273,049 1.2 % 76.1 99.06 5.0 % 75.43 6.1 % Est. 2017 252,205 21.3 354,963 30.0 71.1 102.28 3.2 72.67 (3.7)

Avg. Annual Compounded Chg., Est. 2015-Est. 2017: 11.4 % 14.7 % 4.1 % 1.1 %

Demand Analysis For the purpose of demand analysis, the overall market is divided into individual Using Market segments based on the nature of travel. Based on our fieldwork, area analysis, and Segmentation knowledge of the local lodging market, we estimate the 2017 distribution of accommodated-room-night demand as follows.

FIGURE 4-9 ACCOMMODATED-ROOM-NIGHT DEMAND

Marketwide Accommodated Percentage Market Segment Demand of Total

Commercia l 146,792 58 % Group 43,775 17 Leisure 61,639 24

Total 252,205 100 %

FIGURE 4-10 MARKET-WIDE ACCOMMODATED-ROOM-NIGHT DEMAND

24%

17% 58%

Commercial Group Leisure

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 52

The market’s demand mix comprises commercial demand, with this segment representing roughly 58% of the accommodated room nights in this Arlington submarket. The group segment comprises 17% of the total, with the final portions leisure in nature, reflecting 24%.

The purpose of segmenting the lodging market is to define each major type of demand, identify customer characteristics, and estimate future growth trends. Starting with an analysis of the local area, three segments were defined as representing the proposed subject hotel’s lodging market. Various types of economic and demographic data were then evaluated to determine their propensity to reflect changes in hotel demand. Based on this procedure, we forecast the following average annual compounded market-segment growth rates.

FIGURE 4-11 AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUNDED MARKET-SEGMENT GROWTH RATES

Annual Growth Rate Market Segment 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Commerci a l 5.0 % 15.0 % 20.0 % 7.5 % 3.5 % 2.0 % Group 2.5 10.0 15.0 5.0 3.0 1.5 Leisure 2.0 7.5 10.0 5.0 2.5 1.0

Base Demand Growth 3.8 % 12.3 % 16.9 % 6.5 % 3.2 % 1.7 %

Latent Demand A table presented earlier in this section illustrated the accommodated-room-night demand in the subject property’s competitive market. Because this estimate is based on historical occupancy levels, it includes only those hotel rooms that were used by guests. Latent demand reflects potential room-night demand that has not been realized by the existing competitive supply, further classified as either unaccommodated demand or induced demand.

Unaccommodated Unaccommodated demand refers to individuals who are unable to secure Demand accommodations in the market because all the local hotels are filled. These travelers must defer their trips, settle for less desirable accommodations, or stay in properties located outside the market area. Because this demand did not yield occupied room nights, it is not included in the estimate of historical accommodated- room-night demand. If additional lodging facilities are expected to enter the market, it is reasonable to assume that these guests will be able to secure hotel rooms in the future, and it is therefore necessary to quantify this demand.

Unaccommodated demand is further indicated if the market is at all seasonal, with distinct high and low seasons; such seasonality indicates that although year-end occupancy may not average in excess of 70%, the market may sell out certain nights

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 53

during the year. To evaluate the incidence of unaccommodated demand in the market, we have reviewed the average occupancy by the night of the week for the past twelve months for the competitive set, as reflected in the STR data. This is set forth in the following table.

FIGURE 4-12 OCCUPANCY BY NIGHT OF THE WEEK

Month Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total Month Oct - 17 70.2 % 67.1 % 71.4 % 72.0 % 68.0 % 78.6 % 86.0 % 73.0 % Nov - 17 70.3 62.8 67.0 72.3 74.8 75.5 77.1 71.5 Dec - 17 57.5 58.8 59.8 61.5 62.3 74.0 72.0 64.1 Jan - 18 52.0 57.9 63.5 63.3 60.8 67.1 68.2 61.8 Feb - 18 58.0 64.0 71.1 73.7 67.9 72.5 77.0 69.2 Mar - 18 61.7 73.1 78.5 76.6 71.6 79.3 81.1 74.8 Apr - 18 56.0 67.2 74.9 76.4 74.1 83.1 86.3 73.2 May - 18 61.9 68.2 73.0 74.0 73.3 84.4 86.7 74.4 Jun - 18 70.1 78.8 82.0 81.9 79.2 84.1 86.8 80.8 Jul - 18 68.1 76.9 81.5 80.9 81.0 83.3 84.5 79.1 Aug - 18 60.3 68.5 72.3 71.4 68.9 71.8 78.1 70.2 Sep - 18 69.7 63.1 71.5 69.8 66.9 71.0 80.3 70.6 Average 63.1 % 67.2 % 72.2 % 72.6 % 70.8 % 77.1 % 80.3 % 71.9 %

Source: STR

The following table presents our estimate of unaccommodated demand in the subject market.

FIGURE 4-13 UNACCOMMODATED DEMAND ESTIMATE

Accommodated Room Unaccommodated Unaccommodated Market Segment Night Demand Demand Percentage Room Night Demand

Commerci a l 146,792 0.3 % 488 Group 43,775 4.7 2,073 Leisure 61,639 5.3 3,293

Total 252,205 2.3 % 5,854

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 54

Accordingly, we have forecast unaccommodated demand equivalent to 2.3% of the base-year demand, resulting from our analysis of monthly and weekly peak demand and sell-out trends.

Induced Demand Induced demand represents the additional room nights that are expected to be attracted to the market following the introduction of a new demand generator. Situations that can result in induced demand include the opening of a new manufacturing plant, the expansion of a convention center, or the addition of a new hotel with a distinct chain affiliation or unique facilities. Although increases in demand are expected in the local market, we have accounted for this growth in the determination of market-segment growth rates rather than induced demand.

Accommodated Based upon a review of the market dynamics in the proposed subject hotel’s Demand and Market- competitive environment, we have forecast growth rates for each market segment. wide Occupancy Using the calculated potential demand for the market, we have determined market- wide accommodated demand based on the inherent limitations of demand fluctuations and other factors in the market area.

The following table details our projection of lodging demand growth for the subject market, including the total number of occupied room nights and any residual unaccommodated demand in the market.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 55

FIGURE 4-14 FORECAST OF MARKET OCCUPANCY

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Commercial Base Demand 154,131 177,251 212,701 228,654 236,657 241,390 Unaccommodated Demand 512 589 707 760 786 802 Total Demand 154,644 177,840 213,408 229,414 237,443 242,192 Growth Rate 5.3 % 15.0 % 20.0 % 7.5 % 3.5 % 2.0 %

Group Base Demand 44,869 49,356 56,759 59,597 61,385 62,306 Unaccommodated Demand 2,125 2,337 2,688 2,823 2,907 2,951 Total Demand 46,994 51,693 59,447 62,420 64,292 65,257 Growth Rate 7.4 % 10.0 % 15.0 % 5.0 % 3.0 % 1.5 %

Leisure Base Demand 62,872 67,587 74,346 78,063 80,015 80,815 Unaccommodated Demand 3,359 3,610 3,971 4,170 4,274 4,317 Total Demand 66,230 71,197 78,317 82,233 84,289 85,132 Growth Rate 7.4 % 7.5 % 10.0 % 5.0 % 2.5 % 1.0 %

Totals Base Demand 261,872 294,194 343,806 366,314 378,057 384,511 Unaccommodated Demand 5,996 6,537 7,366 7,752 7,968 8,070 Total Demand 267,868 300,731 351,173 374,067 386,024 392,581 less: Residual Demand 5,996 4,530 1,784 0 0 0 Total Accommodated Demand 261,872 296,201 349,389 374,067 386,024 392,581 Overall Demand Growth 3.8 % 13.1 % 18.0 % 7.1 % 3.2 % 1.7 % Market Mix Commerci a l 57.7 % 59.1 % 60.8 % 61.3 % 61.5 % 61.7 % Group 17.5 17.2 16.9 16.7 16.7 16.6 Leisure 24.7 23.7 22.3 22.0 21.8 21.7 Existing Hotel Supply 973 973 973 973 973 973 Proposed Hotels Proposed Subject Property ¹ 73 124 124 124 Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriott ² 110 110 110 110 110 Proposed SpringHill Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) ³ 44 131 131 131 131 Proposed TownePlace Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 4 33 100 100 100 100 Proposed Tru by Hilton 5 24 71 71 71 Proposed Home2 Suites by Hilton 6 25 74 74 74

Available Room Nights per Year 354,963 423,295 523,623 577,521 577,521 577,521 Nights per Year 365 365 365 365 365 365 Total Supply 973 1,160 1,435 1,582 1,582 1,582 Rooms Supply Growth 0.0 % 19.3 % 23.7 % 10.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Marketwide Occupancy 73.8 % 70.0 % 66.7 % 64.8 % 66.8 % 68.0 %

¹ Opening in June 2020 of the 100% competitive, 124-room Proposed Subject Property ² Opening in January 2019 of the 100% competitive, 110-room Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriott ³ Opening in September 2019 of the 100% competitive, 131-room Proposed SpringHill Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 4 Opening in September 2019 of the 100% competitive, 100-room Proposed TownePlace Suites by Marriott (Dual-Brand) 5 Opening in September 2020 of the 75% competitive, 95-room Proposed Tru by Hilton 6 Opening in September 2020 of the 75% competitive, 98-room Proposed Home2 Suites by Hilton

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 56

The defined competitive market of hotels should experience continued demand growth over the next few years as key industries continue to strengthen, and South Arlington’s newer hotel inventory attracts demand from older North Arlington hotels. Occupancy is expected to fluctuate due to new supply planned for the area. Based on historical occupancy levels in this market, and taking into consideration typical supply and demand cyclicality, market occupancy is forecast to stabilize in the high-60s, below prior peaks but above the 2017 national average.

November-2018 Supply and Demand Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 57

5. Description of the Proposed Improvements

The quality of a lodging facility's physical improvements has a direct influence on marketability, attainable occupancy, and average room rate. The design and functionality of the structure can also affect operating efficiency and overall profitability. This section investigates the subject property's proposed physical improvements and personal property in an effort to determine how they are expected to contribute to attainable cash flows.

Project Overview The Proposed Aloft South Arlington will be a select-service lodging facility containing 124 rentable units. The four-story property will open on June 1, 2020.

The proposed hotel represents the second Aloft hotel in the city of Arlington. The Aloft Hotels brand is described as one that provides the next generation of business and leisure travelers with a differentiated alternative to commodity lodging. Aloft was conceptualized through the success of 's W hotel brand to create a hotel experience that offers modern design and accessible technology, along with comfort and convenience. Now part of the Marriott portfolio of brands, the Aloft Hotels brand incorporates urban loft-like rooms, stylish furnishings, comfortable public areas designed to foster social interaction, and an innovative approach to hotel food and beverage operations. As of year-end 2017, there were 97 Aloft properties (14,565 rooms) in operation across North America. The brand achieved an overall occupancy of 76.1% and an average daily rate of $136.39, resulting in an average RevPAR level of $103.84, for its North American properties in 2016. While individual brand statistics for 2017 were not available, Marriott reported an overall occupancy of 71.1% and an average daily rate of $129.02 for its North American limited- and select-service hotels (as a composite), resulting in an average RevPAR level of $91.73, for 2017.

RENDERING OF EXTERIOR

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 58

Summary of the Based on information provided by the proposed subject hotel’s development Facilities representatives, the following table summarizes the facilities that are expected to be available at the proposed subject hotel.

FIGURE 5-1 PROPOSED FACILITIES SUMMARY

Guestroom Configuration Number of Units King 70 Queen/Queen 54 Total 124

Food & Beverage Facilities

w xyz Bar

Indoor Meeting & Banquet Facilities Square Footage Tactic Meeting Room 785

Amenities & Services Outdoor Pool Business Center Outdoor patio Market Pantry Fitness Room Guest Laundry Room

Infrastructure Parking Spaces 126 Elevators 2 Guest Life-Safety Systems Sprinklers, Smoke Detectors Cons tructi on Detai ls Wood Frame on Concrete Slab

The proposed hotel will comprise one four-story building. Surface parking will be located around the hotel building. Other site improvements will include freestanding signage, located at the main entrance to the site, as well as landscaping and sidewalks. Additional signage is expected to be placed on the exterior of the building. The hotel's main entrance will lead directly into the lobby, and the first (ground) floor will house the public areas and the back-of-the-house space. Guestrooms are planned to be located on all floors. The site and building components are expected to be normal for a hotel of this type and should meet the standards for this South Arlington submarket.

The hotel will feature its signature w xyz bar within the lobby's "re:mix" area. The hotel is expected to offer one meeting room, which will be located on the first floor. The hotel is planned to offer an outdoor pool, a patio area with lounge seating, and

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 59

a fitness room as recreational facilities. The hotel will offer a 24-hour, self-serve, grab-and-go gourmet eatery, known as "re:fuel." Other amenities are expected to include a business center and a guest laundry room. The hotel will feature standard guestroom configurations and the typical in-room amenities associated with the Aloft brand. Guestroom bathrooms should be of a standard size, with a shower-in- tub or shower stall, a commode, and a single sink with vanity area, featuring a stone countertop. Overall, the facilities should be appropriate for a hotel of this type, and we assume that they will meet brand standards.

The hotel will be served by the necessary back-of-the-house space, including an in- house laundry facility, administrative offices, and a prep kitchen to service the needs of the food and beverage operation. These spaces should be adequate for a hotel of this type and should allow for the efficient operation of the property under competent management.

TYPICAL ALOFT HOTELS LOBBY

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 60

TYPICAL ALOFT HOTELS RE:FUEL AREA

TYPICAL ALOFT HOTELS BAR AREA

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 61

TYPICAL ALOFT HOTELS LOUNGE AREA

TYPICAL ALOFT HOTELS GUESTROOM

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 62

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 63

GUESTROOM FLOOR PLAN

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 64

ADA and We assume that the property will be built according to all pertinent codes and brand Environmental standards. Moreover, we assume its construction will not create any environmental hazards (such as mold) and that the property will fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Capital Expenditures Our analysis assumes that, after its opening, the hotel will require ongoing upgrades and periodic renovations in order to maintain its competitive level in this market and to remain compliant with brand standards. These costs should be adequately funded by the forecasted reserve for replacement, as long as a successful, ongoing preventive-maintenance program is employed by hotel staff.

Construction Budget The construction budget for the 124-room subject hotel, as provided by the project developer, is illustrated in the following table.

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 65

FIGURE 5-2 SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSTRUCTION BUDGET

Component Cost Cost per Room Hard Costs & Site Improvements Trade Costs $6,400,000 $51,613 General Conditions 1,000,000 8,065 Conti ngency 725,000 5,847 Interior Signage 50,000 403 Exterior Signage 100,000 806 Subtotal Hard Cost & Site Improvements $8,275,000 $66,734 FF&E and OS&E Guestrooms FF&E $1,500,000 $12,097 Guestroom Corridors FF&E $125,000 1,008 Publ i c Spa ce FF&E 200,000 1,613 Guestrooms OS&E 300,000 2,419 Publ i c Spa ce OS&E 100,000 806 Heart of House OS&E 100,000 806 Food and Beverage OS&E 100,000 806 Information Technology 250,000 2,016 Laundry Equipment 75,000 605 Ki tchen Equi pment 125,000 1,008 Subtotal FFE & OS&E 2,875,000 $23,185 Pre-Opening Costs and Working Capital Building Permits $100,000 $806 Municipal & Utility Fees 50,000 403 General Liability Insurance 40,000 323 Builder's Risk Insurance 60,000 484 Working Capital 500,000 4,032 Interest Reserve 500,000 4,032 Project Ma nagement 200,000 1,613 Development Fees 600,000 4,839 Subtotal Pre-Opening and Working Capital $2,050,000 $16,532 Soft Costs Architect/ID/Structural, Civil & MEP Engineers $250,000 $2,016 Testing/Inspections 100,000 806 Legal & Accounting 250,000 2,016 Subtotal Soft Costs $600,000 $4,839 Subtotal (without Land and Developer's Fee) $13,800,000 $111,290

Site Cost $1,200,000 $9,677

Total (without Developer's Fee) $15,000,000 $120,968

Conclusion Overall, the proposed subject hotel should offer a well-designed, functional layout of support areas and guestrooms. All typical and market-appropriate features and amenities appear to be included in the hotel's design. We assume that the building

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 66

will be fully open and operational on the stipulated opening date and will meet all local building codes and brand standards. Furthermore, we assume that the hotel staff will be adequately trained to allow for a successful opening and that pre- marketing efforts will have introduced the product to major local accounts at least six months in advance of the opening date.

November-2018 Description of the Proposed Improvements Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 67

6. Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate

Along with ADR results, the occupancy levels achieved by a hotel are the foundation of the property's financial performance and market value. Most of a lodging facility's other revenue sources (such as food, beverages, other operated departments, and rentals and other income) are driven by the number of guests, and many expense levels vary with occupancy. To a certain degree, occupancy attainment can be manipulated by management. For example, hotel operators may choose to lower rates in an effort to maximize occupancy. Our forecasts reflect an operating strategy that we believe would be implemented by a typical, professional hotel management team to achieve an optimal mix of occupancy and average rate.

Forecast of Subject The proposed subject hotel's occupancy forecast is set forth as follows, with the Property’s Occupancy adjusted projected penetration rates used as a basis for calculating the amount of captured market demand.

November-2018 Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 68

FIGURE 6-1 FORECAST OF SUBJECT PROPERTY'S OCCUPANCY

Market Segment 2020 2021 2022 2023

Commercial Demand 213,237 229,414 237,443 242,192 Ma rket Share 4.7 % 8.0 % 8.3 % 8.4 % Ca pture 9,927 18,294 19,658 20,239 Penetration 92 % 102 % 106 % 107 %

Group Demand 58,796 62,420 64,292 65,257 Ma rket Share 4.8 % 8.0 % 8.7 % 8.8 % Ca pture 2,795 5,021 5,621 5,757 Penetration 94 % 103 % 112 % 113 %

Leisure Demand 77,355 82,233 84,289 85,132 Ma rket Share 4.9 % 7.8 % 8.2 % 8.3 % Ca pture 3,791 6,451 6,908 7,050 Penetration 97 % 100 % 105 % 106 %

Total Room Nights Captured 16,513 29,767 32,187 33,045 Available Room Nights 26,536 45,260 45,260 45,260 Subject Occupancy 62 % 66 % 71 % 73 % Market-wide Available Room Nights 523,623 577,521 577,521 577,521 Fair Share 5 % 8 % 8 % 8 % Market-wide Occupied Room Nights 349,389 374,067 386,024 392,581 Market Share 5 % 8 % 8 % 8 % Market-wide Occupancy 67 % 65 % 67 % 68 % Total Penetration 93 % 102 % 106 % 107 %

Within the commercial segment, the proposed subject hotel’s occupancy penetration is positioned above the market-average level. This is supported by its operation as an upscale select-service hotel, its Marriott brand affiliation, and its contemporary design and décor. The proposed subject hotel's occupancy penetration in the leisure segment is also positioned above the market-average level given the proposed hotel's offerings of the w xyz bar and indoor lounge area, spacious outdoor seating area, and outdoor pool with sundeck. Within the group segment, the proposed subject hotel's occupancy penetration is positioned appropriately within the range of existing competitors, below the market-average level, given that the proposed subject hotel's modestly sized meeting room.

November-2018 Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 69

These positioned segment penetration rates result in the following market segmentation forecast.

FIGURE 6-2 MARKET SEGMENTATION FORECAST – SUBJECT PROPERTY

2020 2021 2022 2023

Commerci a l 60 % 61 % 61 % 61 % Group 17 17 17 17 Leisure 23 22 21 21

Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

FIGURE 6-3 STABILIZED MARKET SEGMENTATION– SUBJECT PROPERTY

22%

17% 61%

Commercial Group Leisure

Based on our analysis of the proposed subject hotel and market area, we have selected a stabilized occupancy level of 72%. The stabilized occupancy is intended to reflect the anticipated results of the property over its remaining economic life, given all changes in the life cycle of the hotel. Thus, the stabilized occupancy excludes from consideration any abnormal relationship between supply and demand, as well as any nonrecurring conditions that may result in unusually high or low occupancies. Although the proposed subject hotel may operate at occupancies above this stabilized level, we believe it equally possible for new

November-2018 Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 70

competition and temporary economic downturns to force the occupancy below this selected point of stability.

Average Rate Analysis The following table illustrates the projected average rate and the growth rates assumed. As a context for the average rate growth factors, note that we have applied underlying inflation rates of 2.5%, 2.5%, and 3.0% thereafter for each respective year following the base year of 2017. This final forecast reflects years beginning on June 1, 2020 and corresponds with our financial projections.

FIGURE 6-4 MARKET AND SUBJECT PROPERTY AVERAGE RATE FORECAST

Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Ma rket ADR $102.28 $104.83 $106.93 $109.07 $111.80 $115.15 $118.61 $122.16 $125.83 Projected Market ADR Growth Rate — 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

Proposed Subject Property ADR (As-If Stabilized) $115.00 $117.88 $120.23 $122.64 $125.70 $129.47 $133.36 $137.36 $141.48 ADR Growth Rate — 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%

Proposed Subject Stabilized ADR Penetration 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112% 112.4%

Fiscal Year 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26

Proposed Subject Property Average Rate $123.91 $127.26 $131.08 $135.01 $139.06 $143.24 Opening Discount 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Average Rate After Discount $121.43 $125.99 $131.08 $135.01 $139.06 $143.24 Real Average Rate Growth — 3.8% 4.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Ma rket ADR $110.20 $113.18 $116.58 $120.08 $123.68 $127.39 Proposed Subject ADR Penetration (After Discount) 110% 111% 112% 112% 112% 112% ADR Expressed in Base-Year Dollars Deflated @ Inflation Rate $112.21 $113.04 $114.18 $114.18 $114.18 $114.18

The South Arlington market should experience rate growth through the near term; however, continued supply increases will limit significant growth. The proposed subject hotel's rate position should reflect growth similar to market trends because of the proposed hotel's new facility, strong brand affiliation, and location proximate to retail and restaurants. The proposed subject hotel’s ADR penetration level is forecast to reach 112.4 % by the stabilized period, consistent with our stabilized ADR positioning. Discounts of 2% and 1% have been applied to the stabilized room rates projected for the first two years of operation, as would be expected for a new property of this type as it builds its reputation and becomes established in the market.

The following occupancies and average rates will be used to project the subject property's rooms revenue; this forecast reflects years beginning on June 1, 2020, which correspond with our financial projections.

November-2018 Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 71

FIGURE 6-5 FORECASTS OF OCCUPANCY, AVERAGE RATE, AND REVPAR

Average Rate Average Rate Year Occupancy Before Discount Discount After Discount

2020/21 64 % $123.91 2.0 % $121.43 2021/22 68 127.26 1.0 125.99 2022/23 72 131.08 0.0 131.08

November-2018 Projection of Occupancy and Average Rate Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 72

7. Projection of Income and Expense

In this chapter of our report, we have compiled a forecast of income and expense for the proposed subject hotel. This forecast is based on the facilities program set forth previously, as well as the occupancy and average rate forecast discussed previously.

Comparable Operating In order to project future income and expense for the proposed subject hotel, we Statements have included a sample of individual comparable operating statements from our database of hotel statistics. All financial data are presented according to the three most common measures of industry performance: ratio to sales (RTS), amounts per available room (PAR), and amounts per occupied room night (POR). These historical income and expense statements will be used as benchmarks in our forthcoming forecast of income and expense.

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 73

FIGURE 7-1 COMPARABLE OPERATING STATEMENTS: RATIO TO SALES

Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Comp 4 Comp 5 Subject Stabilized $ Year: 2017/18 2017/18 2017 2017 2016/17 2017 Edition: 11 11 11 11 11 11 Number of Rooms: 110 to 140 90 to 120 130 to 170 130 to 170 80 to 110 124 Days Open: 365 365 365 365 365 365 Occupancy: 71% 74% 72% 73% 77% 72% Average Rate: $113 $130 $108 $137 $110 $113 RevPAR: $80 $96 $78 $100 $84 $81 REVENUE Rooms 88.9 % 89.6 % 91.1 % 92.1 % 92.0 % 91.7 % Food & Beverage 9.6 9.7 7.7 6.9 6.7 6.9 Other Operated Departments 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.4 1.2 Mis cellaneous Income 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES* Rooms 23.3 20.4 26.2 22.5 16.9 21.0 Food & Beverage 88.1 98.7 72.4 73.1 88.5 75.0 Other Operated Departments 131.9 51.1 47.4 6.5 51.8 50.0 Total 29.7 28.1 29.9 25.9 22.2 25.0 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 70.3 71.9 70.1 74.1 77.8 75.0 OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 5.0 9.5 11.2 8.3 7.9 8.4 Info. and Telecom. Systems 0.8 2.2 1.2 0.6 2.2 0.9 Marketing 2.6 5.8 7.1 3.3 4.7 3.7 Franchise Fee 8.4 5.9 0.0 5.1 7.7 8.7 Property Operations & Maintenance 3.4 2.0 4.6 3.9 3.3 3.4 Utilities 3.3 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 Total 23.6 27.9 27.2 24.6 29.0 28.2 HOUSE PROFIT 46.7 44.0 42.9 49.5 48.8 46.8 Management Fee 3.6 2.3 6.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 INCOME BEFORE FIXED CHARGES 43.1 41.6 36.8 45.6 45.8 43.8

* Departmental expense ratios are expressed as a percentage of departmental revenues

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 74

FIGURE 7-2 COMPARABLE OPERATING STATEMENTS: AMOUNTS PER AVAILABLE ROOM

Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Comp 4 Comp 5 Subject Stabilized $ Year: 2017/18 2017/18 2017 2017 2016/17 2017 Edition: 11 11 11 11 11 11 Number of Rooms: 110 to 140 90 to 120 130 to 170 130 to 170 80 to 110 124 Days Open: 365 365 365 365 365 365 Occupancy: 71% 74% 72% 73% 77% 72% Average Rate: $113 $130 $108 $137 $110 $113 RevPAR: $80 $96 $78 $100 $84 $81 REVENUE Rooms $29,291 $34,887 $28,416 $36,530 $30,703 $29,639 Food & Beverage 3,174 3,777 2,396 2,744 2,227 2,234 Other Operated Departments 130 238 321 341 456 394 Mis cellaneous Income 337 50 68 45 0 66 Total 32,932 38,952 31,201 39,660 33,386 32,332 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES Rooms 6,816 7,110 7,457 8,232 5,198 6,224 Food & Beverage 2,795 3,729 1,735 2,005 1,971 1,675 Other Operated Departments 172 122 152 22 236 197 Total 9,783 10,961 9,343 10,259 7,405 8,097 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 23,149 27,991 21,858 29,401 25,981 24,236 OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 1,643 3,692 3,505 3,286 2,640 2,700 Info. and Telecom. Systems 277 863 362 240 726 300 Marketing 867 2,260 2,219 1,295 1,564 1,200 Franchise Fee 2,764 2,308 0 2,041 2,577 2,816 Property Operations & Maintenance 1,118 772 1,439 1,549 1,106 1,100 Utilities 1,101 989 976 1,327 1,083 1,000 Total 7,768 10,883 8,502 9,737 9,697 9,116 HOUSE PROFIT 15,381 17,108 13,356 19,664 16,284 15,120 Management Fee 1,172 902 1,872 1,586 1,001 970 INCOME BEFORE FIXED CHARGES 14,209 16,206 11,485 18,077 15,283 14,150

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 75

FIGURE 7-3 COMPARABLE OPERATING STATEMENTS: AMOUNTS PER OCCUPIED ROOM

Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Comp 4 Comp 5 Subject Stabilized $ Year: 2017/18 2017/18 2017 2017 2016/17 2017 Edition: 11 11 11 11 11 11 Number of Rooms: 110 to 140 90 to 120 130 to 170 130 to 170 80 to 110 124 Days Open: 365 365 365 365 365 365 Occupancy: 71% 74% 72% 73% 77% 72% Average Rate: $113 $130 $108 $137 $110 $113 RevPAR: $80 $96 $78 $100 $84 $81 REVENUE Rooms $113.35 $129.52 $108.32 $137.48 $109.85 $112.78 Food & Beverage 12.28 14.02 9.14 10.33 7.97 8.50 Other Operated Departments 0.50 0.88 1.22 1.28 1.63 1.50 Mis cellaneous Income 1.30 0.19 0.26 0.17 0.00 0.25 Total 127.44 144.61 118.94 149.25 119.45 123.03 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES Rooms 26.38 26.40 28.42 30.98 18.60 23.68 Food & Beverage 10.82 13.84 6.61 7.54 7.05 6.38 Other Operated Departments 0.66 0.45 0.58 0.08 0.84 0.75 Total 37.86 40.69 35.62 38.61 26.50 30.81 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 89.58 103.92 83.32 110.65 92.96 92.22 OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 6.36 13.71 13.36 12.37 9.45 10.27 Info. and Telecom. Systems 1.07 3.20 1.38 0.90 2.60 1.14 Marketing 3.35 8.39 8.46 4.87 5.60 4.57 Franchise Fee 10.70 8.57 0.00 7.68 9.22 10.72 Property Operations & Maintenance 4.33 2.87 5.49 5.83 3.96 4.19 Utilities 4.26 3.67 3.72 4.99 3.88 3.81 Total 30.06 40.41 32.41 36.65 34.70 34.69 HOUSE PROFIT 59.52 63.51 50.91 74.00 58.26 57.53 Management Fee 4.53 3.35 7.14 5.97 3.58 3.69 INCOME BEFORE FIXED CHARGES 54.98 60.17 43.78 68.03 54.68 53.84

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 76

The comparable statements’ departmental income ranged from 70.1% to 77.8% of total revenue. The comparable properties achieved a house profit ranging from 42.9% to 49.5% of total revenue.

Inflation Assumption In consideration of the most recent trends, the projections set forth previously, and our assessment of probable property appreciation levels, we have applied underlying inflation rates of 2.5%, 2.5%, and 3.0% thereafter for each respective year following the base year of 2017. This stabilized inflation rate takes into account normal, recurring inflation cycles. Inflation is likely to fluctuate above and below this level during the projection period. Any exceptions to the application of the assumed underlying inflation rate are discussed in our write-up of individual income and expense items.

Forecast of Revenue Based on an analysis that will be detailed throughout this section, we have and Expense formulated a forecast of income and expense. The following table presents a detailed forecast through the fifth projection year, including amounts per available room and per occupied room. The second table illustrates our ten-year forecast of income and expense, presented with a lesser degree of detail. The forecasts pertain to years that begin on June 1, 2020, expressed in inflated dollars for each year.

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 77

FIGURE 7-4 DETAILED FORECAST OF INCOME AND EXPENSE

2020/21 Begins June 2021/22 Stabilized 2023/24 2024/25 Number of Rooms: 124 124 124 124 124 Occupancy: 64% 68% 72% 72% 72% Average Rate: $121.43 $125.99 $131.08 $135.01 $139.06 RevPAR: $77.71 $85.67 $94.38 $97.21 $100.13 Days Open: 365 365 365 365 365 Occupied Rooms: 28,966 %Gross PAR POR 30,777 %Gross PAR POR 32,587 %Gross PAR POR 32,587 %Gross PAR POR 32,587 %Gross PAR POR OPERATING REVENUE Rooms $3,517 91.1 % $28,363 $121.42 $3,878 91.4 % $31,274 $126.00 $4,272 91.7 % $34,452 $131.09 $4,400 91.7 % $35,484 $135.02 $4,532 91.7 % $36,548 $139.07 Food 115 3.0 924 3.95 123 2.9 995 4.01 133 2.8 1,069 4.07 137 2.8 1,101 4.19 141 2.8 1,134 4.32 Beverage 167 4.3 1,350 5.78 178 4.2 1,436 5.79 189 4.1 1,527 5.81 195 4.1 1,573 5.99 201 4.1 1,620 6.17 Other Operated Departments 52 1.3 417 1.79 54 1.3 437 1.76 57 1.2 458 1.74 59 1.2 472 1.80 60 1.2 486 1.85 Miscellaneous Income 9 0.2 70 0.30 9 0.2 73 0.29 9 0.2 76 0.29 10 0.2 79 0.30 10 0.2 81 0.31 Total Operating Revenues 3,859 100.0 31,123 133.23 4,243 100.0 34,216 137.85 4,660 100.0 37,582 143.01 4,800 100.0 38,709 147.29 4,944 100.0 39,870 151.71 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES * Rooms 808 23.0 6,516 27.89 852 22.0 6,867 27.67 897 21.0 7,234 27.53 924 21.0 7,451 28.35 952 21.0 7,675 29.20 Food & Beverage 220 78.2 1,777 7.61 231 76.5 1,860 7.50 241 75.0 1,947 7.41 249 75.0 2,006 7.63 256 75.0 2,066 7.86 Other Operated Departments 27 51.2 214 0.92 27 50.6 221 0.89 28 50.0 229 0.87 29 50.0 236 0.90 30 50.0 243 0.92 Total Expenses 1,055 27.3 8,506 36.41 1,110 26.2 8,949 36.06 1,167 25.0 9,410 35.81 1,202 25.0 9,693 36.88 1,238 25.0 9,983 37.99 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 2,805 72.7 22,617 96.82 3,133 73.8 25,267 101.80 3,493 75.0 28,172 107.20 3,598 75.0 29,016 110.41 3,706 75.0 29,886 113.72 UNDISTRIBUTED OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 356 9.2 2,868 12.28 372 8.8 2,999 12.08 389 8.4 3,138 11.94 401 8.4 3,232 12.30 413 8.4 3,329 12.67 Info & Telecom Systems 40 1.0 319 1.36 41 1.0 333 1.34 43 0.9 349 1.33 45 0.9 359 1.37 46 0.9 370 1.41 Marketing 158 4.1 1,275 5.46 165 3.9 1,333 5.37 173 3.7 1,395 5.31 178 3.7 1,437 5.47 183 3.7 1,480 5.63 Franchise Fee 334 8.7 2,694 11.53 368 8.7 2,971 11.97 406 8.7 3,273 12.45 418 8.7 3,371 12.83 431 8.7 3,472 13.21 Prop. Operations & Maint. 101 2.6 818 3.50 129 3.0 1,039 4.18 159 3.4 1,279 4.87 163 3.4 1,317 5.01 168 3.4 1,356 5.16 Utilities 132 3.4 1,062 4.55 138 3.2 1,111 4.48 144 3.1 1,162 4.42 148 3.1 1,197 4.56 153 3.1 1,233 4.69 Total Expenses 1,121 29.0 9,037 38.68 1,213 28.6 9,786 39.43 1,314 28.2 10,595 40.32 1,353 28.2 10,913 41.53 1,394 28.2 11,240 42.77 GROSS HOUSE PROFIT 1,684 43.7 13,580 58.14 1,920 45.2 15,480 62.37 2,180 46.8 17,577 66.88 2,245 46.8 18,103 68.88 2,312 46.8 18,646 70.95 Management Fee 116 3.0 934 4.00 127 3.0 1,026 4.14 140 3.0 1,127 4.29 144 3.0 1,161 4.42 148 3.0 1,196 4.55 INCOME BEFORE NON-OPR. INC. & EXP. 1,568 40.7 12,647 54.14 1,792 42.2 14,454 58.24 2,040 43.8 16,449 62.59 2,101 43.8 16,942 64.47 2,164 43.8 17,450 66.40 NON-OPERATING INCOME & EXPENSE Property Taxes 267 6.9 2,156 9.23 274 6.5 2,210 8.90 282 6.1 2,277 8.66 291 6.1 2,345 8.92 299 6.1 2,415 9.19 Insurance 54 1.4 438 1.88 56 1.3 451 1.82 58 1.2 465 1.77 59 1.2 479 1.82 61 1.2 493 1.88 Reserve for Replacement 77 2.0 622 2.66 127 3.0 1,026 4.14 186 4.0 1,503 5.72 192 4.0 1,548 5.89 198 4.0 1,595 6.07 Total Expenses 399 10.3 3,217 13.77 457 10.8 3,688 14.86 526 11.3 4,245 16.15 542 11.3 4,372 16.64 558 11.3 4,503 17.14 EBITDA LESS RESERVE $1,169 30.4 % $9,430 $40.37 $1,335 31.4 % $10,766 $43.38 $1,513 32.5 % $12,204 $46.44 $1,559 32.5 % $12,570 $47.83 $1,605 32.5 % $12,947 $49.26 *Departmental expenses are expressed as a percentage of departmental revenues.

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 78

FIGURE 7-5 TEN-YEAR FORECAST OF INCOME AND EXPENSE

2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30

Number of Rooms: 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 Occupied Rooms: 28,966 30,777 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 32,587 Occupancy: 64% 68% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% Average Rate: $121.43 % of $125.99 % of $131.08 % of $135.01 % of $139.06 % of $143.24 % of $147.53 % of $151.96 % of $156.52 % of $161.21 % of RevPAR: $77.71 Gross $85.67 Gross $94.38 Gross $97.21 Gross $100.13 Gross $103.13 Gross $106.22 Gross $109.41 Gross $112.69 Gross $116.07 Gross OPERATING REVENUE Rooms $3,517 91.1 % $3,878 91.4 % $4,272 91.7 % $4,400 91.7 % $4,532 91.7 % $4,668 91.7 % $4,808 91.7 % $4,952 91.7 % $5,100 91.7 % $5,253 91.7 % Food 115 3.0 123 2.9 133 2.8 137 2.8 141 2.8 145 2.8 149 2.8 154 2.8 158 2.8 163 2.8 Beverage 167 4.3 178 4.2 189 4.1 195 4.1 201 4.1 207 4.1 213 4.1 220 4.1 226 4.1 233 4.1 Other Operated Departments 52 1.3 54 1.3 57 1.2 59 1.2 60 1.2 62 1.2 64 1.2 66 1.2 68 1.2 70 1.2 Miscellaneous Income 9 0.2 9 0.2 9 0.2 10 0.2 10 0.2 10 0.2 11 0.2 11 0.2 11 0.2 12 0.2 Total Operating Revenues 3,859 100.0 4,243 100.0 4,660 100.0 4,800 100.0 4,944 100.0 5,092 100.0 5,245 100.0 5,402 100.0 5,564 100.0 5,730 100.0 DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES * Rooms 808 23.0 852 22.0 897 21.0 924 21.0 952 21.0 980 21.0 1,010 21.0 1,040 21.0 1,071 21.0 1,103 21.0 Food & Beverage 220 78.2 231 76.5 241 75.0 249 75.0 256 75.0 264 75.0 272 75.0 280 75.0 288 75.0 297 75.0 Other Operated Departments 27 51.2 27 50.6 28 50.0 29 50.0 30 50.0 31 50.0 32 50.0 33 50.0 34 50.0 35 50.0 Total Expenses 1,055 27.3 1,110 26.2 1,167 25.0 1,202 25.0 1,238 25.0 1,275 25.0 1,313 25.0 1,353 25.0 1,393 25.0 1,435 25.0 DEPARTMENTAL INCOME 2,805 72.7 3,133 73.8 3,493 75.0 3,598 75.0 3,706 75.0 3,817 75.0 3,932 75.0 4,049 75.0 4,170 75.0 4,295 75.0 UNDISTRIBUTED OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative & General 356 9.2 372 8.8 389 8.4 401 8.4 413 8.4 425 8.4 438 8.4 451 8.4 465 8.4 479 8.4 Info & Telecom Systems 40 1.0 41 1.0 43 0.9 45 0.9 46 0.9 47 0.9 49 0.9 50 0.9 52 0.9 53 0.9 Marketing 158 4.1 165 3.9 173 3.7 178 3.7 183 3.7 189 3.7 195 3.7 200 3.7 207 3.7 213 3.7 Franchise Fee 334 8.7 368 8.7 406 8.7 418 8.7 431 8.7 443 8.7 457 8.7 470 8.7 485 8.7 499 8.7 Prop. Operations & Maint. 101 2.6 129 3.0 159 3.4 163 3.4 168 3.4 173 3.4 178 3.4 184 3.4 189 3.4 195 3.4 Utilities 132 3.4 138 3.2 144 3.1 148 3.1 153 3.1 157 3.1 162 3.1 167 3.1 172 3.1 177 3.1 Total Expenses 1,121 29.0 1,213 28.6 1,314 28.2 1,353 28.2 1,394 28.2 1,436 28.2 1,479 28.2 1,523 28.2 1,569 28.2 1,616 28.2 GROSS HOUSE PROFIT 1,684 43.7 1,920 45.2 2,180 46.8 2,245 46.8 2,312 46.8 2,381 46.8 2,453 46.8 2,526 46.8 2,602 46.8 2,680 46.8 Management Fee 116 3.0 127 3.0 140 3.0 144 3.0 148 3.0 153 3.0 157 3.0 162 3.0 167 3.0 172 3.0 INCOME BEFORE NON-OPR. INC. & EXP. 1,568 40.7 1,792 42.2 2,040 43.8 2,101 43.8 2,164 43.8 2,229 43.8 2,296 43.8 2,364 43.8 2,435 43.8 2,508 43.8 NON-OPERATING INCOME & EXPENSE Property Taxes 267 6.9 274 6.5 282 6.1 291 6.1 299 6.1 308 6.1 318 6.1 327 6.1 337 6.1 347 6.1 Insurance 54 1.4 56 1.3 58 1.2 59 1.2 61 1.2 63 1.2 65 1.2 67 1.2 69 1.2 71 1.2 Reserve for Replacement 77 2.0 127 3.0 186 4.0 192 4.0 198 4.0 204 4.0 210 4.0 216 4.0 223 4.0 229 4.0 Total Expenses 399 10.3 457 10.8 526 11.3 542 11.3 558 11.3 575 11.3 592 11.3 610 11.3 628 11.3 647 11.3 EBITDA LESS RESERVE $1,169 30.4 % $1,335 31.4 % $1,513 32.5 % $1,559 32.5 % $1,605 32.5 % $1,654 32.5 % $1,703 32.5 % $1,754 32.5 % $1,806 32.5 % $1,860 32.5 % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 79

We anticipate that it will take three years for the proposed subject hotel to reach a stabilized level of operation. Each revenue and expense item has been forecast based upon our review of the proposed subject hotel's operating budget and comparable income and expense statements. The forecast is based upon fiscal years beginning June 1, 2020, expressed in inflated dollars for each year.

Revenues associated with the proposed subject hotel's food and beverage operation, other operated departments, and miscellaneous income category have been forecast to reflect the hotel's planned facilities and amenities. Expense levels fall within a range of reasonableness given the provided comparable operating statements; furthermore, franchise and management fees are set forth in accordance with our assumptions provided in the Nature of the Assignment chapter.

Property Taxes Property (or ad valorem) tax is one of the primary revenue sources of municipalities. Based on the concept that the tax burden should be distributed in proportion to the value of all properties within a taxing jurisdiction, a system of assessments is established. Theoretically, the assessed value placed on each parcel bears a definite relationship to market value, so properties with equal market values will have similar assessments and properties with higher and lower values will have proportionately larger and smaller assessments.

Depending on the taxing policy of the municipality, property taxes can be based on the value of the real property or the value of the personal property and the real property. We have based our estimate of the proposed subject property's market value (for tax purposes) on an analysis of assessments of comparable hotel properties in the local municipality.

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 80

FIGURE 7-6 COUNTY-ASSESSED VALUE OF COMPARABLE HOTELS

Year Hotel Open Land Improvements Total

Hilton Garden Inn Dallas Arlington South 2017 $430,472 $8,549,845 $8,980,317 Courtyard by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 2010 1,085,770 7,794,230 8,880,000 Hampton Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 2007 821,279 5,778,721 6,600,000 Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall 1995 601,153 5,398,847 6,000,000 La Quinta Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 1997 845,832 5,734,168 6,580,000 Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Arlington South 2016 1,002,348 6,097,652 7,100,000 Residence Inn by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 2009 1,102,270 8,282,730 9,385,000

Assessments per Room # of Rms Hilton Garden Inn Dallas Arlington South 132 $3,261 $64,772 $68,033 Courtyard by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 103 10,541 75,672 86,214 Hampton Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 98 8,380 58,967 67,347 Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Arlington I 20 Parks Mall 101 5,952 53,454 59,406 La Quinta Inn & Suites Dallas Arlington South 128 6,608 44,798 51,406 Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Arlington South 101 9,924 60,373 70,297 Residence Inn by Marriott Dallas Arlington South 96 11,482 86,278 97,760

Positioned Subject - Per Room 124 $9,000 $70,000 $79,000 Positioned Subject - Total $1,116,000 $8,680,000 $9,796,000

Source: Tarrant Appraisal District

We have positioned the future assessment levels of the subject site and proposed improvements based upon the illustrated comparable data. We have positioned these assessments closest to the Hilton Garden Inn and Courtyard by Marriott because of the similarities, including product type; overall, the positioned assessments are well supported by the market data.

Tax rates are based on the city and county budgets, which change annually. The most recent tax rate in this jurisdiction was reported at 2.59797%. The following table shows changes in the tax rate during the last several years.

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 81

FIGURE 7-7 COUNTY TAX RATES

Real Property Year Tax Rate

2015 2.70235 2016 2.66151 2017 2.61696 2018 2.59797

Source: Tarrant Appraisal District

Based on comparable assessments and the tax rate information, the proposed subject property's projected property tax expense levels are calculated as follows.

FIGURE 7-8 PROJECTED PROPERTY TAX BURDEN (BASE YEAR)

Real Property Land Real Property Total Positioned (Assessed Value) $1,116,000 $8,680,000 $9,796,000 Tax Rate 2.59797 Tax Burden as of Base Year $254,497

FIGURE 7-9 PROJECTED PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE

Real Property Total Tax Burden Base Rate of Tax % Positioned Taxes Year (Positioned Prior to Increase) Burden Increase Tax Burden Payable

Positioned $254,497 — $254,497 2020/21 $254,497 5.1 % 100 % $267,381 2021/22 267,381 2.5 100 274,065 2022/23 274,065 3.0 100 282,287 2023/24 282,287 3.0 100 290,756

Conclusion In conclusion, our analysis reflects a profitable operation, with net income expected to total 32.5% of total revenue by the stabilized year. The stabilized total revenue comprises primarily rooms and food and beverage revenue, with a secondary portion derived from other income sources. On the cost side, departmental expenses total 25.0% of revenue by the stabilized year, while undistributed operating expenses total 28.2% of total revenues; this assumes that the property will be operated competently by a well-known hotel operator. After a 3.0% of total

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 82

revenues management fee, and 11.3% of total revenues in fixed expenses, a net income ratio of 32.5% is forecast by the stabilized year.

November-2018 Projection of Income and Expense Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 83

8. Feasibility Analysis

Return on investment can be defined as the future benefits of an income-producing property relative to its acquisition or construction cost. The first step in performing a return on investment analysis is to determine the amount to be initially invested. For a proposed property, this amount is most likely to be the development cost of the hotel. Based on the total development cost, the individual investor will utilize a return on investment analysis to determine if the future cash flow from a current cash outlay meets his or her own investment criteria and at what level above or below this amount such an outlay exceeds or fails to meet these criteria.

As an individual or company considering investment in hotel real estate, the decision to use one’s own cash, an equity partner's capital, or lender financing will be an internal one. Because hotels typically require a substantial investment, only the largest investors and hotel companies generally have the means to purchase properties with all cash. We would anticipate the involvement of some financing by a third party for the typical investor or for those who may be entering the market for hotel acquisitions at this time. In leveraged acquisitions and developments where investors typically purchase or build upon real estate with a small amount of equity cash (20% to 50%) and a large amount of mortgage financing (50% to 80%), it is important for the equity investor to acknowledge the return requirements of the debt participant (mortgagee), as well as his or her own return requirements. Therefore, we will begin our rate of return analysis by reviewing the debt requirements of typical hotel mortgagees.

Construction Cost Because the subject property is a proposed hotel, we have relied upon the actual Estimate development budget for the proposed subject hotel in performing a cost analysis. As this budget takes into consideration all of the physical, structural, and design elements specific to the property, it is believed to be the most accurate assessment of the actual cost of developing a hotel facility of this type. The details of this budget, prepared by the developers of the Proposed Aloft South Arlington, are presented in the following table.

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 84

FIGURE 8-1 SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSTRUCTION BUDGET

Component Cost Cost per Room Hard Costs & Site Improvements Trade Costs $6,400,000 $51,613 General Conditions 1,000,000 8,065 Contingency 725,000 5,847 Interior Signage 50,000 403 Exterior Signage 100,000 806 Subtotal Hard Cost & Site Improvements $8,275,000 $66,734 FF&E and OS&E Guestrooms FF&E $1,500,000 $12,097 Guestroom Corridors FF&E $125,000 1,008 Public Space FF&E 200,000 1,613 Guestrooms OS&E 300,000 2,419 Public Space OS&E 100,000 806 Heart of House OS&E 100,000 806 Food and Beverage OS&E 100,000 806 Information Technology 250,000 2,016 Laundry Equipment 75,000 605 Kitchen Equipment 125,000 1,008 Subtotal FFE & OS&E 2,875,000 $23,185 Pre-Opening Costs and Working Capital Building Permits $100,000 $806 Municipal & Utility Fees 50,000 403 General Liability Insurance 40,000 323 Builder's Risk Insurance 60,000 484 Working Capital 500,000 4,032 Interest Reserve 500,000 4,032 Project Management 200,000 1,613 Development Fees 600,000 4,839 Subtotal Pre-Opening and Working Capital $2,050,000 $16,532 Soft Costs Architect/ID/Structural, Civil & MEP Engineers $250,000 $2,016 Testing/Inspections 100,000 806 Legal & Accounting 250,000 2,016 Subtotal Soft Costs $600,000 $4,839 Subtotal (without Land and Developer's Fee) $13,800,000 $111,290

Site Cost $1,200,000 $9,677

Total (without Developer's Fee) $15,000,000 $120,968

Mortgage Component Based on our analysis of the current lodging industry mortgage market and adjustments for specific factors, such as the property’s site, proposed facility, and conditions in the Arlington hotel market, it is our opinion that a 5.00% interest, 25-

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 85

year amortization mortgage with a 0.070151 constant is appropriate for the proposed subject hotel. In the mortgage-equity analysis, we have applied a loan-to- cost ratio of 65%, which is reasonable to expect based on this interest rate and current parameters.

Equity Component The remaining capital required for a hotel investment generally comes from the equity investor. The following table summarizes the range of equity yields indicated by hotel sales and investor interviews. We note that there tends to be lag between the sales data and current market conditions, and thus, the full effect of the change in the economy and capital markets may not yet be reflected.

FIGURE 8-2 SUMMARY OF EQUITY YIELD OR INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN REQUIREMENTS

Source Data Point Range Average

HVS Hotel Sales - Full-Service & Luxury 12.7% - 22.9% 17.2% HVS Hotel Sales - Select-Service & Extended-Stay 12.7% - 26.1% 19.1% HVS Hotel Sales - Limited-Service 16% - 26.1% 20.1%

HVS Investor Interviews 13% - 25%

Based on the assumed 65% loan-to-cost ratio, the risk inherent in achieving the projected income stream, and the anticipated market position of the subject property, it is our opinion that an equity investor could expect to receive a 19.0% internal rate of return over a 10-year holding period, assuming that the investor obtains financing at the time of the project’s completion at the loan-to-cost ratio and interest rate set forth.

Terminal Capitalization We have reviewed several recent investor surveys, and the following table Rate summarizes the data.

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 86

FIGURE 8-3 TERMINAL CAPITALIZATION RATES DERIVED FROM INVESTOR SURVEYS

Source Data Point Range Average

HVS Brokers Survey - Fall 2018 Limited-Service & Economy Hotels 5.0% - 11.0% 8.8% Select-Service Hotels 4.5% - 10.0% 8.3% Full-Service Hotels 4.5% - 10.0% 7.7% Luxury & Upper Upscale Hotels 5.0% - 10.0% 7.0%

PWC Real Estate Investor Survey - 3rd Quarter 2018 Limited-Service Hotels 7.75% - 11.0% 9.4% Select-Service Hotels 7.0% - 10.0% 8.8% Full-Service Hotels 7.0% - 10.0% 8.4% Luxury Hotels 5.5% - 9.5% 7.3%

USRC Hotel Investment Survey - Mid-Year 2018 Full-Service Hotels 7.5% - 9.5% 8.3% Limited-Service Hotels 8.0% - 9.5% 9.0%

Situs RERC Real Estate Report - 2nd Quarter 2018 First Tier Hotels 7.0% - 11.3% 8.4% Second Tier Hotels 7.5% - 12.0% 9.4% Third Tier Hotels 7.3% - 13.0% 10.0%

For purposes of this analysis, we have applied a terminal capitalization rate of 9.50%. Our final position for the terminal capitalization rate reflects the current market for hotel investments and also considers the subject property's attributes. Terminal capitalization rates, in general, have remained stable over the past few years. Terminal cap rates are at the low end of the range for quality hotel assets in markets with high barriers to entry and at the high end of the range for older assets or for those suffering from functional obsolescence and/or weak market conditions, reflecting the market's recognition that certain assets have less opportunity for significant appreciation.

Mortgage-Equity As the two participants in a real estate investment, investors and lenders must Method evaluate their equity and debt contributions based on their particular return requirements. After carefully weighing the risk associated with the projected economic benefits of a lodging investment, the participants will typically make their decision whether or not to invest in a hotel or resort by determining if their investment will provide an adequate yield over an established period. For the lender, this yield will typically reflect the interest rate required for a hotel mortgage over a period of what can range from seven to ten years. The yield to the equity

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 87

participant may consider not only the requirements of a particular investor, but also the potential payments to cooperative or ancillary entities such as limited partner payouts, stockholder dividends, and management company incentive fees.

The return on investment analysis in a hotel acquisition would not be complete without recognizing and reflecting the yield requirements of both the equity and debt participants. The analysis will now calculate the yields to the mortgage and equity participants during a ten-year projection period.

The annual debt service is calculated by multiplying the mortgage component by the mortgage constant.

Mortgage Component $9,742,000 Mortgage Constant 0.070151 Annual Debt Service $683,000

The yield to the lender based on a 65% debt contribution equates to an interest rate of 5.00%, which is calculated as follows.

FIGURE 8-4 RETURN TO THE LENDER

Total Annual Present Worth of $1 Discounted Year Debt Service Factor at 4.9% Cash Flow

2020/21 $683,000 x 0.953009 = $651,000 2021/22 683,000 x 0.908225 = 620,000 2022/23 683,000 x 0.865546 = 591,000 2023/24 683,000 x 0.824873 = 563,000 2024/25 683,000 x 0.786111 = 537,000 2025/26 683,000 x 0.749170 = 512,000 2026/27 683,000 x 0.713966 = 488,000 2027/28 683,000 x 0.680416 = 465,000 2028/29 683,000 x 0.648442 = 443,000 2029/30 7,885,000 * x 0.617971 = 4,873,000

Value of Mortgage Component $9,743,000 *10th year debt service of $683,000 plus outstanding mortgage balance of $7,202,000

The following table illustrates the cash flow available to the equity position, after deducting the debt service from the projected net income.

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 88

FIGURE 8-5 NET INCOME TO EQUITY

Net Income Available for Total Annual Net Income Year Debt Service Debt Service to Equity

2020/21 $1,169,000 - $683,000 = $486,000 2021/22 $1,335,000 - 683,000 = $652,000 2022/23 $1,513,000 - 683,000 = $830,000 2023/24 $1,559,000 - 683,000 = $876,000 2024/25 $1,605,000 - 683,000 = $922,000 2025/26 $1,654,000 - 683,000 = $971,000 2026/27 $1,703,000 - 683,000 = $1,020,000 2027/28 $1,754,000 - 683,000 = $1,071,000 2028/29 $1,806,000 - 683,000 = $1,123,000 2029/30 $1,860,000 - 683,000 = $1,177,000

In order for the present value of the equity investment to equate to the $5,245,000 capital outlay, the investor must accept a 20.5% return, as shown in the following table.

FIGURE 8-6 EQUITY COMPONENT YIELD

Net Income Present Worth of $1 Discounted Year to Equity Factor at 20.5% Cash Flow

2020/21 $486,000 x 0.829833 = $403,000 2021/22 $652,000 x 0.688623 = 449,000 2022/23 $830,000 x 0.571442 = 474,000 2023/24 $876,000 x 0.474202 = 415,000 2024/25 $922,000 x 0.393509 = 363,000 2025/26 $971,000 x 0.326546 = 317,000 2026/27 $1,020,000 x 0.270979 = 276,000 2027/28 $1,071,000 x 0.224867 = 241,000 2028/29 $1,123,000 x 0.186603 = 210,000 2029/30 $13,541,000 * x 0.154849 = 2,097,000

Value of Equity Component $5,245,000 *10th year net income to equity of $1,177,428 plus sales proceeds of $12,364,000

Conclusion In determining the potential feasibility of the proposed Proposed Aloft South Arlington, we analyzed the lodging market, researched the area’s economics, reviewed the estimated development cost, and prepared a ten-year forecast of

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 89

income and expense, which was based on our review of the current and historical market conditions, as well as comparable income and expense statements.

The conclusion of this analysis indicates that an equity investor contributing $5,245,000 (roughly 35% of the $15,000,000 development cost) could expect to receive a 20.5% internal rate of return over a ten-year holding period, assuming that the investor obtains financing at the time of the project’s completion at the loan-to- value ratio and interest rate set forth. The proposed subject hotel has an opportunity to provide an elevated guestroom product within the South Arlington market. Based on our market analysis, there is sufficient market support for the proposed Aloft hotel. Our review of investor surveys indicates equity returns ranging from 12.7% to 26.1%, with an average of 19.1%. Based on these parameters, the calculated return to the equity investor, 20.5%, is above the average and within the range of market-level returns given the developer's anticipated cost of $15,000,000 (does not include entrepreneurial incentive).

The analysis is based on the extraordinary assumption that the described improvements have been completed as of the stated date of opening. The reader should understand that the completed subject property does not yet exist as of the date of this report. Our feasibility study does not address unforeseeable events that could alter the proposed project, and/or the market conditions reflected in the analyses; we assume that no significant changes, other than those anticipated and explained in this report, shall take place between the date of inspection and stated date of opening. The use of this extraordinary assumption may have affected the assignment results. We have made no other extraordinary assumptions specific to this feasibility study. However, several important general assumptions have been made that apply to this feasibility study and our studies of proposed hotels in general. These aspects are set forth in the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions chapter of this report.

November-2018 Feasibility Analysis Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 90

9. Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions

1. This report is set forth as a feasibility study of the proposed subject hotel; this is not an appraisal report. 2. This report is to be used in whole and not in part. 3. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature, nor do we render any opinion as to title, which is assumed marketable and free of any deed restrictions and easements. The property is evaluated as though free and clear unless otherwise stated. 4. We assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the sub- soil or structures, such as underground storage tanks, that would affect the property’s development potential. No responsibility is assumed for these conditions or for any engineering that may be required to discover them. 5. We have not considered the presence of potentially hazardous materials or any form of toxic waste on the project site. We are not qualified to detect hazardous substances and urge the client to retain an expert in this field if desired. 6. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. We have assumed the proposed hotel would be designed and constructed to be in full compliance with the ADA. 7. We have made no survey of the site, and we assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. Sketches, photographs, maps, and other exhibits are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. It is assumed that the use of the described real estate will be within the boundaries of the property described, and that no encroachment will exist. 8. All information, financial operating statements, estimates, and opinions obtained from parties not employed by TS Worldwide, LLC are assumed true and correct. We can assume no liability resulting from misinformation. 9. Unless noted, we assume that there are no encroachments, zoning violations, or building violations encumbering the subject property. 10. The property is assumed to be in full compliance with all applicable federal, state, local, and private codes, laws, consents, licenses, and regulations (including the appropriate liquor license if applicable), and that all licenses, permits, certificates, franchises, and so forth can be freely renewed or transferred to a purchaser.

November-2018 Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 91

11. All mortgages, liens, encumbrances, leases, and servitudes have been disregarded unless specified otherwise. 12. None of this material may be reproduced in any form without our written permission, and the report cannot be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media. 13. We are not required to give testimony or attendance in court because of this analysis without previous arrangements and shall do so only when our standard per-diem fees and travel costs have been paid prior to the appearance. 14. If the reader is making a fiduciary or individual investment decision and has any questions concerning the material presented in this report, it is recommended that the reader contact us. 15. We take no responsibility for any events or circumstances that take place subsequent to the date of our field inspection. 16. The quality of a lodging facility's onsite management has a direct effect on a property's economic viability. The financial forecasts presented in this analysis assume responsible ownership and competent management. Any departure from this assumption may have a significant impact on the projected operating results. 17. The financial analysis presented in this report is based upon assumptions, estimates, and evaluations of the market conditions in the local and national economy, which may be subject to sharp rises and declines. Over the projection period considered in our analysis, wages and other operating expenses may increase or decrease because of market volatility and economic forces outside the control of the hotel’s management. We assume that the price of hotel rooms, food, beverages, and other sources of revenue to the hotel will be adjusted to offset any increases or decreases in related costs. We do not warrant that our estimates will be attained, but they have been developed based upon information obtained during the course of our market research and are intended to reflect the expectations of a typical hotel investor as of the stated date of the report. 18. This analysis assumes continuation of all Internal Revenue Service tax code provisions as stated or interpreted on either the date of value or the date of our field inspection, whichever occurs first. 19. Many of the figures presented in this report were generated using sophisticated computer models that make calculations based on numbers carried out to three or more decimal places. In the interest of simplicity, most numbers have been rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent. Thus, these figures may be subject to small rounding errors.

November-2018 Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 92

20. It is agreed that our liability to the client is limited to the amount of the fee paid as liquidated damages. Our responsibility is limited to the client; the use of this report by third parties shall be solely at the risk of the client and/or third parties. The use of this report is also subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our engagement letter with the client. 21. Evaluating and comprising financial forecasts for hotels is both a science and an art. Although this analysis employs various mathematical calculations to provide value indications, the final forecasts are subjective and may be influenced by our experience and other factors not specifically set forth in this report. 22. This study was prepared by TS Worldwide, LLC. All opinions, recommendations, and conclusions expressed during the course of this assignment are rendered by the staff of TS Worldwide, LLC as employees, rather than as individuals.

November-2018 Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 93

10. Certification

The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

1. the statements of fact presented in this report are true and correct; 2. the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions; 3. we have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved; 4. we have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment; 5. our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results; 6. our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined result or direction in performance that favors the cause of the client, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this study; 7. our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice; 8. Kathleen D. Donahue personally inspected the property described in this report; 9. no one other than those listed above and the undersigned prepared the analyses, conclusions, and opinions concerning the real estate that are set forth in this report; Kathleen D. Donahue has not performed services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, on the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment; 10. the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute;

November-2018 Certification Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 94

11. the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.

Kathleen D. Donahue Senior Vice President, Partner TS Worldwide, LLC State Appraiser License TX 1337633 G

November-2018 Certification Proposed Aloft South Arlington – Arlington, Texas 95

Kathleen Donahue

EMPLOYMENT

2003 to present HVS CONSULTING AND VALUATION SERVICES Dallas, Texas

1999 – 2003 RADISSON HOTEL AND SUITES Austin, Texas

1997 – 1999 RADISSON SUITES HOTEL Arlington, Texas

EDUCATION AND OTHER BA – University of Texas at Austin

TRAINING Other Specialized Training Classes Completed: Real Estate Appraisal – 60 hours Uniform Residential Appraisal Report – 15 hours Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice – 15 hours Income Property Analysis – 15 hours Basic Appraisal Procedures – 30 hours

Appraisal Institute Classes Completed for the MAI Designation: Advanced Income Capitalization – 40 hours Advanced HBU and Market Analysis – 30 hours Business Practices and Ethics – 8 hours Report Writing and Valuation Analysis – 40 hours Advanced Sales & Cost – 40 hours Marshall & Swift Commercial Cost Training – 7 hours Small Hotel/Motel Valuation – 7 hours Cool Tools: New Technology for Real Estate Appraisals – 7 hours Fundamentals of Separating Real, Personal Property, and Intangible Business Assets – 7 hours Advanced Concepts & Case Studies – 40 hours Introduction to Green Buildings: Principles & Concepts – 8 hours General Demonstration Report Writing – 7 hours General Demonstration Report – Capstone Application & Interpretation of Simple Linear Regression – 15 hours

HVS, Dallas, Texas Qualifications of Kathleen Donahue 1

EDUCATION (CON’T) TX Supervisor/Trainee – 4 hours Advanced Hotel Appraisals – 7 hours The Sales Comparison Approach – 7 hours Appraisal of Land Subject to Ground Lease – 7 hours Capstone - Demo Report Annual USPAP Updates

STATE CERTIFICATIONS Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas

PUBLISHED ARTICLES

HVS Journal “HVS Takeaways: The 2016 Dallas Hotel Conference,” co-authored with Hunter Dietz, October 2016

HVS Journal “Four Key Takeaways: Trigild Lender Conference Spring 2015,” June 2015

HVS Journal “Three Key Takeaways: Crittenden National Real Estate Conference,” May 2015

HVS Journal “Fort Worth Market Intelligence Report 2013,” August 2013

HVS Journal “Dallas Market Intelligence Report 2013,” August 2013

HVS Journal “Volatile Trends and Hotel Performance,” co-authored with Jane Rogers, December 2010

PROFESSIONAL American Hotel & Lodging Association AFFILIATIONS Flower Mound Chamber of Commerce

HVS, Dallas, Texas Qualifications of Kathleen Donahue 2

EXAMPLES OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED Pueblo Depot, (U.S. Army Lodging OR EVALUATED Assessment), Pueblo INDIANA

ALASKA CONNECTICUT Days Inn, Indianapolis

Hampton Inn, Anchorage Heritage Inn, Southbury KANSAS Hilton Garden Inn, Anchorage Homewood Suites by Hilton, DELAWARE Capitol Plaza, Topeka Anchorage Comfort Suites (Four Points LOUISIANA ARIZONA Conversion), Newark Motel 6 Baton Rouge Southeast, Baton , Bullhead City DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Rouge MainStay Suites, Tempe Motel 6 Shreveport Bossier City, Proposed Convention Hotel, Bossier City ARKANSAS Washington Courtyard by Marriott, Houma Holiday Inn Select, New Orleans Hampton Inn, Conway FLORIDA Hotel Maison de Ville, New Orleans Hilton Garden Inn, Conway Motel 6 Bullard Avenue, New Orleans Motel 6 Fort Smith East, Fort Smith Key Largo Grande (former Sheraton), Proposed Virgin Hotel, New Orleans Motel 6, Jonesboro Key Largo Warehouse District, New Orleans , Little Rock Hilton Orlando Walt Disney World, Studio 6, New Orleans Proposed Hilton Garden Inn, Little Lake Buena Vista Motel 6 Baton Rouge Port Allen, Port Rock Proposed Value Place, Orange Park Allen Residence Inn by Marriott, Little Rock Proposed Pearl, Rosemary Beach Motel 6, Slidell Hilton Garden Inn, Tampa CALIFORNIA Hyatt Regency, Tampa MARYLAND

Travelodge, Anaheim GEORGIA Comfort Inn, Frederick Fort Irwin, (U.S. Army Lodging Fort Detrick, (U.S. Army Lodging Assessment), Barstow Clubhouse Inn, Atlanta Assessment), Frederick Beverly Wilshire, Beverly Hills Hampton Inn, Austell Holiday Inn, Ocean City Homewood Suites by Hilton, Brisbane Cambria Suites, Savannah Woodfin Suites, Rockville Byron Hot Springs Resort, Byron Sierra Army Depot, (U.S. Army Lodging HAWAII MICHIGAN Assessment), Herlong Holiday Inn, La Mirada Park Shore Hotel, Waikiki Residence Inn by Marriott, Ann Arbor Proposed Courtyard and Residence Holiday Inn, Bay City Inn, Marina Del Rey IDAHO Courtyard by Marriott, Flint Proposed Boutique Hotel, Ontario DoubleTree by Hilton, Sacramento Courtyard by Marriott Boise West, MISSISSIPPI Hilton Garden Inn, South San Boise Francisco Proposed Holiday Inn Resort, Gulfport ILLINOIS Best Western Goodman, Horn Lake COLORADO Holiday Inn Southaven Central Rock Island Arsenal, (U.S. Army Memphis, Southaven Lodging Assessment), Chicago

HVS, Dallas, Texas Qualifications of Kathleen Donahue 3

NEVADA Residence Inn South, Austin SOUTH CAROLINA Hampton Inn, Beaumont Proposed Holiday Inn, Las Vegas Proposed Cedar Hill Hotel at Hillside Proposed Hyatt Place, Columbia Village, Cedar Hill NEW JERSEY Fairfield Inn, Orangeburg Proposed Convention Hotel, Cedar Hill Proposed Select-Service Hotel at Hamilton Park, Florham Park TENNESSEE Cleburne Conference Center, Cleburne NEW YORK Clubhouse Inn, Knoxville Fairfield Inn by Marriott, The Colony Proposed Hotel, The Colony Park Plaza, Cheektowaga TEXAS Proposed La Quinta Inn & Suites, The USMA West Point, (U.S. Army Lodging Colony Assessment), West Point Courtyard by Marriott Quorum, Residence Inn by Marriott, The Colony Addison Courtyard by Marriott, Corpus Christi OHIO Crowne Plaza Dallas Galleria, Addison Aloft Dallas Love Field, Dallas Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Bradford Suites, Dallas Columbus DLA, (U.S. Army Lodging Addison, Addison Courtyard by Marriott Market Center, Assessment), Columbus InterContinental Dallas, Addison Dallas Holiday Inn Express, Allen DoubleTree by Hilton Campbell OKLAHOMA Proposed Full-Service Hotel, Allen Center, Dallas Proposed Hotel, Allen DoubleTree by Hilton Dallas Near the Proposed Hilton Garden Inn, Lawton Baymont Inn & Suites, Amarillo Galleria, Dallas Sixpence Inn Oklahoma City East, Comfort Suites, Arlington Embassy Suites, Dallas Midwest City Courtyard by Marriott South, Arlington Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott Crowne Plaza (Conversion to Courtyard Dallas Arlington Market Center, Dallas DoubleTree), Oklahoma City Entertainment District, Arlington Fairmont Hotel, Dallas Hyatt Place Oklahoma City Airport, Hilton, Arlington Grand Hyatt DFW Airport, Dallas Oklahoma City Holiday Inn Arlington Northeast Hilton Anatole, Dallas Motel 6 Oklahoma City Airport, Rangers Ballpark, Arlington Hilton Dallas Park Cities, Dallas Oklahoma City Holiday Inn Express, Arlington Hilton Garden Inn Market Center, Sheraton, Oklahoma City Hyatt Place, Arlington Dallas SpringHill Suites by Marriott, Proposed Aloft, Arlington Hilton Lincoln Centre, Dallas Oklahoma City Proposed Element, Arlington Holiday Inn Market Center, Dallas Wyndham Airport, Oklahoma City Proposed Embassy Suites, Arlington Holiday Inn Select, Dallas Adam’s Mark, Tulsa Proposed Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites, Homewood Suites Dallas Market Ambassador Hotel, Tulsa Arlington Center, Dallas Proposed Aloft, Tulsa Proposed Homewood Suites by Hilton, Hotel Magnolia, Dallas Proposed Best Western Plus, Tulsa Arlington Hyatt House, Dallas Proposed Hotel, Arlington Hyatt Regency DFW Airport, Dallas PENNSYLVANIA Proposed Westin, Arlington InTown Suites Dallas Forest Lane, Residence Inn South Arlington, Dallas Hilton Garden Inn, Gettysburg Arlington , Dallas Proposed Even Hotel at Macy’s Sheraton, Arlington Le Meridien, Dallas Building, Pittsburgh Wyndham, Arlington Park Inn Dallas Love Field, Dallas Tobyhanna Army Depot, (U.S. Army Fairfield Inn & Suites, Austin Proposed Boutique Hotel at Lodging Assessment), Tobyhanna Proposed Boutique Hotel at 12th/Red Petroleum, Dallas Super 8, York River, Austin

HVS, Dallas, Texas Qualifications of Kathleen Donahue 4

Proposed Element at Trinity Groves, Proposed Extended-Stay Hotel - Fort Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Dallas Worth, Fort Worth Houston East, Houston Proposed Hotel at Baylor, Dallas Proposed Home2 Suites by Hilton Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston Proposed Hotel at Southwest Center Baylor Scott & White All Saints Clear Lake, Houston Mall Site, Dallas Medical Center Fort Worth, Fort Proposed Full-Service Hotel, Houston Proposed Boutique Hotel, Dallas Worth Proposed Renaissance, Houston Proposed Full-Service Hotel at Proposed Hotel – West 7th, Fort Worth Westin Oaks & Galleria, Houston Cityplace, Dallas Proposed La Quinta, Fort Worth Country Inn & Suites, Irving Proposed Full-Service Hotel at Design Proposed SpringHill Suites by Courtyard Dallas Las Colinas, Irving District, Dallas Marriott, Fort Worth DoubleTree DFW Airport North, Irving Proposed Hotel at Baylor, Dallas Proposed Staybridge Suites, Fort Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas Proposed NYLO, Dallas Worth Irving Las Colinas, Irving Renaissance Dallas Market Center, Staybridge Suites Fort Worth Fossil Proposed Hotel Irving 555 West Dallas Creek, Fort Worth Airport Freeway, Irving Ritz-Carlton, Dallas TownePlace Suites by Marriott, Fort Proposed Hotel, Irving Rosewood Crescent Hotel, Dallas Worth Proposed TownePlace Suites by Sheraton Dallas North, Dallas Holiday Inn Express, Frisco Marriott, Irving Sun Suites of Dallas Garland, Dallas Proposed Autograph Hotel at The Gate, Proposed Value Place, Irving Wyndham Galleria, Dallas Frisco Residence Inn by Marriott, Irving Hampton Inn & Suites, Decatur Proposed by Hilton Hall Park, Wyndham Las Colinas, Irving Proposed Hotel at Civic Center, Frisco Residence Inn by Marriott, Killeen Decatur Proposed Hilton Garden Inn, Frisco Hampton Inn, Laredo Proposed Select-Service Hotel at Civic Proposed NYLO Hotel, Frisco Proposed Hampton Inn & Suites, Center, Decatur Proposed Zaza, Frisco Lewisville Holiday Inn & Suites Denton Holiday Inn Express & Suites Garland Sun Suites, Lewisville University Area, Denton East Lake Hubbard Interstate 30, Homewood Suites by Hilton, Longview Proposed Select-Service Hotel, Garland Motel 6, Longview Edinburg Proposed Hotel, Grand Prairie Proposed Hotel Lubbock, Lubbock Proposed Limited- or Select-Service Courtyard/TownePlace Suites by Value Place, Lubbock Hotel, El Paso Marriott, Grapevine La Quinta Inn & Suites, Mansfield Proposed Hotel, Farmers Branch Great Wolf Lodge, Grapevine Proposed Select-Service Hotel, Proposed TownePlace Suites by Hilton DFW, Grapevine Mansfield Marriott, Farmers Branch Proposed Courtyard by Marriott, Residence Inn, McAllen Pearl on the Peninsula, Flower Mound Grapevine Hampton Inn & Suites, McKinney Proposed Hotel, Flower Mound Proposed Renaissance – Silver Lake Proposed Craig Ranch Hotel, McKinney Proposed Unscripted Hotel at Crossing, Grapevine Proposed Hotel, McKinney Lakeside, Flower Mound Proposed TownePlace Suites by Holiday Inn Express, Monahans Comfort Suites, Fort Worth Marriott, Grapevine Microtel Inn & Suites by Wyndham, by Wyndham Fort Residence Inn by Marriott, Grapevine Monahans Worth Medical Center, Fort Worth TownePlace Suites Dallas Grapevine, Proposed Microtel Inn & Suites, Hilton Garden Inn, Fort Worth Grapevine Monahans La Quinta Inns & Suites Forest Hill, Proposed Hotel Haslet, Haslet , Odessa Fort Worth Proposed Hotel, Highland Village Commercial Land, Paris Marriott Hotel & Golf Club Champions Courtyard by Marriott Houston DoubleTree, Plano Circle Fort Worth, Fort Worth Brookhollow, Houston Homewood Suites by Hilton, Plano Proposed Aloft Hotel, Fort Worth Crowne Plaza Brookhollow, Houston Hyatt Place, Plano Embassy Suites, Houston Proposed Boutique Hotel, Plano

HVS, Dallas, Texas Qualifications of Kathleen Donahue 5

Proposed Hotel at Plano Centre, Plano Courtyard by Marriott, Wichita Falls Tokyo, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed La Quinta Inn & Suites, Plano Proposed Aloft, The Woodlands Assessment), Tokyo, Japan Staybridge Suites Plano Richardson, Camp Humphreys, (U.S. Army Lodging Plano U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Assessment), Korea Sun Suites, Plano Fort Buchanan, (U.S. Army Lodging Courtyard by Marriott Dallas Proposed Resort, St. Croix Assessment), Puerto Rico Richardson Spring Valley, Richardson UTAH Hyatt House, Richardson Park Royal, Acapulco Omni, Richardson Hilton Airport, Salt Lake City Radisson Resort, Ixtapa Proposed SpringHill Suites, Tooele Army Depot, (U.S. Army Dreams Resort, Puerto Vallarta Richardson Lodging Assessment), Tooele , Richardson Proposed Hilton, Rockwall VIRGINIA Ansbach, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Limited-Service Hotel, Assessment), Ansbach Rockwall Proposed Hilton Garden Inn, Babenhausen, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Hotel and Convention Center Alexandria Assessment), Babenhausen Bayside, Rowlett Radisson Old Town, Alexandria Bamberg, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Select-Service Hotel at Hilton Crystal City, Arlington Assessment), Bamberg Bayside, Rowlett Ritz-Carlton, Arlington Baumholder, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Courtyard by Marriott, San Fort A.P. Hill, (U.S. Army Lodging Assessment), Baumholder Angelo Assessment), Bowling Green Darmstadt, (U.S. Army Lodging Courtyard by Marriott North Stone TJAGSA, (U.S. Army Lodging Assessment), Darmstadt Oak at Legacy, San Antonio Assessment), Charlottesville Garmisch, (U.S. Army Lodging Days Inn, San Antonio Intown Suites Chesapeake/Greenbrier, Assessment), Garmisch Hilton Garden Inn San Antonio Airport, Chesapeake Grafenwoehr, (U.S. Army Lodging San Antonio Fort Monroe, (U.S. Army Lodging Assessment), Grafenwoehr JW Marriott Hill Country, San Antonio Assessment), Fort Monroe Hanau, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Fairfield Inn, San Antonio Richmond DLA, (U.S. Army Lodging Assessment), Hanau Proposed SpringHill Suites by Assessment), Richmond Kitzingen, (U.S. Army Lodging Marriott, San Antonio Fort Story, (U.S. Army Lodging Assessment), Kitzingen Proposed TownePlace Suites by Assessment), Virginia Beach Mannheim, (U.S. Army Lodging Marriott, Seguin Assessment), Mannheim Holiday Inn Express, Sherman WASHINGTON Schweinfurt, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Cambria Suites, Southlake Assessment), Schweinfurt Proposed Hotel, Southlake Days Inn, Ellensburg Wurzburg, (U.S. Army Lodging Proposed Westin, Southlake , Seattle Assessment), Wurzburg Candlewood Suites, Temple Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott, Residence Inn by Marriott, Temple Yakima Holiday Inn Express & Suites, Terrell Candlewood Suites, Texarkana INTERNATIONAL Hawthorn Suites by Wyndham, Tyler Residence Inn by Marriott, Tyler Proposed Hotel, Bahamas Courtyard by Marriott, Waco Camp Darby, (U.S. Army Lodging Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites, Assessment), Italy Waxahachie Camp Zama, (U.S. Army Lodging Fairfield Inn & Suites, Weatherford Assessment), Japan

HVS, Dallas, Texas Qualifications of Kathleen Donahue 6

You may wish to laminate the pocket identification card to preserve it.

The person named on the reverse is licensed by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board.

Inquiry as to the status of this license may be made to:

Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Tx 78711-2188 www.talcb.texas.gov (512) 936-3001 KATHLEEN DIANE DONAHUE Fax:(512) 936-3899 2601 SAGEBRUSH DR STE 101 FLOWER MOUND, TX 75028

Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Number#: TX1337633 G

Issued:12/12/2017 Expires: 12/31/2019

Appraiser: KATHLEEN DIANE DONAHUE

Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Douglas E. Oldmixon Commissioner

Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board P.O. Box 12188 Austin, Texas 78711-2188 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser

Number: TX 1337633 G Issued: 12/12/2017 Expires: 12/31/2019

Appraiser: KATHLEEN DIANE DONAHUE

Having provided satisfactory evidence of the qualifications required by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Act, Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1103, is authorized to use this title, Certified General Real Estate Douglas E. Oldmixon Appraiser. Commissioner