DOCSLIB.ORG

An Overview of Local Environmental Activism in Britain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Loughborough University Institutional Repository Thinking globally acting locally : an overview of local environmental activism in Britain This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an author. Additional Information: • A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fullment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University. Metadata Record: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/12165 Publisher: c Robert Vickers Please cite the published version. This item was submitted to Loughborough University as a PhD thesis by the author and is made available in the Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ • • Loughborough ., University I University Library AuthorlFihng. Title .........................................................V / C k:'£ RS . Class Mark ....................................................................T . Please note that fines are charged on ALL overdue items. 0403910978 11111111111111111111 I 1111111111111 Thinking Globallv Acting Locally: An overview of local environmental activism in Britain. By Rob Vickers Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University December 2010 © by Robert Vickers 2010 ~!:1;:3,10'_":' ft",""'-nn"""l"-'I") .'., . :-;'1" Univcl''''( v Cv!\ • Piikin~lcm Ubr:1ry Date ZS-/ID/lj Class -,- Ace OLf03Q 109,'3 No, , For H, B & G Abstract Over the last four decades national environmental groups have become an important means of political participation for many British citizens. Since the mid-1980s these organizations have established a number of local groups. There are still some gaps in our understanding of these groups, particularly relating to participation at the grass-roots level. This investigation examines the British environmental movement, focusing on those who become coordinators of local groups, and attempts to find the correlates of their environmental activism. The research reviews the existing empirical data relating to environmental activism, and theoretical accounts relating to participation. It also considers the significance of the emergence of post­ material values, and looks at the theoretical framework that informs environmental activism. The hypothesis that the conservation and ecology movements are effectively sub-groups within the broader ecology movement is tested, and the thesis explores the possibility that those who participate in these movements have different socio-demographic and cognitive profiles, and methods of activism. The history and development of environmentalism in Britain is discussed, revealing the fundamental differences between the conservation and ecology movements. To test the hypothesis a national, internet based, questionnaire was conducted. In total, 380 activists were surveyed, all of whom were coordinators of local environmental groups that were affiliated to one of six nationally prominent environmental organisations. The findings of the research indicated that although many national environmental organizations seem to have become closer together in terms of their core beliefs and objectives. There are some notable differences between conservationists and ecologists at the grass-roots level, particularly in relation to socio­ psychological variables, and means of participation. Key Words: Environmentalism, Conservation, Ecology, Green, Activism, Participation, Pressure Group, Social Movement. Abbreviations BTCV .............. British Trust for Conservation Volunteers CND .................. the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament DiY ......... Do it Yourself EEC •••...... European Economic Community EFl .............. Earth First! ERM .................. (European) Exchange Rate Mechanism EU ......... European Union FoE .............. Friends of the Earth G8 .................. Group of Eight GDP ......... Gross Domestic Product GM .................. Genetically Modified IMF ......... International Monetary Fund IPCC .................. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change MORI .................. Market and Opinion Research International MP ......... Member of Parliament NEP ......... New Environmental Paradigm NIMBY ......... Not-In-My-Back-Yard NVDA ......... Non-Violent Direct Action ONS •••••• 0 •• the Office of National Statistics OPEC •••• e •••• the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries PR ........... Proportional Representation RSPB ......... Royal Society for the Protection of Birds SPSS •••• 0- •••• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences TWT ........... The Wildlife Trusts UK ............ United Kingdom INWF ......... World Wildlife Fund 1 List of Tables 2.1: British Participation Rates in Higher Education: By Social 30 Class 4.1: Membership of selected United Kingdom environmental 66 organisations 4.2: Selected Environmental Concerns England and Wales 77 5.1: Percentage of Registered Electorate Who Actually Voted 90 1945-2005 5.2: Reported Political Action 1986 - 2000 96 6.1: United Kingdom Distribution of Real Household Disposable 110 Income 1971 -2000 7.1: Environmental Groups Initially Contacted 121 8.1: British Environmental Groups with Widespread National 129 Support 8.2: Possible Activities to Support an Environmental Cause or 130 Issue 8.3: Assessment ofthe level of Participation Undertaken by 131 Activists 8.4: Categorization of Unorthodox Activism 132 9.1: Number of E-Mails Sent Out in the First Wave of the Survey 147 10.1: What Respondents do 'in an Average Week' 159 10.2 Gender Balance 161 10.3: Age Distribution of Environmental Activists by Gender 162 10.4: Post-Materialism Four Item Battery 169 10.5: New Environmental Paradigm Statistics 174 10.6: Actions Undertaken in a 12 Month Period: Group 176 Coordinators Contrasted with the UK Population 10.7: Participation Statistics - Number of Orthodox Activities 177 Undertaken in the Last 12 Months 2 10.8: Coordinators Overall Level of Orthodox Participation 177 10.9: Unorthodox Actions Undertaken in the Last 12 Months to 178 Support Environmental Causes 11.1: Educational Attainment I Conservationist and Ecologists 183 Crosstabulation 11.2: Employment Sector I Conservationist and Ecologists 185 Crosstabulation 11.3: Chi-Square Test Employment Sector I Conservationist and 186 Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.4: Materialists and Mixed Types Combined I Conservationists 189 and Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.5: Chi-Square Test Materialists and Mixed Types Combined I 190 Conservationists and Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.6: NEP 3 Categories I Conservationists and Ecologists 193 Crosstabulation 11.7: Chi-Square Tests NEP 3 Categories I Conservationists and 194 Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.8: Post-Materialist I NEP Correlation 195 11.9: Four Sacrifice for Environmental Protection Questions 198 Combined I Conservationists and Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.10: Chi-Square Tests Four Sacrifice Questions Combined I 198 Conservationists and Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.11: Overall Willingness to Sacrifice I Belief about Economic 199 Growth Correlation 11.12: Unorthodox Campaigning I Conservationists and 204 Ecologists Crosstabulation 11.13: Chi-square Unorthodox Campaigning 204 11.14: Percentage of Conservationists and Ecologists who would 206 Never Consider Participating in Various Forms of Unorthodox Campaigning 3 List of Figures 3.1: The Composition of the Environmental Movement 33 3.2 Verba and Nie's Socio-economic Status Model 47 10.1: Highest Educational Qualification 158 10.2 Four Category Occupational Classification of Sample 160 Compared with that of the Working Age Population of Britain 10.3: Political Party Approval Rating 166 10.4: Post-Materialism Twelve Item Battery 170 10.5: New Environmental Paradigm Score 173 11.1: Potential Subdivisions within the Environmental Movement 182 11.2: Age Distribution of Conservationists and Ecologists 188 11.3: The 12 Item Battery Results for Conservationists and 191 Ecologists 11.4: Frequency of Participation 202 4 CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE. .............................................................................................. 8 The Ambiguity Surrounding the Environmental Movement... ........................ 8 Introduction ................................................................................................ 8 What is the Environmental Movement? ................................................... 10 Who is part of the environmental movement? ......................................... 11 What is Environmental Activism? ............................................................ 13 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................ 15 The Correlates of Environmental Activism .................................................. 15 Socio-demographic Factors and Environmental Activism ........................ 16 Cognitive Factors and Environmental Activism ........................................ 24 CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................ 32 The Theoretical Framework ........................................................................ 32 Conservation and Ecology ....................................................................... 32 Participation in Conservation Organisations, Ecology Organisations, Pressure Groups and Social Movements ...............................................
Recommended publications
  • Suggested Reading List

    Suggested Reading List

    Community Read 2013—Suggested Reading List We here at Longwood Gardens started thinking about Sand County Almanac as we began to seriously plan for our new Meadow Garden a few years ago. We have spent a considerable amount of time learning, reading, thinking and talking. The Longwood Library and Archives staff encourage you to continue your reading beyond Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold. Here, we review a short list of titles on the life of Aldo Leopold, the conservation movement (local and national), gardening thoughtfully in your own yard, and nature in our contemporary world. You will find these titles at public libraries, local bookstores, and elsewhere in your community. Let us know if you find these suggestions interesting and useful. Email us your comments at [email protected] Berry, Wendell. Bringing it to the table: On farming and food. Counterpoint, 2009. This book, introduced by Michael Pollan, brings together a selection of Wendell Berry’s best essays on farming, farmers and food. He writes cogently about the importance of connecting to one’s local environment. Berry’s writing centers around the fact that our connection to the land has been made abstract by the industrialized food system and, as a result, we are neglecting our care of it. He calls for a return to ethics in our relationship with the land through the food we eat and the local environments we live in. Bowe, Alice. High-impact, low-carbon gardening: 1001 ways to garden sustainability. Timber Press, 2011. This book is a good primer for gardeners wishing to start using more sustainable gardening practices.
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections

    Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections

    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
  • Kristen Gaston American Environmental Movement: From

    Kristen Gaston American Environmental Movement: From

    Kristen Gaston American Environmental Movement: From Preservation to Pragmatism The environmental movement of the twenty-first century encompasses a wide array of fields of study, such as sociology, political science, history, biology, and ecology. However, the movement began to truly take form and gain momentum in the mid-twentieth century as new environmental problems began to surface in the United States and around the world. The decades of the 1960s and 1970s in the United States marked a shift in the environmental movement‟s focus from one of preservation and conservation to one of practical and international solutions to emerging environmental concerns in American society. To understand this shift in focus, it is essential to have a basic understanding of the environmental movement prior to the 1960s. In the beginning of the twentieth century, a popular Progressive movement existed in the United States. The Progressives, according to Benjamin Kline, believed the materialism of the industrial boom “had eroded the purity of the American soul and simple values of the past.” With the realization that the country had gone as far west as possible, it had become increasingly important to use the nation‟s natural resources more responsibly.1 The Progressives and many Americans turned to the government to manage and regulate the conservation of nature‟s resources, believing this was the only way to effectively regulate the use of resources.2 Although Kline claims the conservation movement concentrated on creating “policy of responsible, efficient, and planned use of resources,”3 it appears that the Progressives focused mostly on the preservation of resources from the wilderness, specifically lumber.
  • Influence on the U.S. Environmental Movement

    Influence on the U.S. Environmental Movement

    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 61, Number 3, 2015, pp.414-431. Exemplars and Influences: Transnational Flows in the Environmental Movement CHRISTOPHER ROOTES Centre for the Study of Social and Political Movements, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Transnational flows of ideas are examined through consideration of Green parties, Friends of the Earth, and Earth First!, which represent, respectively, the highly institutionalised, the semi- institutionalised and the resolutely non-institutionalised dimensions of environmental activism. The focus is upon English-speaking countries: US, UK and Australia. Particular attention is paid to Australian cases, both as transmitters and recipients of examples. The influence of Australian examples on Europeans has been overstated in the case of Green parties, was negligible in the case of Friends of the Earth, but surprisingly considerable in the case of Earth First!. Non-violent direct action in Australian rainforests influenced Earth First! in both the US and UK. In each case, the flow of influence was mediated by individuals, and outcomes were shaped by the contexts of the recipients. Introduction Ideas travel. But they do not always travel in straight lines. The people who are their bearers are rarely single-minded; rather, they carry and sometimes transmit all sorts of other ideas that are in varying ways and to varying degrees discrepant one with another. Because the people who carry and transmit them are in different ways connected to various, sometimes overlapping, sometimes discrete social networks, ideas are not only transmitted in variants of their pure, original form, but they become, in these diverse transmuted forms, instantiated in social practices that are embedded in differing institutional contexts.
  • Editorial the “New Conservation”

    Editorial the “New Conservation”

    Editorial The “New Conservation” A powerful but chimeric movement is rapidly gaining the characters of older conservation icons, such as Henry recognition and supporters. Christened the “new con- David Thoreau, John Muir, and Edward Abbey, are de- servation,” it promotes economic development, poverty famed as hypocrites and misanthropes and contempo- alleviation, and corporate partnerships as surrogates or rary conservation leaders and writers are ignored entirely substitutes for endangered species listings, protected ar- (Lalasz et al. 2011). eas, and other mainstream conservation tools. Its pro- The new conservationists assume biological diversity ponents claim that helping economically disadvantaged conservation is out of touch with the economic realities people to achieve a higher standard of living will kin- of ordinary people, even though this is manifestly false. dle their sympathy and affection for nature. Because its Since its inception, the Society for Conservation Biology goal is to supplant the biological diversity–based model has included scores of progressive social scientists among of traditional conservation with something entirely dif- its editors and authors (see also letters in BioScience, ferent, namely an economic growth–based or human- April 2012, volume 63, number 4: 242–243). The new itarian movement, it does not deserve to be labeled conservationists also assert that national parks and pro- conservation. tected areas serve only the elite, but a poll conducted by Institutional allies and supporters of the new conser- the nonpartisan National Parks Conservation Association vation include the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the National Park Hospitality Association estimates the Long Now Foundation, the Nature Conservancy, and that 95% of voters in America want continued govern- the social-justice organization The Breakthrough Institute ment support for parks (National Parks Conservation (Nordaus & Shellenberger 2011).
  • Letter to US Senator Ron Wyden from 85

    Letter to US Senator Ron Wyden from 85

    June 30, 2013 Chairman Ron Wyden U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 405 Dirksen Senate Building, Washington, D.C. 20510 CC: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell U.S. Senate Speaker John Boehner, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Ed Markey U.S. House of Representatives Dear Chairman Ron Wyden and Members of Congress: In a January 30, 2013 letter to President Obama, you and fifteen of your colleagues in the U.S. Senate wrote that “pollution can cause asthma attacks, heart and lung disease, cancer, damage to the reproductive system, strokes, and premature death.” 1 You said that you “stand ready to work with [the President] to use available tools to provide stronger safeguards that will address dangerous air pollution.” With your clearly stated intentions on the public record, we, the undersigned, are writing to ask you to expand upon your laudable efforts on behalf of the health and well-being of all Americans by ending your support for the expansion of polluting industrial-scale biomass energy. While receiving many of the same taxpayer subsidies as genuinely clean energy sources which emit no pollutants, such as solar and wind, electricity-generating biomass facilities emit large quantities of health-damaging air pollution. For example, the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data shows that biomass incinerators emit 98% as much nitrogen oxides (NOx) as burning bituminous coal and higher levels of the most dangerous particulate matter (PM 2.5 , including ultrafine and nano particulates).
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)

    Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)

    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
  • January 10, 2019 Re: Legislation to Address the Urgent Threat Of

    January 10, 2019 Re: Legislation to Address the Urgent Threat Of

    January 10, 2019 Re: Legislation to Address the Urgent Threat of Climate Change Dear Representative: On behalf of our millions of members and supporters, we are writing today to urge you to consider the following principles as the 116th Congress debates climate change legislation and momentum around the country builds for a Green New Deal. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently warned, if we are to keep global warming below 1.5°C, we must act aggressively and quickly. At a minimum, reaching that target requires visionary and affirmative legislative action in the following areas: Halt all fossil fuel leasing, phase out all fossil fuel extraction, and end fossil fuel and other dirty energy subsidies. The science is clear that fossil fuels must be kept in the ground. Pursuing new fossil fuel projects at this moment in history is folly. Most immediately, the federal government must stop selling off or leasing publicly owned lands, water, and mineral rights for development to fossil fuel producers. The government must also stop approving fossil fuel power plants and infrastructure projects. We must reverse recent legislation that ended the 40-year ban on the export of crude oil, end the export of all other fossil fuels, and overhaul relevant statutes that govern fossil fuel extraction in order to pursue a managed decline of fossil fuel production. Further, the federal government must immediately end the massive, irrational subsidies and other financial support that fossil fuel, and other dirty energy companies (such as nuclear, waste incineration and biomass energy) continue to receive both domestically and overseas.
  • WORLD CONSERVATION STRATEGY Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development

    WORLD CONSERVATION STRATEGY Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development

    WORLD CONSERVATION STRATEGY Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development Prepared by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) with the advice, cooperation and financial assistance of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (F AO) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco) ~ '1 IUCN WWF The Symbol The circle symbolizes the biosphere-the thin covering of the planet that contains and sustains life. The three interlocking, overlapping arrows symbolize the three objectives of conservation: - maintenance of essential ecological processes and life-support systems; - preservation of genetic diversity; - sustainable utilization of species and ecosystems. WORLD CONSERVATION STRATEGY Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development Prepared by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) with the advice, cooperation and financial assistance of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (F AO) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco) 1980 ~ ~ IUCN WWF The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, UNEP or WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Copyright© IUCN-UNEP-WWF 1980 All rights reserved First published 1980 Second printing 1980 ISBN 2-88032-104-2 (Bound) ISBN 2-88032-101-8 (Pack) WORLD CONSERVATION STRATEGY Contents Preamble and Guide Foreword I Preface and acknowledgements ·II Guide to the World Conservation Strategy IV Executive Summary VI World Conservation Strategy 1.
  • The Too Polite Revolution

    The Too Polite Revolution

    THE TOO POLITE REVOLUTION Why the Recent Campaign to Pass Comprehensive Climate Legislation in the United States Failed Petra Bartosiewicz & Marissa Miley January 2013 Prepared for the Symposium on THE POLITICS OF AMERICA’S FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING Co-sponsored by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Scholars Strategy Network February 14, 2013 4-6 pm Tsai Auditorium, Harvard University CONTENTS Introduction..............................................................................................3 Opportunity of a Generation, or Was It?.................................................10 USCAP – The Ultimate Compromise.....................................................19 From Earth Day to Inside the Beltway....................................................28 Taking the House.....................................................................................38 Struggle in the Senate..............................................................................52 Grassroots vs. Big Green.........................................................................71 Conclusion...............................................................................................78 2 INTRODUCTION Passage of an economy-wide cap on greenhouse gas emissions has been one of the great, unrealized ambitions of the environmental movement of this generation. With the effects of global warming already in our midst, and environmental catastrophe very much a threat in this century, curbing man-made emissions of carbon dioxide, the gas that most significantly
  • Conservation Conversations

    Conservation Conversations

    CONSERVATION CONVERSATIONS Addressing 21st Century Conservation Challenges to Benefit Our People, Economy, and Environment A COLLABORATION AMONG: Conservation Conversations • Boise State University’s Andrus Center for Public Policy is an unprecedented • Colorado State University’s Salazar Center for North American collaboration among institutes Conservation and research centers at nine • Ecosystem Workforce Program the University of Oregon and universities that explores Oregon State University the conservation challenges • University of California-Berkeley’s Institute for Parks, People, and of the future and identifies Biodiversity specific policies, programs, and • University of Colorado’s Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural strategies to help secure the Resources, Energy, and the Environment at Colorado Law long-term health of the nation’s • University of Montana’s O’Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain natural resources, wildlife, and West landscapes, and broaden the • University of Wyoming’s Ruckelshaus Institute for Environment benefits for all Americans. and Natural Resources • Utah State University’s Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Content 4 Introduction 6 Biodiversity Conservation Effectiveness within US Protected Areas 8 Reframing Conservation as an Economic Driver and Stimulus to Rural Communities 10 Another Way of Knowing: Indian Tribes, Collaborative Management & Public Lands 12 From Parallel Play to Co-Management: Conserving Landscapes at Risk of Wildfire in the American West 16 Transboundary Conservation: Migration and Fragmentation Across Conservation Landscapes 20 Carbon Sequestration and Climate Justice in Cities 22 Environmental Justice, Equity, and Inclusion for Indigenous Americans 24 Conservation and Outdoor Recreation: Challenges and Solutions to Keeping Parks and Public Lands from Being Loved to Death Introduction At the beginning of the 20th century, a movement began to conserve America’s lands, waters, wildlife, and other natural and cultural resources.
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO Section 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission file number: 001-39120 US ECOLOGY, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 84-2421185 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) organization) 101 S. Capitol Blvd., Suite 1000 Boise, Idaho 83702 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (208) 331-8400 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share ECOL Nasdaq Global Select Market Warrants to Purchase Common Stock ECOLW Nasdaq Capital Market Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).