DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bethe Ansatz Heisenberg Model and Generalizations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Bethe Ansatz Heisenberg Model and Generalizations The Bethe Ansatz Heisenberg Model and Generalizations F. Alexander Wolf University of Augsburg June 22 2011 1 / 33 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Ferromagnetic 1D Heisenberg model 3 Antiferromagnetic 1D Heisenberg model 4 Generalizations 5 Summary and References 2 / 33 Although eigenvalues and eigenstates of a finite system may be obtained from brute force numerical diagonalization Two important advantages of the Bethe ansatz all eigenstates characterized by set of quantum numbers ! distinction according to specific physical properties in many cases: possibility to take thermodynamic limit, no system size restrictions One shortcoming structure of obtained eigenstates in practice often to complicated to obtain correlation functions Introduction Bethe ansatz Hans Bethe (1931): particular parametrization of eigenstates of the 1D Heisenberg model Bethe, ZS. f. Phys. (1931) Today: generalized to whole class of 1D quantum many-body systems 3 / 33 Introduction Bethe ansatz Hans Bethe (1931): particular parametrization of eigenstates of the 1D Heisenberg model Bethe, ZS. f. Phys. (1931) Today: generalized to whole class of 1D quantum many-body systems Although eigenvalues and eigenstates of a finite system may be obtained from brute force numerical diagonalization Two important advantages of the Bethe ansatz all eigenstates characterized by set of quantum numbers ! distinction according to specific physical properties in many cases: possibility to take thermodynamic limit, no system size restrictions One shortcoming structure of obtained eigenstates in practice often to complicated to obtain correlation functions 3 / 33 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Ferromagnetic 1D Heisenberg model 3 Antiferromagnetic 1D Heisenberg model 4 Generalizations 5 Summary and References 4 / 33 Basic remarks: eigenstates reference basis: {jσ1 : : : σN i} Bethe ansatz is basis tansformation z PN z z rotational symmetry z-axis ST ≡ n=1 Sn conserved: [H; ST ] = 0 z ) block diagonalization by sorting basis according to hST i = N=2 − r where r = number of down spins Ferromagnetic 1D Heisenberg model Goal obtain exact eigenvalues and eigenstates with their physical properties N X H = −J Sn · Sn+1 n=1 N X 1 + − − + = −J S S + S S + Sz Sz 2 n n+1 n n+1 n n+1 n=1 5 / 33 Ferromagnetic 1D Heisenberg model Goal obtain exact eigenvalues and eigenstates with their physical properties N X H = −J Sn · Sn+1 n=1 N X 1 + − − + = −J S S + S S + Sz Sz 2 n n+1 n n+1 n n+1 n=1 Basic remarks: eigenstates reference basis: {jσ1 : : : σN i} Bethe ansatz is basis tansformation z PN z z rotational symmetry z-axis ST ≡ n=1 Sn conserved: [H; ST ] = 0 z ) block diagonalization by sorting basis according to hST i = N=2 − r where r = number of down spins 5 / 33 block r = 1: one-particle excitations N X 1 ikn − j i = jki ≡ a(n)jni where a(n) ≡ p e and jni ≡ Sn jFi n=1 N with energy E = J(1 − cos k) + E0 magnons jki N one-particle excitations correspond to elementary particles “magnons” with one particle states jki Note: not the lowest excitations! Intuitive states Lowest energy states intuitively obtained block r = 0: groundstate jFi ≡ j " ::: "i with energy E0 = −JN=4 6 / 33 Intuitive states Lowest energy states intuitively obtained block r = 0: groundstate jFi ≡ j " ::: "i with energy E0 = −JN=4 block r = 1: one-particle excitations N X 1 ikn − j i = jki ≡ a(n)jni where a(n) ≡ p e and jni ≡ Sn jFi n=1 N with energy E = J(1 − cos k) + E0 magnons jki N one-particle excitations correspond to elementary particles “magnons” with one particle states jki Note: not the lowest excitations! 6 / 33 ! N block r = 2: dim= = N(N − 1)=2 2 X − − j i = a(n1; n2)jn1; n2i where jn1; n2i ≡ Sn1 Sn2 jFi 1≤n1<n2≤N Hj i = Ej i , 2[E − E0]a(n1; n2) = J[4a(n1; n2)−a(n1 −1; n2) − a(n1 +1; n2) − a(n1; n2 −1) − a(n1; n2 +1)] for n2 > n1 +1 2[E − E0]a(n1; n2) = J[2a(n1; n2) − a(n1 −1; n2) − a(n1; n2 +1)] for n2 = n1 +1 Systematic proceeding to obtain eigenstates block r = 1: dim= N N X j i = a(n)jni n=1 Hj i = Ej i , 2[E − E0]a(n) = J[2a(n) − a(n − 1) − a(n + 1)] 7 / 33 2[E − E0]a(n1; n2) = J[4a(n1; n2)−a(n1 −1; n2) − a(n1 +1; n2) − a(n1; n2 −1) − a(n1; n2 +1)] for n2 > n1 +1 2[E − E0]a(n1; n2) = J[2a(n1; n2) − a(n1 −1; n2) − a(n1; n2 +1)] for n2 = n1 +1 Systematic proceeding to obtain eigenstates block r = 1: dim= N N X j i = a(n)jni n=1 Hj i = Ej i , 2[E − E0]a(n) = J[2a(n) − a(n − 1) − a(n + 1)] ! N block r = 2: dim= = N(N − 1)=2 2 X − − j i = a(n1; n2)jn1; n2i where jn1; n2i ≡ Sn1 Sn2 jFi 1≤n1<n2≤N Hj i = Ej i , 7 / 33 Systematic proceeding to obtain eigenstates block r = 1: dim= N N X j i = a(n)jni n=1 Hj i = Ej i , 2[E − E0]a(n) = J[2a(n) − a(n − 1) − a(n + 1)] ! N block r = 2: dim= = N(N − 1)=2 2 X − − j i = a(n1; n2)jn1; n2i where jn1; n2i ≡ Sn1 Sn2 jFi 1≤n1<n2≤N Hj i = Ej i , 2[E − E0]a(n1; n2) = J[4a(n1; n2)−a(n1 −1; n2) − a(n1 +1; n2) − a(n1; n2 −1) − a(n1; n2 +1)] for n2 > n1 +1 2[E − E0]a(n1; n2) = J[2a(n1; n2) − a(n1 −1; n2) − a(n1; n2 +1)] for n2 = n1 +1 7 / 33 Note: only for A = A0 interpretation as direct product of two one-particle states, i.e. of two non-interacting magnons To summarize rewrite: i(k n +k n + 1 θ) i(k n +k n − 1 θ) θ k1 k2 a(n ; n ) = e 1 1 2 2 2 + e 1 2 2 1 2 where 2 cot = cot − cot 1 2 2 2 2 Translational invariance: Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ; Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ where λi 2 f0; 1;:::; N − 1g with λi the integer (Bethe) quantum numbers Two magnon excitations – eigenstates Solution by parametrization i(k1n1+k2n2) 0 i(k1n2+k2n1) a(n1; n2) = Ae + A e where A ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik1 ≡ eiθ = − A0 ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik2 with energy E = J(1 − cos k1) + J(1 − cos k2) + E0 8 / 33 To summarize rewrite: i(k n +k n + 1 θ) i(k n +k n − 1 θ) θ k1 k2 a(n ; n ) = e 1 1 2 2 2 + e 1 2 2 1 2 where 2 cot = cot − cot 1 2 2 2 2 Translational invariance: Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ; Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ where λi 2 f0; 1;:::; N − 1g with λi the integer (Bethe) quantum numbers Two magnon excitations – eigenstates Solution by parametrization i(k1n1+k2n2) 0 i(k1n2+k2n1) a(n1; n2) = Ae + A e where A ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik1 ≡ eiθ = − A0 ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik2 with energy E = J(1 − cos k1) + J(1 − cos k2) + E0 Note: only for A = A0 interpretation as direct product of two one-particle states, i.e. of two non-interacting magnons 8 / 33 Translational invariance: Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ; Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ where λi 2 f0; 1;:::; N − 1g with λi the integer (Bethe) quantum numbers Two magnon excitations – eigenstates Solution by parametrization i(k1n1+k2n2) 0 i(k1n2+k2n1) a(n1; n2) = Ae + A e where A ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik1 ≡ eiθ = − A0 ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik2 with energy E = J(1 − cos k1) + J(1 − cos k2) + E0 Note: only for A = A0 interpretation as direct product of two one-particle states, i.e. of two non-interacting magnons To summarize rewrite: i(k n +k n + 1 θ) i(k n +k n − 1 θ) θ k1 k2 a(n ; n ) = e 1 1 2 2 2 + e 1 2 2 1 2 where 2 cot = cot − cot 1 2 2 2 2 8 / 33 Two magnon excitations – eigenstates Solution by parametrization i(k1n1+k2n2) 0 i(k1n2+k2n1) a(n1; n2) = Ae + A e where A ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik1 ≡ eiθ = − A0 ei(k1+k2) + 1 − 2eik2 with energy E = J(1 − cos k1) + J(1 − cos k2) + E0 Note: only for A = A0 interpretation as direct product of two one-particle states, i.e. of two non-interacting magnons To summarize rewrite: i(k n +k n + 1 θ) i(k n +k n − 1 θ) θ k1 k2 a(n ; n ) = e 1 1 2 2 2 + e 1 2 2 1 2 where 2 cot = cot − cot 1 2 2 2 2 Translational invariance: Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ; Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ where λi 2 f0; 1;:::; N − 1g with λi the integer (Bethe) quantum numbers 8 / 33 Figure for N = 32 Karbach and Müller, Computers in Physics (1997) + = 3N 2 1 2 I + = N 1 2 I N(N − 1)=2 solutions: class 1 (red): λ1 = 0 + = N 2 1 2 I ) k1 = 0; k2 = 2πλ2=N; θ = 0 1 class 2 (white): λ − λ ≥ 2 2 1 ) real solutions k ; k 1 2 class 3 (blue): λ2 − λ1 < 2 ) complex solutions 0 0 N 1 k k 2 k1 ≡ 2 + iv; k2 ≡ 2 − iv Two magnon excitations – eigenstates Rewrite constraints θ k k 2 cot = cot 1 − cot 2 2 2 2 Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ 9 / 33 + = 3N 2 1 2 I + = N 1 2 I + = N 2 1 2 I 1 0 0 N 1 2 Two magnon excitations – eigenstates Rewrite constraints Figure for N = 32 Karbach and Müller, Computers in Physics (1997) θ k k 2 cot = cot 1 − cot 2 2 2 2 Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ N(N − 1)=2 solutions: class 1 (red): λ1 = 0 ) k1 = 0; k2 = 2πλ2=N; θ = 0 class 2 (white): λ2 − λ1 ≥ 2 ) real solutions k1; k2 class 3 (blue): λ2 − λ1 < 2 ) complex solutions k k k1 ≡ 2 + iv; k2 ≡ 2 − iv 9 / 33 Two magnon excitations – dispersion Nk1 = 2πλ1 + θ Nk2 = 2πλ2 − θ ) k = k1 + k2 = 2π(λ1 + λ2)=N Figure for N = 32 Karbach and Müller, Computers in Physics (1997) 4 C1 C2 λ λ C3 , 1= 2 3 λ λ C3 , 1= 2-1 )/J 0 2 (E - E 1 0 0 1 2 3 k 10 / 33 Figure for N = 32 Karbach and Müller, Computers in Physics (1997) 4 C1 C2 free magnons 3 )/J 0 2 (E - E 1 0 0 1 2 3 k Two magnon excitations – physical properties classification class 1 + 2: almost free scattering states, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Two-Body Study of Dynamical Expansion in the XXZ Spin Chain and Equivalent Interacting Fermion Model
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna Scuola di Scienze Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Fisica A two-body study of dynamical expansion in the XXZ spin chain and equivalent interacting fermion model Relatore: Presentata da: Prof.ssa Elisa Ercolessi Claudio D'Elia Correlatore: Dott. Piero Naldesi Sessione II Anno Accademico 2013/2014 "Do not read so much, look about you and think of what you see there." R.P. Feynman [letter to Ashok Arora, 4 January 1967, published in Perfectly Reasonable Deviations from the Beaten Track (2005) p. 230] Abstract Lo scopo di questa tesi è studiare l'espansione dinamica di due fermioni in- teragenti in una catena unidimensionale cercando di denire il ruolo degli stati legati durante l'evoluzione temporale del sistema. Lo studio di questo modello viene eettuato a livello analitico tramite la tec- nica del Bethe ansatz, che ci fornisce autovalori ed autovettori dell'hamiltoniana, e se ne valutano le proprietà statiche. Particolare attenzione è stata dedicata alle caratteristiche dello spettro al variare dell'interazione tra le due parti- celle e alle caratteristiche degli autostati. Dalla risoluzione dell'equazione di Bethe vengono ricercate le soluzioni che danno luogo a stati legati delle due particelle e se ne valuta lo spettro energetico in funzione del momento del centro di massa. Si è studiato inoltre l'andamento del numero delle soluzioni, in particolare delle soluzioni che danno luogo ad uno stato legato, al variare della lunghezza della catena e del parametro di interazione. La valutazione delle proprietà dinamiche del modello è stata eettuata tramite l'utilizzo dell'algoritmo t-DMRG (time dependent - Density Matrix Renor- malization Group).
    [Show full text]
  • IV.6 Attractive Hubbard Model
    Contents IV One-dimensional Hubbard model 3 IV.1 Limiting cases . 3 IV.2 Symmetries . 4 IV.3 Bethe Ansatz . 7 IV.4 Groundstate and metal-insulator transition . 14 IV.4.1 Groundstate . 15 IV.4.2 Metal-insulator transition . 17 IV.5 Excited states . 21 IV.5.1 Spin excitations . 21 IV.5.2 Particle-hole excitations . 22 IV.5.3 Excitations with double occupations . 24 IV.5.4 Classification of low-lying excitations . 26 IV.6 Attractive Hubbard model . 27 V Conformal invariance and correlation functions 29 V.1 Conformal invariance in statistical physics . 29 V.2 Application: Critical behaviour in restricted geometries . 32 V.3 Finite-size corrections and correlation functions . 33 V.3.1 Examples . 36 1 2 CONTENTS Chapter IV One-dimensional Hubbard model In this chapter we discuss the Hubbard model in one dimension1. In contrast to the models of localized spins that we discussed in Chapter 2, the Hubbard model has two different types of excitations, namely spin and charge excitations. This two-component structure is also reflected in the Bethe-Ansatz treatment of the model. In the following we will first show that the Hubbard model is solvable by Bethe Ansatz for any parameter values. Then we discuss the groundstate and the structure of low-lying excitations. But first we investigate some limiting cases to get a rough understanding of the underlying physics. Then the symmetries of the Hamiltonian are found which simplifies the analysis. IV.1 Limiting cases The one-dimensional Hubbard model on a chain of lattice sites is given by the Hamiltonian $# $# "! ©! ¡£¢¥¤§¦©¨ ¤ ¨ '& )(*& % % (IV.1.1) ,+ + ©! where , are fermionic creation/annihilation operators that satisfy the standard anticommu- - - - ! ! ! tation rules 546 ¦ ¦ 21 1 ¦ ¦ .
    [Show full text]
  • First-Principles Characterization of the Magnetic Properties of Cu $ 2
    First-principles characterization of the magnetic properties of Cu2(OH)3Br Dominique M. Gautreau and Amartyajyoti Saha Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota Turan Birol Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota (Dated: February 3, 2021) Low dimensional spin-1/2 transition metal oxides and oxyhalides continue to be at the forefront of research investigating nonclassical phases such as quantum spin liquids. In this study, we exam- ine the magnetic properties of the oxyhalide Cu2(OH)3Br in the botallackite structure using first- principles density functional theory, linear spin-wave theory, and exact diagonalization calculations. This quasi-2D system consists of Cu2+ S = 1=2 moments arranged on a distorted triangular lat- tice. Our exact diagonalization calculations, which rely on a first-principles-based magnetic model, generate spectral functions consistent with inelastic neutron scattering (INS) data. By performing computational experiments to disentangle the chemical and steric effects of the halide ions, we find that the dominant effect of the halogen ions is steric in the Cu2(OH)3X series of compounds. I. INTRODUCTION may indicate a multi-spinon or multi-magnon continuum. While the distorted crystal structure hosts parallel chains Low-dimensional magnetism can give rise to a host with ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic spin ordering, of exotic phenomena. For example, in quasi-1D sys- a complete picture of the magnetic ground state and ex- tems, the fractionalization of magnons into spinons has cited states of this compound remains unknown. A de- been both theoretically predicted and experimentally ob- tailed first-principles theoretical study on the magnetic served [1{3].
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Bethe Ansatz and Tensor Networks
    Algebraic Bethe Ansatz and Tensor Networks A Dissertation presented by You Quan Chong to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Stony Brook University May 2015 Stony Brook University The Graduate School You Quan Chong We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation Vladimir E. Korepin - Dissertation Advisor Professor, C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy Tzu-Chieh Wei - Chairperson of Defense Assistant Professor, C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy Dominik A. Schneble - Committee Member Associate Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy Scott Sutherland - Outside Member Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Algebraic Bethe Ansatz and Tensor Networks by You Quan Chong Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Stony Brook University 2015 We consider several exactly solvable models of strongly correlated elec- trons in one dimension, such as the Heisenberg XXX model, the supersym- metric t-J model and the Hubbard model. These models can be solved by using the method of graded algebraic Bethe ansatz. We use it to design graded tensor networks which can be contracted approximately to obtain a Matrix Product State. This overcomes a major shortcoming of current density matrix renormal- ization group (DMRG) methods which work well on the ground states, but have difficulty working with the excited states of such models. In addition, observables such as correlation functions are important as they are experimentally measurable, but have been analytically described in the double scaling limit only.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Exact Non-Abelian Vortices in Non-Relativistic Theories
    Quantum Exact Non-Abelian Vortices in Non-relativistic Theories Muneto Nitta,1 Shun Uchino,2 and Walter Vinci3 1 Department of Physics, and Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, Hiyoshi 4-1-1, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan 2DPMC-MaNEP, University of Geneva, 24 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland 3London Centre for Nanotechnology and Computer Science, University College London, 17-19 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AH, United Kingdom (Dated: September 29, 2018) Abstract Non-Abelian vortices arise when a non-Abelian global symmetry is exact in the ground state but spontaneously broken in the vicinity of their cores. In this case, there appear (non-Abelian) Nambu-Goldstone (NG) modes confined and propagating along the vortex. In relativistic theories, the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem forbids the existence of a spontaneous symmetry breaking, or a long-range order, in 1+1 dimensions: quantum corrections restore the symmetry along the vortex and the NG modes acquire a mass gap. We show that in non-relativistic theories NG modes with quadratic dispersion relation confined on a vortex can remain gapless at quantum level. We provide a concrete and experimentally realizable example of a three-component Bose- Einstein condensate with U(1)×U(2) symmetry. We first show, at the classical level, the existence 3 1 2 1 2 of S ' S n S (S fibered over S ) NG modes associated to the breaking U(2) ! U(1) on vortices, where S1 and S2 correspond to type I and II NG modes, respectively. We then show, by arXiv:1311.5408v2 [hep-th] 16 Jul 2014 using a Bethe ansatz technique, that the U(1) symmetry is restored, while the SU(2) symmery remains broken non-pertubatively at quantum level.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1606.02950V2 [Hep-Th] 24 Jul 2016
    Lectures on the Bethe Ansatz Fedor Levkovich-Maslyuk ∗ Mathematics Department, King's College London The Strand, WC2R 2LS London, United Kingdom Abstract We give a pedagogical introduction to the Bethe ansatz techniques in integrable QFTs and spin chains. We first discuss and motivate the general framework of asymptotic Bethe ansatz for the spectrum of integrable QFTs in large volume, based on the exact S-matrix. Then we illustrate this method in several concrete theories. The first case we study is the SU(2) chiral Gross-Neveu model. We derive the Bethe equations via algebraic Bethe ansatz, solving in the process the Heisenberg XXX spin chain. We discuss this famous spin chain model in some detail, covering in particular the coordinate Bethe ansatz, some properties of Bethe states, and the classical scaling limit leading to finite-gap equations. Then we proceed to the more involved SU(3) chiral Gross-Neveu model and derive the Bethe equations using nested algebraic Bethe ansatz to solve the arising SU(3) spin chain. Finally we show how a method similar to the Bethe ansatz works in a completley different setting, namely for the 1d oscillator in quantum mechanics. This article is part of a collection of introductory reviews originating from lectures given at the YRIS summer school in Durham during July 2015. arXiv:1606.02950v2 [hep-th] 24 Jul 2016 ∗E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Asymptotic Bethe ansatz equations in 2d integrable QFTs 3 3 Algebraic Bethe ansatz: building the transfer matrix 7 4 Algebraic Bethe ansatz: solving the SU(2) chiral Gross-Neveu model 11 4.1 Coordinate Bethe ansatz for the XXX Hamiltonian .
    [Show full text]
  • The Bethe Ansatz After 75 Years Murray T
    The Bethe ansatz after 75 years Murray T. Batchelor A 1931 result that lay in obscurity for decades, Bethe’s solution to a quantum mechanical model now finds its way into everything from superconductors to string theory. Murray Batchelor is head of the department of theoretical physics and a member of the Mathematical Sciences Institute at the Aus- tralian National University in Canberra. Hans Bethe introduced his now-famous ansatz to obtain which means that each eigenstate is a linear combination of the energy eigenstates of the one-dimensional version of basis states that all have the same number of down spins. In Werner Heisenberg’s model of interacting, localized spins in other words, the Hamiltonian for an array of L spins is a a solid.1,2 Although it is among Bethe’s most cited works and block-diagonal matrix, with one block for each number of has a wide range of applications, it is rarely included in the down spins. It is useful to think of each down spin as a qua- graduate physics curriculum except at the advanced level. siparticle, and the state of all up spins as the vacuum state. The 75th anniversary of the Bethe ansatz is appropriately The wavefunction for a single quasiparticle looks very marked by reflecting on the impact of Bethe’s result on mod- much like the wavefunction for a free particle in a ring: a ern physics, ranging from its profound influence on the field plane wave of the form exp(ikx), with an energy that depends of exactly solved models in statistical mechanics to insights on the wavenumber k, which itself must be an integer multi- into the subtle nature of quantum many-body effects ob- ple of 2π/L.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Integrable Systems: •Sine Gordon Theory, Massive Thirring Model, Δ Function Bose/Fermi Gas, Calogero Sutherland Systems
    QuantumQuantum IntegrableIntegrable systemssystems ““WhereWhere dodo theythey allall comecome from?”*from?”* SriramSriram ShastryShastry •Acknowedgements for discussions over many years, questions and help: •Emil Yuzbashyan , Boris Altshuler and Elliott Lieb (NJ) •Bill Sutherland (Utah) •Deepak Dhar (Mumbai) •Anon (skeptical) questioner in the audience *Eleanor Rigby 23rd August 2006, MUMBAI PLAN •Introduction •Classical Integrable systems: (Role of higher conservation laws or dynamical symmetries) “Solitons, classical and quantum” •Runge Lenz vector as example of dynamical symmetry. • KdV Equation, Non Linear Schroedinger Eqn, •Quantum Integrable systems: •Sine Gordon theory, Massive Thirring model, δ function Bose/Fermi gas, Calogero Sutherland systems. Lax Equations •Lattice models: XXZ, XYZ spin chains, Baxter’s eqns, Commuting transfer matrices •Recent work on energy level statistics/ level crossings: •Heilmann-Lieb, Yuzbashyan-Altshuler-Shastry •A recent work on a class of matrices( SS 2005- Journal of Physics A) •Open Questions Chris Eilbeck, Alwyn Scott and Martin Kruskal looking for The Scott Russell Aqueduct on the Union Canal Edinborough, Scotland a soliton ``I was observing the motion of a boat which was rapidly drawn along a narrow channel by a pair of horses, when the boat suddenly stopped - not so the mass of water in the channel which it had put in motion; it accumulated round the prow of the vessel in a state of violent agitation, then suddenly leaving it behind, rolled forward with great velocity, assuming the form of a large solitary elevation, a rounded, smooth and well-defined heap of water, which continued its course along the channel apparently without change of form or diminution of speed. I followed it on horseback, and overtook it still rolling on at a rate of some eight or nine miles an hour, preserving its original figure some thirty feet long and a foot to a foot and a half in height.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Hubbard Rings at U = ∞
    An Introduction to Hubbard Rings at U = 1 W. B. Hodge, N. A. W. Holzwarth and W. C. Kerr Department of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109-7507 (Dated: April 12, 2010) Using a straightforward extension of the analysis of Lieb and Wu, we derive a simple analytic form for the ground state energy of a one-dimensional Hubbard ring at U=t = 1. This result is valid for an arbitrary number of lattice sites L and electrons N · L. Furthermore, our analysis provides insight into the degeneracy and spin properties of the ground states in this limit. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION explicit results for some limiting cases are accessible to graduate level instruction and can give students some in- For nearly ¯fty years, the Hubbard model1 has been sight into many-body physics and some exercise in basic used to describe many-body e®ects in solids, capturing quantum mechanical principles for non-trivial systems. the dominant competition between the delocalizing ef- A common problem asked of students in an introduc- fects of the kinetic energy (with strength described by tory quantum mechanics course is to determine the en- a hopping energy t) and the localizing e®ects of the ergy and degeneracy of the ground state of a system. electron-electron repulsion (with strength described by In the present paper, we present a proof that the exact an on-site Coulomb energy U). Despite its simple form, ground state energy of the single band, one-dimensional it has provided signi¯cant insight into many-body prop- Hubbard model for the case that there are L lattice sites erties of solids such as metal-insulator transitions, high- (L · 1) with periodic boundary conditions and N elec- temperature superconductivity, and magnetic states2, trons (N · L) in the limit, U=t ´ u = 1 is µ ¶ largely because of the accessibility of its analytic and ¼N numerical solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Bethe Ansatz
    Notes on Bethe Ansatz Mikhail Zvonarev December 2, 2010 Coordinate and Algebraic Bethe Ansatz techniques are reviewed; the former is applied to the Lieb-Liniger model, and the latter to the Heisenberg model. Suggestions for the further reading are given. 1 Coordinate Bethe Ansatz Bethe Ansatz means \Bethe's substitution", the method is named after the work by Hans Bethe [1]. Bethe found eigenfunctions and spectrum of the one-dimensional spin-1=2 isotropic magnet (often called one-dimensional spin-1=2 isotropic Heisenberg model). I will demon- strate the usage of the Algebraic Bethe Ansatz on this model in the second part of my lecture. Next model was solved by coordinate Bethe Ansatz more than 30 years later [2]. This is a model of one-dimensional gas of bosons interacting via the δ-function potential. Since it was solved by Lieb and Liniger, it is often called the Lieb-Liniger model. I will demonstrate how coordinate Bethe Ansatz works using this model as an example. 1.1 Hamiltonian of the Lieb-Liniger model in the first and second- quantized form The Hamiltonian of the one-dimensional Bose gas with zero-range interaction potential is Z − y 2 y y H = dx [ Ψ (x)@xΨ(x) + cΨ (x)Ψ (x)Ψ(x)Ψ(x)]; (1.1) where the units have been chosen such that ~ = 2m = 1: The interaction constant c ≥ 0 has the dimension of inverse length. The dimensionless coupling strength γ is given by c γ = : (1.2) ρ The boson fields Ψ and Ψy satisfy canonical equal-time commutation relations: [Ψ(x); Ψy(y)] = δ(x − y); [Ψy(x); Ψy(y)] = [Ψ(x); Ψ(y)] = 0: (1.3) 1 The number of particles operator N is Z N = dx Ψy(x)Ψ(x); (1.4) and the momentum operator P is Z y P = −i dx Ψ (x)@xΨ(x): (1.5) The number of particles and momentum are integrals of motion: [H; N] = [H; P ] = 0: (1.6) The equation of motion for the Hamiltonian (1.1) − 2 y i@tΨ = @xΨ + 2cΨ ΨΨ (1.7) is called the quantum nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Spin−1/2 Chain Jorn Mossel
    Dynamics of the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin−1=2 chain Master's thesis Jorn Mossel Supervisor: Dr. Jean-S´ebastienCaux Universiteit van Amsterdam Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica August 4, 2008 Contents 1. Introduction 8 1.1. Historical overview . 8 1.2. More is different: solving the many-body problem . 8 1.3. Less is more: strongly interaction fermions . 9 1.3.1. Breakdown of Fermi liquid theory . 9 1.3.2. Exact solutions and integrability . 9 1.4. Spin-spin interaction . 10 1.5. Experimental realization: inelastic neutron scattering . 11 1.6. Numerical methods for solving lattice models . 12 1.6.1. Exact diagonalization . 12 1.6.2. Monte Carlo methods . 13 1.6.3. DMRG . 13 1.6.4. ABACUS . 13 1.7. Thesis outline and research questions . 13 2. Exact eigenstates of the XXZ model 15 2.1. Anisotropic Heisenberg chain: XXZ model . 15 2.1.1. Rotational symmetry . 16 2.1.2. Translational symmetry . 17 2.1.3. Symmetries in ∆ and h .......................... 17 2.2. The Bethe Ansatz for the XXZ model . 17 2.2.1. Wavefunction for down spins . 18 2.2.2. Eigenvalue equation . 18 2.2.3. A single down spin . 19 2.2.4. Two neighboring down spins . 19 2.2.5. General case . 21 2.2.6. Consistency relations . 21 2.3. The Bethe equations . 22 2.3.1. Bethe Ansatz for other models . 22 2.4. Parametrization . 23 2.4.1. Gapped anisotropic case: j∆j > 1..................... 23 2.4.2. Isotropic case: ∆ = 1 . 24 2.4.3. Gapless anisotropic case: j∆j ≤ 1....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometric Meaning of Bethe Equations Quantum K-Theory
    Anton Zeitlin Outline Quantum Integrability The geometric meaning of Bethe equations Quantum K-theory ~-opers and Bethe ansatz Anton M. Zeitlin Louisiana State University, Department of Mathematics AMS Sectional Meeting: Special Session on Geometric Methods in Representation Theory UC Riverside November, 2019 Some history of quantum integrable systems and Bethe ansatz Anton Zeitlin Outline Quantum Integrability Quantum K-theory ~-opers and Bethe ansatz Exactly solvable models of statistical physics: spin chains, vertex models 1930s: Hans Bethe: Bethe ansatz solution of Heisenberg model 1960-70s: R.J. Baxter, C.N. Yang: Yang-Baxter equation, Baxter operator 1980s: Development of "QISM" by Leningrad school leading to the discovery of quantum groups by Drinfeld and Jimbo Since 1990s: textbook subject and an established area of mathematics and physics. Geometric interpretations Anton Zeitlin Outline I Enumerative geometry: quantum K-theory Quantum Integrability Generalization of quantum cohomology in the early 2000s by A. Quantum K-theory Givental, Y.P. Lee and collaborators. Recently big progress in this ~-opers and Bethe ansatz direction by A. Okounkov and his school. P.Pushkar, A. Smirnov, A.Z., Baxter Q-operator from quantum K-theory, arXiv:1612.08723 P. Koroteev, P.Pushkar, A. Smirnov, A.Z., Quantum K-theory of Quiver Varieties and Many-Body Systems, arXiv:1705.10419 I Multiplicative connections, q-opers q-deformed version of the classic example of geometric Langlands correspondence, studied in detail by B. Feigin, E. Frenkel, N. Reshetkhin: correspondence between opers (certain connections with regular singularities) and Gaudin models. P. Koroteev, D. Sage, A. Z., (SL(N),q) -opers, the q-Langlands correspondence, and quantum/classical duality, arXiv:1811.09937 E.
    [Show full text]