Cadre De Gestion Environnementale Et Sociale Du PASD

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cadre De Gestion Environnementale Et Sociale Du PASD The World Bank République du Congo HAUT COMMISSARIAT A LA REINSERTION DES EX-COMBATTANTS Projet d’appui à la promotion des moyens de subsistance durables dans le Département du Pool en République du Congo Code du Projet : P149690 UNITE DE MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PROJET (UMOP) CADRE DE GESTION ENVIRONNMENTALE ET SOCIALE UNITE DE COORDINATION DU PROJET UCP Mars 2017 TABLE DES MATIERES ABREVIATIONS ET ACRONYMES .................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 5 RESUME NON TECHNIQUE ............................................................................................. 13 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 23 1.1. CONTEXTE DE L ’E TUDE ........................................................................................................................... 23 1.2. OBJECTIFS DU CGES ............................................................................................................................. 24 1.3. MÉTHODOLOGIE D ’ÉLABORATION DU CGES ............................................................................................ 24 1.4. STRUCTURATION DU RAPPORT ................................................................................................................ 25 1.5. DESCRIPTION DU PROJET ....................................................................................................................... 27 1.5.1. Composante 1 : Stimuler l’amélioration des moyens de subsistance ............................... 27 1.5.2. Composante 2 : Promouvoir l'utilisation durable de l'énergie ............................................ 29 1.5.3. Composante 3 : Gestion et administration du Projet .......................................................... 30 1.5.4. Coût de la mise en œuvre du Projet ...................................................................................... 31 2. ENJEUX ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET SOCIAUX DE LA ZONE DU PROJET .. 32 2.1. ENVIRONNEMENT BIOPHYSIQUE .............................................................................................................. 34 2.1.1. Le Relief ..................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.2. Le climat ..................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.3. Les Sols ...................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1.4. Le Réseau hydrographique ...................................................................................................... 35 2.1.5. La végétation ............................................................................................................................. 35 2.2. SITUATION ECONOMIQUE , SOCIALE ET SANITAIRE ................................................................................... 35 2.2.1. Economie ................................................................................................................................... 35 2.2.2. Démographie ............................................................................................................................. 36 2.2.3. Habitat et logement ................................................................................................................. 36 2.2.4. Eau potable et assainissement ............................................................................................... 36 2.2.5. Education – Alphabétisation .................................................................................................... 36 2.2.6. Desserte et désenclavement ................................................................................................... 37 2.2.7. Secteur sanitaire ....................................................................................................................... 37 3. CADRE POLITIQUE ET JURIDIQUE EN MATIERE D’ENVIRONNEMENT .. 37 3.1. CADRE POLITIQUE .................................................................................................................................. 37 3.1.1. Documents de politique environnementale .......................................................................... 37 3.1.2. Documents de politique sociale .............................................................................................. 38 3.1.3. Document de politique agricole .............................................................................................. 39 3.2. CADRE LEGISLATIF , JURIDIQUE ET REGLEMENTAIRE NATIONAL ................................................................. 40 3.2.1. Cadre législatif .......................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.2. Cadre réglementaire national .................................................................................................. 41 3.2.3. Cadre juridique en matière d’évaluation environnementale ............................................... 42 3.3. LES ACCORDS MULTINATIONAUX SUR L ’ENVIRONNEMENT ........................................................................ 43 3.3.1. Milieu aquatique ........................................................................................................................ 43 3.3.2. Milieu atmosphérique ............................................................................................................... 43 3.3.3. Gestion écologiquement rationnelle des produits chimiques et des déchets ................... 44 3.3.4. Gestion des ressources naturelles .......................................................................................... 44 4. POLITIQUES DE SAUVEGARDE DE LA BANQUE MONDIALE ....................... 45 4.1. POLITIQUES DE SAUVEGARDE APPLICABLES AU PROJET ............................................................................. 46 4.1.1. PO 4.01 : Évaluation Environnementale ................................................................................ 46 4.1.2. PO 4.09 : Gestion des Pesticides ............................................................................................ 47 4.1.3. Autre politique de sauvegarde applicable au Projet ........................................................... 47 4.2. COMPARAISON ENTRE LA PO 4.01 ET LA LEGISLATION NATIONALE .......................................................... 47 1 5. CADRE INSTITUTIONNEL DE LA GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTALE .......... 48 5.1. MINISTERE DU TOURISME ET DE L ’E NVIRONNEMENT (MTE) ................................................................... 48 5.1.1. Rôles de la DGE dans la mise en œuvre du CGES ............................................................... 49 5.1.2. Analyse des capacités environnementales et sociales de la DGE ...................................... 50 5.2. HAUT -COMMISSARIAT A LA REINSERTION DES EX-COMBATTANTS ............................................................ 50 5.3. MINISTERE DE L’A GRICULTURE ET DE L ’É LEVAGE ..................................................................................... 50 5.3.1. L’Unité de Mise en Œuvre du Projet (UMOP) ....................................................................... 50 6. IMPACTS ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET SOCIAUX POTENTIELS ET MESURES D’ATTENUATION DES IMPACTS NEGATIFS .............................................................. 51 6.1. METHODE DE CARACTERISATION DES IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 51 6.1.1. Critères d’évaluation des impacts ........................................................................................... 52 6.1.2. Importance de l’impact ............................................................................................................ 53 6.1.3. Grille de détermination de l’importance globale de l’impact .............................................. 53 6.2. IMPACTS ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET SOCIAUX POSITIFS ............................................................................... 54 6.2.1. Impacts environnementaux positifs ....................................................................................... 54 6.2.2. Impacts socioéconomiques positifs ........................................................................................ 54 6.3. IMPACTS ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET SOCIAUX NEGATIFS .............................................................................. 56 6.3.1. Les impacts environnementaux négatifs ............................................................................... 57 6.3.2. Impacts socioéconomiques négatifs ...................................................................................... 58 6.4. MESURES D ’ATTENUATION DES IMPACTS NEGATIFS .................................................................................. 59 6.5. CLAUSES ENVIRONNEMENTALES ET SOCIALES DES DAO ET MARCHES ....................................................... 63 7. PLAN CADRE DE GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE (PCGES) 63 7.1. PROCEDURE DE GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE DES SOUS -PROJETS ......................................... 64 7.1.1. Le processus de screening environnemental des sous projets .......................................... 64 7.1.2. Préparation et validation des évaluations environnementales
Recommended publications
  • CONGO: Peace and Oil Dividends Fail to Benefit Remaining Idps and Other
    CONGO: Peace and oil dividends fail to benefit remaining IDPs and other vulnerable populations A profile of the internal displacement situation 25 September, 2009 This Internal Displacement Profile is automatically generated from the online IDP database of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). It includes an overview of the internal displacement situation in the country prepared by the IDMC, followed by a compilation of excerpts from relevant reports by a variety of different sources. All headlines as well as the bullet point summaries at the beginning of each chapter were added by the IDMC to facilitate navigation through the Profile. Where dates in brackets are added to headlines, they indicate the publication date of the most recent source used in the respective chapter. The views expressed in the reports compiled in this Profile are not necessarily shared by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The Profile is also available online at www.internal-displacement.org. About the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, established in 1998 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, is the leading international body monitoring conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide. Through its work, the Centre contributes to improving national and international capacities to protect and assist the millions of people around the globe who have been displaced within their own country as a result of conflicts or human rights violations. At the request of the United Nations, the Geneva-based Centre runs an online database providing comprehensive information and analysis on internal displacement in some 50 countries. Based on its monitoring and data collection activities, the Centre advocates for durable solutions to the plight of the internally displaced in line with international standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article
    Available online at http://www.journalijdr.com ISSN: 2230-9926 International Journal of Development Research Vol. 08, Issue, 08, pp. 22400-22407, August, 2018 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLEORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS FIRST REPORT AND PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONS OF CASSAVA BROWN STREAK-LIKE ROOT NECROSIS IN CONGO REPUBLIC 1,2,Bakelana Zeyimo, 2Musben Zola, 7Laura Boykin, 6Justin Pita, 4,5Mvila Amand, 8Godefroid Monde, 3Mahungu Nzola, 3James Legg, 4Mpika, 2Lema ki Munseki and 2Tshilenge Kanana 1National Institute of Agricultural research and studies (INERA), DRC 2Kinshasa University (UNIKIN), Kinshasa, DRC, Republic of the Congo 3International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) 4Marien Ngouabi University, Brazzaville, Congo Republic 5National School of Agronomy and Forestry (ENSAF), Brazzaville, Congo Republic 6Western African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE), Abidjan, Ivory Coast 7University of Western Australia (UWA), Perth, Australia 8Faculty Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yangambi, DRC ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: In the last 10 years, the Cassava Brown Streak Disease has spread across Africa from the east Received 26th May, 2018 coast of Africa to central Africa. Similar root necrosis to cassava brown streak disease have also Received in revised form been identified in the Democratic Republic of Congo where the first symptoms were identified in 09th June, 2018 2002 in Kinshasa and Central Kongo province. In 2012, the presence of cassava brown streak Accepted 17th July, 2018 disease was confirmed in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. All attempts since 2002 in st Published online 31 August, 2018 western Democratic Republic of Congo to identify the cause of these root necrosis failed. In 2017, a team of scientists surveying the Luozi Territory in the Kongo central province, identified the Key Words: same root necrosis similar to cassava brown streak in several localities bordering the Republic of Cassava Brown Streak Disease, Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2004
    Post-Conflict Communities at Risk: The Continuing Crisis in Congo’s Department of Pool November 2004 i i Report Team: This report was researched and written by Caritas Congo and Catholic Relief Services (CRS). Funding to support this project came from CRS and Secours Catholique (Caritas France). Project Team Leader and Co-author: Joseph Curry - CRS Principal Researcher and Co-author: Cassandra Knight - Consultant Research Team Coordination: Placide Milongo, Alain Moukouri - Caritas Congo Caritas Congo and CRS hired and trained the field researchers specifically for this project. The teams spent several weeks in the field, enduring difficult conditions in the remote villages where they stayed, and several threatening incidents due to insecurity. The Field Researchers were: Guy Roger Bambi Sabine Mapembe Jean-Aimé Boloko Antoine Mantete Esaïe Binamika Grégoire Mi Antama Ambroise Benidio Jo Alfred Minsissila Stanislas Clotaire Bitoumbou Alice Miatsonama Ludovic Diantsompa A. Massolekele Mahoukou Chancelin Kimbembe Bantoly Alain Blaise Ngola Christian Kouyakaba Hermann Nzonzi Moutombo Guy Roger Kiyindou Antoinette Ngounga Massamba Joséphine Ndroma Clotaire Loubelo Nsiloulou Serge Alain Nganda Martin Loubaki Diabouétoutélamio Gilbert Dénnie Louenidio Ouaya Borgea Loudou Gallet Olive Parfait Samba Martin Loukami Edgard Stanislas Tsiakanou Calixte D. Loubayi Moutima Prisca Rolande Tsouba Saturnin Mandagui Jérôme_Toukanou Aymar Serge P. Mahoungou i Acknowledgements: From designing the research tools to editing the final report, many other individuals
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Congo (Brazzaville)
    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : REPUBLIC OF CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE) Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 8 April, 2005) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin de Balexert, 7-9 1219 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 5 AFTER TWO YEARS OF PEACE, INSECURITY PREVAILS AMID MASSIVE REHABILITATION NEEDS 5 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND 8 BACKGROUND 8 THE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANISATION OF CONGO-BRAZZAVILLE 8 GREED FOR PETROLEUM RENTS A MAJOR MOTIVATION FOR THE WARS 9 TENOUS CALM REIGNS IN THE POOL REGION AFTER FOUR MAJOR WARS BETWEEN 1992 AND 2003 (NOVEMBER 2004) 9 REPUBLIC OF CONGO STANDS AS ONE OF THE POOREST COUNTRIES IN AFRICA (2000) 12 REPUBLIC OF CONGO EXPERIENCED INCREASED STABILITY BETWEEN 2000-2002 13 MOST OF THE DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY IS VESTED DIRECTLY IN THE PRESIDENT AND HIS ADMINISTRATION 14 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS MARRED BY HOSTILITIES AND IRREGULARITIES (MAY 2002) 15 KEY EVENTS SINCE THE RETURN TO POWER OF SASSOU NGUESSO (1997-2002) 15 CONGO CHRONOLOGY FOR 2002 18 MASSIVE PRESENCE OF WEAPONS IN BRAZZAVILLE NEIGHBOURHOOD OCCUPIED BY DISPLACED FROM THE POOL REGION (MARCH 2005) 20 CAUSES OF
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Guide : Congo Opportunities for Investment
    Economic Guide : Congo Opportunities for investment FOREWORD FOREWORD Preface Preface “Marching toward development” Blueprint for society (2016–2021) by H.E. Mr. Denis Sassou N’Guesso, President of the Republic of the Congo “My profession of political faith, which has not once wavered since I assumed the responsibilities of state, is to contribute, without sparing the least effort, to carrying my country as far as possible down the road of development. I am dedicating the better part of my life to this mission. I cannot imagine Congo as anything other than a developed country. One by one, I have come to know all the obstacles erected along the long path that leads toward de- velopment. I have also undertaken the proper measure of efforts still to be made in order to remove the remaining obstacles that separate us from development. I am laboring and carrying out work that everybody can appreciate. For more than a year, the international situation has been depressed. Coupled with the dras- tic drop in crude oil prices are warning signs of a loss of impetus in the global economy. Some analysts are at the point of forecasting the arrival of a global economic financial crisis. The violent finan- cial impact caused by the collapse in the price of a barrel of oil has been harsh for Congo, an oil-produc- ing country. It is resisting. It is resisting well, undoubtedly because it is being led with confidence. Through these difficult times, there is no place for amateurism, apprenticeship, or retaliation. The relent- less work and its outcomes in favor of the people are deserving only of attention and interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Congo (Brazzaville)
    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : REPUBLIC OF CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE) Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 6 June, 2002) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 5 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 7 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT 7 TWO MAJOR WARS TOOK PLACE FROM JUNE TO OCTOBER 1997 AND FROM SEPTEMBER 1998 TO DECEMBER 1999 (1999-2000) 7 REPUBLIC OF CONGO STANDS AS ONE OF THE POOREST COUNTRIES IN AFRICA (2000) 9 REPUBLIC OF CONGO EXPERIENCED INCREASED STABILITY BETWEEN 2000-2002 9 DENIS SASSOU-NGUESSO ELECTED PRESIDENT (MARCH 2002) 10 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS MARRED BY HOSTILITIES AND IRREGULARITIES (MAY 2002) 11 KEY EVENTS SINCE THE RETURN TO POWER OF SASSOU NGUESSO (1997-2002) 12 CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 13 RECURRENT CIVIL WAR DURING 1990S FORCED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS FROM THEIR HOMES (2000-2001) 14 AN ESTIMATED 30,000 PERSONS TEMPORARILY DISPLACED FROM MINDOULI, SOUTH OF BRAZZAVILLE, DURING 2001 (OCTOBER 2001) 14 THOUSANDS OF CIVILIANS FLEE NEW FIGHTING BETWEEN THE ARMY AND NINJA MILITIA (APRIL 2002) 14 POPULATION PROFILE AND FIGURES 17 GLOBAL FIGURES
    [Show full text]