DOCSLIB.ORG

Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasins 27) Unit Hydrograph Validation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasins 27) Unit Hydrograph Validation Attachment 02.04.03-08E TVA letter dated February 8, 2010 RAI Response ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS/ENCLOSURES: Attachment 02.04.03-8E: Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasins 27) Unit Hydrograph Validation. CDQ000020080068 (41 Pages including Cover Sheet) Attachment 02.04.03-08E TVA letter dated February 8, 2010 RAI Response ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS/ENCLOSURES: Attachment 02.04.03-8E: Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasins 27) Unit Hydrograph Validation.. (41 Pages including Cover Sheet) NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEET/CCRIS UPDATE Page 1 REV 0 EDMS/RIMS NO. EDMS TYPE: EDMS ACCESSION NO (N/A for REV. 0) L58090511003 calculations(nuclear) I 5 8 0 9 1 2 3 0 04 41 Calc Title: Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasin 27) Unit Hydrograph Validation CALC ID TYPE ORG PLANT BRANCH NUMBER CUR REV NEW REV REVISION APPLICABILITY ~Entire calc (@ CURRENT CN NUC GEN CEB CDQ000020080068 1 2 Selecled pages [0 NEW No CCRIS Changes [I ACTION NEW El DELETE El SUPERSEDE El CCRIS UPDATE ONLY C (For calc revision, CCRIS REVISION R0 RENAME C DUPLICATE E] I (Venflier Approval Signatures Not been reviewed and no Required) CCRIS changes required) UNITS SYSTEMS UNIDS N/A N/A N/A DCN.EDC.N/A APPLICABLE DESIGN DOCUMENT(S) CLASSIFICATION See - Below N/A 'E' QUALITY SAFETY RELATED? UNVERIFIED SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS DESIGN OUTPUT SAR/TS and/or ISFS1 RELATED? (If yes, QR = yes) ASSUMPTION AND/OR LIMITING CONDITIONS? ATTACHMENT? SAR/CoC AFFECTED Yes[] No 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes[l No R YesEl No[] Yes[C No[@ Yes[l No 0 PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE NO PREPARING ORG (BRANCH) VERIFICATION METHOD NEW METHOD OF ANALYSIS HSSawyer (615) 252-4362 CEB See Page 7 [E Yes 0 No PREPARIER SIGNATL)RE DATE KER SIGJ TURE DATE Heather Smith Sawyer _Bill Hamilton VERIFIER SIGNATURE DATE APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE Bill_____ ,K~. 9'ct6~ ______1 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM/ABSTRACT ff\A1111 Validate the existing unit hydrograph for the subbasin of the Melton Hill dam watershed (subbasin 27) using the 1973 and 2003 floods of record. **EDCN-22404A (SQN), EDCN- 5401 BA(WBN), EDCN-Later (BFN) This calculation contains electronic attachments and must be stored in EDMS as an Adobe .pdf file to maintain the ability to retrieve the electronic attachments. MICROFICHE/EFICHE Yes El No 09 FICHE NUMBER(S) El LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY 0 LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO CALCULATION LIBRARY. ADDRESS: LP4D-C o LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO: TVA 40532110-20081 Page 1 of 2 NEDP-2-1 [10-20-20081 NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page la REV 0 EDSWRWS NO. EDMS TYPE: EDMS ACCESSION NO (NIA for REV. 0) IWA 00 .cacuatons(nuclesr) 1 58 0) 0 5 11 Cl-Title: talculation of Initial Flood Flows from Subbasin 27 (Melton Hill Local) for Use in the SOCH Model Calibration and Subsequent Unit Hydrograph Validation NUM1ER C NEwRm REVISION CALC ID TYPE R PLNT R .... APPLICABILI.TY CURRENT CN NUC Entire calc I Selected pages 0 NEW 6N NUC GEN CEB CDQ000020080068 N/A 0 No CCRIS Changes C] ACTION NEW [ DELETE [1 SUPERSEDE [0 CCRIS UPDATE ONLY 0 (Fio cNc revision, CCRIS REVISION 0 RENAME 0 DUPLICATE 0 (Verifier Approval Signatures Not been reviewed and no I Required) CCRIS changes required) UNrs NIDS WA NWA N/A DCN.ED .N/A APPUCABLE DESIGN DOCUMENT(S) CLASSIFICATION NIA WA "E . SAFETY UNVERIFEDI SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS DESIGN OUTPUT SARTMS and/or ISFSI BEL RE (If yes, .ASSMPTION ANOR LHMENT? SAR/CoC AFFECTED OR=yes) Yes[I No Yesr No Yes U No 0 Yes 0 No 0 YesI NoQ PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE NO PREPARING ORG (BRANCHi VERIFICATioNMETHOD NEW METHODaOF ANALYSIS THJACKSO (301) 228-8323 Bechtel (CEB) Design Review U Yes 0 No PREPARER SIGMA DATE CHECKER SIGNATUR DATE Thomas H.Jac~o 5__S_09 MatWtiaC. Gamey go VERIFIER SI'GN•ATURE / . , DATE .aPRVLSGTR At/.. DATE STTMENT OF PROBIL14ASR B I)' ' J •; L' Generate initial local inflow hydrographs for Subbasin 27 (Melton Hill Local) for the March 1973 and May 2003 floods for use In SOCH model calibration and subsequent unit hydrograph validation. This calculationcontains electronic attachments and must be stored In EDMS as an Adobe .pdf file to maintain the abilltv to retrieve the electronic attachments. MICROFICHE(EFICHE Yes Q No E FICHE NUMBER(S) O LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY [ LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO CALCULATION MBRARY. ADDRESS: LP4D-C O LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO. NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEET/CCRIS UPDATE Page lb REV 0 EDMS/RIMS NO, EDMS TYPE: EDMS ACCESSION NO (NI/A for REV. 0) L58090511003 calculations(nuclear) L 5 8 0 9 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 Cale Title: Melton Hill Darn Local Watershed (Subbasin 27) Unit Hydrograph Validation CALC ID TYPE ORG PLANT BRANCH NUMBER CUR REV NEW REV REVISION APPLICABILITY 1 Entire calc R CN NUC GEN CEB CDQ000020080068 0 CURRENT Selected pages El NEW CN NUC SI No CCRIS Changes El ACTION NEW El DELETE El SUPERSEUE 0 CCRIS UPDATE ONLY El (For calc revision, CCRIS REVISION (0 RENAME 0 DUPLICATE El (Verifier Approval Signatures Not been reviewed and no Required) CCRIS changes required) UNITS SYSTEMS UNIDS N/A N/A N/A DCNEDC,N/A APPLICABLE DESIGN DOCUMENT(S) CLASSIFICATION See - Below N/A "E" QUALITY SAFETY RELATED? UNVERIFIED SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS DESIGN OUTPUT SA-R/TS anidlor ISFS1 RELAT ED? (If yes, OR = yes) ASSUMPTION AND/OR LIMITING CONDITIONS? ATTACHMENT? SAR/CoC AFFECTED Yes 0 NoEl Yes[] No l Yesm No l Yes 0 No Z YesEl No[) Yes 0 No[E PREPARER ID PREPARER PHONE NO PREPARING ORG (BRANCH) VERIFICATION METHOD NEW METHOD OF ANALYSIS HSSa'yer (615) 252-4362 BWSC (CEB) Design Review E1Yes ED No RER SIGNATURE DATE CHECKER SIGNATURE DATE Healr Smh Saawyer Bi VERIFIER SIGN TURE DATE APPRO AL SIGNATURE DATE Bill 4Hamllon '" ri/-£'/ x• :l/•t STATEMENT OF PROBLEMIABSTRACT Validate the existing unit hydrograph for the subbasir of the Melton Hill dam watershed (subbasin 27) using the 1973 and 2003 floods of record. **EDCN-22404 (SQN), EDCN- 54018(WBN), EDCN-Later (BFN) This calculation contains electronic attachments and must be stored in EDMS as an Adobe .pdf file to maintain the ability to retrieve the electronic attachments. MICROFICHE/EFICHE Yes El No 0 FICHE NUMBER(S) El LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY 0 LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO CALCULATION LIBRARY. ADDRESS: LP4D-C El LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO: NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEET/CCRIS UPDATE Page 2 CALC ID I TYPE IORG I PLANT I BRANCH I NUMBER I REV i CEB CDQ000020080068 21 CN NUC GEN ALTERNATE CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION BLDG ROOM ELEV COORD/AZIM FIRM Print Report Yes [ I BWSC CATEGORIES NA KEY NOUNS (A-add, D-delete) ACTION KEY NOUN A/D KEY NOUN (A/D _ CROSS-REFERENCES (A-add, C-change, D-delete) ACTION XREF XREF XREF XREF XREF XREF (A/C/D) CODE TYPE PLANT BRANCH NUMBER REV A P CO GEN CEB FLDHYDRO Version 1.0 CCRIS ONLY UPDATES: Following are required only when making keyword/cross reference CCRIS updates and page 1 of form NEDP-2-1 is not included: Heather Smith Sawyer Bill Hamilton PREPARER SIGNATURE DATE CHECKER SIGNATURE DATE PREPARER PHONE NO. EDMS ACCESSION NO. TVA 40532[10-20081 Page 2 of 2 NEDP-2-1 [10-20-20081 Page 3 NPG CALCULATION RECORD OF REVISION CALCULATION IDENTIFIER CDQ000020080068 Title Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasin 27) Unit Hydrograph, Revision 2 Revision DESCRIPTION OF REVISION No. 0 Initial issue 30 pages This calculation was revised to validate the existing unit hydrograph for the subbasin of the Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasin 27) using the 1973 and 2003 floods of record. As a result of this revision, the calculation title has been changed to reflect final validation of the local unit hydrograph. Significant changes to text are marked with a right-hand margin revision bar. Changes and Additions: Content on pages I - 11 on RO was modified as indicated on pages 1 - 12 of R1 (additional page added due to page content roll-over to following page) Content on pages 12 - 29 on RO was modified due only to content carry-over and is now equivalent to pages 12 - 30 of RI Content on page 30 of RO (the final page of RO) was replaced and new pages 31 - 36 were added. Calculation header was revised (Melton Hill Dam Local Watershed (Subbasin 27) Unit Hydrograph, Revision 1) on all pages revised. Added new electronic Attachments 4-1, 4-2 and 4-3. Total hardcopy pages Revision 1: 38 This calculation was revised to address the following: 2 " PER 203951-The verification of the original calculation was completed by personnel who had not completed the required NEDP-7 Job Performance Record (JPR). A verification JPR is now in place for all personnel engaged in verification tasks. Checking included only changes made in this revision as the checking of the calculation was not impacted by PER 203951. The verification is inclusive of work completed prior to this revision. * PER 203872- replace NEDP-2 forms on Pages 2 through 6 with the forms from the NEDP-2 Revision in effect at the time of calculations issuance. Significant changes in Revision 2 are noted with a right margin revision bar. Administrative changes and typos are excluded. The unverified assumption associated with the approval of the Nickajack SOCH.Calibration calculation, CDQ000020080040, has been removed. Final calibration has been completed and the calculation has been approved. Changes and additions: Content on pages 1-7, 9-10, and 31 - 35 RI has been modified as indicated on pages 1-7, 9-10, and 31-35, R2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tennessee Reservoir Fisheries Management Report 2001
    TENNESSEE RESERVOIR FISHERIES 18-03 STATEWIDE MANAGEMENT REPORT 2016 Tim Broadbent, Michael Clark, John Hammonds, Mike Jolley, Lyle Mason , Jim Pipas, and Wm. Patrick Black Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Fisheries Management Division P.O. Box 40747 Nashville, Tennessee 37204 TENNESSEE RESERVOIR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT REPORT 2016 TWRA Fisheries Report No. 18-03 By Tim Broadbent, Michael Clark John Hammonds, Mike Jolley, Lyle Mason, Jim Pipas, and Wm. Patrick Black Development of this report was financed in part by funds from Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration (Public Law 91-503) as documented in Federal Aid Project FW-6 ( TWRA Projects 1311, 1312, 1313, 2310, 2311, 3310, 3311, 3312, 3313, 3341, 4310, 4311, 4312, 4313, 7305, 7311, 7315, and 7397). This program receives Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U. S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity U. S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Page Regional Biologists…………………………………………………………………….……………….. 2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….………………. 3 Table of Reservoir Acreage……………………………………………………….…………………… 5 Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Region 1 Barkley…….………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Norris Dam State Park 125 Village Green Circle, Lake City, Tennessee 37769 / 800 543-9335
    Birds of Norris Dam State Park 125 Village Green Circle, Lake City, Tennessee 37769 / 800 543-9335 Waterfowl, great blue and green herons, gulls, osprey and bald eagle frequent the lake, and the forests harbor great numbers of migratory birds in the spring and fall. Over 105 species of birds have been observed throughout the year. Below the dam look for orchard and northern orioles, eastern bluebirds, sparrows and tree swallows. Responsible Birding - Do not endanger the welfare of birds. - Tread lightly and respect bird habitat. - Silence is golden. - Do not use electronic sound devices to attract birds during nesting season, May-July. - Take extra care when in a nesting area. - Always respect the law and the rights of others, violators subject to prosecution. - Do not trespass on private property. - Avoid pointing your binoculars at other people or their homes. - Limit group sizes in areas that are not conducive to large crowds. Helpful Links Tennessee Birding Trails Photo by Scott Somershoe Scott by Photo www.tnbirdingtrail.org Field Checklist of Tennessee Birds www.tnwatchablewildlife.org eBird Hotspots and Sightings www.ebird.org Tennessee Ornithological Society www.tnstateparks.com www.tnbirds.org Tennessee Warbler Tennessee State Parks Birding www.tnstateparks.com/activities/birding Additional Nearby State Park Birding Opportunities Big Ridge – Cabins, Campground / Maynardville, TN 37807 / 865-471-5305 www.tnstateparks.com/parks/about/big-ridge Cove Lake – Campground, Restaurant / Caryville, TN 37714 / 423-566-9701 www.tnstateparks.com/parks/about/cove-lake Frozen Head – Campground / Wartburg, Tennessee 37887 / 423-346-3318 www.tnstateparks.com/parks/about/frozen-head Seven Islands – Boat Ramp / Kodak, Tennessee 37764 / 865-407-8335 www.tnstateparks.com/parks/about/seven-islands Birding Locations In and Around Norris Dam State Park A hiking trail map is available at the park.
    [Show full text]
  • September 29, 2009 Janet C. Herrin, WT 10D-K Jeffrey T. Parsley, EB 3G
    Memorandum from the Office of the Inspector General September 29, 2009 Janet C. Herrin, WT 10D-K Jeffrey T. Parsley, EB 3G-C FINAL REPORT – INSPECTION 2009-12695-05 – REVIEW OF MELTON HILL DAM CAMPGROUND At the request of the Senior Vice President, Office of Environment and Research, we initiated reviews of the 11 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) managed campgrounds to determine if (1) campgrounds are being operated in accordance with the program intent and (2) campgrounds' operating controls are functioning as intended. This report addresses our findings pertaining to the Melton Hill Dam Campground. We found that the campground was operating under the program intent, which is to provide public areas for recreation. During our walkdown, we noted 14 out of 57 campsites were occupied. We found that the basic operating controls were the functions of the Maintenance Foreman for Facilities at Melton Hill Dam and Campground Host.1 In summary, we found the operating controls appear to be functioning as intended and campground guidelines were generally being complied with. However, we did note some minor overall program guideline inconsistencies. BACKGROUND TVA operates some 100 public recreation areas throughout the Tennessee Valley, including campgrounds, day-use areas, and boat launching ramps. TVA manages 11 campgrounds throughout the Valley and has set out specific campground rules in various TVA documents to help guide the maintenance and operation of these campgrounds. These documents include: • Stewardship Guideline 7.2.1 - TVA's Recreation Areas • Stewardship Guideline 7.1.4 - Developed Recreation Area Rules and Regulations • Stewardship Guideline 7.1.1 - Administration of Fee Campgrounds and Pavilion Reservations 1 The Campground Host is an individual who is allowed to stay at the campground free of charge in exchange for providing some oversight functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Guntersville Reservoir
    GUNTERSVILLE RESERVOIR Final Environmental Impact Statement and Reservoir Land Management Plan Volume I SEPTEMBER 2001 This page intentionally left blank Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: White Paper Project Name: Deeded Land Use Rights Project Number: 2009-57 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RECOGNITION OF DEEDED ACCESS RIGHTS IN THREE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLANS Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama; Norris Reservoir, Tennessee; and Pickwick Reservoir, Alabama PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 Prepared by: Richard L. Toennisson NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Phone: 865-632-8517 Fax: 865-632-3451 E-mail: [email protected] Page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RECOGNITION OF DEEDED ACCESS RIGHTS IN THREE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RESERVOIR LAND MANANAGEMENT PLANS GUNTERSVILLE RESERVOIR, ALABAMA; NORRIS RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE; AND PICKWICK RESERVOIR, ALABAMA TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 Issue The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) uses a land planning process to allocate individual parcels on its reservoir lands to one of six land use zones. After approval of a reservoir land management plan (LMP) by the TVA Board of Directors (TVA Board), all future uses of TVA lands on that reservoir must then be consistent with the allocations within that LMP. TVA’s Land Policy (TVA 2006) states that TVA may consider changing a land use designation outside of the normal planning process only for the purposes of providing water access for industrial or commercial recreation operations on privately owned back-lying land or to implement TVA’s Shoreline Management Policy (SMP). A change in allocation of any parcel is subject to approval by the TVA Board or its designee.
    [Show full text]
  • Norris Dam: to Build Or Not to Build? a Museum Outreach Program Jeanette Patrick James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2015 Norris Dam: To build or not to build? A museum outreach program Jeanette Patrick James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Cultural History Commons, Other Education Commons, Public History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Patrick, Jeanette, "Norris Dam: To build or not to build? A museum outreach program" (2015). Masters Theses. 44. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/44 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Norris Dam: To Build or Not to Build? A Museum Outreach Program Jeanette Patrick A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History May 2015 Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without all of the support I received throughout. I would like to thank my family and friends; while I chose to immerse myself in Norris Dam and the Tennessee Valley Authority, they were all wonderful sports as I pulled them down the river from one dam project to the next. Additionally, I do not believe I would have made it through the past two years without my peers. Their support and camaraderie helped me grow not only as a historian but as a person.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Lesson
    TENNESSEE SOCIAL STUDIES LESSON #1 OutOut ofof thethe DarknessDarkness Topic The Tennessee Valley Authority and the Great Depression Introduction The purpose of these lessons is to introduce students to the World• War I and the Roaring Twenties (1920s-1940s) role that the creation of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) • 5.16 Describe how New Deal policies of President Franklin played in the economic development of the South during the D. Roosevelt impacted American society with Depression. The length of these lessons can be adjusted to government-funded programs, including: Social Security, meet your time constraints. Student access to a computer lab expansion and development of the national parks, and with Internet connectivity is recommended but not required. creation of jobs. (C, E, G, H, P) Another option is for the teacher to conduct the lessons in a Tennessee in the 20th Century classroom with one computer with Internet connectivity and an LCD projector. • 5.48 Describe the effects of the Great Depression on Tennessee and the impact of New Deal policies in the state (i.e., Tennessee Valley Authority and Civilian Conservation Tennessee Curriculum Standards Corps). (C, E, G, H, P, T) These lessons help fulfill the following Tennessee Teaching Standards for: Primary Documents and Supporting Texts The 1920s • Franklin Roosevelt’s First Inaugural Address • Political cartoons about the New Deal • US.31 Describe the impact of new technologies of the era, including the advent of air travel and spread of electricity. (C, E, H) Objectives The Great Depression and New Deal • Students will identify New Deal Programs/Initiatives (TVA).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report This Subsection Contains Information Withheld Under 10 CFR 2.390(A)(3)
    Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 3, Environmental Report This Subsection contains information withheld under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(3) 2.5.3 Historic Properties This section of the Environmental Report (ER) focuses on a description of the existing archaeological resources and historic properties on and immediately adjacent to the Clinch River Property (Figure 2.5.3-1) and the Melton Hill Dam as well as the historic properties within a 10-mile (mi) radius of the center of the Clinch River Nuclear (CRN) Site (Figure 2.5.3-2). The 10-mi radius includes portions of Anderson, Knox, Loudon, Roane, and Morgan Counties as shown on Figure 2.5.3-2. As defined by Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR) 800.16 (I)(1), historic properties are those properties deemed eligible for listing or that are already listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). As a federal project requesting a permit from a federal agency, the Clinch River (CR) Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Project is subject to review and consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S. Code [USC] § 470 et seq.) and its implementing regulations 36 CFR Part 800. Additionally the CR SMR Project is subject to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 USC 3001 et seq.), the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 USC 470aa-mm), the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (42 USC 1996), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 469). A total of 59 recorded archaeological sites, four isolated finds (IF-1 [2015], IF-1 [2011], IF-2, IF-3), one non-site locality (NS-1), and one cemetery have been identified within or immediately adjacent to the approximately 1305-acre (ac) CR SMR Project archaeological Area of Potential Effect (CR SMR Project archaeological APE).
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Fishing
    Bank Fishing The following bank fishing locations were compiled by 4. Fish are very sensitive to sounds and shadows and can TWRA staff to inform anglers of areas where you can fish see and hear an angler standing on the bank. It is good without a boat. The types of waters vary from small ponds to fish several feet back from the water’s edge instead and streams to large reservoirs. You might catch bluegill, of on the shoreline and move quietly, staying 20 to 30 bass, crappie, trout, catfish, or striped bass depending on feet away from the shoreline as you walk (no running) the location, time of year, and your skill or luck. from one area to the other. Point your rod towards the All waters are open to the public. Some locations are sky when walking. Wearing clothing that blends in privately owned and operated, and in these areas a fee is re- with the surroundings may also make it less likely for quired for fishing. It is recommended that you call ahead if fish to be spooked. you are interested in visiting these areas. We have included 5. Begin fishing (casting) close and parallel to the bank these fee areas, because many of them they are regularly and then work out (fan-casting) toward deeper water. stocked and are great places to take kids fishing. If you’re fishing for catfish, keep your bait near the bottom. Look around for people and obstructions Bank Fishing Tips before you cast. 1. Fish are often near the shore in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculation CDQ000020080064, Revision 2, "Chickamauga Dam
    Attachment 02.04.03-08C TVA letter dated February 8, 2010 RAI Response ASSOCIATED ATTACHMENTS/ENCLOSURES: Attachment 02.04.03-8C: Chickamauga Dam Local Watershed (Subbasins 44B and 45) Unit Hydrograph Validation. CDQ000020080064 (42 Pages including Cover Sheet) C- NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEET/CCRIS UPDATE Page 1 REV 0 EDMSIRIMS NO. EDMS TYPE: EDMS ACCESSION NO (NIA for REV 01 L58090424004 calculations(nuclear) NAL 5 8 0 9 1 2ý -q 0 pa.0 Calc Title: Chickamauga Dam Local Watershed (Subbasins 44B and 45) Unit Hydrograph Validation CUR REV NEW REVAREVISION CALC I TYPE ORG PLANT BRANCH NUMBER APPLICABILITY CURRENT CN NUC GEN CEB CD00000020080064 1 2 Entire calc [R Selected pages El NEW f No CCRIS Changes L- ACTION NEW E] DELETE El SUPERSEDE 1l CCRIS UPDATE ONLY C] (For calc revision, CCRIS REVISION I RENAME 0 DUPLICATE I] (Verifier Approval Signatures Not been reviewed and no ____i Required) CCRIS changes required) UNITS SYSTEMS UNIDS MIAMINlA IIA Validate existing unit hydrographs for the subbasins of the Chickamauga Dam watershed (Subbasins 44B and 45) using the 1973 and 2003 floods of record. **EDCN-22404A (SQN), EDCN-54018 A(WBN), EDCN-LATER (BFN) This calculation contains electronic attachments and must be stored in EDMS as an Adobe .pdf file to maintain the ability to retrieve the electronic attachments. MICROFICHEIEFICHE Yes E7 No N FICHE NUMBER(S) C3 LOAD INTO EDMS AND DESTROY 0 LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO CALCULATION LIBRARY. ADDRESS: LP4D-C 0l LOAD INTO EDMS AND RETURN CALCULATION TO: TrVA 40532 (10-20081 Page 1 of 2 NEDP-2-1 [10-20-2008) NPG CALCULATION COVERSHEETICCRIS UPDATE Page la REV 0 EDMSS/RIMS NO.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Fish Consumption Advisory
    Alabama Fish Consumption Advisories 2018 Created by the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (ADCNR), and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Table of Contents Introduction 3 Statewide Advice for At-Risk Women and Children 4 Fishing and Your Health Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Why should I eat fish? 5 What is an advisory? 5 How does ADPH determine if a waterbody should have an advisory? 5 Why do we have advisories? 5 Are fish consumption advisories only in Alabama? 5 Why are some fish not safe to eat? 5 General rule of thumb 5 Why are only certain species of fish listed in the advisory? 6 How often are fish advisories updated? 6 How do fish become contaminated? 6 Why are the restrictions limited in area when actually fish travel? 6 What are the main contaminants in Alabama? 7 What do I need to know about mercury? 7 Health notes for adults 7 What do I need to know about PCBs? 7 What are the health effects of PCBs in pregnant women? 7 What do I need to know about PFOS? 8 Health information for adults 8 How can I reduce the health risks from contaminated fish? 8 What do I need to know about shellfish in Alabama to stay safe? 8 What about fish I buy instead of catch? 8 Does ADPH post signs on waterbodies with advisories? 9 Where can I get more information? 9 Cleaning and cooking fish to reduce PCBs 10 Understanding the Advisories 11 Alabama Fish Consumption Advisories Basins 12 Area 1: Tennessee Basin 13 Area 2: Escatawpa/Tombigbee/Mobile Basin 18 Area 3: Black Warrior/Cahaba Basin 22 Area 4: Alabama/Coosa/Tallapoosa Basin 25 Area 5: Perdido-Escambia/Choctawhatchee/Pea/Chipola/Chattahoochee Basin 29 Area 6: Alabama Gulf Coast 33 Index of Listed Waterbodies 34 Alabama Fish Consumption Advisories, ADPH, Released May 2018 2 Introduction Alabama has over 77,000 miles of rivers and streams, 41 public lakes and reservoirs, and some of the most varied fish habitat in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • X-10 Facility Time Line
    X-10 Facility Time Line MAJOR PROCESSES Plutonium Recovery (Graphite Reactor Fuel Processing), 1943-45 Graphite Reactor Operations, 1943-63 Solid Waste Burial Grounds, 1944-present Radioactive Lanthanum Processing, 1944-56 Low Intensity Test Reactor, 1950-68 Operation of Waste Disposal Pits and Trenches, 1951-70 The Homogeneous Reactor Test, 1953-61 Thorex Processing, 1954-60 The Aircraft Reactor Test, 1954-57 The Tower Shielding Facility, 1954-60 Process Waste Treatment Plant, 1957-76 Oak Ridge Research Reactor, 1958-87 Central Facility Reactors, 1958-87 High Flux Isotope Reactor, 1966-presents ORR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA 1944-46, Radioactivity in White Oak Dam 1944-present, Radionuclides, Metals, Tritium in White Oak Dam, Clinch River 1947, Radioactivity in Clinch River 1960-64, Radionuclides, 1970, Mercury in Melton Hill Reservoir 1984, Mercury, Organics, Radionuclides, Tritium in White Oak Creek, Clinch River Chemicals in Clinch River 1986, Mercury, Radionuclides in White Oak Lake 1986, Cs-137 in Watts Bar Reservoir 1988-present, Mercury in First, Fifth, White Oak Creeks Water Surface 1989-90, Metals, Organics, Radionuclides, in Clinch River 1990, Metals, Organics, Radionuclides, in Melton Hill, Norris, and Watts Bar Reservoir 1995-96, Clinch River/Watts Bar Remedial Investigations 1944-45, Radioactivity in White Oak 1972, Tritium in White Oak Lake Fish Creek Lake, White Oak Creek Fish 1962, SR-90 in Clinch River Fish 1976-77, Mercury in Clinch River Fish 1948-49, Radioactivity/Radionuclides in White 1962-63, Radionuclides in
    [Show full text]
  • First Roll Call the Conversation That Launched the Wilderness Society: Where Did It Take Place?
    First Roll Call The Conversation That Launched the Wilderness Society: Where Did It Take Place? William Cronon Among the best-known stories of the Wilderness Society is the one about how the organization first came into being. In October, 1934, four of the Society’s founders—Bob Marshall, Benton MacKaye, Harvey Broome, and Bernard Frank (along with Frank’s wife Miriam) were driving in the southern Appalachians for a meeting of the American Forestry Association that they were all attending. Their conversation turned to roads like the one they were on—pushing ever deeper into roadless areas in the high country— and they became increasingly animated as they shared their concerns about the negative impacts such roads might have on mountain landscapes. They finally pulled off to the side of the highway, climbed an embankment, continued talking and eventually decided to found an organization that would defend roadless areas against such intrusions. The following January, 1935, the Wilderness Society was incorporated. We symbolically reenact that conversation each year when members of the Governing Council gather around a campfire at Roll Call to talk about our shared love for wild places. Given the importance of Roll Call as one of the Society’s oldest rituals (as far as I’ve been able to determine, Roll Call itself began in the mid-to-late 1950s, at about the time that the campaign for the Wilderness Act began), you would think we would know where this conversation occurred. But we don’t. Usually we just say that it was somewhere in the southern Appalachians.
    [Show full text]