How Does the Corporate Bond Market Value Capital Investments and Accruals? Sanjeev Bhojraj Bhaskaran Swaminathan* Forthcoming in the Review of Accounting Studies Final Draft: June 2007 * Bhojraj is Assistant Professor of Accounting and Swaminathan is Partner and Director, Research at LSV Asset Management, Chicago, IL 60606. Email for Sanjeev Bhojraj:
[email protected] and Bhaskaran Swaminathan:
[email protected]. We thank David Brown, Joel Demski, Paul Hribar, Charles Lee, Scott Richardson, Jay Ritter, Richard Sloan and workshop participants at Cornell University, University of Florida, University of Illinois, University of Michigan, Prudential Equity Group’s 18th Annual Quantitative Research Conference, QRG Quantitative Equity Conference, the Journal of Accounting Research Conference and especially an anonymous referee for helpful comments. How Does the Corporate Bond Market Value Capital Investments and Accruals? Abstract This paper examines whether the mispricing of accruals documented in equity markets extends to bond markets. The paper finds that corporate bonds of firms with high operating accruals underperform corporate bonds of firms with low operating accruals. In the first year after portfolio formation, the underperformance is 115 basis points using an accrual measure that includes capital investments and 93 basis points using an accrual measure that is based only on working capital investments. The Sharpe ratios of the zero-investment bond accrual portfolios are comparable to those of the corresponding zero-investment stock accrual portfolios. The results are also robust to risk adjustments based on both a factor model consisting of the Fama and French (1993) stock and bond market factors and a characteristics model based on bond ratings and duration.