1 Director's Message
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SDSS DR7 Superclusters Morphology
A&A 532, A5 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116564 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics SDSS DR7 superclusters Morphology M. Einasto1,L.J.Liivamägi1,2,E.Tago1,E.Saar1,E.Tempel1,2,J.Einasto1, V. J. Martínez3, and P. Heinämäki4 1 Tartu Observatory, 61602 Tõravere, Estonia e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Physics, Tartu University, Tähe 4, 51010 Tartu, Estonia 3 Observatori Astronòmic, Universitat de València, Apartat de Correus 22085, 46071 València, Spain 4 Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Väisäläntie 20, Piikkiö, Finland Received 24 January 2011 / Accepted 2 May 2011 ABSTRACT Aims. We study the morphology of a set of superclusters drawn from the SDSS DR7. Methods. We calculate the luminosity density field to determine superclusters from a flux-limited sample of galaxies from SDSS DR7 and select superclusters with 300 and more galaxies for our study. We characterise the morphology of superclusters using the fourth Minkowski functional V3, the morphological signature (the curve in the shapefinder’s K1-K2 plane) and the shape parameter (the ratio of the shapefinders K1/K2). We investigate the supercluster sample using multidimensional normal mixture modelling. We use Abell clusters to identify our superclusters with known superclusters and to study the large-scale distribution of superclusters. Results. The superclusters in our sample form three chains of superclusters; one of them is the Sloan Great Wall. Most superclusters have filament-like overall shapes. Superclusters can be divided into two sets; more elongated superclusters are more luminous, richer, have larger diameters and a more complex fine structure than less elongated superclusters. The fine structure of superclusters can be divided into four main morphological types: spiders, multispiders, filaments, and multibranching filaments. -
1 Director's Message
1 Director’s Message Laura Ferrarese 3 Rocky Planet Engulfment Explains Stellar Odd Couple Carlos Saffe 7 Astronomers Feast on First Light From Gravitational Wave Event Peter Michaud 11 Science Highlights Peter Michaud 15 On the Horizon Gemini staff contributions 18 News for Users Gemini staff contributions ON THE COVER: GeminiFocus October 2017 Gemini South provided critical GeminiFocus is a quarterly publication observations of the first of the Gemini Observatory electromagnetic radiation from 670 N. A‘ohoku Place, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720, USA a gravitational wave event. / Phone: (808) 974-2500 / Fax: (808) 974-2589 (See details starting on page 7.) Online viewing address: www.gemini.edu/geminifocus Managing Editor: Peter Michaud Associate Editor: Stephen James O’Meara Designer: Eve Furchgott/Blue Heron Multimedia Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Gemini Partnership. ii GeminiFocus October 2017 Laura Ferrarese Director’s Message The Three Goals of a Year-long Vision Hello, Aloha, and Hola! I am delighted to address the Gemini community from my new role as the Observatory’s Interim Director. I will hold this position for the next year, while the search for a perma- nent Director moves forward. As I write this (beginning of September), I have been in Hilo, Hawai‘i, for almost two months, and it’s been an exciting time. I have enjoyed work- ing with the Gemini staff, whose drive, dedication, and talent were already well known to me from when I chaired the Observatory Oversight Council on behalf of the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA). -
Gemini North Telescope
Gemini North Telescope Image Credit: Gemini Observatory/AURA/Joy Pollard Gemini Observatory Legacy Image Gemini North Telescope Gemini Observatory Facts The Gemini Observatory is operated by the Association of Universities for The 8-meter Frederick C. Gillett Gemini North telescope is PRIMARY MIRRORS: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the located near the summit of Hawaii’s Maunakea — a long Diameter: 8.1 meters; 26.57 feet; 318.84 inches National Science Foundation on behalf Mass: 22.22 metric tonnes; 24.5 U.S. tons of the Gemini Partnership. dormant volcano rising 4,205 meters into the dry, stable air Composition: Corning Ultra-Low Expansion (ULE) Glass of the North Pacific. Gemini North was designed and built, Surface Accuracy: 15.6 nm RMS (between 1/1000 - 1/10,000 in part, to provide the best image quality possible from the thickness of human hair) ground for telescopes of its size. TELESCOPE STRUCTURES: United States Four significant features help the telescope achieve this Height: 21.7 meters; 71.2 feet; 7 stories (from “Observing Floor”) goal: (1) An ~20-centimeter-thin primary mirror on a bed of Weight: 380 metric tonnes; 419 U.S. tons Optomechanical Design: Cassegrain ; Alt-azimuth 120 hydraulic actuators; (2) a 1-meter-diameter secondary DOMES: Canada mirror capable of rapid tip-tilt corrective motions; (3) vents on the cylindrical walls to provide a smooth flow of air Height: 46 meters; 151 feet; 15 stories (from ground) above the primary mirror, and to regulate the temperature Weight: 780 metric tonnes; 860 U.S. tons (moving mass) Rotation: 360 degrees in 2 minutes of the air above the mirror to match the outside Thermal Vents: 10 meters; 32.8 feet (width – fully open) temperature; and (4) an adaptive optics system which Brazil GEOGRAPHICAL DATA: can correct for image blurring caused by atmospheric Elevation: Gemini North: 4,214 meters; 13,824 feet turbulence. -
Messier Objects
Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun. -
Noirlab Visual Identity V.1.0 — Noirlab Brand Manual “A Logo Is a Flag, a Signature, an Escutcheon, a Street Sign
NOIRLab Visual Identity v.1.0 — NOIRLab Brand Manual “A logo is a flag, a signature, an escutcheon, a street sign. A logo identifies. A logo is rarely a description of a business. A logo derives meaning from the quality of the thing it symbolizes, not the other way around. A logo is less important than the product it signifies; what it represents is more important than what it looks like. The subject matter of a logo can be almost anything.” Paul Rand VI 1.0 ii Table of Contents NOIRLab Visual Identity v.1.0 i » — NOIRLab Brand Manual i Introduction — about this manual 1 ● About NOIRLab 1 ● NOIRLab Design brief 3 » Logo 3 ● General branding principles 4 The NOIRLab Logo 5 ● NOIRLab logo variations 7 » Versions for colored backgrounds 7 » Appropriate and Inappropriate Uses 8 » Widescreen version (for special applications) 9 » Clear Space 9 » NSF and NOIRLab 9 NOIRLab Typeface 10 ● Quatro — Headlines, Subheads, & Callouts 10 ● Source Sans Pro — for sans serif body text 10 ● Freight — for serif body text 10 ● Fallback typeface: Arial — (sans serif) 10 ● Times New Roman — (serif) 10 Color Usage 11 ● Accent Colors 11 Additional Brand Elements 12 ● Watermark elements 13 ● Program Iconography 13 Applications of the Visual Identity 14 ● Letterhead 14 ● Presentation slides 15 ● Poster Templates 15 ● Social Media Posts and Events 16 ● Employee Access Badges 16 ● Conference Nametags 16 ● Office Door Signs 17 ● Controlled document template 17 ● Credit block for CAD drawings 17 Acknowledgments and Affiliations 18 ● Acknowledgments in scientific papers 18 ● Affiliations on conference badges, email signatures etc. 18 iii 2021.06.24 ● Suggested Email signatures 18 ● NOIRLab Scientific and Technical Staff Affiliations 19 ● Image and video Credits 19 ● Branding issues in press releases and other texts 19 ● Business Cards 20 Program logos 21 ● NOIRLab Program Logos 21 ● Cerro Tololo 22 ● Kitt Peak 22 ● Community Science and Data Center 23 ● The Gemini Observatory 23 ● The Vera C. -
Blow-Away in the Extreme Low-Mass Starburst Galaxy Pox 186
Blow-Away in the Extreme Low-Mass Starburst Galaxy Pox 186 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Nathan R. Eggen IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Dr. Claudia Scarlata September, 2020 c Nathan R. Eggen 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Acknowledgements Foremost I thank my advisor, Dr. Claudia Scarlata, for her guidance, support, and patience over the past 3 years. I am grateful for the advice and counsel of Dr. Evan Skillman, and Anne Jaskot for her contribution to the writing process. I thank Michele Guala for his insight into turbulent flows, and Kristen McQuinn and John Cannon for providing their data used in this work. This research made use of NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) and NASA's Astrophysical Data System. I also express gratitude to the Gemini Help Desk, which assisted the reduction process. i Dedication To Tolkien, who taught me that at times moving on is the best thing one can do. ii Abstract Pox 186 is an exceptionally small dwarf starburst galaxy hosting a stellar mass of ∼ 105 6 M . Undetected in H i (M < 10 M ) from deep 21 cm observations and with an [O iii]/[O ii] (5007/3727) ratio of 18.3 ± 0.11, Pox 186 is a promising candidate Lyman continuum emitter. It may be a possible analog of low-mass reionization-era galaxies. We present a spatially resolved kinematic study of Pox 186. We identify two distinct ionized gas components: a broad one with σ > 400 km s−1 , and a narrow one with σ < 30 km s−1 . -
An Outline of Stellar Astrophysics with Problems and Solutions
An Outline of Stellar Astrophysics with Problems and Solutions Using Maple R and Mathematica R Robert Roseberry 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Electromagnetic Radiation 7 2.1 Specific intensity, luminosity and flux density ............7 Problem 1: luminous flux (**) . .8 Problem 2: galaxy fluxes (*) . .8 Problem 3: radiative pressure (**) . .9 2.2 Magnitude ...................................9 Problem 4: magnitude (**) . 10 2.3 Colour ..................................... 11 Problem 5: Planck{Stefan-Boltzmann{Wien{colour (***) . 13 Problem 6: Planck graph (**) . 13 Problem 7: radio and visual luminosity and brightness (***) . 14 Problem 8: Sirius (*) . 15 2.4 Emission Mechanisms: Continuum Emission ............. 15 Problem 9: Orion (***) . 17 Problem 10: synchrotron (***) . 18 Problem 11: Crab (**) . 18 2.5 Emission Mechanisms: Line Emission ................. 19 Problem 12: line spectrum (*) . 20 2.6 Interference: Line Broadening, Scattering, and Zeeman splitting 21 Problem 13: natural broadening (**) . 21 Problem 14: Doppler broadening (*) . 22 Problem 15: Thomson Cross Section (**) . 23 Problem 16: Inverse Compton scattering (***) . 24 Problem 17: normal Zeeman splitting (**) . 25 3 Measuring Distance 26 3.1 Parallax .................................... 27 Problem 18: parallax (*) . 27 3.2 Doppler shifting ............................... 27 Problem 19: supernova distance (***) . 28 3.3 Spectroscopic parallax and Main Sequence fitting .......... 28 Problem 20: Main Sequence fitting (**) . 29 3.4 Standard candles ............................... 30 Video: supernova light curve . 30 Problem 21: Cepheid distance (*) . 30 3.5 Tully-Fisher relation ............................ 31 3.6 Lyman-break galaxies and the Hubble flow .............. 33 4 Transparent Gas: Interstellar Gas Clouds and the Atmospheres and Photospheres of Stars 35 2 4.1 Transfer equation and optical depth .................. 36 Problem 22: optical depth (**) . 37 4.2 Plane-parallel atmosphere, Eddington's approximation, and limb darkening .................................. -
And Ecclesiastical Cosmology
GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 101 GSJ: Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2018, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com DEMOLITION HUBBLE'S LAW, BIG BANG THE BASIS OF "MODERN" AND ECCLESIASTICAL COSMOLOGY Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia Pусскй Croatian „If two objects are represented by ball bearings and space-time by the stretching of a rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by the rolling of ball bearings over the rubber sheet in order to achieve a particular motion. A cosmological red shift occurs when ball bearings get stuck on the sheet, which is stretched.“ Wikipedia OK, let's check that on our local group of galaxies (the table from my article „Where did the blue spectral shift inside the universe come from?“) galaxies, local groups Redshift km/s Blueshift km/s Sextans B (4.44 ± 0.23 Mly) 300 ± 0 Sextans A 324 ± 2 NGC 3109 403 ± 1 Tucana Dwarf 130 ± ? Leo I 285 ± 2 NGC 6822 -57 ± 2 Andromeda Galaxy -301 ± 1 Leo II (about 690,000 ly) 79 ± 1 Phoenix Dwarf 60 ± 30 SagDIG -79 ± 1 Aquarius Dwarf -141 ± 2 Wolf–Lundmark–Melotte -122 ± 2 Pisces Dwarf -287 ± 0 Antlia Dwarf 362 ± 0 Leo A 0.000067 (z) Pegasus Dwarf Spheroidal -354 ± 3 IC 10 -348 ± 1 NGC 185 -202 ± 3 Canes Venatici I ~ 31 GSJ© 2018 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 102 Andromeda III -351 ± 9 Andromeda II -188 ± 3 Triangulum Galaxy -179 ± 3 Messier 110 -241 ± 3 NGC 147 (2.53 ± 0.11 Mly) -193 ± 3 Small Magellanic Cloud 0.000527 Large Magellanic Cloud - - M32 -200 ± 6 NGC 205 -241 ± 3 IC 1613 -234 ± 1 Carina Dwarf 230 ± 60 Sextans Dwarf 224 ± 2 Ursa Minor Dwarf (200 ± 30 kly) -247 ± 1 Draco Dwarf -292 ± 21 Cassiopeia Dwarf -307 ± 2 Ursa Major II Dwarf - 116 Leo IV 130 Leo V ( 585 kly) 173 Leo T -60 Bootes II -120 Pegasus Dwarf -183 ± 0 Sculptor Dwarf 110 ± 1 Etc. -
Astronomy 422
Astronomy 422 Lecture 15: Expansion and Large Scale Structure of the Universe Key concepts: Hubble Flow Clusters and Large scale structure Gravitational Lensing Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Expansion and age of the Universe • Slipher (1914) found that most 'spiral nebulae' were redshifted. • Hubble (1929): "Spiral nebulae" are • other galaxies. – Measured distances with Cepheids – Found V=H0d (Hubble's Law) • V is called recessional velocity, but redshift due to stretching of photons as Universe expands. • V=H0D is natural result of uniform expansion of the universe, and also provides a powerful distance determination method. • However, total observed redshift is due to expansion of the universe plus a galaxy's motion through space (peculiar motion). – For example, the Milky Way and M31 approaching each other at 119 km/s. • Hubble Flow : apparent motion of galaxies due to expansion of space. v ~ cz • Cosmological redshift: stretching of photon wavelength due to expansion of space. Recall relativistic Doppler shift: Thus, as long as H0 constant For z<<1 (OK within z ~ 0.1) What is H0? Main uncertainty is distance, though also galaxy peculiar motions play a role. Measurements now indicate H0 = 70.4 ± 1.4 (km/sec)/Mpc. Sometimes you will see For example, v=15,000 km/s => D=210 Mpc = 150 h-1 Mpc. Hubble time The Hubble time, th, is the time since Big Bang assuming a constant H0. How long ago was all of space at a single point? Consider a galaxy now at distance d from us, with recessional velocity v. At time th ago it was at our location For H0 = 71 km/s/Mpc Large scale structure of the universe • Density fluctuations evolve into structures we observe (galaxies, clusters etc.) • On scales > galaxies we talk about Large Scale Structure (LSS): – groups, clusters, filaments, walls, voids, superclusters • To map and quantify the LSS (and to compare with theoretical predictions), we use redshift surveys. -
NOAO NEWSLETTER from the Office of the Director
Director’s Corner NOAO NEWSLETTER From the Office of the Director .......................................................................................................................................2 ISSUE 118 | OCTOBER 2018 Science Highlights Looking Ahead to Looking Back in Time with DESI ....................................................................................................3 The Dark Energy Survey: The Journey So Far and the Path Forward ......................................................................5 Managing Editor A Reconnaissance of RECONS .......................................................................................................................................8 Sharon Hunt Discovering 12 New Moons Around Jupiter .................................................................................................................9 NOAO Director’s Office Community Science & Data David Silva “More Is Different” in Data-Driven Astronomy ..........................................................................................................11 Data Lab 2.0 Is Bigger and Better ...............................................................................................................................12 Science Highlights The US Extremely Large Telescope Program .............................................................................................................13 Tod R. Lauer “Science and Evolution of Gemini Observatory” Conference ...............................................................................14 -
The Galactic Center
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union IAU Symposium No. 303 IAU Symposium IAU Symposium 30 September – 4 October 2013 IAU Symposium 303 highlights the latest Galactic Center research by scientists from around the world. Topics vary from theory 303 Santa Fe, NM, USA through observations, from stars and stellar orbits through nearby black holes and explosive events, to the building blocks and transport of energy in galaxies similar to our own Milky Way. Highlights presented include: high-resolution, multi-wavelength 30 September – 303 30 September – 4 October 2013 The Galactic Center: large-scale surveys of molecular gas in the central molecular and 4 October 2013 The Galactic Center: dust zones of our Galaxy; studies of stellar populations and stellar Santa Fe, NM, USA orbits around the supermassive black hole Sgr A*; presentations of Santa Fe, NM, USA Feeding and Feedback theoretical models to explain the dusty S-cluster object (DSO) G2, Feeding and Feedback in as well as the general accretion and jet formation in the vicinity of Sgr A*; and discussions of large-scale γ -ray emission in the context in a Normal Galactic of energetic activity and magnetic fi elds in the Galactic Center. The volume concludes by looking ahead to future observing a Normal Galactic Nucleus Nucleus opportunities across the electromagnetic spectrum at very high resolution. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Editor in Chief: Prof. Thierry Montmerle This series contains the proceedings of major scientifi c meetings held by the International Astronomical Union. Each volume contains a series of articles on a topic of current interest in astronomy, giving a timely overview of research in the fi eld. -
Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018
Page 1 Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairman’s Chatter …...…………………….……….………..….…… 3 Andrew Gray …………………………………………...………………. 5 The Hyades Star Cluster …...………………………….…….……….. 6 At the Eye Piece …………………………………………….….…….... 9 The Cover Image - Antennae Nebula …….……………………….. 11 Galaxy - Part 2 ….………………………………..………………….... 13 Self-Taught Astronomer …………………………………..………… 21 The Month Ahead …..…………………...….…….……………..…… 24 Minutes of the Previous Meeting …………………………….……. 25 Public Viewing Roster …………………………….……….…..……. 26 Pre-loved Telescope Equipment …………………………...……… 28 ASSA Symposium 2018 ………………………...……….…......…… 29 Member Submissions Disclaimer: The views expressed in ‘nDaba are solely those of the writer and are not necessarily the views of the Durban Centre, nor the Editor. All images and content is the work of the respective copyright owner Page 3 Chairman’s Chatter By Mike Hadlow Dear Members, The third month of the year is upon us and already the viewing conditions have been more favourable over the last few nights. Let’s hope it continues and we have clear skies and good viewing for the next five or six months. Our February meeting was well attended, with our main speaker being Dr Matt Hilton from the Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit at UKZN who gave us an excellent presentation on gravity waves. We really have to be thankful to Dr Hilton from ACRU UKZN for giving us his time to give us presentations and hope that we can maintain our relationship with ACRU and that we can draw other speakers from his colleagues and other research students! Thanks must also go to Debbie Abel and Piet Strauss for their monthly presentations on NASA and the sky for the following month, respectively.