Iraqis Denied Right to Asylum by Bill Frelick

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iraqis Denied Right to Asylum by Bill Frelick 2 FMR IRAQ SPECIAL ISSUE Iraqis denied right to asylum by Bill Frelick Now that the international community is belatedly paying hosts of refugees changed after November 2005, however, when three attention to the existence of an estimated two million Iraqi Iraqis set off bombs which killed 60 refugees, Iraq’s neighbours are closing off escape routes people in three hotels in Amman. while the US and UK provide no meaningful support to refugees or the countries hosting them. Millions of IDPs The Jordanian authorities are now preventing the entry of single Iraqi and other war-affected and persecuted Iraqis are trapped men between the ages of 17 and and denied the fundamental right to seek asylum. 35. They have severely tightened temporary residency permits, almost Iraq’s neighbours are refusing heightening the desperation of those ensuring that the vast majority of entry and imposing onerous new still in Iraq trying to find a way out. Iraqis will become ‘illegal aliens’ passport and visa requirements and subject to deportation to Iraq. for Iraqi nationals. Saudi Arabia There are recurrent reports that is building a $7 billion high-tech Jordan left in lurch the authorities are turning Iraqis barrier on its border to keep Iraqis away at ports of entry for failure to out. Kuwait is equally categorical in Sandwiched as it is between the produce the new ‘G series’ passports, its rejection of Iraqis. The Egyptian Israel-Palestinian conflict and the a more tamper-resistant document authorities began imposing highly Iraq war, Jordan is bursting with than previously issued but which restrictive new procedures for Iraqis refugees, and now hosts the largest Iraqis can only obtain from the seeking entry. There is a discernible number of refugees, per capita, of Ministry of Interior in Baghdad by hardening of response among all the any country on earth. The Jordanian paying large sums of money, putting neighbouring countries, except Syria. authorities regard the Iraqis as up with long waits and enduring In some cases governments have ‘guests’, ‘temporary visitors’ or ‘illegal political and religious scrutiny by the taken restrictive measures based on aliens’. For the first three years of issuing authorities. In other cases, criteria that amount to particularly the war, Jordan remained generally border guards ask Iraqis about their odious religious discrimination, and tolerant of the large numbers of Iraqis religious identity and reject those A refugee both seriously undermine the right crossing its border and staying in who are or appear to be Shi`a. In family in to asylum and violate fundamental its territory, preferring to benignly some cases, Iraqis who had legal Ruweished principles of refugee protection. ignore the population, essentially residence in Jordan and valid travel refugee camp Policies of neighbouring states looking the other way and letting the documents but who returned to Iraq in neutral territory are causing separation of families, Iraqis fend for themselves. Jordan’s have been subsequently prevented between Iraq deepening the anxiety of refugees and history and tradition as one of the from reentering Jordan, resulting and Jordan. world’s most remarkably generous in separation from their families. UNHCR/P Sands FMR IRAQ SPECIAL ISSUE 2 Jordan has no refugee law to fall President Bush has yet to so much as countries have limited resources back on. It is not a signatory to the acknowledge the refugees’ plight, let and competing social needs both 1951 Refugee Convention and has no alone direct the US government to from their own citizens and from the asylum procedures. It insists on its bring the displaced to safety or even hundreds of thousands of Palestinian prerogative to tell its ‘guests’ when to provide adequate humanitarian refugees whom they host. Both they are no longer welcome and aid. In the past the US has often aided have legitimate security concerns must leave. Jordan has deferred the those persecuted for supporting and understandable interests and job of determining who is a refugee it—refugees from the Hungarian sovereign rights in the management to UNHCR. In March, UNHCR Revolt, the Bay of Pigs; since the of immigration. Their valid security decided that as there are now so Vietnam War, a million Vietnamese concerns can be addressed, in part, many Iraqi asylum seekers – and refugees have been resettled in the by registering asylum seekers and overwhelming evidence of high US, including tens of thousands of providing them legal status, as well levels of threat and danger in south South Vietnamese army veterans. as by providing them the means and central Iraq – individualised But the Bush administration has to live in safety and dignity. refugee status determinations been very slow to respond to Iraqi are not just unnecessary but an friends whose lives are now in As in any refugee crisis, the wider obstacle to providing protection. danger. Many of the displaced international community has a It started issuing refugee cards are the very individuals on whom collective responsibility to share the to all Iraqi asylum seekers the administration was relying to burden which should not fall simply appearing at its Amman office. build a pro-Western democracy on those countries that happen to in Iraq. By not acknowledging be at the receiving end of a mass Jordan has rejected this exercise them, to stave off admitting failure, refugee exodus. The preamble to of UNHCR’s mandate but without the Bush Administration shuns the 1951 Refugee Convention notes exercising its own responsibility in accountability for its own actions. that “the grant of asylum may place UNHCR’s place. It still refuses to unduly heavy burdens on certain call a refugee a refugee. It rejects In 2005 the US allowed only 202 countries” and that refugee solutions asylum seekers at the border, and Iraqi refugees to enter the country. “cannot therefore be achieved is now poised to deport even more Under increasing pressure to respond without international cooperation.” Iraqis back to face risk to life in Iraq’s to the refugee crisis and to rescue The international community must maelstrom of hatred and violence, refugees persecuted for their support uphold the right, enshrined in the including those who have been of the American initiative, the State Universal Declaration of Human issued UNHCR refugee documents. Department announced in January Rights, of all people to seek asylum 2007 its willingness to resettle up in other countries by insisting on Jordan needs international support to 7,000 Iraqi refugees this year. As the right of Iraqis still clamouring to care for refugees on its territory. of this writing, fiscal year 2007 is to get out of Iraq to reach safety The support should be quick half over and fewer than 100 Iraqi in neighbouring countries. and generous. But it cannot be refugees have been admitted to the unconditional. If Jordan wants US, a rate of admission even lower My organisation, Human the international community to than 2005. Even if the US were to Rights Watch, has called on help it assist the refugees, it must succeed in resettling 7,000 Iraqis in neighbouring states to: play by the rules when it comes to 2007, it would be but a drop in the protecting them. Allowing UNHCR ocean of two million Iraqi refugees n scrupulously observe the to perform its functions and abiding and another two million displaced fundamental principle of by the principle of non-refoulement is within Iraq. As minimal as the US non-refoulement – including fundamental to sharing responsibility response has been, the UK has not non-rejection at the border for refugee assistance and protection. even made the rhetorical commitment and ports of entry to admit Iraqis who are under threat for having worked for British forces in n admit at least temporarily all USA and UK’s special Iraq, much less provided meaningful Iraqi asylum seekers, Palestinian responsibility support to meet the humanitarian refugees and Iranian Kurdish needs of refugees in the region. The refugees residing in Iraq The countries that are bearing the US and the UK are conspicuously who are seeking asylum brunt of the Iraqi refugee crisis are failing to provide minimally adequate not the ones responsible for creating burden sharing to encourage Jordan n cooperate with UNHCR in the it. The US and the UK undertook and Syria to keep their doors open. registration of Iraqi asylum a war which has directly caused seekers and refugees thousands of deaths, widespread fear and suffering, and forced International and regional n provide renewable residency displacement, and which precipitated responsibilities permits and work authorisation a sectarian conflict that has caused for Iraqis registered by UNHCR additional violence, persecution Jordan and Syria demonstrated and massive displacement. As such, tolerance toward Iraqi refugees n ensure the right of all children, these two countries have a particular for the first few years of the war, regardless of residency status, responsibility both to refugees particularly by allowing asylum to free and compulsory primary and those still seeking refuge. seekers to enter and remain. Both education, as guaranteed 2 FMR IRAQ SPECIAL ISSUE UNHCR/J Wreford A refugee woman with her belongings on a Damascus street. in the UN Convention on n acknowledge responsibilities n urgently facilitate the the Rights of the Child for Iraqi refugees and IDPs evacuation of Palestinian by contributing quickly and refugees seeking to leave Iraq n ensure compliance with the generously – both bilaterally and principle of family unity by through UNHCR – to meet the n encourage Israel to allow allowing and facilitating the exit humanitarian and protection needs Palestinian refugees from of family members from Iraq and of Iraqi and Palestinian refugees Iraq to return to areas now their entry to countries of asylum from Iraq in Jordan, Syria and administered by the Palestinian where their relatives are located.
Recommended publications
  • Iraqi Diaspora in Arizona: Identity and Homeland in Women’S Discourse
    Iraqi Diaspora in Arizona: Identity and Homeland in Women’s Discourse Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Hattab, Rose Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 20:53:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/634364 IRAQI DIASPORA IN ARIZONA: IDENTITY AND HOMELAND IN WOMEN’S DISCOURSE by Rose Hattab ____________________________ Copyright © Rose Hattab 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty oF the SCHOOL OF MIDDLE EASTERN AND NORTH AFRICAN STUDIES In Partial FulFillment oF the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 2 3 DEDICATION This thesis is gratefully dedicated to my grandmothers, the two strongest women I know: Rishqa Khalaf al-Taqi and Zahra Shibeeb al-Rubaye. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Hudson for her expertise, assistance, patience and thought-provoking questions. Without her help, this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to thank the members oF my thesis advisory committee, Dr. Julia Clancy-Smith and Dr. Anne Betteridge, For their guidance and motivation. They helped me turn this project From a series oF ideas and thoughts into a Finished product that I am dearly proud to call my own. My appreciation also extends to each and every Iraqi woman who opened up her heart, and home, to me.
    [Show full text]
  • COI Note on the Situation of Yazidi Idps in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq
    COI Note on the Situation of Yazidi IDPs in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq May 20191 Contents 1) Access to the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KR-I) ................................................................... 2 2) Humanitarian / Socio-Economic Situation in the KR-I ..................................................... 2 a) Shelter ........................................................................................................................................ 3 b) Employment .............................................................................................................................. 4 c) Education ................................................................................................................................... 6 d) Mental Health ............................................................................................................................ 8 e) Humanitarian Assistance ...................................................................................................... 10 3) Returns to Sinjar District........................................................................................................ 10 In August 2014, the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) seized the districts of Sinjar, Tel Afar and the Ninewa Plains, leading to a mass exodus of Yazidis, Christians and other religious communities from these areas. Soon, reports began to surface regarding war crimes and serious human rights violations perpetrated by ISIS and associated armed groups. These included the systematic
    [Show full text]
  • The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict
    The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya About MERI The Middle East Research Institute engages in policy issues contributing to the process of state building and democratisation in the Middle East. Through independent analysis and policy debates, our research aims to promote and develop good governance, human rights, rule of law and social and economic prosperity in the region. It was established in 2014 as an independent, not-for-profit organisation based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Middle East Research Institute 1186 Dream City Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq T: +964 (0)662649690 E: [email protected] www.meri-k.org NGO registration number. K843 © Middle East Research Institute, 2017 The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of MERI, the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publisher. The Yazidis Perceptions of Reconciliation and Conflict MERI Policy Paper Dave van Zoonen Khogir Wirya October 2017 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................4 2. “Reconciliation” after genocide .........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Rights in Iraq and Prospects for the Iraqi Turkmen Within Iraq Stefan Wolff [email protected] | | @Stefwolff
    Minority rights in Iraq and prospects for the Iraqi Turkmen within Iraq Stefan Wolff [email protected] | www.stefanwolff.com | @stefwolff Introduction Turkmen are the third-largest population group in Iraq with between 600,000 and 2 million members who have a strong sense of their distinct identity and have preserved their native language. They live concentrated in the north of Iraq in the Kurdistan Region and in the so-called disputed territories. The largest concentration of Turkmen live in the city and province of Kirkuk. Approximately 60% of Iraqi Turkmen are Sunni Muslims. Turkmens’ suffering under Saddam Hussein has been officially recognised in the Preamble of the Iraqi Constitution of 2005. Yet even in the new Iraq, Turkmen continue to be affected by ethnic and sectarian violence and discrimination. The legal framework of minority rights in Iraq The relevant legal framework for the rights of Turkmen (and other communities) in Iraq consists of applicable international standards, the Iraqi Constitution of 2005, and the Kurdistan Regional Constitution of 2009. So far, no comprehensive minority rights or anti-discrimination law has been passed, and provisions in existing legislation (such as the Criminal Code or the labour Code) allow for potential discrimination. Applicable international legal standards Iraq is a signatory to various relevant international documents, including (in chronological order): the ILO Convention 111 concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation (1958), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights (1966), and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965).
    [Show full text]
  • Assyrians.Pdf
    World Directory of Minorities Middle East MRG Directory –> Iraq –> Assyrians Print Page Close Window Assyrians Updated April 2008 Profile An estimated 225,000 Assyrians [US CIRF 2006] comprise a distinct ethno-religious group in Iraq, although official Iraqi statistics consider them to be Arabs. Descendants of ancient Mesopotamian peoples, Assyrians speak Aramaic and live mainly in the major cities and in the rural areas of north- eastern Iraq where they tend to be professionals and businessmen or independent farmers. They are Christians, belonging to one of four churches: the Chaldean (Uniate), Nestorian, Jacobite or Syrian Orthodox, and the Syrian Catholic. Assyrians form a distinct community, but with three origins: (1) those who inhabited Hakkari (in modern Turkey), who were predominantly tribal and whose leaders acknowledged the temporal as well as spiritual paramountcy of their patriarch, the Mar Shimun; (2) a peasant community in Urumiya (see Iran); and (3) a largely peasant community in Amadiya, Shaqlawa and Rawanduz in Iraqi Kurdistan. Historical context Because of its expulsion from the ‘Orthodox' community at Ephesus in 431, the Assyrian Church operated entirely east (hence its title) of Byzantine Christendom, establishing communities over a wide area. But its heartlands were at the apex of the fertile crescent. The Mongol invasions, however, virtually wiped out the Assyrian Church except in limited areas. On the whole the Assyrians co-existed successfully with the neighbouring Kurdish tribes. In Hakkari, Assyrian tribes held Kurdish as well as Assyrian peasantry in thrall, just as Kurdish tribes did, and rival Assyrian tribes would seek allies among neighbouring Kurdish tribes, and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army
    Intelligence and National Security Vol. 25, No. 1, 76–85, February 2010 US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army JAMES P. PFIFFNER ABSTRACT In May 2003 Paul Bremer issued CPA Orders to exclude from the new Iraq government members of the Baath Party (CPA Order 1) and to disband the Iraqi Army (CPA Order 2). These two orders severely undermined the capacity of the occupying forces to maintain security and continue the ordinary functioning of the Iraq government. The decisions reversed previous National Security Council judgments and were made over the objections of high ranking military and intelligence officers. The article concludes that the most likely decision maker was the Vice President. Early in the occupation of Iraq two key decisions were made that gravely jeopardized US chances for success in Iraq: (1) the decision to bar from government work Iraqis who ranked in the top four levels of Sadam’s Baath Party or who held positions in the top three levels of each ministry; (2) the decision to disband the Iraqi Army and replace it with a new army built from scratch. These two fateful decisions were made against the advice of military and CIA professionals and without consulting important members of the President’s staff and cabinet. This article will first examine the de- Baathification order and then take up the even more far reaching decision to disband the Iraqi Army. Both of these decisions fueled the insurgency by: (1) alienating hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who could not support themselves or their families; (2) by undermining the normal infrastructure necessary for social and economic activity; (3) by ensuring that there was not sufficient security to carry on normal life; and (4) by creating insurgents who were angry at the US, many of whom had weapons and were trained to use them.
    [Show full text]
  • From Baghdad to Bedford: Conceptualizing Diasporas and Aslak (Your Origins) Through the Framework of Iraqis in New Hampshire," Spectrum: Vol
    Recommended Citation Jarrar, Sarah (2019) "From Baghdad to Bedford: Conceptualizing Diasporas and Aslak (your origins) through the framework of Iraqis in New Hampshire," Spectrum: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholars.unh.edu/spectrum/vol8/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals and Publications at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Spectrum by an authorized editor of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spectrum Volume 8 Issue 1 From the Desk of Co-editors: Pr. Article 5 Peshkova and Pr. Michael 2019 From Baghdad to Bedford: Conceptualizing Diasporas and Aslak (your origins) through the framework of Iraqis in New Hampshire Sarah Jarrar Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/spectrum Jarrar: Conceptualizing Diasporas and Aslak (your origins) through the framework of Iraqis in NH From Baghdad to Bedford: Conceptualizing Diasporas and Aslak (your origins) through the framework of Iraqis in New Hampshire By Sarah Jarrar Introduction Abdullah is nineteen years old, and as he thinks about how to respond to the questions “what parts of your family’s tradition would you like to carry on as you grow older?” he motions his left hand forward and back over right shoulder. “There’s a word in Arabic…it’s Aslak. That’s something you can never get rid of.” Aslak in Arabic translate to English as “your origins”. When we are asked about our origins, how do we formulate our answers? Do we look to our parents, grandparents, even great grandparents for the answers? How and why do we adopt their country or city of origin if we do? With migrants, the answer to Aslak may seem to be a little clearer; they leave one geographic location to another and the differences of where they came from and where they are now made distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of the Sabean-Mandean Minority in Iraq
    COI QUERY Country of Origin Iraq Main subject Treatment of the Sabean-Mandean minority in Iraq Question(s) 1. General information 2. Rights (relevant legislation on identity documents, school enrolment, healthcare, education, residence, other rights) 3. Access and barriers to registering vital civil status events 4. Access to (re-obtaining lost) ID documents 5. Access to services: health, education, residence and other 6. Enrolment of children in school Date of completion 7 October 2020 Query Code Q 26 Contributing EU+ COI units This query response was sent to the EASO COI Specialist Network (if applicable) on Iraq1 for contributions on the treatment of members of the Sabean-Mandean community in Iraq. No information was contributed by EU+ countries, but feedback was received from the Swedish Migration Agency’s (SMA) Country of Origin expert institution (Lifos) and The Netherlands, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis (OCILA). Disclaimer This response to a COI query has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this response has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurds in Iraq Propose Controversial Referendum on Independence
    CRS INSIGHT Kurds in Iraq Propose Controversial Referendum on Independence September 21, 2017 (IN10758) | Related Author Christopher M. Blanchard | Christopher M. Blanchard, Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs ([email protected], 7-0428) The question of self-determination for the Kurds of Iraq and neighboring countries has remained unresolved since the delineation of national borders in the Middle East in the wake of World War I. U.S. intervention in Iraq since the 1990s has contributed to the emergence and protection of autonomous political institutions in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) and the development of the region's economy and security forces. At the same time, tensions between Kurds in Iraq and Iraq's national government have complicated U.S. efforts to assist Iraqis in securing and stabilizing their country. Successive U.S. Administrations have used diplomacy and military partnership initiatives to lower the risk of conflict between Kurds and other Iraqis, with mixed results. Recent U.S. partnerships with Kurds in Iraq in efforts to combat the Islamic State have further enmeshed the United States in the question of Kurdish security and relations between the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and Baghdad. Kurds and other Iraqis differ among themselves over the desirability and feasibility of Kurdish independence, and Iraq's neighbors warily monitor related developments and the aspirations of their own Kurdish citizens. On June 7, KRG President Masoud Barzani announced that the KRG would hold an official advisory referendum on independence from Iraq on September 25, 2017. The referendum question—"Do you want the Kurdistan region and the Kurdistani areas [disputed areas] outside the administration of Kurdistan region to become an independent state?"— would be posed to voters in the KRI and areas under the control of Kurdish forces.
    [Show full text]
  • “Native Christians Massacred”: the Ottoman Genocide of the Assyrians During World War I
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 1 Issue 3 Article 8 December 2006 “Native Christians Massacred”: The Ottoman Genocide of the Assyrians during World War I Hannibal Travis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Travis, Hannibal (2006) "“Native Christians Massacred”: The Ottoman Genocide of the Assyrians during World War I," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 3: Article 8. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol1/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘‘Native Christians Massacred’’: The Ottoman Genocide of the Assyrians during World War I Hannibal Travis Florida International University College of Law The Ottoman Empire’s widespread persecution of Assyrian civilians during World War I constituted a form of genocide, the present-day term for an attempt to destroy a national, ethnic, or religious group, in whole or in part. Ottoman soldiers and their Kurdish and Persian militia partners subjected hundreds of thousands of Assyrians to a deliberate and systematic campaign of massacre, torture, abduction, deportation, impoverishment, and cultural and ethnic destruction. Established principles of international law outlawed this war of extermination against Ottoman Christian civilians before it was embarked upon, and ample evidence of genocidal intent has surfaced in the form of admissions by Ottoman officials. Nevertheless, the international community has been hesitant to recognize the Assyrian experience as a form of genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • EPRS Briefing: Minorities in Iraq
    Briefing February 2015 Minorities in Iraq Pushed to the brink of existence SUMMARY Iraqi minorities (Turkmens, Yazidis, Christians and other smaller communities) have long been discriminated against in Iraq. Violence against them has increased dramatically in areas of Iraqi territory that have fallen under the control of the Islamist terrorist group that has declared itself 'the Islamic State' (known variously as IS, ISIS or ISIL, and by the Arabic acronym 'Daesh' or 'Da'esh'). After coming into power, this terrorist group called into question the very existence of several of these minorities, not least non-Muslim minorities, subjecting them to murder, rape, slavery and organ trafficking. Fearing for their life, people have been fleeing in unprecedented numbers: mass killings have led to the displacement of more than 2 million people, mainly to refugee camps in the Kurdistan region, these displacements are tangible evidence that the country is going through a process of reconfiguration and fragmentation. Past experience has shown that few displaced people ever return to their homes. In this briefing: Iraq's ethnic and religious diversity The situation before the ISIL/Da'esh attacks Humanitarian catastrophe in the wake of the ISIL/Da'esh onslaught EU response EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Eric Pichon; maps and graphs: Eulalia Claros Members' Research Service PE 548.988 EN EPRS Minorities in Iraq Iraq's ethnic and religious diversity Iraq's population is predominantly Muslim. Nearly two thirds are Shia and the other third is mainly Sunni.1 Compared to its neighbours, Iraq has a unique ethnic and religious diversity, mainly because tribal organisation still plays an important role in social life.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Christians in Baghdad
    Situation of Christians in Baghdad This document provides an overview of factual elements on the situation of Christians in Baghdad, Iraq, based on publicly available sources. The information is valid as at 15 January 2018. The Iraqi Constitution provides for freedom of thought, conscience, and religious belief and practice for all citizens,1 and stipulates that all Iraqis are equal before the law without discrimination based on, inter alia, ethnicity, religion, sect, or belief.2 The Iraqi Constitution also states that no law may be enacted that contradicts principles of democracy or the rights and basic freedoms stipulated in the Constitution.3 The Constitution further stipulates that the state shall guarantee the protection of places of worship.4 However, several constitutional and legal provisions compete with these guarantees.5 Furthermore, some legal provisions appear to restrict the freedom of religion, including by preventing the conversion of Muslims to other faiths and the automatic conversion of minor children to Islam if either parent converts to Islam,6 as well as prohibiting the practice of the Baha’i and Wahhabi faiths.7 Most of these contradictions have to date not been tested in court and, accordingly, the full scope of the protection of the freedom of religion remains unclear.8 Minority groups, including Christians, reportedly only enjoy limited political representation, including at the central, regional and governorate/local level.9 As a result of political marginalization and religion- 1 Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 15 October 2005, http://www.refworld.org/docid/454f50804.html, Articles 42, 43 (1A). 2 Ibid., Article 14.
    [Show full text]