DOCSLIB.ORG

Copy of Internal Homecounties 190924

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

YouGov - Home Counties Sample Size: 1905 GB Adults Fieldwork: 23rd - 24th September 2019 Gender Age Social Grade Region Region (Grouped) Rest of Midlands / East + SE + Traditional Home Total Male Female 18-24 25-49 50-64 65+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland East + SE South Wales London Counties Weighted Sample 1905 922 983 210 802 453 440 1086 819 229 636 411 465 164 668 439 249 Unweighted Sample 1905 819 1086 128 791 481 505 1124 781 194 684 407 452 168 671 477 265 % %%%%%%%%%%%%% % % % As far as you are aware, which of the following English counties, if any, make up the "Home Counties"? Bedfordshire IS one of the Home Counties 32 35 29 22 27 37 40 34 29 36 34 27 33 26 37 37 42 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 28 30 27 22 23 34 35 31 25 34 32 33 20 17 32 32 29 Don't know 40 35 44 56 49 29 25 35 45 30 34 40 47 56 31 31 30 Berkshire IS one of the Home Counties 50 51 48 24 42 61 64 53 45 50 54 53 46 33 53 55 56 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 13 15 10 17 11 12 14 14 11 19 15 10 9 9 17 15 15 Don't know 38 34 41 59 47 27 22 33 44 31 31 36 45 58 30 29 29 Buckinghamshire IS one of the Home Counties 55 57 54 33 48 65 68 59 50 54 61 57 51 42 58 61 61 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 9 11 7 14 7 101110 8 18 10 8 7 4 13 11 11 Don't know 36 32 39 53 45 25 21 31 42 29 29 34 42 54 28 28 28 Cambridgeshire IS one of the Home Counties 24 26 23 24 26 23 23 25 24 18 25 25 25 26 21 23 27 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 39 41 37 24 29 49 56 43 35 51 45 41 31 19 49 48 44 Don't know 36 33 40 52 46 28 21 33 41 31 30 33 44 54 30 29 29 Dorset IS one of the Home Counties 8 8 813964877 7 6 912 8 8 8 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 56 59 54 25 48 66 76 60 51 60 65 59 47 34 64 65 66 Don't know 36 33 39 61 43 28 20 32 42 32 28 35 44 54 29 27 26 East Sussex IS one of the Home Counties 29 32 26 28 27 32 30 32 25 28 33 30 24 26 32 34 34 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 32 33 31 19 25 38 45 35 29 42 35 30 31 16 38 36 38 Don't know 39 35 43 53 48 30 25 33 46 30 32 39 45 58 30 29 28 Essex IS one of the Home Counties 36 41 31 29 27 43 47 39 32 48 41 37 25 28 44 41 46 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 27 25 28 12 27 30 30 28 25 22 29 27 30 15 27 30 25 Don't know 37 34 40 59 45 27 23 33 43 29 30 36 45 57 29 29 29 Hampshire IS one of the Home Counties 28 29 27 26 28 33 24 29 27 32 27 28 29 24 30 30 32 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 34 37 32 18 25 39 54 38 29 36 42 37 27 19 39 41 38 Don't know 38 34 41 56 47 28 22 33 44 31 31 36 44 57 30 30 30 1 © 2019 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.co.uk YouGov - Home Counties Sample Size: 1905 GB Adults Fieldwork: 23rd - 24th September 2019 Gender Age Social Grade Region Region (Grouped) Rest of Midlands / East + SE + Traditional Home Total Male Female 18-24 25-49 50-64 65+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland East + SE South Wales London Counties Weighted Sample 1905 922 983 210 802 453 440 1086 819 229 636 411 465 164 668 439 249 Unweighted Sample 1905 819 1086 128 791 481 505 1124 781 194 684 407 452 168 671 477 265 % %%%%%%%%%%%%% % % % Hertfordshire IS one of the Home Counties 44 47 42 36 41 49 48 48 39 60 49 42 36 31 57 55 55 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 18 19 17 7 13 22 28 19 17 10 21 20 19 12 15 17 19 Don't know 38 34 41 57 46 28 23 33 44 29 30 38 44 57 28 28 27 Kent IS one of the Home Counties 42 45 38 30 34 50 52 45 37 45 48 40 36 33 47 48 54 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 21 21 21 8 21 24 24 21 20 20 21 24 22 12 22 23 20 Don't know 37 34 40 62 45 26 24 33 43 35 31 36 42 55 31 29 26 Lancashire IS one of the Home Counties 6 7 61576266105 6 7 7 7 6 6 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 60 64 56 23 51 70 83 64 54 55 66 63 58 40 63 66 67 Don't know 34 30 38 62 42 24 16 29 40 35 29 31 35 54 30 28 27 Lincolnshire IS one of the Home Counties 7 8 62076286156 5 6 7 9 7 8 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 58 61 55 24 49 69 80 62 52 55 65 62 54 38 62 65 66 Don't know 35 30 40 56 45 25 18 30 42 30 29 33 40 55 29 28 26 London IS one of the Home Counties 29 32 27 27 22 27 45 31 27 32 35 28 24 22 32 33 35 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 37 38 36 26 37 44 35 40 34 45 37 38 36 27 41 39 40 Don't know 34 30 37 47 40 28 20 29 39 23 29 33 40 51 26 28 25 Northampton IS one of the Home Counties 8 8 8149669 7 11 9 5 9 6 10 10 11 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 55 60 52 32 46 66 74 59 51 59 61 61 48 37 61 62 62 Don't know 37 32 41 55 46 28 20 32 43 30 30 35 43 57 29 28 26 Oxfordshire IS one of the Home Counties 27 30 25 32 27 26 27 29 25 27 30 25 27 26 29 30 31 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 36 37 35 15 27 46 53 38 33 43 39 40 30 20 41 40 39 Don't know 36 33 40 53 45 28 21 32 42 30 31 34 43 54 30 29 30 Surrey IS one of the Home Counties 52 56 49 38 45 59 66 57 46 64 61 47 44 39 63 63 66 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 12 13 12 9 11 14 14 12 12 9 12 16 13 5 10 11 10 Don't know 36 32 39 53 44 27 20 31 42 28 27 36 43 55 26 26 23 West Sussex IS one of the Home Counties 30 33 26 28 28 31 33 30 28 34 31 32 24 25 32 31 33 Is NOT one of the Home Counties 31 31 30 17 24 38 42 33 27 34 36 28 29 15 36 38 38 Don't know 40 36 44 55 49 32 25 36 45 32 33 40 47 60 31 31 29 2 © 2019 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.co.uk.
Recommended publications
  • Discover the City the City of London Visitor Destination Strategy (2019-2023)

    Discover the City the City of London Visitor Destination Strategy (2019-2023)

    M Discover the City The City Of London Visitor Destination Strategy (2019-2023) Draft Commissioned by: City of London Corporation Written by: Carmel Dennis and Richard Smith Edited by: Flagship Consulting RJS Associates Ltd E: [email protected] 1 Foreword “Our role in presenting the City, and indeed London, as an unparalleled world-class destination remains steadfast. We are blessed to be custodians of such an asset.” With over 2,000 years of experience in welcoming the world, the City has always been, and continues to be, one of the most historic, yet innovative destinations, welcoming business and leisure visitors from across the globe. Nationally, it leads all English local authorities for its use of heritage to foster a distinctive identity and enjoys the number one spot for engagement in culture, as identified in the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce’s (RSA) latest Heritage Index (2016), and in the Government-commissioned Active Lives Survey conducted by Ipsos MORI in 2017. This is the City of London Corporation’s fourth Visitor Strategy, its first was produced in 2007 and its most recent in 2013. Since that last strategy, huge progress has been made in delivering its vision – to significantly develop our visitor economy and, in so doing, enhance London’s attractiveness as place to visit and do business. In 2017, the City recorded increases against the strategy’s baselines of 19% in visits to its various attractions, 107% in visitors overall1, and 109% in visitor spend. Today, the sector is estimated to support over 18,000 jobs in the City.
  • Beyond the Compact City: a London Case Study – Spatial Impacts, Social Polarisation, Sustainable 1 Development and Social Justice

    Beyond the Compact City: a London Case Study – Spatial Impacts, Social Polarisation, Sustainable 1 Development and Social Justice

    University of Westminster Duncan Bowie January 2017 Reflections, Issue 19 BEYOND THE COMPACT CITY: A LONDON CASE STUDY – SPATIAL IMPACTS, SOCIAL POLARISATION, SUSTAINABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL JUSTICE Duncan Bowie Senior Lecturer, Department of Planning and Transport, University of Westminster [email protected] Abstract: Many urbanists argue that the compact city approach to development of megacities is preferable to urban growth based on spatial expansion at low densities, which is generally given the negative description of ‘urban sprawl’. The argument is often pursued on economic grounds, supported by theories of agglomeration economics, and on environmental grounds, based on assumptions as to efficient land use, countryside preservation and reductions in transport costs, congestion and emissions. Using London as a case study, this paper critiques the continuing focus on higher density and hyper-density residential development in the city, and argues that development options beyond its core should be given more consideration. It critiques the compact city assumptions incorporated in strategic planning in London from the first London Plan of 2004, and examines how the both the plan and its implementation have failed to deliver the housing needed by Londoners and has led to the displacement of lower income households and an increase in spatial social polarisation. It reviews the alternative development options and argues that the social implications of alternative forms of growth and the role of planning in delivering spatial social justice need to be given much fuller consideration, in both planning policy and the delivery of development, if growth is to be sustainable in social terms and further spatial polarisation is to be avoided.
  • Disambiguating Language Attitudes Held Towards Sociodemographic Groups and Geographic Areas in South East England

    Disambiguating Language Attitudes Held Towards Sociodemographic Groups and Geographic Areas in South East England

    Disambiguating language attitudes held towards sociodemographic groups and geographic areas in South East England Amanda Cole [email protected] Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester, U.K. This paper has been accepted for publication and will appear in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in Journal of Linguistic Geography published by Cambridge University Press. Copyright Cambridge University Press. 1 ABSTRACT Using a novel, digitized method, this paper investigates the language attitudes of 18- to 33-year-olds in South East England. More broadly, this paper demonstrates that disambiguating the language attitudes held towards sociodemographic groups and geographic areas is paramount to understanding the configuration of language attitudes in an area, particularly, for areas with high cultural and linguistic heterogeneity. A total of 194 respondents evaluated the speech of 102 south-eastern speakers. Results reveal an imperfect mapping between language attitudes held towards geographic areas and speakers from these areas. Although East London and Essex are the most negatively evaluated areas, speakers’ demographic and identity data is the primary factor conditioning language attitudes. Across South East England, working-class and/or BAME (Black, Asian and minority ethnic) speakers, as well as those who identify their accent in geographically marked terms are evaluated most negatively, which is compounded if they are from East London or Essex. Keywords: language attitudes; accents in South East England; solidarity and social status; perceptual dialectology; standard language ideology 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Analysing Language Attitudes in their Social and Geographic Context In language attitude and perceptual dialectology work, linguists are often presented with the consideration of how to disambiguate language attitudes held towards geographic areas and sociodemographic groups.
  • Super Prime Home Counties Lettings Winter | 2016/17

    Super Prime Home Counties Lettings Winter | 2016/17

    SUPER PRIME HOME COUNTIES LETTINGS WINTER | 2016/17 Changes to taxation and greater flexibility from landlords means activity in the super prime rental market across the Home Counties is buoyant, as Jemma Scott tells Oliver Knight One beneficiary of recent changes to For landlords, yields in the region of 3% stamp duty has been the luxury lettings to 4% are attainable for the best-in-class Wentworth, Virginia Water: £22,500 PCM sector. Both supply and demand have risen super prime properties. as higher purchase costs at the top-end of The super prime lettings market in the the sales market make buyers increasingly Home Counties is concentrated on a price sensitive. relatively small number of areas primarily Knight Frank analysis of the super prime in Ascot, Virginia Water, Cobham and Esher, (£15,000-plus/month) market across as figure 1 shows. the Home Counties shows that the There is a strong correlation between number or properties available for rent the market and proximity to international has increased by 56% so far in 2016 schools such as ACS Egham, ACS Cobham compared to last year. Hurst, Berkshire: £25,000 PCM and TASIS, the American school, with The number of viewings conducted above education a big driver at the top end of Super Prime Lettings Team this level by Knight Frank offices has also the market. ‘Try-before-you-buy’ tenants The Knight Frank Super Prime lettings team more than doubled year-on-year, while the who want to get to know an area before provides a unique service to clients and tenants number of tenancies agreed in 2016 committing to a purchase are another key with property interests upwards of £15,000 per is comfortably higher than in both 2015 source of demand.
  • The Making of the Modern Metropolis: Evidence from London

    The Making of the Modern Metropolis: Evidence from London

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE MAKING OF THE MODERN METROPOLIS: EVIDENCE FROM LONDON Stephan Heblich Stephen J. Redding Daniel M. Sturm Working Paper 25047 http://www.nber.org/papers/w25047 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2018 We are grateful to Bristol University, the London School of Economics, and Princeton University for research support. Heblich also acknowledges support from the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) Grant No. INO15-00025. We would like to thank Victor Couture, Jonathan Dingel, Ed Glaeser, Vernon Henderson, Petra Moser, Leah Platt-Boustan, Will Strange, Claudia Steinwender, Jerry White, Christian Wolmar and conference and seminar participants at Berkeley, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Dartmouth, EIEF Rome, German Economic Association, Harvard, MIT, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), University College London (UCL), Urban Economics Association (UEA), Vienna, Yale, Zoom Urban Seminar, and Zurich for helpful comments. We would like to thank David Green for sharing printed copies of the Henry Poole data and T. Wangyal Shawa for his help with the GIS data. We would also like to thank the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, the British Library (BL), the British Library of Political and Economic Science (BLPES) at the London School of Economics, the Guildhall Library, London Metropolitan Archives (LMA), and the Omnibus Society for their help with data. Finally, we are grateful to Charoo Anand, Iain Bamford, Horst Braeunlich, Dennis Egger, Andreas Ferrara, Ben Glaeser and Florian Trouvain for excellent research assistance. The usual disclaimer applies.
  • Housing in the South East

    Housing in the South East

    House of Commons South East Regional Committee Housing in the South East First Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 30 March 2010 HC 403 Published on 7 April 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The South East Regional Committee The South East Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine regional strategies and the work of regional bodies. Current membership Dr Stephen Ladyman MP (Labour, South Thanet) (Chairman) Ms Celia Barlow MP (Labour, Hove) David Lepper MP (Labour, Brighton, Pavilion) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Mr Andrew Smith MP (Labour, Oxford East) Powers The committee is one of the Regional Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/se.cfm. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Sîan Woodward (Clerk), Duma Langton (Inquiry Manager), Leena Mathew (NAO Adviser), Emma Sawyer (Senior Committee Assistant), Ian Blair (Committee Assistant), and Anna Browning (Committee Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the South East Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank,
  • CALA Homes (South Home Counties) Ltd Tilford House CALA M1 A1(M) N��TH H�ME Farnham Business Park C�UNT�ES Weydon Lane �EG��N Farnham M25 GU9 8QT Tel: 01252 736750

    CALA Homes (South Home Counties) Ltd Tilford House CALA M1 A1(M) NTH HME Farnham Business Park CUNTES Weydon Lane EGN Farnham M25 GU9 8QT Tel: 01252 736750

    CALA Homes (South Home Counties) Ltd Tilford House CALA M1 A1(M) NORTH HOME Farnham Business Park COUNTIES Weydon Lane REGION Farnham M25 GU9 8QT Tel: 01252 736750 M40 CALA Nick Brown CHILTERN Land Director REGION Email: [email protected] DD: 01252 736762 Mobile: 07554 436493 SOUTHWARK Woolwich GREENWICH Erith M4 LAMBETH BEXLEY Tom Stancombe Blackheath Crayford LEWISHAM Senior Land Manager M25 Email: [email protected] MERTON Beckenham Morden Penge DD: 01252 736761 Walton-On-Thames Esher SUTTON CROYDON BROMLEY Carshalton M20 Mobile: 07823 341574 Weybridge M2 CALA HOMES (SOUTH M25 HOME COUNTIES) LTD Elmbridge Epsom Purley District Banstead Biggin Hill Kemsing Andrew Dossett Coulsden M26 Hook Reigate & Warlingham Rushmoor KENT Land Manager Leatherhead Banstead E & W Malling District Caterham Maidstone COUNTY Email: [email protected] Fleet District Sevenoaks Hart Farnborough Kings Hill DD: 01252 736763 Redhill M25 District Dorking Maidstone Guildford Reigate Tandridge Sevenoaks Hadlow Mobile: 07717 874471 Odiham District District Tonbridge District Guildford District SURREY M23 COUNTY Edenbridge Paddock Wood Lingfield Staplehurst Jamie Chalmers Mole Valley Horley Farnham Godalming Royal Marden Land Manager District Tunbridge Wells Alton Email: [email protected] Waverley District Tunbridge Wells Cranleigh District DD: 01252 736793 Crawley Haslemere Forest Row A21 Cranbrook M: 07773 212725 East Hampshire District Mid Sussex Horsham District Crowborough Liphook EAST Georgie Elliott Horsham SUSSEX Wealden Land Buyer District Haywards
  • Contact Elmbridge Liberal Democrats

    Contact Elmbridge Liberal Democrats

    AUTUMN 2020 GE2019 Esher & Walton 49% 45% CON LIB Local news & action from Elmbridge Lib Dems DEM 5% LAB It’s now so close between the Lib Dems Elmbridge delivers for local residents and the Tories across Elmbridge The coronavirus outbreak has been a struggle for many businesses, organisations, and people in our community. As of August, Elmbridge Borough Council has been able to provide THANK YOU To all volunteers, council, NHS and service staff for everything you’ve done 26,560 1,780 5,002 £10,000 meals on wheels business grants calls to donated to for our community equating to £24.6M shielded residents food banks Ed Davey 18,876 4,500 31,975 MP for Surbiton welfare calls to customer interactions coronavirus and Kingston vulnerable residents per week webpage visits becomes new Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey has been elected as the new leader of the Liberal Democrats. As Government U-turn the MP for Kingston and Surbiton, Ed already knows Elmbridge very well. leaves Surrey Tory Having increased his majority in the leader embarassed 2019 election over the Conservatives, Ed is perfectly placed to know the over waste of challenges and opportunities we face taxpayers’ money to get a Liberal Democrat candidate elected at the next election. Cllr Mary Marshall gives a Tory County Council Leader Tim Oliver, thumbs up to Cllr Tricia Bland Having been first elected to parliament Weybridge Division, has been forced to in 1997, Ed brings a wealth of delay contraversial plans for a single Environmentally experience with him and recently forced Unitary Authority in Surrey to replace Boris Johnson into committing to hold the existing 11 districts and boroughs friendly a public inquiry into the Coronavirus by next May.
  • A Guide to the Historic Counties for the Press and Media

    A Guide to the Historic Counties for the Press and Media

    Our counties matter! A guide to the historic counties for the Press and Media Be County-Wise and get to know the Historic Counties county-wise.org.uk First Edition Visit county-wise.org.uk for more information about the Historic Counties 1 Be County-Wise and get to know the Historic Counties abcounties.com/press-and-media [email protected] Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 About the Association of British Counties ....................................................................... 2 About County-Wise .............................................................................................................. 2 Top ten county facts ........................................................................................................... 6 Quick county quotes .......................................................................................................... 9 Where to find a county – quickly and easily ................................................................... 10 Frequently asked questions about the counties ............................................................... 11 First published in the United Kingdom in 2014 by the Association of British Counties. Copyright © The Association of British Counties 2014 County-Wise county-wise.org.uk A guide to the historic counties for the Press and Media 2 Introduction The identity of the historic counties has become confused by the use of the term
  • 62 - the Directories of London and the Home Counties

    62 - the Directories of London and the Home Counties

    RESEARCH GUIDE 62 - The Directories of London and the Home Counties CONTENTS The uses of directories Points to remember when using the directories Guide to the directories of London and the Home Counties held in LMA Bibliography The uses of directories London Metropolitan Archives (LMA)&#39 extensive collection includes volumes of trade, street, court and local directories, the earliest dating from 1677. These directories have been perceived as transient, ephemeral publications, to be discarded after subsequent editions were produced. Yet, taken as a set, they are of considerable value as a source of evidence of the social, commercial and topographical development of the metropolis. Examples of use include: As a genealogical source that can be useful in tracing occupancy and trades of individuals. As a source for the history of businesses and institutions. To establish links between street naming and the occupations of the streets' inhabitants, e.g. Milk Street was named after the milk sellers who traditionally traded in that street. To investigate the municipal development of London. The early directories chart the year by year development of street numbering and naming that followed the Court of Common Council's 1765 Bill, introducing street numbering to the City of London. Points to remember when using the directories It is important to remember, when consulting directories, that they are not an official source of information but were produced commercially by independent publishers. Hence, especially before the later half of the nineteenth century, format and coverage of the directories are not consistent. Frederick Kelly's Post Office London Directory dominated the market from the mid nineteenth century but before this time other publishers, such as Holden, Johnstone and Underhill produced more comprehensive volumes.
  • Royal Jews: Jewish Life in Berkshire from the Readmission Till Today

    Royal Jews: Jewish Life in Berkshire from the Readmission Till Today

    10.14324/111.444.jhs.2016v47.014 Royal Jews: Jewish Life in Berkshire from the Readmission till Today jonathan romain In a previous article for Transactions,1 I covered the remarkable history of the medieval river Jews – those who arrived after the Norman Conquest, settled in London and then gradually moved out along the River Thames to places where Jews today go for Sunday picnics (to Windsor, Marlow, Henley), which were certainly not high-density Jewish areas in the Middle Ages, but where there was a Jewish presence. That came to an end following the expulsion of the Jews in 1290 and lasted until their readmission by Cromwell in 1656. In reality there were a few exceptions by those who made brief appearances in the area under examination, Berkshire (but occasionally straying across its borders to South Buckinghamshire and parts of Oxfordshire). One such individual was found in 1450 living near Eton College, which had been established ten years earlier by Henry VI. Once discovered, the only way he could remain in the country was to be baptized. This occurred under the auspices of the king and so he took the name Henry of Eton, presumably a way of reflecting both his loyalty to the monarch and his place of residence at the time. He went to live in the Domus Conversorum in London, but left after three years, after which his whereabouts are unknown.2 A much longer resident was a Jew who converted and took the name Henry of Windsor, who stayed there from 1488 until his death in 1509.3 Everything changed after Cromwell: Jews emerged in London and later migrated to the Home Counties, the area west of London covering Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, and Oxfordshire.
  • South East of England Wildfire Group

    South East of England Wildfire Group

    Building our Resilience to Wildfires Preparation and Prevention for 2012 South East of England Regional Wildfire Group & Home Counties Operational Wildfire Group Rural Development Initiatives Ltd. SEEWG/HCWG Project Plan April 2010 Building our Resilience to Wildfires Preparation and Prevention for 2012 Project Plan April 2010 Prepared by Rural Development Initiatives on behalf of the South East England Regional Wildfire Group and Home Counties Operational Wildfire Group Partnerships Rural Development Initiatives Ltd. Crichiebank Business Centre Port Elphinstone Inverurie Aberdeenshire AB51 5NQ www.ruraldevelopment.org.uk Any queries in connection with this plan should be addressed to: Martin Glynn Director Rural Development Initiatives Ltd T: 01765 650 149 M: 07711 710 808 E: [email protected] Rural Development Initiatives Ltd. SEEWG/HCWG Project Plan April 2010 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 Aims and Objectives .................................................................................................................... 5 3 Impacts of Wildfire ...................................................................................................................... 7 4 Why is this Project Needed? ....................................................................................................