The Ecumenical Patriarchate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ecumenical Patriarchate Romania and, for a time, even Greece. Since the THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE fall of Communism in Eastern Europe, the Ecu- menical Patriarchate has supported the restora- The Ecumenical tion of Orthodox Churches that had been sup- For more information and resources visit: pressed, for example, the Orthodox Church of Albania. The official website of The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Patriarchate Constantinople: www.ec-patr.org Additonal articles on the website of the Greek Ortho- dox Archdiocese: www.goarch.org/ourfaith Website for the 2009 Patriarchal Visit to the United States: www.usvisit2009.org The Patriarchal Cathedral of Saint George at the Phanar Website for the Religion, Science, and Environment Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew has visited Symposium Restoring the Balance: The Great Missis- Muslim nations, previously never visited by Christian sippi River: www.rsesymposia.org heads of Churches, advocating religious tolerance, Copyright 2009. All rights reserved. freedom, and peace among all religions. Moreover, Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America his pioneering initiatives for the preservation of THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE TODAY the natural environment have earned him the title “Green Patriarch.” He organized five environmental The Ecumenical Patriarchate is actively en- seminars in co-sponsorship with His Royal Highness gaged in diverse ecclesiastical activities and Prince Philip (1994-1998). He also established the Reli- ministries. On a day-to-day basis, it oversees the gious and Scientific Committee, which has organized Faith and Life is a new pamphlet series that pastoral life of the Orthodox community in Tur- seven international, interfaith and interdisciplinary provides an introduction to a wide range of spiritual key and those communities under its jurisdiction seaborne symposia to date: Patmos and the Mediter- and theological issues. Drawing from the beauty globally. It also maintains communication with ranean (1995), the Black Sea (1997), the Danube River and wisdom of Orthodox Christianity, the series the leadership of the autocephalous Orthodox (1999), the Adriatic Sea (2002), the Baltic Sea (2003), addresses the challenges of contemporary life and Churches. For example, since the 1960’s the Ecu- the Amazon River (2006), and the Mississippi River offers guidance to help you grow in your relationship menical Patriarchate has chaired a series of pan- and Gulf Coast (2009). with God and in your commitment to His will for Orthodox meetings to address contemporary your life. The series is a collaborative effort of the challenges facing all Orthodox Churches. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese Departments of Church The Ecumenical Patriarchate is a dynamic and Society, Communications, Internet Ministries, leader in ecumenical dialogue and the reconcili- Outreach and Evangelism, Religious Education, and ation of Christians. Since the 1960’s, it has been Youth and Young Adult Ministries. in dialogue with the Oriental Orthodox Churches (Armenian, Coptic, Ethiopian, etc.), working to For additional resources, visit... heal the divisions of the oldest Christian division, FAITH.GOARCH.ORG which dates from 451. The Ecumenical Patriarch- ate has fully participated in the work of the World Council of Churches from its inception, as well as in local ecumenical bodies instituting and chair- ing bilateral theological dialogues with non-Or- 8 East 79th Street, New York, NY 10075 thodox Christians and also with other monothe- His All Holiness Bartholomew istic faiths. Archbishop of Constantinople and Ecumenical Patriarch Tel: (212) 570-3500 • Fax: (212) 570-3569 FAITH.GOARCH.ORG 5 6 E-mail:[email protected] • Web: www.goarch.org THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE Greece, Poland, Albania, and the Church of the Czech of Rome. The 28th canon of the Fourth Ecumenical The Ecumenical Lands and Slovakia. The Autonomous Churches in- Council held in Chalcedon (451) granted Constantino- Patriarchate clude those of Finland and of Estonia. Consequently, ple equal ranking to Rome and special responsibilities the Orthodox Churches in Europe, North and South throughout the rest of the world and expanded its ju- he Ecumenical Patriarchate of America, Australia, Asia, and Britain, which are not risdiction to territories hitherto unclaimed. The Great TConstantinople (present-day Istanbul, under the jurisdiction of the aforementioned auto- Schism of 1054—in fact the culmination of a gradual Turkey) is the highest See and holiest center cephalous Churches, are within the jurisdiction of the estrangement over many centuries—resulted in for- of the Orthodox Christian Church. Its history Ecumenical Patriarchate. It is a true sense of unity in mal separation between the Churches of the East and diversity. the West, leaving Constantinople first in honor and Synaxis of the Heads of the Orthodox Churches at the spans seventeen centuries, from the earliest Phanar in October 2008 days of Christianity, through the Byzantine and jurisdiction in the Orthodox world. Ottoman Empires, down to our present day. The As a title, the phrase “Ecumenical Patriarch” dates The Ecumenical Patriarchate also sponsored Ecumenical Patriarchate constitutes the center of from the sixth century and belongs exclusively to the missionary growth through the centuries, the all the local Orthodox Churches, heading these Archbishop of Constantinople. The Ecumenical Patri- most notable of which was the conversion of the not by administration but by virtue of its primacy archate holds an honorary primacy among the auto- Kievan Rus in the tenth century and the most re- in the ministry of Orthodox Christian unity and cephalous, or ecclesiastically independent, Church- cent of which was the missionary work in South- the coordination of the activity of the whole of es. It enjoys the privilege of serving as “first among east Asia in the last century. This pastoral role and the Orthodox Church. equals.” It is also known as the “Roman” Patriarchate responsibility has earned the characterization of the Ecumenical Patriarchate as “the golden bea- The function of the Ecumenical Patriarchate (hence the Turkish phrase: Rum Patrikhanesi), recall- ing its historical source as the Church of New Rome. con of Orthodoxy, preserving the unwaning bril- as center par excellence of the entire Orthodox liance of Christianity.” world emanates from its centuries-old ministry When Constantinople became the capital of the in the witness, protection, and outreach of the Ottoman Empire in 1453, the Ecumenical Patriarch (at The Ecumenical Patriarchate is the voice for Orthodox Christian faith. The Ecumenical Pa- The Church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople was the Cathedral the time, Gennadius II) was recognized as Ethnarch of the long-suffering Orthodox Christian Church, triarchate therefore possesses a trans-national of the Ecumenical Patriarchate for over one thousand years. the Orthodox peoples, with increased religious and which has survived some of the most severe and supra-regional character. From this lofty civil authority over the Eastern Patriarchates and the religious persecutions the world has witnessed consciousness and responsibility for the people HISTORY Balkan Churches, as well as farther afield. during the last century. Beginning with the twen- of Christ, regardless of race and language, were tieth century’s first decades, entire Orthodox born the new regional Churches of the East, from The Church of Constantinople is traditionally re- From that time, the Ecumenical Patriarchate be- Christian populations throughout Southeast- the Caspian to the Baltic, and from the Balkans to garded as being founded by St. Andrew, the “first- came a symbol of unity, rendering service and soli- ern Europe, Asia Minor, and Crete were extin- Central Europe. This activity today extends to the called” of the Apostles, who preached in the city of darity to the Eastern Churches. The Ecumenical Patri- guished. In addition, World War II brought the Far East, the Americas, and Australia. Byzantium in the first century of Christianity. Follow- archate was consulted for the resolution of disputes genocide of 700,000 Serbian Orthodox by the ing the establishment of Constantinople (built on the between the Churches. Frequently, patriarchs of oth- Nazis and their surrogates. Thousands of Ortho- Orthodox Christians on all continents, which site of Byzantium) as the new capital of the Roman er Churches would reside in Constantinople, which dox Christians wearing blue armbands marked do not fall under the jurisdiction of the auto- Empire in AD 330, a series of ecclesiastical events el- was the venue for meetings of the Holy Synod that with a “P” (for “Pravoslavni” or “Orthodox”) were cephalous (independent) or autonomous (semi- evated the status of the Bishop of New Rome (as Con- was chaired by the Ecumenical Patriarch. With the marched to death camps side by side with their independent) Orthodox Churches, fall under the stantinople was also called) to its current position and rise of nation-states in the Balkans and the collapse of Jewish neighbors. From the days of the Bolshe- jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The privilege. The 3rd canon of the Second Ecumenical the Ottoman Empire in the late nineteenth and early vik revolution and after World War II, the Iron autocephalous Churches are the ancient Patri- Council held in Constantinople (381) conferred upon twentieth centuries, the Patriarchate has overseen Curtain descended upon the Orthodox Church, archates of Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem the bishop of this city second rank after the Bishop the development of the Orthodox Churches in those which continued to be the target of a systematic (together with the Archdiocese of Mt. Sinai), the lands. campaign of repression, destruction and death Patriarchates of Russia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, that encompassed Russia, Albania, Bulgaria, and Georgia, as well as the Churches of Cyprus, 1 2 3 4.
Recommended publications
  • The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople1
    STEFANOS ATHANASIOU The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople1 A Religious Minority and a Global Player Introduction In the extended family of the Orthodox Church of the Byzantine rite, it is well known that the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople takes honorary prece- dence over all other Orthodox autocephalous and autonomous churches.2 The story of its origins is well known. From a small church on the bay of the Bos- porus in the fishing village of Byzantium, to the centre of Eastern Christianity then through the transfer of the Roman imperial capital from Rome to Constantinople in the fourth century, and later its struggle for survival in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey. Nevertheless, a discussion of the development of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople is required to address the newly- kindled discussion between the 14 official Orthodox autocephalous churches on the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in today’s Orthodox world. A recalling of apposite historical events is relevant to this discussion. As Karl Löwith remarks, “[H]istorical consciousness can only begin with itself, although its intention is to visualise the thinking of other times and other people. History must continually be recalled, reconsidered and re-explored by each current living generation” (Löwith 2004: 12). This article should also be understood with this in mind. It is intended to awaken old memories for reconsideration and reinterpretation. Since the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has taken up the role of custodian of the Byzantine tradition and culture and has lived out this tradition in its liturgical life in the region of old Byzantium (Eastern Roman Empire) and then of the Ottoman Empire and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Assumption Greek Orthodox Church 430 Sheep Pasture Road Port Jefferson, New York 11777
    ASSUMPTION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH 430 SHEEP PASTURE ROAD PORT JEFFERSON, NEW YORK 11777 631-473-0894 430 SHEEP PASTURE ROAD PORT JEFFERSON, NEW YORK 11777 THE WORD "ICON" AS IT OCCURS IN THE SCRIPTURES CALL OUR OFFICE FOR DONATION TO SPONSOR THIS ICON Iconography (from Greek: εικoνογραφία) refers to the making and liturgical Saint John the Evangelist (Άγιος Ιωάννης ο Εύαγγελιστής) use of icons, pictorial representations of Biblical scenes from the life of Jesus Christ, historical events in the life of the Church, and portraits of the saints. Images have always been a vital part of the Church, but their place was the subject of the Iconoclast Controversy in the 8th and 9th centuries, especially in the East. The icons found in Orthodox Churches are a celebration of the fact that Jesus Christ is indeed the Word of God made flesh and that anyone who has seen Jesus has seen the Father (John 12:45 and 14:8-12). As the 7th Ecumenical Council held in the city of Nicea in 787 AD proclaimed, icons are in color what the Scriptures are in words: witnesses to the incarnation, the fact that God has come among us as a person whom we can see, touch and hear. In fact, in the traditional language of the Church, icons are not painted but written and an iconographer is literally "one who writes icons." "Written" or "Painted"? The most literal translation of the Greek word εικονογραφία (eikonographia) is "image writing," leading many English-speaking Orthodox Christians to insist that icons are not "painted" but rather "written." From there, further explanations are given that icons are to be understood in a manner similar to Holy Scripture—that is, they are not simply artistic compositions but rather are witnesses to the truth the way Scripture is.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great and Holy Synod and Why It Is Important for Orthodoxy
    The Great and Holy Synod And Why It is Important for Orthodoxy Background Information—The Ecumenical Councils In the year 325, the Emperor Constantine convened the First Ecumenical Council in Nicea. Why? To put order where there was chaos. In the first three centuries of Christianity, the church was underground and persecuted. When Christianity became the legal religion of the Roman Empire in the early 4th century, as the churches of the various cities began communicating openly, there was disagreement, even scandal and heresy, because there was not agreement on basic tenets of the faith. The First Ecumenical Council gathered all the bishops of all the churches together, and after deliberation and prayer, the result of this Council was the Nicene Creed (our confession of faith) and the Canon of Scripture. Between 325 and 787, seven such Councils were held, which have given us the backbone of our Orthodox theology and praxis. For a Council to be truly “Ecumenical”, it means that all the churches are involved. Following the Great Schism in 1054, and now the further fracturing of Christianity into thousands of denominations, it is not possible to have a Council that is truly “Ecumenical.” The Autocephalous Churches In the Ancient Church, there were five “Patriarchates”—Rome, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria. It is not the Orthodox “tradition” to have one “pope” who speaks infallibly for the whole church. Rather, our system of governance is “collegial” or “synodical.” There were, in the beginning, five autocephalous, or self- governing churches, each being led by a “Patriarch.” The Patriarch of Constantinople is recognized as the “Ecumenical Patriarch.” While he does not have administrative authority over the “Autocephalous” Churches, when all the churches gather together, he sits as the “first among equals.” The Seven Ecumenical Councils, or Synods, were convened under the “synodical” system that was the “tradition” among the ancient Patriarchates.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Liturgical Hymnography: a Stumbling Stone for the Jewish-Orthodox Christian Dialogue? Alexandru Ioniță*
    Byzantine Liturgical Hymnography: a Stumbling Stone for the Jewish-Orthodox Christian Dialogue? Alexandru Ioniță* This article discusses the role of Byzantine liturgical hymnography within the Jewish- Orthodox Christian dialogue. It seems that problematic anti-Jewish hymns of the Orthodox liturgy were often put forward by the Jewish side, but Orthodox theologians couldn’t offer a satisfactory answer, so that the dialogue itself profoundly suffered. The author of this study argues that liturgical hymnography cannot be a stumbling stone for the dialogue. Bringing new witnesses from several Orthodox theologians, the author underlines the need for a change of perspective. Then, beyond the intrinsic plea for the revision of the anti-Jewish texts, this article actually emphasizes the need to rediscover the Jewishness of the Byzantine liturgy and to approach the hymnography as an exegesis or even Midrash on the biblical texts and motives. As such, the anti-Jewish elements of the liturgy can be considered an impulse to a deeper analysis of Byzantine hymnography, which could be very fruitful for the Jewish-Christian Dialogue. Keywords: Jewish-Orthodox Christian Dialogue; Byzantine Hymnography; anti-Judaism; Orthodox Liturgy. Introduction The dialogue between Christian Orthodox theologians and Jewish repre- sentatives is by far one of the least documented and studied inter-religious interchanges. However, in recent years several general approaches to this topic have been issued1 and a complex study of it by Pier Giorgio Tane- burgo has even been published.2 Yet, because not all the reports presented at different Christian-Jewish joint meetings have been published and also, * Alexandru Ioniță, research fellow at the Institute for Ecumenical Research, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu.
    [Show full text]
  • Canon Law of Eastern Churches
    KB- KBZ Religious Legal Systems KBR-KBX Law of Christian Denominations KBR History of Canon Law KBS Canon Law of Eastern Churches Class here works on Eastern canon law in general, and further, on the law governing the Orthodox Eastern Church, the East Syrian Churches, and the pre- Chalcedonean Churches For canon law of Eastern Rite Churches in Communion with the Holy See of Rome, see KBT Bibliography Including international and national bibliography 3 General bibliography 7 Personal bibliography. Writers on canon law. Canonists (Collective or individual) Periodicals, see KB46-67 (Christian legal periodicals) For periodicals (Collective and general), see BX100 For periodicals of a particular church, see that church in BX, e.g. BX120, Armenian Church For periodicals of the local government of a church, see that church in KBS Annuals. Yearbooks, see BX100 Official gazettes, see the particular church in KBS Official acts. Documents For acts and documents of a particular church, see that church in KBS, e.g. KBS465, Russian Orthodox Church Collections. Compilations. Selections For sources before 1054 (Great Schism), see KBR195+ For sources from ca.1054 on, see KBS270-300 For canonical collections of early councils and synods, both ecumenical/general and provincial, see KBR205+ For document collections of episcopal councils/synods and diocesan councils and synods (Collected and individual), see the church in KBS 30.5 Indexes. Registers. Digests 31 General and comprehensive) Including councils and synods 42 Decisions of ecclesiastical tribunals and courts (Collective) Including related materials For decisions of ecclesiastical tribunals and courts of a particular church, see that church in KBS Encyclopedias.
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Guidelines: Orthodox Christian Leaders
    Tip Sheets: Engaging Faith Communities V1.2 Engagement Guidelines: Orthodox Christian Leaders Religion Called: Orthodox Christianity Adherents Consider Themselves: Christian and are called Orthodox Christians House of Worship: Church or Cathedral First Point of Contact: Senior parish priest a.k.a. pastor Religious Leader: Priest or Deacon Spoken Direct Address: Use “Father” Physical Interaction: Handshake O.K. across sexes HOUSE OF WORSHIP Churches are local houses of worship. A parish refers to the congregation of a particular church. Parishes often have non-sacred spaces such as multipurpose rooms, schools, gyms, or offices. Cathedrals are large centers of worship for an entire regional area run by a Diocese or Archdiocese. Monasteries and convents house monks and nuns (respectively), and may include a chapel and areas for instruction/work. RELIGIOUS LEADERS Ordained/Commissioned/Licensed Leaders Orthodox Christian leadership is hierarchical with each national/ethnic branch having its own structure and leadership. Regional leadership generally falls to bishops (or archbishops, catholicos, or metropolitans). Priests and deacons provide sacramental and spiritual leadership; priests often are in charge of a local parish. Both priests and deacons are permitted to marry. Holy Orders and Lay Leaders Monks and nuns are non-ordained (lay) leaders (except for hiermonks who are ordained priests or deacons) who have usually taken a vow of poverty, celibacy, and obedience and often live an active vocation of both prayer and service. Many monks, nuns, and laypersons have important leadership positions —avoid assumptions based on title. Some U.S. parishes have lay administrators who take on many of the roles once the exclusive domain of clergy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fener Greek Patriarchate
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS March - May 1998 Volume III - Number 1 THE FENER GREEK PATRIARCHATE A. SUAT BİLGE Dr. A. Suat Bilge is Professor of International Relations and Ambassador (retired). A controversy concerning the Fener Greek Patriarchate started in Turkey in 1997. It was stated that the Patriarchate could be used both for and against the interests of Turkey. On the one hand, it was claimed that the Patriarchate had intentions to establish itself as an ecumenical church and become a state like the Vatican; that the Orthodox world was trying to gain power in Turkey. On the other hand, some people stated that Turkey could benefit from the prestigious position of the Patriarchate and suggested an improvement in its status. First of all, I want to stress that the Patriarchate no longer enjoys the importance it once possessed in Greek-Turkish relations. Today, the Patriarchate is trying to become influential in Turkish-American relations. The Fener Greek Patriarchate is a historical religious institution. After the division of the Roman Empire, it became the church of the Byzantine Empire and obtained the status of an ecumenical church. With the collapse of the Byzantine Empire, the Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Ottoman Empire. Besides its functions as a religious institution, the Patriarchate was also granted the right to act as a ministry of Greek affairs by Mehmet II. He granted increased authority and privileges to the Patriarch. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Fener Greek Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Republic of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Rhetoric of St. John Chrysostom with Special Reference to Selected Homilies on the Gospel According to St
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1949 An Analysis of the Rhetoric of St. John Chrysostom with Special Reference to Selected Homilies on the Gospel According to St. Matthew Henry A. Toczydlowski Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Toczydlowski, Henry A., "An Analysis of the Rhetoric of St. John Chrysostom with Special Reference to Selected Homilies on the Gospel According to St. Matthew" (1949). Master's Theses. 702. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/702 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1949 Henry A. Toczydlowski AN AN!LYSIS OF THE RHETORIC OF ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOK WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SELECTED HOMILIES ON mE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW' by Henry A. Toozydlowski A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requ1r~ents tor the Degree of Master of Arts in Loyola University June 1949 LIFE Henry A. Toczydlowski was born in Chicago, Illinois, October 20, Be was graduated trom Quigley Preparatory Saainary, Chicago, Illinois, June, 1935, and trom St. Mary ot the Lake Seminary, Mundelein, Ill1Doil, June, 1941, with the degree ot Master ot Arts, and ot Licentiate .t Sacred Theology. He waa ordained priest by Hia Eminenoe Saauel Cardinal &tritoh, Kay 3, 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church of Indianapolis Photograph, 13 February 1916
    Collection # P0108 HOLY TRINITY GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF INDIANAPOLIS PHOTOGRAPH, 13 FEBRUARY 1916 Collection Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Contents Cataloging Information Processed by Dorothy A. Nicholson February 2011 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 1 Cirkut photograph COLLECTION: COLLECTION 13 February 1916 DATES: PROVENANCE: unknown RESTRICTIONS: None COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE Scanned Image Number PAN0610 FORMATS: RELATED Seeds of Faith: Holy Trinity Hellenic Orthodox Church... Pamq: HOLDINGS: BX738.I55 H68 1980 ACCESSION 1981.0647 NUMBER: NOTES: HISTORICAL SKETCH The Greek community in Indianapolis was established in the 1890s and early 20th century when immigrants migrated to the city in search of economic advancement. Once they became established and with World War I in Europe, most chose to remain here. The 1900 census lists 29 Greeks in the Indianapolis area. The small community formed a council to establish an Orthodox church here. In January 1910 the formal charter was incorporated under state law with the name Holy Trinity adopted. The church was first located at 27 South Meridian Street until 1914 when it moved to a house at 213 North West Street. It remained there until 1919 when the neighboring business expanded and the site was traded for a house at 231 North West Street and a brick building was constructed on the site. The church remained at the West Street location until 1960 when it moved to 4011 North Pennsylvania Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Coptic Interpretations of the Fourth Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon
    1 1 Coptic interpretations of the Fourth Ecumenical Council Table of contents 1 The Chalcedon Crisis and Monophysitism 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Misunderstanding 1.3 Common Declaration 1.4 Monophysitism and the Council of Chalcedon 1.5 Two Different Traditions 1.6 Mia Physis 1.7 Mia Physis and Soteriology 1.8 Common Faith 1.9 Recent Efforts for Unity 1.10 Conclusion 2 Agreed Official Statements on Christology with the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches 2.1 Eastern Orthodox Opponents of the Chambesy Union 3 Article by Fr. John S. Romanides 4 Chalcedon (An Analysis) 5 After Chalcedon - Orthodoxy in the 5th/6th Centuries 6 Pope Saint Dioscorus I of Alexandria (Coptic POV) 6.1 Related Saint: St. Timothy Aelurus of Alexandria 6.1.1 The Consecration of St. Timothy 6.1.2 The Murder of Proterius 6.1.3 The Exile of St. Timothy 6.1.4 The Return of St. Timothy from Exile 6.1.5 The Christology of St. Timothy of Alexandria 6.2 Related Event: The Martyrdom of Thirty Thousand Christians in Alexandria 6.3 Related Saint: St. Acacius, Patriarch of Constantinople 6.4 Pope Timothy III of Alexandria, Empress Theodora, and Patriarch Anthimus I of Constantinople 7 The Orthodox Christology of St. Severus of Antioch 8 The Humanity of Christ (What Oriental Orthodox Believe) 9 The One Will and the One Act, By HH Pope Shenouda III of Alexandria 10 Additional/Miscellaneous Notes 2 2 The Chalcedon Crisis and Monophysitism Monophysitism: Reconsidered Mia-Physis By Fr. Matthias F. Wahba St. Antonius Coptic Orthodox Church Hayward, California USA Introduction The Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria, in which I am a priest, is one of the Oriental Orthodox Churches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom an English Translation from the Greek, with Commentary, of the Divine Liturgy of St
    The Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom An English translation from the Greek, with commentary, of the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom The annotations in this edition are extracted from two books by Fr. Alexander Schmemann, of blessed memory: 1) The Eucharist published in 1987, and, 2) For The Life of The World, 1963, 1973, both published by Saint Vladimir’s Seminary Press. Fr. Schmemann died in 1983 at the age of 62 having been Dean of St. Vladimir’s Seminary for the 20 years previously. Any illumination for the reader of the meaning of the Liturgy is directly from Fr. Schmemann’s work; any errors are directly the fault of the extractor. In this edition the quiet prayers of the priest are indicated by being in blue italics, Scripture references are in red, the Liturgical text is in blue, and the commentary is in black. (Traditionally, the service of Orthros is celebrated right before each Liturgy. The traditional end of the Orthros is the Great Doxology. In our church, the end of the Orthros is separated from the Great Doxology by the Studies in the Faith and the Memorials. Thus, it appears that the Great Doxology is the start of The Eucharist, but that is not the case. [ed.]) The Liturgy of the Eucharist is best understood as a journey or procession. It is a journey of the Church into the dimension of the kingdom, the manner of our entrance into the risen life of Christ. It is not an escape from the world, but rather an arrival at a vantage point from which we can see more deeply into the reality of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Autocephalous Churches and the Institution of the 'Pentarchy'
    The Autocephalous Churches and the Institution of the ‘Pentarchy’ Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos and St Vlassios Translation of the article in Greek Οἱ Αὐτοκέφαλες Ἐκκλησίες καί ὁ θεσμός τῆς «Πενταρχίας» Much has been written recently as a result of the Ukrainian issue, both positively and negatively, from whichever side one looks at it. In particular, there has been very harsh criticism of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Prompted by this, it has been necessary for me to write articles so as to explain some aspects of the subject as a whole, without dealing with it exhaustively. In particular, I have clarified that the regime of the Church is not papal, neither is it a Protestant confederation, but it is synodical and hierarchical at the same time [‘The Regime of the Orthodox Church’]. I insist on this subject, because I consider that it is the basis of the problem that has arisen. There are certainly many sides to the Ukrainian ecclesiastical issue. The most fundamental aspect, however, is that many people have not understood what ‘autocephaly’ means in the Orthodox Church; what ‘Autocephalous Churches’ are; how the sacred institution of the Church functions; to what extent ‘Autocephalous Churches’ can function independently of the Ecumenical Throne, which is the first throne and presides over all the Orthodox Churches, and has many powers and responsibilities; and also how the Ecumenical Throne operates in relation to the ‘Autocephalous Churches’. Unless someone has an adequate understanding of the way in which ‘Autocephalous Churches’ function, the way in which the Pentarchy worked in the first millennium, but also of the role of the Ecumenical Patriarch during the second millennium in relation to the more recent Patriarchates and the new Autocephalous Churches, he will not grasp the essence of this issue.
    [Show full text]