The Egnatia Motorway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Egnatia Motorway EX POST EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (ERDF) OR COHESION FUND (CF) IN THE PERIOD 1994-1999 THE EGNATIA MOTORWAY PREPARED BY: CSIL, CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL STUDIES, MILAN PREPARED FOR: EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY POLICY DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION MILAN, SEPTEMBER 5, 2012 This study is carried out by a team selected by the Evaluation Unit, DG Regional Policy, European Commission, through a call for tenders by open procedure no 2010.CE.16.B.AT.036. The consortium selected comprises CSIL – Centre for Industrial Studies (lead partner – Milan) and DKM Economic Consultants (Dublin). The Core Team comprises: - Scientific Director: Massimo Florio, CSIL and University of Milan; - Project Coordinators: Silvia Vignetti and Julie Pellegrin, CSIL; - External experts: Ginés de Rus (University of Las Palmas, Spain), Per-Olov Johansson (Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden) and Eduardo Ley (World Bank, Washington, D.C.); - Senior experts: Ugo Finzi, Mario Genco, Annette Hughes and Marcello Martinez; - Task managers: John Lawlor, Julie Pellegrin and Davide Sartori; - Project analysts: Emanuela Sirtori, Gelsomina Catalano and Rory Mc Monagle. A network of country experts provides the geographical coverage for the field analysis: Roland Blomeyer, Fernando Santos (Blomeyer and Sanz – Guadalajara), Andrea Moroni (CSIL – Milano), Antonis Moussios, Panos Liveris (Eurotec - Thessaloniki), Marta Sánchez-Borràs, Mateu Turró (CENIT – Barcelona), Ernestine Woelger (DKM – Dublin). The authors of this report are Gelsomina Catalano and Davide Sartori of CSIL who were also responsible for the field research. Useful research assistance has been provided by Chiara Pancotti and Stathis Karapanos. The authors are grateful for the very helpful comments from the EC staff and particularly to Veronica Gaffey, José-Luís Calvo de Celis and Kai Stryczynski. They also express their gratitude to all stakeholders who agreed to respond to the team’s questions and contributed to the realisation of the case study. The authors are responsible for any remaining errors or omissions. Quotation is authorised as long as the source is acknowledged. Cover: The Egnatia motorway. Source: Egnatis Odos S.A. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 GREECE’S TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS ................................................................................................... 9 1.3 STRUCTURAL FEATURES AND SERVICE DELIVERED .................................................................................. 13 1.4 CURRENT PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................................. 18 2 ORIGIN AND HISTORY ............................................................................................................... 23 2.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 FINANCING DECISION ...................................................................................................................... 25 2.3 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................. 27 2.4 FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS .................................................................................................................. 30 3 LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT EFFECTS ........................................................................................ 33 3.1 KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 33 3.2 DIRECT ECONOMIC GROWTH ............................................................................................................ 37 3.3 ENDOGENOUS DYNAMICS ................................................................................................................ 45 3.4 INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY .................................................................................................................. 48 3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................................................................................... 48 3.6 TERRITORIAL COHESION ................................................................................................................... 50 3.7 SOCIAL HAPPINESS .......................................................................................................................... 53 4 DETERMINANTS OF PROJECT OUTCOMES .................................................................................. 55 4.1 KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 55 4.2 APPROPRIATENESS TO THE CONTEXT .................................................................................................. 56 4.3 PROJECT DESIGN AND FORECASTING CAPACITY ..................................................................................... 56 4.4 MANAGERIAL RESPONSE .................................................................................................................. 58 4.5 PROJECT GOVERNANCE .................................................................................................................... 58 5 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 63 ANNEX I. METHODOLOGY OF EVALUATION .................................................................................. 67 ANNEX II. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 73 ANNEX III. MAP OF STAKEHOLDERS ............................................................................................. 105 ANNEX IV. GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................. 107 ANNEX V. LIST OF INTERVIEWEES ................................................................................................ 109 ANNEX VI. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 111 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AADT Annual average daily traffic BSEC Black Sea Economic Cooperation CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis CF Cohesion Fund CSF Community Support Framework DG Move Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport DG Regio Directorate General for Regional Policy EC European Commission EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIB European Investment Bank ENPV Economic Net Present Value ERDF European Regional Development Fund ERR Economic Rate of Return ESF European Social Fund ESPON European Spatial Planning Observation Network EU European Union FNPV Financial Net Present Value FYROM The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gas Grd Greek drachma GVA Gross Value Added HR Hour ICT Information and Communication Technology IMF International Monetary Fund IRR Internal Rate of Return MEPPW Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works NGO Non-governmental Organization NPV Net Present Value SA Public limited Company (French abbreviation for Société Anonyme) SCF Standard Conversion Factor TEN-T Trans-European Transport Networks TEUs Twenty-foot Equivalent Units ToRs Terms of references PATHE Patras-Athens-Thessaloniki-Evzonoi motorway PATHE/P Patras-Athens-Thessaloniki-Idomeni/Promachnonas railway PPS Purchasing Power Standard S.A. Public Limited Company (The French abbreviation for Société Anonyme is used in Greece) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This case study analyses the implementation of the Egnatia motorway, a road crossing horizontally Northern Greece with a length of 670 km and a width of 24.5 m (or 22 m along mountainous adverse sections). The motorway runs from Igoumenitsa to Kipoi and crosses five regions: East Macedonia & Thrace, Central Macedonia, West Macedonia, Epirus and Thessaly. The purpose of the evaluation is to assess the socio-economic long-term effects generated by the project and to disentangle the possible determinant factors that may have contributed to producing these effects. More details on the overall evaluation approach are recalled in the Box below and, more extensively, in Annex I. OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY The Conceptual Framework developed in the First Intermediate Report has been developed starting from the evaluation questions included in the ToRs1, and further specified and organised as per the team’s understanding. In particular, the Team identified three relevant dimensions of analysis: a. The object of the evaluation (the ‘WHAT’): this relates to the typologies of long-term contributions which can be observed. Starting with the typologies identified in the ToR (socio-economic development and quality of life) the Team developed the following classification of long-term effects: ‘Economic development’ (including effects on GDP growth and endogenous dynamics) and ‘Quality of life’, synonymous with additional social wellbeing, i.e. including effects that are not captured
Recommended publications
  • Postcollisional Contractional and Extensional Deformation in the Aegean Region
    Downloaded from specialpapers.gsapubs.org on June 15, 2015 Geological Society of America Special Paper 409 2006 Postcollisional contractional and extensional deformation in the Aegean region Sotirios Kokkalas* Paraskevas Xypolias Ioannis Koukouvelas Theodor Doutsos Department of Geology, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece ABSTRACT In the Aegean area, distinct fault patterns with their associated stress regimes are evidenced along a curved convergent plate boundary. In this article, we analyze and review late collisional and extensional structures in five structural regions along the External Hellenides orogenic belt in order to define, primarily, the evolution of on- shore basins and, secondarily, the evolution of off-shore basins and the role of the in- herited structures within the present geotectonic framework. We also evaluate how these structures act on seismicity as well as present-day motion and magmatism in the Aegean area. Northwestern Greece, which corresponds to our Region I, represents an area of active continental collision in which a previously overthickened crust collapsed mainly parallel to the structural grain of the orogen. At present, the most active structures in this region are the northwest-trending thrusts and the northeast-trending normal faults. Strong coupling and the transmission of horizontal forces from the collision front appear to explain the deformation within this region. Central Greece (Region II) displays a mixed type of contractional-extensional deformation. Mesozoic inherited transverse structures are reactivated as WNW- trending faults and appear to accommodate most of the active north-south-trending present-day extension. Deformation in this area appears to be controlled both by roll- back of the subducting slab and by the lateral extrusion of the Anatolia plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Greek Government on the Visit to Greece Carried out by The
    CPT/Inf (2014) 26 Report to the Greek Government on the visit to Greece carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 16 April 2013 The Greek Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2014) 27. Strasbourg, 16 October 2014 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................6 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................6 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................7 C. Consultations held by the delegation.......................................................................................9 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the Greek authorities ....................................................9 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .......................10 F. National Preventive Mechanism ............................................................................................11 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................12 A. Treatment of persons detained by the police........................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Verification of Vulnerable Zones Identified Under the Nitrate Directive \ and Sensitive Areas Identified Under the Urban Waste W
    CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) 1 1.2 THE NITRATES DIRECTIVE (91/676/EEC) 3 1.3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2 THE OFFICIAL GREEK DESIGNATION PROCESS 9 2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SITUATION IN GREECE 9 2.2 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF SENSITIVE AREAS 10 2.3 OFFICIAL DESIGNATION OF VULNERABLE ZONES 14 1 INTRODUCTION This report is a review of the areas designated as Sensitive Areas in conformity with the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC and Vulnerable Zones in conformity with the Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC in Greece. The review also includes suggestions for further areas that should be designated within the scope of these two Directives. Although the two Directives have different objectives, the areas designated as sensitive or vulnerable are reviewed simultaneously because of the similarities in the designation process. The investigations will focus upon: • Checking that those waters that should be identified according to either Directive have been; • in the case of the Nitrates Directive, assessing whether vulnerable zones have been designated correctly and comprehensively. The identification of vulnerable zones and sensitive areas in relation to the Nitrates Directive and Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive is carried out according to both common and specific criteria, as these are specified in the two Directives. 1.1 THE URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE (91/271/EEC) The Directive concerns the collection, treatment and discharge of urban wastewater as well as biodegradable wastewater from certain industrial sectors. The designation of sensitive areas is required by the Directive since, depending on the sensitivity of the receptor, treatment of a different level is necessary prior to discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion and Other Human Rights for Non-Muslim Minorities in Turkey and for the Muslim Minority in Thrace (Eastern Greece)
    Doc. 11860 21 April 2009 Freedom of religion and other human rights for non-Muslim minorities in Turkey and for the Muslim minority in Thrace (Eastern Greece) Report Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Rapporteur: Mr Michel HUNAULT, France, European Democrat Group Summary In the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Greece and Turkey should have all their citizens belonging to religious minorities treated in accordance with the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, rather than rely on the “reciprocity” principle stated by the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne to withhold the application of certain rights. The committee acknowledges that the question is “emotionally very highly charged”, but it asserts that the two countries should treat all their citizens without discrimination, regardless of the way in which the neighbouring state may treat its own citizens. The committee considers that the recurrent invoking by Greece and Turkey of the principle of reciprocity as a basis for refusing to implement the rights secured to the minorities concerned by the Treaty of Lausanne is “anachronistic” and could jeopardise each country's national cohesion. However, it welcomes some recent indications that the authorities of the two countries have gained a certain awareness, with a view to finding appropriate responses to the difficulties faced by the members of these minorities, and encourages them to continue their efforts in that direction. The committee therefore urges the two countries to take measures for the members of the religious minorities – particularly as regards education and the right to own property – and to ensure that the members of these minorities are no longer perceived as foreigners in their own country.
    [Show full text]
  • Misunderstood and Forgotten: the Greek Naval Mutiny of April 1944 Mark C
    Misunderstood and Forgotten 367 Misunderstood and Forgotten: The Greek Naval Mutiny of April 1944 Mark C. Jones Abstract After being driven from Greece by the German military in 1941, the Royal Hellenic Navy (RHN) operated alongside Britain’s Royal Navy (RN) from bases in Egypt, Lebanon, and Malta. In April 1944 the RHN experienced a widespread mutiny, which began in Alexandria, Egypt, over the political composition of the Greek government. This essay explores the importance of the Alexandria mutiny to the RHN. It investigates the role of the navy in the royalist/republican rivalry of the 1920s–1930s, the wartime return to service of republican officers, the RHN’s operations under British direction in the eastern Mediterranean, the political orientation of the government-in-exile, disturbances in the RHN prior to the mutiny, the events of the mutiny itself, the aftermath of the mutiny, how the mutiny affected the RN-RHN relationship, and the significance of the mutiny within the context of naval history in general. Wartime RN records held at the Public Record Office outside London, United States Navy intelligence reports held at the National Archives and Records Administration at College Park, Maryland, as well as unpublished and published secondary sources, provide the basis of this investigation. Multinational naval operations are a common occurrence in today’s world. While the United States Navy is presently the most powerful in the world, it frequently operates with ships from allied navies to reach its security goals. Such allied cooperation dates back to World War II when escort groups in the Battle of the Atlantic were composed of ships from the U.S., Canadian, and Royal Navies along with a handful of Polish, Free French, Norwegian, and Dutch ships.
    [Show full text]
  • PTWM210I) Uit Te Breiden Met Meer Wandel- En/Of Rustdagen
    AnnaHiking Actieve vakanties in Griekenland www.annahiking.nl Zuid-Pindos individueel: 8-daagse minitrekking door het Tzoumerka en Lakmos gebergte en langs de Arachthos rivier 2020 (PTWM210I) Uit te breiden met meer wandel- en/of rustdagen. Onze wandelfilosofie: overdag lekker actief, dan ’s avonds een goede maaltijd, een warme douche en een comfortabel bed in een kleinschalige accommodatie. We nodigen je uit om met ons mee te gaan! meer informatie: www.annahiking.nl (6-4-2020) PTWM210I: 8-daagse minitrekking Zuid-Pindos Over AnnaHiking Wij zijn verstokte Griekenlandgangers, met sinds 2009 een eigen huis in het berggebied onder Ioannina. Onze liefde voor het land, de cultuur, het klimaat, het eten, de taal en de inwoners is gegroeid sinds we er in 1991 voor het eerst voet aan de grond zetten. We voelen ons er thuis, en willen dat gevoel graag overbrengen. Veel mensen kennen Griekenland van “de eilanden”: is er dan nog meer? Jazeker, het bergachtige vasteland biedt de traditionele levenswijze, dicht bij de natuur, met ruige bergen en diepe rivierkloven. Geen stranden, maar klaterende watervallen, kleine huizen die zich aan de bergwand vastklampen en een hartelijke en gastvrije bevolking. Dát is het Griekenland waarmee we je graag willen laten kennismaken. Hier hebben we diverse routes uitgezet en in detail beschreven. We lopen ze ook regelmatig na en passen de beschrijvingen aan als dat nodig is. Als individuele reiziger krijg je deze routebeschrijvingen mee, met GPS-tracks en ingetekende kaartjes, zodat je de route makkelijk kunt vinden. Ook krijg je achtergrondinformatie mee, plekken waar je lekker kunt eten en allerlei andere handige tips en weetjes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Flood Events at Hydroelectric Plant Areas in Western Greece Msc
    Dealing with Flood Events at Hydroelectric Plant Areas in Western Greece MSc. Christos Roilos Geologist - Seismologist Dam Safety Sector, Hydroelectric Generation Department, Public Power Corporation Annual Precipitation in Greece (millimetres in height) The Hydroelectric development from 1950 up to date Greece is an over 80 % mountainous country with a complicated rugged relief and a variety of climates Hydroelectric Power Plants are situated in the northwestern part, where most of the mountains are located 1950-1975 8 large Hydroelectric Power Plants, totaling 1.410 MW, were built. Among them the 3 biggest ones : Agras, Ladhon, Louros, Tavropos, Kremasta, Kastraki, Edessaios, Polyphyto 1976 up to date 9 large & 5 small Hydroelectric Power Plants, totalling 1.800,2 MW, were built. Among them the two pump storage plants: Pournari I & II, Sfikia, Assomata, Stratos I, Stratos II, Pighai Aoos, Thissavros, Platanovryssi, Ghiona, Makrochori, Aghia Varvara, Ilarion HPP, Ilarion SHPP The actual situation of PPC Hydroelectric Power Plants - Acheloos r. Hydro Scheme (Kremasta, Kastraki, Stratos-I): 907,2 MW - Aliakmon r. Hydro Scheme (Ilarion, Polyphyto, Sfikia, Assomata / Agras, Edessaios): 1020,0 MW - Arachthos r. Hydro Scheme (Pournari-I, Pournari-II / Aoos): 543,6 MW - Nestos r. Hydro Scheme (Thissavros-Platanovryssi): 500 MW - N. Plastiras HPP (Tavropos r.): 129,9 MW - Ladon HPP (Ladon r.): 70 MW - Small HPP: 46,7 MW TOTAL: 3.217,4 MW The planning for dealing with the flood events a) anti-flood protection of the river side areas, b) hydroelectric installations safety, and c) maximizing power generation. The anti-flood protection rendered by a dam along with the relevant reservoir is proportionate to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Issued by Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion Or Belief Purpose Preparation for the Report to the 46Th Session of Human Rights Council
    Avrupa Batı Trakya Türk Federasyonu Föderation der West-Thrakien Türken in Europa Federation of Western Thrace Turks in Europe Ευρωπαϊκή Ομοσπονδία Τούρκων Δυτικής Θράκης Fédération des Turcs de Thrace Occidentale en Europe NGO in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations Member of the Fundamental Rights Platform (FRP) of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Member of the Federal Union of European Nationalities (FUEN) Call for input: Report on Anti-Muslim Hatred and Discrimination Deadline 30 November 2020 Issued by Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Purpose Preparation for the report to the 46th Session of Human Rights Council Submitted by: Name of the Organization: Federation of Western Thrace Turks in Europe (ABTTF) Main contact person(s): Mrs. Melek Kırmacı Arık E-mail: [email protected] 1. Please provide information on what you understand by the terms Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hatred; on the intersection between anti-Muslim hatred, racism and xenophobia and on the historical and modern contexts, including geopolitical, socio-and religious factors, of anti-Muslim hatred. There are numerous definitions of Islamophobia which are influenced by different theoretical approaches. The Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research, which annualy publish European Islamophobia Report, uses the working definition of Islamophobia that theorizes Islamophobia as anti-Muslim racism. The Foundation notes that Islamophobia is about a dominant group of people aiming at seizing, stabilizing and widening their power by means of defining a scapegoat – real or invented – and excluding this scapegoat from the resources/rights/definition of a constructed ‘we’.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilakis Nation and Its Ruins.Pdf
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Impact Observatory of the Egnatia Motorway
    - Vassilys Fourkas - Zoe Papasiopi - Athena Giannakou SEMSON, Final Seminar, 11-12.04.2008, Thessaloniki 1 Egnatia –TENs& Pan European Corridors 2 3 4 5 6 Egnatia motorway project status, Feb. 2008 7 Egnatia Odos Motorway: axis of growth and collaboration 8 Egnatia Odos Observatory monitoring and assessing the spatial impacts of the motorway The Observatory develops a methodological and operational framework, which applies well-documented scientific methods and modern GIS & Internet infrastructure, in order to collect and provide reliable and updated information and data for the monitoring and assessment of the Egnatia Odos Motorway’s spatial impacts. This information concerns: • the mobility in and accessibility to regions, urban centres, markets, and services, • the development level, the cohesion degree, the competitiveness, and the intraregional inequalities, • the building development and the networking of urban centres, • the properties of the transport system and the operation of the road network, and • the quality of the environment. 9 10 11 Egnatia Odos Observatory • The INDICATORS OF SPATIAL IMPACTS monitored by the Observatory fall into three major groups: (a) Socio-Economic, (b) Environmental, and (c) Transport. In total, there are approximately 50 indicators that are updated and appropriately adapted according to the scientific and operational requirements. • IMPACT ZONES ¾ 60% in-house ¾ 40% out-sourcing 12 Code Social-Economic and & Spatial Planning Indicators SET01 Benefited population System of indicators revised 2008
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Issn 2654-1823
    SAFEGREECE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ISSN 2654-1823 14-17.10 proceedings SafeGreece 2020 – 7th International Conference on Civil Protection & New Technologies 14‐16 October, on‐line | www.safegreece.gr/safegreece2020 | [email protected] Publisher: SafeGreece [www.safegreece.org] Editing, paging: Katerina – Navsika Katsetsiadou Title: SafeGreece 2020 on‐line Proceedings Copyright © 2020 SafeGreece SafeGreece Proceedings ISSN 2654‐1823 SafeGreece 2020 on-line Proceedings | ISSN 2654-1823 index About 1 Committees 2 Topics 5 Thanks to 6 Agenda 7 Extended Abstracts (Oral Presentations) 21 New Challenges for Multi – Hazard Emergency Management in the COVID-19 Era in Greece Evi Georgiadou, Hellenic Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (ELINYAE) 23 An Innovative Emergency Medical Regulation Model in Natural and Manmade Disasters Chih-Long Pan, National Yunlin University of Science and technology, Taiwan 27 Fragility Analysis of Bridges in a Multiple Hazard Environment Sotiria Stefanidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 31 Nature-Based Solutions: an Innovative (Though Not New) Approach to Deal with Immense Societal Challenges Thanos Giannakakis, WWF Hellas 35 Coastal Inundation due to Storm Surges on a Mediterranean Deltaic Area under the Effects of Climate Change Yannis Krestenitis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 39 Optimization Model of the Mountainous Forest Areas Opening up in Order to Prevent and Suppress Potential Forest Fires Georgios Tasionas, Democritus University of Thrace 43 We and the lightning Konstantinos Kokolakis,
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter August 2011 – December 2011
    Program for the Education of Roma Children Regions of Central Macedonia, Western Macedonia, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace 21.09.2010 – 31.12.2013 Newsletter August 2011 – December 2011 Beginning of classes addressed Literacy courses for to students who had been grade adolescents retained in Dendropotamos, In the settlements of Agia Sofia Alexandria and Kymina- and Peraia, literacy courses for Malgara. illiterate Roma adolescents begin. A direct positive outcome of Three philologists and a support classes was that sixteen mathematician teach in these 3rd grade students of the Junior courses and 56 adolescents High School of Menemeni, in participate (Agia Sofia: 39 Dendropotamos passed to the 1st students, Peraia: 17 students). grade of Senior High School. The support for children in this transitory phase of their education is estimated to contribute to its continuation and completion. Thus, upon the children’s request and given the fact that support teaching is no longer offered to Junior and Senior High Schools, support classes are scheduled and take place during the whole academic year 2011-2012 in Junior and Senior High Schools in Menemeni, Alexandria, Kymina- Malgara and Kouloura October 2011 October 3 Introductory training for teachers in the primary schools and the kindergarten of Menemeni, in Dendropotamos. October 4 Introductory in-service training for teachers in the primary schools of Peraia and the cross-cultural primary school of Neoi Epivates. October 6 In-service training for philologists and mathematicians of the Program, regarding teaching approaches in mathematics and language. October 7 Introductory training in the primary and kindergarten schools of Veroia, Kouloura and Xehasmeni.
    [Show full text]