DOCSLIB.ORG

Thrifty Payless Dba Rite Aid V. Hillside Plaza, LTD Dba Hillside Plaza Properties : Brief of Appellee Utah Court of Appeals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thrifty Payless Dba Rite Aid V. Hillside Plaza, LTD Dba Hillside Plaza Properties : Brief of Appellee Utah Court of Appeals Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 2003 Thrifty Payless dba Rite Aid v. Hillside Plaza, LTD dba Hillside Plaza Properties : Brief of Appellee Utah Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Bruce Wycoff; Billie Siddoway; Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough; Cynthia K.C. Meyer; Attorneys for Plaintiff/ Appellee. Scott .O Mercer; Ryan B. Hancey; Kesler & Rust; Attorneys for Defendant/ Appellant. Recommended Citation Brief of Appellee, Thrifty Payless dba Rite Aid v. Hillside Plaza, LTD dba Hillside Plaza Properties, No. 20030129 (Utah Court of Appeals, 2003). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/4205 This Brief of Appellee is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Court of Appeals Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC., d/b/a RITE AID Plaintiff/ Appellee v. HILLSIDE PLAZA, LTD., d/b/a HILLSIDE PLAZA PROPERTIES Defendant / Appellant BRIEF OF APPELLEE RITE AID HILLSIDE PLAZA, LTD., d/b/a HILLSIDE PLAZA PROPERTIES, No. 20030129-CA Plaintiff/Appellant, v. THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. and AMERICAN DRUG STORES, INC. Defendants/Appellees. Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah The Honorable Timothy R. Hanson Bruce Wycoff (#4448) BiliieSiddoway(#9710) JONES, WALDO, HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGHPC 170 South Main #1500 Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801)521-3200 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee Scott O. Mercer Ryan B. Hancey KESLER & RUST 36 South State Street, Suite 2000 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Attorneys for Defendant / Appellant JUL 1 Digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU. Paulette Stagg Machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Clerk of the Court IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC., d/b/a RITE AID Plaintiff/ Appellee v. HILLSIDE PLAZA, LTD., d/b/a HILLSIDE PLAZA PROPERTIES Defendant / Appellant BRIEF OF APPELLEE RITE AID HILLSIDE PLAZA, LTD., d/b/a HILLSIDE PLAZA PROPERTIES, No. 20030129-CA Plaintiff/Appellant, v. THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. and AMERICAN DRUG STORES, INC., Defendants/Appellees. Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah The Honorable Timothy R. Hanson Bruce Wycoff (#4448) BillieSiddoway(#9710) JONES, WALDO, HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGH PC 170 South Main #1500 Lake City, Utah 84101 , Telephone: (801)521-3200 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee Scott O. Mercer Ryan B. Hancey KESLER&RUST 36 South State Street, Suite 2000 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Attorneys for Defendant / Appellant Digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU. Machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Authorities iii Statement of Jurisdiction 1 Statement Regarding the Issues 1 Determinative Constitutional Provisions, Statutes, Ordinances and Rules 3 Statement of the Case 4 I. Nature of the Case 4 II. Course of the Proceedings 4 III. Statement Regarding the Trial Court's Findings of Relevant Facts 4 Summary of Argument 8 Argument 10 I. Hillside Was Not, and Is Not, Entitled to Summary Judgment 10 A. Hillside Never Raised the Rule 4-501 Issue before the Trial Court 11 B. This Court Should View the Facts in a Light Most Likely to Create Factual Questions 12 C. A Party Seeking Summary Judgment Has the Burden of Establishing All "Facts" By Competent Evidence; Until the Movant Does So, the Non-Moving Party Has No Duty to Respond 12 D. Hillside Did Not Prove the Absence of Factual Issues Regarding the January 21, 1997 Letter on Which It So Heavily Relies 13 1. Hillside Did Not "Properly Support" Its Naked Assertion That It "Sent" the Annette Johnson Letter to Rite Aid 14 2. Rite Aid "Specifically Controverted" Hillside's Claim That It Sent the Annette Johnson Letter 16 II. Rite Aid Properly Interpreted Hillside's September 2, 1996 Letter (Exhibit 3) as Changing the Address Only for Rent and Rent-Related Correspondence; Rite Aid Timely Sent Its Renewal Notice to the Correct Address 17 Digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU. Machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. I A. The Trial Court Found Exhibit 3 to Be Unambiguous 17 1. Exhibit 2 Sets the Stage for Exhibit 3 by Providing a Change of Address for All Mail 18 2. Hillside Management Sends Exhibit 3, Providing a Change of Address for Rent Payments Only 19 3. The Dispute before this Court Is Whether Rite Aid Sent Its Notice of Renewal to the Correct Address 19 B. Analysis of the Evidence 21 1. The Trial Court Properly Admitted Baker's Testimony to Address Factual Questions regarding Common Practices in the Commercial Leasing Industry 24 2. Hillside's Alleged Impeachment of Baker's Testimony Does Not Alter the Court's Findings of Fact or Have Any Impact on the Outcome of the Case 25 3. Hillside's Correspondence with Reth Did Not Effectively Change the Address to which Rite Aid Should Send Legal Notices 28 4. Nothing in Exhibit 55 Effectively Changed Hillside's Address for Legal Notices 31 III. Even if Rite Aid Were Mistaken In Its Reading of Exhibit 3, the Trial Court Correctly Found that Mistake to be Equitably Excused 322 IV. The Trial Court's Attorney Fee Award to Rite Aid Was Justified and Proper 388 A. The Lease Provides that Hillside, As the Breaching Party, Is Liable to Rite Aid for Attorneys Fees 388 B. The Trial Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Awarding Attorney Fees in a Reasonable Amount 40 Conclusion 43 ADDENDA A. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law & Order (R. 975-988) B. March 19, 1992 Letter from CPMC (Exhibit 2) C. September 2, 1996 Letter from Annette Johnson (Exhibit 3) D. Lease (Exhibit 51) Digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU. Machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co., 966 P.2d 844 (Utah 1998) 11 Bank of Salt Lake v. The Corp. ofPres. of the Church of Jesus Christ ofLatter- Day Saints, 534 P.2d 887 (Utah 1975) 30 Craig Food Industrial v. Weihing, 746 P.2d 279 (Utah 1987) 24 DeBry v. Cascade Enterprises, 935 P.2d 499 (Utah 1984) 1 Dixie State Bank v. Bracken, 764 P.2d 985 (Utah 1988) 38, 40, 43 Eggett v. Wasatch Energy Corp., 2001 UT App 226, f 42, 29 P.3d 668, 676 23 Estate Landscaping & Snow Removal v. Mountain States Telegraph & Telegraph Co., 844 P.2d 322 (Utah 1992) 1,12 Faulkner v. Farnsworth, 665 P.2d 1292 (Utah 1983) 17 Geisdorfv. Doughty, 972 P.2d 67 (Utah 1998) 2, 34, 35 Grobergv. Housing Opportunities, Inc., 2003 UT App 67, 68 P.3d 1015 11 Hardy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of Am., 763 P.2d 761 (Utah 1988) 30 Harris v. IESAssocs. Inc., 2003 UT App. 112, 69 P.3d 297 2, 8, 23 Katz v. Pierce, 732 P.2d 92 (Utah 1986) 11 Kuhre v. Goodfellow, 2003 UT App 85,17, 69 P.3d 286 12 Lefavi v. Bertoch, 2000 UT App 5, 994 P.2d 817 7 Litster v. Utah Valley Community College, 881 P.2d 933 (Utah Ct. App. 1994) 14 Martindale v. Adams, 111 P.2d 514 (Utah Ct. App. 1989) 43 Petersen v. Board of Education Of Davis County School Dist., 855 P.2d 241 (Utah 1993) 12 Provo River Water Users Associate v. Morgan, 857 P.2d 927 (Utah 1993) 2, 17, 23 R&R Energies v. Mother Earth Indus., Inc., 936 P.2d 1068 (Utah 1997) 17 Digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU. Machine-generated OCR,iii may contain errors. Richard Barton Enterprises v. Tsern, 928 P.2d 368 (Utah 1996) 3, 40, 43 Saunders v. Sharp, 806P.2d 198 (Utah 1991) 34 Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc., 2003 UT 23, 70 P.3d 904 12, 13 Sprouse v. Jager, 806 P.2d 219 (Utah Ct. App. 1991) 17, 22, 24 State v. Ashe, 745 P.2d 1255 (Utah 1987) 25 Thrifty Payless v. Hillside Plaza Ltd., 2001 UT App 296 (Utah Ct. App. 2001) 38 Trolley Square Associates v. Nielson, 886 P.2d 61 (Utah Ct. App. 1994) 3, 34 U.S. Realty 86 Assocs. v. Security Inv., Ltd., 2002 UT 14,40 P.3d 586 2, 3, 34, 37 Utah Coal & Lumber Restaurant, Inc. v. Outdoors Adventures Unlimited, 2001 UT 100,40 P.3d 581 2, 34-37 Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National America Title Ins. Co., 749 P.2d 651 (Utah 1988) 3,38 Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp., 762 P.2d 1090 (Utah 1988) 29 STATE STATUTES Utah Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(5)(A) 1 Utah Rule of Judicial Administration 4-501 8, 11, 13 OTHER AUTHORITIES None Digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU. Machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co., 966 P.2d 844 (Utah 1998) Bank of Salt Lake v. The Corp. of Pres. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 534 P.2d 887 (Utah 1975) Craig Food Indus, v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 1 of 239 05-Jun-2019 7:38:44 State of California Dept. of Alcoholic
    05-Jun-2019 State of California Page 1 of 239 7:38:44 Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control List of All Surrendered Retail Licenses in MONROVIA District File M Dup Current Type GEO Primary Name DBA Name Type Number I Count Status Status Date Dist Prem Street Address ------ ------------ - -------- ------------- ----------------- -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 20 250606 Y SUREND 02/25/2017 1900 KOJONROJ, PONGPUN DBA: MINI A 1 MART 2 11550 COLIMA RD WHITTIER, CA 90604 61 274544 Y SUREND 04/17/2017 1900 JUAREZ MUNOZ, BARTOLO DBA: CAL TIKI BAR 2 3835 WHITTIER BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90023-2430 20 389309 Y SUREND 12/13/2017 1900 BOULOS, LEON MORID DBA: EDDIES MINI MART 2 11236 WHITTIER BLVD WHITTIER, CA 90606 48 427779 Y SUREND 12/04/2015 1900 OCEANS SPORTS BAR INC DBA: OCEANS SPORTS BAR 2 14304-08 TELEGRAPH RD ATTN FREDERICK ALANIS WHITTIER, CA 90604-2905 41 507614 Y SUREND 02/04/2019 1900 GUANGYANG INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT INC DBA: LITTLE SHEEP MONGOLIAN HOT POT 2 1655 S AZUSA AVE STE E HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745-3829 21 512694 Y SUREND 04/02/2014 1900 HONG KONG SUPERMARKET OF HACIENDA HEIGHTS,DBA: L HONGTD KONG SUPERMARKET 2 3130 COLIMA RD HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745-6301 41 520103 Y SUREND 07/24/2018 1900 MAMMA'S BRICK OVEN, INC. DBA: MAMMAS BRICK OVEN PIZZA & PASTA 2 311 S ROSEMEAD BLVD #102-373 PASADENA, CA 91107-4954 47 568538 Y SUREND 09/27/2018 1900 HUASHI GARDEN DBA: HUASHI GARDEN 2 19240 COLIMA RD ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748-3004 41 571291 Y SUREND 12/08/2018 1900 JANG'S FAMILY CORPORATION DBA: MISONG 2 18438 COLIMA RD STE 107 ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748-5822 41 571886 Y SUREND 07/16/2018 1900 BOO FACTOR LLC DBA: AMY'S PATIO CAFE 2 900 E ALTADENA DR ALTADENA, CA 91001-2034 21 407121 Y SUREND 06/08/2015 1901 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA: RALPHS 199 2 345 E MAIN ST ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 05-Jun-2019 State of California Page 2 of 239 7:38:44 Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Drug Agreement
    RETAIL DRUG AGREEMENT July 15, 2018 - July 17, 2021 between THRIFTY PAYLESS INC. D/B/A RITE AID and UFCW LOCALS 135, 324, 770, 1167, 1428, 1442, and 8GS INDEX ARTICLE 1 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS .................................................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE 2 - BARGAINING UNIT .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 UNION RECOGNITION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 INCLUDED BARGAINING UNIT WORK ................................................................................................................. 2 2.2.1 Current Work ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.2 Future Work ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.3 Employee Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.3.1 Intern Pharmacist .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2.3.2 Drug Clerk .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beverly Hills Living in the City
    city • Measure E’s donations have come briefs • Board wrestles over send- rudy cole • Just What from financially invested firms Page 3 ing lawyers to city meetings Page 5 You Wanted, More Hilton Page 6 ALSO ON THE WEB Beverly Hills www.bhweekly.com Living In The City WeeklySERVING BEVERLY HILLS • BEVERLYWOOD • LOS ANGELES Issue 471 • October 9 - October 15, 2008 HowHow willwill BeverlyBeverly HillsHills bebe impactedimpacted byby thethe unsteadyunsteady economy?economy? OUR 9th Anniversary cover story • page 9 KBeverly High Robbers hit jewelry Finding Some Humor In • • • project of three towers. will reduce the area of their nine-acre photosClass of '88 Reunion Page 4 sbriefstore on Beverly Drive Page 5 rudyTroubling Times,cole Hopefully Page 6 ALSO ON THE WEB Secondly, this is NOT a hotel project that property that is covered by buildings from Beverly Hills www.bhweekly.com adds financial benefits to the city. It is a 67% to 47%. A twenty percent reduction letters condo project that adds huge benefits to is not much when you consider how much WeeklySERVING BEVERLY HILLS • BEVERLYWOOD • LOS ANGELES the developer’s pocket from the quick of the area viewed from the streets will be Issue 470 • October 2 - October 8, 2008 return of their investment upon the sale of covered by concrete and that all three new & the condos. City Council and Planning towers are adjacent to streets. Also, the Living In The City email Commissioners agreed about the benefits Hilton never gives you a sense of how of having an additional luxury hotel in our much green you will actually see from the “Stone and Lawn Signs of the Times” city since we receive a major portion of exterior, not much.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District Of
    Case 3:11-cv-02508-MMA-KSC Document 20 Filed 04/20/12 Page 1 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FRANCINE LOMELI, CASE NO. 11-CV-2508-MMA(KSC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 12 vs. REMAND; and 13 [Doc. No. 4] 14 GRANTING IN PART COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 15 et al., DISMISS 16 Defendants. [Doc. No. 3] 17 On October 28, 2011, Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation and Keith Paget removed 18 this action from state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441(b). Pending before the Court are 19 Defendants’ motion to dismiss and Plaintiff Francine Lomeli’s motion to remand. Fundamental to 20 the resolution of both motions is whether section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 21 U.S.C. § 185, preempts Plaintiff’s state law claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court 22 finds that section 301 preempts Plaintiff’s first claim for breach of the implied covenant of good 23 faith and fair dealing and DISMISSES the claim for failure to exhaust collective bargaining 24 grievance procedures. The Court exercises supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims for 25 false imprisonment and defamation and DISMISSES these claims as time-barred. Finally, the 26 Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining claims for 27 intentional infliction of emotional distress and for violation of California Business and Professions 28 Code § 17200 and REMANDS these claims to the state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordered Published Apr 15 2015
    FILED 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED APR 15 2015 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5 6 In re: ) BAP Nos. NV-14-1468-DJuKu ) NV-14-1469-DJuKu 7 TONYA CAROL HEERS, ) (Related Appeals) ) 8 Debtor. ) Bk. No. 2:13-bk-19887-LED ) 9 ) Adv. Nos. 2:14-ap-01029-LED TONYA CAROL HEERS, ) 2:14-ap-01030-LED 10 ) Appellant, ) 11 ) v. ) O P I N I O N 12 ) DARRELL PARSONS, JR.; AMERICAN) 13 CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY,) ) 14 Appellees. ) ______________________________) 15 Argued and Submitted on March 19, 2015 16 at Las Vegas, Nevada 17 Filed - April 15, 2015 18 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada 19 Honorable Laurel E. Davis, Bankruptcy Judge, Presiding 20 21 Appearances: William L. McGimsey argued for appellant Tonya Carol Heers; Abran E. Vigil of Ballard Spahr LLP 22 argued for appellee Darrell Parsons, Jr.; Misty Perry Isaacson of Pagter and Perry Isaacson, 23 APLC, argued for appellee American Contractors Indemnity Company. 24 25 Before: DUNN, JURY and KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judges. 26 Opinion by Judge Dunn Dissent by Judge Kurtz 27 28 1 DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge: 2 3 Debtor defendant appellant Tonya Carol Heers (“Debtor”) 4 appeals summary judgment orders in two separate adversary 5 proceedings excepting debts from her discharge under 6 § 523(a)(4)1 for defalcations while acting in a fiduciary 7 capacity. We AFFIRM. 8 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 9 The facts in these two related appeals are not in dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • 182 Lawsuits
    Page 1 1. Hubbard, et al v. Autozone Parts Inc, et al, 3:05cv1017, 5/11/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara J 2. Hubbard, et al v. Project M Worldwide, et al, 3:05cv987, 5/6/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara J 3. Hubbard v. Lucky Stores Inc, et al, 3:05cv988, 5/6/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara 4. Hubbard, et al v. Pep Boys Manny Moe, et al, 3:05cv911, 4/28/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara J 5. Hubbard, et al v. CSK Auto Inc, et al, 3:05cv651, 4/1/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara J 6. Hubbard, et al v. Cocos Restaurants, et al, 3:05cv653, 4/1/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara J 7. Hubbard, et al v. Vine Ripe Market Inc, et al, 3:05cv607, 3/28/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ... Hubbard, Lynn J; Hubbard, Barbara J 8. Hubbard, et al v. Claim Jumper, et al, 3:05cv367, 2/23/2005, 440 Other Civil Rights, US District Court for the Southern District of California ..
    [Show full text]
  • CDPH/OA/ADAP) Pharmacy Network Listing June 24, 2016
    California Department of Public Health Office of AIDS, AIDS Drug Assistance Program (CDPH/OA/ADAP) Pharmacy Network Listing June 24, 2016 DIRECTORY OF CITIES Directory of cities .......................................................................................................................................................1 ACTON, CA ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 ADELANTO, CA ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 ALAMEDA, CA ...................................................................................................................................................... 22 ALBANY, CA .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 ALHAMBRA, CA .................................................................................................................................................... 24 ALISO VIEJO, CA ................................................................................................................................................... 25 ALTADENA, CA ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 AMERICAN CANYON, CA .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PBM Contract
    CONTRACT NUMBER: SUBRECIPIENT * N19069 YES NO FFATA FORM REQUIRED PERSONAL SERVICE YES NO YES NO * see Attachment 2 THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the state of Washington Department of Health, hereinafter referred to as DOH, and the party whose name appears below, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor. CONTRACTOR NAME and ADDRESS: Ramsell Public Health Rx, LLC 200 Webster Street, Suite 200 Oakland, CA 94607 UBI #: 602-114-176 IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: PURPOSE: The purpose of this contract is to provide pharmacy benefits management services for clients of the DOH Early Intervention Program. STATEMENT OF WORK: The Contractor shall provide the all necessary personnel, equipment, materials, goods and services and otherwise do all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of the work as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance under this contract shall be from January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. No billable activity may take place until this contract has been signed by both parties. DEPARTMENT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES APPROVAL: In the event this agreement is designated above as a personal service: Under the provisions of Chapter 39.29 RCW, personal services contract(s) and amendments may be required to be filed with the Department of Enterprise Services (DES) for approval. No contract or amendment required to be so filed is effective and no work thereunder shall be commenced nor payment made therefore until ten (10) working days following the date of filing, and, if required, until approved by DES.
    [Show full text]
  • RETAIL PHARMACIST AGREEMENT Between THRIFTY PAYLESS INC
    RETAIL PHARMACIST AGREEMENT between THRIFTY PAYLESS INC. D/B/A RITE AID and UFCW LOCALS 135, 324,770, 1167, 1428 1442 and 8GS JULY 12, 2015 - JULY 14, 2018 I N D E X Page ARTICLE 1 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS .............................................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE 2 - BARGAINING UNIT .............................................................................................................................. .......... 1 2.1 UNION RECOGNITION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 INCLUDED BARGAINING UNIT WORK ............................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 Current Work ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.2 Future Work .............................................................................................................................. .......................... 2 2.2.3 Employee Definitions .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.3.6 Probationary Employees .............................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 EXCLUDED BARGAINING UNIT WORK ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc. 1221 Avenue
    International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc. VOL. 35 ISSUE 1 2015 SPRING 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 41st floor, New York, NY 10020-1099 Phone (646) 728-3800 In Depth Cases “But, Judge, Our Words Meant So Much More!” Howard Jeruchimowitz _________________________________ 19 Another Example of the Perils of Assignment and Continuing Lease Obligations __________ 19 Strict Construction Lisa Winnick ________________________ 2 Owner Liability for Injury _____________________________ 19 Shopping Center Development—Damages How to Ensure That Your Agreement Is Worth for Injunction ________________________________________ 20 More than the Paper It Is Printed On: Strategies for Dealing with the Fraud Exception From Canada to the Parol Evidence Rule Michael Di Geronimo ____________ 4 Parking Woes: The Supreme Court of Canada Sides with the Municipality Fredric L. Carsley ________________ 21 Enforcement of Co-tenancy Remedies: A Review of Grand Prospect Partners, What Are Your Intentions? Letters of Intent in Real Estate L.P. v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. Transactions S. Ronald Haber __________________________ 23 M. Rosie Rees and Stephanie J. Kim ________________________ 9 Honesty Is the. LAW! Evolution of Shopping Center Signage Creates New Natalie Vukovich and Deborah Watkins ____________________ 25 Legal Issues for Landlords and Tenants Daniel K. Wright, II, Clifford S. Mendelsohn and An Update on a “Distressing” Canadian Remedy Lauren H. Bragin ______________________________________ 12 Jamie Paquin _________________________________________ 27 Anti-Assignment Clause: “ So What ?,” Says the Third Circuit Steven B. Smith and Dana Gale Hefter ______________________________________ 17 Shopping Center Legal Update is published by the Legal Department of the International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 41st floor, New York, NY 10020-1099.
    [Show full text]
  • Sep 0 5 2018 C 7 2 01 3
    Dept. A-L Assigned rte. FILED 1 STUART PURDY, CA Bar No. 183151 4 Superior Court of California CONOR NIDEFFER, CA BAR No. 253931 County of I_os Annoles 2 SIMON GREENSTONE PANATIER, P. C. SEP 0 5 2018 3780 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 540 3 Long Beach, California 90806 Sherri R. • w^^irrt,'ierk of Court By Deputy fem. Telephone (562) 590-3400 4 Facsimile (562) 590-3412 j;Wy Smith 5 JOHN M. CARON, Esq., CA Bar No. 130633 THE LAW OFFICE OF WORTHINGTON & CARON, P. C. 6 273 W. 7th Street San Pedro, California 90731 7 Telephone (310) 221-8090 Facsimile (310) 221-8095 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 13 C 7 2 01 3 14 LINDA ZIMMERMAN, Case No. B 15 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY- ASBESTOS (NEGLIGENCE; STRICT LIABILITY) 16 vs. 17 AUTOZONE, INC.; 18 AUTOZONE WEST LLC f/k/a AUTOZONE WEST, INC. (sued 19 individually and as successor-in-interest to CHIEF AUTO PARTS); 20 AVON PRODUCTS, INC.; 21 BARRETTS MINERALS INC.; BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, 22 INC. (sued individually and as successor- in-interest to MINERAL PIGMENT 23 SOLUTIONS, INC. and as successor-in- 24 interest to WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS, INC.); 25 BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC. f/k/a MINERAL PIGMENT 26 SOLUTIONS, INC. (sued individually 27 and as successor-in-interest to WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS, 28 INC.); C' COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY - ASBESTOS 1 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (sued individually and as 2 successor-in-interest to CHARLES OF 3 THE RITZ); CHANEL, INC.; 4 CHARLES B.
    [Show full text]
  • <All City of Gilroy Commercial and Apartment Business Licenses>
    <All City of Gilroy Commercial and Apartment Business Licenses> Date: 3/6/2017 Bus# Business Name Owner Name Phone# Number Address Line 1 City St Zip Code Business Products Date Est NAICS SIC 5276 ST MARY CATHOLIC PARISH ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN(408)847-5151 J 11 1ST ST GILROY CA 95020-5128 CHURCH 01/23/04 813110 8661 13726 THE WAX STUDIO ZUNIGA, MARYLOU (408) 612-5185 66 1ST ST STE 2 GILROY CA 95020-5140 WAX & ESTHETICS SERVICES01/08/15 33999 3999 12302 THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE VASQUEZ, PIERRETTE (408) 607-3180 66 1ST ST STE 3 GILROY CA 95020 MASSAGE THERAPY05/16/13 13295 VERITAS POLYGRAPH EXAMINATIONS GONZALEZ, MICHELLE A. (408) 767-8515 66 1ST ST STE 5 GILROY CA 95020-5140 POLYGRAPH 06/09/14 561611 7381 13135 CALIMEX AUTO INSURANCE SERVICES ROCHA, ALEX (408) 469-9832 66 1ST ST STE 7 GILROY CA 95020-5140 INSURANCE AUTO SALES/NOTARY04/01/14 524210 6411 13546 INFORMED CHOICES INFORMED CHOICES (408) 847-8880 66 1ST ST STE A GILROY CA 95020-5140 PREGNANCY RESOURCE10/08/14 CENTER 10859 SOUTH VALLEY BUSINESS SERVICES MATTEUCCI, CARLA (408) 887-0905 66 1ST ST STE B GILROY CA 95020-5140 TAXES & NOTARY SERVICES07/01/11 541213 7291 1010 EDNA M. DOWELL L M F C HOLCOME, EDNA M (408)847-2120 66 1ST ST STE C GILROY CA 95020-5140 FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICES11/03/94 621330 8049 10853 BANISTER CERTIFIED HAND THERAPY INCBANISTER CERTIFIED HAND THERAPY(408) 712-4669INC 190 1ST ST GILROY CA 95020 PHYSICAL THERAPY/HAND08/01/11 621340 8049 1405 CARAVELLE WORLD TRAVEL PINHEIRO, AL (408)842-0200 190 1ST ST GILROY CA 95020-5129 TRAVEL AGENCY 03/19/91 561510 4724 6247 GURRIES ENTERPRISES RONALD J.
    [Show full text]