DOCSLIB.ORG

Algebraic Geometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Algebraic Geometry J.S. Milne Version 6.01 August 23, 2015 These notes are an introduction to the theory of algebraic varieties emphasizing the simi- larities to the theory of manifolds. In contrast to most such accounts they study abstract algebraic varieties, and not just subvarieties of affine and projective space. This approach leads more naturally into scheme theory. BibTeX information @misc{milneAG, author={Milne, James S.}, title={Algebraic Geometry (v6.01)}, year={2015}, note={Available at www.jmilne.org/math/}, pages={226} } v2.01 (August 24, 1996). First version on the web. v3.01 (June 13, 1998). v4.00 (October 30, 2003). Fixed errors; many minor revisions; added exercises; added two sections/chapters; 206 pages. v5.00 (February 20, 2005). Heavily revised; most numbering changed; 227 pages. v5.10 (March 19, 2008). Minor fixes; TEXstyle changed, so page numbers changed; 241 pages. v5.20 (September 14, 2009). Minor corrections; revised Chapters 1, 11, 16; 245 pages. v5.22 (January 13, 2012). Minor fixes; 260 pages. v6.00 (August 24, 2014). Major revision; 223 pages. v6.01 (August 23, 2015). Minor fixes; 226 pages. Available at www.jmilne.org/math/ Please send comments and corrections to me at the address on my web page. The curves are a tacnode, a ramphoid cusp, and an ordinary triple point. Copyright c 1996, 1998, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 J.S. Milne. Single paper copies for noncommercial personal use may be made without explicit permission from the copyright holder. Contents Contents3 1 Preliminaries from commutative algebra 11 a. Rings and ideals, 11 ; b. Rings of fractions, 16 ; c. Unique factorization, 21 ; d. Integral dependence, 24; e. Tensor Products, 30 ; f. Transcendence bases, 33. 2 Algebraic Sets 35 a. Definition of an algebraic set, 35 ; b. The Hilbert basis theorem, 36; c. The Zariski topology, 37; d. The Hilbert Nullstellensatz, 38; e. The correspondence between algebraic sets and radical ideals, 39 ; f. Finding the radical of an ideal, 43; g. Properties of the Zariski topology, 43; h. Decomposition of an algebraic set into irreducible algebraic sets, 44 ; i. Regular functions; the coordinate ring of an algebraic set, 47; j. Regular maps, 48; k. Hypersurfaces; finite and quasi-finite maps, 48; l. Noether normalization theorem, 50 ; m. Dimension, 52 . 3 Affine Algebraic Varieties 59 a. Sheaves, 59 ; b. Ringed spaces, 60; c. The ringed space structure on an algebraic set, 61 ; d. Morphisms of ringed spaces, 64 ; e. Affine algebraic varieties, 65; f. The category of affine algebraic varieties, 66; g. Explicit description of morphisms of affine varieties, 67 ; h. Subvarieties, 70; i. Properties of the regular map Spm.˛/, 71; j. Affine space without coordinates, 72; k. Birational equivalence, 73; l. Noether Normalization Theorem, 75; m. Dimension, 75 . 4 Local Study 81 a. Tangent spaces to plane curves, 81 ; b. Tangent cones to plane curves, 83 ; c. The local m ring at a point on a curve, 85; d. Tangent spaces to algebraic subsets of A , 86 ; e. The differential of a regular map, 88; f. Tangent spaces to affine algebraic varieties, 89 ; g. Tangent cones, 93; h. Nonsingular points; the singular locus, 94 ; i. Nonsingularity and regularity, 96; j. Examples of tangent spaces, 97. 5 Algebraic Varieties 99 a. Algebraic prevarieties, 99; b. Regular maps, 100; c. Algebraic varieties, 101; d. Maps from varieties to affine varieties, 103; e. Subvarieties, 103 ; f. Prevarieties obtained by patching, 104; g. Products of varieties, 105 ; h. The separation axiom revisited, 110; i. Fibred products, 112 ; j. Dimension, 113; k. Dominant maps, 115; l. Rational maps; birational equivalence, 115; m. Local study, 116; n. Etale´ maps, 117 ; o. Etale´ neighbourhoods, 120 ; p. Smooth maps, 122 ; q. Algebraic varieties as a functors, 123 ; r. Rational and unirational varieties, 126 . 6 Projective Varieties 129 n n a. Algebraic subsets of P , 129; b. The Zariski topology on P , 133; c. Closed subsets of 3 n n n A and P , 134 ; d. The hyperplane at infinity, 135; e. P is an algebraic variety, 135; f. The homogeneous coordinate ring of a projective variety, 137; g. Regular functions on a projective variety, 138; h. Maps from projective varieties, 139; i. Some classical maps of projective varieties, 141 ; j. Maps to projective space, 146; k. Projective space without coordinates, 146; l. The functor defined by projective space, 146; m. Grassmann varieties, 147 ; n. Bezout’s theorem, 150; o. Hilbert polynomials (sketch), 151; p. Dimensions, 153; q. Products, 154 . 7 Complete Varieties 157 a. Definition and basic properties, 157 ; b. Proper maps, 159; c. Projective varieties are complete, 160 ; d. Elimination theory, 161 ; e. The rigidity theorem; abelian varieties, 165; f. Chow’s Lemma, 167 ; g. Analytic spaces; Chow’s theorem, 169; h. Nagata’s Embedding Theorem, 170 . 8 Normal Varieties; (Quasi-)finite maps; Zariski’s Main Theorem 173 a. Normal varieties, 173 ; b. Regular functions on normal varieties, 177 ; c. Finite and quasi-finite maps, 179 ; d. The fibres of finite maps, 184; e. Zariski’s main theorem, 186 ; f. Stein factorization, 191; g. Blow-ups, 192 ; h. Resolution of singularities, 192 . 9 Regular Maps and Their Fibres 195 a. The constructibility theorem, 195; b. The fibres of morphisms, 198; c. Flat maps and their fibres, 201 ; d. Lines on surfaces, 208; e. Bertini’s theorem, 213; f. Birational classification, 214. Index 223 4 Notations We use the standard (Bourbaki) notations: N 0;1;2;::: , Z ring of integers, R field D f g D D of real numbers, C field of complex numbers, Fp Z=pZ field of p elements, p a D D D prime number. Given an equivalence relation, Œ denotes the equivalence class containing . A family of elements of a set A indexed by a second set I , denoted .ai /i I , is a function 2 i ai I A. We sometimes write S for the number of elements in a finite set S. 7! W ! j j Throughout, k is an algebraically closed field. Unadorned tensor products are over k. For a k-algebra R and k-module M , we often write MR for R M . The dual Hom .E;k/ ˝ k-linear of a finite-dimensional k-vector space E is denoted by E_. All rings will be commutative with 1, and homomorphisms of rings are required to map 1 to 1. We use Gothic (fraktur) letters for ideals: abcmnpqABCMNPQ abcmnpqABCMNPQ Finally X def YX is defined to be Y , or equals Y by definition; D X YX is a subset of Y (not necessarily proper, i.e., X may equal Y ); X YX and Y are isomorphic; X YX and Y are canonically isomorphic (or there is a given or unique isomorphism). ' A reference “Section 3m” is to Section m in Chapter 3; a reference “(3.45)” is to this item in chapter 3; a reference “(67)” is to (displayed) equation 67 (usually given with a page reference unless it is nearby). Prerequisites The reader is assumed to be familiar with the basic objects of algebra, namely, rings, modules, fields, and so on. References Atiyah and MacDonald 1969: Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley. CA: Milne, J.S., Commutative Algebra, v4.01, 2014. FT: Milne, J.S., Fields and Galois Theory, v4.50, 2014. Hartshorne 1977: Algebraic Geometry, Springer. Shafarevich 1994: Basic Algebraic Geometry, Springer. A reference monnnn (resp. sxnnnn) is to question nnnn on mathoverflow.net (resp. math.stackexchange.com). We sometimes refer to the computer algebra programs CoCoA (Computations in Commutative Algebra) http://cocoa.dima.unige.it/. Macaulay 2 (Grayson and Stillman) http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/. 5 Acknowledgements I thank the following for providing corrections and comments on earlier versions of these notes: Jorge Nicolas´ Caro Montoya, Sandeep Chellapilla, Rankeya Datta, Umesh V. Dubey, Shalom Feigelstock, Tony Feng, B.J. Franklin, Sergei Gelfand, Daniel Gerig, Darij Grinberg, Lucio Guerberoff, Isac Heden,´ Guido Helmers, Florian Herzig, Christian Hirsch, Cheuk-Man Hwang, Jasper Loy Jiabao, Dan Karliner, Lars Kindler, John Miller, Joaquin Rodrigues, Sean Rostami, David Rufino, Hossein Sabzrou, Jyoti Prakash Saha, Tom Savage, Nguyen Quoc Thang, Bhupendra Nath Tiwari, Israel Vainsencher, Soli Vishkautsan, Dennis Bouke Westra, Felipe Zaldivar, and others. QUESTION: If we try to explain to a layman what algebraic geometry is, it seems to me that the title of the old book of Enriques is still adequate: Geometrical Theory of Equations . GROTHENDIECK: Yes! but your “layman” should know what a system of algebraic equations is. This would cost years of study to Plato. QUESTION: It should be nice to have a little faith that after two thousand years every good high school graduate can understand what an affine scheme is . From the notes of a lecture series that Grothendieck gave at SUNY at Buffalo in the summer of 1973 (in 167 pages, Grothendieck manages to cover very little). 6 Introduction There is almost nothing left to discover in geometry. Descartes, March 26, 1619 Just as the starting point of linear algebra is the study of the solutions of systems of linear equations, n X aij Xj bi ; i 1;:::;m; (1) D D j 1 D the starting point for algebraic geometry is the study of the solutions of systems of polynomial equations, fi .X1;:::;Xn/ 0; i 1;:::;m; fi kŒX1;:::;Xn: D D 2 One immediate difference between linear equations and polynomial equations is that theo- rems for linear equations don’t depend on which field k you are working over,1 but those for polynomial equations depend on whether or not k is algebraically closed and (to a lesser extent) whether k has characteristic zero. A better description of algebraic geometry is that it is the study of polynomial functions and the spaces on which they are defined (algebraic varieties), just as topology is the study of continuous functions and the spaces on which they are defined (topological spaces), differential topology the study of infinitely differentiable functions and the spaces on which they are defined (differentiable manifolds), and so on: algebraic geometry regular (polynomial) functions algebraic varieties topology continuous functions topological spaces differential topology differentiable functions differentiable manifolds complex analysis analytic (power series) functions complex manifolds.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Affine Varieties

    1 Affine Varieties

    1 Affine Varieties We will begin following Kempf's Algebraic Varieties, and eventually will do things more like in Hartshorne. We will also use various sources for commutative algebra. What is algebraic geometry? Classically, it is the study of the zero sets of polynomials. We will now fix some notation. k will be some fixed algebraically closed field, any ring is commutative with identity, ring homomorphisms preserve identity, and a k-algebra is a ring R which contains k (i.e., we have a ring homomorphism ι : k ! R). P ⊆ R an ideal is prime iff R=P is an integral domain. Algebraic Sets n n We define affine n-space, A = k = f(a1; : : : ; an): ai 2 kg. n Any f = f(x1; : : : ; xn) 2 k[x1; : : : ; xn] defines a function f : A ! k : (a1; : : : ; an) 7! f(a1; : : : ; an). Exercise If f; g 2 k[x1; : : : ; xn] define the same function then f = g as polynomials. Definition 1.1 (Algebraic Sets). Let S ⊆ k[x1; : : : ; xn] be any subset. Then V (S) = fa 2 An : f(a) = 0 for all f 2 Sg. A subset of An is called algebraic if it is of this form. e.g., a point f(a1; : : : ; an)g = V (x1 − a1; : : : ; xn − an). Exercises 1. I = (S) is the ideal generated by S. Then V (S) = V (I). 2. I ⊆ J ) V (J) ⊆ V (I). P 3. V ([αIα) = V ( Iα) = \V (Iα). 4. V (I \ J) = V (I · J) = V (I) [ V (J). Definition 1.2 (Zariski Topology). We can define a topology on An by defining the closed subsets to be the algebraic subsets.
  • Fundamental Algebraic Geometry

    Fundamental Algebraic Geometry

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/123 hematical Surveys and onographs olume 123 Fundamental Algebraic Geometry Grothendieck's FGA Explained Barbara Fantechi Lothar Gottsche Luc lllusie Steven L. Kleiman Nitin Nitsure AngeloVistoli American Mathematical Society U^VDED^ EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Jerry L. Bona Peter S. Landweber Michael G. Eastwood Michael P. Loss J. T. Stafford, Chair 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14-01, 14C20, 13D10, 14D15, 14K30, 18F10, 18D30. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/surv-123 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Fundamental algebraic geometry : Grothendieck's FGA explained / Barbara Fantechi p. cm. — (Mathematical surveys and monographs, ISSN 0076-5376 ; v. 123) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8218-3541-6 (pbk. : acid-free paper) ISBN 0-8218-4245-5 (soft cover : acid-free paper) 1. Geometry, Algebraic. 2. Grothendieck groups. 3. Grothendieck categories. I Barbara, 1966- II. Mathematical surveys and monographs ; no. 123. QA564.F86 2005 516.3'5—dc22 2005053614 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for such permission should be addressed to the Acquisitions Department, American Mathematical Society, 201 Charles Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904-2294, USA.
  • Using Elimination to Describe Maxwell Curves Lucas P

    Using Elimination to Describe Maxwell Curves Lucas P

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2006 Using elimination to describe Maxwell curves Lucas P. Beverlin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Applied Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Beverlin, Lucas P., "Using elimination to describe Maxwell curves" (2006). LSU Master's Theses. 2879. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2879 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. USING ELIMINATION TO DESCRIBE MAXWELL CURVES A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial ful¯llment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Mathematics by Lucas Paul Beverlin B.S., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, 2002 August 2006 Acknowledgments This dissertation would not be possible without several contributions. I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. James Madden for his many suggestions and his patience. I would also like to thank my other committee members Dr. Robert Perlis and Dr. Stephen Shipman for their help. I would like to thank my committee in the Experimental Statistics department for their understanding while I completed this project. And ¯nally I would like to thank my family for giving me the chance to achieve a higher education.
  • Effective Noether Irreducibility Forms and Applications*

    Effective Noether Irreducibility Forms and Applications*

    Appears in Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 50/2 pp. 274{295 (1995). Effective Noether Irreducibility Forms and Applications* Erich Kaltofen Department of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York 12180-3590; Inter-Net: [email protected] Abstract. Using recent absolute irreducibility testing algorithms, we derive new irreducibility forms. These are integer polynomials in variables which are the generic coefficients of a multivariate polynomial of a given degree. A (multivariate) polynomial over a specific field is said to be absolutely irreducible if it is irreducible over the algebraic closure of its coefficient field. A specific polynomial of a certain degree is absolutely irreducible, if and only if all the corresponding irreducibility forms vanish when evaluated at the coefficients of the specific polynomial. Our forms have much smaller degrees and coefficients than the forms derived originally by Emmy Noether. We can also apply our estimates to derive more effective versions of irreducibility theorems by Ostrowski and Deuring, and of the Hilbert irreducibility theorem. We also give an effective estimate on the diameter of the neighborhood of an absolutely irreducible polynomial with respect to the coefficient space in which absolute irreducibility is preserved. Furthermore, we can apply the effective estimates to derive several factorization results in parallel computational complexity theory: we show how to compute arbitrary high precision approximations of the complex factors of a multivariate integral polynomial, and how to count the number of absolutely irreducible factors of a multivariate polynomial with coefficients in a rational function field, both in the complexity class . The factorization results also extend to the case where the coefficient field is a function field.
  • Notes on Grassmannians

    Notes on Grassmannians

    NOTES ON GRASSMANNIANS ANDERS SKOVSTED BUCH This is class notes under construction. We have not attempted to account for the history of the results covered here. 1. Construction of Grassmannians 1.1. The set of points. Let k = k be an algebraically closed field, and let kn be the vector space of column vectors with n coordinates. Given a non-negative integer m ≤ n, the Grassmann variety Gr(m, n) is defined as a set by Gr(m, n)= {Σ ⊂ kn | Σ is a vector subspace with dim(Σ) = m} . Our first goal is to show that Gr(m, n) has a structure of algebraic variety. 1.2. Space with functions. Let FR(n, m) = {A ∈ Mat(n × m) | rank(A) = m} be the set of all n × m matrices of full rank, and let π : FR(n, m) → Gr(m, n) be the map defined by π(A) = Span(A), the column span of A. We define a topology on Gr(m, n) be declaring the a subset U ⊂ Gr(m, n) is open if and only if π−1(U) is open in FR(n, m), and further declare that a function f : U → k is regular if and only if f ◦ π is a regular function on π−1(U). This gives Gr(m, n) the structure of a space with functions. ex:morphism Exercise 1.1. (1) The map π : FR(n, m) → Gr(m, n) is a morphism of spaces with functions. (2) Let X be a space with functions and φ : Gr(m, n) → X a map.
  • Generic Flatness for Strongly Noetherian Algebras

    Generic Flatness for Strongly Noetherian Algebras

    Journal of Algebra 221, 579–610 (1999) Article ID jabr.1999.7997, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Generic Flatness for Strongly Noetherian Algebras M. Artin* Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 View metadata, citation and similar papersE-mail: at core.ac.uk [email protected] brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector L. W. Small Department of Mathematics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093 E-mail: [email protected] and J. J. Zhang Department of Mathematics, Box 354350, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 E-mail: [email protected] Communicated by J. T. Stafford Received November 18, 1999 Key Words: closed set; critically dense; generically flat; graded ring; Nullstellen- satz; strongly noetherian; universally noetherian. © 1999 Academic Press CONTENTS 0. Introduction. 1. Blowing up a critically dense sequence. 2. A characterization of closed sets. 3. Generic flatness. 4. Strongly noetherian and universally noetherian algebras. 5. A partial converse. *All three authors were supported in part by the NSF and the third author was also supported by a Sloan Research Fellowship. 579 0021-8693/99 $30.00 Copyright © 1999 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 580 artin, small, and zhang 0. INTRODUCTION In general, A will denote a right noetherian associative algebra over a commutative noetherian ring R.LetR0 be a commutative R-algebra. If R0 is finitely generated over R, then a version of the Hilbert basis theorem 0 asserts that A ⊗R R is right noetherian. We call an algebra A strongly right 0 0 noetherian if A ⊗R R is right noetherian whenever R is noetherian.
  • Etienne Bézout on Elimination Theory Erwan Penchevre

    Etienne Bézout on Elimination Theory Erwan Penchevre

    Etienne Bézout on elimination theory Erwan Penchevre To cite this version: Erwan Penchevre. Etienne Bézout on elimination theory. 2017. hal-01654205 HAL Id: hal-01654205 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01654205 Preprint submitted on 3 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Etienne Bézout on elimination theory ∗ Erwan Penchèvre Bézout’s name is attached to his famous theorem. Bézout’s Theorem states that the degree of the eliminand of a system a n algebraic equations in n unknowns, when each of the equations is generic of its degree, is the product of the degrees of the equations. The eliminand is, in the terms of XIXth century algebra1, an equation of smallest degree resulting from the elimination of (n − 1) unknowns. Bézout demonstrates his theorem in 1779 in a treatise entitled Théorie générale des équations algébriques. In this text, he does not only demonstrate the theorem for n > 2 for generic equations, but he also builds a classification of equations that allows a better bound on the degree of the eliminand when the equations are not generic. This part of his work is difficult: it appears incomplete and has been seldom studied.
  • Simple Proof of the Main Theorem of Elimination Theory in Algebraic Geometry

    Simple Proof of the Main Theorem of Elimination Theory in Algebraic Geometry

    SIMPLE PROOF OF THE MAIN THEOREM OF ELIMINATION THEORY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY Autor(en): Cartier, P. / Tate, J. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: L'Enseignement Mathématique Band (Jahr): 24 (1978) Heft 1-2: L'ENSEIGNEMENT MATHÉMATIQUE PDF erstellt am: 10.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-49707 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch A SIMPLE PROOF OF THE MAIN THEOREM OF ELIMINATION THEORY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY by P. Cartier and J. Tate Summary The purpose of this note is to provide a simple proof (which we believe to be new) for the weak zero theorem in the case of homogeneous polynomials.
  • Utah/Fall 2020 3. Abstract Varieties. the Categories of Affine and Quasi

    Utah/Fall 2020 3. Abstract Varieties. the Categories of Affine and Quasi

    Algebraic Geometry I (Math 6130) Utah/Fall 2020 3. Abstract Varieties. The categories of affine and quasi-affine varieties over k are (by definition) full subcategories of the category of sheaved spaces (X; OX ) over k. We now enlarge the category just enough within the category of sheaved spaces to define a category of abstract varieties analogous to the categories of differentiable or analytic manifolds. Varieties are Noetherian and locally affine and separated (analogous to Hausdorff), the latter defined via products, which are also used to define the notion of a proper (analogous to compact or complete) variety. Definition 3.1. A topology on a set X is Noetherian if every descending chain: X ⊇ X1 ⊇ X2 ⊇ · · · of closed sets eventually stabilizes (or every ascending chain of open sets stabilizes). Remarks. (a) A Noetherian topological space X is quasi-compact, i.e. every open cover of X has a finite subcover, but a quasi-compact space need not be Noetherian. (b) The Zariski topology on a quasi-affine variety is Noetherian. (c) It is possible for a topological space X to fail to be Noetherian even if it has a cover by open sets, each of which is Noetherian with the induced topology. If the open cover is finite, however, then X is Noetherian. Definition 3.2. A Noetherian topological space X is reducible if X = X1 [ X2 for closed sets X1;X2 properly contained in X. Otherwise it is irreducible. Remarks. (a) As we saw in x1, every Noetherian topological space X is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets, accounting for the irreducible components of X.
  • Grothendieck Ring of Varieties

    Grothendieck Ring of Varieties

    Neeraja Sahasrabudhe Grothendieck Ring of Varieties Thesis advisor: J. Sebag Université Bordeaux 1 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Grothendieck Ring of Varieties 5 2.1. Classical denition 5 2.2. Classical properties 6 2.3. Bittner's denition 9 3. Stable Birational Geometry 14 4. Application 18 4.1. Grothendieck Ring is not a Domain 18 4.2. Grothendieck Ring of motives 19 5. APPENDIX : Tools for Birational geometry 20 Blowing Up 21 Resolution of Singularities 23 6. Glossary 26 References 30 1. Introduction First appeared in a letter of Grothendieck in Serre-Grothendieck cor- respondence (letter of 16/8/64), the Grothendieck ring of varieties is an interesting object lying at the heart of the theory of motivic inte- gration. A class of variety in this ring contains a lot of geometric information about the variety. For example, the topological euler characteristic, Hodge polynomials, Stably-birational properties, number of points if the variety is dened on a nite eld etc. Besides, the question of equality of these classes has given some important new results in bira- tional geometry (for example, Batyrev-Kontsevich's theorem). The Grothendieck Ring K0(V ark) is the quotient of the free abelian group generated by isomorphism classes of k-varieties, by the relation [XnY ] = [X]−[Y ], where Y is a closed subscheme of X; the ber prod- 0 0 uct over k induces a ring structure dened by [X]·[X ] = [(X ×k X )red]. Many geometric objects verify this kind of relations. It gives many re- alization maps, called additive invariants, containing some geometric information about the varieties.
  • Triangle Identities Via Elimination Theory

    Triangle Identities Via Elimination Theory

    Triangle Identities via Elimination Theory Dam Van Nhi and Luu Ba Thang Abstract The aim of this paper is to present some new identities via resultants and elimination theory, by presenting the sidelengths, the lengths of the altitudes and the exradii of a triangle as roots of cubic polynomials. 1 Introduction Finding identities between elements of a triangle represents a classical topic in elementary geometry. In Recent Advances in Geometric Inequalities [3], Mitrinovic et al presents the sidelengths, the lengths of the altitudes and the various radii as roots of cubic polynomials, and collects many interesting equalities and inequalities between these quantities. As far as we know, almost of them are built using only elementary algebra and geometry. In this paper, we use transformations of rational functions and resultants to build similar nice equalities and inequalities might be difficult to prove with different methods. 2 Main results To fix notations, suppose we are given a triangle ∆ABC with sidelengh a; b; c. Denote the radius of the circumcircle by R, the radius of incircle by r, the area of ∆ABC by S, the semiperimeter as p, the radii of the excircles as r1; r2; r3, and the altitudes from sides a; b and c, respectively, as ha; hb and hc. We have the results from [3, Chapter 1]. Theorem 1. [3] Using the above notations, (i) a; b; c are the roots of the cubic polynomial x3 − 2px2 + (p2 + r2 + 4Rr)x − 4Rrp: (1) (ii) ha; hb; hc are the roots of the cubic polynomial S2 + 4Rr3 + r4 2S2 2S2 x3 − x2 + x − : (2) 2Rr2 Rr R (iii) r1; r2; r3 are the roots of the cubic polynomial x3 − (4R + r)x2 + p2x − p2r: (3) Next, we present how to use transformations of rational functions to build new geometric equalities ax + b and inequalities.
  • Completeness in Partial Differential Fields

    Completeness in Partial Differential Fields

    Completeness in Partial Differential Fields James Freitag [email protected] Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science University of Illinois at Chicago 322 Science and Engineering Offices (M/C 249) 851 S. Morgan Street Chicago, IL 60607-7045 Abstract We study completeness in partial differential varieties. We generalize many of the results of Pong to the partial differential setting. In particular, we establish a valuative criterion for differential completeness and use it to give a new class of examples of complete partial differential varieties. In addition to completeness we prove some new embedding theorems for differential algebraic varieties. We use methods from both differential algebra and model theory. Completeness is a fundamental notion in algebraic geometry. In this paper, we examine an analogue in differential algebraic geometry. The paper builds on Pong’s [16] and Kolchin’s [7] work on differential completeness in the case of differential va- rieties over ordinary differential fields and generalizes to the case differential varieties over partial differential fields with finitely many commuting derivations. Many of the proofs generalize in the straightforward manner, given that one sets up the correct definitions and attempts to prove the correct analogues of Pong’s or Kolchin’s results. arXiv:1106.0703v2 [math.LO] 3 Feb 2012 Of course, some of the results are harder to prove because our varieties may be infinite differential transcendence degree. Nevertheless, Proposition 3.3 generalizes a theorem of [17] even when we restrict to the ordinary case. The proposition also generalizes a known result projective varieties. Many of the results are model-theoretic in nature or use model-theoretic tools.