Vestigial Structures in Pontoporeiid and Stegocephalid Amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridea) by Cedric D' UDEKEM D' ACOZ & J0rgen BERGE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vestigial Structures in Pontoporeiid and Stegocephalid Amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridea) by Cedric D' UDEKEM D' ACOZ & J0rgen BERGE BULLETIN DE L'INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE, BIOLOGIE, 73: 107 -11 3, 2003 BULLETIN VAN HET KONINKLIJK BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN, BIOLOGIE, 73: 107- 11 3,2003 Vestigial structures in pontoporeiid and stegocephalid amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridea) by Cedric d' UDEKEM d' ACOZ & J0rgen BERGE Abstract pereiopod in the genus Bathyporeia (Pontoporeiidae) and that of a rudimentary mandibular palp in stegocephalid Two kinds of previously overlooked ves ti gial structures in amphipods. Those structures, w hi ch have previously been amphipods are here described and illustrated by SEM overl ooked, are described here for the first time. photographi es. A rudimentary dactylu s, reduced to a tiny bud termi­ nated by a seta has been detected on th e second and the fifth pereiopod in Bathyporeia spp. (Pontoporeiidae), and a minute The dactylus of the second and fifth pereiopod in seti form stru cture representing the remn ant of th e mandibular palp Bathyporeia spp. (Pontoporeiidae) has been observed in most stegocephalid genera. Thei r evoluti onary significance is briefly di scussed. The very homogeneous genus Bathyporeia LiNDSTRO M, Key words : Bathyporeia, Pontoporeiidae, Stegocephalidae, 1855 includes about 20 species li ving in sandy intertidal and Eualus, Caridea, mandibular palp , dac tylus, vestigial, morphology. coastal bottoms in the A tl antic and the Mediterranean Sea (D' UDEKEM D' Acoz, submitted). Their antennae, pereiopods and uropods are deeply modified (G.O. SARS, 1891) in direct Resume relationship with their fossorial habits (NICOLAISEN & K ANNEWORFF, 1969). Previous authors such as e.g. G.O. Deux types de structures vestigiales presentes chez certains amphi­ SARS (1891) concluded that the dactylus was Jacking on the podes sont decrits ici pour Ia premi ere fo is, et illustres par des pho­ second and the fifth pere iopods, and indeed at first glance tographies en microscopie electronique a balayage. Un dactyle mi­ they seem to be absent. However, when studying the tax­ nu scul e et rudimentaire prolonge par un e so ie a ete detecte sur le onomy. of the northwestern European species under a high second et le cinquieme pereiopode de Bathyporeia spp. power light microscope, the first author had the surprise to (Pontoporeiidae). De meme, une tres petite stru cture .setiforme re­ detect minute structures between the apical propodal setae of presentant l'ultime vestige d' un palpe mandibulaire a ete observe chez Ia plupart des Stegocephalidae. Leur signification evolutive est the second and the fifth pereiopods, which are obviously ves­ brievement discutee. tigial dactyli. They were ob se ~;ved in all northwestern Euro­ pean Bathyporeia species: B. elegans W ATK IN , 1938; B. gra­ Mots des : Bathyporeia , Pontoporeiidae, Stegocephalidae, Eualus, cilis G.O. SARS, 189 1; B. guilliamsoniana (BATE, 1857); B. Caridea, palpe mandibulaire, dactyle, vesti gial, morphologie. nana TOULMOND, 1966; B. pelagica (BATE, 1856); B. pilosa LINDSTROM, 1855; B. sarsi W AT KI N, 1938 and B. tenuipes MEINERT, 1870, as well as in the northeastern American B. Introduction parkeri BOUSFIELD, 1973, and that dispositio n is presumably characteristic of the w hole genus. A closer examinatio n in As a conseque nce of evolutionary pressure, some append­ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that the rudi­ ages or structures may regress and finally disappear. Such mentary dactylus of the second pereiopod, w hich arises from regressive processes are usuall y gradual, and vestigial rem­ the ventral surface of the propodus, consists of a discoid tiny nants of these structures often persist fo r very lo ng periods bud fused to the propodus. erminated in a longer, strongly before their complete di sappearance. During our respective setulose seta (Fig. 1). Despite its very small size, the fifth studies on pontoporeiid and stegocephalid amphipods, both d actylus appears to be in a less advanced stage of morpho­ authors independently discovered two kinds of vesti gial logical regression. 1t consists of a minute cylinder, distinctly structures, which are here presented in a j o int paper: the oc­ articulated w ith the anteroventral part of the propodus and currence of a rudimentary dactylu s on the second and fifth terminated in a scarcely setulose seta (Fig. 2). I I 108 CEDRIC D' UDEKEM D' ACOZ & J0RGEN BERGE Fig. I. Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana (BATE, 1857), male, the Netherlands, second pereiopod. A, carpus and propodus; B, D, tip of propodus +vestigial dactylus; C, vesti gial dactylus. On fig. D , the apical seta of the vestigial dactylus has been rubbed off during the removal of the propodal marginal setae. · In related genera like Pontoporeia and Amphiporeia, the dac­ Bathyporeia (P2 and .PS modified, both with very reduced tylus of the second pereiopod, although not always large, re­ dactyli). mains well developed and fonns a subchela with the propodus (e.g. G .O. SARS, 189 1; SHOEMAKER, 1933; BOUSFIELD , 1973; GLENNON, 1979). In contrast, Bathy­ The stegocephalid mandible and its vestigial palp poreia possesses an elongate and deeply modified propodus with a vesti gial bud-like dactylus. So far, all authors dealing with either the morphology and/or the taxonomy of the amphipod family Stegocephalidae As concerns the fifth pereiopod, its general shape remains D ANA, 1852 have concluded that the mandible of the family basal in Pontoporeia, whilst in Amphiporeia it is hjghly is always devoid both of palp and molar process; see espe­ m odified, with a blade-like merus, and morphologically very cially BERGE & V DER (200 1) in their recent revision of the close to that of Bathyporeia. However both in Pontoporeia family. However, a careful examination of representatives of and An;phiporeia, the dactylus of the fifth pereiopod, albeit all five subfamilies of the Stegocephalidae: Andaniexinae, small , remains conspicuous and is much bigger than in Andaniopsinae, Bathystegocephalinae, Parandaniinae and Barhyporeia. So, if the second and the fifth pereiopod are Stegocephalinae in SEM has revealed the existence of a tiny, considered alone, there is apparentl y a kind of evolutionary more or less setifom1 structure at the exact position where a gradation : Pontoporeia (P2 and PS basal)> Amphiporeia (P2 palp does occur in other amphipod families. That structure is basal; PS modified but with conspicuous dactylus) > herein interpreted as a rudimentary palp. '' Vestigial structures in amphipods 109 Fi g. 2. Bat hyporeia gu illiamsoniana (BATE, I 857), male, the Netherl and s, fift h pereiopod. A, meru s to ti p; 8 , propodus + scarcely di stinct dactylus; C, tip of propodus + ves ti gial dactylu s. I I 110 CEDRIC D'UDEKEM D' ACOZ & J0RGEN BERGE Fi g. 3. A, 8 : Stegonomadia biofar (BERGE & V ADER, 1997), Iceland; C, 0 : Parandania gigantea (STEBB ING, 1888), Southern Ocean, E, F: Bathystegocephalus globosus W ALKE R, 1909, Indian Ocea n. A, C, E, mandible and oral field; 8 , D, F, vestigial mandibular palp. Vestigial structures in amphipods 111 Fig. 4. A, B: Andaniopsis nordlmzdica (BOECK, 187 1), Northern No rway; C, 0 : Andaniotes linearis K .H. BARNARD, 1930, Southern Ocean; E: Eualus occultus (LEBOUR, 1936), female, NW France, lie Callot; F: Eualus cranchii (LEACH, 18 17), female, Belgium, Zeebrugge. A, C, mandible and oral field; B, D, vestigial mandibular palp; E, F, left mandible (respectively with and without palp). II 112 CEDRIC D'UDEKEM D' ACOZ & J0RGEN BERGE Andaniexinae Stegonomadia biofar (Fig. 3 A-B). However, within the clade consisting of the four genera Austrophippsia, Phippsia, Schellenbergia and Tetradeion, it seems that most species in fact do not possess any palp, but that it has been retained in Andaniopsinae some Tetradion species. Thus, it seems that within the three most basal stegocephalid subfamilies (Fig. 5), a rudimentary palp is present in all spe­ cies (at least, al l species examined hitherto have been ·con­ firmed to possess a palp), whereas the homologous feature is - Stegocephalinae not present in all species of the two more derived subfamilies (Andaniopsinae and Stegocephalinae, see Fig. 5). Bathystegocephalinae Discussion and conclusion Parandaniinae Interestingly, both in the case of the vestigial dactyli and in that of the mandibular palp, a hair-like element is present. Indeed the dactyli of spp. consist of a bud-like Fi g. 5. Phylogeneti c relationships among the subfamilies of Bathyporeia Stegocephalidae as hypothesised by BERGE & VADER structure terminated by a proportionately large seta, and the (200 1) . stegocephalid palp as a whole is setifonn. M aybe, the stegocephalid condition is a more advanced stage or regres­ sion. This is supported by the fact that the vestigial condition is the rule in the family, whilst various character states are Its distribution across all five subfamilies clearly indicates found amongst Pontoporeiidae. this being a plesiomorphic character state. Indeed, all mem­ bers of the two most plesiomorphic subfamilies (Bathystego­ Although, in the cases described above, the regression ap­ cephalinae and Parandaniinae, see Fig. 5), which together pears to be a gradual process, with a long-persisting vestige, consist of merely 4 species (Bathystegocephalus globosus there are probably exceptions to that rule in crustaceans. Re­ W ALKER, 1909, Parandania boecki (STEBBI NG , 1888), P cently, we have examined the mandible of the caridean gigantea (STEBB ING, 1888) and P ·nonhiata ANDRES, 1985), shrimp Eualus cranchii (LEACH, 1817) which was also sup­ possess a rudimentary palp (Fig. 3 C-F), as do all examined posed to be devoid of a mandibular palp . Scanning electron species of the subfamily Andaniexinae (Andaniexis lupus microscopy examination confinned that it was completely BERGE & VADER , 1997, Andaniotes linearis K.H BARNARD, absent as previously stated, without any vestigial remnant 1930, A. pseudolinearis BERGE, 2001 , Glorandaniotes eilae (Fig. 4 F). Very closely related species such as Eualus BERGE & VADER , 1997, Mediterexis mimonectes (RUFFO, occultus (LEBOUR, 1936) exhibit a well-developed palp (Fig. 1975), and Stegosoladidus simplex (K.H.
Recommended publications
  • Benthic Amphipod (Crustacea) Fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and Some Environmental Factors Affecting Their Distribution
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER AADRAY 56(2): 171 - 188, 2015 Benthic amphipod (Crustacea) fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and some environmental factors affecting their distribution Ayşegül MÜLAYİM*1, Hüsamettin BALKIS1 and Murat SEZGİN2 1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 34134 Istanbul,Turkey 2Sinop University, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Hydrobiology 57000 Sinop, Turkey *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] This study aims to determine the environmental factors affecting the fauna and distribution of benthic amphipod species inhabiting in the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs which are located on the south of the Marmara Sea. Total of 66 species belonging to 22 families were identified after analyzing the samples collected seasonally from the depths ranging between 1 and 30 m between 2007- 2008. According to the data gathered from the literature, it was determined that one species (Bathyporeia elegans Watkin, 1938) was a new record for the Turkish seas and 37 species for the Marmara Sea. In the Bandırma Gulf, of the ecological variables of the environment temperature was determined to range between 6.6-27°C, salinity between 21.32-36.03 psu, dissolved oxygen between 4.04-11.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.00-8.38. In the Erdek Gulf, temperature ranged between 6.7 and 27°C, salinity between 21.93-35.54‰, dissolved oxygen between 3.67-13.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.06-8.36. In the surface sediment at the sampling stations of the Bandırma Gulf, total organic carbon values were between 0.07-4.42%, total calcium carbonate between 0.88-84.82%, total phosphorus between 609-12740 μg g-1 and mud percentage between 1.38-79.93%.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to and Revisions of the Amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) Fauna of South Africa, with a List of Currently Known Species from the Region
    Additions to and revisions of the amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) fauna of South Africa, with a list of currently known species from the region Rebecca Milne Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa & Charles L. Griffiths* Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa E-mail: [email protected] (with 13 figures) Received 25 June 2013. Accepted 23 August 2013 Three species of marine Amphipoda, Peramphithoe africana, Varohios serratus and Ceradocus isimangaliso, are described as new to science and an additional 13 species are recorded from South Africa for the first time. Twelve of these new records originate from collecting expeditions to Sodwana Bay in northern KwaZulu-Natal, while one is an introduced species newly recorded from Simon’s Town Harbour. In addition, we collate all additions and revisions to the regional amphipod fauna that have taken place since the last major monographs of each group and produce a comprehensive, updated faunal list for the region. A total of 483 amphipod species are currently recognized from continental South Africa and its Exclusive Economic Zone . Of these, 35 are restricted to freshwater habitats, seven are terrestrial forms, and the remainder either marine or estuarine. The fauna includes 117 members of the suborder Corophiidea, 260 of the suborder Gammaridea, 105 of the suborder Hyperiidea and a single described representative of the suborder Ingolfiellidea.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Marine Benthic Metabarcoding
    University of Groningen Marine benthic metabarcoding Klunder, Lise Margriet DOI: 10.33612/diss.135301602 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Klunder, L. M. (2020). Marine benthic metabarcoding: Anthropogenic effects on benthic diversity from shore to deep sea; assessed by metabarcoding and traditional taxonomy. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.135301602 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-12-2020 CHAPTER 2 Diversity of Wadden Sea macrofauna and meiofauna communities highest in DNA from extractions preceded by cell lysis Lise Klunder Gerard C.A. Duineveld Marc S.S. Lavaleye Henk W. van der Veer Per J. Palsbøll Judith D.L. van Bleijswijk Manuscript published in Journal of Sea Research 152 (2019) Chapter 2 ABSTRACT Metabarcoding of genetic material in environmental samples has increasingly been employed as a means to assess biodiversity, also of marine benthic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme
    The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme Macrobenthic Exercise Results – MB19 Jessica Taylor & David Hall [email protected] June 2012 Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. 7 Diamond Centre Works Road Letchworth Hertfordshire SG6 1LW www.unicomarine.com EXERCISE DETAILS Macrobenthos #19 Type/Contents – Natural marine sample from southern North Sea; approx. 0.5 litres of shell debris; 1 mm sieve mesh processing. Circulated – 05/09/2011 Completion Date – 02/12/2011 Number of Participating Laboratories – 9 Number of Results Received – 7 ______________________________________________________________________________ Contents Results Sheets 1 - 7. NMBAQC Scheme Interim Results – Macrobenthic exercise (MB19). Tables Table 1. Results from the analysis of Macrobenthic sample MB19 by the participating laboratories. Table 2. Comparison of the efficiency of extraction of fauna by the participating laboratories for the major taxonomic groups present in sample MB19. Table 3. Comparison of the estimates of biomass made by the participating laboratories with those made by Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. for the major taxonomic groups present in sample MB19. Table 5. Variation in faunal content reported for the artificial replicate samples distributed as MB19. Figures Figure 1. MB19 data from participating laboratories (raw - untransformed). Cluster dendrogram showing plotted data from participating laboratories as supplied. Figure 2. MB19 data reanalysed by Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. Cluster dendrogram showing plotted data from participating laboratories following reanalysis by Thomson Unicomarine Ltd. (untransformed). All residues and fauna have been reanalysed. No data truncation – all faunal groups included. Appendices Appendix 1 MB19 Instructions for participation. NMBAQC Scheme Interim Results LabCode LB1802 Summary Data SampleCode MB19 Diff. In No. Taxa -6 Sample Received 16/01/2012 Diff.
    [Show full text]
  • (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the Lower Chesapeake Estuaries
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1971 The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries James Feely Virginia Institute of Marine Science Marvin L. Wass Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Feely, J., & Wass, M. L. (1971) The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries. Special papers in marine science No.2. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. http://doi.org/10.21220/V5H01D This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 VIRGIN IA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SC IE NCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1971 THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER 1 CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 1971 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 This document is in part a thesis by James B. Feeley presented to the School of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary in Virginia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonization of Novel Algal Habitats by Juveniles of a Marine Tube-Dwelling Amphipod
    Colonization of novel algal habitats by juveniles of a marine tube-dwelling amphipod Marilia Bueno1, Glauco B.O. Machado1,2 and Fosca P.P. Leite1 1 Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 2 Instituto de Biociências, Campus do Litoral Paulista, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil ABSTRACT Background: Dispersal is an important process affecting population dynamics and connectivity. For marine direct developers, both adults and juveniles may disperse. Although the distribution of juveniles can be initially constrained by their mothers’ choice, they may be able to leave the parental habitat and colonize other habitats. We investigated the effect of habitat quality, patch size and presence of conspecific adults on the colonization of novel habitats by juveniles of the tube-dwelling amphipod Cymadusa filosa associated with the macroalgal host Sargassum filipendula. Methods: We tested the factors listed above on the colonization of juveniles by manipulating natural and artificial plants in both the field and laboratory. Results: In the laboratory, juveniles selected high-quality habitats (i.e., natural alga), where both food and shelter are provided, when low-quality resources (i.e., artificial alga) were also available. In contrast, habitat quality and algal patch size did not affect the colonization by juveniles in the field. Finally, the presence of conspecific adults did not affect the colonization of juveniles under laboratory condition but had a weak effect in the field experiment. Our results suggest that C. filosa juveniles can select and colonize novel habitats, and that such process can be partially affected by habitat Submitted 6 August 2020 quality, but not by patch size.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda Key to Amphipoda Gammaridea
    GRBQ188-2777G-CH27[411-693].qxd 5/3/07 05:38 PM Page 545 Techbooks (PPG Quark) Dojiri, M., and J. Sieg, 1997. The Tanaidacea, pp. 181–278. In: J. A. Blake stranded medusae or salps. The Gammaridea (scuds, land- and P. H. Scott, Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa hoppers, and beachhoppers) (plate 254E) are the most abun- Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel. 11. The Crustacea. dant and familiar amphipods. They occur in pelagic and Part 2 The Isopoda, Cumacea and Tanaidacea. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California. benthic habitats of fresh, brackish, and marine waters, the Hatch, M. H. 1947. The Chelifera and Isopoda of Washington and supralittoral fringe of the seashore, and in a few damp terres- adjacent regions. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 10: 155–274. trial habitats and are difficult to overlook. The wormlike, 2- Holdich, D. M., and J. A. Jones. 1983. Tanaids: keys and notes for the mm-long interstitial Ingofiellidea (plate 254D) has not been identification of the species. New York: Cambridge University Press. reported from the eastern Pacific, but they may slip through Howard, A. D. 1952. Molluscan shells occupied by tanaids. Nautilus 65: 74–75. standard sieves and their interstitial habitats are poorly sam- Lang, K. 1950. The genus Pancolus Richardson and some remarks on pled. Paratanais euelpis Barnard (Tanaidacea). Arkiv. for Zool. 1: 357–360. Lang, K. 1956. Neotanaidae nov. fam., with some remarks on the phy- logeny of the Tanaidacea. Arkiv. for Zool. 9: 469–475. Key to Amphipoda Lang, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Abra prismatica, Bathyporeia elegans and polychaetes in circalittoral fine sand MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Marine Evidence–based Sensitivity Assessment (MarESA) Review Dr Heidi Tillin 2016-07-01 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/habitats/detail/1133]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Tillin, H.M. 2016. [Abra prismatica], [Bathyporeia elegans] and polychaetes in circalittoral fine sand. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinhab.1133.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Date:
    [Show full text]
  • A REVISION of the AMPHIPOD GENUS BATHYPOREIA LINDSTROM by E
    211 A REVISION OF THE AMPHIPOD GENUS BATHYPOREIA LINDSTROM By E. Emrys Watkin, B.Sc., Ph.D. Lecturer in Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth (Text-figs. 1-6) CONTENTS PAGE History of the Genus 2II Notes on the Structural Characters of the Genus. 214 Description of the Species 216 B. guilliamsoniana (Bate) 216 B. pelagica (Bate) 219 B. elegans, nom.nov. 222 B. tenuipes Meinert 225 B. gracilis Sars . 227 B. pilosa Lindstrom. 228 B. sarsi, nom.nov. 231 B. lindstromi Stebbing 234 Key to the Identification of the Species 234 Acknowledgements 235 References 235 HISTORY OF THE GENUS The genus Bathyporeia was established by Lindstrom (1855, p. 59) on speci- mens collected in the Baltic at Wisby and Landskrona. His description is based, apart from a reference to the epimera as small and beset with hairs, on the form of the appendages. He assigned to the genus one species, pilosa, in which the segments of the body are described as smooth, the form generally rounded, the eyes black, small and somewhat reniform, and the length under three lines. He gives a detailed description and drawing of the appendages. From the description of the antennae and of the eyes it may be assumed that the specimens were females. Spence Bate in 1856 (p. 59), and again in 1857a (p. 146), unaware of Lindstrom's paper, described a new genus, Thersites, as follows: "The upper antennae with the second joint of the peduncle produced from the inferior side of the first. Second gnathopod terminating in a bush. Telson double." He assigned to the genus two species, namely, guilliamsoniana with "the inferior antenna as long again as the superior" and pelagica with" the inferior antenna six times as long as the superior".
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda: Gammaridea) Del Atlántico Occidental Tropical
    NOTA Esta es la versión completa del artículo. La versión publicada en nuestra edición impresa está abreviada. Lista y referencias de los crustáceos anfípodos (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) del Atlántico occidental tropical Manuel Ortíz1, Alberto Martín2 & Yusbelly J. Díaz2 1 Centro de Investigaciones Marinas, Universidad de La Habana, Calle 16 Nº114 e/1ra y 3ra Miramar Playa, Habana, Cuba; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio y Colección de Crustáceos Peracáridos, Departamento de Estudios Ambientales e INTECMAR, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apartado Postal 89000, Sartenejas-Baruta, Venezuela; [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 09-V-2001. Corregido 25-I-2007. Aceptado 28-II-2007. Abstract: Checklist and references of the Amphipod Crustaceans (Gammaridea) from tropical western Atlantic. The published records of Amphipoda Gammaridea of the tropical western Atlantic region were reviewed and compiled in a checklist. A total of 478 species is recorded (52 families, 199 genera). This adds 20 families and 253 species to the last published list. The families are Ampeliscidae, Amphilochidae, Amphitoidae, Anamixidae, Aoridae, Argissidae, Aristiidae, Bateidae, Biancolinidae, Bogidiellidae, Cheluridae, Colomastigidae, Corophiidae, Cyphocarididae, Cyproideidae, Dexaminidae, Endevouridae, Epimeriidae, Eusiridae, Gammaridae, Hadziidae, Haustoriidae, Hyalellidae, Hyalidae, Hyperiopsidae, Iphimediidae, Isaeidae, Ischyroceridae, Leucothoidae, Liljeborgiidae, Lysianassidae, Megaluropidae, Melitidae, Melphidippidae, Ochlesidae, Oedicerotidae, Pardaliscidae, Phliantidae,
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]