DOCSLIB.ORG

The Dancing Wu Li Masters an Overview of the New Physics Gary Zukav

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Dancing Wu Li Masters an Overview of the New Physics Gary Zukav The Dancing Wu Li Masters An Overview of the New Physics Gary Zukav A BANTAM NEW AGE BOOK BANTAM BOOKS NEW YORK • TORONTO • LONDON • SYDNEY • AUCKLAND This book is dedicated to you, who are drawn to read it. Acknowledgments My gratitude to the following people cannot be adequately expressed. I discovered, in the course of writing this book, that physicists, from graduate students to Nobel Laureates, are a gracious group of people; accessible, helpful, and engaging. This discovery shattered my long-held stereo- type of the cold, "objective" scientific personality. For this, above all, I am grateful to the people listed here. Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D., Director of the Physics/Consciousness Research Group, is the catalyst without whom the following people and I would not have met. Al Chung-liang Huang, The T'ai Chi Master, provided the perfect metaphor of Wu Li, inspiration, and the beautiful calligraphy. David Finkelstein, Ph.D., Director of the School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, was my first tutor. These men are the godfathers of this book. In addition to Sarfatti and Finkelstein, Brian Josephson, Professor of Physics, Cambridge University, and Max Jammer, Professor of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat- Gan, Israel, read and commented upon the entire manu- script. I am especially indebted to these men (but I do not wish to imply that any one of them, or any other of the individualistic and creative thinkers who helped me with this book, would approve of it, page for page, as it is written, nor that the responsibility for any errors or mis- interpretations belongs to anyone but me). I am also indebted to Henry Stapp, Ph.D., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, for reading and commenting upon ix x / ACKNOWLEDGMENTS portions of the manuscript, and to Elizabeth Rauscher, Ph.D., founder and sponsor of the Fundamental Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, for encouraging non-physicists to partake of weekly conferences which normally would attract only physicists. In addition to Stapp and Sarfatti, this group included John Clauser, Ph.D.; Philippe Eberhard, Ph.D.; George Weissman, Ph.D.; Fred Wolf, Ph.D,; and Fritjof Capra, Ph.D,; among others. I am grateful to Carson Jefferies, Professor of Physics, University of California at Berkeley, for his support and for commenting upon portions of the manuscript; to David Bohm, Professor of Physics, Birkbeck College, University of London, for reading portions of the manuscript; to Saul-Paul Sirag for his frequent assistance; to the physi- cists of the Particle Data Group, Lawrence Berkeley Labo- ratory, for their assistance in compiling the particle table at the back of the book; to Eleanor Criswell, Professor of Psychology, Sonoma State University (California), for her valuable support; to Gin McCollum, Professor of Mathe- matics, Kansas State University, for her assistance and for her patient tutelage; and to Nick Herbert, Ph.D., Director of the C-Life Institute, for providing me with his excellent papers on Bell's theorem and for permission to use his paper title, "More than Both," as a chapter title. All of the illustrations in this book were done by Thomas Linden Robinson. Harvey White, Professor Emeritus, Department of Phys- ics, University of California at Berkeley, and former Di- rector, Lawrence Hall of Science, personally provided photographs of his famous simulations of probability dis- tribution patterns. The electron diffraction photograph was provided by Ronald Gronsky, Ph.D., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. I learned much about spectroscopy from Sumner Davis, Professor of Physics, University of California at Berkeley. I am deeply grateful to these men who, like all of the physicists that I encountered in writing this book, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS / xi gave graciously of their time and knowledge to a stranger who needed help. I also am indebted to Maria Guarnaschelli, my editor, for her sensitivity and erudition. Without the generosity of Michael Murphy and the Board of Directors of the Esalen Institute, which sponsored the 1976 conference on physics and consciousness, none of this probably would have happened. Table of Contents Synoptic Table of Contents xv Cast of Characters xix Foreword by David Finkelstein xxiii Introduction xxvii WU LI? Big Week at Big Sur 3 Einstein Doesn't Like It 18 PATTERNS OF ORGANIC ENERGY Living? 45 What Happens 67 MY WAY The Role of "I" 91 NONSENSE Beginner's Mind 117 Special Nonsense 134 General Nonsense 160 xiii xiv / TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CLUTCH MY IDEAS The Particle Zoo 191 The Dance 212 ENLIGHTENMENT More Than Both 255 The End of Science 281 Notes 315 Bibliography 323 Index 329 Particle Table 340 Synoptic Table of Contents WU LI? (Introduction) Big Week at Big Sur Physics (3), Esalen (4), Chinese and English (5), Wu Li Masters (7), scientists and technicians (9), the sodium spec- trum (10), Bohr's model of the atom (12). Einstein Doesn't Like It The new physics and the old physics (18), Newton's physics (21), the Great Machine (22), do we create reality? (28), the myth of objectivity (30), subatomic "particles" (31), statistics (33), the kinetic theory of gases (33), probability (35), the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (37), prag- matism (38), split-brain analysis (39), summary of the new physics and the old physics (41). PATTERNS OF ORGANIC ENERGY (Quantum Mechanics) Living? Organic and inorganic (45), Max Planck (48), "discontinuous" (48), black-body radiation (50), Planck's constant (51), Albert Einstein (52), Einstein's theory of the photoelectric effect (53), waves, wavelengths, frequencies, and amplitudes (54), diffrac- tion (58), Young's double-slit experiment (60), the wave-par- ticle duality (64), probability waves (65). What Happens The procedure of quantum mechanics (67), the region of prep- aration (68), the region of measurement (68), the observed system (69), the observing system (69), the Schrodinger wave ' xv xvi / SYNOPTIC TABLE OF CONTENTS equation (70), observables (70), particles as "correlations" (70), wave functions (73), probability functions (73), quantum jumps (75), the Theory of Measurement (76), the metaphysics of quantum mechanics (80), the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (83), Schrodinger's cat (85), Doubting Thomas (88). MY WAY (Quantum Mechanics) The Role of "1" The "in here—out there" illusion (92), complementarity (93), Compton scattering (93), Louis de Broglie (96), matter waves (96), Erwin Schrodinger (99), standing waves (99), the Pauli exclusion principle (103), the Schrodinger wave equation (again) (104), Max Born (105), probability waves (again) (106), the quantum model of the atom (107), Werner Heisenberg (109), the S Matrix (110), the Heisenberg uncertainty prin- ciple (111), the tables are turned (114). NONSENSE (Relativity) Beginner's Mind Nonsense (117), the beginner's mind (118), the special theory of relativity (L20), the Galilean relativity principle (123), iner- tial co-ordinate systems (123), Galilean transformations (125), the constancy of the speed of light (127), the ether (129), the Michelson-Morley experiment (130), FitzGerald contractions (132), Lorentz transformations (133). Special Nonsense The special theory of relativity (134), "proper" and "rela- tive" length and time (139). Terrell's rotation explanation of relativistic contraction (142), relativistic mass increase (144), simultaneity (145), the space-time continuum (149), the space- time interval (150), Hermann Minkowski (154), mass-energy (154), conservation laws (156). General Nonsense Gravity and acceleration (161), inside and outside the eleva- tors (163), gravitational mass and inertial mass (167), the geog- raphy of the spacetime continuum (168), Euclidean geometry SYNOPTIC TABLE OF CONTENTS / xvii (171), the revolving circles (172), non-Euclidean geometry (175), Einstein's ultimate vision (179), Mercury's perihelion (180), starlight deflection (181), gravitational rcdshift (182). Black Holes (184), the illusion of "force" (186), the illusion of "nonsense" (187). I CLUTCH MY IDEAS (Particle Physics) The Particle Zoo The barriers to change (191), the hall of mirrors (192), the new world view (193), particle physics (195), bubble chambers (195), the dance of creation and annihilation (196), what made the tracks? (198), quantum field theory (199), the need to pretend (201), particle masses (202), massless particles (205), charge (206), spin (207), angular momentum (207), quantum numbers (210), anti-particles (210). The Dance Space-time diagrams (212), Fcynman diagrams (214), the dance of creation and annihilation (again) (215), anti-particles (again) (217), the illusion of time (219), entropy (221), virtual photons (222), the electromagnetic force (225), Hideki Yukawa (226), the strong force (226), virtual mesons (228), self-interactions (229), gravity (233), the weak force (234), virtual photons (again) (234), vacuum diagrams (240), conservation laws (241), symmetries (243), quarks (244), the S Matrix (again) (245). ENLIGHTENMENT (Quantum Logic ^Bell's Theorem) More Than Both Physics and enlightenment (255), Bell's theorem and quantum logic (257), John von Neumann (257), the description of a wave function (257), "Projections as Propositions" (,259), Da\ id Finkelstein (261), symbols and experience (261), logos and mythos (261), the distributive law (263), polarization of light (264), the third polarizer paradox (267), superpositions (270), quantum logic (271), "proof" (271), transition tables (273), lattices (275), von Neumann's disproof of the distributive law (277), quantum topology (280).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2007 Abstracts Und Curricula Bewusstsein Und Quantencomputer
    BEWUSSTSEIN UND QUANTENCOMPUTER CONSCIOUSNESS AND QUANTUMCOMPUTERS ______________________________________________________________ 7. SCHWEIZER BIENNALE ZU WISSENSCHAFT, TECHNIK + ÄSTHETIK THE 7th SWISS BIENNIAL ON SCIENCE, TECHNICS + AESTHETICS 20. / 21. Januar 2007 / January 20 - 21, 2007 Verkehrshaus der Schweiz, Luzern Swiss Museum of Transport, Lucerne Veranstalter: Neue Galerie Luzern, www.neugalu.ch Organized by: New Gallery Lucerne, www.neugalu.ch ______________________________________________________________ A B S T R A C T S Samstag, 20. Januar 2007 / Saturday, January 20, 2007 Verkehrshaus der Schweiz / Swiss Museum of Transport Keynote 12.15 - 12.45 BRIAN JOSEPHSON Quantenphysik Cambridge / UK IS QUANTUM MECHANICS OR COMPUTATION MORE FUNDAMENTAL? IST DIE QUANTENMECHANIK ODER DAS RECHNEN FUNDAMENTALER? Is quantum mechanics as currently conceived the ultimate theory of nature? In his book "Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge", Niels Bohr argued that because of the uncertainty principle quantum methodology might not be applicable to the study of the ultimate details of life. Delbruck disagreed, claiming that biosystems are robust to quantum disturbances, an assertion that is only partially valid rendering Bohr's argument still significant, even though normally ignored. The methods of the quantum physicist and of the biological sciences can be seen to involve two alternative approaches to the understanding of nature that can usefully complement each other, neither on its own containing the full story. That full story, taking into
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Fellow Quantum Mechanics;
    Dear Fellow Quantum Mechanics Jeremy Bernstein Abstract: This is a letter of inquiry about the nature of quantum mechanics. I have been reflecting on the sociology of our little group and as is my wont here are a few notes. I see our community divided up into various subgroups. I will try to describe them beginning with a small group of elderly but distinguished physicist who either believe that there is no problem with the quantum theory and that the young are wasting their time or that there is a problem and that they have solved it. In the former category is Rudolf Peierls and in the latter Phil Anderson. I will begin with Peierls. In the January 1991 issue of Physics World Peierls published a paper entitled “In defence of ‘measurement’”. It was one of the last papers he wrote. It was in response to his former pupil John Bell’s essay “Against measurement” which he had published in the same journal in August of 1990. Bell, who had died before Peierls’ paper was published, had tried to explain some of the difficulties of quantum mechanics. Peierls would have none of it.” But I do not agree with John Bell,” he wrote,” that these problems are very difficult. I think it is easy to give an acceptable account…” In the rest of his short paper this is what he sets out to do. He begins, “In my view the most fundamental statement of quantum mechanics is that the wave function or more generally the density matrix represents our knowledge of the system we are trying to describe.” Of course the wave function collapses when this knowledge is altered.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Nature of Matter: Made Easy (Lesson 3) Matter Behaving As a Wave? Ridiculous!
    Wave Nature of Matter: Made Easy (Lesson 3) Matter behaving as a wave? Ridiculous! Compiled by Dr. SuchandraChatterjee Associate Professor Department of Chemistry Surendranath College Remember? I showed you earlier how Einstein (in 1905) showed that the photoelectric effect could be understood if light were thought of as a stream of particles (photons) with energy equal to hν. I got my Nobel prize for that. Louis de Broglie (in 1923) If light can behave both as a wave and a particle, I wonder if a particle can also behave as a wave? Louis de Broglie I’ll try messing around with some of Einstein’s formulae and see what I can come up with. I can imagine a photon of light. If it had a “mass” of mp, then its momentum would be given by p = mpc where c is the speed of light. Now Einstein has a lovely formula that he discovered linking mass with energy (E = mc2) and he also used Planck’s formula E = hf. What if I put them equal to each other? mc2 = hf mc2 = hf So for my photon 2 mp = hfhf/c/c So if p = mpc = hfhf/c/c p = mpc = hf/chf/c Now using the wave equation, c = fλ (f = c/λ) So mpc = hc /λc /λc= h/λ λ = hp So you’re saying that a particle of momentum p has a wavelength equal to Planck’s constant divided by p?! Yes! λ = h/p It will be known as the de Broglie wavelength of the particle Confirmation of de Broglie’s ideas De Broglie didn’t have to wait long for his idea to be shown to be correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Hero Villain Place Result Avengers Spotlight #26 Iron Man
    Issue Hero Villain Place Result Avengers Spotlight #26 Iron Man, Hawkeye Wizard, other villains Vault Breakout stopped, but some escape New Mutants #86 Rusty, Skids Vulture, Tinkerer, Nitro Albany Everyone Arrested Damage Control #1 John, Gene, Bart, (Cap) Wrecking Crew Vault Thunderball and Wrecker escape Avengers #311 Quasar, Peggy Carter, other Avengers employees Doombots Avengers Hydrobase Hydrobase destroyed Captain America #365 Captain America Namor (controlled by Controller) Statue of Liberty Namor defeated Fantastic Four #334 Fantastic Four Constrictor, Beetle, Shocker Baxter Building FF victorious Amazing Spider-Man #326 Spiderman Graviton Daily Bugle Graviton wins Spectacular Spiderman #159 Spiderman Trapster New York Trapster defeated, Spidey gets cosmic powers Wolverine #19 & 20 Wolverine, La Bandera Tiger Shark Tierra Verde Tiger Shark eaten by sharks Cloak & Dagger #9 Cloak, Dagger, Avengers Jester, Fenris, Rock, Hydro-man New York Villains defeated Web of Spiderman #59 Spiderman, Puma Titania Daily Bugle Titania defeated Power Pack #53 Power Pack Typhoid Mary NY apartment Typhoid kills PP's dad, but they save him. Incredible Hulk #363 Hulk Grey Gargoyle Las Vegas Grey Gargoyle defeated, but escapes Moon Knight #8-9 Moon Knight, Midnight, Punisher Flag Smasher, Ultimatum Brooklyn Ultimatum defeated, Flag Smasher killed Doctor Strange #11 Doctor Strange Hobgoblin, NY TV studio Hobgoblin defeated Doctor Strange #12 Doctor Strange, Clea Enchantress, Skurge Empire State Building Enchantress defeated Fantastic Four #335-336 Fantastic
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Physicists Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh
    Fun Quiz FAMOUS PHYSICISTS HIMANSU SEKHAR FATESINGH 1. The first woman to 6. He first succeeded in receive the Nobel Prize in producing the nuclear physics was chain reaction. a. Maria G. Mayer a. Otto Hahn b. Irene Curie b. Fritz Strassmann c. Marie Curie c. Robert Oppenheimer d. Lise Meitner d. Enrico Fermi 2. Who first suggested electron 7. The credit for discovering shells around the nucleus? electron microscope is often a. Ernest Rutherford attributed to b. Neils Bohr a. H. Germer c. Erwin Schrödinger b. Ernst Ruska d. Wolfgang Pauli c. George P. Thomson d. Clinton J. Davisson 8. The wave theory of light was 3. He first measured negative first proposed by charge on an electron. a. Christiaan Huygens a. J. J. Thomson b. Isaac Newton b. Clinton Davisson c. Hermann Helmholtz c. Louis de Broglie d. Augustin Fresnel d. Robert A. Millikan 9. He was the first scientist 4. The existence of quarks was to find proof of Einstein’s first suggested by theory of relativity a. Max Planck a. Edwin Hubble b. Sheldon Glasgow b. George Gamow c. Murray Gell-Mann c. S. Chandrasekhar d. Albert Einstein d. Arthur Eddington 10. The credit for development of the cyclotron 5. The phenomenon of goes to: superconductivity was a. Carl Anderson b. Donald Glaser discovered by c. Ernest O. Lawrence d. Charles Wilson a. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes b. Alex Muller c. Brian D. Josephson 11. Who first proposed the use of absolute scale d. John Bardeen of Temperature? a. Anders Celsius b. Lord Kelvin c. Rudolf Clausius d.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Physicists
    Great Physicists Great Physicists The Life and Times of Leading Physicists from Galileo to Hawking William H. Cropper 1 2001 1 Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogota´ Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence HongKong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris Sao Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright ᭧ 2001 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cropper, William H. Great Physicists: the life and times of leadingphysicists from Galileo to Hawking/ William H. Cropper. p. cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–19–513748–5 1. Physicists—Biography. I. Title. QC15 .C76 2001 530'.092'2—dc21 [B] 2001021611 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xi I. Mechanics Historical Synopsis 3 1. How the Heavens Go 5 Galileo Galilei 2. A Man Obsessed 18 Isaac Newton II. Thermodynamics Historical Synopsis 41 3. A Tale of Two Revolutions 43 Sadi Carnot 4. On the Dark Side 51 Robert Mayer 5. A Holy Undertaking59 James Joule 6. Unities and a Unifier 71 Hermann Helmholtz 7. The Scientist as Virtuoso 78 William Thomson 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Dimensional Entanglement Transport Through Single-Mode Fibre
    Multi-dimensional entanglement transport through single-mode fibre Jun Liu,1, ∗ Isaac Nape,2, ∗ Qianke Wang,1 Adam Vall´es,2 Jian Wang,1 and Andrew Forbes2 1Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China. 2School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa (Dated: April 8, 2019) The global quantum network requires the distribution of entangled states over long distances, with significant advances already demonstrated using entangled polarisation states, reaching approxi- mately 1200 km in free space and 100 km in optical fibre. Packing more information into each photon requires Hilbert spaces with higher dimensionality, for example, that of spatial modes of light. However spatial mode entanglement transport requires custom multimode fibre and is lim- ited by decoherence induced mode coupling. Here we transport multi-dimensional entangled states down conventional single-mode fibre (SMF). We achieve this by entangling the spin-orbit degrees of freedom of a bi-photon pair, passing the polarisation (spin) photon down the SMF while ac- cessing multi-dimensional orbital angular momentum (orbital) subspaces with the other. We show high fidelity hybrid entanglement preservation down 250 m of SMF across multiple 2 × 2 dimen- sions, demonstrating quantum key distribution protocols, quantum state tomographies and quantum erasers. This work offers an alternative approach to spatial mode entanglement transport that fa- cilitates deployment in legacy networks across conventional fibre. Entanglement is an intriguing aspect of quantum me- chanics with well-known quantum paradoxes such as those of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) [1], Hardy [2], and Leggett [3].
    [Show full text]
  • MV2015-Aou Age of Ultron OP Instruction Sheet 2
    Licensed Product: Marvel HeroClix: Age of Ultron Event Two Organized Play Kit Release Date: June 24, 2015 Additional Authorized Uses (If any): In-store Organized Play events; duplication of Instruction and Score sheets is authorized. Marvel HeroClix: Age of Ultron Event Two Organized Play Instruction Sheet July 2015 “I am he who will not rest until all mankind is utterly destroyed. I am Ultron!” - Ultron-18 Iron Man #47, Marvel Comics Organized Play (OP) Kit Contents: • Four (4) Graviton Limited Edition Figure Competitive Prizes • 11 Hulk Avengers ID Card Participation Prizes • Event Two Instruction Sheet Directions: • Schedule your Age of Ultron Event Two in the WizKids Event System (WES). Event templates have been uploaded into the WES for your convenience. The suggested format for the Event Two is a 300 point, Sealed event utilizing one of the two models listed below (store’s discretion): o One (1) Marvel HeroClix: Age of Ultron Booster pack (from Wave 1, SKU 71879), and one other (not Age of Ultron) HeroClix Booster, OR o Two (2) Marvel HeroClix: Age of Ultron Booster Packs (from Wave 1, SKU 71879). • Resources and Relics from the Marvel HeroClix: Age of Ultron: Original Avengers Fast Forces (SKU 71877), Marvel HeroClix: Ant-Man Box Set (SKU 71908) or a prior Marvel HeroClix: Age of Ultron event are allowed for use on a player’s force. • The Hulk Avengers ID Cards are Participation Prizes, and are to be awarded upon completion of Event Two to each player. There are 11 pieces of each item to allow for up to 10 participants and the event’s Judge.
    [Show full text]
  • “Kings of Cool” Superconductivity Who Are These People? SUPERCONDUCTORS
    “““Kings of Cool” Superconductivity Who are these people? SUPERCONDUCTORS An Introduction by Prof George Walmsley Normal conductor eg copper • Current, I. • Voltage drop, V. • Resistance, R = ? • Ans: V/I = R eg 2 Volts/1 Amp = 2 Ohms I Copper I V Normal conductor eg copper • Source of resistance: • Electron collides with lattice ion to produce heat (phonon). Copper lattice Lower Temperature • What happens when we cool a metal? • Ans 1: The electrons slow down and current is reduced maybe to zero. R→∞ • Ans 2: The lattice stops vibrating and resistance disappears. R=0 How do we cool things? • Commonly used liquid refrigerants: Element Boiling Pt Oxygen 90K Nitrogen 77K Hydrogen 20K Helium 4.2K Thomas Andrews, Chemist • 9 Dec 1813 – 26 Nov 1885 • John (Flax spinner, Comber) [ggfather] • Michael (Linen, Ardoyne) [gfather] • Thomas (Linen merchant) [father] • Studied under James Thomson, RBAI • 1828 Univ of Glasgow, Thos Thomson • 1830 Paris, Dumas • 1830-34 Trinity College Dublin • 1835 MD U of Edinburgh • 1835-45 Prof of Chemistry RBAI • 1845 Vice-President, Queen’s College • 1847 Prof of Chemistry, Queen’s College • 1869 Bakerian Lecture on CO 2 • 1871 Visit by Dr Janssen of Leiden • Photo: Paris 1875 Andrews’ Isotherms • Note critical temperature NORMAL CONDUCTOR: Electrical properties Normal metal eg copper Resistance and (resistivity, ρ) >0 As temperature falls ρ falls smoothly too: ρ 0 100 200 273.15 Temperature/K SUPERCONDUCTOR: Electrical properties Superconductor eg mercury, lead Resistivity ( ρ) >0 like normal metal down to critical
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Quantum Spin Correlations of Relativistic Electron Pairs
    Study of quantum spin correlations of relativistic electron pairs Project status Nov. 2015 Jacek Ciborowski Marta Włodarczyk, Michał Drągowski, Artem Poliszczuk (UW) Joachim Enders, Yuliya Fritsche (TU Darmstadt) Warszawa 20.XI.2015 Quantum spin correlations In this exp: e1,e2 – electrons under study a, b - directions of spin projections (+- ½) 4 combinations for e1 and e2: ++, --, +-, -+ Probabilities: P++ , P+- , P-+ , P- - (ΣP=1) Correlation function : C = P++ + P-- - P-+ - P-+ Historical perspective • Einstein Podolsky Rosen (EPR) paradox (1935): QM is not a complete local realistic theory • Bohm & Aharonov formulation involving spin correlations (1957) • Bell inequalities (1964) a local realistic theory must obey a class of inequalities • practical approach to Bell’s inequalities: counting aacoincidences to measure correlations The EPR paradox Boris Podolsky Nathan Rosen Albert Einstein (1896-1966) (1909-1995) (1979-1955) A. Afriat and F. Selleri, The Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen Paradox (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1999) Bohm’s version with the spin Two spin-1/2 fermions in a singlet state: E.g. if spin projection of 1 on Z axis is measured 1/2 spin projection of 2 must be -1/2 All projections should be elements of reality (QM predicts that only S2 and David Bohm (1917-1992) Sz can be determined) Hidden variables? ”Quantum Theory” (1951) Phys. Rev. 85(1952)166,180 The Bell inequalities J.S.Bell: Impossible to reconcile the concept of hidden variables with statistical predictions of QM If local realism quantum correlations
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Eraser
    Quantum Eraser March 18, 2015 It was in 1935 that Albert Einstein, with his collaborators Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, exploiting the bizarre property of quantum entanglement (not yet known under that name which was coined in Schrödinger (1935)), noted that QM demands that systems maintain a variety of ‘correlational properties’ amongst their parts no matter how far the parts might be sepa- rated from each other (see 1935, the source of what has become known as the EPR paradox). In itself there appears to be nothing strange in this; such cor- relational properties are common in classical physics no less than in ordinary experience. Consider two qualitatively identical billiard balls approaching each other with equal but opposite velocities. The total momentum is zero. After they collide and rebound, measurement of the velocity of one ball will naturally reveal the velocity of the other. But the EPR argument coupled this observation with the orthodox Copen- hagen interpretation of QM, which states that until a measurement of a par- ticular property is made on a system, that system cannot, in general, be said to possess any definite value of that property. It is easy to see that if dis- tant correlations are preserved through measurement processes that ‘bring into being’ the measured values there is a prima facie conflict between the Copenhagen interpretation and the relativistic stricture that no information can be transmitted faster than the speed of light. Suppose, for example, we have a system with some property which is anti-correlated (in real cases, this property could be spin).
    [Show full text]
  • Required Readings
    HPS/PHIL 93872 Spring 2006 Historical Foundations of the Quantum Theory Don Howard, Instructor Required Readings: Topic: Readings: Planck and black-body radiation. Martin Klein. “Planck, Entropy, and Quanta, 19011906.” The Natural Philosopher 1 (1963), 83-108. Martin Klein. “Einstein’s First Paper on Quanta.” The Natural Einstein and the photo-electric effect. Philosopher 2 (1963), 59-86. Max Jammer. “Regularities in Line Spectra”; “Bohr’s Theory The Bohr model of the atom and spectral of the Hydrogen Atom.” In The Conceptual Development of series. Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966, pp. 62- 88. The Bohr-Sommerfeld “old” quantum Max Jammer. “The Older Quantum Theory.” In The Conceptual theory; Einstein on transition Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill, probabilities. 1966, pp. 89-156. The Bohr-Kramers-Slater theory. Max Jammer. “The Transition to Quantum Mechanics.” In The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966, pp. 157-195. Bose-Einstein statistics. Don Howard. “‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf,’ or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909-1935: Einstein’s Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems.” In Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Arthur Miller, ed. New York: Plenum, 1990, pp. 61-111. Max Jammer. “The Formation of Quantum Mechanics.” In The Schrödinger and wave mechanics; Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Heisenberg and matrix mechanics. McGraw-Hill, 1966, pp. 196-280. James T. Cushing. “Early Attempts at Causal Theories: A De Broglie and the origins of pilot-wave Stillborn Program.” In Quantum Mechanics: Historical theory.
    [Show full text]