Taxonomy of the Rock/Water Pipit Superspecies Anthus Petrosus, Spinoletta and Rubescens
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Taxonomy of the Rock/Water Pipit superspecies Anthus petrosus, spinoletta and rubescens Alan Knox t the time of the last British checklist (BOU 1971), the Rock and AWater Pipits were generally regarded as one polytypic species of Holarctic distribution, Anthus spinoletta. This species ranged from western Europe to eastern Siberia, across North America from Alaska to western Greenland and southwards along the Rocky Mountains. Recently, the British Ornithologists' Union Records Committee, on the recommenda tion of its taxonomic working group, decided to treat these pipits as a superspecies composed of three species, A. petrosus, A. spinoletta and A. rubescens, all of which occur or have occurred in Britain and Ireland (BOURC 1986; table 1). In this paper, I shall briefly give the background to this decision. Geographic variation Many of the subspecies within the original Rock/Water Pipit complex (table 1) grade into one another to some extent. This is particularly so with the forms in western Europe, where a cline runs from the longer- billed and darker 'kleinschmidti' (see below), through petrosus, to the shorter- billed and paler littoralis (Hall 1961). These races also vary in the extent to which they undergo a moult in late winter. In the cases of 'kleinschmidti' and petrosus, the winter plumage is largely retained and the birds are dark and heavily streaked as the breeding season approaches. A distinctive spring plumage is acquired by littoralis, to a degree which varies between individuals. Some petrosus from Ouessant, France, appear to be intermedi ate, and moult into littoralis-\\ke spring plumage (Mayaud 1952). Although the northern end of this cline is called kleinschmidti, this form is 206 [Brit.Binha1:206-211,May I9RB] Taxonomy of Rock/Water Pipits 207 only poorly differentiated and arbitrarily separated from petrosus. Its geographic range is not clear (Vaurie 1959; Hall 1961; Williamson 1965). As with several other names given to stages in this cline, it is perhaps best synonymised (BOUTS 1956). The acceptable northwestern forms (petrosus and littoralis) differ from the remaining subspecies in being more olive- brown instead of greyish on the upperparts, especially the rump, with the underparts more extensively streaked and washed with yellow-buff, and by the outer-tail pattern being dusky rather than pure white. Nominate spinoletta is more lightly streaked, and the underparts are flushed with pale pink in spring. The Middle Eastern form, coutellii, is smaller than nominate spinoletta, and more heavily streaked, with more orange tones and a warmer pink on the breast in spring. A. s. blakistoni is paler than either nominate spinoletta or coutellii, and less heavily streaked than the latter. More distinctive than either coutellii or blakistoni, japonicus is dark, with heavy spotting in autumn. The underparts in spring are sparsely marked, and washed orange-buff rather than pink. The white in the tail is more extensive, and the legs are pale. The North American races are all similar to japonicus, although warmer brown in autumn, and with lighter streaking. In spring, they are greyer and darker above, with little or no streaking below. The legs are dark. The populations in western North America tend to be paler than those farther east, and may not be separable. The race in the Rocky Mountains, alticola, has a rich spring plumage. (Plumage notes based on Hall 1961 and Vaurie 1959.) Table 1. The subspecies of the Rock/Water Pipit superspecies (based on Hall 1961 and Vaurie 1959) * Regarded here as synonym of petrosus I. Conspecific under the name A. petrosus 2. Conspecific under the name/1, spinoletta 3. Conspecific under the name A. albescens Subspecies Breeding distribution [kleinschmidti* Faroe Islands and possibly Scottish outlying islands] 1 petrosus Ireland, Britain, northwest France 1 littoralis Fennoscandia and northwest Russia 2 spinoletta Southern and central F'.urope 2 coutellii Asia Minor, Caucasus and Iran 2 blakistoni Central Asia 3 japonicus Eastern Asia 3 pacificus Western North America 3 rubescens Eastern North America and western Greenland 3 alticola Central and southern Rocky Mountains Separation of 'A. rubescens' from 'A. spinoletta' Recent work in the USSR has shown that blakistoni and japonicus live 'side by side' in Transbaykalia (Nazarenko 1978). The two forms were found to occupy different habitats, blakistoni inhabiting 'tundra' with few or no rocks, and japonicus (which was much rarer) on parts of the same 'tundra' where rocks were abundant. There was no evidence of hybridisation, and Nazarenko believed that the two populations were behaving as different species. Shirihai & Colston (1987) have provided further references to the 208 Taxonomy of Rock/Water Pipits Fig. 1. Breeding distributions of Rock Pipit Anthus petrosus (black), Water Pipit A. spinoletta See Table 1 for Soviet literature which confirm the differences between these taxa. Since the North American races are thought to be closely related to japonicus, all these forms are now best removed from A. spinoletta (which includes blakistoni), under the name A. rubescens (this being the oldest name within the newly separated species). Alstrom & Mild (in press & in prep.) consider that morphological and vocal differences alone would justify the separation of these species. There have been four records of A. r. rubescens in Britain and Ireland: St Kilda in September 1910, Wexford in October 1951, Fair Isle in September 1953, and Wicklow in November 1967 (BOU 1971). Three other records, one of which predates the above, are still under consideration. Elsewhere in Europe, there have been three records of this subspecies from Helgoland (November 1851, May 1858 and September 1899), and one in Italy (November 1951)(Glutz 1985). A. r. japonicus is a scarce, but regular, passage migrant and winter visitor to the Middle East (Shirihai & Colston 1987; Alstrom & Mild in press), and there is one European record, from Italy in October 1960 (Bonfio 1962). Rock and Water Pipits The original concept of A. spinoletta (i.e. including A. rubescens) comprised two distinct ecological groups of races—the petrosus group (petrosus and littoralis, together known as the Rock Pipits) and the spinoletta group (all the remaining races, known as the Water Pipits). During the breeding season, the former is largely confined to the rocky coasts of northern and western Europe, whereas the latter 'consists predominantly of inland forms occurring on tundras, barren tracks, alpine pastures, and rocky grassy slopes with or without scrub, and particularly along streams' (Vaurie 1959). Although Rock and Water Pipits are entirely allopatric during the breeding season, they are sometimes found alongside one another in winter. Bijlsma (1977) studied littoralis and nominate spinoletta at one such Taxonomy of Rock/Water Pipits 209 stippled) and American Pipit A. rubescens (vertical shading) (after Glutz 1985). fistribution of races site in the Netherlands. He found differences in the distribution of the two forms between the available habitats, with spinoletta in wetter places than littoralis: where they occurred together, they were separated by microhabi- tat. It is sometimes found that conspecific subspecies differ in the habitats they utilise while on passage or in winter (e.g. Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava subspecies: Fry et al. 1972), but this is usually the case also with distinct species. Bijlsma found that his Rock and Water Pipits roosted in different habitats. In Britain, Water Pipits roost communally, unlike Rock Pipits (Biber 1986). Rock and Water Pipits have also shown different food and habitat requirements within Britain, spinoletta particularly avoiding saline environments (Gibb 1956; Johnson 1966, 1970; Biber 1986). The main plumage differences between the groups are described above, but they are not absolute. Some littoralis, for example, have greyish tones on the upperparts and Konigstedt & Miiller (1983) reported that 'exceptional individuals [of nominate spinoletta] cannot be separated from littoralis on tail feather colouration alone.' Under these circumstances, other characters must be used as well: either plumage features, or perhaps vocalisations. Separation of 'A. petrosus' from 'A. spinoletta' The Rock and European Water Pipits are generally quite distinctive and easy to identify. Their breeding ranges are widely separated, and they occupy very different habitats: the former coastal, the latter montane. During winter, they have different ecological requirements. There are clearly good reasons for considering them to be different species. Allopatric breeding populations frequently cause difficulties for tax- onomists: there is no direct evidence as to whether the forms would or would not successfully interbreed if they were to come into contact. The morphological and ecological differences between Rock and Water Pipits in Europe are, however, at least as pronounced as those between A. s. blakistoni and A. r. japonicus. We believe, therefore, that it is appropriate to treat the petrosus and spinoletta groups as separate species. 210 Taxonomy of Rock/Water Pipits The BOU proposes to treat the British forms of the superspecies in the following manner: A. petmsus petrosus ~\ „ ,,. • .4. petrosus Uttoralis J " .4. spinoletta spinoletta Water Pipit ,4. albescens mbescens American Pipit The sequence conforms with the principles used by Voous (1977): Anthus is an Old World genus; the exclusively Palearctic taxa are therefore placed first, with mbescens following.