29736 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 1999 / Notices least equal to that provided to American Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30113; delegation of petition from owners by S4.1(j). authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Corporation (GM) for an exemption from Issued on: May 26, 1999. the parts-marking requirements of the The Public Interest and Safety Ricardo Martinez, Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part MBUSI argued that the exemption Administrator. 541) for the model year MY 1991 ‘‘would be helpful in improving the [FR Doc. 99–13896 Filed 6–1–99; 8:45 am] DeVille. The DeVille line trade deficit currently being suffered by BILLING CODE 4910±59±P was equipped with the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ the United States,’’ possessing the antitheft device. (See 55 FR 17854, April potential to expand into other lines. The 27, 1990). In April 1991, NHTSA owners of exempted M Class vehicles DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION published in the Federal Register a will contribute to local economies notice granting in part the petition from during their sojourn in the United National Highway Traffic Safety General Motors Corporation (GM) for an States. Advocates argued that foreign Administration exemption from the parts-marking tourists will continue to visit the United requirements of the Theft Prevention Petition for Modification of Exemption States and contribute to local economies Standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the From the Vehicle Theft Prevention if the application is denied. Although it model year MY 1992 Standard; General Motors Corporation may be in the public interest to Bonneville. The Bonneville car line was encourage sales of products made in this AGENCY: National Highway Traffic equipped with the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ country, particularly those that are Safety Administration (NHTSA), antitheft device. (See 56 FR 14413, April exclusively made in the United States Department of Transportation (DOT). 9, 1991). In March 1992, NHTSA such as the M Class, this is not a factor ACTION: published in the Federal Register a that NHTSA considers in its regulatory Grant of a petition for modification for previously approved notice granting in part the petition from decisions under the vehicle safety law. General Motors Corporation (GM) for an Advocates contends that MBUSI’s antitheft devices. exemption from the parts-marking application ‘‘makes only superficial and SUMMARY: This agency granted in part requirements of the Theft Prevention conclusory assertions that the vehicles General Motors Corporation’s (GM) Standard (49 CFR Part 541) for the will provide safety equal to that of petitions for exemption from the parts- model year MY 1993 LeSabre. vehicles built to all U.S. standards.’’ marking requirements of the vehicle The LeSabre car line was equipped with Based on our review of the MBUSI theft prevention standard on April 27, the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ antitheft device. (See petition, as supplemented by materials 1990, April 9, 1991 and March 26, 1992, 57 FR 10517, March 26, 1992). In submitted in response to our request, we for the Cadillac DeVille, Pontiac August 1993, NHTSA published in the conclude that MBUSI has adequately Bonneville, and Buick LeSabre car lines, Federal Register a notice granting in full supported its request. respectively. On August 25, 1993, this An exemption from the standards the petition from General Motors agency granted in full General Motors Corporation (GM) for an exemption from would be consistent with motor vehicle Corporation’s (GM) petition for safety since the exempted vehicles the parts-marking requirements of the exemption from the parts-marking Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part possess an overall level of safety at least requirements of the vehicle theft equal to that of nonexempted vehicles 541) for the model year 1995 prevention standard for the . The Aurora car line and will only be used for a limited time Aurora car line. This notice grants in in the United States in any event. was equipped with the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ full GM’s petition for modification of antitheft device. (See 58 FR 44872, Decision the previously approved antitheft device August 25, 1993). In consideration of the foregoing, it is for the Aurora car line, and provides for The agency granted partial hereby found that compliance with each full exemption of three car lines exemptions for the Cadillac DeVille, of the standards discussed above would (Cadillac DeVille, , Pontiac Bonneville and Buick LeSabre prevent the manufacturer from selling a and Buick LeSabre) that were previously lines at that time because the devices motor vehicle with an overall safety granted partial exemptions. The agency lacked an audible and visual alarm level at least equal to the overall safety grants this petition because it has system. As such, the GM systems level of nonexempt vehicles, and that an determined, based on substantial lacked, as standard equipment, an exemption is consistent with the public evidence, that the modified antitheft important feature that the agency has interest and motor vehicle safety. device described in GM’s petition to be defined in its rulemaking on Part 543 as Accordingly, Mercedes-Benz U.S. placed on the car lines as standard one of several attributes which International, Inc., is hereby granted equipment, is likely to be as effective in contribute to the effectiveness of an NHTSA Temporary Exemption No. 99– reducing and deterring motor vehicle antitheft device: automatic activation of 3, expiring May 1, 2001, for M Class theft as compliance with the parts- the device; an audible or visual signal vehicles, from: providing the word marking requirements. that is connected to the hood, doors, ‘‘brake’’ required by Table 2 of 49 CFR DATES: The exemption granted by this and trunk, and draws attention to 571.101 Standard No. 101 Controls and notice is effective beginning with model vehicle tampering; and a disabling Displays, requirements for side marker year (MY) 2000. mechanism designed to prevent a thief lamps and reflectors, and headlamps FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. from moving a vehicle under its own complying with S7 of 49 CFR 571.108 Rosalind Proctor, Office of Planning and power without a key. The lack of an Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 400 audible or visual warning device made Devices, and Associated Equipment, Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC the agency uncertain as to whether the S5.4.2 of 49 CFR 571.111 Standard No. 20590. Ms. Proctor’s telephone number device would be as effective as parts 111 Rearview Mirrors, S5.3 of 49 CFR is (202) 366–4807. Her fax number is marking in deterring theft of these 571.120 Standard No. 120 Tires for (202) 493–2739. vehicles. Consequently, the agency Vehicles Other Than Passenger , SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In April believed that because of the lack of theft and S4.1(j) of 49 CFR 571.209 Standard 1990, NHTSA published in the Federal data and information available at that No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies. Register a notice granting in part the time for lines installed with antitheft

VerDate 06-MAY-99 13:35 Jun 01, 1999 Jkt 183247 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\A02JN3.123 pfrm01 PsN: 02JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 1999 / Notices 29737 devices that did not have an audible or ‘‘PASS-Key’’ system, which was the and the decoder module will be visual alarm system, GM should be basis for the agency’s previous granting mounted behind the instrument panel granted a partial rather than full of a partial theft exemption for car lines for the MY 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora and exemption. Therefore, GM was required that had, as standard equipment, the Pontiac Bonneville. The ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ to mark the lines’ engine and ‘‘PASS-Key’’ system. decoder module and antenna will be transmission only. GM stated that for MY 2000, the located in the steering column for the The ‘‘PASS-Key’’ theft deterrent ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ antitheft device to be MY 2000 Cadillac DeVille and Buick system utilized an ignition key, an used on the Cadillac DeVille, Pontiac LeSabre lines. GM stated that the device ignition lock cylinder and a decoder Bonneville, Buick LeSabre and cannot be defeated by removing and module. The conventional mechanical Oldsmobile Aurora car lines will utilize then subsequently reapplying vehicle code permits the key to release the more advanced technology than the power. Additionally, GM stated that and transmission shift ‘‘PASS-Key’’ or ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ devices. replacement of the decoder module will lever locks. Before the vehicle can be The ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device will add not defeat the device because of its started the electrical resistance of a new features and refinements to some of decoder module password. pellet embedded in the shank of the key the previous ‘‘PASS-Key/PASS-Key II’’ GM stated that the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ must be sensed by elements in the lock components. As with the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ device has been designed to enhance the cylinder and its value compared to a and ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ antitheft devices, the functionality and theft protection of the fixed resistance in the decoder module ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device will remain fully first and second-generation ‘‘PASS-Key’’ located in the instrument panel in the functional once the ignition has been and ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ devices. However, as passenger compartment. If the key pellet turned off and the key has been in the first and second-generation has the proper resistance, the starter removed. No operator action will be ‘‘PASS-Key’’ devices, the ‘‘PASS-Key enable relay is energized and a discrete required other than removing the key. III’’ device does not provide an alarm, signal is transmitted to the electronic The ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ will also use a either audible or visual to attract the control module. If a key other than the special ignition key and decoder attention to the efforts of an one with the proper resistance for that module. The conventional mechanical unauthorized person to enter or move vehicle is inserted, the decoder module key unlocks and releases the steering the vehicle by means other than a key will shut down for two to four minutes. wheel and transmission lever. However, (49 CFR § 543.6(a)(3)(ii)). To Use of any keys with different resistance before the vehicle can be operated, the substantiate its belief that an alarm pellets will cause the time to recycle key’s electrical code must be sensed by system is not a necessary feature to and begin again with each failed the key cylinder and properly decoded effectively deter the theft of a vehicle, attempt. The components are located in by the decoder module. GM compared the reduction in thefts for the passenger compartment behind the GM stated that the transponder, now Corvettes equipped with a passive instrument panel, with the exception of embedded in the head of the key for the antitheft device with an audible/visible the starter solenoid/starter motor ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device, is stimulated by alarm feature, and the Camaro combination which is physically located a coil surrounding the key cylinder. The and car lines equipped in the engine compartment. transponder in the key then emits a with a passive antitheft device without GM’s ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ device, used on modulated signal at a specified radio an alarm feature. Results of the GM the Oldsmobile Aurora beginning in frequency. The identity of the key is an comparison indicate that the lack of an the1995 model year, utilizes an ignition integral and unique code within the alarm feature did not reduce the key, an ignition lock cylinder and a modulated signal. The key cylinder coil effectiveness of the anti-theft system. In decoder module and is passively receives and sends the modulated signal fact, while there was a 24 percent activated. Unlike the ‘‘PASS-Key’’, in to the decoder. When the decoder reduction in thefts of Corvettes, the the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’, if a key other than module recognizes a valid key code, it Camaro and Firebird car lines the one with proper resistance for the sends an encoded message to the experienced theft reductions of 66 and vehicle is inserted, the decoder module Powertrain Control Module (PCM) to 69 percent respectively. will shut down the fuel injector pulses enable fuel flow and starter operation. If The following GM car lines have the to the engine for three minutes plus or an invalid key is detected, the ‘‘PASS- ‘‘PASS-Key’’ device as standard minus eighteen seconds. In the ‘‘PASS- Key III’’ decoder module will transmit a equipment and have been exempted in Key’’ this shut down period is two to different password to the PCM to part from the requirements of 49 CFR four minutes. Additionally, if during the disable fuel flow and starter operation. Part 541: the Chevrolet Camaro and time the decoder module has shut down The ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device has the Pontiac Firebird, beginning with MY in ‘‘PASS-Key II,’’ trial and error potential for over four trillion unique 1990 (See 54 FR 33655, August 15, attempts are made to start the engine electrical key codes. GM states that the 1989); the Cadillac DeVille/Fleetwood with various keys, the timer for the sheer volume of these codes is a highly and , beginning with MY decoder module does not reset back to effective deterrent to the common 1991 (See 55 FR 17854, April 27, 1990); zero. intruder. If an invalid key is detected, and the Pontiac Bonneville and Buick ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ is a modification of the the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ was designed to shut Park Avenue, beginning with MY 1992 ‘‘PASS-Key’’ theft deterrent system. down for two to four minutes and, the (See 56 FR 14413, April 9, 1991). Since August 1989, the agency has ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ for three minutes plus or NHTSA has also granted exemptions in determined that the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ minus eighteen seconds, preventing part for the following GM car lines that system, installed as standard further attempts at starting the vehicle have ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ as standard equipment, will likely be as effective during that shutdown. GM believes that equipment: the Royale reducing and deterring motor vehicle the time-consuming task of attempting and Buick LeSabre, beginning with MY theft as compliance with the theft to defeat a device having over four 1993 (See 57 FR 10517, March 26, 1992) prevention standard (see 54 FR 33655, trillion key codes by a trial-and-error and the Cadillac Eldorado and Cadillac August 15, 1989). In a February 7, 1992 method eliminates the need for such an Seville, beginning with MY 1994 (see 58 letter to GM, the agency determined that extensive shutdown period. FR 11659, February 26, 1993). changes in the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ The ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ antenna will be Since deciding those petitions, the constituted a de minimis change in the located in the ignition switch assembly, agency has become aware that theft data

VerDate 06-MAY-99 13:35 Jun 01, 1999 Jkt 183247 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\A02JN3.143 pfrm01 PsN: 02JNN1 29738 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 1999 / Notices show declining theft rates for GM Motor Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement device. This information included a vehicles equipped with either version of Act of 1984). description of reliability and functional the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ device. A comparison Additionally, GM compared its MY tests conducted by GM for the ‘‘PASS- of theft data for car lines incorporating 2000 antitheft modification to similar Key III’’ antitheft device and its the ‘‘PASS-Key’’ and ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ devices that have previously been components. devices do not show that the lack of an granted exemptions by the agency. GM The agency has evaluated GM’s MY audible or visual alarm system detracts stated that theft data have indicated a 2000 petition for modification of the from the effectiveness of the ‘‘PASS- decline in theft rates for vehicle lines previous exemptions granted for the Key’’ and ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ devices. The that have been equipped with the Cadillac DeVille, Pontiac Bonneville, agency believes that the data show that ‘‘PASS-Key’’-like systems which have Buick LeSabre and Oldsmobile Aurora over time, despite the absence of an exemptions from the parts-marking car lines from the parts-marking audible or visual alarm system, the standard greater than that for earlier requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The ‘‘PASS-Key’’ and ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ models which were parts marked. agency has determined that the devices, when placed on car lines as ‘‘PASS-Key’’ was made standard on the modified device to be installed on the standard equipment, are as likely to be Camaro, Firebird, Seville and Eldorado DeVille, Bonneville and LeSabre car as effective in deterring and reducing beginning with MY 1989 and on lines are likely to be as effective as parts motor vehicle theft as compliance with Eldorado beginning with MY 1989 and marking in preventing and deterring the parts-marking requirements. on the DeVille/Fleetwood beginning theft of these vehicles, and therefore Based on this information, the agency with 1990. The data provided by GM qualifies for a full rather than partial has granted two GM petitions for full were reported by the Federal Bureau of exemption under 49 CFR Part 543. exemptions for car lines equipped with Investigation’s National Crime Additionally, the agency concludes the ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ antitheft device. Information Center (NCIC), which is that the improvements made to the Those lines are the Chevrolet Lumina NHTSA’s official source of theft data device to be installed on the MY 2000 and car lines, beginning (See 50 FR 46666, November 12, 1985). Oldsmobile Aurora car line constitute a de minimis modification to the existing with the 1997 model year (See 60 FR The NCIC receives reports on all thefts. GM believes that based on the antitheft device. 25938, May 15, 1995) and the Buick reduced theft rates of its ‘‘PASS-Key’’ For the foregoing reasons, the agency Riviera and Oldsmobile Aurora car and ‘‘PASS-Key II’’ equipped car lines hereby grants GM’s petition for lines, beginning with the 1995 model and the proven theft-deterrence success modification of the exemptions from the year (See 58 FR 44872, August 25, of transponder electronics security, the parts-marking requirements previously 1993). In both of those instances, the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device to be introduced granted to the MY 2000 Cadillac agency concluded that a full exemption on the MY 2000 Cadillac DeVille, DeVille, Pontiac Bonneville, Buick was warranted because the ‘‘PASS-Key Pontiac Bonneville, Buick LeSabre and LeSabre and Oldsmobile Aurora car II’’ device had shown itself to be as Oldsmobile Aurora lines is likely to be lines beginning with the 2000 model likely as parts marking to be effective more effective in reducing and deterring year. protection against theft despite the motor vehicle theft than compliance If, in the future, GM decides not to absence of a visual or audible alarm. with the parts marking requirements of use the exemption for the car lines that NHTSA has also granted two 49 CFR Part 541. are the subject of this notice, it should exemptions in full for car lines which The agency believes that there is formally notify the agency. If such a have the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device as substantial evidence indicating that the decision is made, the car line(s) must be standard equipment. Those lines are the modified antitheft device to be installed fully marked according to the (See 61 FR 25734, as standard equipment on the MY 2000 requirements under 49 CFR 541.5 and May 22, 1996) beginning with the 1997 Cadillac DeVille, Pontiac Bonneville, 541.6 (marking of major component model year and the Buick LeSabre and Oldsmobile Aurora parts and replacement parts). beginning with the 1998 model year car lines will likely be as effective in NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the (See 62 FR 20058, April 24, 1997). reducing and deterring motor vehicle future to modify the device on which To ensure reliability and durability of theft as compliance with the this exemption is based, it may have to the device, GM stated that it conducted requirements of the Theft Prevention submit a petition to modify the tests based on its own specified Standard (49 CFR Part 541). This exemption. Section 543.7(d) states that standards. GM provided a detailed list determination is based on the a Part 543 exemption applies only to of specific tests used to validate the information that GM submitted with its vehicles that belong to a line exempted integrity, reliability and durability of the petition and on other available under this part and equipped with the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device. GM stated that information. The agency believes that antitheft device on which the line’s the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ device complied the modified device will continue to exemption is based. Further, Section with the specified requirements for each provide four of the five types of 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission test. performance listed in Section of petitions ‘‘(t)o modify an exemption To substantiate its beliefs as to the 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation; to permit the use of an antitheft device effectiveness of the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ preventing defeat or circumventing of similar to but differing from the one antitheft device, GM referenced data the device by unauthorized persons; specified in that exemption.’’ which provide the basis for GM’s preventing operation of the vehicle by The agency wishes to minimize the confidence that the ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the administrative burden which system will be effective in reducing and reliability and durability of the device. § 543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted deterring motor vehicle theft that are As required by 49 CFR Section vehicle manufacturers and itself. The contained in the response of the 543.6(a)(4), the agency also finds that agency did not intend in drafting Part American Automobile Manufacturers GM has provided adequate reasons for 543 to require the submission of a Association to Docket 97–042; Notice 1 its belief that the modified antitheft modification petition for every change (NHTSA Request for Comments on its device will reduce and deter theft. This to the components or design of an preliminary report to Congress on the conclusion is based on the information antitheft device. The significance of Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 and the GM provided on its ‘‘PASS-Key III’’ many such changes could be de

VerDate 06-MAY-99 13:35 Jun 01, 1999 Jkt 183247 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\A02JN3.144 pfrm01 PsN: 02JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 2, 1999 / Notices 29739 minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests for formulating U.S. financial and whether taxpayers comply with the cost that if the manufacturer contemplates monetary policies. allocation rules of section 263A and making any changes the effects of which Respondents: Business or other for- with the requirements for changing their might be characterized as de minimis, it profit. methods of accounting. The information should consult the agency before Estimated Number of Respondents: will be used to verify taxpayers’ changes preparing and submitting a petition to 475. in methods accounting. modify. Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondents: Business or others for- Respondent: 5 hours. profit, Farms. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of Frequency of Response: Monthly. authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Estimated Number of Respondents/ Estimated Total Reporting Burden: Recordkeepers: 20,000. Issued on: May 27, 1999. 28,500 hours. L. Robert Shelton, Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland Estimated Burden Hours Per Associate Administrator for Safety (202) 622–1563, Departmental Offices, Respondent/Recordkeeper: 5 hours. Performance Standards. Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, Frequency of Response: Other (in the [FR Doc. 99–13956 Filed 6–1–99; 8:45 am] NW, Washington, DC 20220. year of change). BILLING CODE 4910±59±P OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt Estimated Total Reporting/ (202) 395–7860, Office of Management Recordkeeping Burden: 100,000 hours. and Budget, Room 10202, New OMB Number: 1545–1496. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Executive Office Building, Washington, Regulation Project Number: REG– DC 20503. 209673–93 Final. Submission for OMB Review; Lois K. Holland, Type of Review: Extension. Comment Request Departmental Reports, Management Officer. Title: Mark to Market for Dealers in May 24, 1999. [FR Doc. 99–13863 Filed 6–1–99; 8:45 am] Securities. The Department of Treasury has BILLING CODE 4810±25±P Description: Under section 1.475(b)– submitted the following public 4, the information required to be information collection requirement(s) to recorded is required by the IRS to OMB for review and clearance under the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY determine whether exemption from Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, mark-to-market treatment is properly Submission for OMB Review; claimed, and will be used to make that Public Law 104–13. Copies of the Comment Request submission(s) may be obtained by determination upon audit of taxpayers’ calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance May 24, 1999. books and records. Also, under section Officer listed. Comments regarding this The Department of Treasury has 1.475(c)–1(a)(3)(iii), the information is information collection should be submitted the following public necessary for the Service to determine addressed to the OMB reviewer listed information collection requirement(s) to whether a consolidated group has and to the Treasury Department OMB for review and clearance under the elected to disregard inter-member Clearance Officer, Department of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. transactions in determining a member’s Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York L. 104–13. Copies of the submission(s) status as a dealer in securities. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. may be obtained by calling the Treasury Respondents: Business or other for- DATES: Written comments should be Bureau Clearance Officer listed. profit. received on or before July 2, 1999 to be Comments regarding this information Estimated Number of Respondents/ assured of consideration. collection should be addressed to the Recordkeepers: 3.400. OMB reviewer listed and to the Estimated Burden Hours Per Departmental Offices/International Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Respondent/Recordkeeper: 52 minutes. Portfolio Investment Data Systems Department of the Treasury, Room 2110, Frequency of Response: Annually. OMB Number: 1505–0001. 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Estimated Total Reporting/ Form Number: Treasury International Washington, DC 20220. Recordkeeping Burden: 63,360 hours. Capitol Form S. DATES: Written comments should be Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Type of Review: Extension. received on or before July 2, 1999 to be Internal Revenue Service, Room 5571, Title: Purchases and Sales of Long- assured of consideration. 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Term Securities by Foreigners. Washington, DC 20224 Description: Form S is required by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, law and is designed to collect timely OMB Number: 1545–0987. information on international portfolio (202) 395–7860, Office of Management Regulation Project Number: IA–62–91 and Budget, Room 10202, New capital movements, including Final and Temporary (formerly LR–168– foreigners’ purchases and sales of long- Executive Office Building, Washington, 86 NPRM and LR–129–86 Temporary). DC 20503. term securities in transactions with U.S. Type of Review: Extension. persons. This information is necessary Title: Capitalization and Inclusion in Lois K. Holland, for compiling the U.S. balance of Inventory of Certain Costs. Departmental Reports, Management Officer. payments, for calculating the U.S. Description: The paperwork [FR Doc. 99–13864 Filed 6–1–99; 8:45 am] international investment position, and requirements are necessary to determine BILLING CODE 4830±01±P

VerDate 06-MAY-99 13:35 Jun 01, 1999 Jkt 183247 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\A02JN3.145 pfrm01 PsN: 02JNN1