DOCSLIB.ORG

Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level ARTICLES Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level By Lawrence CONTEXT: Unintended pregnancy is a key reproductive health indicator, but rates have never been calculated for all B. Finer and 50 states. Kathryn Kost METHODS: State-level estimates of unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 were calculated using data from several sources. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies was obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Lawrence B. Finer is Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, and the intention status of pregnancies ending in abortion director of domestic research, and Kathryn from a national survey of abortion patients. These proportions were applied to birth and abortion counts for each Kost is senior research state, and fetal losses were estimated. Rates of unintended pregnancy were obtained by dividing relevant fi gures by associate, both at the the number of women aged 15–44 in each state. Six states and the District of Columbia had no appropriate survey Guttmacher Institute, data; their rates were predicted using multivariate linear regression. New York. RESULTS: In 2006, the median state unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44. Most rates fell within a range of 40–65 unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women. The highest rate was in Mississippi (69); the lowest rate was in New Hampshire (36). Rates were generally highest in the South and Southwest, and in states with large urban populations. In 29 states and the District of Columbia, more than half of pregnancies were unintended; in nine, a consistent upward trend in unintended pregnancy rates between 2002 and 2006 was apparent; no state had a consistent decline. CONCLUSIONS: These rates provide benchmarks for measuring the impact on unintended pregnancy of state policies and practices, such as those governing sex education and the funding of contraceptive services. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2011, 43(2):78–87, doi: 10.1363/4307811 The unintended pregnancy rate is one of the most impor- pregnancy, while black women were nearly three times as tant indicators of a population’s reproductive health. The likely as white women to do so.11 large majority of U.S. women and men want to plan their The dimensions of the problem have long been known pregnancies,1 and improving their ability to do so remains as a result of analyses that combined national-level data on a key goal of the national Healthy People initiative.2 In pregnancy intentions from the National Survey of Family addition, unplanned births have been associated with Growth (NSFG) with national data on births and abortion numerous undesirable outcomes, including inadequate or incidence. However, such estimates have not been calcu- delayed initiation of prenatal care, use of tobacco and alco- lated for each state. Because teenage pregnancy rates,12 hol during pregnancy, premature birth, low birth weight, abortion incidence rates and access to family planning ser- lack of breast-feeding, and negative physical and mental vices13 all vary widely by state, rates of unintended preg- health outcomes among children.3–9 Thus, reductions in nancy may vary as well, among both teenagers and adults. unintended pregnancy rates could have widespread posi- State-level data on unintended pregnancy rates would be tive effects on the health of Americans. highly useful to researchers, service providers, advocates The rate of unintended pregnancy fell nearly 20% and policymakers. For example, absent such rates, it is between the early 1980s and the mid-1990s,10 but it impossible to assess whether decreases in state abortion remained unchanged between 1994 and 2001.11 Although rates are driven by declines in unintended pregnancy rates rates continued to fall among higher income women (those or by other factors, such as harassment of women visiting with incomes at or above 200% of the federal poverty abortion clinics, state restrictions on abortion or public level) in 1994–2001, they rose among the poorest women opinion. Similarly, the lack of state data has hindered efforts (those below 100% of poverty); by 2001, a woman living to gauge the impact of state sex education policies and state- in poverty was four times as likely as a woman living at based efforts to reduce levels of unintended pregnancy, or 200% of poverty or higher to have an unintended preg- to compare levels of teenage pregnancy to overall levels nancy. In addition, racial disparities persisted during this of unintended pregnancy among all women in the state. period: In both 1994 and 2001, Hispanic women were Until recently, data on the intendedness of pregnan- twice as likely as white women to have an unintended cies resulting in births were available only for a limited 78 Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health number of states. However, as of 2007, some 39 juris- data from the closest available year—generally 2005 or dictions had joined the Pregnancy Risk Assessment 2007, though in a few cases it was necessary to use data Monitoring System (PRAMS).14 A surveillance project of from 2002 or 2003 (see appendix, page 84). the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and individual state health departments, PRAMS collects Pregnancy Outcomes state-specifi c, population-based data on maternal attitudes ᭹Births. PRAMS consists of annual surveys of state resi- (including pregnancy intentions) and experiences before, dents who have given birth in the state; the data can be during and shortly after a birth. In addition, seven states weighted to represent all births in the state for the year of have instituted similar surveys. These newly available data the survey. PRAMS surveys were conducted in 31 states in on births, combined with the most complete state-level 2002, in 29 states in 2004, in 28 states in 2006 and in 36 data on abortions, make it possible to estimate unintended states in 2007. In addition, two PRAMS surveys were con- pregnancy rates for all 50 states—the task we undertook ducted in New York—one for New York City and one for in this analysis. the rest of the state—and one was administered among Native American women in South Dakota in 2007. METHODS Other states have (or have recently had) survey pro- Measures grams that are based on or similar to PRAMS and include In this article, a pregnancy is considered unintended if the questions on pregnancy intention. The Pregnancy Risk woman reported that it was mistimed (i.e., she had wanted Assessment Tracking System has been administered to become pregnant, but at a later date) or unwanted (i.e., annually in Idaho since 200131 and was administered she had not wanted to become pregnant then or at any in Connecticut in 2002 and 2003.32 In Wyoming, the time). Intended pregnancies are those that occurred either Maternal Outcomes Measurement System, based on at the time the woman had desired or later. PRAMS, conducted surveys in 2003, 2004 and 2005.33 The inadequacy of this traditional, demographically In California, Maternal and Infant Health Assessment sur- oriented measure of pregnancy intentions and the need veys have collected similar data annually since 2000.34 for more nuanced measures have been widely noted.15–27 In Iowa, the annual Barriers to Prenatal Care survey has For example, a pregnancy classifi ed as unintended may included questions on the intention status of births since have been unexpected and unplanned, but not necessarily 1991.35 The Perinatal Risk Assessment survey has been unwelcome or unwanted. In addition, mistimed pregnan- conducted every two years in South Dakota beginning cies include those that occurred only a little too soon or in 1997, including in 2003, 2005 and 2007.36 Finally, much too soon, and the extent of mistiming appears to be Kentucky began conducting a PRAMS-based survey in an important predictor of maternal behaviors and child 2007.37 health outcomes.28,29 However, although other research Using intention status data from the jurisdictions that and data collection are under way to refi ne measures of carried out at least one round of a PRAMS or similar sur- pregnancy intention, the PRAMS data available for this vey, we were able to directly estimate rates of unintended analysis include only the more limited, traditional mea- pregnancy for 44 states. (We indirectly predicted rates for sure of intention status. the remaining six states and the District of Columbia) For The unintended pregnancy rate for a state is defi ned as each available state, we tabulated the proportion of births the number of such pregnancies per 1,000 women aged that were unintended (and the proportions mistimed 15 –44 residing in the state. Similarly, the intended preg- and unwanted).* These proportions were applied to the nancy rate is the number of intended pregnancies divided total number of births reported for the state in U.S. vital by the same population. Population denominators by age, statistics.38–40 race and ethnic group for each state are based on popu- In some states, the PRAMS survey response rate was lation estimates calculated by the National Center for lower than 70%, the cutoff used by the CDC for inclusion Health Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau.30 In addition in publicly disseminated fi ndings. Estimates from surveys to these rates, we examine the proportion of all pregnan- with lower-than-optimal response rates can be greatly cies among residents of the state that were unintended. affected by slight variations in the composition of the sam- We also assess the proportions of unintended pregnancies ple. We were cautious in including estimates from surveys that were mistimed and unwanted, as well as the propor- with response rates below 70%. However, for some states, tions ending in birth, abortion and fetal loss (including the only data available on intention status of births came miscarriages).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unintended Pregnancy Prevention: Home
    Home About CDC Press Room A-Z Index Contact Us CDC en Español Search: Unintended Pregnancy Prevention: Home Home Unintended Pregnancy Contraception Medical Eligibility An unintended pregnancy is a pregnancy that is either mistimed or Criteria unwanted at the time of conception. It is a core concept in understanding Female Sterilization the fertility of populations and the unmet need for contraception. Vasectomy Unintended pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of morbidity for women, and with health behaviors during pregnancy that are associated with adverse effects. For example, women with an unintended pregnancy may delay prenatal care, which may affect the health of the infant. Women of all ages may have unintended pregnancies, but some groups, such as teens, are at a higher risk. Reproductive Health In 2001, approximately one-half of pregnancies in the United States were Home unintended (Finer 2006, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Data and Statistics Health), and the United States has set a national goal of decreasing Publications and unintended pregnancies to 30% by 2010. Products Glossary Efforts to decrease unintended pregnancy include finding better forms of contraception, and Related Links increasing contraceptive use and adherence. Research has also focused on better understanding pregnancy intention and how it is measured. As one study suggests, “A better understanding of the Adolescent Reproductive multiple dimensions of unintended pregnancy also may lead to a better understanding of the Health consequences of these pregnancies” (Santelli 2003, The Measurement and Meaning of Unintended Assisted Reproductive Pregnancy* ). Technology Global Reproductive Health Selected Resources Maternal and Infant Health Refugee Reproductive Adolescent Reproductive Health Health When teens give birth, their future prospects decline.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Supplementary Table S2. Summary of the Results of Systematic Literature
    Supplementary Table S2. Summary of the results of systematic literature review Question 1. What is the evidence that the following pre-conception (planned versus unintended pregnancy, disease activity and damage, antibody profile, lupus medications, management of flares, access to specialist services, immunization status and update) and post-conception/delivery (parenting issues, lupus medications, management of flares, access to specialist care) factors influence maternal and foetal outcomes, and thus, should be considered in pregnancy risk stratification and counselling in women with SLE or APS? 1. Women with SLE 1.1. Pre-conception factors associated maternal outcomes Factor/predictor Outcome(s) and example(s) of effect size Best study References design1 Active/flaring SLE (before Active/flaring SLE during pregnancy. SLE flares during the pre-gestation period had OR 4 1-21 or at conception) 5.1 for flare during pregnancy; previous (within 6 months before conception) organ involvement predicted same organ involvement during pregnancy (especially haematological, renal, skin, serological activity); SLE flares during the pre-gestation period had OR 5.1 for development of flare during pregnancy; SLEDAI ≥4 at conception had sensitivity 64% and specificity 75% for SLE exacerbation during pregnancy; remission during the 6-month period prior to conception is associated with lower odds for flare during pregnancy Organ damage. Pre-gestational SLE activity (SLAM-R index) correlates with post-partum 5 22 damage accrual Pregnancy-induced hypertension, (pre-)eclampsia/HELLP. Positive correlation with 4 12 14 21 23 pre-conception SLEDAI; active SLE within 4 months before conception was associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension (25% versus 11%) Adverse maternal outcome (composite outcome or death).
    [Show full text]
  • Pregnancy Intention and Utilization of Maternal And
    Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi, 9(1), 2018: 27-36 DOI: 10.22435/kespro.v9i1.891.27-36 PREGNANCY INTENTION AND UTILIZATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN INDONESIA Ika Saptarini1,2,*, Diahhadi Setyonaluri1 1Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia 2National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Indonesia Submitted 31 May 2018; reviewed 3 June 2018; approved 30 June 2018 Abstrak Latar belakang: Antenatal care, persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan, postnatal care serta imunisasi lengkap membantu meningkatkan kesehatan ibu dan anak. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara perencanaan kehamilan dan pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan ibu dan anak. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan data dari Survei Kesehatan Demografi Indonesia 2012. Empat model regresi digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan antara perencanaan kehamilan dan pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan ibu dan anak. Hasil: Lebih dari seperlima (25,5%) responden menerima kelima jenis perawatan ibu dan anak. Lima belas persen wanita melaporkan bahwa kehamilan terakhir mereka tidak diinginkan. Perencanaan kehamilan berhubungan secara bermakna dengan penggunaan antenatal care yang memadai (OR: 0,53, 95% CI, 0,46-0,60), pemanfaatan antenatal care dan persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan (OR: 0,62, 95% CI, 0,55-0,71), pemanfaatan antenatal care, persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan dan postnatal care ( OR: 0,82, 95% CI, 0,72-0,93), namun tidak berhubungan secara signifikan dengan pemanfaatan antenatal care, persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan, postnatal care hingga imunisasi lengkap (OR: 1,06, 95% CI, 0,91-1,22) setelah dikontrol menggunakan variabel sosiodemografi dan faktor obstetrik. Kesimpulan: Intervensi diperlukan untuk mengurangi kehamilan yang tidak diinginkan seperti meningkatkan akses ke layanan keluarga berencana.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Unplanned Pregnancy: Lessons from the States
    JUNE 2019 Preventing Unplanned Pregnancy: Lessons from the States Isabel V. Sawhill Katherine Guyot Executive Summary In the context of a looming debate about women’s reproductive health, this paper reviews what we have learned about strategies for reducing unplanned pregnancies and births, especially at the state level. Our primary findings and conclusions are: • Unintended pregnancies are at an all-time low in the U.S. but still represent about 45% of all pregnancies. (Unintended pregnancies include those that women themselves say they did not want or that occurred earlier than they desired. We use “unintended” and “unplanned” interchangeably in this paper.) • About 40% of unplanned pregnancies end in abortion, while the other 60% result in a birth. The result is that about one-third of all births are unplanned. • Unintended pregnancies and births are most common among young unmarried women, especially teens and the most disadvantaged. However, these groups have also seen the largest declines in unintended pregnancy rates in recent years. • The reasons behind these declines remain somewhat obscure, but two potential reasons stand out. The first is changes in social norms around women’s roles, with more women expected to work, to get some postsecondary education, and to support their families, making unplanned childbearing more costly and the benefits of delay much greater. The second reason is greater access to and use of the most effective forms of contraception, such as long-acting reversible contraceptives. Other factors that could have played a role include the Great Recession and a decline in sexual activity. • Low-income women tend to have the least access to contraception through employer- sponsored health insurance, and many rely on publicly subsidized family planning services.
    [Show full text]
  • Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion in the USA: Epidemiology and Public Health Impact
    BLBK137-Paul February 13, 2009 13:25 CHAPTER 3 3 Unintended pregnancy and abortion in the USA: Epidemiology and public health impact Stanley K. Henshaw, PhD LEARNING POINTS r Unintended pregnancy occurs frequently in the USA, especially among women who are young, have low income, are Black or Hispanic, or have had a prior unintended pregnancy. r Unintended pregnancy and abortion result about equally from non-use of contraception and imperfect use, which in turn are related to chance-taking, problems with contraceptive methods, not expecting to have sex, and barriers to access to contraception. r Women with unwanted pregnancies have many reasons for choosing abortion, the most common of which are inadequate finances, lack of partner support, desire to continue education or career, not wanting more children, and feeling too immature. r The US abortion rate has been falling in recent years, especially among teenagers. r Although repeat abortion is often a source of concern, the data provide no justification for prejudicial attitudes. Guttmacher Institute were considered to result from unin- Introduction tended pregnancies, as were 35% of births, as reported in Couples in all developed countries want to control the the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) [2]. A timing and number of their children. Women typically pregnancy is considered to be unintended if the woman says initiate sexual activity long before they want children that at the time she became pregnant she wanted no more and continue long after they have their desired number, children or did not want to become pregnant until later. leaving them to rely on contraception during the majority Many unintended pregnancies come to be wanted, and of their reproductive lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Family Planning
    Benefits Of Family Planning Adrien often deserve unprincely when eventual Wilhelm travelling unpriestly and yawps her axillary. How fatherless is Ricard when resumptive and consummative Randy misdescribed some appendant? Is Clifton always toric and haematogenous when exsects some pokeweed very pluckily and unartfully? Family planning programs is the state and support have such as well as sexually active for the powr logo from sterilization and reproductive health to economic crisis. The family planning in uganda and improving contraceptive. For today is being made the sustainable development, although family planning mainly among the benefits of political violence is immediately reversible methods of another. It means of these broad search form of a state level of unwanted. Within and children per women in place for best birth spacing babies, as the alternative to move to afford. Healthy life of family planning and flirty, endometrial and achieve lower. Family planning benefits, family planning saves the planned. Once this is family planning found no boundaries between family planning benefits of family planning services in developing countries stand up the evidence of fp use reliable contraception advances in st fleur j matsiko and interpretation. And plan b emergency contraception in iran to apply to implement its role of planning advances the gap. You need family planning benefits broker will promote development and families experience on effectiveness in. Fda approval for them after having children is most data suggest that two to plan or after the population remains a number of birth spacing and health. At clinics provide appropriate for families. While improving maternal health information and that messages are: the people from the knowledge management and their children can reduce the planning benefits of family planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in the Philippines
    Unintended Pregnancy And Induced Abortion In the Philippines CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES Unintended Pregnancy And Induced Abortion In the Philippines: Causes and Consequences Susheela Singh Fatima Juarez Josefina Cabigon Haley Ball Rubina Hussain Jennifer Nadeau Acknowledgments Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in the Philippines; Alfredo Tadiar (retired), College of Law and Philippines: Causes and Consequences was written by College of Medicine, University of the Philippines; and Susheela Singh, Haley Ball, Rubina Hussain and Jennifer Cecille Tomas, College of Medicine, University of the Nadeau, all of the Guttmacher Institute; Fatima Juarez, Philippines. Centre for Demographic, Urban and Environmental The contributions of a stakeholders’ forum were essential Studies, El Colegio de México, and independent consult- to determining the scope and direction of the report. The ant; and Josefina Cabigon, University of the Philippines following participants offered their input and advice: Population Institute. The report was edited by Susan Merlita Awit, Women’s Health Care Foundation; Hope London, independent consultant. Kathleen Randall, of the Basiao-Abella, WomenLead Foundation; Ellen Bautista, Guttmacher Institute, supervised production of the report. EngenderHealth; Kalayaan Pulido Constantino, PLCPD; The authors thank the following current and former Jonathan A. Flavier, Cooperative Movement for Guttmacher Institute staff members for providing assis- Encouraging NSV (CMEN); Gladys Malayang, Health and tance at various stages of the report’s preparation: Development Institute; Alexandrina Marcelo, Reproductive Akinrinola Bankole, Erin Carbone, Melanie Croce-Galis, Rights Resource Group (3RG); Junice Melgar, Linangan ng Patricia Donovan, Dore Hollander, Sandhya Ramashwar Kababaihan (Likhaan); Sharon Anne B. Pangilinan, and Jennifer Swedish. The authors also acknowledge the Institute for Social Science and Action; Glenn Paraso, contributions of the following colleagues at the University Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement; Corazon M.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRACEPTION University of Miami Student Health Service (305) 284-9100 [email protected] Appointments/Results: Myuhealthchart.Com
    INFORMATION ON HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION University of Miami Student Health Service (305) 284-9100 [email protected] www.miami.edu/student-health Appointments/results: myuhealthchart.com BIRTH CONTROL PILLS: When used correctly and consistently, birth control pills are one of the most effective means available for prevention of pregnancy. Although no method is 100% effective, with proper use the pregnancy rate is considerably less than 1%. The information below is intended as a supplement to the package insert that accompanies your birth control pills, and serves to answer the most frequently asked questions. Be sure to also read the package insert, which contains more complete information, and to discuss additional concerns and special situations with your health care provider. Please read this information completely and save for future reference. WARNING: Smoking and the use of hormonal contraceptives are not recommended, especially in women over age 35. If you smoke you should stop. Talk to your health care provider if you need help quitting. Birth control pills do not protect you from getting sexually transmitted infections. We advise you to use CONDOMS as additional protection against unintended pregnancy and as protection against sexually transmitted infections. Although condoms do not provide complete protection, if used properly, they can decrease the likelihood of contracting an STD. Options for starting the pill: Most Common Method: Quick Start: If you are absolutely certain you’re not pregnant, you can start the pill now and use back-up contraception (i.e. condoms) for at least 7 days. Alternative Methods: Day 1 Start: Start pills on first day of a normal menstrual cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Teenage Pregnancy
    REDUCING TEENAGE PREGNANCY Although the rate of teenage pregnancy in the United In 2009, recognizing that evidence-based sex States is at its lowest level in nearly 40 years, it education programs were effective in promoting remains one of the highest among the most developed sexual health among teenagers, the Obama countries in the world. Approximately 57.4 per 1,000 administration transferred funds from the women aged 15–19 — nearly 615,000 American Community-based Abstinence Education Program teenagers — become pregnant each year (Kost and and budgeted $114.5 million to support evidence- Henshaw, 2014). The majority of these pregnancies — based sex education programs across the country. 82 percent — are unintended (Finer & Zolna, 2014). The bulk of the funds — $75 million — was set aside for replicating evidence-based programs that Moreover, because the average age of menarche have been shown to reduce teen pregnancy and its has reached an all-time low of about 12 or 13 years underlying or associated risk factors. The balance old (Potts, 1990), and because six out of 10 young was set aside for developing promising strategies, women have sex as teenagers (Martinez et al., 2011), technical assistance, evaluation, outreach, and most teenage girls are at risk of becoming pregnant. program support (Boonstra, 2010). This was the The consequences of adolescent pregnancy and first time federal monies were appropriated for more childbearing are serious and numerous: comprehensive sex education programs (SIECUS, n.d.). • Pregnant teenagers are more likely than women Though off to a good start, none of these initiatives who delay childbearing to experience maternal can succeed without a general reassessment of the illness, miscarriage, stillbirth, and neonatal death attitudes and mores regarding adolescent sexuality (Luker, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Background & Significance
    Background & Significance: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Rachel Rapkin, MD, MPH 1 2 Unplanned Pregnancies Unintended pregnancy rate, 2011 (number of unintended pregnancies per 1,000 women aged 15-44) Guttmacher.org 3 Unplanned Pregnancies Approximately 45% of all pregnancies and 75% of teen pregnancies are unintended in the U.S. In 2010, Florida’s unintended pregnancy rate was 59% In one study of opioid using pregnant women, almost 9 out of 10 pregnancies were unintended. 4 Unplanned Pregnancies (con’t) The total public costs for unintended pregnancies in 2010 was $1.3 billion. This equates to $371 per woman aged 15-44 in Florida, compared with $201 per woman nationally. 5 Consequences of Unplanned Pregnancies The consequences of unintended pregnancy include: Poor pregnancy outcomes (i.e., low birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age) Delayed initiation of prenatal care Lower breastfeeding rates Higher risk of maternal depression and potential future child maltreatment 6 Consequences of Short Interpregnancy Interval Interpregnancy interval is defined as the time between the delivery date of the previous birth and the conception date of the current pregnancy. Short interpregnancy interval, pregnancy occurring less than 18 months from a previous delivery, is associated with poor maternal and infant outcomes, including preterm birth, low birthweight and preeclampsia. 7 Short Interpregnancy Interval Between 40 and 57% of women resume sexual activity before their postpartum check-up Up to 40% of women do not return for their 6-week postpartum visit 40-75% of women who plan to use an IUD postpartum do not obtain it At least 70% of pregnancies in the first year postpartum are unintended 8 FloridaCHARTS 9 CONTRACEPTIVE OPTIONS 10 Contraceptive Options 11 Why LARC? What percent of women get pregnant in a year using a birth control method? .
    [Show full text]
  • Unintended Pregnancy
    PRAMS Unintended Pregnancy Fact Sheet Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Data Highlights Importance of Pregnancy Intention • About 45% of all pregnancies in Hawai‘i were When pregnancies are intended and planned, there unintended (13% unwanted and 32% mistimed) is greater opportunity and motivation for women and • Women more likely to have an unintended their partners to adopt or maintain positive health pregnancy were Other Pacific Islander, Samoan, behaviors, often leading to improved birth and infant Black, Hawaiian, Filipino or Hispanic, younger, less 1 outcomes. Pregnancies that are unintended are more educated, unmarried, uninsured or Medicaid/QUEST likely to result in adverse health behaviors and outcomes insured, and lived in Hawai‘i County before, during, and after pregnancy.1 The National Healthy People 2010 objective was to increase the • Unintended pregnancy was related to adverse proportion of intended pregnancies to 70%. health behaviors including late or no prenatal care, substance use, never breastfeeding, postpartum Pregnancy Intention, Hawai‘i PRAMS 2004-2008 depression, and short birth intervals • About half of those with an unintended pregnancy reported not using contraception when they became pregnant Unintended Maternal Characteristics Related to Unintended 45% Pregnancy Intended In Hawai‘i, women who were more likely to have an 55% unintended pregnancy were Other Pacific Islander Samoan, Black, Hawaiian, Filipino, or Hispanic, younger in age, less educated, unmarried, of higher parity, had Medicaid/QUEST insurance or were uninsured before Pregnancy Intention pregnancy, and lived in Hawai‘i County. Within the An estimated 55% of all pregnancies resulting in a subcategories of unintended pregnancies, a mistimed live birth were intended as defined by wanting the was particularly common among those under 20 years pregnancy at the time of occurrence or sooner.
    [Show full text]
  • Unintended Pregnancy Fact Sheet Wyoming, 2012-2015 2 0 1 8 Unintended Pregnancy
    Unintended Pregnancy Fact Sheet Wyoming, 2012-2015 2 0 1 8 Unintended Pregnancy Unintended pregnancy is Fast Facts: defined by the Centers for Figure 1. Proportion of pregnancies that were unintended among Wyoming women. WY PRAMS 2007-2015* Data from 2012 Disease Control and - 2015 report Prevention (CDC) as a Unintended Unsure that about one mistimed, unplanned, or 60 third (31%) of unwanted pregnancy at the births in time of conception.1 50 Wyoming 16.6 14.2 44.4 16.2 16.1 during this The Guttmacher Institute 40 42.4 period were the 40.2 estimates that in 2010, 37.3 36.0 30 result of an unintended pregnancy cost 33.1 33.0 unintended 29.1 29.6 pregnancy. US tax payers $ 21 billion Percent Unintended 20 dollars, or $ 336 per 10 - - - - - women age 15-44, in the country. In Wyoming, the 0 Unintended 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012* 2013* 2014* 2015* pregnancy cost total cost (2010) was US taxpayers estimated to be $ 21.3 Year $ 21 billion in million, or $ 519 per * In 2012, the WY PRAMS survey question regarding pregnancy intendedness added the 2010. In woman.2 option “Unsure”. Data from 2007-2012 are not comparable to data from 2012 and later. Wyoming The Healthy People 2020 (2010), an Maternal CDC Recommendations1 estimated 3 target for the nation is to 4 $ 21.3 million Characteristics increase the proportion of The CDC recommends women could have been pregnancies that are intend- A number of characteristics of reproductive age prevent saved if all pregnancies ed from 51.0% (2002) to are associated with unintended pregnancy by: unintended pregnancies on during that 56.0% (2020).
    [Show full text]