Journal of Architectural Education

Fall Editorial Board Meeting

ACSA Washington, DC September 19-20, 2014

Table of Contents

General Information ...... 1

Meeting Schedule ...... 2

Meeting Agenda ...... 3

Reports

Executive Editor ...... 4

Associate Editor, Design ...... 5

Associate Editor, Reviews ...... 6

Associate Editor, Reviews ...... 7

Additional Material

Spring 2014 Board Meeting Minutes

68:2 table of contents

Author Guide (Draft)

Editorial Production Manager description

HenkelHiedl proposal

JAE Award essays

General Information

Welcome to the Journal of Architectural Education 2014 Fall Editorial Board Meeting. All of our meetings will occur at the ACSA Headquarters: (1735 New York Avenue, NW · Washington, DC 20006 | Phone: 202.785.2324)

Internet access will be available during meetings. If you are unable to attend the meeting, a skype connection can be provided. Please email Marc Neveu ([email protected]) if you wish to participate via skype.

While in Washington, Marc Neveu may be reached by phone at: 617-899-6965.

Monti Residence: (1116 C Street SE in the Eastern Market/Capitol Hill neighborhood)

1 Meeting Schedule

Friday, 19 September 6:30 pm Cocktail Hour at Monti’s 1116 C Street SE (Eastern Market is closest Metro) Phone: 202-277-5719

Saturday, 20 September 9:00 – 12:30 Design Committee Meeting ACSA Headquarters Kulper, La, Sprecher, Theodore, Jackson, Fujita, Wendl

9:00 – 12:30 Reviews Committee Meeting ACSA Headquarters Rupnik, Mumford, Avermaete, Neveu, Singley, Sabatino

1:30 – 5:00 Editorial Board Meeting ACSA Headquarters Editorial Board, Monti, Vonier, Criss

7:30 Dinner at Darlington House 1610 20th St. NW (Dupont Circle is closest Metro)

Sunday, 21 September

9:00 – 12:00 Editorial Board Meeting ACSA Headquarters Editorial Board, Monti, Vonier, Criss

2 General Board Meeting Agenda

Saturday, 20 September Action Call to Order Neveu 1:30

Approval of Agenda Neveu 1:35 Approve Agenda

Approval of Fall 2013 Minutes Neveu 1:40 Approve Minutes

Executive Editor Report Neveu 1:45

Associate Editor, Design Report Kulper 2:00

Associate Editor, Reviews Report Sabatino 2:15

Senior Managing Editor Report Vonier 2:30

Break

Best Article (SoD, DaS), discussion Neveu 3:00 Best Article, vote

Adjournment 5:00

Sunday, 21 September Action Call to Order Neveu 9:00

Web Proposals, discussion Vonier 9:05 Select Firm

Author Guide, discussion Neveu 9:30 Approve Guide

Theme selection, discussion Neveu 10:00

Editorial Board Member selection process Neveu 10:30 Approve Process

Additional Business all 11:00

Adjournment 5:00

3 Executive Editor Report

Since the previous Editorial Board meeting in Spring 2014, I have focused on the production of the forthcoming issue, 68:2 edited with David Rifkind and Itohan Osayimwese. Work for the upcoming issue, 69:1 Crisis, with Theme Editor Timothy Hyde is ongoing.

68:2 – Building Modern Africa (October 2014) David Rifkind of Florida International University and Itohan Osayimwese of Brown University are the Theme Editors for issue 68:2. The issue is being printed and the table of contents is enclosed for your review.

69:1 – Crisis (March 2015) Timothy Hyde from MIT is the theme editor for the next issue. We have already received a robust selection of essays for the issue. Decisions will be made after the fall Board Meeting. Timothy has organized two Opinion essays as well as a series of book reviews.

69:1 – s,m,l,xl (October 2015) This issue will coincide with the 25th anniversary of the publication of s,m,l,xl. A poster to advertise 69:1 is in production and will be sent out to ACSA member schools in January 2015.

69:2 (March 2016) This issue will be a non-themed issue.

Associate Editor, Design I have nominated Amy Kulper to continue as Associate Editor, Design for 2014-15.

Associate Editor, Reviews I have nominated Ivan Rupnik as Associate Editor, Reviews for 2014-15.

Online, ad-hoc committee John Stuart, Georgeen Theodore and I met over the summer to discuss ways to improve the JAE website. Suggestions were forwarded to the ACSA with the intention that the suggestions be folded into a larger proposal to rework the ACSA website.

Author Guide, ad-hoc committee Franca Trubiano and I have continued to edit a new Author Guide. (attached)

4 Associate Editor, Design: Report

There was a robust response to the CFP for issue 69:1, Crisis, with twenty Scholarship of Design (SoD) submissions, and three Micro-Narrative submissions. Overall, the submissions are of a higher quality than those in previous issues, suggesting that a well- crafted call for a given theme with well-respected theme editors garners better yields, and hopefully, higher quality issues.

In conversation with Timothy Hyde, the Theme Editor, the design framework Crossings: Interdisciplinary Research was selected, and invitations were issued to Hilary Sample, of Columbia University GSAPP, and Jenny Sabin, of Cornell University AAP to act as Guest Curators for the issue. Additionally, we will be exploring the possibility of a JAE website teaser for the issue, featuring the work of Ed Mitchell.

As a result of a discussion among the members of the Design Committee at the last meeting, it was decided to change the name of the ‘Pre-Fabrications’ column to ‘Micro- Narratives.’ In general, the members of the committee felt that the title was misleading and promised a different content from what we were actually seeking. In conversation with Marc, we decided to inflect the call for Micro-Narratives towards the selected theme, and post a slightly altered version on the website with each issue. This approach is still not yielding significant returns, so we need to revisit the question of how to get the best content in the ‘Micro-Narratives’ column. Strategies under consideration might include: o Allowing the theme editors to solicit one Micro-Narrative each issue, anticipating an average of three per issue. o Allowing the Design Committee to solicit this content (typically three very short essays at 1,500 words maximum) in conversation with the theme editor. o Draft a list of possible ‘Micro-Narratives’ contributors at the end of each bi- annual meeting, and send emails to encourage those identified to contribute.

Given that the Design Frameworks, the Guest Curators, and the Micro-Narratives are all now successfully up and running (these features appeared in issues 67:2, 68:1, and 68:2), the Design Committee has now turned its attention to the next most pressing issue, how to effectively curate a web-presence for design content. The final portion of the Design Committee meeting will consider this issue, and we will attempt to bring some ideas and action items to the larger board. In the meantime, we will be seeking feedback and suggestions for possible improvement on the Guest Curator and Micro-Narrative features, and will solicit newly emerging design frameworks from the board members.

5 Associate Editor, Reviews: Report

Journal of Architectural Education – Reviews (Print & Online) Fall Activity Report – 2014 (Issues 69:1, 69:2 + Online)

Dear Marc and JAE Editorial Board Members –

It has been a busy summer for print and online reviews. For the JAE issue 69:1 (guest edited by Timothy Hyde), I commissioned a total of 21 reviews. The reviews cover a wide range of formats and content. Before stepping down as Reviews Editor I commissioned approximately 22 reviews for the upcoming JAE issue 69:2. Over the summer we posted 5 online reviews of mainly exhibitions. (Thanks are due to Pascale Vonier for her assistance).

It has been a true pleasure to serve as Reviews Editor for the JAE. I am very confidant that our colleague Ivan Rupnik will do an excellent job as the new Reviews Editor!

Cordially,

Michelangelo Sabatino, Ph.D., Professor and Director of the PhD Program in Architecture Illinois Institute of Technology, College of Architecture

6 Managing Editor: Report

JAE Online Since last fall, online reviews have received over 5,000 views. In June, JAE established its own social media presence on Facebook and Twitter.

NEA Grant In 2011, JAE received a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts to “support the digital Journal of Architectural Education. In order to fulfill the grant, and to meet our December 2014 deadline, I have spoken to a variety of firms to design wireframes and prototypes for development and deployment in 2015.

The outlined goal of the project is to “provide a digital infrastructure for the production and dissemination of architectural scholarship and design experimentation via interactive functionality that will reach new audiences with scholarly publications in design.” The new web platform would house articles, video, images galleries, blogs, archives of back issues, and be a space for sharing commentary on architectural scholarship and design experimentation, either with in-article annotation or other innovative collaboration concepts. The goal is to have great ideas and solid prototypes to bring to developers. Below are the design firms that have expressed interest in working with us within our budget:

Project Projects (projectprojects.com) $9,000.00 + reimbursables Project Projects designed the new look of the JAE, starting with 68:1. They are keen to help us translate the new design online. Their web clients include Pew Center for Arts & Heritage, http://www.pcah.us/.

ProjectBuro HenkelHiedl (henkelhiedl.com) $7,800+ reimbursables They are very interested in partnering with us and their work on uncubed magazine gives them an edge in terms of understanding how to translate journals to online platforms.

Both Project Projects and HenkelHiedl do development as well, but I spoke with another firm in Berlin that focuses entirely on development and they have a rather sophisticated body of work.

Systemantics (systemantics.net) cost not yet known They previously worked with Project Projects to develop the Pew site (http://www.pcah.us). They would be able to develop the site based on our wireframes and prototypes, and depending on the complexity, would be able to do it in the $5-7,000 range. If we decide to work with them, they would like to be brought in early on in the discussions with our designers. They estimate that building the site after the design work would take three months, giving us the target launch date of March 2015.

7 Additional Material

JAE Board Meeting ACSA National Conference in Miami – Spring 2014

Saturday April 12, 14 Meeting Minutes Prepared by Franca Trubiano

In attendance: Marc Neveu (Executive Editor - MN) Amy Kulper (AK) Aaron Sprecher (AS) Sheila Crane (SC) Grace La (GL) Georgeen Theodore (GT) John Stuart (JS) Ivan Rupnik (IR) Marshall Brown (MB) Franca Trubiano (FT)

Pascale Vonier (PV from ACSA, Senior Managing Editor) Michael Monti (MM from ACSA, Executive Director) Claire Cusack (CC from Taylor & Francis)

Absent Mason White Kevin Mitchell Murray Fraser Christina Contandriopoulos Nicholas de Monchaux Tom Avermaete Michelangelo Sabatino

See Board Guide emailed Thursday April 10, 2014

ACTION To approve the Meeting Agenda supplied by MN. Motion made by GL Seconded by MB ALL In Favor

1

ACTION To approve Minutes from the Fall 2013 meeting at Penn DESIGN Motion made by GL Seconded by AS ALL in Favor

1.0 Report from the Executive Editor ( MN )

68.1 DESIGN + is out and it has been mailed to all schools. ( MN ) is asking the Board for comments and reactions.

68.2 Themed Edition on Africa is in the Queue; 11 articles on Design were received and the remainder received are in the Scholarship category.

Reminder of Board members who are cycling out on June 30th, . This list includes; Mason White, Nicholas de Monchaux, Sheila Crane Marshall Brown

A short list of prospective Board Members has been sent to the ACSA for review and for sending out invitations.

MB recommended that we make sure that Landscape is considered as a sector not to be forgotten when selecting Board Members.

JAE session at ACSA 2015 – Toronto (IR) agreed to run the session and to have it focused on the upcoming issue - “Crisis.“ (AS) also showed interest in helping with the organization of this session.

Author Guide • (MN) is working a web located Author Guide that instructs in submissions guidelines and offers a template. • (FT) will give MN a hand in its production. • (MB) recommended making a video to communicate this information • Could we publish the evaluation sheet rubric for authors to study? • Could we outline what we don’t want from the submissions? • (AK) noted that the Design Committee could also offer a “service” in which they would evaluate design articles early on to offer guidance to authors.

2

2.1 Report from the DESIGN - Associate Editor ( AK )

AK was pleased with the most recent submissions, which were the subject of the separate Design session meeting on Saturday afternoon of the ACSA conference.

• 11 design submissions • 3 scholarship manuscripts have come in and one is arriving this week • 2 are for the Pre-fabrications Sections whose guest Curators could be Joe Neoro and/ or Jane Harrison and Dave Turnbull of Atopia • Grace asked where would the Design Frameworks – appear given the introduction of the Author Guide on the WEB.

We discussed revisions to how the website works for the DESIGN submission process. Could the website include a set of descriptions of the people involved in editing and curating and the different peer review issues?

3.1 Report form the Reviews Associate Editor ( MS)

MS was not at the meeting, but pertinent info was shared by MN.

• 11 reviews are now on line, and these cover mostly the subject of exhibits. • The web site offers a timelier framework for communicating this information. • MS is in contact with Timothy ( from Harvard ) and he has done 15 reviews for 68.1. He is working with David and Itohan on the next issues. • The Reviews will be of a mixed type because Michelangelo has already solicited them. • Putting up one or two per month is the goal • Mark asked John to help with this. • Have a look at the reviews – let MS know of suggestions – do not review the exhibits that you are in. • Amy asked whether these reviews have a Curatorial approach or whether we are aiming mostly for Quantity.

NB. As communicated by (MN) what is published in the Reviews in not part of Taylor Francis and will not be part of JSTOR. Should this be communicated to the general readership of JAE

3 4.1 Report from Senior Managing Editor, ( PV )

PV is tracking statistics on the web site . • 1500 people have read the reviews – which is 25 % of those that come to the page, • Since February the traffic has doubled to the web site .

Layout comments about the new issue • Comment about the first in-fold sheet that seems to filled with content – could some more light and white be brought to this first page • 164 pages / issue this is the maximum for the printing of the journal from T & F • the photographs are of less quality.

The JAE Award The decision is now back at the BOARD level – Monti has agreed that we should own the award and we will make a statement about the new protocol

FIRST DISCUSSION ITEM

1.1 Themed Content vs Non Themed Content

Background Albeit we know we have themes for the next issues, we have not decided what is content that is themed and what is not.

Regarding the content that is not theme based (15 articles have been received) what to do with all these issues? How does this get curated and decided upon?

The ACSA publication committee does not think that we should only have themed issues.

Marc suggests that if we have a general OPEN call issue – then someone on the Board should own that issue.

How to engage constituencies that are not represented?

We had a General Non Themed Issue with 67.2 Frascari • Three themed issues are to follow • The next one, thereafter, might it be a general OPEN call issue?

Larger question: should we have a set cycle of Themed to Non-Themed issues? lf we go two (themed) and one ( general ) - This is the consensus.

4 If papers are not selected during a Themed issues, because they do not follow the theme – they will be rejected.

ACTION That JAE will cycle through publishing two themed issues and one OPEN call issue – giving the Executive Editor the right to Reject any Papers that do meet the criteria for Themed issues. Motion made by (AK) Seconded by ( MB) ALL in Favor

2.1 Review of Proposal for the Themed Issue

The Board was asked by Executive Editor ( MN) to table the discussion about the Themed issued Proposal which was made by ( FT ) on the subject of Building Technology.

• ( AS) asked whether the General OPEN Call should have a structure that is recurrent and consistent.

• ( GL) recommended the guidelines from the Design Frameworks where the techniques and the interdisciplinary committee are identified .

• ( MN) asked FT to communicate that the JAE is interested in receiving papers from the BTES constituency in as much as their work is interested in the question of “CRISIS”.

• Conversation was had regarding whether the General Open call issues could have mini editors in various sectors such as Building Technology, Urbanism , Digital tech, etc with JAE editors leading these sectors .

JOURNAL METRICS

• Discussed was the issue of ranking and IMPACT FACTOR (as used in for science and engineering publications). See SCOPUS and Journal Citation Report . Architecture is poorly represented by this – albeit available in City Planning.

• ( IR ) asks whether we are doing enough about speaking to the ACSA about addressing the question of metrics .

• GOOGLE Scholar is one way for gaining access to our metrics as this includes the Humanities metrics.

5

SECOND Half of Meeting

Mike Monti Report

• Better utilization of the web – This is part of a larger conversation that ACSA is having with JAE • The GALLERY is a search engine that searches all of the data bases and the various contents of the ACSA website • The ATLAS resources were discussed; surveys, and documents and data, visualization of important issues affecting schools and graduates • Funding from the NEA in order to find better ways of viewing graphic content - should the JAE lead this? This money will expire if it is not used. • The GUIDE To Architecture Schools needs a reboot as a searchable interface for accredited schools. It is now an all on-line guide, but it can do a better job at collecting the data and organizing it. • ACSA COMMUNICATIONS Plan – in response to declining enrollment. The ACSA is putting together a communication campaign, talking to PR firms to find out how to create a campaign that addresses students, parents and high school consultants ( for offering an intelligible message of how to choose a school). • ( MB ) recommends looking into Landscape as they too are doing this and experiencing success. • The PEER Review system for submissions to JAE and Conferences: ACSA has found a vendor to replace the system that they previously used. This new company will allow for new configurations. This will transition from the Scholar One system which does not have a memory that can be queried.

(MN) asks – “how can we use the JAE WEB better?”

• ( AS ) asks whether we can activate the Print Version by using the WEB to print articles we are interested in? Could we give the theme editor the capacity that lets them expand the content delivery of the theme. • (MB) could it a place for showing student work – via a curated gallery? Or is this more a function for the ACSA • (JS ) could the website be a more dynamic medium in its use of VIDEO. • Can we construct pathways to various forms of social media? • Could we ask the design submissions to supply time base media ( videos) • ( AK ) Is it really possible for the theme editor to generate all of this additional content ? When they are doing all the work to get the print version completed. • Should we use Google Trends – to see what is trending in the JOURNAL? • (AS) asks that we avoid taking on the service mode on the web and that it should remain a curated experience.

6

(GT) and the curating of DRAWINGS .

The role of textual and visual materials . • Hypothes.is group from California working through academic texts to annotate documents. The ACSA does not have a stable website with in which this can happen .

• EDUCATION Genius – is another site for annotating a set of texts .

• (MN) proposes that a couple of people get together with Marc and Pascal to test some ideas – John and Georgene - have created an adhoc committee to make a presentation in the fall.

CONCLUDING the Meeting.

Editorial board meeting in the FALL 1. it should take place prior to when decisions need to be made - date – September 20th and 21 st ? Saturday / Sunday 2. Location – at the ACSA in Washington

Thanks to Sheila and Marshall and out going members.

TAYLOR and FRANCIS - request ; They want targets for promotion of the JAE – who are the groups that they should be looking at. Targeting Europe, book stores and collateral architecture institutes – AIA. RIBA

7 Journal of Architectural Education Author Guide 01 September 2014 DRAFT

General Description

The Journal of Architectural Education (JAE) has been the primary venue for research and commentary on architectural education since it was founded in 1947, making it the oldest continuing operating journal of its kind. Faculty members at ACSA full-member programs, affiliate members, and supporting members, receive print copies of the journal as part of their membership. The journal is available online through a live link from the ACSA website. ACSA members may access issues directly. Libraries, individuals, and organizations interested in subscribing may do so through Taylor and Francis.

The Association of Collegiate School of Architecture (ACSA) through Taylor and Francis publishes the JAE. The journal is published biannually (October and March) to coincide with ACSA’s regional and national annual conferences. The JAE is continually working to increase publishing opportunities and expanded services to our academic and professional community of design professionals through a substantially expanded web-based platform.

A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the JAE endorses its “Best Practices” as do its publishers. By submitting one's work for review and publication, all authors attest to, and agree to abide by, the COPE code of ethical conduct.

If you have questions about the format of a submission or you wish guidance as to whether a subject is appropriate for JSAH, please write directly to the Executive Editor.

ACSA is a non-profit 501(c)3 corporation governed by an elected Board of Directors.

ISNN 1046-4883 E-ISSN 1531-314X ISBN 0-262-75324-3

2 Submission Types

The Journal of Architectural Education (JAE) accepts manuscripts in two submission types; Peer Reviewed Manuscripts and Solicited Manuscripts.

Peer Reviewed Manuscripts To submit a manuscript for peer-review, visit the JAE manuscript management site. Please do not email manuscripts to the editors.

Scholarship of Design Manuscripts are primarily text based and roughly 7,000 words (including endnotes). Essays should be grounded in relevant discourse, offer an original position, and be supported by appropriate visual and textual secondary sources. Design as Scholarship Manuscripts are primarily image based and roughly 1,500 words (including endnotes). Essays are typically project-based and the author of these essays is the author of the subject of the essays. Micro-Narratives Manuscripts are no longer than 1,500 words (including endnotes). Essays examine material proto-histories of those things that continue to fly beneath the disciplinary radar, but without which, architectural practice would be lost. These narratives can be actual accounts of architectural manufacture, or plausible fictions with heuristic potential for future disciplinary creation.

Solicited Manuscripts Solicited manuscripts are sent directly to the editors. Un-solicited essays are accepted but please consult with the Executive Editor before submitting manuscripts of this type. Authors are free to express their own opinions. Editors retain normal editorial responsibilities, including the right of rejection.

Opinion Essays Manuscripts are typically 800 words (including endnotes). Translations Original translations of primary source materials vary in length. Interviews Original interviews vary in length. Reviews (print) Print reviews of single books, events, or exhibitions are typically 900 words. Reviews of multiple books, events, or exhibitions do not exceed 1,500 words. Reviews (online) Online reviews do not exceed 1,500 words and include links, video, and other media. Online reviews may include books, exhibitions, events, buildings, software, or other.

3 Submission Process

• The editorial review process lasts roughly 4 months, depending upon the availability of expert reviewers, the number of reviews required, and the JAE editorial calendar. • Manuscripts must meet the requirements for word count, image count, and scholarly content to qualify for blind peer review. Manuscripts that do not meet these minimum requirements will be rejected without review. • Reviewers are selected by the editors of the JAE. Authors may not suggest reviewers. • The review process for scholarly manuscripts is double-blind. The author’s identity will not be revealed to the reviewers. Likewise, the reviewers’ identities will not be revealed to the author. • Manuscripts will receive one of the following decisions: accept, accept pending major revision, accept pending minor revision, or reject. Authors will receive comments on the manuscript regardless of the decision. • In the event of a split decision, the manuscript may be sent to a third reviewer. • Manuscripts accepted for peer review will be reviewed by two scholars with expertise relevant to the scholarship included in the manuscript. The Executive Editor will make final decision on all manuscripts, based on the findings of the reviewer and in consultation with the editorial staff. If the Executive Editor has a conflict of interest regarding a manuscript, an Associate Editor will make the final decision. • In the event that a manuscript is accepted pending revision, the author will be responsible for completing the revisions within the deadlines imposed by the production schedule. If the author is unwilling or unable to revise the manuscript, the manuscript will not be published, and the author may withdraw the manuscript. • The Executive Editor will be responsible for determining if a revised manuscript meets the revisions requested. If the Executive Editor determines that a revised manuscript fails to address the revision requirements, the executive editor may reject the revision or request additional revisions. • Once the Executive Editor accepts a revised manuscript, the revision may be sent out for a second round of peer review. In the event a manuscript requires a second round of major revisions, the Executive Editor, at his or her discretion, may reject the manuscript.

4 Submission Guidelines

Please review the submission guidelines below, prior to submitting your manuscript to the JAE. Submissions that do not follow all guidelines will not be forwarded for peer-review.

Author Qualifications • The first author of the manuscript must be a faculty member (part or full-time) at the college or university level, or a PhD candidate in architecture or allied discipline. • Students in undergraduate, professional or post-professional degree programs may submit articles if they are listed as a second co-author only.

Manuscript Content • The manuscript must be written in standard (US) English. • It should include original scholarship significant to the field, conducted by the authors. • It should include references, citations, and footnotes as appropriate to the article. • It should be formatted appropriately as work of scholarship.

Publication History • Previously published articles are not accepted. Manuscripts published in full in conference proceedings are considered previous publications. • Manuscripts may contain passages from previously published articles (not to exceed 30%) and the submitted manuscript must have a unique title, abstract, and conclusion. The previous publication should be cited in the endnotes and acknowledgements. • Simultaneous submissions are not accepted.

Copyright Permissions • Copyright permission is not required for initial submission. • Authors must obtain copyright permissions only upon acceptance for publication.

Ethical Considerations • Authors must reveal any conflicts of interest as part of their manuscript submission. • Authors must cite all information from others, as appropriate. • Authors must include the names of all co-authors. • As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the JAE endorses its "Best Practices," as do the publishers of the JAE. By submitting one's work for review and publication, all authors attest to, and agree to abide by, the COPE code of ethical conduct. • Any manuscript that includes research on human subjects, including students, must observe the relevant guidelines and procedures as dictated by the author’s institution and the laws and regulations of the subject’s location.

5 Peer Review Manuscript Submission

To submit a manuscript for peer-review, visit the JAE manuscript management site.

Required Files All text files should be submitted as a word document (.doc or .docx). Please use a 12-point font with seraphs (Times New Roman, for example).

Manuscript Text [Surname_essay] Include an abstract (not to exceed 100 words), text of article, captions, and endnotes. List captions at the end of the document, prior to endnotes. Use the endnote function in word. Exclude any information that identifies the author’s name or institution

Title page [Surname_title] Include manuscript title, author name(s), institutional affiliation(s), email address, telephone number, and other contact instructions if necessary.

Biography [Surname_bio] Include 75-100 word biographic information of each author.

Copyright Form [Surname_copyright] Complete, sign, date and rescan copyright form (provided in this document) as a .pdf.

Figures [Surname_Figure_#] Figures can be either .jpg or .tiff scanned at 300 ppi and not to exceed 10” on the long axis Line drawings should be .eps files at 1200 ppi and not to exceed 10” on the long axis Color images should be saved as RGB; B/W images should be saved as grayscale.

Please avoid using scans from books or other publications as this may result in lower quality scans and/or moiré patterns. For additional information regarding the preparation of digital images, including line art, please see this Penn State Press website.

6

Production Calendar

There are two issues in each volume year. The production calendar is as follows:

Paper Submission: March 01 / August 01

Peer-reviews due: 5 weeks

Decisions to Authors: 1 week

Revised Manuscripts: 4 weeks

Proof to ACSA: 2 weeks

Proof to Copyeditor: 3 weeks

Corrections due from Authors: 1 week

AE Proof: 2 weeks

EE Final Proof: 1 week

Final Proof to Print: 6 weeks

7 Style Guidelines

The Journal of Architectural Education follows The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS), currently in its 16th edition for most editorial guidelines. Clarifications or departures from CMS are included below. When alternative styles are given for humanistic and statistical/scientific copy, the JAE follows the humanistic style. This includes the “documentary-note” style for treating citations. For spelling and treatment of foreign words, the JAE follows the Merriam-Webster dictionary.

Capitalization In titles or headings, do not capitalize articles (a, an, the) and prepositions fewer than 5 letters (e.g., with).

Illustrations and Captions All illustrations, including images, photographs, line drawings, and tables, must include a caption and must be cited in the text of the article.

Citations to figures in the text happen within a sentence, if not constructed as part of a sentence, the citation comes in parentheses at the end of the sentence and before the period. The word figure is capitalized and the text cites the figure using a cardinal number.

For the purpose of this game we have simply invented a riverbank site that is largely vacant at the start (Figure 1).

Captions are intended to briefly describe an illustration and provide a source credit. They should not include bibliographic information, which should instead be included in a note.

The text for all captions should be prepared at the end of the manuscript, preceding the endnotes section. The text for each caption should include the word figure and its number in boldface. The order of information is: figure number, designer (if known), name of the building or object, location, date, brief description (if necessary), and source (using the wording prescribed by the copyright holder, if necessary). Subsequent references may be shorter than the first one.

Images and photographs from projects. Figure 3. University of Minnesota students experiment in a “Materials as Probes” workshop. (Image © KieranTimberlake.)

Figure 10. Al-Sawaber complex with façade alterations. (Photograph by author.)

Works of art or studies from art works. Figure 3. Nic Clear, Game with Vestiges: After Ballard Triptych (2009).

8 Image Guidelines and Permissions

Image permissions are not required until an essay is accepted for publication.

ACSA requires that authors clear rights to images for reproduction in the JAE. You may need to obtain both a loan permission from an image lender (e.g., a museum or a photo bank such as Art Resource or Corbis) and a copyright permission from the rights holder for the work (e.g., an artist, artist’s estate, or agent such as the Artists Rights Society).

Artworks whose creator died more than 70 years ago are no longer in copyright. For such works, the only copyright may be that of a photographer who created the photo of the artwork. Or there may be no photographer’s copyright—if, for example, you take the photo yourself. If there is no copyright, then you only need to rent or purchase or take a photo, and the paperwork need only cover that transaction.

If the artist or architect died less than 70 years ago, or if the work was created by a corporate entity (e.g., an architectural design firm creating a floor plan) less than 125 years ago, copyright is still in effect. (Copyright has this length of term in most countries worldwide.) In such cases, you need to obtain permission from the rights holder as well as rental of a photo, if necessary.

For example, if you wish to reproduce a drawing in the collection of the Finnish Architect Architectural Archives, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder (the architect’s estate, which may be managed by the Artists Rights Society), and you must obtain a photo of the drawing from either a photo bank or the archive. The latter transaction may include you signing a permission form with restrictions or terms—that form is not a copyright permission but a rental contract.

Tips for Obtaining Image Permissions: You should begin to request pictures and permissions as early as possible. Some sources are slow to respond to requests. You can find a Sample Permission Request for Illustrations and/or Cover Art at the end of this document.

• Do the necessary research. Find out who handles permissions for a given artist, artwork, or museum. If you need help understanding this process, contact the editor. For example, the image permissions for the Réunion des Musées Nationaux in France are handled in the U.S. by Art Resource in New York. Many 20th-century artists and artists’ estates are handled by the Artists Rights Society in New York. Image rights holders may be listed in a credits section in a book that reproduces the work. Museums and archives may also supply such information. • Remember that the JAE will need to keep the pictures until after the date of publication. If you are renting images, negotiate a rental term that will accommodate this. • Scope of rights: request world English-language rights. (The JAE is sent to libraries and

9 other member organizations and individuals overseas.) • Request online/digital permission as well. Some lenders are uncomfortable granting permission for online use. You can explain to them that The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians is archived permanently in JSTOR and other digital archives. • As a scholar publishing in a nonprofit academic journal, you can and should negotiate fees. • When submitting your final manuscript and images, enclose scans of all the signed permissions and any other documents you receive from rights holders and image lenders. • Most books print “picture credits” in the front or back, indicating the source of each image. Be sure to consult the credits section of a book before you scan an image from it. If there is no credits page, and the work or photo of the work is not out of copyright, then you may need to write to the permissions department of the publisher to request contact information for the rights holder. • The publisher of a book is usually not the copyright holder for an artwork reproduced in the book. The museum that owns an artwork is usually not the copyright holder for that artwork, though it may assert copyright over a photo of that artwork. Thus, loan forms for the rental of a photo, scan, or transparency are not necessarily the same as copyright permissions. • Lengthy text excerpts may also be in copyright. Fair-use laws permit you to quote within reason (and at length in a review of the book), but in general if you quote at length from a copyrighted text (including a modern copyrighted translation of an old text), you should request permission from the copyright holder (usually the author or publisher).

This site offers more specific information.

This document adapted with thanks from the guidelines prepared by the Society of Architectural Historians. 08/01/14

10 Endnotes Format

Endnotes should be formatted according to the rules set out in The Chicago Manual of Style.

Book Author [or editor], Title (city of publication [include state or country if not commonly known]: publisher, date of publication): page numbers.

Example: K. Michael Hays, ed., Architecture Theory since 1968 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998): 83-86.

Journal Article Author, "Title of article," Journal Title volume no., issue no. (month and year of publication): page numbers.

Example: Carlo Lodoli, "Architectural Education as Storytelling," Journal of Architectural Education 66, no. 1 (March 2007): 16-19.

Essay in a Collection Author, “Title of Article,” in Title of Collection, ed. Name of Editor(s) (city: publisher, date), page numbers.

Example: Douglas Darden, “The Underbelly of Architecture,” in Narrative Architecture, ed. Ben Ledbetter (New York: Harper & Row, 1983), 364–76.

Electronic Sources Provide all of the relevant information mentioned above for the media type (books, articles, etc.). Also provide the complete URL and date accessed.

Examples: Karen Hastings, “Saint in the Saddle?” Dallas Morning News, 25 March 2005, http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/religion/stories/032605dnrelkeralum. 56d1c.htm l (accessed 20 September 2005).

Alison McQueen, “Empress Eugénie’s Quest for a Napoleonic Mausoleum,” Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 2, no. 1 (February. 2003), http://www.19thc- artworldwide.org/winter_03/articles/mcqu.shtml (accessed 5 April 2007).

11 Open Access

Once the manuscript has been published, there are two publication options available. It is your choice whether you take the Standard or Open Select (Gold OA) publication route. The Standard publication route is the default choice.

Standard (Green Open Access) Your paper will be published in the journal and online (viewable for subscribers and licensed institutions across the world). You will also receive a link via email, which you can send to 50 colleagues, who will be able to download the paper free of charge. After the publisher embargo period you can deposit the Accepted Manuscript into an institutional or subject repository.

Open Select (Gold Open Access) Alternatively, an article publishing charge (APC) can be paid, which will make the final version of your article immediately available online for anyone to read. Yourself, your funder, or your institution can make payment if they are a member of our Open Access scheme. Please note that your research article must be more than two printed pages in length to be published this way. Follow this link for more information on article publishing charges.

If you choose to publish as Open Select you will retain all rights to your article but will need to sign an article publishing agreement. If you are affiliated with an institution that has Open Access membership please contact [email protected] (with your full name, article and journal title and details of any funding.

For more information on Open Access, follow this link.

If you prefer to speak to someone directly, please send an email here.

12

Position Available: Editorial Production Manager

The Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) is accepting applications for the position of Editorial Production Manager. ACSA is seeking an organized, detail oriented, energetic multi-tasker to work with the Director of Communications and Media Strategies, ACSA staff, and volunteers, to support a nonprofit communications department.

The Editorial Production Manager is responsible for the coordination, production, and distribution of ACSA’s print and digital publications, and serving as managing editor for the Journal of Architectural Education. These duties require skills in desktop publishing, web publishing, video editing, proofreading, and project management, as well as strong communication and interpersonal skills.

Essential Responsibilities and Duties: • Layout of annual ACSA publications, including conference publications, awards and competition summary books, and other print collateral. • Serve as Managing Editor of the Journal of Architectural Education. • Gather, create, and produce content for the ACSA website, blog, and e- newsletter consistent with best practices and graphic standards. • Prepare digital video for posting on ACSA website.

Knowledge, Education and Experience: • Bachelor’s degree and minimum three years of experience within publishing • Understands production process for print and digital materials • Editing and proofreading experience • Excellent oral and written communication skills • Ability to take initiative, make decisions, and work independently and collaboratively • Computer skills (skilled in Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office Suite, iMovie, HTML, CSS)

Salary is commensurate with experience. Send a cover letter, résumé, and work samples (print and digital) to [email protected]. Position will remain open until filled. No phone calls. ACSA is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. Women and members of traditionally under-represented groups are encouraged to apply.

About ACSA ACSA is an international educational association whose mission is to advance architectural education through programs such as scholarly conferences and publications, design competitions, awards programs, and advocacy. Our members are134 accredited and candidate architectural education programs in the United States and Canada, as well as more than 100 affiliated schools around the world. ACSAʼs office is located near the White House, a short walk from the Metro.

Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture

1 / 3 Berlin, Aug 28, 2014

PROPOSAL JAE - Design of the digital Platform for the Journal of Architectural Education

With this proposal we refer to the inquiry to design a digital platform for the Journal of Architectual Education (JAE). We wish to thank your for your interest in our work and would be delighted designing a digital counterpart for a journal in such a great topic-area.

Considering your question what process we would recommend for the collaboration, this is our suggestion:

1. Kick Off We suggest a kick-off via skype in order to answer open questions and getting acquainted with your ideas and requirements.

2. Structure + Look and Feel We develop a structural concept and design a look and feel. The steps will be discussed with you so that we can understand and exchange the mutual ideas. The presentation of the look and feel takes place on the basis of screenshots.

3. Klickdummy The look and feel is elaborated for the different structural levels of the future website. 2 / 3

This includes the homepage and the different kinds of content (full articles with footnotes, reviews, descriptional details, pictures, tables ...) , filter-system etc. The outcome is a klickdummy in order to show the design, structure, klick-paths, animation and motions of the future website.

Please note that the klickdummy can not be used as the prototype for programming. It will not contain all details and content. For that a detailed design elaboration will be necessary.

To keep this project manageable in complexity and costs we suggest to orient the website towards similar projects of ours such as the swiss architect-site E2A: http://www.e2a.ch/

That is not to say that the JAE website will be a replica of this. Our intention is to give this interesting project a practicable and successful structure.

It will be our ambition to find a convincing and relevant design for the digital existence of your journal. We would be pleased to collaborate with you in that project!

1. Design and Klickdummy EUR6,000.00 structure + look and feel elaboration of design for the different types of content development of animation / motion of designelements klickdummy

TOTAL EUR6,000.00

Costs: The listet costs do not contain the value added tax. To cooperate on this financial basis a certificate from the tax office of the costumer is required - confirming that you are not registered for VAT.

Invoice: The project wil be invoiced in two steps: - 30% after the completion and acceptance of the look and feel - 70 % after the completion and acceptance of the klickdummy 3 / 3

Angebotsannahme für das Angebot Aug 28, 2014 JAE - Design of the digital Platform for the Journal of Architectural Education

Hiermit nehmen wir, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, das Angebot vom PROJEKTBUERO .HENKELHIEDL zu den im Angebot aufgeführten Konditionen an.

Berlin,

Date Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)