Sovereignty, Self-Determination and the South-West Pacific a Comparison of the Status of Pacific Island Territorial Entities in International Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sovereignty, Self-Determination and the South-West Pacific a Comparison of the Status of Pacific Island Territorial Entities in International Law http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Sovereignty, Self-Determination and the South-West Pacific A comparison of the status of Pacific Island territorial entities in international law A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws at The University of Waikato by Charles Andrew Gillard The University of Waikato 2012 iii ABSTRACT This paper compares the constitutional arrangements of various territorial entities in the South-West Pacific, leading to a discussion of those entities‟ status in international law. In particular, it examines the Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau, Norfolk Island, French Polynesia, New Caledonia and American Samoa – all of which are perceived as „Territories‟ in the international community – as a way of critically examining the concept of „Statehood‟ in international law. The study finds that many of these „Territories‟ do not necessarily fit the classification that they have been given. In particular, most of the territorial entities listed above have significant competence to control their own domestic affairs. Some have also begun to develop their own international legal personality by virtue of de facto control over their own external affairs. The United Nations‟ focus on ensuring self-determination also indicates that these territorial entities are likely to gain more autonomy as time goes on. As a result, this paper argues that some of the „Territories‟ are not necessarily Territories at all; instead, they possess independent control over their own domestic and external affairs, and therefore act as de facto States on the global stage. However, many of these territorial entities still remain heavily associated with recognised sovereign States, with none of the included territorial entities possessing their own de jure Head of State or citizenship: both of which are arguably key foundations of an independent identity. Consequently, there are still questions over the extent to which the territorial entities can be considered sovereign, especially given that the relevant „administering States‟ still seem to take economic responsibility for their territorial entities if they believe the situation warrants it. Given these points, this paper argues in favour of a reconceptualisation of the concept of Statehood. It argues that the rise of territorial entities which not only have independent control over their affairs, but which also have significant links to existing States, means that terms such as independence and sovereignty are not either/or concepts. Instead, these concepts should be seen as spectrums, giving rise to a broader definition of Statehood that does not restrictively define States as independent, sovereign entities, but that embraces the concept of „Freely Associated States‟. iv v STATEMENT OF CLARIFICATION This piece of work was completed while the author was employed by the New Zealand Treasury. Despite this, the opinions contained herein are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily constitute the opinion of the Treasury, the New Zealand Government, the University of Waikato, or any other organisation that the author is connected to. vi vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank a number of people who have supported and encouraged me throughout this project: I would like to thank my family, my flatmates, my friends and my work colleagues, for always providing me with support and motivation to continue with this work and to make sure that I finished it. Thanks in particular to Ellis, Tegan, Pene, Toni, Richard, Rachel, Lee and Will for putting up with my constant desire to share interesting facts about the Pacific with you. I am sure that you now know far more about Pacific Island constitutional law than you ever wanted to! I would also like to thank the University of Waikato, who provided me with a Masters Research Scholarship, which helped to support me financially over the year. Similarly, I wish to thank the Treasury, who provided me with some much- needed study leave so that I could complete this endeavor on time and without significant stress. In particular, thank you to Siân Roguski for all your help, interest and support. Thank you also, to the wonderful people who were kind enough to proof-read for me, especially Anna Davies, Maxine O‟Neil, and Liz Thomas for giving up huge amounts of your time to read the whole document from cover-to-cover. My thanks as well, to the wonderful officials from the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the various Embassies and High Commissions in Wellington, and the Office of the Council for the Ongoing Government of Tokelau, for all their advice and information. Without your help, pulling together the research behind this thesis would have been a lot more challenging. My deepest thanks go to Gay Morgan, for your supervision and assistance, as well as for your dedication for putting up with me writing this thesis from the other end of the country. And of course, thank you to Sapphire, for all your help, support, and ability to still put up with me. This is for you. viii ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................. iii Statement of Clarification ....................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ................................................................................................. vii List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................... xi Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Research Method ..................................................................................................... 3 Comparative Law Methodology ....................................................................... 3 Territory Selection ............................................................................................ 6 Paper Structure and Core Research Questions ................................................. 7 Chapter I: States, Territories, and Self-Determination............................................ 9 Independent Legal Personality ......................................................................... 9 „States‟ in International Law ............................................................................ 9 „Territories‟ in International Law ................................................................... 14 States, Territories, and Self-Determination .................................................... 16 Achieving Self-Determination ........................................................................ 20 Chapter II: Introducing the Pacific Territories ...................................................... 27 The Realm of New Zealand ............................................................................ 27 The Commonwealth of Australia and its External Territories ....................... 35 The Republic of France and its Territories in the Pacific ............................... 39 The United States of America and its South-Pacific Territory ....................... 47 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 52 Chapter III: Culture & Identity ............................................................................. 53 Constitutional Structure and Design: Protection of Local Culture ................. 53 Legislative Bodies in the Constitution ........................................................... 55 Cultural and Local Land Protection ............................................................... 57 Head of State .................................................................................................. 59 Language ........................................................................................................ 62 Citizenship ...................................................................................................... 65 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 67 Chapter IV: State-Territory Links and Associations ............................................. 69 Identity-Based Links, including Territories‟ citizenship and Heads of State . 69 Legislative Competence over Domestic Affairs ............................................. 71 Legislative Competence for Constitutional Change ....................................... 80 Economic Links between Territories and Administering States .................... 85 Judicial Links between Territories and Administering States ........................ 92 What does this tell us about Independence? ..................................................
Recommended publications
  • LD ANALYSIS of Inos Snps in an ISOLATED NORFOLK ISLAND
    Linkage disequilibrium analysis in the genetically isolated Norfolk Island population Author Bellis, Claire, Cox, Hannah, Ovcaric, Micky, Begley, Kimberly, Lea, Rodney, Quinlan, Sharon, Burgner, D, Heath, SC, Blangero, J, Griffiths, Lyn Published 2008 Journal Title Heredity DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6801083 Copyright Statement © 2008 Nature Publishing Group. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/22878 Link to published version http://www.nature.com/hdy Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis in the Genetically Isolated Norfolk Island Population C. Bellis1, R.A Lea1,2, D. Burgner3, M. Ovcaric1, S.C Heath4, J. Blangero5 and L.R Griffiths1 1 Genomics Research Centre School of Medical Science Griffith University Gold Coast PMB 50, GCMC Bundall 9726. e-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +61 7 5552 8808, Fax: +61 7 5552 8908 2 Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand 3 School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia 4 Centre National de Génotypage, 2 Rue Gaston Cremieux, Evry, France. 5 Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas, USA Running title: Norfolk Island LD analysis Keywords: Norfolk Island, linkage disequilibrium, genetic isolate, iNOS, Xq13.3 Word count: 3544 Page 1 of 23 Norfolk Island LD analysis ABSTRACT Norfolk Island is a genetic isolate, possessing unique population characteristics that could be utilized for complex disease gene localization.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Currents and Circulation Cook Islands
    OCEAN CURRENTS AND CIRCULATION AVARUA - MOTUTOA, RAROTONGA COOK ISLANDS Brendan Holden SOPAC Technical Secretariat April 1992 SOPAC Technical Report 143 Prepared for: South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC) Coastal and Nearshore Programme, Cook Islands Project: CK.4 [3] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... 6 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 7 METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 10 RESULTS Wind ...................................................................................................................... 13 Waves ..................................................................................................................... 13 Water Levels ............................................................................................................. 15 Water Temperatures .................................................................................................. 16 Current Data ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rarotonga, Samoa & Tonga
    › Rarotonga, Samoa & Tonga Top ExperiencesExperiences › 170ºW 160ºW TOKELAU 'Upolu (New Zealand) 0 200 km 0 120 miles Fale'ula (Islands not to Scale) Penrhyn APIA 10ºS Manono Leulumoega Rakahanga Vailele International Date Line Apolima-uta Cape Mulinu’u Manihiki Solosolo Gateway to the Manono-uta Falefa AMERICAN Pukapuka underworld NORTHERN Mt Fiamoe SAMOA Falelatai Saletele Nassau COOK (960m) Sauniatu (USA) Samamea SAMOA ISLANDS Pulemelei Mound Mt Fito Uafato Lefaga (1028m) Ti'avea Savai'i Polynesia’s largest ancient Suwarrow 'Upolu PAGO Salamumu Samusu PAGO structure Mulivai APIA Poutasi Satitoa Tutuila S O U T H Aitutaki Salani See 'Upolu To Sua Ocean Trench Vavau Enlargement See Tutuila Traditional food, dance P A C I F I C and music Swim this enchanted Enlargement sunken waterhole 0 20 km O C E A N 0 12 miles Vava'u COOK ISLANDS Vava’u SOUTHERN Pola Tutuila Sea kayak in paradise COOK Tal ISLANDS Nu’uuli Falls HA'APAI Secluded deliciously cool GROUP Palmerston swimming hole Vatia Sa'ilele Onenoa Atoll Afono Masefau ’Atiu Aitutaki Manuae Amouli NIUE Mitiaro PAGO PAGO Aua Alofau Aunu'u Delve into hidden Takutea 20ºS limestone caves Fagasa 'Atiu A'asu Matafao Peak Lauli'ituai Aunu'u TONGA Ma'uke Tongatapu Fagamalo (653m) NUKU'ALOFA Ha’apai Rarotonga AVARUA Nu'uuli Swim with humpback A'oloaufou See Tongatapu whales See Rarotonga Poloa Enlargement Enlargement Mt Olotele Tafuna Mangaia Nua (493m) Fagatele Bay Rarotonga Leone Avarua 'Ili'ili Paradise in a submerged Enjoy breakfast at Vailoa Vaitogi volcanic crater Rarotonga AraTapu Punanga
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation
    The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Lead Authors:∗ Tamara Gurevich and Peter Herman Contributing Authors: Nabil Abbyad, Meryem Demirkaya, Austin Drenski, Jeffrey Horowitz, and Grace Kenneally Version 1.00 Abstract This document provides technical documentation for the Dynamic Gravity dataset. The Dynamic Gravity dataset provides extensive country and country pair information for a total of 285 countries and territories, annually, between the years 1948 to 2016. This documentation extensively describes the methodology used for the creation of each variable and the information sources they are based on. Additionally, it provides a large collection of summary statistics to aid in the understanding of the resulting Dynamic Gravity dataset. This documentation is the result of ongoing professional research of USITC Staff and is solely meant to represent the opinions and professional research of individual authors. It is not meant to represent in any way the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its individual Commissioners. It is circulated to promote the active exchange of ideas between USITC Staff and recognized experts outside the USITC, professional devel- opment of Office Staff and increase data transparency by encouraging outside professional critique of staff research. Please address all correspondence to [email protected] or [email protected]. ∗We thank Renato Barreda, Fernando Gracia, Nuhami Mandefro, and Richard Nugent for research assistance in completion of this project. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Nomenclature . .3 1.2 Variables Included in the Dataset . .3 1.3 Contents of the Documentation . .6 2 Country or Territory and Year Identifiers 6 2.1 Record Identifiers .
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008
    OCHA Regional Office for Asia Pacific Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008 OCHA Presence in the Pacific Northern Papua New Guinea Fiji Mariana Humanitarian Affairs Unit (HAU), PNG Regional Disaster Response Islands (U.S.) UN House , Level 14, DeloitteTower, Advisor (RDRA), Fiji Douglas Street, PO Box 1041, 360 Victoria Parade, 3rd Floor Fiji +10 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Development Bank Building, Suva, FIJI Tel: +675 321 2877 Tel: +679 331 6760, +679 331 6761 International Date Line Fax: +675 321 1224 Fax: +679 330 9762 Saipan Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Head: Vini Talai Head: Peter Muller Agana +12 Guam (U.S.) Pacific Ocean +10 MARSHALL ISLANDS Legend Depth (m) OCHA Presence Below 5,000 1,001 to 2,000 MICRONESIA (FSO) Koror Majuro Country capital Palikir 4,001 to 5,000 501 to 1,000 Territory capital PALAU +11 Illustrative boundary 3,001 to 4,000 101 to 500 +9 +10 Time difference with UTC 2,001 to 3,000 o to 100 Tarawa (New York: UTC -5 Equator NAURU Geneva: UTC +1) IMPORTANT NOTE: The boundaries on this map are for illustrative purposes only Yaren Naming Convention and were derived from the map ’The +12 +12 KIRIBATI UN MEMBER STATE Pacific Islands’ published in 2004 by the Territory or Associated State Secretariat of the Pacific Community. INDONESIA TUVALU -11 -10 PAPUA NEW GUINEA United Nations Office for the Coordination +10 +12 of Humanitarian affairs (OCHA) Funafuti Toke lau (N.Z.) Regional Office for Asia Pacific (ROAP) Honiara Executive Suite, 2nd Floor, -10 UNCC Building,
    [Show full text]
  • Sustained Prehistoric Exploitation of a Marshall Islands Fishery
    Sustained prehistoric exploitation of a Marshall Islands fishery: ichthyoarchaeological approaches, marine resource use, and human- environment interactions on Ebon Atoll Ariana Blaney Joan Lambrides BA (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2017 School of Social Science Abstract Atolls are often characterised in terms of the environmental constraints and challenges these landscapes impose on sustained habitation, including: nutrient-poor soils and salt laden winds that impede plant growth, lack of perennial surface fresh water, limited terrestrial biodiversity, and vulnerability to extreme weather events and inundation since most atolls are only 2-3 m above sea level. Yet, on Ebon Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands in eastern Micronesia, the oceanside and lagoonside intertidal marine environments are expansive, with the reef area four times larger than the land area, supporting a diverse range of taxa. Given the importance of finfish resources in the Pacific, and specifically Ebon, this provided an ideal context for evaluating methods and methodological approaches for conducting Pacific ichthyoarchaeological analyses, and based on this assessment, implement high resolution and globally recognised approaches to investigate the spatial and temporal variation in the Ebon marine fishery. Variability in landscape use, alterations in the range of taxa captured, archaeological proxies of past climate stability, and the comparability of archaeological and ecological datasets were considered. Utilising a historical ecology approach, this thesis provides an analysis of the exploitation of the Ebon marine fishery from initial settlement to the historic period—two millennia of continuous occupation. The thesis demonstrated the importance of implementing high resolution methods and methodologies when considering long-term human interactions with marine fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Democratic Republic of Algeria
    People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research Higher School of Management Sciences Annaba A Course of Business English for 1st year Preparatory Class Students Elaborated by: Dr GUERID Fethi The author has taught this module for 4 years from the academic year 2014/2015 to 2018/2019 Academic Year 2020/2021 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents...………………………………………………………….….I Acknowelegments……………………………………………………………....II Aim of the Course……………………………………………………………..III Lesson 1: English Tenses………………………………………………………..5 Lesson 2: Organizations………………………………………………………..13 Lesson 3: Production…………………………………………………………...18 Lesson 4: Distribution channels: Wholesale and Retail………………………..22 Lesson 5: Marketing …………………………………………………………...25 Lesson 6: Advertising …………………………………………………………28 Lesson 7: Conditional Sentences………………………………………………32 Lesson 8: Accounting1…………………………………………………………35 Lesson 9: Money and Work……………………………………………………39 Lesson 10: Types of Business Ownership……………………………………..43 Lesson 11: Passive voice……………………………………………………….46 Lesson 12: Management……………………………………………………….50 SUPPORTS: 1- Grammatical support: List of Irregular Verbs of English………..54 2- List of Currencies of the World………………………………….66 3- Business English Terminology in English and French………….75 References and Further Reading…………………………………………….89 I 2 Acknowledgments I am grateful to my teaching colleagues who preceded me in teaching this business English module at our school. This contribution is an addition to their efforts. I am thankful to Mrs Benghomrani Naziha, who has contributed before in designing English programmes to different levels, years and classes at Annaba Higher School of Management Sciences. I am also grateful to the administrative staff for their support. II 3 Aim of the Course The course aims is to equip 1st year students with the needed skills in business English to help them succeed in their study of economics and business and master English to be used at work when they finish the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Perhaps One Framework That Could Have Been Explored As a Possible Theme of the Book Was the Differences in Strategy Employed by Various National-Based IWW Unions
    REVIEWS (BOOKS) 167 Perhaps one framework that could have been explored as a possible theme of the book was the differences in strategy employed by various national-based IWW unions. For example, a major contrast existed between the US IWW, with its ‘dual unionist’ strategy (meaning it set up a new militant industrial union in opposition to conservative, craft-based unions), and the IWW in Australasia, where, as Verity Burgmann details in her chapter about the Australian IWW, Wobblies aimed to ‘bore from within’ existing unions and union federations, such as the ‘Red Feds’ (the first Federation of Labour in Aotearoa New Zealand), and actually had some success. Further, in seeking to overcome the IWW’s marginalization by historians globally – including in this country – the book sometimes veers towards over-inflating the IWW’s influence. For example, the editors’ claim that ‘the IWW reached almost every corner of the globe’ (p.8) seems exaggerated given the IWW’s negligible presence in Africa and Asia, and its sporadic influence in Europe and South America (apart from perhaps Chile and Argentina, which are not covered in the book). Wobblies of the World is a welcome addition to studies of the IWW and syndicalism globally and in Aotearoa New Zealand. It covers a broad range of countries, uses multi-lingual sources innovatively, and attempts to overcome the academic–activist divide. Yet overall these innovations are unfortunately let down by its narrative- based chapters that overall lack in-depth critical analysis. Very good, and sometimes excellent, chapters about the French influence over the IWW, and the IWW influence in Australasia, Mexico, Sweden and South Africa (among others) sit uneasily alongside chapters which are little more than fragmentary snippets and biographical vignettes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokelau the Last Colony?
    Tokelau The last colony? TONY ANGELO (Taupulega) is, and long has been, the governing body. The chairman (Faipule) of the council and a village head ITUATED WELL NORTH OF NEW ZEALAND and (Pulenuku) are elected by universal suffrage in the village SWestern Samoa and close to the equator, the small every three years. The three councils send representatives atolls of Tokelau, with their combined population of about to form the General Fono which is the Tokelau national 1600 people, may well be the last colony of New Zealand. authority; it originally met only once or twice a year and Whether, when and in what way that colonial status of advised the New Zealand Government of Tokelau's Tokelau will end, is a mat- wishes. ter of considerable specula- The General Fono fre- lion. quently repeated advice, r - Kirlb•ll ·::- (Gifb•rr I•) The recently passed lbn•b'a ' ......... both to the New Zealand (Oc: ..n I} Tokelau Amendment Act . :_.. PMtnb 11 Government and to the UN 1996- it received the royal Committee on Decoloni­ • •• roltfl•u assent on 10 June 1996, and 0/tlh.g• sation, that Tokelau did not 1- •, Aotum•- Uu.t (Sw•ln•J · came into force on 1 August 1 f .. • Tllloplol ~~~~~ !•J.. ·-~~~oa wish to change its status ~ ~ 1996 - is but one piece in ' \, vis-a-vis New Zealand. the colourful mosaic of •l . However, in an unexpected Tokelau's constitutional de­ change of position (stimu- velopment. lated no doubt by external The colonialism that factors such as the UN pro­ Tokelau has known has posal to complete its been the British version, and decolonisation business by it has lasted so far for little the year 2000), the Ulu of over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Königs-Und Fürstenhäuser Aktuelle Staatsführungen DYNASTIEN
    GESCHICHTE und politische Bildung STAATSOBERHÄUPTER (bis 2019) Dynastien Bedeutende Herrscher und Regierungschefs europ.Staaten seit dem Mittelalter Königs-und Fürstenhäuser Aktuelle Staatsführungen DYNASTIEN Römisches Reich Hl. Römisches Reich Fränkisches Reich Bayern Preussen Frankreich Spanien Portugal Belgien Liechtenstein Luxemburg Monaco Niederlande Italien Großbritannien Dänemark Norwegen Schweden Österreich Polen Tschechien Ungarn Bulgarien Rumänien Serbien Kroatien Griechenland Russland Türkei Vorderer Orient Mittel-und Ostasien DYNASTIEN und ihre Begründer RÖMISCHES REICH 489- 1 v.Chr Julier Altrömisches Patriziergeschlecht aus Alba Longa, Stammvater Iulus, Gaius Iulius Caesar Julisch-claudische Dynastie: Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero 69- 96 n.Ch Flavier Röm. Herrschergeschlecht aus Latium drei römische Kaiser: Vespasian, Titus, Domitian 96- 180 Adoptivkaiser u. Antonionische Dynastie Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Mark Aurel, Commodus 193- 235 Severer Aus Nordafrika stammend Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabal, Severus Alexander 293- 364 Constantiner (2.flavische Dynastie) Begründer: Constantius Chlorus Constantinus I., Konstantin I. der Große u.a. 364- 392 Valentinianische Dynastie Valentinian I., Valens, Gratian, Valentinian II. 379- 457 Theodosianische Dynastie Theodosius I.der Große, Honorius, Valentinian III.... 457- 515 Thrakische Dynastie Leo I., Majorian, Anthemius, Leo II., Julius Nepos, Zeno, Anastasius I. 518- 610 Justinianische Dynastie Justin I.,Justinian I.,Justin II.,Tiberios
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-08-655 American Samoa
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO June 2008 AMERICAN SAMOA Issues Associated with Potential Changes to the Current System for Adjudicating Matters of Federal Law GAO-08-655 June 2008 AMERICAN SAMOA Accountability Integrity Reliability Issues Associated with Potential Changes to the Highlights Current System for Adjudicating Matters of Federal Highlights of GAO-08-655, a report to Law congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found American Samoa is the only Because American Samoa does not have a federal court like the CNMI, Guam, populated U.S. insular area that or USVI, matters of federal law arising in American Samoa have generally does not have a federal court. been adjudicated in U.S. district courts in Hawaii or the District of Columbia. Congress has granted the local High Court federal jurisdiction for Reasons offered for changing the existing system focus primarily on the certain federal matters, such as difficulties of adjudicating matters of federal law arising in American Samoa, specific areas of maritime law. GAO was asked to conduct a study principally based on American Samoa’s remote location, and the desire to of American Samoa’s system for provide American Samoans more direct access to justice. Reasons offered addressing matters of federal law. against any changes focus primarily on concerns about the effects of an Specifically, this report discusses: increased federal presence on Samoan culture and traditions and concerns (1) the current system for about juries’ impartiality given close family ties. During the mid-1990s, several adjudicating matters of federal law proposals were studied and many of the issues discussed then, such as the in American Samoa and how it protection of local culture, were also raised during this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Activities
    Coastal Community Resilience Building Resilience from the Inside Out AWR-228 Participant Guide Version 1.0 NATIONAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS TRAINING CENTER Copyright Information Coastal Community Resilience © National Disaster Preparedness Training Center, University of Hawaii 2011 All Rights Reserved. First Edition 2011 This Printing: July 2011 Printed in the United States of America Reproduction of this document in whole or in part in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, digital copying, recording, taping, Web distribution, or information storage and retrieval systems is strictly prohibited. This program was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 2009-NA-T9-K004 and 2010-NA-T0-K012 administered by the US Department of Homeland Security, National Training and Education Division. Points of view or opinions in this program are those of the author(s) and do not represent the position or policies of the US Department of Homeland Security. Department of Homeland Security reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and authorize others to use, for federal government purposes: (1) the copyright in any work developed under an award or subaward; and (2) any rights of copyright to which a recipient or sub-recipient purchases ownership with federal support. Coastal Community Resilience Participant Guide Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]