Relational Algebra Relational Algebra Union, Intersection, Difference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Relational Algebra Relational Algebra Union, Intersection, Difference Query Languages for Week 3 – Relational Algebra Relational Databases Operations on databases: Queries — read data from the database; Querying and Updating a Database Updates — change the content of the database. The Relational Algebra In this lecture unit we discuss the relational algebra, Union, Intersection, Difference a procedural language that defines database Renaming, Selection and Projection operations in terms of algebraic expressions. [The Relational Calculus is a declarative language Join, Cartesian Product for database operations based on Predicate Logic; we will not discuss it here.] CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —1 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —2 Relational Algebra Union, Intersection, Difference A collection of algebraic operators that Are defined on relations; Relations are sets, so we can apply set-theoretic Produce relations as results, operators and therefore can be combined to form However, we want the results to be relations complex algebraic expressions. (that is, homogeneous sets of tuples) Operators: It is therefore meaningful to only apply union, Union, intersection, difference; intersection, difference to pairs of relations Renaming; defined over the same attributes. Selection and Projection; Join (natural join, Cartesian product, theta join). CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —3 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —4 1 Union Intersection Graduates Graduates Number Surname Age Number Surname Age 7274 Robinson 37 7274 Robinson 37 7432 O'Malley 39 Graduates ∪ Managers 7432 O'Malley 39 9824 Darkes 38 Number Surname Age 9824 Darkes 38 Graduates ∩ Managers 7274 Robinson 37 Number Surname Age 7432 O'Malley 39 7432 O'Malley 39 Managers 9824 Darkes 38 Managers 9824 Darkes 38 Number Surname Age 9297 O'Malley 56 Number Surname Age 9297 O'Malley 56 9297 O'Malley 56 7432 O'Malley 39 7432 O'Malley 39 9824 Darkes 38 9824 Darkes 38 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —5 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —6 Difference A Meaningful but Impossible Union Graduates Paternity Maternity Number Surname Age Father Child Mother Child 7274 Robinson 37 Adam Cain Eve Cain 7432 O'Malley 39 Adam Abel Eve Seth 9824 Darkes 38 Graduates - Managers Abraham Isaac Sarah Isaac Number Surname Age Abraham Ishmael Hagar Ishmael Managers 7274 Robinson 37 Number Surname Age 9297 O'Malley 56 Paternity ∪ Maternity ??? 7432 O'Malley 39 9824 Darkes 38 The problem: Father and Mother are different names, but both represent a parent. The solution: rename attributes! CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —7 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —8 2 Renaming Example of Renaming This is a unary operator which changes attribute ρ (Paternity) names for a relation without changing any Paternity Father−> Parent Father Child Parent Child values. Adam Cain Adam Cain Adam Abel Adam Abel Renaming removes the limitations associated Abraham Isaac Abraham Isaac with set operators. Abraham Ishmael Abraham Ishmael Notation: ρOldName→NewName(r) The textbook allows positions rather than attribute For example, ρFather→Parent(Paternity) names, e.g., → If there are two or more attributes involved in a 1 Parent renaming operation, then ordering is meaningful: Textbook also allows renaming of the relation itself,e.g.,Paternity,1→ Parenthood,Parent e.g., ρBranch,Salary → Location,Pay(Employees) CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —9 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —10 Renaming and Union, Renaming and Union with Several Attributes Paternity Maternity Father Child Mother Child Employees Adam Cain Eve Cain Eve Seth Surname Branch Salary Adam Abel Staff Abraham Isaac Sarah Isaac Patterson Rome 45 Trumble London 53 Abraham Ishmael Hagar Ishmael Surname Factory Wages Patterson Rome 45 Trumble London 53 ρFather->Parent(Paternity) ∪ρMother->Parent(Maternity) Parent Child Adam Cain Adam Abel ρBranch,Salary→Location,Pay(Employees) ∪ρFactory, Wages→Location,Pay(Staff) Abraham Isaac Surname Location Pay Abraham Ishmael Patterson Rome 45 Eve Cain Trumble London 53 Eve Seth Cooke Chicago 33 Sarah Isaac Bush Monza 32 Hagar Ishmael CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —11 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —12 3 Selection and Projection Selection These are unary operators, in a sense orthogonal: This is a unary operation which returns a relation selection for "horizontal" decompositions; with the same schema as the operand; projection for "vertical" decompositions. but, with a subset of the tuples of the operand, A B C Selection A B C i.e., only those that satisfy a condition. Notation: σF(r) Semantics: σF(r) = { t | t ∈r s.t. t satisfies F, I.e., F(t)} A B C A B Projection CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —13 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —14 Selection Example Selection, Another Example We can use Employees the or Surname FirstName Age Salary Citizens symbol (v), Smith Mary 25 2000 Surname FirstName PlaceOfBirth Residence Not symbol Black Lucy 40 3000 Smith Mary Rome Milan Verdi Nico 36 4500 Black Lucy Rome Rome (¬) & and Smith Mark 40 3900 Verdi Nico Florence Florence symbol (ʌ) Smith Mark Naples Florence as we would for σ (Employees) Age<30 v Salary>4000 σ PlaceOfBirth=Residence (Citizens) specifying Surname FirstName Age Salary Surname FirstName PlaceOfBirth Residence any logical Smith Mary 25 2000 Black Lucy Rome Rome condition Verdi Nico 36 4500 Verdi Nico Florence Florence CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —15 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —16 4 Projection Example of Projection Projection returns a relation which includes a subset Employees of the attributes of the operand. Surname FirstName Department Head Smith Mary Sales De Rossi Notation: Given a relation r(X) and a subset Y of X: Black Lucy Sales De Rossi Verdi Mary Personnel Fox πY(r) Smith Mark Personnel Fox Semantics: πY(r) = { t[Y] | t ∈ r } πSurname, FirstName(Employees) Surname FirstName Smith Mary Black Lucy Verdi Mary Smith Mark CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —17 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —18 Another Example Cardinality of Projection Operations Note that the result of a projection contains at most as many tuples as the operand relation. Employees Surname FirstName Department Head However, it may contain fewer, if several tuples Smith Mary Sales De Rossi Black Lucy Sales De Rossi collapse, i.e., they are identical in all their values. Verdi Mary Personnel Fox Smith Mark Personnel Fox Theorem: πY(r) contains as many tuples as r if and only if Y is a superkey for r. This property holds even if Y is "by chance” a πDepartment, Head (Employees) Department Head superkey, i.e., it is not defined as a superkey in the Sales De Rossi schema, but it is a superkey for the current Personnel Fox database, see the example. CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —19 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —20 5 Tuples that Collapse Tuples that do not Collapse, "by Chance" Students Students RegNum Surname FirstName BirthDate DegreeProg RegNum Surname FirstName BirthDate DegreeProg 284328 Smith Luigi 29/04/59 Computing 296328 Smith John 29/04/59 Computing 296328 Smith John 29/04/59 Computing 587614 Smith Lucy 01/05/61 Engineering 587614 Smith Lucy 01/05/61 Engineering 934856 Black Lucy 01/05/61 Fine Art 934856 Black Lucy 01/05/61 Fine Art 965536 Black Lucy 05/03/58 Engineering 965536 Black Lucy 05/03/58 Fine Art π (Students) πSurname, DegreeProg (Students) Surname, DegreeProg Surname DegreeProg Surname DegreeProg Smith Computing Smith Computing Smith Engineering Smith Engineering Black Fine Art Black Fine Art Black Engineering CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —21 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —22 Join A Natural Join The most used operator in the relational algebra. Allows us to establish connections among data in r1 r2 different relations, taking advantage of the "value- Employee Department Department Head Smith sales production Mori based" nature of the relational model. Black production sales Brown White production Two main versions of the join: "natural" join: takes attribute names into account; r1 ⋈ r2 "theta" join. Employee Department Head Smith sales Brown Both join operations are denoted by the symbol ⋈. Black production Mori White production Mori CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —23 CSC343 Introduction to Databases — University of Toronto Relational Algebra —24 6 Definition of Natural Join Natural Join: Comments r1 (X1), r2 (X2) The tuples in the resulting relation are obtained by r1 ⋈ r2 (natural join of r1 and r2) is a relation on combining tuples in the operands with equal X1X2 (the union of the two sets): values on the common attributes { t on X1X2 | t [X1] ∈ r1 and t [X2] ∈ r2 } The common attributes often form a key of one of the operands (remember: references
Recommended publications
  • Relational Algebra
    Relational Algebra Instructor: Shel Finkelstein Reference: A First Course in Database Systems, 3rd edition, Chapter 2.4 – 2.6, plus Query Execution Plans Important Notices • Midterm with Answers has been posted on Piazza. – Midterm will be/was reviewed briefly in class on Wednesday, Nov 8. – Grades were posted on Canvas on Monday, Nov 13. • Median was 83; no curve. – Exam will be returned in class on Nov 13 and Nov 15. • Please send email if you want “cheat sheet” back. • Lab3 assignment was posted on Sunday, Nov 5, and is due by Sunday, Nov 19, 11:59pm. – Lab3 has lots of parts (some hard), and is worth 13 points. – Please attend Labs to get help with Lab3. What is a Data Model? • A data model is a mathematical formalism that consists of three parts: 1. A notation for describing and representing data (structure of the data) 2. A set of operations for manipulating data. 3. A set of constraints on the data. • What is the associated query language for the relational data model? Two Query Languages • Codd proposed two different query languages for the relational data model. – Relational Algebra • Queries are expressed as a sequence of operations on relations. • Procedural language. – Relational Calculus • Queries are expressed as formulas of first-order logic. • Declarative language. • Codd’s Theorem: The Relational Algebra query language has the same expressive power as the Relational Calculus query language. Procedural vs. Declarative Languages • Procedural program – The program is specified as a sequence of operations to obtain the desired the outcome. I.e., how the outcome is to be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Algebra and SQL Relational Query Languages
    Relational Algebra and SQL Chapter 5 1 Relational Query Languages • Languages for describing queries on a relational database • Structured Query Language (SQL) – Predominant application-level query language – Declarative • Relational Algebra – Intermediate language used within DBMS – Procedural 2 1 What is an Algebra? · A language based on operators and a domain of values · Operators map values taken from the domain into other domain values · Hence, an expression involving operators and arguments produces a value in the domain · When the domain is a set of all relations (and the operators are as described later), we get the relational algebra · We refer to the expression as a query and the value produced as the query result 3 Relational Algebra · Domain: set of relations · Basic operators: select, project, union, set difference, Cartesian product · Derived operators: set intersection, division, join · Procedural: Relational expression specifies query by describing an algorithm (the sequence in which operators are applied) for determining the result of an expression 4 2 The Role of Relational Algebra in a DBMS 5 Select Operator • Produce table containing subset of rows of argument table satisfying condition σ condition (relation) • Example: σ Person Hobby=‘stamps’(Person) Id Name Address Hobby Id Name Address Hobby 1123 John 123 Main stamps 1123 John 123 Main stamps 1123 John 123 Main coins 9876 Bart 5 Pine St stamps 5556 Mary 7 Lake Dr hiking 9876 Bart 5 Pine St stamps 6 3 Selection Condition • Operators: <, ≤, ≥, >, =, ≠ • Simple selection
    [Show full text]
  • Session 5 – Main Theme
    Database Systems Session 5 – Main Theme Relational Algebra, Relational Calculus, and SQL Dr. Jean-Claude Franchitti New York University Computer Science Department Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Presentation material partially based on textbook slides Fundamentals of Database Systems (6th Edition) by Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Slides copyright © 2011 and on slides produced by Zvi Kedem copyight © 2014 1 Agenda 1 Session Overview 2 Relational Algebra and Relational Calculus 3 Relational Algebra Using SQL Syntax 5 Summary and Conclusion 2 Session Agenda . Session Overview . Relational Algebra and Relational Calculus . Relational Algebra Using SQL Syntax . Summary & Conclusion 3 What is the class about? . Course description and syllabus: » http://www.nyu.edu/classes/jcf/CSCI-GA.2433-001 » http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/fall11/CSCI-GA.2433-001/ . Textbooks: » Fundamentals of Database Systems (6th Edition) Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Addition Wesley ISBN-10: 0-1360-8620-9, ISBN-13: 978-0136086208 6th Edition (04/10) 4 Icons / Metaphors Information Common Realization Knowledge/Competency Pattern Governance Alignment Solution Approach 55 Agenda 1 Session Overview 2 Relational Algebra and Relational Calculus 3 Relational Algebra Using SQL Syntax 5 Summary and Conclusion 6 Agenda . Unary Relational Operations: SELECT and PROJECT . Relational Algebra Operations from Set Theory . Binary Relational Operations: JOIN and DIVISION . Additional Relational Operations . Examples of Queries in Relational Algebra . The Tuple Relational Calculus . The Domain Relational Calculus 7 The Relational Algebra and Relational Calculus . Relational algebra . Basic set of operations for the relational model . Relational algebra expression . Sequence of relational algebra operations . Relational calculus . Higher-level declarative language for specifying relational queries 8 Unary Relational Operations: SELECT and PROJECT (1/3) .
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Algebra & Relational Calculus
    Relational Algebra & Relational Calculus Lecture 4 Kathleen Durant Northeastern University 1 Relational Query Languages • Query languages: Allow manipulation and retrieval of data from a database. • Relational model supports simple, powerful QLs: • Strong formal foundation based on logic. • Allows for optimization. • Query Languages != programming languages • QLs not expected to be “Turing complete”. • QLs not intended to be used for complex calculations. • QLs support easy, efficient access to large data sets. 2 Relational Query Languages • Two mathematical Query Languages form the basis for “real” query languages (e.g. SQL), and for implementation: • Relational Algebra: More operational, very useful for representing execution plans. • Basis for SEQUEL • Relational Calculus: Let’s users describe WHAT they want, rather than HOW to compute it. (Non-operational, declarative.) • Basis for QUEL 3 4 Cartesian Product Example • A = {small, medium, large} • B = {shirt, pants} A X B Shirt Pants Small (Small, Shirt) (Small, Pants) Medium (Medium, Shirt) (Medium, Pants) Large (Large, Shirt) (Large, Pants) • A x B = {(small, shirt), (small, pants), (medium, shirt), (medium, pants), (large, shirt), (large, pants)} • Set notation 5 Example: Cartesian Product • What is the Cartesian Product of AxB ? • A = {perl, ruby, java} • B = {necklace, ring, bracelet} • What is BxA? A x B Necklace Ring Bracelet Perl (Perl,Necklace) (Perl, Ring) (Perl,Bracelet) Ruby (Ruby, Necklace) (Ruby,Ring) (Ruby,Bracelet) Java (Java, Necklace) (Java, Ring) (Java, Bracelet) 6 Mathematical Foundations: Relations • The domain of a variable is the set of its possible values • A relation on a set of variables is a subset of the Cartesian product of the domains of the variables. • Example: let x and y be variables that both have the set of non- negative integers as their domain • {(2,5),(3,10),(13,2),(6,10)} is one relation on (x, y) • A table is a subset of the Cartesian product of the domains of the attributes.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Algebra Expression Evaluation
    Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Relational Algebra Expression Evaluation Bachelor's Thesis Lucie Molkov´a Brno, spring 2009 Declaration Thereby I declare that this thesis is my original work, which I have created on my own. All sources and literature used in writing the thesis, as well as any quoted material, are properly cited, including full reference to its source. Advisor: RNDr. Vlastislav Dohnal, Ph.D. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor RNDr. Vlastislav Dohnal, Ph.D. for the help and motivation he provided throughout my work on this thesis and to Loren K. Rhodes, Ph.D. for valuable inputs. Special thanks go to Tom´aˇsJanouˇsekand Bc. Petr Roˇckai for support and ideas that saved me a lot of time. Abstract Relational algebra is a query language that is being used to explain basic relational operations and their principles. Many books and articles are concerned with the theory of relational algebra, however there is no practical use for it. One of the reasons is that no software exists that would allow a real use of relational alge- bra. Most of the currently used relational database management systems work with SQL queries. This work therefore describes and implemets a tool that transforms a relational algebra expressions into SQL queries, allowing the expressions to be evaluated in standard databases. This work also defines a new, applicable syntax for relational algebra and describes its grammar in order to ensure the correctness of the expressions. Keywords Relationa Algebra, SQL, Transformation, Perl, Parsing, Parse::Yapp, Syntax Anal- ysis, Semantic Analysis Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Objectives .
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Operations on Tabular Data Context 6.1 Basic Idea of Relational
    Context Database Design: 6 The Relational Data Model: e s - developing a relational a Requirements analysis b database schema Algebraic operations on tabular data a t Design: a d - formal theory 6.1 Basic idea of relational languages Conceptual Design g n i Data handling in a rela- s 6.2 Relational Algebra operations u tional database Schema design d 6.3 Relational Algebra: Syntax and Semantics n - Algebra,-calculus -SQL -logical a (“create tables”) g Extensions 6.4. More Operators n i n g Using Databases 6.5 Special Topics of RA i s from application progs 6.5.1 Relational algebra operators in SQL e D : Special topics, 6.5.2 Relational completeness 1 Schema design t Physical Schema, 6.5.3 What is missing in RA? r a -physical P 6.5.4 RA operator trees Part 2: (“create access path”) Implementation of DBS Loading, administration, Transaction, Kemper / Eickler: 3.4, Elmasri /Navathe: chap. 74-7.6, tuning, maintenance, Concurrency control Garcia-Molina, Ullman, Widom: chap. 5 reorganization Recovery 6.1 Basic idea of relational languages Relational Languages • Data Model: Important concepts Goal of language design Language for definition and Given a relational database like the Video shop DB handling (manipulation ) of data Design a language, which allows to express queries – Languages for handling data: like: • Relational Algebra (RA) as a semantically well defined - Customers who rented videos for more than 100 $ last month applicative language - List of all movies no copy of which have been on loan since 2 month - List the total sales volume of each movie within the last year • Relational tuple calculus (domain calculus): predicate logic - Is there anybody whose rented movies all have category "horror"? interpretation of data and queries y? …….
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Databases, Logic, and Complexity
    Relational Databases, Logic, and Complexity Phokion G. Kolaitis University of California, Santa Cruz & IBM Research-Almaden [email protected] 2009 GII Doctoral School on Advances in Databases 1 What this course is about Goals: Cover a coherent body of basic material in the foundations of relational databases Prepare students for further study and research in relational database systems Overview of Topics: Database query languages: expressive power and complexity Relational Algebra and Relational Calculus Conjunctive queries and homomorphisms Recursive queries and Datalog Selected additional topics: Bag Semantics, Inconsistent Databases Unifying Theme: The interplay between databases, logic, and computational complexity 2 Relational Databases: A Very Brief History The history of relational databases is the history of a scientific and technological revolution. Edgar F. Codd, 1923-2003 The scientific revolution started in 1970 by Edgar (Ted) F. Codd at the IBM San Jose Research Laboratory (now the IBM Almaden Research Center) Codd introduced the relational data model and two database query languages: relational algebra and relational calculus . “A relational model for data for large shared data banks”, CACM, 1970. “Relational completeness of data base sublanguages”, in: Database Systems, ed. by R. Rustin, 1972. 3 Relational Databases: A Very Brief History Researchers at the IBM San Jose Laboratory embark on the System R project, the first implementation of a relational database management system (RDBMS) In 1974-1975, they develop SEQUEL , a query language that eventually became the industry standard SQL . System R evolved to DB2 – released first in 1983. M. Stonebraker and E. Wong embark on the development of the Ingres RDBMS at UC Berkeley in 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Database Management Systems Solutions Manual Third Edition
    DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS MANUAL THIRD EDITION Raghu Ramakrishnan University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA Johannes Gehrke Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA Jeff Derstadt, Scott Selikoff, and Lin Zhu Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA CONTENTS PREFACE iii 1 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE SYSTEMS 1 2 INTRODUCTION TO DATABASE DESIGN 6 3THERELATIONALMODEL 16 4 RELATIONAL ALGEBRA AND CALCULUS 28 5 SQL: QUERIES, CONSTRAINTS, TRIGGERS 45 6 DATABASE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT 63 7 INTERNET APPLICATIONS 66 8 OVERVIEW OF STORAGE AND INDEXING 73 9 STORING DATA: DISKS AND FILES 81 10 TREE-STRUCTURED INDEXING 88 11 HASH-BASED INDEXING 100 12 OVERVIEW OF QUERY EVALUATION 119 13 EXTERNAL SORTING 126 14 EVALUATION OF RELATIONAL OPERATORS 131 i iiDatabase Management Systems Solutions Manual Third Edition 15 A TYPICAL QUERY OPTIMIZER 144 16 OVERVIEW OF TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT 159 17 CONCURRENCY CONTROL 167 18 CRASH RECOVERY 179 19 SCHEMA REFINEMENT AND NORMAL FORMS 189 20 PHYSICAL DATABASE DESIGN AND TUNING 204 21 SECURITY 215 PREFACE It is not every question that deserves an answer. Publius Syrus, 42 B.C. I hope that most of the questions in this book deserve an answer. The set of questions is unusually extensive, and is designed to reinforce and deepen students’ understanding of the concepts covered in each chapter. There is a strong emphasis on quantitative and problem-solving type exercises. While I wrote some of the solutions myself, most were written originally by students in the database classes at Wisconsin. I’d like to thank the many students who helped in developing and checking the solutions to the exercises; this manual would not be available without their contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter (5) the Relational Data Model, Relational Constraints, and the Relational Algebra
    Chapter (5) The Relational Data Model, Relational Constraints, and the Relational Algebra Objectives • Describe the basic principals of the relational model of data • Define the modeling concepts and notation of the relational model • Learn about the relational constraints • Define the update operations of the relational model • Handling the violations of the integrity constraints • Learn about relational algebra that is used to manipulate relations and specifying queries. The relational model was first introduced by Ted Codd of IBM Research in a 1970 in a classic paper [Codd 1970]. 1 Relational Model Concepts The relational model represents the database as a collection of relations. A relation is often resembles a table of values or to some extent, a “flat” file of records. There are important differences between relations and files. A relation that is thought as a table of values contains rows that represent a collection of related values. In the formal relational model terminology, a row is called a tuple, a column header is called an attribute, and the table is called a relation. The data type describing the types of values that can appear in each column is called a domain. 2 1 Domains A domain D is a set of values that are indivisible as far as the relational model is concerned, i.e., it contains a set of atomic values. Examples: USA_Phone numbers. Which is ….. Local_phone_numbers. Which is … Names: The set of names of persons. Social_security_numbers: The set of valid 9-digit social security numbers. GPA: A real value between 0 and 4. There is a data type of format associated with each domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Algebra
    Cleveland State University CIS611 – Relational Database Systems Lecture Notes Prof. Victor Matos RELATIONAL ALGEBRA V. Matos - CIS611_LECTURE_NOTES_ALGEBRA.docx 1 THE RELATIONAL DATA MODEL (RM) and the Relational Algebra The relational model of data (RM) was introduced by Dr. E. Codd (CACM, June 1970). The RM is simpler and more uniform than the preceding Network and Hierarchical model. S.Todd, (IBM 1976) presented PRTV the first implementation of a relational algebra DBMS. A. Klug added summary functions for statistical computing (ACM SIGMOD 1982). Roth, Oszoyoglu et al. (1987) extended the model to allow nested data structures Clifford, Tansel, Navathe, and others have added time especifications into the model Current research is aimed at extending the model to support complex data objects, multimedia mgnt, hyperdata, geographical, temporal and logical processing. V. Matos - CIS611_LECTURE_NOTES_ALGEBRA.docx 2 THE RELATIONAL DATA MODEL (RM) and the Relational Algebra A relational database is a collection of relations A relation is a 2-dimensional table, in which each row represents a collection of related data values The values in a relation can be interpreted as a fact describing an entity or a relationship Relation name Attributes STUDENT Name SSN Address GPA Mary Poppins 111-22-3333 77 Picadilly St 4.00 Pepe Gonzalez 123-45-6789 123 Bonita Rd. 3.09 Tuples V. Sundarabatharan 999-88-7777 105 Calcara Ave. 3.87 Shi-Wua Yan 881-99-0101 778 Tienamen Sq. 3.88 V. Matos - CIS611_LECTURE_NOTES_ALGEBRA.docx 3 THE RELATIONAL DATA MODEL (RM) and the Relational Algebra Domains, Tuples, Attributes, and Relations A domain D is a set of atomic values.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 7 – Main Theme
    Database Systems Session 7 – Main Theme Functional Dependencies and Normalization Dr. Jean-Claude Franchitti New York University Computer Science Department Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Presentation material partially based on textbook slides Fundamentals of Database Systems (6th Edition) by Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Slides copyright © 2011 and on slides produced by Zvi Kedem copyight © 2014 1 Agenda 1 Session Overview 2 Logical Database Design - Normalization 3 Normalization Process Detailed 4 Summary and Conclusion 2 Session Agenda . Logical Database Design - Normalization . Normalization Process Detailed . Summary & Conclusion 3 What is the class about? . Course description and syllabus: » http://www.nyu.edu/classes/jcf/CSCI-GA.2433-001 » http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/spring15/CSCI-GA.2433-001/ . Textbooks: » Fundamentals of Database Systems (6th Edition) Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Addition Wesley ISBN-10: 0-1360-8620-9, ISBN-13: 978-0136086208 6th Edition (04/10) 4 Icons / Metaphors Information Common Realization Knowledge/Competency Pattern Governance Alignment Solution Approach 55 Agenda 1 Session Overview 2 Logical Database Design - Normalization 3 Normalization Process Detailed 4 Summary and Conclusion 6 Agenda . Informal guidelines for good design . Functional dependency . Basic tool for analyzing relational schemas . Informal Design Guidelines for Relation Schemas . Normalization: . 1NF, 2NF, 3NF, BCNF, 4NF, 5NF • Normal Forms Based on Primary Keys • General Definitions of Second and Third Normal Forms • Boyce-Codd Normal Form • Multivalued Dependency and Fourth Normal Form • Join Dependencies and Fifth Normal Form 7 Logical Database Design . We are given a set of tables specifying the database » The base tables, which probably are the community (conceptual) level . They may have come from some ER diagram or from somewhere else .
    [Show full text]
  • DML, Relational Algebra
    CS3200 – Database Design Spring 2018 Derbinsky SQL: Part 1 DML, Relational Algebra Lecture 3 SQL: Part 1 (DML, Relational Algebra) February 6, 2018 1 CS3200 – Database Design Spring 2018 Derbinsky Relational Algebra • The basic set of operations for the relational model – Note that the relational model assumes sets, so some of the database operations will not map • Allows the user to formally express a retrieval over one or more relations, as a relational algebra expression – Results in a new relation, which could itself be queried (i.e. composable) • Why is RA important? – Formal basis for SQL – Used in query optimization – Common vocabulary in data querying technology – Sometimes easier to understand the flow of complex SQL SQL: Part 1 (DML, Relational Algebra) February 6, 2018 2 CS3200 – Database Design Spring 2018 Derbinsky In the Beginning… Chamberlin, Donald D., and Raymond F. Boyce. "SEQUEL: A structured English query language." Proceedings of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) workshop on Data description, access and control. ACM, 1974. “In this paper we present the data manipulation facility for a structured English query language (SEQUEL) which can be used for accessing data in an integrated relational data base. Without resorting to the concepts of bound variables and quantifiers SEQUEL identifies a set of simple operations on tabular structures, which can be shown to be of equivalent power to the first order predicate calculus. A SEQUEL user is presented with a consistent set of keyword English templates which reflect how people use tables to obtain information. Moreover, the SEQUEL user is able to compose these basic templates in a structured manner in order to form more complex queries.
    [Show full text]