Quantum Correlations in Space-Time: Foundations and Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quantum Correlations in Space-Time: Foundations and Applications Quantum Correlations in Space-Time: Foundations and Applications Tian Zhang Somerville College University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Revised Version, 2020 Abstract The absolute/relative debate on the nature of space and time is ongoing for thousands of years. Here we attempt to investigate space and time from the information theoretic point of view to understand spatial and temporal correlations under the relative assumption. Correlations, as a measure of relationship between two quantities, do not distinguish space and time in classical probability theory; quantum correlations in space are well-studied but temporal correlations are not well understood. The thesis investigates quantum correlations in space-time, by treating temporal correlations equally in form as spatial correlations and unifying quantum correlations in space and time. In particular, we follow the pseudo- density matrix formalism in which quantum states in spacetime are properly defined by correlations from measurements. We first review classical correlations, quantum correlations in space and time, to motivate the pseudo-density matrix formalism in finite dimensions. Next we generalise the pseudo-density matrix formulation to continuous variables and general measurements. Specifically, we define Gaussian spacetime states by the first two statistical moments, and for general continuous variables spacetime states are defined via the Wigner function representation. We also define spacetime quantum states in position measurements and weak measurements for general measurement processes. Then we compare the pseudo-density matrix formalism with other spacetime formulations: indefinite causal structures, consistent his- tories, generalised non-local games, out-of-time-order correlation functions, and path integrals. We argue that in non-relativistic quantum mechanics, different arXiv:2101.08693v1 [quant-ph] 21 Jan 2021 spacetime formulations are closely related and almost equivalent via quantum correlations, except path integrals. Finally, we apply the pseudo-density matrix formulation to time crystals. By defining time crystals as long-range order in time, we analyse continuous and discrete time translation symmetry as well as discuss the existence of time crystals from an algebraic point of view. Finally, we summarise our work and provide the outlook for future directions. Quantum Correlations in Space-Time: Foundations and Applications Tian Zhang Somerville College University of Oxford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Revised Version, 2020 “Space and time are the pure forms thereof; sensation the matter.” — Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason Acknowledgements I find myself very lucky to have the opportunity to study at Oxford and around the world with so many talented mentors and friends, from whom I have learnt so much. I am very grateful for all the help and support they offer and would express my sincere gratitude to all who have made my DPhil days special. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Vlatko Vedral, for inviting me to his group, for insightful discussions during these years, and for his enthusiasm for physics which always inspires me. I would also like to thank Dr. Tristan Farrow, who is always so kind and thoughtful, like a big elder brother, not only teaches me how to cope with different academic situations, but also cares about my personal development. I am grateful to Prof. Oscar Dahlsten, who has invited me twice to SUSTech in Shenzhen, China, collaborated with me, especially for his patience on teaching me how to write my first paper, as well as continually giving me lots of guidance and feedback. I also thank Dr. Felix Tennie, who has been so patient and helpful to revise my first-year transfer report and all the suggestions on academic writing. I would like to thank Dr. Chiara Marletto, who collaborated with me on my first project on time crystals, for being so helpful and considerate to give me suggestions on research and writing. I would love to thank the rest of the group, including Anupama Unnikrishnan, Nana Liu, Christian Schilling, Davide Girolami, Reevu Maity, Pieter Bogaert, Thomas Elliott, Benjamin Yadin, Aditya Iyer, Jinzhao Sun, Sam Kuypers, David Felce, and Anicet Tibau Vidal. I would also like to thank the quantum group in the department of computer science, especially Prof. Giulio Chiribella and Prof. Jonathan Barrett for insightful discussion, and Prof. Bob Coecke and lots of others for organising interesting talks, conferences and Wolfson foundation discussions, from which I benefited a lot. Then I want to thank Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, in particular for the visiting graduate fellow program. I would love to thank my local host and advisor, Prof. Lucien Hardy, for inviting me to Perimeter, for regular meetings with me to answer my questions and check my progress, for always being so encouraging and telling me to think of big problems. It is a great pleasure to meet Prof. Lee Smolin at Perimeter and hold weekly meetings with him. I learned so many fascinating ideas and deep thoughts from Lee and gradually started to build on my own research taste. Thanks to Prof. Rafael Sorkin as well for being so patient and helpful and explaining to me on quantum measure theory, irreversibility, nonunitary, and lots of sightful conversation. And thanks to Beni Yoshida, for introducing the wonderful world of black hole information paradox to me and collaborating with me on the black hole final state projection proposal. I would also thank Guifre Vidal, for his guidance on organising the session of black hole information paradox in the quantum information workshop in Benasque, Spain. I would also love to thank the whole quantum foundation and quantum information group, Daniel Gottesman, Robert Spekkens, David Schmid, Tobias Fritz, Denis Rosset, Thomas Galley, Nitica Sakharwade, Zi-Wen Liu, Nick Hunter-Jones, and lots of others that I am sorry I cannot list for all, for having lunches and discussions together and always being so friendly and helpful. I had a brilliant time at Perimeter and I am so grateful for everyone there. I thank Prof. Xi Dong, for hosting my visit at Santa Barbara and discussing possible projects on holographic min- and max-entropy. I also want to thank the organisers and participants of Boulder Summer School 2018, for organising such a great quantum information summer school, where I learned so much and broadened my understanding of quantum information science. Thanks to Felix Leditzky, Graeme Smith, Mark M. Wilde for the opportunity to present my work at Rocky Mountain Summit on Quantum Information. Thanks to Hilary Carteret and John Donohue for inviting me to present my work at Institute of Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo. And thanks to Prof. Otfried Guehne for inviting me to visit and work with his group at University of Siegen. I am very grateful to Prof. Renato Renner at ETH Zurich and Prof. Simon Benjamin at Oxford Materials for being my examiners and all the discussion and suggestions for my thesis. I would thank my valuable friends at Oxford, at Perimeter Institute, at Boulder Summer School, at different conferences, from my undergraduate, Peking University and even long time before. I wish I could list all their names here but I am afraid there are too many of them and I am more afraid I may miss some of their names. Thank you so much, my dearest mum and dad. Thanks to all my family members for their love and understanding. I have had very difficult time during my DPhil. I am so grateful that I have received so much love and support to get through all the hard time. I would express my gratitude, again to so many people along the way for their companion. And thank you, my reader, for taking your time to have a look at this thesis. Abstract The absolute/relative debate on the nature of space and time is ongoing for thousands of years. Here we attempt to investigate space and time from the information theoretic point of view to understand spatial and temporal correlations under the relative assumption. Correlations, as a measure of relationship between two quantities, do not distinguish space and time in classical probability theory; quantum correlations in space are well-studied but temporal correlations are not well understood. The thesis investigates quantum correlations in space-time, by treating temporal correlations equally in form as spatial correlations and unifying quantum correlations in space and time. In particular, we follow the pseudo-density matrix formalism in which quantum states in spacetime are properly defined by correlations from measurements. We first review classical correlations, quantum correlations in space and time, to motivate the pseudo-density matrix formalism in finite dimensions. Next we generalise the pseudo-density matrix formulation to continuous variables and general measurements. Specifically, we define Gaussian spacetime states by the first two statistical moments, and for general continuous variables spacetime states are defined via the Wigner function representation. We also define spacetime quantum states in position measurements and weak measurements for general measurement processes. Then we compare the pseudo-density matrix formalism with other spacetime formulations: indefinite causal structures, consistent histories, generalised non-local games, out-of-time-order correlation functions, and path integrals. We argue that in non-relativistic quantum mechanics, different spacetime formulations are closely related and almost equivalent via quantum correlations, except path integrals. Finally, we apply the pseudo-density matrix formulation to time crystals. By defining time crystals as long-range order in time, we analyse continuous and discrete time translation symmetry as well as discuss the existence of time crystals from an algebraic point of view. Finally, we summarise our work and provide the outlook for future directions. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Quantum correlations in space-time 6 2.1 Classical correlations . .8 2.1.1 Correlations in probability theory .
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae PERSONAL INFORMATION Name: Borivoje Dakić Date of birth: 30.10.1980 Nationality: Serbian URL: https://dakic.univie.ac.at/ EDUCATION 2011 PhD in Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Austria. PhD Supervisor: Prof. Časlav Brukner 2007 M.Sc. in Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade, Serbia. M.Sc. Supervisor: Prof. Ivanka Milošević 2004 B.Sc. in Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade, Serbia. M.Sc. Supervisor: Prof. Milan Damnjanović CURRENT POSITION 2019 – Assistant professor, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna. PREVIOUS POSITIONS 2014 – 2018 Senior Postdoc, Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria., 2013 – 2014 Academic Visitor, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, UK, 2013 – 2014 Research Fellow, Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 2012 – 2013 Postdoctoral Researcher, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Austria. FELLOWSHIPS 2013 – 2014 Wolfson College Visiting Scholar, University of Oxford, UK (Visiting Scholars are standardly selected from senior academics – normally those who have reached the equivalent of professor, associate professor or UK University Lecturer level), 2010 Harvard University Fellow, CoQuS Secondment Program supported by FWF (Austrian Science Foundation), 2007 – 2011 FWF Fellow (CoQuS Doctoral Program). SUPERVISION OF GRADUATE STUDENTS AND POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWS 2019 – Joshua Morris, PhD Student (University of Vienna, Austria), 2018 – Flavio del Santo, PhD Student (co-supervised, University of Vienna, Austria), 2019 – Sebastian Horvat, Master student (University of Zagreb, Croatia), 2015 – Aleksandra Dimić, PhD Student (University of Belgrade, Serbia), 2015 – 2017 Milan Radonjić, Postdoc (University of Vienna, Austria), 2015 – 2017 Flavio del Santo, Master student (IQOQI, Vienna, Austria). 1 TEACHING ACTIVITIES 2017 – Lecturer, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Austria, 2016 – Visiting lecturer, Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Paradox Regarding Monogamy of Entanglement
    A paradox regarding monogamy of entanglement Anna Karlsson1;2 1Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Sciences 1 Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA 2Division of Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden Abstract In density matrix theory, entanglement is monogamous. However, we show that qubits can be arbitrarily entangled in a different, recently constructed model of qubit entanglement [1]. We illustrate the differences between these two models, analyse how the density matrix property of monogamy of entanglement originates in assumptions of classical correlations in the construc- tion of that model, and explain the counterexample to monogamy in the alternative model. We conclude that monogamy of entanglement is a theoretical assumption, not necessarily a phys- ical property, and discuss how contemporary theory relies on that assumption. The properties of entanglement entropy are very different in the two models — a priori, the entropy in the alternative model is classical. arXiv:1911.09226v2 [hep-th] 7 Feb 2020 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Indications of a presence of general entanglement . .2 1.2 Non-signalling and detection of general entanglement . .3 1.3 Summary and overview . .4 2 Analysis of the partial trace 5 3 A counterexample to monogamy of entanglement 5 4 Implications for entangled systems 7 A More details on the different correlation models 9 B Entropy in the orthogonal information model 11 C Correlations vs entanglement: a tolerance for deviations 14 1 Introduction The topic of this article is how to accurately model quantum correlations. In quantum theory, quan- tum systems are currently modelled by density matrices (ρ) and entanglement is recognized to be monogamous [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Do Black Holes Create Polyamory?
    Do black holes create polyamory? Andrzej Grudka1;4, Michael J. W. Hall2, Michał Horodecki3;4, Ryszard Horodecki3;4, Jonathan Oppenheim5, John A. Smolin6 1Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Pozna´n,Poland 2Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (Australian Research Council), Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia 3Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, University of Gda´nsk,Gda´nsk,Poland 4National Quantum Information Center of Gda´nsk,81–824 Sopot, Poland 5University College of London, Department of Physics & Astronomy, London, WC1E 6BT and London Interdisciplinary Network for Quantum Science and 6IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 Of course not, but if one believes that information cannot be destroyed in a theory of quantum gravity, then we run into apparent contradictions with quantum theory when we consider evaporating black holes. Namely that the no-cloning theorem or the principle of entanglement monogamy is violated. Here, we show that neither violation need hold, since, in arguing that black holes lead to cloning or non-monogamy, one needs to assume a tensor product structure between two points in space-time that could instead be viewed as causally connected. In the latter case, one is violating the semi-classical causal structure of space, which is a strictly weaker implication than cloning or non-monogamy. This is because both cloning and non-monogamy also lead to a breakdown of the semi-classical causal structure. We show that the lack of monogamy that can emerge in evaporating space times is one that is allowed in quantum mechanics, and is very naturally related to a lack of monogamy of correlations of outputs of measurements performed at subsequent instances of time of a single system.
    [Show full text]
  • Firewalls and the Quantum Properties of Black Holes
    Firewalls and the Quantum Properties of Black Holes A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from the College of William and Mary by Dylan Louis Veyrat Advisor: Marc Sher Senior Research Coordinator: Gina Hoatson Date: May 10, 2015 1 Abstract With the proposal of black hole complementarity as a solution to the information paradox resulting from the existence of black holes, a new problem has become apparent. Complementarity requires a vio- lation of monogamy of entanglement that can be avoided in one of two ways: a violation of Einstein’s equivalence principle, or a reworking of Quantum Field Theory [1]. The existence of a barrier of high-energy quanta - or “firewall” - at the event horizon is the first of these two resolutions, and this paper aims to discuss it, for Schwarzschild as well as Kerr and Reissner-Nordstr¨omblack holes, and to compare it to alternate proposals. 1 Introduction, Hawking Radiation While black holes continue to present problems for the physical theories of today, quite a few steps have been made in the direction of understanding the physics describing them, and, consequently, in the direction of a consistent theory of quantum gravity. Two of the most central concepts in the effort to understand black holes are the black hole information paradox and the existence of Hawking radiation [2]. Perhaps the most apparent result of black holes (which are a consequence of general relativity) that disagrees with quantum principles is the possibility of information loss. Since the only possible direction in which to pass through the event horizon is in, toward the singularity, it would seem that information 2 entering a black hole could never be retrieved.
    [Show full text]
  • The QBIT Theory of Consciousness
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 26 August 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201905.0352.v4 The QBIT theory of consciousness Majid Beshkar Tehran University of Medical Sciences [email protected] [email protected] Abstract The QBIT theory is an attempt toward solving the problem of consciousness based on empirical evidence provided by various scientific disciplines including quantum mechanics, biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. This theory formulates the problem of consciousness in the following four questions, and provides preliminary answers for each question: Question 1: What is the nature of qualia? Answer: A quale is a superdense pack of quantum information encoded in maximally entangled pure states. Question 2: How are qualia generated? Answer: When a pack of quantum information is compressed beyond a certain threshold, a quale is generated. Question 3: Why are qualia subjective? Answer: A quale is subjective because a pack of information encoded in maximally entangled pure states are essentially private and unshareable. Question 4: Why does a quale have a particular meaning? Answer: A pack of information within a cognitive system gradually obtains a particular meaning as it undergoes a progressive process of interpretation performed by an internal model installed in the system. This paper introduces the QBIT theory of consciousness, and explains its basic assumptions and conjectures. Keywords: Coherence; Compression; Computation; Consciousness; Entanglement; Free-energy principle; Generative model; Information; Qualia; Quantum; Representation 1 © 2019 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 26 August 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201905.0352.v4 Introduction The problem of consciousness is one of the most difficult problems in biology, which has remained unresolved despite several decades of scientific research.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetrized Persistency of Bell Correlations for Dicke States and GHZ-Based Mixtures: Studying the Limits of Monogamy
    Symmetrized persistency of Bell correlations for Dicke states and GHZ-based mixtures: Studying the limits of monogamy Marcin Wieśniak ( [email protected] ) University of Gdańsk Research Article Keywords: quantum correlations, Bell correlations, GHZ mixtures, Dicke states Posted Date: February 26th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-241777/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at Scientic Reports on July 12th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93786-5. Symmetrized persistency of Bell correlations for Dicke states and GHZ-based mixtures: Studying the limits of monogamy. Marcin Wiesniak´ 1,2,* 1Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics,, University of Gdansk,´ 80-308 Gdansk,´ Poland 2International Centre for Theory of Quantum Techologies, University of Gdansk,´ 80-308 Gdansk,´ Poland *[email protected] ABSTRACT Quantum correlations, in particular those, which enable to violate a Bell inequality1, open a way to advantage in certain communication tasks. However, the main difficulty in harnessing quantumness is its fragility to, e.g, noise or loss of particles. We study the persistency of Bell correlations of GHZ based mixtures and Dicke states. For the former, we consider quantum communication complexity reduction (QCCR) scheme, and propose new Bell inequalities (BIs), which can be used in that scheme for higher persistency in the limit of large number of particles N. In case of Dicke states, we show that persistency can reach 0.482N, significantly more than reported in previous studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Entanglement in the 21St Century
    Quantum entanglement in the 21 st century John Preskill The Quantum Century: 100 Years of the Bohr Atom 3 October 2013 My well-worn copy, bought in 1966 when I was 13. George Gamow, recalling Bohr’s Theoretical Physics Institute 1928-31: Bohr’s Institute quickly became the world center of quantum physics, and to paraphrase the old Romans, “all roads led to Blegdamsvej 17” … The popularity of the institute was due both to the genius of its director and his kind, one might say fatherly, heart … Almost every country in the world has physicists who proudly say: “I used to work with Bohr.” Thirty Years That Shook Physics , 1966, p. 51. George Gamow, recalling Bohr’s Theoretical Physics Institute 1928-31: Bohr, Fru Bohr, Casimir, and I were returning home from the farewell dinner for Oscar Klein on the occasion of his election as a university professor in his native Sweden. At that late hour the streets of the city were empty. On the way home we passed a bank building with walls of large cement blocks. At the corner of the building the crevices between the courses of the blocks were deep enough to give a toehold to a good alpinist. Casimir, an expert climber, scrambled up almost to the third floor. When Cas came down, Bohr, inexperienced as he was, went up to match the deed. When he was hanging precariously on the second-floor level, and Fru Bohr, Casimir, and I were anxiously watching his progress, two Copenhagen policeman approached from behind with their hands on their gun holsters.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering of Entanglement and Spin State Transfer Via Quantum Chains
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Engineering of entanglement and spin state transfer via quantum chains of atomic spins at large Received: 19 April 2018 Accepted: 29 August 2018 separations Published: xx xx xxxx Dmitry I. Bazhanov1,2,3, Ilia N. Sivkov4 & Valeri S. Stepanyuk1 Several recent experiments have shown that long-range exchange interactions can determine collective magnetic ground states of nanostructures in bulk and on surfaces. The ability to generate and control entanglement in a system with long-range interaction will be of great importance for future quantum technology. An important step forward to reach this goal is the creation of entangled states for spins of distant magnetic atoms. Herein, the generation of long-distance entanglement between remote spins at large separations in bulk and on surface is studied theoretically, based on a quantum spin Hamiltonian and time-dependent Schrödinger equation for experimentally realized conditions. We demonstrate that long-distance entanglement can be generated between remote spins by using an appropriate quantum spin chain (a quantum mediator), composed by sets of antiferromagnetically coupled spin dimers. Ground state properties and quantum spin dynamics of entangled atoms are studied. We demonstrate that one can increase or suppress entanglement by adding a single spin in the mediator. The obtained result is explained by monogamy property of entanglement distribution inside a quantum spin system. We present a novel approach for non-local sensing of remote magnetic adatoms via spin entanglement. In diverse systems, long-range interactions between magnetic adatoms on surfaces were investigated both the- oretically and in experiments1–11. Indirect coupling can be mediated by surface and bulk electrons(RKKY), superexchange or can be of dipole-dipole origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Monogamy of Correlations Versus Monogamy of Entanglement
    Quantum Inf Process (2010) 9:273–294 DOI 10.1007/s11128-009-0161-6 Monogamy of correlations versus monogamy of entanglement M. P. Seevinck Received: 31 July 2009 / Accepted: 21 December 2009 / Published online: 16 January 2010 © The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract A fruitful way of studying physical theories is via the question whether the possible physical states and different kinds of correlations in each theory can be shared to different parties. Over the past few years it has become clear that both quan- tum entanglement and non-locality (i.e., correlations that violate Bell-type inequali- ties) have limited shareability properties and can sometimes even be monogamous. We give a self-contained review of these results and present new results on the shareability of different kinds of correlations, including local, quantum and no-signalling corre- lations. This includes an alternative simpler proof of the Toner-Verstraete monogamy inequality for quantum correlations, as well as a strengthening thereof. Further, the relationship between sharing non-local quantum correlations and sharing mixed entan- gled states is investigated, and already for the simplest case of bi-partite correlations and qubits this is shown to be non-trivial. Also, a recently proposed new interpretation of Bell’s theorem by Schumacher in terms of shareability of correlations is critically assessed. Finally, the relevance of monogamy of non-local correlations for secure quantum key distribution is pointed out, and in this regard it is stressed that not all non-local correlations are monogamous. Keywords Quantum mechanics · Entanglement · Non-locality · Monogamy · No-signalling · Shareability · Cryptography M.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalised Monogamy Relation of Convex-Roof Extended Negativity In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Generalised monogamy relation of convex-roof extended negativity in multi-level systems Received: 29 June 2016 Tian Tian, Yu Luo & Yongming Li Accepted: 19 October 2016 In this paper, we investigate the generalised monogamy inequalities of convex-roof extended Published: 18 November 2016 negativity (CREN) in multi-level systems. The generalised monogamy inequalities provide the upper and lower bounds of bipartite entanglement, which are obtained by using CREN and the CREN of assistance (CRENOA). Furthermore, we show that the CREN of multi-qubit pure states satisfies some monogamy relations. Additionally, we test the generalised monogamy inequalities for qudits by considering the partially coherent superposition of a generalised W-class state in a vacuum and show that the generalised monogamy inequalities are satisfied in this case as well. Quantum entanglement is one of the most important physical resources in quantum information processing1–4. As distinguished from classical correlations, quantum entanglement cannot be freely shared among many objects. We call this important phenomenon of quantum entanglement monogamy5,6. The property of monogamy may be as fundamental as the no-cloning theorem7, which gives rise to structures of entanglement in multipartite settings8,9. Some monogamy inequalities have been studied to apply entanglement to more useful quantum infor- mation processing. The property of monogamy property has been considered in many areas of physics: it can be used to extract an estimate of the quantity of information about a secret key captured by an eavesdropper in quantum cryptography10,11, as well as the frustration effects observed in condensed matter physics12,13 and even black-hole physics14,15.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Cryptography: Key Distribution and Beyond
    Quantum Cryptography: Key Distribution and Beyond Akshata Shenoy-Hejamadi 1, Anirban Pathak 2 & Srikanth Radhakrishna 3 1 Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, India. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Poornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research, Bangalore, India. E-mail: [email protected] Editors: Subhash Kak, Tabish Qureshi & Danko Georgiev Article history: Submitted on December 21, 2016; Accepted on May 10, 2017; Published on June 18, 2017; Corrected on February 15, 2018. niquely among the sciences, quantum cryptog- in e-commerce today. RSA in today’s world is safe so raphy has driven both foundational research long as a scalable quantum computer remains unfeasible. Uas well as practical real-life applications. We However, ideally, we wish to guarantee cryptographic review the progress of quantum cryptography in the security that follows only from basic physics. This is the last decade, covering quantum key distribution and promise of quantum cryptography. other applications. In particular, note the recent report on a loophole-free Quanta 2017; 6: 1–47. test of Bell’s inequality [2], thereby conclusively veri- fying the existence of quantum nonlocality in Nature, 1 Introduction and also attesting to the advancement of experimental techniques to prepare, transmit, manipulate and measure Cryptography is the technique of concealing confiden- quantum information. Another direction in cryptography tial information using physical or mathematical means. is to provide practicable tools embracing experimental While cryptologists find newer methods to conceal a se- limitations, e.g. quantum key distribution with pulses cret, cryptanalysts devise powerful methods to compro- having mean photon number much larger than one [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Biology: Current Status and Opportunities
    An international interdisciplinary workshop Quantum Biology: Current Status and Opportunities 17-18 September 2012 University of Surrey, UK Programme Our Sponsors BBSRC The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Is the UK’s principal public founder of basic and strategic research across the biosciences. Part of the BBSRC’s mission Is to promote public awareness and discussion about issues surrounding how bioscience research is conducted in the applications of research outcomes. www.bbsrc.ac.uk The Institute of Advanced Studies The Institute of Advanced Studies at the University of Surrey hosts small-scale, scientific and scholarly meetings of leading academics from all over the world to discuss specialist topics away from the pressure of everyday work. The events are multidisciplinary, bringing together scholars from different disciplines to share alternative perspectives on common problems. www.ias.surrey.ac.uk MILES (Models and Mathematics in Life and Social Sciences), University of Surrey MILES is a programme of events and funding opportunities to stimulate Surrey’s interdisciplinary research. MILES initiates and fosters projects that bring together academics from mathematics, engineering, computing and physical sciences with those from the life sciences, social sciences, arts, humanities and beyond. www.miles.surrey.ac.uk Quantum Biology: Current Status and Opportunities Introduction Sixty years ago, Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, puzzled over one of deepest mysteries: what makes genes so durable that they can be passed down through hundreds of generations virtually unchanged? To provide an answer, Schrödinger looked towards the science that he helped to build. In his book, “What is Life?” (first published in 1944), he suggested that life was unique in that some of its properties are generated, not by the familiar statistical laws of classical science, but by the strange and counterintuitive rules of quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]