DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Rough-Winged Swallow (Seiurus Noveboracensis) Richard A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Rough-Winged Swallow (Seiurus Noveboracensis) Richard A Northern Rough-winged Swallow (Seiurus noveboracensis) Richard A. Wolinski Holland Ponds Park, Macomb Co., MI 5/28/2006 © Jerry McHale (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) If the title of “swallow most likely to be human activity and structures likely resulted in some increase in nesting density in areas overlooked” is to be applied, the Rough-winged previously devoid of natural nest sites as the would be the swallow of choice. Easily human population expanded. Distribution is confused with the Bank Swallow due to overall therefore tied to nest site availability rather than coloration and choice of nesting sites, the more to a specific vegetative cover type or open solitary Rough-winged is often not identified water. even when observed. Familiarity with its flight call is often the best way to confirm The northernmost Michigan record reported by identification at a distance. Cook (1893) was of a dead bird on Mackinac Island in 1890. Its distribution in the UP was The Northern Rough-winged Swallow is better understood by the 1950s, having been generally distributed across the continent reported breeding from Luce and Schoolcraft ranging into the southernmost portions of all the Counties (Wood 1951) and later observed in Canadian provinces save British Columbia, Marquette, Iron, Houghton, and Baraga where it is found well northward to southeastern Counties (Zimmerman and Van Tyne 1959). Alaska. To the south, the species is found in The species was considered a fairly common Mexico southward into northern Costa Rica, summer resident north to the Straits of western Honduras, and northwestern Nicaragua Mackinaw by Zimmerman and Van Tyne (1959) (DeJong 1996). and as a common summer resident and local throughout the state by Payne (1983). The Distribution Rough-winged was considered an uncommon Before European settlement, distribution of the summer resident in the northwest portion of the species within Michigan would presumably LP (Pettingill 1974, Francke and Graf 1994) and have been widespread and local, tied to those a common summer resident in Isabella County situations where Bank Swallow and Belted (Cuthbert 1963) in the southern portion of this Kingfisher burrows were to be found in the same region. eroded banks of streams and rivers, or to crevices and crannies in rock faces that provided some overhead cover. Nesting sites afforded by © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center Northern Rough-winged Swallow (Seiurus noveboracensis) Richard A. Wolinski Results of MBBA I verified the general decline over the same time period, may be historical view of the species’ distribution as hidden in the statewide trend analysis and hide most robust in the southern and central LP eco-region effects on abundance. The upward decreasing northward into the UP, with more trend data conflict with the atlas block data that occupied blocks in the western UP than in the show a decrease in the number of occupied eastern UP (particularly Luce, Mackinaw, and blocks across the state more consistent with the Chippewa Counties). The general distribution Bird Conservation Region BBS analysis (Sauer of breeding records remained the same between et al. 2008). MBBA I and MBBA II, though differences were most apparent in terms of the total number of The loss of occupied atlas blocks is perhaps a occupied blocks in the northern portions of the reflection that the Rough-winged Swallow range in the northern LP and UP; though some population is reaching saturation, with the counties in the southern LP also had fewer available artificial nest sites and any increases occupied blocks. tied to an expanding Bank Swallow population. If so, more Rough-wingeds per observation may Breeding Biology be responsible for the perceived increase in Unlike the Bank Swallow that remains tied abundance as more pairs are typically associated exclusively to natural sites for nest placement, with Bank Swallow colonies (Turner and Rose the Rough-winged displays the ability to utilize 1989) or at loose colonies (DeJong 1996). This cavities afforded by human structures. These is in contrast to a situation in Ontario include bridges, dry drain pipes, and various (Sandilands 2007) where the non-significant cavities in buildings, though they can be found decline (based upon comparison of regional and investigating a wide variety of potential nest all Canadian BBS route data) may be tied to the sites, including the undersides of parked semi- distribution of the declining Bank Swallow trailers and the interiors of open garages (Kelley population. 1978). Conservation Needs Abundance and Population Trends Despite some indication that the Rough-winged (Click to view trends from the BBS) population has declined in the northernmost The Rough-winged has been expanding its portion of its range in Michigan based upon range northward for over 100 years (DeJong atlas block occupancy, there appears to be no 1996). Results of the BBS continent-wide and need for management action. for the Great Lakes Region (Robbins et al. 1986) showed a significant increase between Literature Cited 1966 and 1979; the statistically significant trend estimate from 1966-2000 for the upper Midwest Cook, A.J. 1893. Birds of Michigan, 2nd edition. is 1.2% per year (Kleen et al. 2004). The Bulletin 94. Michigan Agricultural Michigan BBS data suggest a significant Experimental Station, Lansing, MI. upward trend from 1983-2007 of 2.66%, though Cuthbert, N.L. 1963. The Birds of Isabella these data should be viewed with care. The County, Michigan. Edwards Brothers, Inc. Michigan BBS data from 1994-2003 offer a Ann Arbor, MI. comparison of routes in the UP and northern LP DeJong, M.J. 1996. Northern Rough-winged showing fewer birds/route (0.5 -1.0) than the Swallow (Stelgidopteryx serripennis). In number of birds/route (1.0-3.0) in the southern The Birds of North America, No. 234 (A. portion of the state (Sauer et al 2008). Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North Differences in abundance compared with Bird America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. Conservation Regions, which show an overall © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center Northern Rough-winged Swallow (Seiurus noveboracensis) Richard A. Wolinski Franke, C., and L. Graf. 1994. Birds of Wood, N.P. 1951. The Birds of Michigan. Leelanau County and Sleeping Bear Dunes MP75. University of Michigan Museum of National Lakeshore: An Annotated Zoology. Ann Arbor, MI. Checklist. Leelanau Conservancy. Leland, Zimmerman, D.A., and J. Van Tyne. 1959. A MI. Distributional Checklist of the Birds of Kelley, A.H. 1978. Birds of Southeastern Michigan. OP 608. University of Michigan Michigan and Southwestern Ontario. Museum of Zoology. Ann Arbor, MI. Bulletin 57. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI. Suggested Citation Kleen, V.M., L. Cordle, and R.A. Montgomery. 2004. The Illinois Breeding Bird Atlas. Wolinski, R.A. 2011. Northern Rough-winged Illinois Natural History Survey. Swallow (Seiurus noveboracensis). In Champaign, IL. Chartier, A.T., J.J. Baldy, and J.M. Payne, R.B. 1983. A Distributional Checklist Brenneman (eds.). 2010. The Second of the Birds of Michigan. MP 164. Michigan Breeding Bird Atlas. Kalamazoo University of Michigan Museum of Nature Center. Kalamazoo, MI. Accessed Zoology. Ann Arbor, MI. online at: <www.mibirdatlas.org/Portals/ Pettingill, O.S., Jr. 1974. Ornithology at the 12/MBA2010/NRWSaccount.pdf >. University of Michigan Biological Station and the Birds of the Region. Special Pub. No. 1. Kalamazoo Nature Center, Kalamazoo, MI. Robbins, C.S., D. Bystrak, and P.H. Geissler. 1986. The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965-1979. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication No. 157. Washington, D.C. Sandilands, A. 2007. Northern Rough-winged Swallow (Stelgidopteryx serripennis). In Cadman, M.D., D.A. Sutherland, G.G. Beck, D. Lepage, and A.R. Couturier (eds). 2007. Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario, 2001-2005. Bird Studies Canada, Environment Canada, Ontario Field Ornithologists, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and Ontario Nature. Toronto, Ontario. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, J. Fallon. 2008. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2007. Version 5.15.2008. USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. Laurel, MD. Turner, A., and C. Rose. 1989. Swallows and Martins: An Identification Guide and Handbook. Hougton Mifflin Company. Boston, MA. © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Costa Rica 2020
    Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Photos: Talamanca Hummingbird, Sunbittern, Resplendent Quetzal, Congenial Group! Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Leaders: Frank Mantlik & Vernon Campos Report and photos by Frank Mantlik Highlights and top sightings of the trip as voted by participants Resplendent Quetzals, multi 20 species of hummingbirds Spectacled Owl 2 CR & 32 Regional Endemics Bare-shanked Screech Owl 4 species Owls seen in 70 Black-and-white Owl minutes Suzy the “owling” dog Russet-naped Wood-Rail Keel-billed Toucan Great Potoo Tayra!!! Long-tailed Silky-Flycatcher Black-faced Solitaire (& song) Rufous-browed Peppershrike Amazing flora, fauna, & trails American Pygmy Kingfisher Sunbittern Orange-billed Sparrow Wayne’s insect show-and-tell Volcano Hummingbird Spangle-cheeked Tanager Purple-crowned Fairy, bathing Rancho Naturalista Turquoise-browed Motmot Golden-hooded Tanager White-nosed Coati Vernon as guide and driver January 29 - Arrival San Jose All participants arrived a day early, staying at Hotel Bougainvillea. Those who arrived in daylight had time to explore the phenomenal gardens, despite a rain storm. Day 1 - January 30 Optional day-trip to Carara National Park Guides Vernon and Frank offered an optional day trip to Carara National Park before the tour officially began and all tour participants took advantage of this special opportunity. As such, we are including the sightings from this day trip in the overall tour report. We departed the Hotel at 05:40 for the drive to the National Park. En route we stopped along the road to view a beautiful Turquoise-browed Motmot.
    [Show full text]
  • Aves: Hirundinidae)
    1 2 Received Date : 19-Jun-2016 3 Revised Date : 14-Oct-2016 4 Accepted Date : 19-Oct-2016 5 Article type : Original Research 6 7 8 Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae) 9 Running Title: Social swallows are morphologically convergent 10 Authors: Allison E. Johnson1*, Jonathan S. Mitchell2, Mary Bomberger Brown3 11 Affiliations: 12 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago 13 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan 14 3 School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska 15 Contact: 16 Allison E. Johnson*, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E 57th Street, 17 Chicago, IL 60637, phone: 773-702-3070, email: [email protected] 18 Jonathan S. Mitchell, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 19 Ruthven Museums Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, email: [email protected] 20 Mary Bomberger Brown, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Hardin Hall, 3310 21 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583, phone: 402-472-8878, email: [email protected] 22 23 *Corresponding author. 24 Data archiving: Social and morphological data and R code utilized for data analysis have been 25 submitted as supplementary material associated with this manuscript. 26 27 Abstract: BehavioralAuthor Manuscript shifts can initiate morphological evolution by pushing lineages into new adaptive 28 zones. This has primarily been examined in ecological behaviors, such as foraging, but social behaviors 29 may also alter morphology. Swallows and martins (Hirundinidae) are aerial insectivores that exhibit a This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Nest Construction in Swallows (Hirundinidae) Is Associated with the Decrease of Clutch Size
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 38/1 711-716 21.7.2006 The evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is associated with the decrease of clutch size P. HENEBERG A b s t r a c t : Variability of the nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is more diverse than in other families of oscine birds. I compared the nest-building behaviour with pooled data of clutch size and overall hatching success for 20 species of swallows. The clutch size was significantly higher in temperate cavity-adopting swallow species than in species using other nesting modes including species breeding in evolutionarily advanced mud nests (P<0.05) except of the burrow-excavating Bank Swallow. Decrease of the clutch size during the evolution of nest construction is not compensated by the increase of the overall hatching success. K e y w o r d s : Hirundinidae, nest construction, clutch size, evolution Birds use distinct methods to avoid nest-predation: active nest defence, nest camouflage and concealment or sheltered nesting. While large and powerful species prefer active nest-defence, swallows and martins usually prefer construction of sheltered nests (LLOYD 2004). The nests of swallows vary from natural cavities in trees and rocks, to self-exca- vated burrows to mud retorts and cups attached to vertical faces. Much attention has been devoted to the importance of controlling for phylogeny in com- parative tests (HARVEY & PAGEL 1991), including molecular phylogenetic studies of swallows (WINKLER & SHELDON 1993). Interactions between the nest-construction va- riability and the clutch size, however, had been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Head-Scratching Method in Swallows Depends on Behavioral Context
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 679 shoulder-spot display during their observations of behavior in partridges. In all cases that I observed, the shoulder spot appeared to be a fear or flight intention display as described by Lumsden (1970). However, the display seemed secondary in importance compared to vocalizations and “tail flicking” during periods of extreme alarm. Examination of the shoul- der spot of a partridge confirmed the realignment of white underwing coverts to the top of the wing in the patagial region. The manipulation by the bird of underwing feathers appeared to be identical to that of Ruffed Grouse (Bonusa umbellus)(Garbutt 198 1). Since “display” implies actual communication between individuals further investigation is needed to de- termine if, in fact, the shoulder spot actually is serving a communication function in Gray Partridge. The shoulder spot in Gray Partridges and the display seen in grouse are morphologically similar. Lumsden (1970) concluded that the widespread occurrence of this display among grouse indicated it appeared relatively early in evolution. The morphological and behavioral similarities between the display in grouse and partridges suggest that the shoulder spot may have evolved even earlier. Since this is an escape behavior, and since many species of partridges and pheasants are difficult to observe in the wild, it may have been overlooked. Acknowledgments.-Theseobservations were made while the author was supported by funds from the North Dakota Game and Fish Department through Pittman-Robertson Project W-67-R. Additional support was provided by the Biology Department and Institute for Ecological Studies at the University of North Dakota. Helpful editorial comments were provided by R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of Costa Rica March 19–31, 2019
    THE BEST OF COSTA RICA MARCH 19–31, 2019 Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge © David Ascanio LEADERS: DAVID ASCANIO & MAURICIO CHINCHILLA LIST COMPILED BY: DAVID ASCANIO VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM THE BEST OF COSTA RICA March 19–31, 2019 By David Ascanio Photo album: https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidascanio/albums/72157706650233041 It’s about 02:00 AM in San José, and we are listening to the widespread and ubiquitous Clay-colored Robin singing outside our hotel windows. Yet, it was still too early to experience the real explosion of bird song, which usually happens after dawn. Then, after 05:30 AM, the chorus started when a vocal Great Kiskadee broke the morning silence, followed by the scratchy notes of two Hoffmann´s Woodpeckers, a nesting pair of Inca Doves, the ascending and monotonous song of the Yellow-bellied Elaenia, and the cacophony of an (apparently!) engaged pair of Rufous-naped Wrens. This was indeed a warm welcome to magical Costa Rica! To complement the first morning of birding, two boreal migrants, Baltimore Orioles and a Tennessee Warbler, joined the bird feast just outside the hotel area. Broad-billed Motmot . Photo: D. Ascanio © Victor Emanuel Nature Tours 2 The Best of Costa Rica, 2019 After breakfast, we drove towards the volcanic ring of Costa Rica. Circling the slope of Poas volcano, we eventually reached the inspiring Bosque de Paz. With its hummingbird feeders and trails transecting a beautiful moss-covered forest, this lodge offered us the opportunity to see one of Costa Rica´s most difficult-to-see Grallaridae, the Scaled Antpitta.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Mangrove Swallow Recorded in the United States
    The First Mangrove Swallow recorded in the United States INTRODUCTION tem with a one-lane unsurfaced road on top, Paul W. Sykes, Jr. The Space Coast Birding and Wildlife Festival make up the wetland part of the facility (Fig- USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center was held at Titusville, Brevard County, ures 1 and 2). The impoundments comprise a Florida on 13–17 November 2002. During total of 57 hectares (140 acres), are kept Warnell School of Forest Resources the birding competition on the last day of the flooded much of the time, and present an festival, the Canadian Team reported seeing open expanse of shallow water in an other- The University of Georgia several distant swallows at Brevard County’s wise xeric landscape. Patches of emergent South Central Regional Wastewater Treat- freshwater vegetation form mosaics across Athens, Georgia 30602-2152 ment Facility known as Viera Wetlands. open water within each impoundment and in They thought these were either Cliff the shallows along the dikes. A few trees and (email: [email protected]) (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) or Cave (P. fulva) aquatic shrubs are scattered across these wet- Swallows. lands. Following his participation at the festival, At about 0830 EST on the 18th, Gardler Gardler looked for the swallows on 18 stopped on the southmost dike of Cell 1 Lyn S. Atherton November. The man-made Viera Wetlands (Figure 2) to observe swallows foraging low are well known for waders, waterfowl, rap- over the water and flying into the strong 1100 Pinellas Bayway, I-3 tors, shorebirds, and open-country passer- north-to-northwest wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area
    Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area Jeremy Beaulieu Lisa Andreano Michael Walgren Introduction The following is a guide to the common birds of the Estero Bay Area. Brief descriptions are provided as well as active months and status listings. Photos are primarily courtesy of Greg Smith. Species are arranged by family according to the Sibley Guide to Birds (2000). Gaviidae Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: A small loon seldom seen far from salt water. In the non-breeding season they have a grey face and red throat. They have a long slender dark bill and white speckling on their dark back. Information: These birds are winter residents to the Central Coast. Wintering Red- throated Loons can gather in large numbers in Morro Bay if food is abundant. They are common on salt water of all depths but frequently forage in shallow bays and estuaries rather than far out at sea. Because their legs are located so far back, loons have difficulty walking on land and are rarely found far from water. Most loons must paddle furiously across the surface of the water before becoming airborne, but these small loons can practically spring directly into the air from land, a useful ability on its artic tundra breeding grounds. Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: The Pacific Loon has a shorter neck than the Red-throated Loon. The bill is very straight and the head is very smoothly rounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Birds, Index, 2000–2009
    WESTERN BIRDS, INDEX, 2000–2009 Volumes 31 (2000), 32 (2001), 33 (2002), 34 (2003), 35 (2004), 36 (2005), 37 (2006), 38 (2007), 39 (2008), and 40 (2009) Compiled by Daniel D. Gibson abeillei, Icterus bullockii—38:99 acadicus, Aegolius acadicus—36:30; 40:98 Accentor, Siberian—31:57; 36:38, 40, 50–51 Accipiter cooperii—31:218; 33:34–50; 34:66, 207; 35:83; 36:259; 37:215–227; 38:133; 39:202 gentilis—35:112; 39:194; 40:78, 128 striatus—32:101, 107; 33:18, 34–50; 34:66; 35:108–113; 36:196; 37:12, 215–227; 38:133; 40:78, 128 Acevedo, Marcos—32:see Arnaud, G. aciculatus, Agelaius phoeniceus—35:229 Acridotheres javanicus—34:123 Acrocephalus schoenobaenus—39:196 actia, Eremophila alpestris—36:228 Actitis hypoleucos—36:49 macularia—32:108, 145–166; 33:69–98, 134–174, 222–240; 34:68 macularius—35:62–70, 77–87, 186, 188, 194–195; 36:207; 37:1–7, 12, 34; 40:81 acuflavidus, Thalasseus sandvicensis—40:231 adastus, Empidonax traillii—32:37; 33:184; 34:125; 35:197; 39:8 Aechmophorus clarkii—34:62, 133–148; 36:144–145; 38:104, 126, 132 occidentalis—34:62, 133–148; 36:144, 145, 180; 37:34; 38:126; 40:58, 75, 132–133 occidentalis/clarkii—34:62 (sp.)—35:126–146 Aegolius acadicus—32:110; 34:72, 149–156; 35:176; 36:30, 303–309; 38:107, 115–116; 40:98 funereus—36:30; 40:98 Aeronautes montivagus—34:207 saxatalis—31:220; 34:73, 186–198, 199–203, 204–208, 209–215, 216–224, 245; 36:218; 37:29, 35, 149–155; 38:82, 134, 261–267 aestiva, Dendroica petechia—40:297 Aethia cristatella—36:29; 37:139–148, 197, 199, 210 psittacula—31:14; 33:1, 14; 34:163; 36:28; 37:95, 139,
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Bird Notes of Grace Mccormac French of Yamhill County, Oregon
    Studies In OregonOrnithology N o.2 A Guide to the BirdNotes of Grace M cCo r mac French of Yamhill County, Oregon Range D.Bayer SWALLOWS ARE BACK Mrs. French on Albino Birds To the Editor: Whilewe were In commentinglately uponthe suburban eatingSunday breakfasta tele- phone message came announc- advent of analbinorobin it was suggested on ing the arrival of the swallows this pagethatsuchbirdsare more or less in the yard of Mr. and Mrs. feathered rela- Howard Coleman on the shore made outcastby their nornielly of Carlton lake. This year two tives. This particular specimen,for, instance, tree swallows were the firstar- never was seen with.companions. But a letter rivals. Some yearsthe earliest from thebird woman, Grace MacCormac dateisfortheviolet-green swallow.My spring records for French,who usedto keep tabs on the, swal- thefirstswallowsbeganin lows near Carlton, but now lives at` Dayton; 1915. It might interest you to know tells us that she has known albino robins that I have another albino to add to my list. It was a junco GardenClub Hears with white body and pearl gray head and tail. It fed in the yard BirdLore Talk between December22 and Jan- uary17. By Mrs. French GRACE McC. FRENCH, Mrs. Grace MacCormac French, P. O. Box471, Dayton. recognizedasanauthorityon birds, spoke beforethe MZMinn- ville Garden Club at their meet- ingMonday, 'March17.In addi- 8tgns of the Seasons tiontospeakingon theday's topic, "How To AttractBirds", Mrs. French told of many of her By Grace McCormac French observationsand amusinginci- The springmigrationofthe dents which occurredduring the birds always attracts much atten- thirty-two yearsthey resided on tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Swallow, Northern Rough-Winged
    392 Swallows — Family Hirundinidae Northern Rough-winged Swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis As the fan palm to the Hooded Oriole, so the box-frame bridge to the Northern Rough-winged Swallow—an accoutrement of southern California civilization opens a door of opportunity to a bird preadapted to capitalize on it. Armed only with the flexibility it shares with many species programmed to nest in cavities, the Rough-winged Swallow has maintained its status as a common summer resident. It is even more common in migration but rare in winter. Photo by Anthony Mercieca Breeding distribution: The Northern Rough-winged Swallow is widespread in San Diego County’s coastal The Rough-winged Swallow is not colonial, so large lowland, becoming scarcer and patchier at higher eleva- numbers are usually of migrants rather than of breeding tions. It is absent as a breeding bird from Point Loma birds. But if suitable nest sites are clumped—as with sever- and Coronado. A few pairs nest as high in the mountains al drain holes under a single bridge—multiple pairs often as about 4000 feet, as at Pine Hills (K19; nest build- nest in amity. From 1997 to 2001, the largest numbers ing 5 May 2001, S. E. Smith) and near Green Valley were reported consistently from lower Los Peñasquitos Falls Campground (N20; nest building 23 May 1999, B. Canyon (N8), up to 150 on 2 May 1999 (P. A. Ginsburg). Siegel). In the Anza–Borrego Desert, the Rough-winged Such large concentrations during the breeding season may is widespread as a migrant but rare as a breeding spe- be of birds unable to find suitable nest sites—the availabil- cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Swallows As Integrators of Landscape Change in a Multiuse River System: Implications for Aquatic-To-Terrestrial Transfers of Contaminants
    Science of the Total Environment 463-464 (2013) 42–50 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Riparian swallows as integrators of landscape change in a multiuse river system: Implications for aquatic-to-terrestrial transfers of contaminants Jeremy M. Alberts a,⁎,S.Mažeika P. Sullivan b, A. Kautza b a Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 2600 Clifton Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States b School of Environment & Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, United States HIGHLIGHTS • We characterized the land use and land cover (LULC) of 11 riverine study sites. • We examined selenium (Se) and mercury (Hg) concentrations in riparian swallows. • Relationships were evident between LULC and contaminant concentrations. • Contaminant concentrations were higher in adult than in juvenile birds. article info abstract Article history: Recent research has highlighted the transfer of contaminants from aquatic to terrestrial ecosystems via predation of Received 21 January 2013 aquatic emergent insects by riparian consumers. The influence of adjacent land use and land cover (LULC) on Received in revised form 12 May 2013 aquatic-to-terrestrial contaminant transfer, however, has received limited attention. From 2010 to 2012, at 11 Accepted 13 May 2013 river reaches in the Scioto River basin (OH, USA), we investigated the relationships between LULC and selenium Available online xxxx (Se) and mercury (Hg) concentrations in four species of riparian swallows. Hg concentrations in swallows were sig- fi − b Editor: Christian E.W. Steinberg ni cantly higher at rural reaches than at urban reaches (t = 3.58, P 0.001, df = 30), whereas Se concentrations were positively associated with adjacent land cover characterized by mature tree cover (R2 =0.49,P = 0.006).
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Rough-Winged Swallow Stelgidopteryx Serripennis
    Northern Rough-winged Swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis Most breeding Northern Rough-winged Swallows are found The statewide distribution of Northern Rough-winged along streams varying in size from small creeks to the largest Swallows has remained fairly constant during this century. Jones rivers. They normally avoid headwater streams lacking perma- (1903) considered them to be common summer residents nent aquatic habitats and small creeks flowing through heavily throughout Ohio. Hicks (1935) echoed similar sentiments and forested areas, but may occasionally occur along ponds and small recorded breeding pairs within every county, but noted they lakes if suitable nest sites are available. Many pairs construct their became “less frequent” in northern Ohio and rather locally nest burrows into the sides of eroding banks, digging tunnels 0.5– distributed in some western counties. In subsequent decades, their 3 feet long with a nest chamber at the end. However, this species populations have been spreading northward through the Great also regularly occupies drain pipes under bridges. More imagina- Lakes region, although Ohio populations have apparently tive pairs have nested among the pontoons of a boat, the overflow remained fairly stable since 1965 (Robbins, C. S., et al. 1986). pipes of a swimming pool, openings in an oil storage tank (Peterjohn 1989a, Chapman 1938), as well as in sawdust piles, and tree cavities (Peck and James 1987). Rough-wingeds are not totally restricted to riparian corridors. Some pairs regularly nest in the exposed banks of quarries, while others occupy rock crevices within highway cuts. These locations may be several miles from water, and the adult swallows are content to forage over nearby open fields.
    [Show full text]