DOCSLIB.ORG

The Black System Event Compliance Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Black System Event Compliance Report The Black System Event Compliance Report Investigation into the Pre-event, System Restoration, and Market Suspension aspects surrounding the 28 September 2016 event The Black System Event Compliance Report 1 © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 This work is copyright. In addition to any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all material contained within this work is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence, with the exception of: • the Commonwealth Coat of Arms • the ACCC and AER logos • any illustration, diagram, photograph or graphic over which the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission does not hold copyright, but which may be part of or contained within this publication. The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website, as is the full legal code for the CC BY 3.0 AU licence. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Director, Director Content and Digital Services, ACCC, GPO Box 3131, Canberra ACT 2601. Inquiries about this document should be addressed to: Australian Energy Regulator GPO Box 520 Melbourne Vic 3001 Tel: (03) 9290 1444 Fax: (03) 9290 1457 Email: [email protected] ACCC_12/18_1463 The Black System Event Compliance Report 2 Contents Introduction 4 Executive summary 5 Shortened forms 7 Overview 9 1. Overview 10 2. Pre-event (AEMO) compliance 29 Appendix A—Legal framework 67 Appendix B—Summary of weather information available to AEMO 74 Appendix C—Wind farm output during the pre-event period 78 Appendix D—28 September 2016 Heywood Interconnector flows and limits 80 3. Pre-event (ElectraNet) compliance 85 4. System restoration compliance 102 Appendix A—Legal framework 155 5. Market suspension compliance 158 6. Implications for the regulatory framework 190 Glossary 195 The Black System Event Compliance Report 3 Introduction This is the AER’s final report into the Black System Event in South Australia (SA) on 28 September 2016. The AER’s report is a review of compliance by various National Electricity Market (NEM) participants against the applicable National Electricity Rules (the Rules) regarding the operation of the South Australia region of the NEM in the period surrounding the state-wide blackout that occurred on the afternoon of 28 September 2016. This report is divided into the following sections: • Chapter 1—Overview, which provides a high-level overview of the subsequent chapters, including the AER’s role and its investigation, key findings, recommendations and next steps. • Chapter 2—The Pre-event (AEMO), which focussed on AEMO’s actions in the lead up to the storm event, and how it managed power system security under the Rules. • Chapter 3—The Pre-event (ElectraNet), which focussed on ElectraNet’s actions in the lead up to the storm event, and how it met its obligations under the Rules in relation to power system security. • Chapter 4—System Restoration, in which we examined the actions of certain participants in relation to the provision and use of System Restart Ancillary Services to restore the network following the black system conditions of the 28 September 2016. • Chapter 5—Market Suspension, in which we assessed compliance with how participants operated during the 13 day period in which the spot market in South Australia was suspended, including how AEMO managed power system security. • Chapter 6—Implications for the Regulatory Framework, which identifies areas for potential change to improve the overall effectiveness of the regulatory framework. The AER’s work surrounding the actual Event is ongoing and is therefore not a focus of this report. References to times in this report are in “market time” (Australian Eastern Standard Time). The Black System Event Compliance Report 4 Executive summary This report is a review of compliance by various NEM relate to AEMO not meeting all of the process requirements participants against the applicable National Electricity Rules set out in the Rules for reclassification and notifications (the Rules) regarding the operation of the SA region of the to participants. These stem from deficiencies in AEMO NEM in the period surrounding the state-wide blackout that procedures and guidelines. occurred on the afternoon of 28 September 2016. In this Given the nature of the findings, the circumstances under report we deal with the Pre-event period, System Restoration which the non-compliances occurred, and the actions that and Market Suspension. Our work concerning the actual have been taken by AEMO and others since September Event is ongoing. 2016 to address some of the issues identified we do not The state-wide blackout on 28 September 2016 resulted intend to take formal enforcement action in respect of from unprecedented circumstances. It was triggered by these matters. severe weather that damaged transmission and distribution Rather, we consider that the National Electricity Objective assets, which was followed by reduced wind farm output (NEO)—to promote efficient investment in and efficient and a loss of synchronism that caused the loss of the operation and use of energy services for the long term Heywood Interconnector. The subsequent imbalance in interests of consumers with respect to price, quality, supply and demand resulted in the remaining electricity safety, reliability and security of supply of energy—is best generation in SA shutting down. Most supplies were restored served through: in 8 hours, however the wholesale market in SA was suspended for 13 days. • the implementation of recommendations for improved processes. This blackout, known as a ‘Black System Event’, affected • the AER submitting rule change proposals and conducting the entire state-wide network and is the most significant compliance reviews, and market event since the establishment of the NEM 20 years ago. Market suspension has only occurred once before, • reviewing the market framework to enable it to better in April 2001 for two hours; this time the market was accommodate the rapid changes in technologies suspended for 13 days. currently being experienced, and changing the Rules where required. As such, the scope of the AER’s investigation has also been unprecedented. The AER undertakes its compliance role not only for the NEO, but to ensure confidence in the market and that With the investigation not limited to particular parties participants have clarity about their roles and responsibilities. or regulatory obligations, we have assessed all relevant compliance obligations as they relate to market participants, Drawing from our findings, the importance of AEMO Network Service Providers and AEMO. complying with obligations around communication and transparency is growing given the introduction of new types We have found some areas where AEMO did not comply of participants and increasing numbers of participants. with administrative requirements during the pre-event period, but do not consider that these contributed to the sequence Actions proposed by the AER include: of events leading to the state going black. We also found • implementing more rigorous weather further non-compliance around administrative requirements monitoring processes during the market suspension period. Common elements • standardising notifications for market participants during of AEMO’s non-compliance in both of these periods abnormal weather conditions relate to inadequate communication and transparency • more broadly reviewing the criteria under which risks to with stakeholders. the power system are classified We have identified some similar issues with administrative • improving AEMO operator training, and processes in our consideration of the system restoration • clarifying roles and responsibilities of the market operator period. While we have not found any breaches of the Rules and network providers regarding system restoration. in relation to this period, we have made recommendations for future action, including in regard to strengthening joint communication protocols. We have not found that AEMO breached any of its core obligations around operating the market or managing power system security. Rather, the areas of compliance concern The Black System Event Compliance Report 5 Our goal in identifying future improvements is to ensure there is better management by all relevant parties including with regard to transparency and clear communications should similar circumstances arise again in the future. We recognise that some steps have already been taken, or are underway. The AER will be working closely with the AEMC, not only in regard to proposed rule changes, but also in relation to the broader framework issues that have arisen where it is clear that the AER and AEMO have very different interpretations of the Rules. The AER will also be undertaking follow-up monitoring and compliance reviews in relation to the key issues we found, particularly around communication and transparency, not only concerning AEMO’s conduct, but also that of all relevant Registered Participants. The Black System Event Compliance Report 6 Shortened forms Shortened form Extended form AEMC Australian Energy Market Commission AEMO Australian Energy Market Operator AEMO Final Report AEMO’s final report into the Black System Event in South Australia on 28 September 2016 published in March 2017 AER Australian Energy Regulator AEST Australian Eastern Standard Time AWEFS Australian Wind Energy Forecasting System BOM Bureau of Meteorology DI Dispatch Interval DNSP Distribution Network Service Provider DVAR Dynamic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 29 No. 3 Winter 2016 (Pdf)
    NATIONAL RESPONSE Official Journal of the Australian Institute of Emergency Services VOLUME 29 NO. 3 WINTER 2016 PRINT POST PUBLICATION NO. PP100018976 PINERY DESTRUCTION COMPENSATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMPENSATIONSPECIALISTS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Concerned about your SPECIALISTSentitlements to compensation, disability Concerned aboutpayment your entitlements or superannuation? to compensation, disability Our team is professional,payment or experienced superannuation? and compassionate. Our team is professional, experienced and compassionate. Why not call us today? YourWhy first not consultation call us today? is free. Your first consultation is free. 1800 25 1800 stacksgoudkamp.com.au1800 25 1800 stacksgoudkamp.com.au Sydney, Liverpool, Newcastle Sydney, Liverpool, Newcastle NATIONAL Official Publication of AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES Print Post Approved EMERGENCY PP 337586/00067 RESPONSE DISCLAIMER Official Journal of the Australian Institute of Emergency Services Views expressed in this journal, unless specifically acknowledged, are not necessarily those of the Publisher, of the Institute, of its Council or of the Editor. Winter 2016 • National Emergency Response EDITORIAL RIGHTS The Editor of National Emergency Response reserves the right to grant permission to reproduce articles from this journal. Such Approval is hereby granted, unless a specific withdrawal of this permission is included in the article in question. CONTENTS The Author and the journal must be acknowledged in any such reprint. REGULAR COLUMNS MAILING AMENDMENTS OR ENQUIRIES For any amendments or enquiries regarding mailing, please email: 2 President’s Report [email protected] 3 New Members NOTICE TO ADVERTISERS This publication is the official journal of the Australian Institute of 26 Membership information Emergency Services. It is published by Countrywide Austral for the Australian Institute of Emergency Services and will be distributed 27 AIES Contacts to its members.
    [Show full text]
  • CFS Volunteer Yearbook 2017
    the VOLUNTEER YEARBOOK 2017 CFS volunteers give their all for others. When something happens to them, it’s our turn to give CFS Foundation – always there in a time of great need Although he claims he “just did what anyone would do”, young CFS volunteer Brad Dennis stands out for his bravery in facing great risks to help others who are in danger. More than a year after the devastating Pinery fire, its effects are still evident in the lives of many individuals and communities. Brad’s story of great courage and resilience reminds us of this. His story also demonstrates the clear need for the work of the CFS Foundation. Bushfires are a constant in South Australia, and we are well served by the selfless volunteers of the SACFS. However their service can at times come at great cost and they deserve our support in times of need. Brad, from Baroota and a member of the Port Germein brigade, suffered life threatening injuries in the Pinery fire. Family and friends have supported Brad at every step of his recovery. The CFS Foundation is proud to have contributed to the support offered to Brad as he undertakes his rehabilitation. Assisting volunteers in need, who have risked their lives for others, Brad Dennis is the core of the Foundation’s work. Please help – you can make a real difference Country Fire Service It’s inevitable that nature will again show us its almighty force in the future. CFS volunteers are always at the ready – 24/7, 365 days each year, placing their lives in danger Foundation to protect our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Barossa and Light Regional Road Assessment
    Barossa and Light Regional Road Assessment October 2017 RAA – Regional Road Assessment – Barossa and Light Prepared By Matthew Vertudaches Date 6 November 2017 Traffic Engineer T 08 8202 4703 E [email protected] Barb Cowey Policy & Research Manager T 08 8202 4414 E [email protected] Approved By Charles Mountain Date 6 November 2017 Senior Manager Road Safety T 08 8202 4568 E [email protected] Revision History Revision Date Author Approver Comment V1.3 9/10/17 MV CM Draft for comment V1.4 17/10/17 MV CM Edits V1.5 6/11/17 MV CM Minor Edits/Formatting Changes i RAA – Regional Road Assessment – Barossa and Light Executive Summary RAA’s Road Safety team periodically evaluates the South Australian regional road network. This assessment of the Barossa Tourism region summarises both the Light Regional Council and the Barossa Council districts. RAA consulted the community through a stakeholder consultation session and a survey of Members living in the Barossa and Light Regional council districts to determine a number of areas of concern prior to undertaking four days of site investigations and covering a distance of over 1000 kilometres. The traffic investigations took place between the first and fourth of August in 2017. From the Member survey some key transport issues were identified including: Rail network and lack of train services into the Barossa and Light regions Speed limits on unsealed roads Poor road maintenance Troublesome freight interactions Tourists lack of understanding about the road network Access to the unsealed road network during periods of wet weather Confusion relating to many different speed limit zones in the region Inadequate cycling facilities Inadequate alternative transport options As a result of our investigations, RAA have identified some key improvements including: Consistent use of ’60 ahead’ signage on the approach to these speed zones and consistent use of speed limits through towns and on major roads in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Inquiries and Reports Concerning Natural Disasters
    Background Paper: Australian inquiries and reports concerning natural disasters The Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements was established on 20 February 2020 in response to the extreme bushfire season of 2019-20 which resulted in devastating loss of life, property and wildlife, and environmental destruction across the nation. The Letters Patent for the Royal Commission set out the terms of reference and formally appoint Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin AC (Retd), the Honourable Dr Annabelle Bennett AC SC and Professor Andrew Macintosh as Royal Commissioners. This paper was published on 15 May 2020. © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 ISBN: 978-1-921091-09-4 (online only) With the exception of the Coat of Arms and where otherwise stated, all material presented in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. For the avoidance of doubt, this means this licence only applies to material as set out in this document. The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website as is the full legal code for the CC BY 4.0 licence <www.creativecommons.org/licenses> The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are detailed on the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet website. Page 2 of 23 Contents Background Paper: Australian inquiries and reports concerning natural disasters ......................................... 1 Inquiries into the 2019-2020 bushfire season ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Twin Creek Wind Farm Bushfire Management Plan
    Twin Creek Wind Farm Bushfire Management Plan June 2017 1 Disclaimer Twin Creek Wind Farm Bushfire Management Plan has been produced by SA Bushfire Solutions. Although every attempt has been made to ensure the contents of this assessment are as accurate as possible, it must be acknowledged that over time, changes in environmental conditions and government policy may affect the recommendations provided in this plan. It should be noted that although reasonable steps have been taken to minimise this, SA Bushfire Solutions accepts no responsibility for any damages that may result from the implementation of recommendations from this assessment. For clarification or further information, I invite you to contact: Brett Stephens Director SA Bushfire Solutions 0427 604 253 [email protected] www.sabushfiresolutions.com 2 Executive Summary The plan focuses specifically to the construction and operation of the proposed Twin Creek Wind Farm, northern Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia and defines objectives and recommendations to mitigate the threat that bushfires pose to life, property, the environment and the potential hindrance to suppression operations. The plan makes recommendations that may support and guide management decisions to mitigate potential bushfire risks. The evaluation of bushfire risk is extremely complex due to the range of factors that may influence potential outcomes. It is not feasible to undertake a risk assessment for every possible scenario when so many variables can affect the possible likelihood and consequence. Bushfire suppression is also a complex activity that requires involvement from a wide range of stakeholders and it is important to note that no single approach, strategy or technique is instrumental in the mitigation of risk or successful suppression operations at bushfires.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Initiate and Amendment to the Planning & Design Code
    PROPOSAL TO INITIATE AND AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNING & DESIGN CODE State-wide Bushfire Hazards Overlay Code Amendment By the State Planning Commission _____________ (Signature Required) CHAIR, STATE PLANNING COMMISSION Date: L\ · d- .. ~ , This Proposal to Initiate document forms the basis for the preparation of a proposed amendment to the Planning and Design Code for the purpose of section 73(2)(a) of the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016. 1. INTRODUCTION ... ..... ...................... ........................... .. ......................... ................. ...... .. .............. ..... ... .. ....... ... ... 3 1.1. Designated Entity for Undertaking the Code Amendment ..... .. .... ...................... ... ..... ..................... .... ....... 3 1.2. Rationale for the Code Amendment .. ............................. ................................................................................. .. .. 3 2. SCOPE OF THE CODE AMENDMENT ........ ... ....................... .. .............. ... .. .. ...... .. ............................................ 6 2.1. Affected Area .... .................................... ............. .................................. ............ .... ..... ... .. .............. ..... .. ............. 6 2.2. Scope of Proposed Code Amendment .................. .. .................... ..... ..................................................... ....... 6 3. STRATEGIC ALIGNM ENT ................. ......... .......... ......................... ...... ....................... ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia's 2019-20 Bushfire Season
    Independent Review South into Australia's 2019-20 Bushfire Season Bushfire Independent Review into South Australia's 2019-20 Bushfi re Season Abbreviations ADF Australian Defence Force IMT Incident Management Team Australasian Fire and Emergency Service IT Information Technology AFAC Authorities Council MFS South Australian Metropolitan Fire Service Australasian Inter-Service Incident AIIMS MFSG Mapping Functional Support Group Management System National Emergency Risk Assessment AVL Automatic Vehicle Location NERAG Guidelines (NERAG) BBCA Bushfi re Building Council of Australia NRSC National Resource Sharing Centre BMAP Bushfi re Management Area Plan NSWRFS NSW Rural Fire Service Bushfi re and Natural Hazards Cooperative BNHCRC NVC Native Vegetation Council Research Centre PIRSA Primary Industries and Regions SA BOPS Burnover Protection Systems PPE Personal Protective Equipment Bushfi re Royal Royal Commission into National Commission Disaster Arrangements Prevention; Preparedness; Response PPRR and Recovery CAD Computer Aided Dispatch PRZ Primary Response Zone CEO Chief Executive Offi cer RAFT Remote Area Firefi ghting Teams CFS South Australian Country Fire Service SAAS South Australian Ambulance Service The Review acknowledges traditional owners in South Australia and pays respects to DEW Department for Environment and Water Elders past and present and extends that respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander South Australian Fire and Emergency Department of Planning Transport SAFECOM DPTI Services Commission people throughout the
    [Show full text]
  • South Para Collaborative Fire Management Plan
    For further information please contact: Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources office. This Fire Management Plan is also available from: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/firemanagement Front Cover Main image: South Para Reservoir © Ian Tanner Inset Images: Stiff White Spider-orchid (Caladenia rigida) © Joe Quarmby, Barossa Reservoir © SA Water, Pine Plantation © ForestrySA Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, ForestrySA, SA Waters, and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and its employees expressly di sclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. Permissive Licence This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reference to any company, product or service in this publication should not be taken as a Departmental endorsement of the company, product or service. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources 2016 ISBN 978-1-921800-80-1
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts 13–15 April 2016 Contents
    Abstracts 13–15 April 2016 Contents Abstracts . Watsonia control: Effectiveness of 2,2-DPA, impacts on native flora and influence of a prescribed-burn . 16 Burnt Trees: Habitat or Hazardous? . 16 Using Prescribed Burns to Achieve Weed Management Objectives . 16 Habitat suitability mapping and fire management – towards improved conservation outcomes for the Endangered Mount Lofty Ranges Chestnut-rumped Heathwren and associated heath species . 17 Integrated Remote Sensing and GIS in Linear Features Mapping For Water Resources Study in Central Flinders Ranges, South Australia . 17 Seasonal variation in the nature of DOM in a river and drinking water reservoir of a closed catchment in South Australia . 18 Developing hydrological restoration options for Glenshera Swamp, Stipiturus Conservation Park . 20 Groundwater management and mining development in South Australia . 20 Algal Advocacy . 20 Does release method matter when reintroducing brushtail possums to the semi-arid zone? . 21 A Heritage of Innovation: biocultural narratives in the McLaren Vale, South Australia . 22 Bushfires, biodiversity and peri-urban planning in a second modernity: the example of the Mt Lofty Ranges . 22 Climate change adaptation in the Alinytjara Wilurara region of South Australia . 23 How best do we sample a region’s vascular plant diversity and how representative of a region is the State Herbarium collection? . 23 Tales from the type bay of the State Herbarium of South Australia . 24 Should I stay or should I go: The movement of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) around the Great Australian Bight Marine Park inferred from satellite telemetry . 24 Overcoming constraints on sandy soils – amelioration strategies to improve resource condition and boost crop production .
    [Show full text]