DOCSLIB.ORG

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Clinical Microbiology Laboratory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Clinical Microbiology 2: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests • Basic principle • Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests (AST) Nuntra Suwantarat, MD, D(ABMM) - Phenotypic test °µµ¦¥r¡¥r®· ´¦µ ­»ª´µ¦´r - Genotypic test Chulabhorn International College of Medicine • Clinical correlation and clinical application Division of Infectious Diseases • Summary Thammasat University Hospital Thammasat University 13 March 2018 • I have no conflict interest to be disclosure IDAT Week 2018 Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests • Identification (ID) • Standardized, reproducible methods for assessing Causative pathogens antibiotic activity • Routine tests (manual and automated methods) • Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST)* Phenotypic >>>> Genotypic Phenotypic vs Genotypic • Guideline for performing the tests and breakpoints interpretation (CLSI/ EUCAST) • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) • Specialized tests for specific applications Chromosomal vs plasmid resistance ESBL, CRE confirmation tests Intrinsic vs acquired resistance Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus (mecAtest) Basic and conventional biochemical methods Advance and molecular identification methods Inducible clindamycin resistance (D test) Kirby-Bauer Method 1. Disk Diffusion Antibiotic susceptibility testing in which disks containing various antibiotics are placed on a plate swabbed with the organism. Zones of inhibition are measured to determine whether the organism is susceptible, intermediate or resistant. (Based on interpretation guideline, CLSI, EUCAST) Manual of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, JHU microbiology laboratory ASM, 2005 Disk Diffusion Test Disk Diffusion Test Manual of antimicrobial Manual of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, susceptibility testing, ASM, 2005 ASM, 2005 Disk Diffusion Test Disk Diffusion Test GOOD TO rule-out mix infection (not pure colonies) Manual of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Manual of antimicrobial ASM, 2005 susceptibility testing, ASM, 2005 Disk Diffusion Test Disk Diffusion Test Manual of antimicrobial Manual of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, susceptibility testing, ASM, 2005 ASM, 2005 Disk Diffusion Test 2. Tube Dilution Method The first tube in which there is no visible growth is the MIC level Variable factors of the antibiotic for the organism tested. • Media composition • Media pH • Agar depth • Concentration of inoculum • Inoculation procedure • Antimicrobial concentration in disk • Disk storage MIC Antibiotic Concentration Low --------------------------------------------------High JHU microbiology laboratory Illustration of the difference between MIC test MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration, and MBC, minimum bactericidal concentration, of an antibiotic. MBC MIC *MIC= 1st tube with no visible growth Routinely use, CLSI and EUCAST Interpretation Use for guiding treatment* Endocarditis (Enterococcus, S. bovis) meningitis (S. pneumoniae) MDR bacteria; MBC = 99% bacterial growth inhibition MRSA (vancomycin MIC) (Currently use only for research, ESBL/CRE previously use for endocarditis treatment) Broth microdilution: manual or commercial system ie MicroScan, TREK panels Phoenix system, VITEK2 system --- Give MIC interpretation MIC Test MIC test Æ MIC 4. E-test Method 3. Agar Dilution Method Each strip is impregnated with increasing concentrations of a different antibiotic ; Formerly used at JHH, this method measures MICs of antibiotics by comparing strips are placed on a plate swabbed with the organism to be tested, and incubated growth of colonies on plates of increasing antibiotic concentrations. overnight. The MIC level for each antibiotic is at the line crossed on the strip where Labor intensive/ rarely use in routine labs the organism is inhibited from growing. For research: Standard for Anaerobic bacteria AST, N. gonorrhea AST Note E-test/ Gradient concentration may have variable of diffusion E= elliptical shape as disk diffusion JHU microbiology laboratory JHU microbiology laboratory New Jan 2018 (CLSI: M100S28) Automated biochemical identification and susceptibility method What do you need from AST? MicroScan system (Walkaway system) VITEK 2 system • Accurate results BD Phoenix system (QA/QC, interpretation Æ identification) Sensititer • Short/ Appropriate TAT • Clinical applicable • Clinical impact for patient care • Cost effectiveness MicroScan Identification and AST cards (pH changes) Routine ID method at TUH since September 2015 Nonfermenters Æ Elizabethkingae, Ekinella, Chryseobacterium, Salphingomonas, Roseomonas, Methylobacterium etc Beta-hemolytic streptococci Æ GAS: S. pyogenes, GBS: S. agalactiae, Group D strep Æ S. gallolyticus, Enterococcus spp. Calculated MIC (TAT 6-8 hrs) Pro: Faster for common bacteria, size of machine Con: Indeterminate for special pathogens (not good for yeast), need to refrigerate ID/AST cards Fluorescent detection + Semi-calculated MIC (TAT 6-8hrs) Pro: Faster(common bacteria), confirmation tests (CPE?), accurate MIC Con: Indeterminate for special bacteria size of machine (better with M50)/ package? Mechanism of GN resistance Phenotypic resistance - Enzymatic resistance vs Non-enzymatic resistance Pro - Acquired (plasmid/transferable resistance Genotypic resistance Good for Intrinsic (chromosomal) resistance Yeast Enzymatic (Candida AST) (hydrolytic enz) OprD = “+” betalactamase (several bla genes) MTB/NTM OprE/F = “no charge” Non-enzymatic Enterobactericae Æ Plasmid transfer (mainly) Colistin AST? -Efflux pump Æ need isolation -Porin change - Nonfermenters Æ non-plasmid transfer (oprD gene) (mainly) Æ +/- isolation Con -Decreased Not automated membrane permeability (omp gene) system -Aminoglycoside (aac gene) (target site changed) -Quinolone resistance (gyrA, gyrB, parC, qnr genes) AAC 1999;43(2):424-7 NEJM 2008;358:1271-81 CRE vs CPE (CP-CRE) CRE vs CPE (CP-CRE) Carbapenem resistant Enterobactericeae • Definition • CRE = Carbapenem Resistance Enterobacteriaceae CDC 2015 definition Resistance to imipenem, meropenem, doripenem or ertapenem KPC OXA KPC VIM OR documentation that the isolate produce carbapenemase NDM-1 MCR-1 NDM-1 • CP-CRE = Carbapenem-Producing Enterobacteriaceae CRE/CP-CRE in Thailand Æ plasmid transferable gene (carbapenemase) = NDM-1, OXA ÆÆInfection control implementation needed KPC CDC; Healthcare associate infection Variable in geographic distribution (Genotypic resistance) CRE confirmation test No need to perform if use new CLSI breakpoints (2010) JCM, Sep 2013 The CIM (Carbapenemase inactivation method) PCR Results (Manual in house test) a new phenotypic Test to assess Carbapenemase activity NDM 561 bp OXA 438 bp IMP 232 bp van der Zwaluw K, de Haan A, Pluister GN, et al. The Carbapenem Inactivation Method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP Test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in Gram-Negative rods. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(3): e0123690. Cepheid GeneXpert CRE stool Screening KPC NDM ASM 2012 Gene target gyrB hsp60 sodA gyrB tuf gene gyrB hsp60 hsp60 gene hsp60 hsp60 Verigene: BC- GP test Limitation (Nanosphere) FDA cleared blood c/s Aerobic bottle multiplex PCR, only microarray: Mixed TAT: 2.5 hrs infection Mixed c/s • Biofire Filmarray Positive Blood panel (Multiplex PCR) (1 h result) Caution! Gram-negative bacteria resistance mechanism = genotypic (enzymatic) and non genotypic (non-enzymatic) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests • Basic principle • Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Phenotypic test Genotypic test • Clinical correlation • Summary MIC vs Disk Diffusion Test MIC vs Disk Diffusion Test Interpretative criteria/guideline: CLSI, EUCAST Patient dose not response with Gentamicin. Why? Treatment guideline: research data, patient care Note: MIC Tobramycin *** *** is lower than Gentamicin (all susceptible) In vitro data Tobramycin is a better choice. New Jan 2018 (CLSI: M100S28) New Jan 2017 (CLSI: M100S27) Caution! No breakpoint for Burkholderia pseudomallei in CLSI (Meliodosis) See CDC recommendation or reference articles Non-Enterobacteriacae (not Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas): No disk diffusion breakpoint Identification Automated system: Burkholderia pseudomallei misidentification is not uncommon. AST: No CLSI interpretative criteria Disk diffusion: overcall TMP-SMX resistance MIC test is recommended. New Jan 2017 (CLSI: M100S27) MRSA: Vancomycin test = MIC only No disk diffusion breakpoint Using CLSI 2010 breakpoint: no need for ESBL/ CRE confirmation test mecA gene VanA Vancomycin MIC creeping (MIC > 1) Æ more treatment failure Æ Vancomycin should not be avoided. NEJM-review, IDSA Guideline for MRSA treatment, Endocarditis treatment MSSA vs MRSA Use: Linezolid/ Daptomycin/ Ceftaroline Definition, Mechanism of resistance, CA-MRSA vs HA-MRSA (USA type, Scc type) Endocarditis, Severe Pneumonia, Severe Skin infection, Osteomyelitis Need to monitor Vancomycin MIC and vancomycin trough level (drug level) Sanford Guideline (Infectious Disease Treatment GL) Viridans strep, S. bovis (S. gallolyticus) endocarditis • Pen G MIC <0.12 mcg/mL = Susceptible Æ Pen G or Ceftriaxone x 4 weeks Æ shorten duration = Pen G or Ceftriaxone PLUS gentamicin x 2 wks • Pen G MIC > 0.12 to < 0.5 = Intermediate resistance Æ Pen G or Ceftriaxone x 4 weeks PLUS gentamicin x 2 weeks Æ Vancomycin x 4 weeks • Pen G MIC > 0.5 = Resistance Æ Pen G (or Ampicillin) PLUS gentamicin x 4-6 weeks Æ Vancomycin PLUS gentamicin x 4-6 weeks D- test: Micro labs report should be…. Other indication for MIC monitoring/use Erythromycin-Resistance *Enterococcus Endocarditis, S. pneumoniae
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Strains Causing Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnancy: a Cross- Sectional Study in Harare, Zimbabwe
    MOJ Immunology Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Strains causing Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnancy: A Cross- Sectional Study in Harare, Zimbabwe Abstract Research Article Background and objective antibiotic susceptibility pattern: Effective among treatmentisolated bacterial of asymptomatic species among bacteriuria pregnant in Volume 6 Issue 1 - 2018 pregnancy requires susceptible drugs. The aim of this study was to determine womenMaterials with and asymptomatic Methods bacteriuria. : This study was conducted at 4 selected primary health 1Department of Nursing Science, University of Zimbabwe, care facilities in Harare, including pregnant women registering for antenatal Zimbabwe care at gestation between 6 and 22 weeks and without urinary tract infection 2Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zimbabwe, symptoms. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was diagnosed by culture test of all Zimbabwe 3 midstream urine samples following screening by Griess nitrate test. Susceptibility Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe test was done for all positive 24 hour old culture using the disk diffusion test. The resistant and intermediate. 4Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway minimum inhibitory concentration was measured and categorized as susceptible, Results *Corresponding author: : Tested antibiotics included gentamycin (88.2%), ceftriaxone (70.6%), Department of Nursing Science,Judith Mazoe Musona Street, Rukweza, PO Box nitrofurantoin (76.5%), ciprofloxacin (82.4%), ampicillin (67.6%) and norfloxacin University of Zimbabwe, College of Health Sciences, (61.8%). Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was 14.2% (95% CI, 10.28% to 19.22%). Coagulase negative staphylococcus was the most popular (29.4%) A198, Harare, Zimbabwe, Tel: 00263773917910; Email: bacteria followed by Escherichia coli (23.5%). Gentamycin (83.3%), ciprofloxacin Received: | Published: (75%) and ceftriaxone (70.8) overally had the highest sensitivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Integrating Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2019, Article ID 8041746, 6 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8041746 Research Article Integrating Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing: A Simple and Rapid Approach to Reduce the Turnaround Time in the Management of Blood Cultures Dariane C. Pereira1 and Luciano Z. Goldani 2 1Microbiology Unit, Laboratory Diagnosis Service, Hospital de Cl´ınicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil 2InfectiousDiseases Unit, Hospital de Cl´ınicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil Correspondence should be addressed to Luciano Z. Goldani; [email protected] Received 1 June 2019; Revised 15 August 2019; Accepted 16 September 2019; Published 3 October 2019 Academic Editor: Jiangke Yang Copyright © 2019 Dariane C. Pereira and Luciano Z. Goldani. -is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We evaluated a rapid bacterial identification (rID) and a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion (rAST) from positive blood culture to overcome the limitations of the conventional methods and reduce the turnaround time in bloodstream infection diagnostics. -e study included hemocultures flagged as positive by bacT/ALERT , identification by MALDI-TOF MS, and rAST. -e results were compared to identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)® results by current standard methods, after 24 h incubation. For rAST categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor errors (mE) were calculated. A total of 524 bacterial samples isolated from blood cultures were obtained, including 246 Gram-negative (GN) and 278 Gram-positive (GP) aerobes.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asian and European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance
    Central Asian and European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance CAESAR Manual Version 3.0 2019 Central Asian and European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance CAESAR Manual Version 3, 2019 Abstract This manual is an update of the first edition published in 2015 and describes the objectives, methods and organization of the Central Asian and European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (CAESAR) network. It details steps involved for a country or area wanting to enrol in CAESAR, as well as steps involved in routine data collection for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. It contains the protocols and AMR case definitions used by the network. Key updates involve the addition of Salmonella species to the list of pathogens under surveillance, as well as updates related to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing categories. CAESAR continues to coordinate closely with the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) and strives for compatibility and comparability with EARS-NET, as well as the Global AMR Surveillance System coordinated by WHO headquarters. Keywords DRUG RESISTANCE, MICROBIAL ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS INFECTION CONTROL POPULATION SURVEILLANCE DATA COLLECTION Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2019 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    [Show full text]
  • (IQC) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Using Disk Diffusion
    Internal Quality Control (IQC) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Using Disk Diffusion National AMR Surveillance Network, NCDC National Programme on Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance National Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi April 2019 CONTENTS I. Scope .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Selection of Strains for Quality Control ..................................................................................................... 2 III. Maintenance and Testing of QC Strains..................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1: Flow Chart: Maintenance of QC strains in a bacteriology lab......................................................... 4 IV. Quality Control (QC) Results—Documentation - Zone Diameter ............................................................. 5 V. QC Conversion Plan ................................................................................................................................... 5 1. The 20- or 30-Day Plan .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. The 15-Replicate (3× 5 Day) Plan ......................................................................................................... 5 3. Implementing Weekly Quality Control Testing ..................................................................................... 6 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ketoconazole Susceptibility Test for Malassezia Pachydermatis Using Modified Leeming–Notman Agar
    Journal of Fungi Article A Ketoconazole Susceptibility Test for Malassezia pachydermatis Using Modified Leeming–Notman Agar Bo-Young Hsieh 1,2, Wei-Hsun Chao 3, Yi-Jing Xue 2 and Jyh-Mirn Lai 2,* 1 Lugu Township Administration, Nanto County 55844, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chiayi University, No. 580, XinMin Rd., Chiayi City 60054, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of Hospitality Management, WuFung University, Chiayi City 60054, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-5-2732920; Fax: +886-5-2732917 Received: 18 September 2018; Accepted: 14 November 2018; Published: 16 November 2018 Abstract: The aim of this study was to establish a ketoconazole susceptibility test for Malassezia pachydermatis using modified Leeming–Notman agar (mLNA). The susceptibilities of 33 M. pachydermatis isolates obtained by modified CLSI M27-A3 method were compared with the results by disk diffusion method, which used different concentrations of ketoconazole on 6 mm diameter paper disks. Results showed that 93.9% (31/33) of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained from both methods were similar (consistent with two methods within 2 dilutions). M. pachydermatis BCRC 21676 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used to verify the results obtained from the disk diffusion and modified CLSI M27-A3 tests, and they were found to be consistent. Therefore, the current study concludes that this new novel test—using different concentrations of reagents on cartridge disks to detect MIC values against ketoconazole—can be a cost-effective, time-efficient, and less technically demanding alternative to existing methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Positive
    Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS and a modification of the standardised disc diffusion test: a pilot study. Item Type Article Authors Fitzgerald, C;Stapleton, P;Phelan, E;Mulhare, P;Carey, B;Hickey, M;Lynch, B;Doyle, M Citation Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS and a modification of the standardised disc diffusion test: a pilot study. 2016 J. Clin. Pathol. DOI 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203436 Publisher BMJ Journal Journal of clinical pathology Rights Archived with thanks to Journal of clinical pathology Download date 26/09/2021 22:03:45 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10147/620889 Find this and similar works at - http://www.lenus.ie/hse Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing of Positive Blood Cultures using MALDI-TOF MS and a modification of the standardized disk diffusion test - a pilot study. Fitzgerald C1, Stapleton P1, Phelan E1 , Mulhare P1, Carey B1, Hickey M1, Lynch B1, Doyle M1. 1Microbiology Laboratory, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore road, Waterford, Ireland Corresponding author: [email protected] Telephone: 00353-51-842488 Fax: 00353-51-848566 1 Keywords: blood culture, MALDI-TOF MS, rapid identification, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing, disk diffusion, clinical impact Word count: 3,000 Abstract Aims In an era when clinical microbiology laboratories are under increasing financial pressure, there is a need for inexpensive, yet effective, rapid microbiology tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel modification of standard methodology for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of pathogens in positive blood cultures, reducing the turnaround time of laboratory results by 24 hours Methods 277 positive blood cultures had a gram stain performed, were o subcultured and incubated at 37 C in a CO2 atmosphere for 4 to 6 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • 1815-IJBCS-Article-Sylvester Okorondu
    Available online at http://ajol.info/index.php/ijbcs Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 7(4): 1668-1677, August 2013 ISSN 1991-8631 Original Paper http://indexmedicus.afro.who.int Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity profile of urinary tract infection pathogens among pregnant and non pregnant women S. I. OKORONDU 1* , C. O. AKUJOBI 1, C. B. NNADI 1, S. O. ANYADO-NWADIKE 2 et M. M. O. OKORONDU 3 1Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology Owerri, P.M.B. 1526, Owerri, Nigeria. 2Department of Biotechnology, Federal University of Technology Owerri, P.M.B. 1526, Owerri, Nigeria. 3Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Technology Owerri, P.M.B. 1526, Owerri, Nigeria. * Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity profile of urinary tract infection isolates from 100 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in Owerri General Hospital, Nigeria was assessed. The prevalence of UTI isolates from the pregnant women was compared with that in non-pregnant women. The organisms isolated include: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus , Coagulase negative Staphylococcus, Klebsiella spp , Pseudomonas spp, Proteus spp and Streptococcus spp. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolates were also determined using disk diffusion test. One hundred (100) women were tested; 40% had bacteriuria as against 31% in non-pregnant women. The most sensitive isolate was E. coli, while the least was Streptococcus spp. The most effective antibiotics were Gentamycin, Tarivid and Ciprofloxacin, while the least occurred with Chloramphenicol, Ampicillin, Septrin, Ampiclox. Improvement on personal hygiene and diagnostic screening and treatment will help to reduce the prevalence of bacteriuria in pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Susceptibility Testing in Veterinary Medicine
    Use of Susceptibility Testing in Veterinary Medicine Peter D. Constable, BVSc, MS, PhD, DACVIM Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61 802 Abstract three categories, susceptible (sensitive), intermediate and resistant, using recommendations from the National There has been increased interest in optimizing Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) treatment protocols for antimicrobial agents, with sub­ for testing Veterinary Pathogens.4 The intermediate stantial reliance on susceptibility testing of bacterial term indicates an MIC value that is close to the pathogens isolated from diseased cattle. Antimicrobial breakpoint.5 susceptibility testing of bovine bacterial pathogens has The broth dilution method provides a direct mea­ traditionally used the agar diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) surement of MIC, and determines the ability of the method, which was designed to reflect the antibiotic pathogen to grow in the presence of a known antibiotic concentration in serum and interstitial fluid of human concentration. The broth dilution test is usually per­ patients. The validity of agar diffusion susceptibility formed as a commercially available microdilution test breakpoints derived from humans to the treatment of (Sensititre, Westlake, OH) in a 96 well microtiter plate mastitis, diarrhea and respiratory disease in cattle has that permits the testing of 12 antibiotics in a range of not been established. The use of susceptibility testing eight 2-fold dilutions.5 The microdilution method starts to guide treatment decisions for individual cattle is not by using a sterile loop to remove 3-5 representative colo­ recommended until the breakpoints have been validated nies from a 24-hour bacterial culture plate (use of mul­ as being predictive of treatment outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Workshop
    Educational Workshop EW08: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing – practical implementation of the EUCAST breakpoints and methods arranged with the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ()(EUCAST) Convenors: Gunnar Kahlmeter (Växjö,,) SE) Derek Brown (Peterborough, UK) Faculty: Gunnar Kahlmeter (Växjö, SE) Derek Brown (Peterborough, UK) Rafael Canton (Madrid, ES) Fred Tenover (Sunnyvale, US) Roland Leclercq (Caen, FR) Kahlmeter - EUCAST Clinical Breakpoints EUCAST Clinical Breakpoints Gunnar Kahlmeter ECCMID 2010 Q 1 Tasks 1. Determine clinical breakpoints for existing and new antibacterials, antifungals, antimycobacterials. 2. Define wild type MIC distributions and epidemiological cut-off values for bacteria and fungi. 3. Develop susceptibility testing methods and systems for internal QC. 4. Liaise with EMEA, ECDC, EFSA, EARSS and others involved in antimicrobial resistance. 5. Liaise with national committees involved in antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility testing, to facilitate implementation of European breakpoints 3 Kahlmeter - EUCAST Clinical Breakpoints Q 2 Why European breakpoints in Europe? EUCAST breakpoints … • based on EMEA approved indications and outcome evaluation, Pk/Pd, multiple MIC distributions, and modern principles of determining breakpoints • related to European minimum and maximum dosages • accepted by European regulatregulatoryory authorities (EMEA, ECDC) • official breakpoints in European SPCs (EMEA) • ”case definitions” for antimicrobial resistance surveillance (ECDC) • transparant and
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Disk Diffusion Test During Bacteremia: Evaluation of Antibiotic Susceptibility Results †
    Conference Proceedings Paper Direct disk diffusion test during bacteremia: evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility results † Samar Akbi 1,2, *, Nassim Ahmed 1,2, Nadjet Aggoune 1,2, Ali Zerouki1,2 1 Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers 1, 16028, Algiers, Algeria 2 Microbiology Department, Central Hospital of the Army, 16331, Algiers, Algeria * Correspondence: [email protected] † Presented at: The first International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics, 08-17 May 2021, Online Received: date; Accepted: date; Published: date Abstract: Bacteremia are life threatening emergencies. Early initiation of adequate antibiotic therapy reduces mortality. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the results obtained with the direct AST, carried out directly from positive blood cultures on Mueller-Hinton CHROMagar medium. To do this, 124 strains were tested against 21 antibiotics. The resulting diameters were read after 8h and 18h of incubation, interpreted using the CLSI breakpoints and compared to those obtained with the standard method. The results were extremely satisfactory at 18h (94.43% CA). Non-fermenting GNB recorded the best results with 98.74%CA at 18h. These encouraging results suggest a possible future implementation of the direct-from-blood culture AST as a routine technique. Keywords: Antibiotic, Bacteremia, Blood culture, Direct AST, Disk diffusion technique 1. Introduction Bacteremia still constitute a major public health problem. [1-3]. These are absolute emergencies with mortality increasing by 7.6% for every hour spent before the introduction of an adequate antibiotic treatment [4]. However, in almost 40% of cases, the probabilistic antibiotic therapy received is inadequate [5]; hence the interest of its rapid re-evaluation in targeted antibiotic therapy based on the results reported by the microbiology laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Helicobacter Pylori Isolates from Brazilian Children and Adolescents: Comparing Agar Dilution, E-Test, and Disk Diffusion
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositório Institucional UNIFESP Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 45, 4, 1439-1448 (2014) Copyright © 2014, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia ISSN 1678-4405 www.sbmicrobiologia.org.br Research Paper Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori isolates from Brazilian children and adolescents: Comparing agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion Silvio Kazuo Ogata1, Ana Cristina Gales2, Elisabete Kawakami1 1Disciplina de Gastroenterologia Pediátrica, Hepatologica e Nutrição, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2Laboratório Especial de Microbiologia Clínica, Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Submitted: October 22, 2013; Approved: April 17, 2014. Abstract Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori is increasingly important due to resis- tance to the most used antimicrobials agents. Only agar dilution method is approved by CLSI, but it is difficult to perform routinely. We evaluated the reliability of E-test and disk diffusion comparing to agar dilution method on Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Susceptibility test- ing was performed for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, furazolidone, metronidazole and tetracycline us- ing E-test, disk-diffusion and agar dilution method in 77 consecutive Helicobacter pylori strains from dyspeptic children and adolescents. Resistance rates were: amoxicillin - 10.4%, 9% and 68.8%; clarithromycin - 19.5%, 20.8%, 36.3%; metronidazole - 40.2%33.7%, 38.9%, respectively by agar dilution, E-test and disk diffusion method. Furazolidone and tetracycline showed no resistance rates. Metronidazole presented strong correlation to E-test (r = 0.7992, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.6962, p < 0.0001).
    [Show full text]
  • Genotypic Vs Phenotypic
    Clinical Microbiology and Infection 24 (2018) 935e943 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinical Microbiology and Infection journal homepage: www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com Narrative review Rapid phenotypic methods to improve the diagnosis of bacterial bloodstream infections: meeting the challenge to reduce the time to result * G. Dubourg 1, , B. Lamy 2, 3, 4, R. Ruimy 2, 3, 4 1) Aix Marseille Universite, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, IHU Mediterranee Infection, Marseille, France 2) Laboratoire de Bacteriologie, Hopital^ L'archet 2, CHU de Nice, Nice, France 3) INSERM U1065, Centre Mediterraneen de Medecine Moleculaire, Equipe 6, Nice, France 4) FacultedeMedecine, UniversiteCote^ d’Azur, Nice, France article info abstract Article history: Background: Administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is one of the key factors in surviving Received 29 December 2017 bloodstream infections. Blood culture is currently the reference standard for diagnosis, but conventional Received in revised form practices have long turnaround times while diagnosis needs to be faster to improve patient care. 17 March 2018 Phenotypic methods offer an advantage over genotypic methods in that they can identify a wide range of Accepted 20 March 2018 taxa, detect the resistance currently expressed, and resist genetic variability in resistance detection. Available online 29 March 2018 Aims: We aimed to discuss the wide array of phenotypic methods that have recently been developed to Editor: L. Leibovici substantially reduce the time to result from identification
    [Show full text]