Download Income of Families and Persons in the United States: 1962

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Income of Families and Persons in the United States: 1962 Series P-60, No. 41 October 21, 1963 INCOME OF FAMILIES AND PERSONS IN THE UNITED STATES: 1962 (Advance data on the 1962 income of .families and persons were issued in June 1963 in Current ~ophationReports, Series P-60, No. 40) For the country as a whole, 'the average and amounted to 16 million families, or jy per- (median) income of families in 1962 was about cent, of all families. In the intermediate $6,000, according to estimates released today ranges, about 9 million families, or19 percent, by the Bureau of the Census, Department of received incomes betbeen $3,000 and $5,000; and Commerce. This average was about $220, or 103 million, or 22 percent, had incomes between 4 percent, higher than in 1961, reflecting the $5,000 and $7,000. improvement in the economy throughout 1962. Since consumer prices rose approximately 1 per- Table A.--WER OF FAMILIES BY 1962 FAMILY INCW, cent during this period, not all of the in- FOR THE UNITED STATES crease in the average family income represented Number of a net gain in real income.' Family income families Average family income in current dollars has doubled in the postwar period (from $3,000 Total............................. 46,998,000 in 1947 to $6,000 in 1962). However, consumer Under 81,000.. .......................... 1,950,000 prices have risen substantially during this $1,000 to $1,999 ........................ 3,469,000 period so that only about three-fifths of the $2,000 to $2,999.. ...................... 3,901,000 4,325,000 increase in current-dollar incomes represented $3,000 to $3,999.. ...................... $4,000 to $4,999........................ 4,669,000 an increase in real income. In terms of con- $5,000 to $5,999.. ...................... 5,424,000 stant (1962) dollars, average family income $6,000 to $6,999.. ...................... 5,100,000 $7,999........................ 4,023,000 increased from $4,100 in 1947 to about $6,000 $7,000 to $8,000 to $9,999 ........................ 5,804,000 in 1962, a rise that averaged approximately $10,000 to $14,999 ...................... 6,019,000 $120 a year over this period. $15,000 and over........................ 2,314,000 The distribution of families (groups of two or more related persons residing together) by their money income in 1962 is summarized in Average family income in 1962 varied by table A (derived from table 1). About 94 mil- regions, ranging from $4,600 in the South to lion families, or 20 percent of the 47 million $6,700 in the West; with the Northeast and families in the Nation, received money incomes North Central Regions averaging $6,600 and below $3,000 in 1962. The number of families $6,300, respectively. Regional differences in in this income range declined by approximately average income were relatively greater among one-half million from the preceding year. The nonwhite than among white families. Median in- number of families with incomes of $7,000 or comes of nonwhite families ranged from $2,500 more in 1962 rose by about 1 million over 1961, in the South to $5,000 in the West (where Ne- groes represent only about one-half of the non- See -MonnLy Labor Review, March 1963, Vol. 86, white population), with the Northern regions No. 3, table D-1, page 358. averaging about $4,300. For white families, For sale by the Bureau of trhc Gem, Washingtan, D.C., 20233,50 cents. Amwl subscription (Series P-60 and P-65, combim4, $1.25. 2 A. I' b ,"*.*.b,f i - the median family income was $5,200 in the South, the male income recipients. However, even among as compared with $6,900 for the West, and $6,700 year-round full-time workers, the average incme and $6,400 for the Northeast and North Ceritral of women was substantially less than that of men, Regions, respectively. For the United States as a $3,500 as compared with $5,800. The proportion of whole, nonwhite families averaged $3,300 in 1962, women receiving income continued its marked post- as compared with $6,200 for white families. war rise in 1962, reaching 58 percent in that year Average family income in 1962 ranged from a as compared with only 39 percent in 1947. The pro- low of $1,700 for families headedbyprivate house- portion of nale income recipients,at91 percent in hold workers to $9,100 for those headed by profes- 1962, remained substantially the same as in 1947. sional workers. Families headed by self -employed These are some of the highlights from the professional workers reported the highest average inquiry on consumer income in 1962 made in Much income ($13,300), considerably higher than that 1963 in connection with the Eureau's Current Popu- received by families headed by salaried profes- lation Survey. The survey covered the civilian sional workers ($8,800). One-third of the 37 mil- noninstitutional population and members of the lion families with head an employed civilian were Armed Forces living off postorwith their families headed by persons who were engaged in one of three on post in the United States. occupation groups (sales workers, clerical work- Data on consumer income collected by the ers, or craftsmen) in which the average income Bureau of the Census cover money income only, ranged from $6,500 to $7,100. The 7 million fam- prior to deductions for taxes. The fact that many ilies headed by operatives (largely semiskilled fan families receive part of their income in the workers in manufacturing and related industries) form of rent-free housing and goods produced and had a median income of $6,000. consumed on the farm rather than in money should For men, the 1962 median income advanced to a be taken into consideration in comparing the in- high of $4,400, up $180, or 4 percent, f~omthe come of farm and nonfarm residents. preceding year. The median income of white males Since the estimates in this report are based was about $4,700 in 1962, up $230, or 5 percent, on a sample, they are subject to sampling varia- from 1961. At $2,300, the median income of non- bility. Particular care should be exercised in white lnales remained the same as in 1961. Approx- the interpretation of figures based on relatively imately 58 percent of all male income recipients small numbers of cases as well as small differences reported that they worked 50 weeks or more at between figures. Moreover, as in all field sur- full-time jobs during 1962. This was about the veys of income, the figures are subject to errors same proportion as in the preceding four years but of response and nonreporting. well below the 61 percent reported in 1957. The median income of year-round full-time male workers INCOME OF FAMILIES was $5,800 in 1962, up $160, or 3 percent, from 1961. All other male workers had an average in- Average family incomes continued upward in come of $2,200, about the same as it had been in 1962, increasing by $220, or 4 percent, to a new the preceding year. The average income of men who high of $6,000. Between 1960 and 1961, average did not work at all but depended entirely upon family income rose by only $120, or 2 percent. pensions, dividends, public assistance, or other Figure 1 illustrates the marked upward trend in such sources was about $1,400 in 1962, an increase current-dollar average family income that charac- of $160 over the previous year. The average income terized the postwar period and the interruptions in 1962 of men who were unemployed in March 1963 that took place in years of cyclical decline of was estimated at about $2,300. This was about the economic activity. The average (median) family same as the income for 1961 reported by men who income doubled during this whole period, from were unemployed in March 1962. $3,000 in 1947 to $6,000 in 1962, a rise that Women's incomes which averaged $1,300 in1962, averaged $200 a year. remained substantially the same as in the pre- The rise in average family income was accom- ceding two years, but were up $120, or 10 percent, panied by a major shift of families upward along from 1959. This relatively low median income re- the entire income scale. The proportion of fam- sults in part from the sizable proportion of fe- ilies with current-dollar incomes of less than males who worked only part time or intermittently $5,000 was cut in half (from 80 percent to 39 per- during the year, or whose income was limited to cent), whereas the proportion of families with small amounts from sources other than earnings. incomes of $10,000 and over has risen from 3 per- About one-fourth of all female income recipients cent to 18 percent over the same period. Despite in 1962 reported only the receipt of nonearned in- the marked rise in incomes that has taken place, come (pensions, rent, dividends, interest, public about one in every five families reported less assistance, etc.) as compared with one-tenth of than $3,000 in money income in 1962 (table B). Fi- 1.-INDEX OF MEDIAN FAYILY u(aQyE IN CURRDCT.AND current-dollar income adjusted for price changes. CONSTANT DOLLARS, FOR THE UNITED STATES warn The adjustment for price change in table C was l962 made by converting the income distribution for families and unrelated individuals for each year (1947 through 1x1) into 1962 dollars on the basis of the change in the Consumer Price Index.
Recommended publications
  • Judgement No. 92 41
    Judgement No. 92 41 Judgement No. 92 (Original : English) Case No. 91: Against : The Secretary-General of Higgins the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Orgauization Request for rescission of a decision of the Secretary-General of IMCO terminating the secondment of a United Nations stafl member to IMCO before its date of expiration. No rules of law dealing specifically with the rights and obligations of members of the staff of the United Nations and its specialized agencies who take up service with an organization different from the one to which they belong, whether by “loan”, ” transfer “, or “ secondment “.-Legal effect of the agreement (CO-ORDINATION/ R.430) and the Memorandum of Understanding (CO-ORD/CC/S0/91) of the Consul- tative Committee on Administrative Questions. Legal definition of ” secondment “.-Distinguished from “ transfer ” and “ loan ‘I.- Existence of three parties to a contract of secondment, namely, the releasing organization, the receiving organization and the staff member concerned.-Consent of staff member required to secondment, its duration, and the terms and conditions of employment in the receiving organization.-Terms and conditions of secondment cannot be varied unilaterally or simply by agreement between the two organizations to the detriment of the staff member.-Inapplicability of Staff Regulation 1.2 of the United hrations.- Existence of a contract of employment between IMCO and the Applicant and applicability to the Applicant of the Staff Regulations and Rules of IMCO, including IMCO Staff Regulation 9, despite the absence of a letter of appointment from IMCO.-Non-obser- vance by the Respondent of the due process to which the Applicant was entitled before termination of secondment.-Contested decision cannot be sustained.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Income of Families and Persons in the United States: 1960
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS Richard M. Scammon, Director tr H. Hodges, Secretary CURRENT POPULATION REPORTS CONSUMER INCOME January 17, 1962 Washington 25, D .C . Series P-60, No. 37 INCOME OF FAMILIES AND PERSONS IN THE UNITED STATES: 1960 (Advance data on the 1960 income of families and persons were issued in June 1961 in Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 36. Data for 1959 and 1960 include Alaska and Hawaii which were not covered in earlier years) For the country as a whole, the average (median) of approximately 3+ percent. This was about 1 per- income of familiesin1960 was $5,600; but, for families centage point more than the corresponding average rate headed by persons 65 years and over, the average was for the 13-year period since 1947, reflecting the only $2,900, according to estimates released today by marked upswing in economic activity and the introduc- the Bureau of the Census, Department of Comnerce. The tion of a full-employment economy that took place dur- all-family average was $200, or 4 percent, higher than ing the early 1940's. in 1959, despite the downturn in economic activity in In 1960, about 6 million families (groups Of two "-e closing months of 1960. Since prices rose some- or more related persons residing together) received ft between 1959 and 1960, the gain inreal purchasing money incomes of less than $2,000. They comprised power of the median family in the United States, how- 13 percent of the 453 million families in the Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Income Forecast DRAFT 08.12.2020
    Household Income Forecast DRAFT 08.12.2020 HOUSEHOLD INCOME FORECAST Thurston County DRAFT 08.12.2020 Thurston Regional Planning Council Household Income Forecast DRAFT 08.12.2020 Title VI Notice Thurston Regional Planning Council (TRPC) hereby gives public notice that it is the agency’s policy to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI requires that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any Federal Highway Aid (FHWA) program or other activity for which TRPC receives federal financial assistance. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint with TRPC. Any such complaint must be in writing and filed with the TRPC’s Title VI Coordinator within one hundred and eighty (180) days following the date of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be provided in alternate formats by contacting the Thurston Regional Planning Council at 360.956.7575 or email [email protected]. For more information contact: Michael Ambrogi, Senior GIS Analyst Thurston Regional Planning Council 2424 Heritage Court SW, Suite A Olympia, WA 98502 360.956.7575 [email protected] This report was funded by the cities of Lacey, Olympia, and Tumwater through grants from the Washington State Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Income Tax: Arin / Istock © Sk the Basics and New Changes
    PAGE ONE Economics® Individual Income Tax: arin / iStock © sk The Basics and New Changes Jeannette N. Bennett, Senior Economic Education Specialist GLOSSARY “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” Adjusted gross income: Gross income minus —Ben Franklin specific adjustments to income. (Gross income is the total amount earned before any adjustments are subtracted.) Earned income: Money you get for the work Introduction you do. There are two ways to get earned income: You work for someone who pays Taxes are certain. One primary tax is the individual income tax. Congress you, or you own or run a business or farm. initiated the first federal income tax in 1862 to collect revenue for the Income: The payment people receive for pro- expenses of the Civil War. The tax was eliminated in 1872. It made a short- viding resources in the marketplace. When lived comeback in 1894 but was ruled unconstitutional the very next year. people work, they provide human resources (labor) and in exchange they receive income Then, in 1913, the federal income tax resurfaced when the 16th Amend- in the form of wages or salaries. People also ment to the Constitution gave Congress legal authority to tax income. earn income in the form of rent, profit, and And today, the federal income tax is well established and certain. interest. Income tax: Taxes on income, both earned (salaries, wages, tips, commissions) and 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1913) unearned (interest, dividends). Income taxes can be levied on both individuals The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever (personal income taxes) and businesses source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard (business and corporate income taxes).
    [Show full text]
  • 4, ¢, 4, Tax Reform Will Force Complete Realpraisal of Current Employee Benefit Packages and a Return to the Basics
    E B R I EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE OCIOBER 1986 NUMBER FIFTY-NINE 4, ¢, 4, Tax reform will force complete realpraisal of current employee benefit packages and a return to the basics. 4,4,4, Tax Reform and Employee Benefits The recently enacted tax reform legislation makes dramatic changes in employee benefits both through the numerous provisions directly affecting benefits and through the overall reduction in individual income tax rates. The changes in the pension and welfare benefit area are intended to produce more comparable employee benefit coverage of rank and file employees and of highly compensated employees. Pension changes, assuming that plans are maintained, increase the number of vested workers through faster vesting schedules, increase pension amounts for rank and file employees by limiting the coordination with Social Security benefits, and mandate broader and more comparable coverage of rank and file employees. Higher-paid employees, however, suffer potential losses in benefits: restrictions on 401(k) salary reduction contributions ($7,000 cap, tighter nondiscrimination rules, and inclusion of all after-tax contributions as annual additions under the section 415 limits); a new limit of $200,000 on the amount of compensation that may be taken into account under all qualified plans; a new excess benefit tax of 15 percent on most annual distributions over $112,500; and sharply reduced maximum benefits payable to early retirees under defined benefit plans. Changes in welfare benefit areas aim for the same effect: an intended broadening of benefits because of tighter nondiscrimination rules that also could reduce tax-favored benefits payable to the higher paid.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2001 The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Christina Paige, "The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963." (2001). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 114. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/114 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _______________ by Christina Paige Jones May 2001 _______________ Dr. Elwood Watson, Chair Dr. Stephen Fritz Dr. Dale Schmitt Keywords: John F. Kennedy, Civil Rights, Vietnam War ABSTRACT THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 by Christina Paige Jones This thesis addresses events and issues that occurred in 1963, how President Kennedy responded to them, and what followed after Kennedy’s assassination. This thesis was created by using books published about Kennedy, articles from magazines, documents, telegrams, speeches, and Internet sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of the Florida Minimum Wage Proposal
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE FLORIDA MINIMUM WAGE PROPOSAL Dr. Robert Pollin Dr. Mark Brenner Ms. Jeannette Wicks-Lim Political Economy Research Institute University of Massachusetts, Amherst Economic Analysis of the Florida Minimum Wage Proposal 3 Economic Analysis of the Florida Minimum Wage Proposal 3 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE FLORIDA MINIMUM WAGE PROPOSAL September 2004 Dr. Robert Pollin Professor of Economics and Co-Director Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) University of Massachusetts, Amherst Gordon Hall, 418 N. Pleasant Street Amherst, MA 01002 (413) 577-0126; [email protected] Dr. Mark Brenner Assistant Research Professor Political Economy Research Institute University of Massachusetts, Amherst Ms. Jeannette Wicks-Lim Graduate Research Fellow Political Economy Research Institute University of Massachusetts, Amherst We are grateful for the research support from Liana Fox, James Heintz, Nuria Malet, and Ozgur Organhazi. We also benefited from comments on a previous draft by staff members of the Center for American Progress, especially Christian Weller. Robert Pollin is also grateful for comments on a preliminary oral presentation of parts of this analysis by members of the State’s Fiscal Impact Estimating Conference, at their June 3, 2004, public hearing. 4 Economic Analysis of the Florida Minimum Wage Proposal 5 4 Economic Analysis of the Florida Minimum Wage Proposal 5 Economic Analysis of Florida Minimum Wage Proposal Table of Contents Highlights of Basic Findings . 6 Summary. 10 Full Analysis of Florida Minimum Wage Proposal . 17 I. Introduction. 17 II. Background on Minimum Wages and Living Wages in the United States . 18 III. Statistical Methods and Sources . 19 IV. Estimated Costs of Minimum Wage Measure for Florida Businesses .
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5 Explanation of Terms
    Section 5 Explanation of Terms he Explanation of Terms section is designed to clarify Additional Standard Deduction the statistical content of this report and should not be (line 39a, and included in line 40, Form 1040) T construed as an interpretation of the Internal Revenue See “Standard Deduction.” Code, related regulations, procedures, or policies. Explanation of Terms relates to column or row titles used Additional Taxes in one or more tables in this report. It provides the background (line 44b, Form 1040) or limitations necessary to interpret the related statistical Taxes calculated on Form 4972, Tax on Lump-Sum tables. For each title, the line number of the tax form on which Distributions, were reported here. it is reported appears after the title. Definitions marked with the symbol ∆ have been revised for 2015 to reflect changes in Adjusted Gross Income Less Deficit the law. (line 37, Form 1040) Adjusted gross income (AGI) is defined as total income Additional Child Tax Credit (line 22, Form 1040) minus statutory adjustments (line 36, (line 67, Form 1040) Form 1040). Total income included: See “Child Tax Credit.” • Compensation for services, including wages, salaries, fees, commissions, tips, taxable fringe benefits, and Additional Medicare Tax similar items; (line 62a, Form 1040) Starting in 2013, a 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax • Taxable interest received; was applied to Medicare wages, railroad retirement com- • Ordinary dividends and capital gain distributions; pensation, and self-employment income that were more than $200,000 for single, head of household, or qualifying • Taxable refunds of State and local income taxes; widow(er) ($250,000 for married filing jointly, or $125,000 • Alimony and separate maintenance payments; for married filing separately).
    [Show full text]
  • The Prairie View Standard - June 1963 - Vol
    Prairie View A&M University Digital Commons @PVAMU PV Standard Newspapers Publications 6-1963 The Prairie View Standard - June 1963 - Vol. LIII No. 9 Prairie View Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/pv-newspapers Recommended Citation Prairie View Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas. (1963). The Prairie View Standard - June 1963 - Vol. LIII No. 9., Vol. LIII No. 9 Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/pv-newspapers/283 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Digital Commons @PVAMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in PV Standard Newspapers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @PVAMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Pn&OUe Staudatd VOLUME 53 Prairie View A. & M. College, Prairie View Branch, Hempstead, Texasjune, 1963 NUMBER NINE Cheerleading and Dr. Evans Baton Twirlers Clinic Scheduled Talks With A clinic for cheerleaders, baton twirlers, majorettes and school President sponsors of these activities is President John F. Kennedy in­ scheduled at Prairie View A. and vited Dr. E. B. Evans to meet M. College on July 14-19. with him at the White House on Nearly a thousand elementary Wednesday, June 19. and high school students usual­ ly attend the annual clinic which Dr. Evans attended the top- is now in its seventh year. An level conference which is report­ outstanding staff of visiting in­ ed to have concerned itself with structors will include Roland civil rights problems and educa­ Brinkley, director, Bob Wasson, tion on all levels. Windy Roaches, Linda Robert­ son, Jane Hamilton, Ilene Slates, PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING — Students are shown at work in reading Caren Oiolli, Judy Barnes, and room of Public Health Center.
    [Show full text]
  • This Table Shows the Total Tax Paid ($) on Annual Taxable Income. For
    This table shows the total tax paid ($) on annual taxable income. For example, a person with an annual taxable income of $60,000 will pay $4,990 plus 25% of ($60,000 - $36,250) Total Tax Paid ($) at the top of this taxable Annual Taxable Income Bracket ($) Tax Rate income bracket 0 - 8,950 10% 895 8,950 - 36,250 15% 4,990 36,250 - 87,850 25% 17,890 87,850 - 183,250 28% 44,602 183,250 - 400,000 33% 116,129 400,000 and over 39.6% Question 1 Bill has an annual taxable income of $28,950. The income tax, to the nearest $, he has to pay is: A. $2,895 B. $3,895 C. $4,342 D. $4,510 E. $5,237 Answer 1 It is very easy to get the wrong answer if the question is not read carefully and make the incorrect assumption of placing Bill's income into the $8,950-36,250 income bracket and taxing his entire salary at 15%. 0.15 x 28,950 = $4342.5 By reading the example they give in the question 'For example, a person with an annual taxable income of $60,000 will pay $4,990 plus 25% of ($60,000 - $36,250)' it is clear that each part of their salary is taxed at a separate rate. To get the correct answer we need to divide his total salary into the correct brackets and calculate the allocated tax for each part. His salary is $28,950 which means $8,950 is taxed in the first bracket (10% tax) and the remaining $20,000 is taxed in the second bracket (15% tax).
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily Egyptian, June 11, 1963
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC June 1963 Daily Egyptian 1963 6-11-1963 The aiD ly Egyptian, June 11, 1963 Daily Egyptian Staff Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/de_June1963 Volume 44, Issue 117 Recommended Citation , . "The aiD ly Egyptian, June 11, 1963." (Jun 1963). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Daily Egyptian 1963 at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in June 1963 by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • Fraremity ForDegr~ DAILY EGYPTIAN Chark!r At Stake Page.4..s SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Page 6 . Volume« EXTRA Carbondale, Illinois Tuesday, June 11, 1963 EXTRA Number 117 Record 1,400 To Receive Degrees I i .. .If .If Governor OHo Kerner i 8 To Receive Will Be The Speaker The largest graduating degree from Brown University Ph.D Degrees class In SIU's history --1,400 and a law degree from North-' candidates--will receive de­ western U n tv e r sit yin The Graduate School has grees Tbursday at the 88th Evanston. announced tbe names of eight annual spring commencement. The entire commencement candidates for doctor of pbi­ Tbe program will begin at will be televised live over losphy degrees from SIU this 7:30 p. m. in MCAndrew WSlU-TV, Channel 8, begin­ June. Stadium. ning at 7:30 p.m. Tuesday. Tbe 88th annual commence­ Governor Otto Kerner will Ricbard Uray, operations ment Will be beld June 13 be the speaker. Kerner, who manager for the televiSion at 7:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Current Business September 1963
    SEPTEMBER 1963 survey of CURRENT BUSINESS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS SEPTEMBER 1963 VOL. 43, NO, 9 U.S. Department of Commerc Luther H. Hodges Secretary Office of Business Economics George Jaszi Director Contents Louis J. Paradiso THE BUSINESS SITUATION PAGE Associate Director Summary. 1 Murray F. Foss Editor K. Celeste Stokes Billy Jo Hu Corporate Profits and National Income in Second Quarter Statistics Editor Graphics 1963..., 2 STAFF CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS ISSUE Plant and Equipment Programs, Second Half 1963—Con- Business Review and Features: Francis L. Hirt tinued Rise Projected 5 Robert B. Bretzfelder Genevieve B. Wimsatt Manufacturers Expect Higher Inventories and Sales in Second Marie P. Hertzberg Leonard G. Campbell Half of 1963 7 Martin L. Marimont Article: GNP by Major Industries, 1958-62—Revised and Updated. 9 Charles S. Friedman Robert M. Wiley The Balance of International Payments During the Second Quarter 11 ARTICLE Subscription prices, including weekly g Stocks of Passenger Cars: Postwar Growth and Distribution. 17 tistical supplements, are $4 a year for mestic and $7.50 for foreign mailing. Sir issue 30 cents. CURRENT BUSINESS STATISTICS Make checks payable to the Supei tendent of Documents and send to I General S1-S24 Government Printing Office, Washingt Industry. S24-S40 D.C., 20402, or to any U.S. Departmenl Subject Index Inside Back Cover Commerce Field Office. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FIELD OFFICES Albuquerque, N. Mex., 87101, U.S. Courthouse. Phone Denver, Colo., 80202, 142 New Customhouse. Phone New York, N.Y., 10001, Empire State Bldg.
    [Show full text]